Doc # SMS/M/01 CHAPTER 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 6.2 Safety Data Collection for Risk Management. 6.3 Hazard Identification & Risk managements
|
|
- Candice Hopkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 of Hazard Data Gathering Methods 6.1 Reactive and Proactive report 6.2 Safety Data Collection for Risk Management SAMS 6.3 Hazard Identification & Risk managements Hazard identification Risk Assessment Technique Risk Assessment ~ Tables 6.4 Risk Acceptability Matrix 6.5 Action Criteria 6.6 Risk Mitigation
2 Page 2 of HAZARD DATA GATHERING METHODS The risks and costs inherent in commercial aviation necessitate a rational process for decision-making. Implementation of risk management processes is critical to an effective safety management programme. Risks cannot always be eliminated; nor are all conceivable safety management measures economically feasible. Risk management facilitates this balancing act, beginning with hazard identification. The creation and operation of effective hazard identification programs is fundamental to effective safety management. An organization may draw from a broad menu of safety activities to identify hazards or safety issues warranting further action. The effective identification of hazards can be achieved by brainstorming, using an appropriate selection of management and staff; staff surveys and a review of pertinent accident/incident records from both internal and external sources. Hazard identification should be initially undertaken to provide a comprehensive assessment of the risks that face the Airline. Subsequently, hazard identification should be periodically reviewed. The process should also be repeated whenever there is a significant change to the organization, its staff, procedures or equipment. The line manager has the responsibility for setting in place measures to remove, or mitigate the risks of, the identified hazard. The Safety Committee will monitor the completion of this task. To be successful, the hazard identification process must take place within a non-punitive (or just) safety culture. The Management is primarily interested in learning of potential weaknesses in the system s safety that could lead to an accident or otherwise compromise the efficiency of the operation. Blame is only an issue when individuals are culpable of reckless or negligent behavior. For the most part these are two distinct elements in the safety management system: one is reactive, the other proactive. The basic difference is the method of discovery: the reactive process responds to events that have already occurred, whilst the proactive method actively seeks to identify potential hazards through an analysis of the everyday activities of the company. The exception to this rule occurs when a potential hazard has been reported through the company s safety reporting program.
3 Page 3 of Reactive and Proactive reporting Hazard identification may be reactive or proactive in nature. Occurrence reporting and investigations are essentially reactive. Proactive hazard identification processes actively seek feedback by observing and analyzing routine day-to-day operations. Trend monitoring is used to predict future hazards e.g, FDM and Engine Trend Monitoring. In addition to internal safety assessments and audits, the PIA management utilizes the following hazard identification inputs and methods: Hazard Data Gathering methods DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBILITY DOCUMENT Accident Reporting Form Incident Reporting Form Air Safety Reporting Confidential Reporting Occurrence Reporting (Additional) E forms will be completed by the operating crew and will be handed over to the operations control. SAMS- A web based application for confidential reporting Safe Card (For Confidential Reporting of both HSE and SMS hazards) Safety Risk Assessment (SRA) Pilot-in-command MOR-1 (CAA Form F.1-41) APP A Director Safety & QA MOR-1 (CAA Form F.1-41) APP A Maintenance: Chief Engineer QA CAA 055 (III) APP B Pilot-in-Command MOR (CAA Form F.1-41) APP A Director Safety & QA MOR (CAA Form F.1-41) APP A PCAA AW 114 Engineering & Maintenance Delay incident Reporting APP B Form Cockpit crew CS/ASR/COCKPIT/001 APP D-1 Cockpit / cabin Crew CS/CORE/COCKPIT/001 APP D-2 General Manager Central Control will forward the copy of E series form to Director Safety & QA Director Safety & QA All PIA Employees Safety Action Groups shall maintain (develop, update, keep record) of SRAs, a controlled copy shall be sent to Director Safety & QA for oversight, consolidation and Safety Data base Management & Facilitation. Punctuality & Delay Incidents Report De-Brief Reports Bird Strike Report Near Miss Lightning Strike APP E-1 APP E-2 APP E-3 APP E-4 A web based application for confidential reporting both for air and ground through registered reporters HSE-F-14 A (APP L ) Risk assessment can be done through different means,like SAMS, SAG Meetings, HSE-F-02 A (APP L ), or any other approved document/form
4 6.1.2 Types of Hazard Page 4 of 22 PIA SMS program covers all types of Hazards in its reporting mechanism. Following are the examples of some hazards, but not limited to this list, which are to be reported and analysed for risk assessment and mitigation; a) Inadequate preflight preparation and/or planning. b) Failure to obtain and/or maintain flying speed. c) Failure to maintain direction control. d) Improper level off. e) Failure to see and avoid objects or obstructions f) Mismanagement of fuel. g) Improper inflight decisions or planning. h) Misjudgment of distance and speed. i) Improper operation of flight controls j) Undocumented cannibalization of aircraft parts k) Undocumented maintenance on aircraft. l) Operation of ground equipment without authorization / permission. Vehicles driving without permit license. m) No information/intimation of Missing tools. n) Maintenance of aircraft without consulting AMM / other relevant documents and not following SOP s. o) Birds menace / droppings on Aircraft during groundings. p) Improper receiving of U/S components and loss of components. q) Unattended, U/S and consumable items outside cage. r) 50% aircraft not covered in docks. s) Tire servicing. t) Improper aircraft jacking. u) Aircraft Towing. v) Transportation of Engine for dispatch to cargo Other than these, hazards associated with weather, intended landing sites, exceptions to TCAS alert, operations in conflicting traffic in airspace without radar coverage, flight following capabilities outside controlled airspace and hostile environment are also reported for risk analysis and mitigation All above mentioned hazards associated with operations and maintenance are identified, analyzed and mitigated with control strategies at acceptable level through defined procedures
5 Page 5 of Safety Data Collection and Risk Management By Using SAMS Besides other conventional methods, PIA is also using SAMS for Safety management. SAMS (Safety Assessment and ) is a web based software tool, developed by Airbus, used for processing, measurement and analysis of identified hazards and safety reports. SAMS is a dedicated tool for the enforcement of SMS requirements which is used for hazard identification, risk assessment, and actions management. It is primarily designed for flight operations, Engineering and Maintenance along with other ground & support services. SAMS provides PIA Safety department a platform to submit safety reports, analyse them, perform statistics, record actions taken and manage safety issues. SAMS promote the confidential reporting culture by using options to filter out the reporter s identification information from reports contents. It can also interact with AirFASE, extract selective data and has the ability to produce the information statistically.
