Monetary Policy Flexibility, Risk Management, and Financial Disruptions
|
|
- Clementine Tyler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Speech Governor Frederic S. Mishkin At the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, New York January 11, 2008 Monetary Policy Flexibility, Risk Management, and Financial Disruptions In my remarks today, I would like to consider the rationale for greater flexibility in monetary policy during periods of financial disruptions. Before doing so, however, I would like to make not just one, but two important disclaimers. First, as usual, my remarks reflect only my own views and are not intended to reflect those of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) or of anyone else associated with the Federal Reserve System. And second, my comments today should not be viewed as suggesting what policy actions I would be likely to advocate at the next FOMC meeting; rather, my purpose here is to discuss at a general level what can be said about the appropriate framework for monetary policy when we face a financial disruption of the sort that we have seen recently. I have two reasons for making the second disclaimer. First, in some circumstances, the appropriate near-term path for policy rates can be highly uncertain and may well evolve right up until the time of the meeting, depending on the implications of the incoming data. Second, as I noted in a speech in late November, I think there is too much focus on what decision will be made about the federal funds rate target at the next FOMC meeting (Mishkin, 2007e). What is important for pricing most financial assets is the path of monetary policy, not the particular action taken at a single meeting. For these reasons, I hope the recent enhancements to the Federal Reserve s communication strategy- -especially the greater prominence of the macroeconomic projections of FOMC participants--will help shift attention toward our medium-term objectives and our approach in meeting these objectives. 1 In particular, the Congress has given the Federal Reserve a specific mandate (often referred to as the dual mandate) of fostering the objectives of price stability and maximum employment. Therefore, when the economy faces a disruption in financial markets, monetary policy must aim at balancing the risks to both economic growth and inflation. In the remainder of this speech, I will elaborate a bit further about why financial market disruptions can pose significant risks to the macroeconomy. Then I will explain how the science of monetary policy can help provide a conceptual framework for a systematic approach to managing these risks, and I will briefly discuss how that framework can be useful for understanding the course of Federal Reserve policy over the past few months. Financial Disruptions and Macroeconomic Risk Before considering the appropriate policy response to strains in financial markets, it is essential to consider the sources of these strains and the potential consequences for the macroeconomy. In general, the U.S. financial system is an efficient mechanism for channeling funds to individuals or corporations with worthy investment opportunities, because the financial markets are highly competitive and provide strong incentives for collecting and processing information. Although financial markets and institutions deal with large volumes of information, some of this information is by nature asymmetric; that is, one party to a financial contract (typically the lender) has less accurate information about the likely distribution of outcomes than does the other party (typically the borrower). 2 Historically, banks and other financial intermediaries have played a major role in reducing the asymmetry of information, partly because these firms tend to have long-term relationships with their clients. Recent years have witnessed the development of new types of
2 financial institutions and of new markets for trading financial products, and these innovations have had the potential (not always realized) to contribute to the efficient flow of information. The continuity of this information flow is crucial to the process of price discovery--that is, the ability of market participants to assess the fundamental worth of each financial asset. During periods of financial distress, however, information flows may be disrupted and price discovery may be impaired. As a result, such episodes tend to generate greater uncertainty, which contributes to higher credit spreads and greater reluctance to engage in market transactions. As I noted in another recent speech, financial disruptions are associated with two distinct types of risk: valuation risk and macroeconomic risk (Mishkin, 2007d). Valuation risk refers to the extent that market participants become more uncertain about the returns on a specific asset, especially in cases where the security is highly complex and its underlying creditworthiness is relatively opaque. In recent months, for example, this type of risk has been central to the repricing of many structured credit products, as investors have struggled to understand how potential losses in subprime mortgages might filter through the various layers of securities linked to these loans. While valuation risk is relevant for individual investors, monetary policymakers are concerned with macroeconomic risk. In particular, strains in financial markets can spill over to the broader economy and have adverse consequences on output and employment. Furthermore, an economic downturn tends to generate even greater uncertainty about asset values, which could initiate an adverse feedback loop in which the financial disruption restrains economic activity; such a situation could lead to greater uncertainty and increased financial disruption, causing a further deterioration in macroeconomic activity, and so on. In the academic literature, this phenomenon is generally referred to as the financial accelerator (Bernanke and Gertler, 1989; Bernanke, Gertler, and Gilchrist, 1996, 1999). The quality of balance sheets of households and firms comprise a key element of the financial accelerator mechanism, because some of the assets of each borrower may serve as collateral for its liabilities. The use of collateral helps mitigate the problem of asymmetric information, because the borrower s incentive not to engage in excessive risk-taking is strengthened by the threat of losing the collateral: If a default does occur, the lender can take title to the borrower s collateral and thereby recover some or all of the value of the loan. However, a macroeconomic downturn tends to diminish the value of many forms of collateral, thereby exacerbating the impact of frictions in credit markets and reinforcing the propagation of the adverse feedback loop. Risk Management and the Science of Monetary Policy Given that a financial market disruption can pose significant risks to the macroeconomy, risk management is crucial in formulating the appropriate response of monetary policy. Unfortunately, most existing studies of optimal monetary policy have completely abstracted from considerations of macroeconomic risk, because these studies use specific formulations or approximations which imply that the design of the optimal monetary policy does not depend on the magnitude or direction of uncertainty facing the economy--an implication referred to as certainty equivalence. To elaborate on these issues, it s necessary for me to proceed at a somewhat more technical level, but I promise to use plain English again later in the speech. In particular, the standard textbook approach to analyzing optimal monetary policy utilizes a linear-quadratic (LQ) framework, in which the equations describing the dynamic behavior of the economy are linear and the objective function specifying the goals of policy is quadratic. For example, in light of the dual mandate, monetary policy is often characterized as seeking to minimize a loss function comprising the squared value of the inflation gap (that is, actual inflation minus desired inflation) and the squared value of the output gap (that is, actual output minus potential output). Under these assumptions, the optimal policy is certainty equivalent: This policy can be characterized by a linear time-invariant response to each shock, and the magnitude of these responses does not depend on the variances or any other aspect of the probability distribution of the shocks. In such an environment, optimal monetary policy does not focus on risk management. Furthermore, when
