ADVICE LETTER (AL) SUSPENSION NOTICE ENERGY DIVISION

Transcription

1 ADVICE LETTER (AL) SUSPENSION NOTICE ENERGY DIVISION Utility Name: SCE Utility Number/Type: U 338-E Advice Letter Number(s): 3660-E Date AL(s) Filed: September 25, 2017 Utility Contact Person: Darrah Morgan Utility Phone No.: Date Utility Notified: October 25, 2017 [x] ed to: Darrah.Morgan@sce.com ED Staff Contact: Poonum Agrawal ED Staff poonum.agrawal@cpuc.ca.gov ED Staff Phone No.: [X] INITIAL SUSPENSION (up to 120 DAYS from the expiration of the initial review period) This is to notify that the above-indicated AL is suspended for up to 120 days beginning October 25, 2017 for the following reason(s) below. If the AL requires a Commission resolution and the Commission s deliberation on the resolution prepared by Energy Division extends beyond the expiration of the initial suspension period, the advice letter will be automatically suspended for up to 180 days beyond the initial suspension period. [ ] A Commission Resolution is Required to Dispose of the Advice Letter [ ] Advice Letter Requests a Commission Order [X] Advice Letter Requires Staff Review The expected duration of initial suspension period is 120 days [ ] FURTHER SUSPENSION (up to 180 DAYS beyond initial suspension period) The AL requires a Commission resolution and the Commission s deliberation on the resolution prepared by Energy Division has extended beyond the expiration of the initial suspension period. The advice letter is suspended for up to 180 days beyond the initial suspension period. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Poonum Agrawal at Poonum.agrawal@cpuc.ca.gov. cc: EDTariffUnit * Note: reference Decision D , dated February 21, 2002, and Rule 7.5 in appendix A of D.O

2 Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations September 22, 2017 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Modifications to Southern California Edison Company s Renewable Energy Market Adjusting Tariff Program Pursuant to Decision In compliance with Decision (D.) and Assembly Bill (AB) 1979, codified in Section of the California Public Utilities (PU) Code, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) hereby submits for filing the following changes to its tariffs. The revised tariff sheets are listed on Attachment A and are attached hereto. PURPOSE This filing proposes revisions to SCE s Schedule Re-MAT, Renewable Energy Market Adjusting Tariff, and Form Renewable Energy Market Adjusting Tariff Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), to implement the requirements of D and AB 1979, codified in Section of the PU Code. Pursuant to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC or Commission) in D , the proposed modifications add an exception to the 3 megawatt (MW) effective capacity limitation for SCE s Re-MAT Program providing that a conduit hydroelectric facility located in SCE s service territory with a Nameplate Capacity 1 that is less than or equal to four (4) MW, may be eligible for the Re-MAT tariff provided: (i) the facility was operational as of January 1, 1990; (ii) the facility complies with the Electric Rule 21 Tariff or Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Interconnection Agreement; (iii) the facility delivers no more than 3 MW to the grid at any time, and (iv) Limiting Equipment is installed at the Facility (which SCE defines in the attached tariff sheets and PPA as equipment, software, or other device that limits the ability of the Facility to deliver more than three (3) MW of electric energy to the point of interconnection to the CAISO grid). The proposed modifications to the PPA include the 1 D at 65 and D at 3, fn.6 clarify that the effective capacity limit for ReMAT is the nameplate capacity of the facility. P.O. Box Rush Street Rosemead, California (626) Fax (626)

3 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 pricing provision in AB 1979 providing that no payment is made under the Re-MAT PPA for energy delivered to the grid in excess of 3 MW. BACKGROUND Decisions , , and implemented the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (Re-MAT) to comply with the investor owned utilities (IOUs ) 2 portion of the 750 MW state-wide feed-in tariff program in PU Code Section , as modified by Senate Bills (SB) 380, 32 and 2 (1x). In these Decisions, the Commission allocated SCE two hundred twenty six (226) MW of feed-in tariff capacity to procure Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS)-eligible generation from new or existing renewable generation facilities with an effective capacity of no more than three (3) MW. 3 SCE s Schedule Re-MAT tariff, PPA, and associated forms were established via the Commission s approval of SCE s Advice 2916-E with an effective date of July 23, Re-MAT launched on October 1, 2013 and the first bi-monthly Program Period began on November 1, The Re-MAT program replaced SCE s AB 1969 feed-in tariff programs, which the Commission implemented in D to apply to RPS-eligible renewable energy generation facilities in SCE s territory with a generation capacity of up to one and a half (1.5) MW. Pursuant to SB 32 and in implementing Re-MAT, D increased the maximum size limit for facilities that are eligible for the feed-in tariff to three (3) MW. AB 1979 (Bigelow, 2016) was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 26, AB 1979 revises the eligibility criteria for Re-MAT to allow conduit hydroelectric facilities with an effective capacity of up to four (4) MW that were operational as of January 1, 1990 to participate in Re-MAT, if the facility delivers no more than three megawatts to the grid at any time. 4 AB 1979 further specifies that an eligible conduit hydroelectric facility with an effective capacity larger than three (3) MW must not receive payment from the IOU for any electricity delivered to the grid in excess of 3 MW at any time. 5 AB 1979 is codified in Section of the PU Code. On August 24, 2017 the Commission adopted D , which directs the IOUs to modify the Re-MAT tariff and standard PPA to allow a conduit hydroelectric facility with a Nameplate Capacity of up to 4 MW that meets the conditions in AB 1979 to be eligible for the Re-MAT tariff. D also directs the IOUs to modify the pricing term of the Re-MAT PPA to add the AB 1979 provision that no payment be made under the 2 The IOUs include SCE, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E). 3 SCE s Re-MAT program capacity is allocated into three Product Types, each with an independent pricing queue: Peaking As-Available, Non-Peaking As-Available, and Baseload, as directed by the Commission in D PU Code Section Ibid.

