Macrostability Ratings: A Preliminary Proposal
|
|
- Kerry Tucker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Macrostability Ratings: A Preliminary Proposal Gary H. Stern* President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Ron Feldman* Senior Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Editor s note: The too-big-to-fail problem has received much public attention in recent times, and of course Gary Stern and Ron Feldman, president and senior vice president of the Minneapolis Fed, have long warned of the TBTF problem in the Region and elsewhere. Stern and Feldman emphasize that policymakers often feel compelled to bail out weak financial institutions because of concerns that spillovers from one failing institution will contribute to the collapse of linked institutions, leading to broader financial instability. In the following article, Stern and Feldman provide initial thoughts about managing such spillovers by devising a macrostability rating system for bank holding companies. A company s rating would assess the potential magnitude of financial spillover should that company fail. Implementing this sort of rating system would focus the attention of the government agency designated as macroprudential supervisor on the mitigation of spillovers, argue Stern and Feldman, and ultimately diminish the motivation for bailouts. The article outlines their approach, explains the rationale and addresses possible critiques. The proposal 1. The macroprudential supervisor (MS) would assign a macrostability rating to all or some holding companies (HCs) where the HCs or major subsidiaries engage in financial activities. 1 These entities would include, for example, bank HCs, thrift HCs, insurance HCs, HC-owned broker/dealers or investment banks, and HC-owned investment managers. a. Assigning one rating per organization would keep the regime simple without curtailing the provision of key information. The text accompanying the rating (see below) would specify the organizational source of potential spillovers (e.g., at the HC or subsidiary level and which subsidiary). Supervisory or credit ratings would distinguish between HCs and subsidiaries to account for (1) legal entity distinctions that pervade the regulatory/legal environment in which HCs and subsidiaries operate, (2) the supervisory/regulatory assignments granted to various government agencies, (3) the inability of the subsidiary rating to capture the financial and operational condition of the overall organization, and (4) the issuance of securities by various legal entities. Because the macrostability rating does not purport to assess the financial condition of any legal entity or tie into a broader legal/regulatory framework, these rationales do not apply to it. b. While the MS may decide to issue macrostability ratings for a large number of HCs, we assume it would do so largely by identifying those HCs that pose material risk of spillovers, analyzing these HCs in some detail * The authors thank Dick Todd for helpful comments. SEPTEMBER
2 Spillovers from one failing institution may contribute to the collapse of linked institutions, leading to broader financial instability. 13
3 and categorizing the vast majority of other HCs as posing no material risk of producing spillovers. c. We would encourage the MS to take a broad and practical view of financial activities when determining which HCs to assess. The MS must determine whether a given firm s operational and financial challenges would create spillovers in the eyes of policymakers confronted with the firm s potential demise. Under this approach, the MS may find that a firm has the potential to produce spillovers even if the firm does not have classic signs of spillover potential (e.g., does not fund long-term assets with short-term funding). 2. The rating would assess the magnitude of potential spillovers that would arise if the HC or its subsidiaries faced serious operational and financial difficulties (i.e., spillovers conditional on failure or near failure). In assessing the rating, the MS would have to consider several types of spillovers, including but not limited to the following: a. Spillovers that arise because of direct losses imposed on counterparties of the HC/major subsidiaries. b. Effects that challenges at one HC/major subsidiary would impose on other financial institutions even if they do not have a direct exposure to it. For example, would concerns about the HC under consideration lead to run-like behavior at other institutions? c. The potential effect that challenges at one institution would have on capital markets in terms of clearing, settlement and other back office operations, as well as other aspects of market operations (e.g., liquidity). d. The vulnerability of the HC/major subsidiary to fire sales or other negative feedback loops arising out of capital market asset holdings or funding dependence (i.e., shocks to the value of an asset held by many large financial institutions lead to sales of the asset that depress the asset s value, leading to more sales). e. Spillovers from the financial sector to the real economy. Such spillovers would include the effect of difficulties of a given financial institution on the liquidity of households and firms, the provision of credit and the availability of other services that provide material benefits to households and firms (e.g., hedging). Analysis of these spillovers would review both the immediate effects of disruption and the ability of other providers of services to compensate for supply reductions. f. Finally, while perhaps not a spillover in the same sense as the previous items, additional factors that can prevent the least-cost resolution from occurring should also be considered by the MS. These factors would include, for example, the potential for ring-fencing in overseas operations that might prevent standard resolution techniques from being implemented. We recognize the daunting nature of this task and discuss that challenge below. 