3 financial market participants and wage and price setters are relatively forward-looking, the optimal policy under commitment is characterized by considerable inertia. 3 Indeed, the actual course of monetary policy over the past quarter-century has typically been very smooth in the United States as well as in many other industrial economies. For example, the Federal Reserve has usually adjusted the federal funds rate in increments of 25 or 50 basis points (that is, 1/4 or 1/2 percentage point) and sharp reversals in the funds rate path have been rare. Numerous empirical studies have characterized monetary policy using Taylor-style rules in which the policy rate responds to the inflation gap and the output gap; these studies have generally found that the fit of the regression equation is improved by including a lagged interest rate that reflects the smoothness of the typical adjustment pattern. 4 While an LQ framework may provide a reasonable approximation to how monetary policy should operate under fairly normal circumstances, this approach is less likely to be adequate for thinking about monetary policy when the risk of poor economic performance is unusually high. First, the dynamic behavior of the economy may well exhibit nonlinearities, at least in response to some shocks (Hamilton, 1989; Kim and Nelson, 1999; and Kim, Morley, and Piger, 2005). Furthermore, the use of a quadratic objective function does not reflect the extent to which most individuals have strong preferences for minimizing the incidence of worst-case scenarios. Therefore, given that the central bank s ultimate goal should be to maximize the public welfare, I believe that the design of monetary policy ought to reflect the public s preferences, especially with respect to avoiding particularly adverse economic outcomes. Most of the quantitative studies of optimal monetary policy have also assumed that the shocks hitting the economy have a time-invariant Gaussian distribution, that is, a classical bell curve with symmetric and well-behaved tails. In reality, however, the distribution of shocks hitting the economy is more complex. In some instances, the uncertainty facing the economy is clearly skewed in one direction or another; again, this is likely when there are significant financial disruptions. The Federal Reserve often reports on our judgments regarding the degree of skewness and the associated economic costs by giving assessments of the Balance of Risks in the press releases that are issued following FOMC meetings. In addition, at least in some circumstances, the shocks hitting the economy may exhibit excess kurtosis, commonly referred to as tail risk because the probability of relatively large disturbances is higher than would be implied by a Gaussian distribution. In that light, one element of the recent enhancements to the Federal Reserve s communication strategy is that FOMC participants now provide assessments of the relative degree of uncertainty. For example, in the Summary of Economic Projections issued in late November, FOMC participants indicated that the degree of uncertainty regarding the economic growth outlook was relatively high compared to the average degree of uncertainty over the past two decades. This account could be interpreted as a statement that the Committee perceived the tail risk as unusually large. With a nonquadratic objective function (consistent with the importance of uncertainty for the course of monetary policy) as well as nonlinear dynamics and non-gaussian shocks, optimal monetary policy will also be nonlinear and will tend to focus on risk management. Policy in this setting tends to respond aggressively when a large shock becomes evident; for this reason, the degree of inertia in such cases may be markedly lower than in more routine circumstances. Indeed, as I will argue, I believe that financial disruptions of the sort that have been experienced in recent months tend to have highly nonlinear effects on the economy. Thus, compared with the standard case, optimal policy may well involve much more rapid adjustment--a pattern that I will refer to as policy flexibility. Formal models of how monetary policy should respond to financial disruptions are unfortunately not yet available, and this is an area of research that I plan to pursue with Board staff. However, I do have some thoughts about what a systematic framework should look like, and I would like to share them with you without going into any further technical details.
4 A Risk-Management Framework for Dealing with Financial Disruptions Although the assumptions behind the LQ framework might be reasonable during normal times, financial disruptions are likely to produce large deviations from these assumptions, making it especially important to adopt a more flexible framework for analyzing the behavior of a central bank that practices risk management. What factors come into play with special vigor during financial disruptions? First, financial disruptions are likely to lead to highly nonlinear behavior because the cost and availability of credit can shift suddenly. Furthermore, even though linear approximations of the financial accelerator mechanism have typically been used in recent quantitative studies, this mechanism is, in fact, highly nonlinear (Levin, Natalucci, and Zakrajšek, 2004). Finally, because financial disruptions, if severe enough, raise the probability of particularly adverse outcomes, the standard approach of employing a quadratic approximation of the objective function may not be sufficiently accurate to convey the extent to which policymakers seek to avoid such outcomes in maximizing the public s welfare. In light of these risk-management considerations, how should monetary policy respond to financial disruptions? Periods of financial instability are characterized by valuation risk and macroeconomic risk. Monetary policy cannot--and should not--aim at minimizing valuation risk, but policy should aim at reducing macroeconomic risk. By cutting interest rates to offset the negative effects of financial turmoil on aggregate economic activity, monetary policy can reduce the likelihood that a financial disruption might set off an adverse feedback loop. The resulting reduction in uncertainty can then make it easier for the markets to collect the information that facilitates price discovery, thus hastening the return of normal market functioning. To achieve this result most effectively, monetary policy needs to be timely, decisive, and flexible. First, timely action is crucial when an episode of financial instability becomes sufficiently severe to threaten the core macroeconomic objectives of the central bank. In such circumstances, waiting too long to ease policy could result in further deterioration of the macroeconomy and might well increase the overall amount of easing that would eventually be needed. Therefore, monetary policy must be at least as preemptive in responding to financial shocks as in responding to other types of disturbances to the economy. When financial markets are working well, monetary policy can respond primarily to the incoming flow of economic data about production, employment, and inflation. When a financial disruption occurs, however, greater consideration needs to be given to indicators of market liquidity, credit spreads, and other financial market measures that can provide information about sharp changes in the magnitude of tail risk to the macroeconomy. Second, policymakers should be prepared for decisive action in response to financial disruptions. In such circumstances, the most likely outcome--referred to as the modal forecast--for the economy may be fairly benign, but there may be a significant risk of more severe adverse outcomes. In such circumstances, the central bank may prefer to take out insurance by easing the stance of policy further than if the distribution of probable outcomes were perceived as fairly symmetric around the modal forecast. Moreover, in such circumstances, these policy actions should not be interpreted by the public or market participants as implying a deterioration in the central bank s assessment of the most likely outcome for the economy, but rather as an appropriate form of risk management that reduces the risk of particularly adverse outcomes. Third, policy flexibility is crucial throughout the evolution of a financial market disruption. During the onset of the episode, this flexibility may be evident from the decisive easing of policy that is intended to forestall the contractionary effects of the disruption and provide insurance against the downside risks to the macroeconomy. However, it is important to recognize that financial markets can also turn around quickly, thereby reducing the drag on the economy as well as the degree of tail risk. Therefore, the central bank needs to monitor credit spreads and other incoming data for signs of financial market recovery and, if necessary, take back some of the insurance; thus, at each stage of the episode, the appropriate monetary policy may exhibit much less smoothing than would be typical in other circumstances.