4 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 Re-MAT PPA for energy delivered in excess of 3 MW at any time. D further requires that both the Re-MAT tariff and PPA include the condition that the seller is responsible for limiting deliveries to the grid to no more than 3 MW. 6 D directs the IOUs file a Tier 2 Advice Letter to implement the changes within 30 days of the effective date of the Decision. 7 D also includes a footnote as follows: Since conduit hydropower facilities eligible under AB 1979 may have an effective capacity up to 4 MW, electricity generated in excess of the ReMAT program s limits may be sold pursuant to other CPUC programs, consistent with all state and federal requirements, if the generating facility so chooses. We thus give full effect to both AB 1979 s 3 MW limit on purchases under the Section FiT program and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), on which the Section FiT program is premised, including the utilities mandatory purchase obligation under PURPA. See generally D , as modified by D , at 11, and 16 U.S.C. 824a-3(a). 8 While SCE has included this directive as a special condition in its Re-MAT tariff, we have not modified the Re-MAT PPA to reflect this directive because (i) we have not identified any CPUC PURPA program in which these conduit hydropower facilities are eligible to sell power in excess of Re-MAT s program limits; 9 and (ii) SCE may seek rehearing of the directive because it is inconsistent with AB 1979, which expressly requires that to be eligible to participate in Re-MAT, these facilities cannot deliver more than 3 MW to the grid at any time. Accordingly, the directive is included in the tariff under protest. 6 D at 4. 7 D at Ordering Paragraph (OP) 1. 8 Id. at 5, fn None of the existing CPUC PURPA programs allow sales to be made to multiple programs. For example, Net Energy Metering (NEM) resources must be sized primarily to offset part or all of the customer s own electrical requirements, and SCE s NEM Tariff requires any excess energy be sold to the interconnected utility under the tariff. Thus, an entity would not be able to abide by the NEM Tariff and sell under Re-MAT. Additionally, D and Section D.10 of Schedule Re-MAT each require NEM customers to first terminate participation in NEM in order to participate in the Feed-in Tariffs (see D at 101 and Finding of Fact 50 at 122). As another example, each of SCE s CPUC PURPA contracts requires that all net energy from the facility under contract be sold to the SCE in accordance with the terms and conditions of the particular SCE CPUC PURPA contract (e.g., Section 3.01(a) of SCE s Standard Contract for Qualifying Facilities Under 20 MW). Therefore, an entity would not be able to abide by any of SCE s CPUC PURPA contracts and also sell to SCE concurrently under ReMAT.

5 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 PROPOSED TARIFF CHANGES Pursuant to D , SCE proposes the following changes to its Schedule Re-MAT and Form PPA. Schedule Re-MAT, Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff Eligibility Criteria (Section D) o A new Section D.5 titled Namelate Capacity is added, which allows an AB 1979 Facility to have a Nameplate Capacity that is less than or equal to four (4) MW. Additionally, subsequent sections were renumbered. o A new Section D.6.c is added, requiring that for AB 1979 Facilities, the Project s most recent Interconnection Study or Interconnection Agreement must include a description of the Limiting Equipment required to be installed at the Facility, where Limiting Equipment is a newly defined term that means equipment, software, or other device that limits the ability of the Facility to deliver more than three (3) MW of electric energy to the Delivery Point. Re-MAT PPA (Section J) o A new Section J.12 is added to include a requirement that the Nameplate Capacity must be provided in an Applicant s Program Participation Request (PPR) for AB 1979 Facilities only. Special Conditions (Section L) o A new Section L.4 titled Other CPUC Programs is added to provide that an AB 1979 Facility may sell electricity generated in excess of the ReMAT program s limits pursuant to other CPUC programs, consistent with all state and federal requirements. 10 Definitions (Section N) o AB 1979 Facility is added as a new definition, which means a conduit hydroelectric facility that was operational on or before January 1, 1990, and on or before January 1, 1990 the facility had a nameplate capacity equal to the Applicant s Nameplate Capacity. o The definition of As-Available Non-Peaking is updated to include AB 1979 Facilities, and to clarify that wind and all other hydroelectric facilities are also As-Available Non-Peaking pursuant to D Similarly, the definitions of As-Available Peaking and Baseload are updated to clarify that AB 1979 Facilities are not eligible, and to clarify which technologies are eligible. 10 See D , p. 5, fn.8. As explained in this advice letter, SCE includes this new Section L.4 in Schedule Re-MAT under protest, because it is inconsistent with AB 1979, which expressly requires that to be eligible to participate in Re-MAT, these facilities cannot deliver more than 3 MW to the grid at any time. See PU Code Section (a)(2). Accordingly, SCE may seek rehearing of the directive.