3. The rating would not assess in any way the current condition of the HC or its subsidiaries. 4. Before assessing institutions for their potential for producing spillovers and rating them as such, the MS would publish for comment the factors it will consider in making the determination. Articulating these factors for consideration represents a core responsibility for the MS and, as such, we will not attempt to produce a list of the factors ourselves. That said, we would anticipate that factors such as organizational and legal structure, geographic scope of operations, the type of activities engaged in by the HC or its subsidiaries and the level of the firm s engagement in those activities would receive consideration, although certainly with more specificity in whatever final list the MS creates. a. The initial list would go through the public comment process and incorporate feedback received from interested parties. We think the MS should revisit the factors on an annual basis, at least for the first several years of its existence. b. We see merit in having the MS incorporate the factors believed to generate spillovers into the rating itself. One option the MS should consider is creating subcomponents for the macrostability rating based on the factors. Such a rating SEPTEMBER
4 would contribute to transparency in the rating process. c. We have supported and continue to support requiring financial institutions to document how a receiver could wind down its operations with minimal disruption to the financial system and the rest of the economy. A review of this plan should take a central role in assignment of the macrostability rating. d. The rating should incorporate empirical measures of the interconnectedness of firms The MS would provide a written document explaining the reasoning behind the rating(s) to the institution. 6. The MS would determine the form the rating takes, but we would encourage the MS to make it clear through the nomenclature used that the macrostability rating differs from existing supervisory ratings. 7. The MS would rely on the primary supervisor(s) for key information in setting the rating. That said, the MS has accountability for producing the rating and should have the legal authority to acquire whatever information it needs to produce the rating. 8. The MS would have an explicit statutory and/or regulatory objective of taking actions that reduce the rating (i.e., reduce the potential for spillovers). The MS would have to report to Congress semiannually on progress in meeting this objective. 9. Policymakers would have to consider the benefits and costs of making the rating public, a policy we discuss briefly at the conclusion of this document. Rationales We believe that the threat of spillovers drives the provision of ex post government support for uninsured creditors of systemically important financial institutions. This view has become the consensus assessment over the past year. The moral hazard created by this support can result in costly resource misallocation. We have long argued that addressing this problem requires policymakers to take steps in advance of a financial crisis to reduce the threat of spillovers, recognizing that government cannot eliminate spillovers completely and maintain a vibrant financial sector. Macrostability ratings would facilitate reductions of spillovers in several ways: 1. Provision of the ratings would focus the MS on assessment and management of spillovers. The ratings would help prioritize the activities of the MS in the likely face of significant pressure to take on a wide range of activities, including many traditional safety and soundness operations. The ratings would also require the MS to take on firm-specific activities and operations as opposed to focusing on general pronouncements on overall conditions, potential macro threats to stability and the like, which may not lend themselves as readily to action to reduce spillovers. 2. The need to report on action taken to reduce spillovers would help anchor creditor expectations, put public pressure on the MS to address costly perceptions of the potential for ex post government support and foster transparency in the activities of the MS. Transparency would force the MS to clearly identify those aspects of financial institution activity that pose systemic risk that makes action to address these factors more likely. These desired outcomes might also justify making the ratings themselves public. 3. The macrostability ratings would facilitate pricing of systemic risk/spillover potential through a deposit insurance premium or other tax. We prefer such pricing to charges for too-big-to-fail status, but supervisors could also incorporate the rating into the setting of capital charges and other standards applied to systemically important firms. The intent of such direct or indirect pricing, in our minds, is to encourage the financial institution to take steps that reduce systemic risk (e.g., adopting corporate structures that make spillovers less likely). Response to potential weaknesses/ open questions 1. Some observers have argued that analysts cannot identify the potential for spillovers with material accuracy. 3 If true, the MS will waste resources producing macrostability ratings. While we agree that 15 SEPTEMBER 2009