5 Of course, while policymakers may need to react aggressively to financial market information that indicates a significant shift in macroeconomic risks, monetary policy would typically move back toward a more incremental approach once the risks to the macroeconomy have returned to more usual levels. Risk Management and the Anchoring of Inflation Expectations An important proviso to my discussion thus far involves the other part of the dual mandate, price stability. A central bank must always be concerned with inflation as well as growth. As I have emphasized in an earlier speech about inflation dynamics, the behavior of inflation is significantly influenced by the public s expectations about where inflation is likely to head in the long run (Mishkin, 2007a). Therefore, preemptive actions of the sort I have described here would be counterproductive if these actions caused an increase in inflation expectations and the underlying rate of inflation; in other words, the flexibility to act preemptively against a financial disruption presumes that inflation expectations are well anchored and unlikely to rise during a period of temporary monetary easing. Indeed, as I have argued elsewhere, a commitment to a strong nominal anchor is crucial for both aspects of the dual mandate, that is, for achieving maximum employment as well as for keeping inflation under control (Mishkin, 2007b). How can a central bank keep inflation expectations solidly anchored so it can respond preemptively to financial disruptions? The central bank has to have earned credibility with financial markets and the public through a record of previous actions to maintain low and stable inflation. Furthermore, the central bank needs to clearly indicate the rationale for its policy actions. Policymakers also need to monitor information about underlying inflation and longer-run inflation expectations, and if the evidence indicates that these inflation expectations have begun rising significantly, the central bank should be prepared to hold steady or even raise the policy rate. The Federal Reserve s Recent Monetary Policy Decisions The framework I have outlined here can be useful in understanding the rationale for the recent decisions of the Federal Reserve and our policy approach going forward. Yesterday, Chairman Bernanke provided a detailed discussion of economic and financial developments and of the Federal Reserve s policy strategy, so here I will just relate some key points of his discussion to the major themes that I have emphasized today. First, we are proceeding in a timely manner in countering any developments that might threaten economic or financial stability. The FOMC has not been basing its decisions solely on the incoming flow of economic data; for example, the sequence of interest rate cuts was initiated last fall even though growth in the gross domestic product had been quite strong in the third quarter. Rather, our policy approach has reflected the rapid deterioration of financial market conditions, which has contributed to a worsening of the economic outlook and the emergence of pronounced downside risks to economic growth and employment. Second, in my view, the Federal Reserve has been acting and will continue to act decisively, in the sense that our policy strategy reflects the evolution of the balance of risks and not simply a change in the modal outlook for the macroeconomy. The disruption in financial markets poses a substantial downside risk to the outlook for economic growth, and adverse economic or financial news has the potential to cause further strains. In that light, the Federal Reserve s policy strategy is aimed at providing insurance to help avoid more severe macroeconomic outcomes. Third, because we recognize that financial and economic conditions can change quickly, the Federal Reserve is prepared to respond flexibly to incoming information. Of course, in making its decisions, the Federal Reserve also gives careful consideration to the outlook and risks associated with the second aspect of our dual mandate, namely, price stability. Because longer-run inflation expectations appear to have remained reasonably well anchored, in my view, the easing of the stance of policy in response to deteriorating financial conditions seems unlikely to have an adverse impact on the outlook for inflation. Nonetheless, we will continue to monitor incoming data on inflation and inflation expectations, especially given the potential risks to price stability that are associated with the rapid increase in energy prices and the depreciation of the dollar. In short, the
6 FOMC will determine the future course of monetary policy in light of the evolution of the macroeconomic outlook and the balance of risks to our objectives of maximum employment and price stability. Conclusions The monetary policy that is appropriate during an episode of financial market disruption is likely to be quite different than in times of normal market functioning. When financial markets experience a significant disruption, a systematic approach to risk management requires policymakers to be preemptive in responding to the macroeconomic implications of incoming financial market information, and decisive actions may be required to reduce the likelihood of an adverse feedback loop. The central bank also needs to exhibit flexibility--that is, less inertia than would otherwise be typical--not only in moving decisively to reduce downside risks arising from a financial market disruption, but also in being prepared to take back some of that insurance in response to a recovery in financial markets or an upward shift in inflation risks. Finally, while I have argued that monetary policy needs to be decisive and timely in responding to a financial market disruption, a lot of art as well as science is involved in determining the severity and duration of the disruption and the associated implications for the macroeconomy (Mishkin, 2007c). Indeed, assessing the macroeconomic risks to output and inflation in such circumstances remains among the most difficult challenges faced by monetary policymakers. Furthermore, a central bank may well be able to employ non-monetary tools--such as liquidity provision--to help alleviate the adverse impact from financial disruptions. All of these considerations must be taken into account in determining the most appropriate course of monetary policy. References Benigno, Pierpaolo, and Michael Woodford (2003). Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy: A Linear-Quadratic Approach, in Mark Gertler and Kenneth Rogoff, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp Bernanke, Ben S. (2004). Gradualism, speech delivered at an economics luncheon co-sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Seattle Branch) and the University of Washington, held in Seattle, May 20. Bernanke, Ben S., and Mark Gertler (1989). Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations, American Economic Review, vol. 79 (March), pp Bernanke, Ben S., Mark Gertler, and Simon Gilchrist (1996). The Financial Accelerator and the Flight to Quality, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78 (February), pp Bernanke, Ben S., Mark Gertler, and Simon Gilchrist (1999). The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework, in John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford, eds., Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1, part 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp Clarida, Richard, Jordi Galí, and Mark Gertler (1998). Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence, European Economic Review, vol. 42 (June), pp Clarida, Richard, Jordi Galí, and Mark Gertler (1999). The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37 (December), pp Clarida, Richard, Jordi Galí, and Mark Gertler (2000). Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115 (February), pp English, William B., William R. Nelson, and Brian P. Sack (2003). Interpreting the Significance of the Lagged Interest Rate in Estimated Monetary Policy Rules, Contributions to Macroeconomics, vol. 3 (no. 1), article 5.