6 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 o A new Section N.6 is added to clarify that the term Limiting Equipment shall have the same meaning as the definition in Appendix A of the Re- MAT PPA. Contract Capacity References (throughout) o The term capacity is changed to Contract Capacity in Sections D.8, E.1.a, G.5, I.5, and N.5, to clarify that the usage refers to Contract Capacity rather than Nameplate Capacity. Form , Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff Power Purchase Agreement The term Nameplate Capacity is added to: (i) the list of Documents Included, (ii) Section 3.1, and (iii) the definitions, allowing a Nameplate Capacity that is less than or equal to four (4) MW. The conditions precedent required to achieve the Commercial Operation Date, as set forth in Section 3.5, are updated to add: (i) a condition that the Demonstrated Nameplate Capacity has been determined in accordance with Appendix M (new Section ); and (ii) a condition that Seller has installed Limiting Equipment at the Facility, where Limiting Equipment is a newly defined term that means equipment, software, or other device that limits the ability of the Facility to deliver more than three (3) MW of electric energy to the Delivery Point (new Section and the definitions). These additional conditions apply to Facilities with a Nameplate Capacity greater than 3 MW that are eligible pursuant to AB The Contract Price in Section is modified to reduce the Contract Price to Zero dollars ($0.00) per kwh for any Delivered Energy that exceeds the Payment Limit, where Payment Limit is a newly defined term that means the lesser of (i) one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Contract Capacity and (ii) three (3) MW. The following new representations, warranties, and covenants are added to Section 5.3, which apply to Facilities with a Nameplate Capacity greater than 3 MW that are eligble pursuant to AB 1979: (i) Seller covenants that their interconnection agreement will include a description of the Limiting Equipment required to be installed at the Facility (new Section ); (ii) Seller represents that the Facility was operational and generating electric energy as of January 1, 1990 (new Section ); (iii) Seller covenants that during the Delivery Term, Seller will not deliver more than three (3) MW of electric energy to the Delivery Point (new Section ); and (iv) Seller covenants that during the Delivery Term, Seller shall have installed Limiting Equipment at the Facility (new Section ). Two new Events of Default are added to Section , providing that an Event of Default shall occur if (i) Seller fails to install Limiting Equipment at the Facility or removes any Limiting Equipment from the Facility (new Section ); or (ii) the Facility s Demonstrated Nameplate Capacity is greater than the Nameplate Capacity (new Section ). These new Events of Default are applicable to Facilities with a Nameplate Capacity greater than three (3) MW that are eligible pursuant to AB 1979.

7 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 The Milestone Schedule in Appendix I is modified to add the date that the Nameplate Capacity will be demonstrated. The procedure for demonstrating the Contract Capacity in Appendix M is updated to add a procedure for demonstrating the Nameplate Capacity, and a new definition of Demonstrated Nameplate Capacity is added. Corrections are made throughout to conform the comments, to correct the definition of Settlement Interval, to clarify the expected Commercial Operation Date in Section 2.8.1, and to correctly remove references to Full Capacity Deliverability Status payment allocation factors in LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Clean, Fully Revised Copy of Schedule ReMAT and Form Attachment B: Redline of Schedule ReMAT Attachment C: Redline of Form No cost information is required for this advice filing. This advice filing will not increase any rate or charge, cause the withdrawal of service, or conflict with any other schedule or rule. TIER DESIGNATION Pursuant to General Order (GO) 96-B, Energy Industry Rule 5.2 and OP 1 of D , this advice letter is submitted with a Tier 2 designation. EFFECTIVE DATE This advice filing will become effective on October 22, 2017, the 30 th calendar day after the date filed. NOTICE Anyone wishing to protest this advice filing may do so by letter via U.S. Mail, facsimile, or electronically, any of which must be received no later than 20 days after the date of this advice filing. Protests should be submitted to: CPUC, Energy Division Attention: Tariff Unit 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California EDTariffUnit@cpuc.ca.gov Copies should also be mailed to the attention of the Director, Energy Division, Room 4004 (same address above).