5 our proposal faces real challenges in implementation, we do not find this view compelling. First, we think it runs counter to recent experience. For example, failure simulation exercises conducted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. identified a number of the institutional factors that led policymakers to provide extraordinary support for creditors (e.g., complex legal organizations, overseas operations). The failure in policy arose from the lack of follow-up rather than from identification. Second, while there has been some analytical work on spillovers, which we just noted, we have seen relatively few resources devoted to spillover identification and response. Claims of an inability to identify spillovers, therefore, rely on intuition rather than actual experience. We do not discount the value of intuition, but given the costs associated with systemic risk, trying a new approach which also has its roots in our intuition and reviewing our experience with it seems justified. Third, alternative approaches to identifying spillovers seem as daunting as the one we recommend. Advocates for enhanced forms of traditional supervision and regulation must justify faith in a process that has failed, in an extreme and systemic way, twice in the past two decades. Moreover, such an approach requires government agencies to effectively determine optimal levels of risk-taking, which seems challenging to say the least. Finally, rating agencies have long provided plausible assessments of the likelihood that governments will provide support to creditors of systemically important financial institutions, which suggests that the task is not impossible. 2. We have raised the potential of making the rating public. Even if an observer thought there was merit in assessing the potential for spillovers via a rating regime, the observer might object to making that rating public. Publicizing the ratings could make the moral hazard problem worse by clarifying which institutions, if they faced financial/operational difficulties, raise the greatest threat of spillovers. We agree that making the macrostability ratings public could have that effect, which might be an argument against such publication. Alternatively, the ratings could reduce moral hazard by providing evidence to creditors that they will not receive the support they had anticipated. 4 On the margin, making the ratings public might put pressure on the government to reduce expected support, although our proposal seeks to create that pressure through a statutory/regulatory requirement as well. There is also the question, given the extensive amount of support provided by the government to creditors of systemically important banks over the past two years, of whether publicizing the ratings will actually expand expected support beyond what creditors already anticipate. Deciding whether to make the ratings public ultimately depends on policymakers success in otherwise making the potential for ex post government support for creditors ambiguous enough to justify a program of constructive ambiguity. If creditors see little ambiguity or chance of taking losses, then making the ratings public could help. If policymakers can convince creditors that they have real chances of losses through other means, then identifying the potential for spillovers on a case-by-case basis may actually increase expectations of bailouts. Summation Trying to address the too-big-to-fail problem by better managing/mitigating spillovers should be among the highest priorities for policymakers. Directing the macroprudential supervisor to achieve this goal offers one strategy worth following. We have proposed creating and publishing a macrostability rating because we think it would focus the macroprudential supervisor on spillover mitigation and therefore help address the too-bigto-fail problem. R June 16, 2009 SEPTEMBER
6 Endnotes 1 Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke defined and provided a context for macroprudential supervision in a recent speech. Financial stability, however, could be further enhanced by a more explicitly macroprudential approach to financial regulation and supervision in the United States. Macroprudential policies focus on risks to the financial system as a whole. Such risks may be crosscutting, affecting a number of firms and markets, or they may be concentrated in a few key areas. A macroprudential approach would complement and build on the current regulatory and supervisory structure, in which the primary focus is the safety and soundness of individual institutions and markets. See Ben S. Bernanke, 2009, Financial Reform to Address Systemic Risk, March 10. Online at federalreserve.gov under News & Events. 2 For one example, see Tobias Adrian and Markus K. Brunnermeier, 2009, CoVaR, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 348, May 27. Online at newyorkfed.org under Research. 3 See Alan Greenspan, 2009, Remarks on Systemic Risk, June 3. Online at aei.org/speeches. 4 A traditional reason for not publicizing supervisory ratings they focus on the underlying soundness of the institution would not apply in the case of the macrostability ratings. These ratings have more similarities to the assessments of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act, which supervisors do make public. 17 SEPTEMBER 2009
Limiting Spillovers Through Focused Supervision
T O P O F T H E N I N T H T O P O F T H E N I N T H Limiting Spillovers Through Focused Supervision Gary H. Stern President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis In our Bank s 2007 Annual Report, I expressed
FINANCIAL SECURITY AND STABILITY
FINANCIAL SECURITY AND STABILITY Durmuş Yılmaz Governor Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies: The OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy
EC248-Financial Innovations and Monetary Policy Assignment. Andrew Townsend
EC248-Financial Innovations and Monetary Policy Assignment Discuss the concept of too big to fail within the financial sector. What are the arguments in favour of this concept, and what are possible negative
Too-Big-to-Fail: The Role of Metrics 1
Too-Big-to-Fail: The Role of Metrics 1 Quantifying the Too Big to Fail Subsidy Workshop Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Minneapolis, Minnesota November 18, 2013 Narayana Kocherlakota President Federal
Ben S Bernanke: Modern risk management and banking supervision
Ben S Bernanke: Modern risk management and banking supervision Remarks by Mr Ben S Bernanke, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System, at the Stonier Graduate School of Banking,
Payment Economics and the Role of Central Banks Bank of England Payments Conference London, England May 20, 2005