7 Erceg, Christopher J., Dale W. Henderson, and Andrew T. Levin (2000). Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 46 (October), pp Giannoni, Marc P., and Michael Woodford (2005). Optimal Inflation-Targeting Rules, in Ben S. Bernanke and Michael Woodford, eds., Inflation Targeting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp Goodfriend, Marvin, and Robert King (1997). The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy, in Ben S. Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp Hamilton, James D. (1989). A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle, Econometrica, vol. 57 (March), pp Kim, Chang-Jin, and Charles Nelson (1999). Has the U.S. Economy Become More Stable? A Bayesian Approach Based on a Markov-Switching Model of the Business Cycle, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 81 (November), pp Kim, Chang-Jin, James Morley, and Jeremy Piger (2005). Nonlinearity and the Permanent Effects of Recessions, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 20 (no. 2), pp King, Robert G., and Alexander L. Wolman (1999). What Should the Monetary Authority Do When Prices Are Sticky? in John Taylor, ed., Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp Levin, Andrew T., Fabio M. Natalucci, and Egon Zakrajšek (2004). The Magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions, Finance and Economics Discussion Series Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December. Levin, Andrew, Alexei Onatski, John C. Williams, and Noah Williams (2005). Monetary Policy under Uncertainty in Micro-Founded Macroeconometric Models, in Mark Gertler and Kenneth Rogoff, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007a). Inflation Dynamics, speech delivered at the Annual Macro Conference, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, March 23. Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007b). Monetary Policy and the Dual Mandate, speech delivered at Bridgewater College, Bridgewater, Va., April 10. Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007c). Will Monetary Policy Become More of a Science? Finance and Economics Discussion Series Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September. Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007d). Financial Instability and Monetary Policy, speech delivered at the Risk USA 2007 Conference, New York, November 5. Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007e). The Federal Reserve s Enhanced Communication Strategy and the Science of Monetary Policy, speech delivered to the Undergraduate Economics Association, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., November 29. Rotemberg, Julio, and Michael Woodford (1997). An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy, in Ben S. Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp Sack, Brian (2000). Does the Fed Act Gradually? A VAR Analysis, Economics, vol. 46 (August), pp Journal of Monetary
8 Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie, and Martin Uribe (2005). Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Medium-Scale Macroeconomic Model, in Mark Gertler and Kenneth Rogoff, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp Smets, Frank, and Raf Wouters (2003). An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1 (September), pp Woodford, Michael (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Footnotes 1. I appreciate the comments and assistance of William English, Andrew Levin, Brian Madigan, Roberto Perli, David Reifschneider, and David Wilcox. Return to text 2. Such asymmetry leads to two prominent difficulties for the functioning of the financial system: adverse selection and moral hazard. Adverse selection arises when investments that are most likely to produce an undesirable (adverse) outcome are the most likely to be financed (selected). For example, investors who intend to take on large amounts of risk are the most likely to be willing to seek out loans because they know that they are unlikely to pay them back. Moral hazard arises because a borrower has incentives to invest in high-risk projects, in which the borrower does well if the project succeeds but the lender bears a substantial loss if the project fails. Return to text 3. The now-classic textbook on this topic is Woodford (2003); refer also to Goodfriend and King (1997); Rotemberg and Woodford (1997); Clarida, Gali, and Gertler (1999); King and Wolman (1999); Erceg, Henderson, and Levin (2000); Benigno and Woodford (2003); Giannoni and Woodford (2005); Levin and others (2005); and Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe (2005); Return to text 4. Clarida, Gali, and Gertler (1998, 2000); Sack (2000); English, Nelson, and Sack (2003); Smets and Wouters (2003); Levin and others (2005); further discussion is in Bernanke (2004). Return to text Return to top
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IS MONETARY POLICY EFFECTIVE DURING FINANCIAL CRISES? Frederic S. Mishkin
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IS MONETARY POLICY EFFECTIVE DURING FINANCIAL CRISES? Frederic S. Mishkin Working Paper 14678 http://www.nber.org/papers/w14678 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts
More informationData Dependence and U.S. Monetary Policy. Remarks by. Richard H. Clarida. Vice Chairman. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
For release on delivery 8:30 a.m. EST November 27, 2018 Data Dependence and U.S. Monetary Policy Remarks by Richard H. Clarida Vice Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at The Clearing
More informationConditional versus Unconditional Utility as Welfare Criterion: Two Examples
Conditional versus Unconditional Utility as Welfare Criterion: Two Examples Jinill Kim, Korea University Sunghyun Kim, Sungkyunkwan University March 015 Abstract This paper provides two illustrative examples
More informationOutline for Behzad Diba s Discussion of. Buiter (2005), The Elusive Welfare Economics of Price Stability...