8 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 In addition, protests and all other correspondence regarding this advice letter should also be sent by letter and transmitted via facsimile or electronically to the attention of: Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company 8631 Rush Street Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) AdviceTariffManager@sce.com Laura Genao Managing Director, State Regulatory Affairs c/o Karyn Gansecki Southern California Edison Company 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2030 San Francisco, California Facsimile: (415) Karyn.Gansecki@sce.com There are no restrictions on who may file a protest, but the protest shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which it is based and must be received by the deadline shown above. In accordance with General Rule 4 of GO 96-B, SCE is serving copies of this advice filing to the interested parties shown on the attached GO 96-B, R and R service lists. Address change requests to the GO 96-B service list should be directed by electronic mail to AdviceTariffManager@sce.com or at (626) For changes to all other service lists, please contact the Commission s Process Office at (415) or by electronic mail at Process_Office@cpuc.ca.gov. Further, in accordance with PU Code Section 491, notice to the public is hereby given by filing and keeping the advice filing at SCE s corporate headquarters. To view other SCE advice letters filed with the Commission, log on to SCE s web site at

9 ADVICE 3660-E (U 338-E) September 22, 2017 For questions, please contact Steven Coulter at (626) or by electronic mail at Steven.W.Coulter@sce.com. Southern California Edison Company RGW:sc:jm Enclosures /// ///s/ Russell G. Worden Russell G. Worden

10 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ADVICE LETTER FILING SUMMARY ENERGY UTILITY MUST BE COMPLETED BY UTILITY (Attach additional pages as needed) Company name/cpuc Utility No.: Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) Utility type: Contact Person: Darrah Morgan ELC GAS Phone #: (626) PLC HEAT WATER Disposition Notice to: EXPLANATION OF UTILITY TYPE ELC = Electric GAS = Gas PLC = Pipeline HEAT = Heat WATER = Water (Date Filed/ Received Stamp by CPUC) Advice Letter (AL) #: 3660-E Tier Designation: 2 Subject of AL: Modifications to Southern California Edison Company's Renewable Energy Market Adjusting Tariff Program Pursuant to Decision Keywords (choose from CPUC listing): Compliance AL filing type: Monthly Quarterly Annual One-Time Other If AL filed in compliance with a Commission order, indicate relevant Decision/Resolution #: Decision Does AL replace a withdrawn or rejected AL? If so, identify the prior AL: Summarize differences between the AL and the prior withdrawn or rejected AL: Confidential treatment requested? Yes No If yes, specification of confidential information: Confidential information will be made available to appropriate parties who execute a nondisclosure agreement. Name and contact information to request nondisclosure agreement/access to confidential information: Resolution Required? Yes No Requested effective date: 10/22/17 No. of tariff sheets: 97 Estimated system annual revenue effect: (%): Estimated system average rate effect (%): When rates are affected by AL, include attachment in AL showing average rate effects on customer classes (residential, small commercial, large C/I, agricultural, lighting). Tariff schedules affected: Schedule Re-MAT and Form Service affected and changes proposed 1 : Pending advice letters that revise the same tariff sheets: N/A 1 Discuss in AL if more space is needed.

11 Protests and all other correspondence regarding this AL are due no later 20 days after the date of this filing, unless otherwise authorized by the Commission, and shall be sent to: CPUC, Energy Division Attention: Tariff Unit 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company 8631 Rush Street Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Laura Genao Managing Director, State Regulatory Affairs c/o Karyn Gansecki Southern California Edison Company 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2030 San Francisco, California Facsimile: (415)

12 Public Utilities Commission 3660-E Attachment A Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No. Title of Sheet Cancelling Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No. Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Original E Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Original E Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Revised E Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Original E* Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Original E Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Revised E Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Revised E Revised E Schedule Re-MAT Revised E Revised E Form Revised E Revised E Table of Contents Revised E Revised E Table of Contents Revised E Revised E Table of Contents Revised E 1

13 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 1 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF A. APPLICABILITY The Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff schedule (Re-MAT or this Schedule) implements the renewable resource feed-in tariff program pursuant to California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section and California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision (D.) , D , and D The Schedule is available, on a first-come, first-served basis, to applicants that own or control a Facility (or Project), meet the eligibility criteria below, and submit a complete Program Participation Request (PPR). The maximum combined contract capacities of participating Facilities under SCE s Re-MAT, SCE s California Renewable Energy Small Tariff (CREST) schedule, and SCE s Water Agency Tariff for Eligible Renewables (WATER) schedule is 226 megawatts (MW) (Program Cap), which represents SCE s allocated share of the total statewide program cap of 750 MW, as provided for in PUC Section and CPUC D B. EFFECTIVE DATE The Effective Date of Re-MAT is July 24, 2013, as determined in CPUC D C. TERRITORY SCE s electric service territory. D. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA An applicant for Re-MAT (Applicant) must own or control the Project and the Applicant s proposed Project must meet the following eligibility criteria for Re-MAT (Eligibility Criteria): 1. Territory: The Project must be physically located within SCE s electric service territory and must be interconnected to SCE s electric distribution system. 2. Eligible Renewable Energy Resource: The Project must be an Eligible Renewable Energy Resource as defined in PUC Section Qualifying Facility: The Project must be a Qualifying Facility, as defined by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. See 16 U.S.C. 824a-3(b); 18 C.F.R (a)(2). 4. Contract Capacity: The Contract Capacity for the Project cannot exceed three (3.0) MW. 5. Nameplate Capacity (for AB 1979 Facilities only): If the Project is an AB 1979 Facility, the Project may have a Nameplate Capacity that is less than or equal to four (4.0) MW. (T) (N) (N) (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 1P10 Resolution