Payment Economics and the Role of Central Banks Bank of England Payments Conference London, England May 20, 2005 Jeffrey M. Lacker President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond I would like start by commending
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE. Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department. August 2012 (updated July 2013)
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department August 2012 (updated July 2013) Table of Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. Internal Capital Adequacy
International Conference. Bank Resolution and Public Awareness on Deposit Insurance. X Annual Meeting of the Asia-Pacific Regional Committee
Jerzy Pruski President of the Management Board Bank Guarantee Fund (Poland) Vice Chair of the Executive Council International Association of Deposit Insurers International Conference Bank Resolution and
Federal and International Insurance Issues
Federal and International Insurance Issues Their Potential Impact on State-Based Guaranty Funds, the Policyholders They Protect and What Comes Next Roger H. Schmelzer, J.D. President & CEO, NCIGF NCIGF
The Economy, Inflation, and Monetary Policy
The views expressed today are my own and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve System or the FOMC. Good afternoon, I m pleased to be here today. I am also delighted to be in Philadelphia. While
Progress on Addressing Too Big To Fail
EMBARGOED UNTIL February 4, 2016 at 2:15 A.M. U.S. Eastern Time and 9:15 A.M. in Cape Town, South Africa OR UPON DELIVERY Progress on Addressing Too Big To Fail Eric S. Rosengren President & Chief Executive
Systemic Risk: Relevance, Risk Management Challenges and Open Questions. Tom Daula, Chief Risk Officer
Systemic Risk: Relevance, Risk Management Challenges and Open Questions Tom Daula, Chief Risk Officer Systemic Risk Definition: financial system instability, potentially catastrophic, caused or exacerbated
Monetary Policy Revised: January 9, 2008
Global Economy Chris Edmond Monetary Policy Revised: January 9, 2008 In most countries, central banks manage interest rates in an attempt to produce stable and predictable prices. In some countries they
Identifying and Mitigating Systemic Risks: A framework for macro-prudential supervision. R. Barry Johnston
Identifying and Mitigating Systemic Risks: A framework for macro-prudential supervision R. Barry Johnston Financial crisis highlighted the need to focus on systemic risk Unprecedented reach of the financial
Keynote Address As Prepared for Delivery - The 2015 NAIC International Insurance Forum -
Washington D.C., May 21, 2015 Keynote Address As Prepared for Delivery - The 2015 NAIC International Insurance Forum - Masamichi Kono Vice Minister for International Affairs Financial Services Agency,
Taxing Risk* Narayana Kocherlakota. President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Economic Club of Minnesota. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Taxing Risk* Narayana Kocherlakota President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Economic Club of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota May 10, 2010 *This topic is discussed in greater depth in "Taxing Risk
Policy and the Economy in the Wake of the Shock. Gary H. Stern President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Policy and the Economy in the Wake of the Shock Gary H. Stern President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Escanaba, Michigan October 21, 2008 and Houghton, Michigan October 16, 2008 Introduction In the
14. What Use Can Be Made of the Specific FSIs?
14. What Use Can Be Made of the Specific FSIs? Introduction 14.1 The previous chapter explained the need for FSIs and how they fit into the wider concept of macroprudential analysis. This chapter considers
Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions
Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions Recovery of financial market infrastructures October 2014 (Revised July 2017) This publication
Financial stability: how to lean against the wind?
Financial stability: how to lean against the wind? Zdeněk Tůma Sinaia, 15 th November 2012 Main points Institutional framework Central bank as natural harbour Way of thinking Processes and decision making
Is it implementing Basel II or do we need Basell III? BBA Annual Internacional Banking Conference. José María Roldán Director General de Regulación
London, 30 June 2009 Is it implementing Basel II or do we need Basell III? BBA Annual Internacional Banking Conference José María Roldán Director General de Regulación It is a pleasure to join you today
Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell: The road less travelled exploring the nexus of macro-prudential and monetary policy
Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell: The road less travelled exploring the nexus of macro-prudential and monetary policy Speech by Ms Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central
Key Aspects of Macroprudential Policy
Seminar for Senior Bank Supervisors from Emerging Markets WB/IMF/Federal Reserve October 2016 1 Key Aspects of Macroprudential Policy Luis I. Jácome H. Monetary and Capital Markets Department International
EUROPEAN COMMISSION S CONSULTATION ON HEDGE FUNDS EUROSYSTEM CONTRIBUTION
25 February 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION S CONSULTATION ON HEDGE FUNDS EUROSYSTEM CONTRIBUTION As a part of a wider review of the regulatory and supervisory framework for EU financial markets, the European
11 th July 2011
Pinners Hall 105-108 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1EX tel: + 44 (0)20 7216 8947 fax: + 44 (2)20 7216 8928 web: www.ibfed.org Mr Svein Andresen Secretary General Financial Stability Board c/o Bank for International
A Nonsupervisory Framework to Monitor Financial Stability
A Nonsupervisory Framework to Monitor Financial Stability Tobias Adrian, Daniel Covitz, Nellie Liang Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Federal Reserve Board June 11, 2012 The views in this presentation
Will Regulatory Reform Prevent Future Crises?