Outline for Behzad Diba s Discussion of Buiter (2005), The Elusive Welfare Economics of Price Stability... Basic Modeling Assumptions of the Optimal Taxation Literature Contributions in the tradition of:
More informationMonetary Policy Analysis. Bennett T. McCallum* Carnegie Mellon University. and. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Monetary Policy Analysis Bennett T. McCallum* Carnegie Mellon University and National Bureau of Economic Research October 10, 2001 *This paper was prepared for the NBER Reporter The past several years
More informationThe Effects of Dollarization on Macroeconomic Stability
The Effects of Dollarization on Macroeconomic Stability Christopher J. Erceg and Andrew T. Levin Division of International Finance Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Washington, DC 2551 USA
More informationThe Limits of Monetary Policy Under Imperfect Knowledge
The Limits of Monetary Policy Under Imperfect Knowledge Stefano Eusepi y Marc Giannoni z Bruce Preston x February 15, 2014 JEL Classi cations: E32, D83, D84 Keywords: Optimal Monetary Policy, Expectations
More informationCharles I Plosser: Strengthening our monetary policy framework through commitment, credibility, and communication
Charles I Plosser: Strengthening our monetary policy framework through commitment, credibility, and communication Speech by Mr Charles I Plosser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve
More informationBrian P Sack: The SOMA portfolio at $2.654 trillion
Brian P Sack: The SOMA portfolio at $2.654 trillion Remarks by Mr Brian P Sack, Executive Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, before the Money Marketeers of New York University, New
More informationMonetary Policy Options in a Low Policy Rate Environment
Monetary Policy Options in a Low Policy Rate Environment James Bullard President and CEO, FRB-St. Louis IMFS Distinguished Lecture House of Finance Goethe Universität Frankfurt 21 May 2013 Frankfurt-am-Main,
More informationMonetary Policy Frameworks and the Effective Lower Bound on Interest Rates
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Monetary Policy Frameworks and the Effective Lower Bound on Interest Rates Thomas Mertens John C. Williams Staff Report No. 877 January 2019 This paper presents
More informationStrengthening Our Monetary Policy Framework Through Commitment, Credibility, and Communication
Strengthening Our Monetary Policy Framework Through Commitment, Credibility, and Communication Global Interdependence Center's 2011 Global Citizen Award Luncheon November 8, 2011 Union League Club, Philadelphia,
More informationFinancial Fragility and the Lender of Last Resort
READING 11 Financial Fragility and the Lender of Last Resort Desiree Schaan & Timothy Cogley Financial crises, such as banking panics and stock market crashes, were a common occurrence in the U.S. economy
More informationComments on Monetary Policy at the Effective Lower Bound
BPEA, September 13-14, 2018 Comments on Monetary Policy at the Effective Lower Bound Janet Yellen, Distinguished Fellow in Residence Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Brookings Institution
More informationComment on: The zero-interest-rate bound and the role of the exchange rate for. monetary policy in Japan. Carl E. Walsh *
Journal of Monetary Economics Comment on: The zero-interest-rate bound and the role of the exchange rate for monetary policy in Japan Carl E. Walsh * Department of Economics, University of California,
More informationRemarks on the FOMC s Monetary Policy Framework
Remarks on the FOMC s Monetary Policy Framework Loretta J. Mester President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Panel Remarks at the 2018 U.S. Monetary Policy Forum Sponsored
More informationFrederic S Mishkin: Does stabilizing inflation contribute to stabilizing economic activity?
Frederic S Mishkin: Does stabilizing inflation contribute to stabilizing economic activity? Speech by Mr Frederic S Mishkin, Member of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System, at the East
More informationTHE BENEFITS OF SYSTEMATIC MONETARY POLICY
THE BENEFITS OF SYSTEMATIC MONETARY POLICY National Association for Business Economics Washington Economic Policy Conference Washington, D.C. March 3, 2008 Charles I. Plosser President and Chief Executive
More informationInflation Persistence and Relative Contracting
[Forthcoming, American Economic Review] Inflation Persistence and Relative Contracting by Steinar Holden Department of Economics University of Oslo Box 1095 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway email: steinar.holden@econ.uio.no
More informationDiscussion of Trend Inflation in Advanced Economies
Discussion of Trend Inflation in Advanced Economies James Morley University of New South Wales 1. Introduction Garnier, Mertens, and Nelson (this issue, GMN hereafter) conduct model-based trend/cycle decomposition
More informationAlternative Views of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism: What Difference Do They Make for Monetary Policy?
Alternative Views of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism: What Difference Do They Make for Monetary Policy? By John B. Taylor Stanford University December 2000 Abstract: This paper examines how alternative
More informationMaking Monetary Policy: Rules, Benchmarks, Guidelines, and Discretion
EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:35 AM U.S. Eastern Time on Friday, October 13, 2017 OR UPON DELIVERY Making Monetary Policy: Rules, Benchmarks, Guidelines, and Discretion Eric S. Rosengren President & Chief Executive
More informationMonetary Fiscal Policy Interactions under Implementable Monetary Policy Rules
WILLIAM A. BRANCH TROY DAVIG BRUCE MCGOUGH Monetary Fiscal Policy Interactions under Implementable Monetary Policy Rules This paper examines the implications of forward- and backward-looking monetary policy
More informationBrian P Sack: Implementing the Federal Reserve s asset purchase program
Brian P Sack: Implementing the Federal Reserve s asset purchase program Remarks by Mr Brian P Sack, Executive Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, at the Global Interdependence Center
More informationComment. The New Keynesian Model and Excess Inflation Volatility
Comment Martín Uribe, Columbia University and NBER This paper represents the latest installment in a highly influential series of papers in which Paul Beaudry and Franck Portier shed light on the empirics
More informationThe financial stability mandate strikes back
CENTRAL BANKS The financial stability mandate strikes back Amanda Augustine / Kan Chen Before the Great Recession caused by the global financial crisis of 7-9, the Federal Reserve's dual mandate, namely
More informationCOMMENTS ON MONETARY POLICY UNDER UNCERTAINTY IN MICRO-FOUNDED MACROECONOMETRIC MODELS, BY A. LEVIN, A. ONATSKI, J. WILLIAMS AND N.
COMMENTS ON MONETARY POLICY UNDER UNCERTAINTY IN MICRO-FOUNDED MACROECONOMETRIC MODELS, BY A. LEVIN, A. ONATSKI, J. WILLIAMS AND N. WILLIAMS GIORGIO E. PRIMICERI 1. Introduction The 1970s and the 1980s
More informationCommentary: Challenges for Monetary Policy: New and Old
Commentary: Challenges for Monetary Policy: New and Old John B. Taylor Mervyn King s paper is jam-packed with interesting ideas and good common sense about monetary policy. I admire the clearly stated
More informationMonetary Policy Revised: January 9, 2008
Global Economy Chris Edmond Monetary Policy Revised: January 9, 2008 In most countries, central banks manage interest rates in an attempt to produce stable and predictable prices. In some countries they
More informationMacroeconomic Policy during a Credit Crunch
ECONOMIC POLICY PAPER 15-2 FEBRUARY 2015 Macroeconomic Policy during a Credit Crunch EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Most economic models used by central banks prior to the recent financial crisis omitted two fundamental
More informationECON : Topics in Monetary Economics
ECON 882-11: Topics in Monetary Economics Department of Economics Duke University Fall 2015 Instructor: Kyle Jurado E-mail: kyle.jurado@duke.edu Lectures: M/W 1:25pm-2:40pm Classroom: Perkins 065 (classroom
More informationEmpirically Evaluating Economic Policy in Real Time. The Martin Feldstein Lecture 1 National Bureau of Economic Research July 10, John B.