14 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 2 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF D. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (Continued) (Continued) 6. Interconnection Study/Strategically Located: An Applicant must have passed the Fast Track screens, passed Supplemental Review, completed a SCE System Impact Study in the Independent Study Process, or completed a SCE Phase 1 Study in the Cluster Study Process for its Project (Interconnection Study). a. The Project must be interconnected to SCE s distribution system, and the Project s most recent Interconnection Study or Interconnection Agreement must affirmatively support the Project s ability to interconnect (a) within twenty four (24) months of the execution of the Re-MAT power purchase agreement (PPA) (Form ) and (b) without requiring transmission system Network Upgrades in excess of $300,000. b. If both SCE s Rule 21 and SCE s Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) are applicable and available to a Project in a given situation, the Project can choose to pursue interconnection under either SCE s Rule 21 or SCE s WDAT, until the CPUC makes a determination otherwise. After such a CPUC decision, Projects must interconnect as stipulated in that CPUC determination, except that those Projects that request interconnection pursuant to SCE s Rule 21 or SCE s WDAT and have submitted a completed PPR under this Schedule prior to any final CPUC determination will not be required to switch interconnection tariffs and will continue to be eligible to receive service under this Schedule, provided the Project is otherwise eligible. c. If the Project is an AB 1979 Facility, the Project s most recent Interconnection Study or Interconnection Agreement must include a description of the Limiting Equipment required to be installed at the Facility. 7. Site Control: The Applicant must provide to SCE an attestation that it has 100% site control for the Project through: (a) direct ownership; (b) lease; or (c) an option to lease or purchase that may be exercised upon execution of the Re-MAT PPA. The Applicant is required to submit a map showing the boundary of the Site for which the Applicant has control as part of the PPR. SCE reserves the right to request additional information. 8. Developer Experience: The Applicant must provide to SCE an attestation that at least one member of its development team has: (a) completed the development of at least one project of similar technology and capacity; or (b) begun construction of at least one other project of similar technology and capacity. A project less than one (1) MW will be deemed to be a similar capacity to a Project with a Contract Capacity of up to one (1) MW. A project between one (1) MW to three (3) MW will be deemed to be a similar capacity to a Project with a Contract Capacity of up to three (3) MW. For example, for a Project with a Contract Capacity of three (3) MW, a project of similar capacity cannot be smaller than one (1) MW. (N) I (N) (T) (T) (T) I I I (T) (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 2P8 Resolution

15 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 3 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF D. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (Continued) (Continued) 9. Daisy Chaining: The Applicant must provide to SCE an attestation that the Project is the only exporting project being developed or owned or controlled by the Applicant on any single or contiguous pieces of property. SCE may, at its sole discretion, determine that the Applicant does not satisfy this Eligibility Criteria if the Project appears to be part of a larger installation in the same general location that has been or is being developed by the Applicant or the Applicant s Affiliates. 10. Other Incentives: A Project that previously received incentives under the California Solar Initiative (CSI) or the Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) is ineligible for Re-MAT if the incentives were received within ten (10) years or less of the date that Applicant submits a PPR for Re-MAT for such Project. An Applicant for a Project that previously received incentive payments under CSI or SGIP must provide an attestation to SCE stating that, as of the date the Applicant submits the PPR: (a) the Project has been operating for at least ten (10) years from the date the Applicant first received ratepayer-funded incentive payments under CSI or SGIP for the Project; and (b) to the extent the CPUC requires reimbursement of any ratepayer-funded incentive, the Applicant can demonstrate the Project s owner has provided the applicable administrator with any required refunds of incentives. 11. Net Energy Metering: An Applicant that is a net energy metering (NEM) customer can only participate in Re-MAT if the Applicant terminates its participation in the NEM program for the Project prior to the Re-MAT PPA s Execution Date. 12. Eligibility Criteria Non-Compliance: An Applicant may not submit a PPR if, within the previous six (6) months, the Applicant, the Project, or an Affiliated Company has had: (i) a Re-MAT PPR rejected pursuant to Section E.1.h of this Schedule; or (ii) a Bioenergy Market Adjusting Tariff (BioMAT) program participation request rejected pursuant to section E.2.i of the schedule BioMAT. (T) (T) (T) (T) E. PROGRAM PARTICIPATION REQUEST The PPR requirements and review process are described below. 1. An Applicant must submit a complete PPR to be eligible for Re-MAT and must submit the following PPR items. Information on how to submit the PPR will be available on SCE s website. A PPR must include: a. PPR Fee: Applicant must pay a $2 per kilowatt (kw) of Contract Capacity nonrefundable application fee as part of each PPR submission. The PPR fee will not be applicable towards the Collateral Requirement under a Re-MAT PPA. The manner and form of payment will be specified by SCE on its website or information technology system. (T) b. PPR Form: Applicant must submit the PPR form in a manner and form specified by SCE. (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 3P8 Resolution