Will Regulatory Reform Prevent Future Crises? James Bullard President and CEO CFA Virginia Society February 23, 2010 Richmond, Virginia. Any opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 119
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 119 Note: This Statement has been completely superseded FAS119 Status Page FAS119 Summary Disclosure about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value
Opening Remarks. Alan Greenspan
Opening Remarks Alan Greenspan Uncertainty is not just an important feature of the monetary policy landscape; it is the defining characteristic of that landscape. As a consequence, the conduct of monetary
Susan Schmidt Bies: An update on Basel II implementation in the United States
Susan Schmidt Bies: An update on Basel II implementation in the United States Remarks by Ms Susan Schmidt Bies, Member of the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System, at the Global Association
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process)
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process) Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord Issued for comment by 31 May 2001 January 2001 Table
Simplicity and Complexity in Capital Regulation
EMBARGOED UNTIL Monday, Nov. 18, 2013, at 1 AM U.S. Eastern Time and 10 AM in Abu Dhabi, or upon delivery Simplicity and Complexity in Capital Regulation Eric S. Rosengren President & Chief Executive Officer
The Role of Foreign Financial Institutions in Japan's Financial System
September 29, 2014 Bank of Japan The Role of Foreign Financial Institutions in Japan's Financial System Speech at a Meeting Held by the International Bankers Association of Japan Haruhiko Kuroda Governor
Commentary. Philip E. Strahan. 1. Introduction. 2. Market Discipline from Public Equity
Philip E. Strahan Commentary P 1. Introduction articipants at this conference debated the merits of market discipline in contributing to a solution to banks tendency to take too much risk, the so-called
GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES
SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES: 2016 Issued: 2 August 2016 GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Central Bank of The Bahamas ( the
Basis for Conclusions. Financial Instruments Section PS July 2011 PSAB. Page 1 of 16
Financial Instruments Section PS 3450 July 2011 PSAB Page 1 of 16 FOREWORD CICA Public Sector Accounting Handbook Revisions Release No. 34, issued in June 2011, included a new standard, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS,
For further questions, please contact Paulina Przewoska, senior policy analyst at Finance Watch.
Finance Watch response to FSB s consultation on Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in resolution Brussels, 30 January 2015 Finance Watch is an independent, non-profit
that each of you in the audience is finding it to be well worth your time.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE'S PERSPECTIVE ON FOREIGN BANK REGULATION Remarks by Robert P. Forrestal President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Conference
Nonbank SIFIs? The Case of Life Insurance
Nonbank SIFIs? The Case of Life Insurance Scott E. Harrington Alan B. Miller Professor Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Regulating Non-Bank Systemically Important Financial Institutions The Brookings
Remarks of Nout Wellink Chairman, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision President, De Nederlandsche Bank
Remarks of Nout Wellink Chairman, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision President, De Nederlandsche Bank Korea FSB Financial Reform Conference: An Emerging Market Perspective Seoul, Republic of Korea
March 17, Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland
State Street Corporation Stefan M. Gavell Executive Vice President and Head of Regulatory, Industry and Government Affairs State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111-2900 Telephone:
Intesa Sanpaolo response to the European Commission
Intesa Sanpaolo response to the European Commission Consultation on a Possible Recovery and Resolution Framework for Financial Institutions other than Banks December 2012 REGISTERED ORGANIZATION N 24037141789-48
Impact Assessment Case Study. Short Selling
Impact Assessment Case Study Short Selling Impact Assessment Case Study Short Selling Objectives of this case study This case study takes the form of a role play exercise. The objectives of this case study
DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION OCTOBER 7, 2014
DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION OCTOBER 7, 2014 Information Note 1: Environmental and Social Risk Classification The Board has requested the release of this document for consultation purposes to seek feedback on
SYSTEMIC RISK AND THE INSURANCE SECTOR
25 October 2009 SYSTEMIC RISK AND THE INSURANCE SECTOR Executive Summary 1. The purpose of this note is to identify challenges which insurance regulators face, by providing further input to the FSB on
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL Created by the NAIC Group Solvency Issues Working Group Of the Solvency Modernization Initiatives (EX) Task Force 2011 National Association
Lucas Papademos: Financial stability and macro-prudential supervision: objectives, instruments and the role of the ECB
Lucas Papademos: Financial stability and macro-prudential supervision: objectives, instruments and the role of the ECB Speech by Mr Lucas Papademos, Vice-President of the European Central Bank, at the
More on Taxing Risk. Narayana Kocherlakota President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
More on Taxing Risk Narayana Kocherlakota President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Pre-Conference Workshop Society for Economic Dynamics Annual Meeting Montréal, Québec, Canada July 7, 2010 1 Introduction
Response by Swedish authorities to the European Commission s public consultation on short selling
Ministry of Finance Financial Institutions and Markets Fi2010/3634 10-5913 Financial Stability Department 210-560-AFS European Commission Internal Markets and Services DG Financial Institutions markt-g3-consultations@ec.europa.eu
IMF PERFORMANCE PRELIMINARY DRAFT ISSUES PAPER INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OFFICE (IEO) IN THE RUN-UP TO THE CURRENT FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS
IMF PERFORMANCE IN THE RUN-UP TO THE CURRENT FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS PRELIMINARY DRAFT ISSUES PAPER FOR AN EVALUATION BY THE INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OFFICE (IEO) July 27, 2009 I. INTRODUCTION 1. The
SNS - Ricerca di base - Programma Manuela Moschella
SNS - Ricerca di base - Programma 2017 - Manuela Moschella Summary of the planned research activities My research activity for 2017 will focus on two main projects: the political-economic determinants
October 10, Teresa Rodriguez Arias International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO) Calle Oquendo Madrid
2001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006-1823 202.466.5460 202.296.3184 fax www.futuresindustry.org October 10, 2012 Teresa Rodriguez Arias International Organization of Securities Commission
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.4.2018 COM(2018) 172 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on Effects of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 and Directive 2013/36/EU on the Economic
2017 Capital Market Assumptions and Strategic Asset Allocations
2017 Capital Market Assumptions and Strategic Asset Allocations Tracie McMillion, CFA Head of Global Asset Allocation Chris Haverland, CFA Global Asset Allocation Strategist Stuart Freeman, CFA Co-Head
Regulatory Impact Assessment RBNZ Liquidity requirements for locally incorporated banks
Regulatory Impact Assessment RBNZ Liquidity requirements for locally incorporated banks Executive summary 1 A strong liquidity profile across banks is important for the maintenance of a sound and efficient
0470_022817_03_chap01.fm Page 11 Wednesday, September 8, :29 PM. Part I The basics of project risk management
0470_022817_03_chap01.fm Page 11 Wednesday, September 8, 2004 3:29 PM Part I The basics of project risk management 0470_022817_03_chap01.fm Page 12 Wednesday, September 8, 2004 3:29 PM 0470_022817_03_chap01.fm
GUERNSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION ISLE OF MAN FINANCIAL SUPERVISION COMMISSION JERSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION DISCUSSION PAPER ON:
GUERNSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION ISLE OF MAN FINANCIAL SUPERVISION COMMISSION JERSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION DISCUSSION PAPER ON: DOMESTIC SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT BANKS ( D-SIBS ) (INCLUDING
Why Are Some Banks Systemically Important? What Do We Do About It?