Empirically Evaluating Economic Policy in Real Time The Martin Feldstein Lecture 1 National Bureau of Economic Research July 10, 2009 John B. Taylor To honor Martin Feldstein s distinguished leadership
More informationChannels of Monetary Policy Transmission. Konstantinos Drakos, MacroFinance, Monetary Policy Transmission 1
Channels of Monetary Policy Transmission Konstantinos Drakos, MacroFinance, Monetary Policy Transmission 1 Discusses the transmission mechanism of monetary policy, i.e. how changes in the central bank
More informationDiscussion of Limitations on the Effectiveness of Forward Guidance at the Zero Lower Bound
Discussion of Limitations on the Effectiveness of Forward Guidance at the Zero Lower Bound Robert G. King Boston University and NBER 1. Introduction What should the monetary authority do when prices are
More informationTHE POLICY RULE MIX: A MACROECONOMIC POLICY EVALUATION. John B. Taylor Stanford University
THE POLICY RULE MIX: A MACROECONOMIC POLICY EVALUATION by John B. Taylor Stanford University October 1997 This draft was prepared for the Robert A. Mundell Festschrift Conference, organized by Guillermo
More informationHave We Underestimated the Likelihood and Severity of Zero Lower Bound Events?
Have We Underestimated the Likelihood and Severity of Zero Lower Bound Events? Hess Chung, Jean Philippe Laforte, David Reifschneider, and John C. Williams 19th Annual Symposium of the Society for Nonlinear
More informationA New Characterization of the U.S. Macroeconomic and Monetary Policy Outlook 1
A New Characterization of the U.S. Macroeconomic and Monetary Policy Outlook 1 James Bullard President and CEO Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Society of Business Economists Annual Dinner June 30, 2016
More informationRemarks on Monetary Policy Challenges. Bank of England Conference on Challenges to Central Banks in the 21st Century
Remarks on Monetary Policy Challenges Bank of England Conference on Challenges to Central Banks in the 21st Century John B. Taylor Stanford University March 26, 2013 It is an honor to participate in this
More informationMonetary Policy Report: Using Rules for Benchmarking
Monetary Policy Report: Using Rules for Benchmarking Michael Dotsey Senior Vice President and Director of Research Charles I. Plosser President and CEO Keith Sill Vice President and Director, Real-Time
More informationMonetary Policy Frameworks
Monetary Policy Frameworks Loretta J. Mester President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Panel Remarks for the National Association for Business Economics and American Economic
More informationVolume 35, Issue 4. Real-Exchange-Rate-Adjusted Inflation Targeting in an Open Economy: Some Analytical Results
Volume 35, Issue 4 Real-Exchange-Rate-Adjusted Inflation Targeting in an Open Economy: Some Analytical Results Richard T Froyen University of North Carolina Alfred V Guender University of Canterbury Abstract
More informationThe Economic Outlook and The Fed s Roles in Monetary Policy and Financial Stability
1 The Economic Outlook and The Fed s Roles in Monetary Policy and Financial Stability Main Line Chamber of Commerce Economic Forecast Breakfast Philadelphia Country Club, Gladwyne, PA January 8, 2008 Charles
More informationIt is a pleasure and an honor to be invited to participate in this conference.
Current Challenges for U.S. Monetary Policy J. Alfred Broaddus, Jr. It is a pleasure and an honor to be invited to participate in this conference. I last visited Vienna in 1962, when I was a Fulbright
More informationGlobal Monetary and Financial Stability Policy. Fall 2012 Professor Zvi Eckstein FNCE 893/393
Global Monetary and Financial Stability Policy Fall 2012 Professor Zvi Eckstein FNCE 893/393 September 5, 2012 to October 18, 2012 Office hours: SH-DH room 2336, Tuesday 4:30 6:00 pm, by appointment Email:
More informationOpening Remarks. Alan Greenspan
Opening Remarks Alan Greenspan Uncertainty is not just an important feature of the monetary policy landscape; it is the defining characteristic of that landscape. As a consequence, the conduct of monetary
More informationShould Central Banks Respond to Movements in Asset Prices?
QUANTITATIVE POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF NEW NORMATIVE MACROECONOMIC RESEARCHt Should Central Banks Respond to Movements in Asset Prices? In recent decades, asset booms and busts have been important factors
More informationEcon 210C: Macroeconomic Theory
Econ 210C: Macroeconomic Theory Giacomo Rondina (Part I) Econ 306, grondina@ucsd.edu Davide Debortoli (Part II) Econ 225, ddebortoli@ucsd.edu M-W, 11:00am-12:20pm, Econ 300 This course is divided into
More informationMonetary Economics Semester 2, 2003
316-466 Monetary Economics Semester 2, 2003 Instructor Chris Edmond Office Hours: Wed 1:00pm - 3:00pm, Economics and Commerce Rm 419 Email: Prerequisites 316-312 Macroeconomics
More informationBrian P Sack: Managing the Federal Reserve s balance sheet
Brian P Sack: Managing the Federal Reserve s balance sheet Remarks by Mr Brian P Sack, Executive Vice President of the Markets Group of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, at the 2010 Chartered Financial
More informationInternational macroeconomics has been profoundly affected by the emerging
IMF Staff Papers Vol. 50, Special Issue 2003 International Monetary Fund Comment on IS-LM-BP in the Pampas MICHAEL DEVEREUX * International macroeconomics has been profoundly affected by the emerging market
More informationFRBSF Economic Letter
FRBSF Economic Letter 2017-17 June 19, 2017 Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco New Evidence for a Lower New Normal in Interest Rates Jens H.E. Christensen and Glenn D. Rudebusch Interest
More informationFirm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities, and the Taylor Principle
Firm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities, and the Taylor Principle Tommy Sveen Lutz Weinke June 1, 2006 Abstract In the presence of firm-specific capital the Taylor principle can generate multiple equilibria.