16 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E* Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 7 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF G. CAPACITY ALLOCATION (Continued) (Continued) 4. If a CREST PPA is terminated prior to delivery of any electricity to SCE, then any capacity associated with such CREST PPA will be equally allocated among the Product Types. Any terminated CREST PPAs approved in Resolution E-4593 will not be re-allocated. If a WATER PPA is terminated prior to delivery of any electricity to SCE, then any capacity associated with such WATER PPA will be equally allocated among the Product Types. Any capacity associated with CREST or WATER PPAs that are terminated after delivering any electricity to SCE will not be re-allocated. 5. If a Re-MAT PPA is terminated prior to delivery of any electricity to SCE, then any Contract Capacity associated with such Re-MAT PPA will be allocated to the Product Type corresponding to the technology of the terminated Re-MAT PPA. Any Contract Capacity associated with Re- MAT PPAs that are terminated after delivering any electricity to SCE will not be re-allocated. (T) I (T) H. PRICE The prices for Re-MAT PPAs will be determined as follows: 1. The initial Re-MAT Contract Price offered for each Product Type in Period 1 will equal $89.23/MWh, pre- time-of-delivery adjustments. See the Re-MAT PPA for contractual terms related to Contract Price. 2. The Contract Price for each Product Type will be published on SCE s website on the first business day of every Period. After Period 1, the Contract Price for each Product Type will adjust independently for each Period as follows: a. A Contract Price adjustment will be triggered in a subsequent Period only if at the beginning of the prior Period there are at least five (5) eligible Projects from five (5) different Applicants (including Applicant s Affiliates) with Re-MAT Queue Numbers for the applicable Product Type. If an Applicant or its Affiliates have any ownership interest (based on the information provided by and attested to by Applicant as described in Program Participation Request, Section E.1.c.3) in a Project, the Project will be attributed to the Applicant(s) for purposes of this provision. If there are fewer than (5) eligible Projects from five (5) different Applicants in the queue for any Product Type at the beginning of any Period, then the Contract Price for that Product Type will remain the same in the next Period. If at least five (5) eligible Projects from five (5) different Applicants are in the queue for a Product Type, the Contract Price for that Product Type may increase or decrease in the next Period based on the criteria described below in Price, Sections H.2.b. and H.2.d. (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 7P8 Resolution

17 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 10 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF I. SUBSCRIPTION (Continued) (Continued) 4. Applicants who Reject the Contract Price or Accept the Contract Price but are not awarded a Re-MAT PPA will retain their Re-MAT Queue Number, except as otherwise specified in this Schedule. 5. Applicants that are awarded a Re-MAT PPA for a Period must submit an executed Re-MAT PPA to SCE within ten (10) business days of receiving written notice of the Re-MAT PPA award from SCE. If the Applicant fails to return an executed Re-MAT PPA to SCE within ten (10) business days of SCE s written notice, the Applicant will be deemed to have rejected the Re-MAT PPA and the Applicant s Re-MAT Queue Number will be revoked. The Contract Capacity associated with the Applicant s Project will be allocated per Capacity Allocation, Section G.5 of this Schedule. (T) 6. The Project may not have an existing PPA or other contract for energy and/or capacity deliveries to SCE, or to any other counterparty, from the same Project at the time of execution of the Re- MAT PPA or, if allowed per the terms of the existing contract, the Seller must provide documentation demonstrating that the existing contract will be terminated on a date certain that is within the Commercial Operation Date (COD) timing allowed in the Re-MAT PPA prior to the execution of the Re-MAT PPA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Seller is seeking an excess sales Re-MAT PPA for the Project, Seller is not required to terminate or demonstrate future termination of any applicable contractual arrangements with respect to serving any Site Host Load. 7. Within ten (10) business days of the execution of the Re-MAT PPA by both the Applicant and SCE, SCE shall provide on its website information regarding the executed Re-MAT PPA as required by the CPUC in D J. RE-MAT PPA The Re-MAT PPA will be completed by SCE for execution by the Applicant and shall include the information submitted in the PPR, which includes, but is not limited to, the information listed below. 1. Seller Name: Must be a legal entity 2. Project Name 3. Facility street address (or nearest intersection) (or coordinates if no intersection or street address) 4. Type of Facility: Baseload or As-Available 5. Renewable Resource Type: Solar PV, Biogas, etc. 6. Interconnection Queue Position (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 10P9 Resolution