Why Are Some Banks Systemically Important? What Do We Do About It? Kevin Stiroh Federal Reserve Bank of New York May 26, 2010 for internal use only The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily
The rationale for the prudential regulation and supervision of insurers
216 Quarterly Bulletin 2013 Q3 The rationale for the prudential regulation and supervision of insurers By Simon Debbage of the Bank s Financial Stability Directorate and Stephen Dickinson of the Prudential
Enhancing Risk Management under Basel II
At the Risk USA 2005 Congress, Boston, Massachusetts June 8, 2005 Enhancing Risk Management under Basel II Thank you very much for the invitation to speak today. I am particularly honored to be among so
Mitigating and Financing Catastrophic Risks: Principles and Action Framework
Mitigating and Financing Catastrophic Risks: Principles and Action Framework This paper was prepared by Paul Kleindorfer, Howard Kunreuther, Erwann Michel-Kerjan and Richard Zeckhauser 1, members of the
Fostering Financial Stability. Remarks by. Ben S. Bernanke. Chairman. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. at the
For release on delivery 7:15 p.m. EDT April 9, 2012 Fostering Financial Stability Remarks by Ben S. Bernanke Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at the 2012 Financial Markets Conference
Technical advice on delegated acts on the deferral of extraordinary ex-post contributions to financial arrangements
EBA/Op/2015/06 6 March 2015 Technical advice on delegated acts on the deferral of extraordinary ex-post contributions to financial arrangements 1. Legal references - Article 104(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU
Page 1 of 5. 1 Interconnectedness, the second primary factor, refers to the degree of correlation among financial firms and
Systemic Risk and the U.S. Insurance Sector J. David Cummins and Mary A. Weiss The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 489-527 Synopsis By John Thomas Seigfreid This article investigates
Consultative report. Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems. Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions
Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions Consultative report Recovery of financial market infrastructures August 2013 This publication
Overview. Stanley Fischer
Overview Stanley Fischer The theme of this conference monetary policy and uncertainty was tackled head-on in Alan Greenspan s opening address yesterday, but after that it was more central in today s paper
Response to discussion paper of the Basel Committee on the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures
THE CENTRAL BANK OF HUNGARY Contact person: Ms Anikó Szombati Executive Director for Macroprudential Policy Email: szombatia@mnb.hu Phone: +36(1) 2600 2662 Response to discussion paper of the Basel Committee
Journal of the Banking Supervisor Promoting Best Practices for Banking Supervision
Special edition 2017 Journal of the Banking Supervisor Promoting Best Practices for Banking Supervision Dear subscriber, The Association of Supervisors of Banks of the Americas (ASBA) is pleased to present
Solvency Control Levels
International Association of Insurance Supervisors Solvency, Solvency Assessments and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee Draft Guidance Paper Solvency Control Levels Contents I. Introduction...1 II. Minimum
Systemic Risk & Insurance. 11 June 2013 Matthias Kubicek Legal Counsel
Systemic Risk & Insurance 11 June 2013 Matthias Kubicek Legal Counsel Agenda Evolution of Regulation & Supervision Regulatory landscape Systemic risk in insurance Timeframe & industry position Definition
A new regulatory landscape
A new regulatory landscape Remarks of Nout Wellink Chairman, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision President, De Nederlandsche Bank at the 16 th International Conference of Banking Supervisors Singapore,
Jürgen Stark: Financial stability the role of central banks. A new task? A new strategy? New tools?
Jürgen Stark: Financial stability the role of central banks. A new task? A new strategy? New tools? Speech by Mr Jürgen Stark, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, at the Frankfurt
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS ISSUES PAPER ON GROUP-WIDE SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND SUPERVISION 5 MARCH 2009 This document was prepared jointly by the Solvency and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.x INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES DRAFT, MARCH 2008 This document was prepared
APPENDIX E. Round 2: Comments on Application of Judgmental Methods
APPENDIX E Round 2: Comments on Application of Judgmental Methods Item 1: The historical period used to calibrate stochastic models Questions: Do you think that this Study provided potential developments
Guidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million. May Ce document est également disponible en français.
Guidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million May 2017 Ce document est également disponible en français. Applicability This Guidance Note is for use by all credit unions
Mohammed Laksaci: Banking sector reform and financial stability in Algeria
Mohammed Laksaci: Banking sector reform and financial stability in Algeria Communication by Mr Mohammed Laksaci, Governor of the Bank of Algeria, for the 38th meeting of the Board of Governors of Arab
January 3, Re: Comments Regarding CFTC s Proposed Rule Pertaining to the Process for Review of Swaps for Mandatory Clearing
Mr. David A. Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW Washington, DC 20581 Submitted via Agency Website January 3, 2011 Re: Comments Regarding
The Basel 2 Approach To Bank Operational Risk: Regulation On The Wrong Track * Richard J. Herring The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania
The Basel 2 Approach To Bank Operational Risk: Regulation On The Wrong Track * Richard J. Herring The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Over the past fifteen years, leading banks around the world
14 July Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities. Submitted online at
14 July 2014 Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities Submitted online at www.eba.europa.eu Re: JC/CP/2014/03 Consultation Paper on Risk Management Procedures for Non-Centrally Cleared OTC
Compensation and Risk Incentives in Banking and Finance Jian Cai, Kent Cherny, and Todd Milbourn
1 of 6 1/19/2011 8:41 PM Tools Subscribe to e-mail announcements Subscribe to Research RSS How to subscribe to RSS Twitter Search Fed publications Archives Economic Trends Economic Commentary Policy Discussion
IMF Reforms and Global Economic Stability. John B. Taylor 1
IMF Reforms and Global Economic Stability John B. Taylor 1 Testimony before the Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade Committee on Financial Services U.S. House of Representatives June 17, 2015 Chair
RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI
RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI GUIDELINES ON INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP) Bank Supervision Department March 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 MANDATE... 2 3.0 RATIONALE...