More informationFabrizio Perri University of Minnesota, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, NBER and CEPR February 2011
Comment on: Monetary Policy and the Global Housing Bubble by Jane Dokko, Brian Doyle, Michael Kiley, Jinill Kim, Shane Sherlund, Jae Sim and Skander Van Den Heuvel Fabrizio Perri University of Minnesota,
More informationEE 631: MONETARY ECONOMICS 2 nd Semester 2013
EE 631: MONETARY ECONOMICS 2 nd Semester 2013 Times/location: Wed 9:30 am 12:30 pm Office: 60 th Building, Room #16 Phone: 02-613-2471 E-mail: pisut@econ.tu.ac.th Office Hours: Wed 1:30 4:30 pm or by appointment
More informationGlobal Monetary and Financial Stability Policy
Global Monetary and Financial Stability Policy Fall 2016 Professor Zvi Eckstein FNCE 893/393 August 30, 2015 to October 13, 2015 Office hours: SH-DH room 2336, Tuesday 4:30 6:00 pm, by appointment Email:
More informationTHE ROLE OF EXCHANGE RATES IN MONETARY POLICY RULE: THE CASE OF INFLATION TARGETING COUNTRIES
THE ROLE OF EXCHANGE RATES IN MONETARY POLICY RULE: THE CASE OF INFLATION TARGETING COUNTRIES Mahir Binici Central Bank of Turkey Istiklal Cad. No:10 Ulus, Ankara/Turkey E-mail: mahir.binici@tcmb.gov.tr
More informationCredit Shocks and the U.S. Business Cycle. Is This Time Different? Raju Huidrom University of Virginia. Midwest Macro Conference
Credit Shocks and the U.S. Business Cycle: Is This Time Different? Raju Huidrom University of Virginia May 31, 214 Midwest Macro Conference Raju Huidrom Credit Shocks and the U.S. Business Cycle Background
More informationMonetary Economics: Macro Aspects, 19/ Henrik Jensen Department of Economics University of Copenhagen
Monetary Economics: Macro Aspects, 19/5 2009 Henrik Jensen Department of Economics University of Copenhagen Open-economy Aspects (II) 1. The Obstfeld and Rogo two-country model with sticky prices 2. An
More informationCommentary: Using models for monetary policy. analysis
Commentary: Using models for monetary policy analysis Carl E. Walsh U. C. Santa Cruz September 2009 This draft: Oct. 26, 2009 Modern policy analysis makes extensive use of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium
More informationUCSC Spring Topics in Macroeconomics
Economics 105 Professor K. Kletzer UCSC Spring 2015 Introduction: Topics in Macroeconomics This course will use the tools of macroeconomics to address current questions in economic policy debates. These
More informationImplications of Globalization for Monetary Policy. Academic Consultants Meeting Federal Reserve Board
Implications of Globalization for Monetary Policy Academic Consultants Meeting Federal Reserve Board John B. Taylor Stanford University 28 September 2006 The purpose of this note is to provide some background
More informationImplications of Globalization for Monetary Policy. Academic Consultants Meeting Federal Reserve Board
Implications of Globalization for Monetary Policy Academic Consultants Meeting Federal Reserve Board John B. Taylor Stanford University 28 September 2006 The purpose of this note is to provide some background
More informationIMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Monetary Policy in a Changing Economy: Indicators, Rules, and the Shift Towards Intangible Output James H. STOCK Discussion Paper No. 99-E-13 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC
More informationMonetary Policy and Financial Stability Connections. James Clouse Division of Monetary Affairs Board of Governors
Monetary Policy and Financial Stability Connections James Clouse Division of Monetary Affairs Board of Governors Evolving Views Pre-Crisis Financial stability critically important but Very difficult to
More informationECON MACROECONOMIC THEORY Instructor: Dr. Juergen Jung Towson University
ECON 310 - MACROECONOMIC THEORY Instructor: Dr. Juergen Jung Towson University Dr. Juergen Jung ECON 310 - Macroeconomic Theory Towson University 1 / 36 Disclaimer These lecture notes are customized for
More informationUsing Models for Monetary Policy Analysis
Using Models for Monetary Policy Analysis Carl E. Walsh University of California, Santa Cruz Modern policy analysis makes extensive use of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. These models
More informationThe Effectiveness of Government Spending in Deep Recessions: A New Keynesian Perspective*
The Effectiveness of Government Spending in Deep Recessions: A New Keynesian Perspective* BY KEITH KUESTER s the recent recession unfolded, policymakers in the U.S. and abroad employed both monetary and
More informationRe-Normalize, Don t New-Normalize Monetary Policy. John B. Taylor. Economics Working Paper 14109
Re-Normalize, Don t New-Normalize Monetary Policy John B. Taylor Economics Working Paper 14109 HOOVER INSTITUTION 434 GALVEZ MALL STANFORD UNIVERSITY STANFORD, CA 94305-6010 April 2014 This paper is a
More informationCommentary: Housing is the Business Cycle
Commentary: Housing is the Business Cycle Frank Smets Prof. Leamer s paper is witty, provocative and very timely. It is also written with a certain passion. Now, passion and central banking do not necessarily
More informationRemarks on Monetary Policy Challenges
This work is distributed as a Discussion Paper by the STANFORD INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 12-032 Remarks on Monetary Policy Challenges By John B. Taylor Stanford
More informationApplication of Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk Model to Kenyan Stocks: A Comparative Study
American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 2017; 6(3): 150-155 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajtas doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20170603.13 ISSN: 2326-8999 (Print); ISSN: 2326-9006 (Online)
More informationCorporate Investment and Portfolio Returns in Japan: A Markov Switching Approach
Corporate Investment and Portfolio Returns in Japan: A Markov Switching Approach 1 Faculty of Economics, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan Chikashi Tsuji 1 Correspondence: Chikashi Tsuji, Professor, Faculty
More informationAdvanced Macroeconomics III (second half)
Barcelona GSE-Universitat Pompeu Fabra Professor Jordi Galí (23.303, jgali@crei.cat) O ce hours: by appointment (crojas@upf.edu) Mon-Tu, 11:00-13:00 Spring 2018 Advanced Macroeconomics III (second half)
More informationThe U.S. Economy: An Optimistic Outlook, But With Some Important Risks
EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:10 A.M. Eastern Time on Friday, April 13, 2018 OR UPON DELIVERY The U.S. Economy: An Optimistic Outlook, But With Some Important Risks Eric S. Rosengren President & Chief Executive Officer
More informationTeaching Inflation Targeting: An Analysis for Intermediate Macro. Carl E. Walsh * First draft: September 2000 This draft: July 2001
Teaching Inflation Targeting: An Analysis for Intermediate Macro Carl E. Walsh * First draft: September 2000 This draft: July 2001 * Professor of Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz, and Visiting
More informationAdvanced Macroeconomics II