18 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 11 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF J. RE-MAT PPA (Continued) (Continued) 7. Interconnection Point 8. Service Voltage 9. Delivery Point 10. Expected Commercial Operation Date: No later than twenty-four (24) months from execution date of the Re-MAT PPA 11. Contract Capacity 12. Nameplate Capacity (for AB 1979 Facilities only) 13. Delivery Term: 10, 15, or 20 years 14. Transaction: Full Buy/Sell or Excess Sale 15. Contract Quantity: Provide estimates in kwh/year, net of Station Use and Site Host Load for each year of the Delivery Term (N) (T) (T) (T) K. METERING Projects must be electrically independent and separately metered. Metering requirements are described in the Re-MAT PPA. L. SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following special conditions apply to Re-MAT and the Re-MAT program: 1. COD Extension Policy: The COD for the Re-MAT PPA may only be extended pursuant to the terms in the Re-MAT PPA. The Re-MAT PPA requires that the Project achieve its COD within twenty-four (24) months after the Execution Date of the Re-MAT PPA, with the possibility of one six (6) month extension for Permitted Extensions as set forth in the Re-MAT PPA. 2. Termination of Service: Unless terminated earlier pursuant to the Re-MAT PPA, the Re-MAT PPA automatically terminates immediately following the last day of the Delivery Term. 3. Re-MAT Suspension: SCE may file a motion with the CPUC to suspend Re-MAT when evidence of market manipulation or malfunction exists. The motion must be filed on the applicable CPUC service list. The motion shall identify the portion of the program suspended, the specific behavior and reasons for the suspension, and SCE s proposal for resolving the problem. Any requested suspension will be implemented by SCE immediately upon filing and shall not be modified or changed unless directed by the CPUC. 4. Other CPUC Programs (for AB 1979 Facilities only): If the Project is an AB 1979 Facility, electricity generated in excess of the ReMAT program s limits may be sold pursuant to other CPUC programs, consistent with all state and federal requirements. (N) (N) (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 11P11 Resolution

19 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 12 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF M. DENIAL OF RE-MAT SERVICE (Continued) SCE may deny a request for service, upon written notice, under this Schedule if it makes any of the following findings: 1. The Project does not meet the requirements of PUC Section or any applicable CPUC decision. 2. The transmission or distribution grid that would serve as the point of interconnection is inadequate. 3. The Project does not meet all applicable state and local laws and building standards, and utility interconnection requirements. 4. The aggregate of all electric generation facilities on a distribution circuit would adversely impact utility operation and load restoration efforts of the distribution system. 5. The Project appears to be part of a larger overall installation by the same company or consortium in the same general location. 6. There exist any outstanding obligations owed to SCE by the Applicant under a previously executed Re-MAT PPA or other agreement related to the sale of energy, capacity, green attributes, or other related products, in each case, that relates to either any portion of the site or the interconnection queue position to be utilized by the Project seeking service. 7. The Applicant does not otherwise meet the requirements of this Schedule. Upon receipt of a notice of denial from SCE, the Applicant may appeal the decision to the CPUC. N. DEFINITIONS Capitalized terms in this Schedule shall have the same meaning as the defined term in the Re-MAT PPA (Form ), unless the term is otherwise defined in this Schedule. 1. AB 1979 Facility: For the purposes of this Schedule, an AB 1979 Facility is a conduit hydroelectric facility that was operational on or before January 1, 1990, and on or before January 1, 1990 the facility had a nameplate capacity equal to the Applicant s Nameplate Capacity. 2. Affiliated Company(ies): For the purpose of this Schedule, Affiliated Company(ies) shall mean: (i) any entity with a direct or indirect equity interest in the Applicant or the Project; (ii) any subsidiary of the Applicant; or (iii) any affiliate of the Applicant. (N) I I (N) (T) 3. As-Available Non-Peaking: For the purposes of this Schedule, As-Available Non-Peaking shall have the same meaning as the defined term As-Available Facility in Appendix A of the Re- MAT PPA and have a generation profile demonstrating intermittent energy delivery with less than 95% of the expected output generated between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (e.g. wind, hydroelectric, and AB 1979 Facilities). SCE reserves the right to request a generation profile and any supporting information for the Project to confirm the generation profile. (L) (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 12P11 Resolution

20 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule Re-MAT Sheet 13 (T) RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF N. DEFINITIONS (Continued) (Continued) 4. As-Available Peaking: For the purposes of this Schedule, As-Available Peaking shall have the same meaning as the defined term As-Available Facility in Appendix A of the Re-MAT PPA and have a generation profile demonstrating intermittent energy delivery with 95% or more of the expected output generated between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (e.g., solar). SCE reserves the right to request a generation profile and supporting information for the Project to confirm the generation profile. 5. Baseload: For the purposes of this Schedule, Baseload shall have the same meaning as the defined term Baseload Facility in Appendix A of the Re-MAT PPA (e.g. bioenergy and geothermal). 6. Limiting Equipment: For the purposes of this Schedule, Limiting Equipment shall have the same meaning as the defined term Limiting Equipment in Appendix A of the Re-MAT PPA. 7. Subscription: For the purposes of this Schedule, Subscription is defined as the total Contract Capacity of Applicants willing to accept the Contract Price in a Period. (L) (T) (L) (N) (N) (N) (N) (T) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 13P14 Resolution

21 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Sheet 1 RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT Form (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3660-E Caroline Choi Date Filed Sep 22, 2017 Decision Senior Vice President Effective 1P5 Resolution