SAFER. United States Senate Washington, DC May 14, 2010
ECONOMISTS' COMMITTEE FOR STABLE, ACCOUNTABLE, FAIR AND EFFICIENT FINANCIAL REFORM United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 May 14, 2010 Letter from Joseph Stiglitz re. Section 716: Prohibition Against
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
Brussels, 21 March 2013 EACB draft position paper on EBA discussion paper on retail deposits subject to higher outflows for the purposes of liquidity reporting under the CRR The voice of 3.800 local and
Statement by Andrew Crockett Chairman of the Financial Stability Forum International Monetary and Financial Committee Meeting
Statement by Andrew Crockett Chairman of the Financial Stability Forum International Monetary and Financial Committee Meeting 20 April 2002 Washington, D.C. In its recent review of potential vulnerabilities
ESRB response to the EBA Consultation Paper on Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Large Exposures (CP 51)
26 March 2012 ESRB response to the EBA Consultation Paper on Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Large Exposures (CP 51) Introductory remarks The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) welcomes the
Bank bail-in and bail-out from a civil society and public interest perspective
Bank bail-in and bail-out from a civil society and public interest perspective Christian M. Stiefmüller Finance Watch The World Bank Financial Sector Assistance Center (FinSAC) Bank Resolution Conference
BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR
GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2 2. GUIDANCE ON STRESS TESTING AND SCENARIO ANALYSIS...3 3. RISK APPETITE...6 4. MANAGEMENT ACTION...6
CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli +44 (0) Hagit Keren +44 (0)
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting October 2018 Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Concerns and implementation challenges CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli rravelli@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6935 Hagit Keren hkeren@ifrs.org
On Systemically y Important Institutions and Progressive Systemic Mitigation
On Systemically y Important Institutions and Progressive Systemic Mitigation The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Conference on Regulating Systemic Risk Friday, October 30, 2009 Disclaimer The views expressed
Economic Brief. Basel III and the Continuing Evolution of Bank Capital Regulation
Economic Brief June 2011, EB11-06 Basel III and the Continuing Evolution of Bank Capital Regulation By Huberto M. Ennis and David A. Price Adopted in part as a response to the 2007 08 financial crisis,
Statement of. Ben S. Bernanke. Chairman. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. before the. Committee on Financial Services
For release on delivery 2:30 p.m. EDT September 24, 2008 Statement of Ben S. Bernanke Chairman Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System before the Committee on Financial Services U.S. House of
THE FUTURE FOR DEPOSIT INSURANCE. David G Mayes University of Auckland. Abstract
THE FUTURE FOR DEPOSIT INSURANCE David G Mayes University of Auckland Paper prepared for the 15 th Melbourne Money and Finance Conference 31 May 1 June 2010 Abstract This paper considers some major issues
REFORMING PCA. Addendum to Submitted Statements of. Mary Cunningham. and. William Raker. to the. National Credit Union Administration s
REFORMING PCA Addendum to Submitted Statements of Mary Cunningham and William Raker to the National Credit Union Administration s Summit on Credit Union Capital Representing the Credit Union National Association
LIBRARY. CP New York Financial Writers JUN T k 2r- JÒlÌoojlW, Remarks by. L. William Seidman Chairman Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
LIBRARY JUN26 1989 T k 2r- JÒlÌoojlW, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Remarks by. %m L. William Seidman Chairman Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Before CP New York Financial Writers New York,
Guidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion.
Guidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion January 2018 Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Applicability This
Supervisory Frameworks and Monetary Policy. Esther L. George President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Supervisory Frameworks and Monetary Policy Esther L. George President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Hoover Institution/Stanford University Conference on Frameworks for
Risk Management [A Helicopter View]
Risk Management [A Helicopter View] s Types of risk Risk Management Process What is risk management? For any activity, there are costs associated with any reward. Two costs are expected and unexpected
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT IN COMMERCIAL BANKS
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT IN COMMERCIAL BANKS Stelian PÂNZARU * Abstract: The current state of development of financial markets and financial system, and environmental developments in which they operate have