Universitat Pompeu Fabra Primavera 2014 Professor Lorenza Rossi (23.302) E-mail: lorenza.rossi@eco.unipv.it website: http://economia.unipv.it/pagp/pagine_personali/lorenza.rossi/ Visites: contact via email
More informationCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS. Professor Frederic S. Mishkin Fall 1999 Uris Hall 619 Extension:
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Professor Frederic S. Mishkin Fall 1999 Uris Hall 619 Extension: 4-3488 E-mail: fsm3@columbia.edu Money and Financial Markets B9353 EMPIRICAL METHODS IN
More informationThe Economy, Inflation, and Monetary Policy
The views expressed today are my own and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve System or the FOMC. Good afternoon, I m pleased to be here today. I am also delighted to be in Philadelphia. While
More informationImproving the Use of Discretion in Monetary Policy
Improving the Use of Discretion in Monetary Policy Frederic S. Mishkin Graduate School of Business, Columbia University And National Bureau of Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Annual Conference,
More informationThe B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics
The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Special Issue: Long-Term Effects of the Great Recession Volume 12, Issue 3 2012 Article 3 First Discussant Comment on The Statistical Behavior of GDP after Financial
More informationA Singular Achievement of Recent Monetary Policy
A Singular Achievement of Recent Monetary Policy James Bullard President and CEO, FRB-St. Louis Theodore and Rita Combs Distinguished Lecture Series in Economics 20 September 2012 University of Notre Dame
More informationThe Long-run Optimal Degree of Indexation in the New Keynesian Model
The Long-run Optimal Degree of Indexation in the New Keynesian Model Guido Ascari University of Pavia Nicola Branzoli University of Pavia October 27, 2006 Abstract This note shows that full price indexation
More informationDiscussion of Tracking Monetary-Fiscal Interactions across Time and Space
Discussion of Tracking Monetary-Fiscal Interactions across Time and Space Troy Davig Rokos Capital Management Monetary-fiscal interactions arise in a number of dimensions. Poorly managed, they can generate
More informationFRBSF Economic Letter
FRBSF Economic Letter 18-7 December, 18 Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco A Review of the Fed s Unconventional Monetary Policy Glenn D. Rudebusch The Federal Reserve has typically
More informationMonetary Economics July 2014
ECON40013 ECON90011 Monetary Economics July 2014 Chris Edmond Office hours: by appointment Office: Business & Economics 423 Phone: 8344 9733 Email: cedmond@unimelb.edu.au Course description This year I
More informationBGSE Macroeconomics I
BGSE Macroeconomics I Prof. Keith Kuester Winter term, 2015/16 Outline: This first part of the PhD macro sequence is aimed at introducing students to basic techniques, concepts, and workhorse models in
More informationThe Importance of Being Predictable. John B. Taylor Stanford University. Remarks Prepared for the Policy Panel on Monetary Policy Under Uncertainty
The Importance of Being Predictable John B. Taylor Stanford University Remarks Prepared for the Policy Panel on Monetary Policy Under Uncertainty 23 rd Annual Policy Conference Federal Reserve Bank of
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL33112 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Economic Effects of Raising National Saving October 4, 2005 Brian W. Cashell Specialist in Quantitative Economics Government
More informationWilliam C Dudley: Financial conditions indexes a new look after the financial crisis
William C Dudley: Financial conditions indexes a new look after the financial crisis Remarks by Mr William C Dudley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, at the
More informationMacrostability Ratings: A Preliminary Proposal
Macrostability Ratings: A Preliminary Proposal Gary H. Stern* President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Ron Feldman* Senior Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Editor s note: The too-big-to-fail
More informationChapter 2. Literature Review
Chapter 2 Literature Review There is a wide agreement that monetary policy is a tool in promoting economic growth and stabilizing inflation. However, there is less agreement about how monetary policy exactly
More informationFRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER 011- August 1, 011 Does Headline Inflation Converge to Core? BY ZHENG LIU AND JUSTIN WEIDNER Recent surges in food and energy prices have pushed up headline inflation to levels well
More informationThe trade balance and fiscal policy in the OECD
European Economic Review 42 (1998) 887 895 The trade balance and fiscal policy in the OECD Philip R. Lane *, Roberto Perotti Economics Department, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland Columbia University,
More informationPanel on. Policymaking in a Global Context. Remarks by. Robert T. Parry. President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Panel on Policymaking in a Global Context Remarks by Robert T. Parry President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Delivered at the conference on Crises, Contagion, and Coordination:
More informationHas the Inflation Process Changed?
Has the Inflation Process Changed? by S. Cecchetti and G. Debelle Discussion by I. Angeloni (ECB) * Cecchetti and Debelle (CD) could hardly have chosen a more relevant and timely topic for their paper.
More informationSupply-side effects of monetary policy and the central bank s objective function. Eurilton Araújo
Supply-side effects of monetary policy and the central bank s objective function Eurilton Araújo Insper Working Paper WPE: 23/2008 Copyright Insper. Todos os direitos reservados. É proibida a reprodução
More informationBen S Bernanke: Modern risk management and banking supervision
Ben S Bernanke: Modern risk management and banking supervision Remarks by Mr Ben S Bernanke, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System, at the Stonier Graduate School of Banking,
More informationMonetary Policy Report: Using Rules for Benchmarking
Monetary Policy Report: Using Rules for Benchmarking Michael Dotsey Executive Vice President and Director of Research Keith Sill Senior Vice President and Director, Real Time Data Research Center Federal
More informationSome Considerations for U.S. Monetary Policy Normalization
Some Considerations for U.S. Monetary Policy Normalization James Bullard President and CEO, FRB-St. Louis 24 th Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference on the State of the US and World Economies 15 April 2015
More informationRethinking Stabilization Policy An Introduction to the Bank s 2002 Economic Symposium
Rethinking Stabilization Policy An Introduction to the Bank s 2002 Economic Symposium Gordon H. Sellon, Jr. After a period of prominence in the 1960s, the view that fiscal and monetary stabilization policies
More information