22 Contract ID#[###], QFID#[###] [This contract has been approved by the California Public Utilities Commission in Decision Modification of the terms and conditions of this contract will result in the need to obtain additional Commission approval of the contract.] [The contract approved by Decision includes terms and conditions that may not be modified pursuant to prior Commission decisions, including Decision , Decision and Decision , as modified by Decision , and these terms and conditions are shown in shaded text.] RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND [Table of Contents to be added] Form /2017 i

23 Contract ID#[###], QFID#[###] RENEWABLE MARKET ADJUSTING TARIFF POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND Southern California Edison Company, a California corporation ( Buyer or SCE ), and ( Seller ), a [Seller s form of business entity and state of organization], hereby enter into this Power Purchase Agreement ( Agreement ) made and effective as of the Execution Date. Seller and Buyer are sometimes referred to in this Agreement jointly as Parties or individually as Party. In consideration of the mutual promises and obligations stated in this Agreement and its appendices, the Parties agree as follows: 1. DOCUMENTS INCLUDED This Agreement includes the following appendices, which are specifically incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I Appendix J Appendix K Appendix L Definitions Commercial Operation Date Confirmation Letter Time of Delivery Periods and Payment Allocation Factors Forecasting and Outage Notification Requirements Description of the Facility Telemetry Requirements Guaranteed Energy Production Damages Form of Letter of Credit Seller s Milestone Schedule Notices List Form of General Consent to Assignment Form of Financing Consent to Assignment Appendix M Procedure for Demonstration of Contract Capacity [and Demonstration of Nameplate Capacity] {Comment: for conduit hydroelectric Facilities that are eligible pursuant to Assembly Bill No } Form /2017

24 Contract ID#[###], QFID#[###] Appendix N-1 QF Efficiency Monitoring Program Cogeneration Data Reporting Form Appendix N-2 Fuel Use Standards Small Power Producer Data Reporting Form 2. SELLER S FACILITY AND COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE This Agreement governs Buyer s purchase of the Product from the electrical generating facility (hereinafter referred to as the Facility or Project ) as described in this Section. 2.1 Facility Location. The Facility is physically located at: 2.2 Facility Name. The Facility is named. 2.3 Type of Facility The Facility is a(n) (check one): Baseload Facility As-Available Facility The Facility s renewable resource is. [e.g., biogas, hydro, etc.] The Facility is a (check all applicable): small power production facility, as described in 18 CFR (a), (c) and topping-cycle cogeneration facility, as defined in 18 CFR (d) bottoming-cycle cogeneration facility, as defined in 18 CFR (e) 2.4 Interconnection Queue Position. The Project s interconnection queue position is. The Project s interconnection queue position may only be used for the sole benefit of the Project. 2.5 Interconnection Point. The Facility is connected to Buyer s electric system at [include description of physical interconnection point] at a service voltage of kv. Form /2017

25 Contract ID#[###], QFID#[###] 2.6 Delivery Point. The Delivery Point is at the point of interconnection with the CAISO Grid, [insert name or location]. 2.7 Facility Description. A description of the Facility, including a summary of its significant components, a drawing showing the general arrangements of the Facility, and a single line diagram illustrating the interconnection of the Facility and loads with Buyer s electric distribution system, is attached and incorporated herein as Appendix E. 2.8 Expected Commercial Operation Date; Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date The Facility s expected Commercial Operation Date is, which may, subject to the terms of the Agreement, be modified by Seller from time to time after the Execution Date. Seller shall provide Notice to Buyer of the latest expected Commercial Operation Date of the Facility no later than sixty (60) days before such date Seller shall have demonstrated Commercial Operation by the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date, which date shall be no later than the date that is twenty-four (24) months (720 days) after the Execution Date; provided that, subject to Section 2.8.4, the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date may be extended for the following reasons ( Permitted Extensions ): Subject to Section 2.8.5, if Seller has taken all commercially reasonable actions (including but not limited to Seller s timely filing of required documents and payment of all applicable fees) to obtain permits necessary for the construction and operation of the Project, but is unable to obtain such permits due to delays beyond Seller s reasonable control ( Permitting Delay ), then the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date shall be extended six (6) months; Subject to Section 2.8.5, if Seller has taken all commercially reasonable actions (including but not limited to Seller s timely filing of required documents and payment of all applicable fees, and completion of all Electric System Upgrades needed, if any) to have the Project physically interconnected to the Transmission/Distribution Owner s distribution system, but fails to secure any necessary commitments from CAISO or the Transmission/Distribution Owner for such interconnection and upgrades due to delays beyond Seller s reasonable control ( Transmission Delay ), then the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date shall be extended six (6) months; In the event of Force Majeure ( Force Majeure Delay ) without regard to Transmission Delay or Permitting Delay, the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date shall be extended on a day-to-day basis for a cumulative period of not more than six (6) months; provided that Seller complies with Section 11; or If Seller pays to Buyer damages in an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Collateral Requirement per day for each day (or portion thereof) the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date is extended ( Daily Delay Liquidated Damages ), then the Guaranteed Commercial Operation Date shall be extended on a day-to-day basis corresponding to the number of days for which Seller has paid Daily Delay Liquidated Damages Form /2017