6 Page 6 of Terms & Abbreviations associated with SAMS TERM/ABBREVIATION SAMS REPORTER OPERATOR ANALYST GATE KEEPER ADMINISTRATOR REPORT OCCURRENCE ISSUE ACTION ORC KRC SIRA SUBMITTED IN ANALYSIS VALIDATED PROCESSED DEFINITION/DESCRIPTION Safety Assessment Authority to create report and follow actions Authority to create report, Occurrence, issue and initial assessment Authority to create report, Occurrence, issue, final assessment, validation and Safety judgment In addition to analysis roles, authority to identify reporters Authority to manage backhand system issues Identified hazard with proper information A proper filled and analysed report with allocated risk index Potentially severe hazard/report, repeated occurrence To assign the responsibility for mitigation of the risk Occurrence Risk Categorization ( Impact on process) KeyWord Risk Categorization, Safety Issue Risk Assessment Submitted report, ready to create occurrence (if required) and analysis Analysis in progress by the operator and analyst with allocation of risk index Analyst authority for final safety judgment of an Occurrence Completely processed and no longer to be analysed further Key Roles and Work flow in SAMS There are 5 key roles designed in SAMS application from reporting till risk management with their assigned roles described in subsequent sections. 1. Reporter 2. Operator 3. Analyst 4. Gate keeper 5. Administrator
7 Reporter Page 7 of 22 Reporter can be any person, having access to SAMS, who can identify a hazard and generate safety report. The primary function of reporter is to submit reports of potential safety hazards observed during every day work. The assigned roles and work flow of a Reporter are described as under; Report Flow Reporter s Roles Create Safety Reports Access his/her Safety Reports Follow-up on actions assigned Create Safety Report Attach Report Docs Submit Safety Report When the reporter /user is creats a report, this report is not saved in SAMS data base, therefore, it has no status at the moment. For having status it has to be submitted through submit icon. After the submission, a report is considered as submitted and its source data cannot be modified anymore. It carries a unique reference number e.g (SR ). It signifies that report is awaiting for its review and further analysis. A submitted report is available for it to be analysed and create occurrence and then actions, if needed. In SAMS, four standard templates are being used for reporting. These templates contain all basic and standard information relevant to process/operation and situation being reported for analysis and mitigation purpose. Following are the Templates; Cabin Services Cabin reports Other Cabin Crew Reports SMS Staff report Engineering Ground Staff report
8 Page 8 of Operator Maintenance report Security Report Flight Line Operations Air Safety Report ATC Report Line Observation Other Cockpit Crew Report Flight Operations FDA Report Flight Ops Staff report The safety analysis of the report starts at this stage. In addition to the reporters roles, operator can initially analyse the submitted report, create occurrence (with automated system generated unique number OC ), based upon submitted report and assigns action to the relevant process owner. The Operator level is the first significant stage. Departmental/Divisional SAG members can only be designated as an operator with appropriate qualification and experience of relevant process. The assigned roles and work flow of an operator are described as under; Operator Flow Submitted Report De Identified Report Analysis Edit Safety Report Data & Attach Doc Add More & Create Occurrence Start Analysis Operator s Roles In addition to Reporter s roles, Operator can also Create Occurrences Initial Analysis, Not the final analyst Actions to mitigate risks Create Issues Close assigned actions Create Issue Create Actions Close Action (Issue/ Occurrence)
9 Page 9 of (a) Risk assessment Techniques In SAMS, for occurrence, there are two methodologies used, one is Quick ORC, and other is specific to domain/sub domain based keyword Rating of criticality. Both have the numeric values and colour coding parameters, KRC & ORC Values ORC technique using in SAMS for establishing risk, through numeric values and colour coding, are as follows.
10 Page 10 of Analyst When an operator or analyst opens the submitted report, it automatically changes its status from submitted to in Analysis. Safety report is analysed at this level. Supplementary information is filled describing the reporter from an analyst point of view. Additional documents can be attached, and report risk index and occurrence risks (ORC) are defined. The operator can take actions to mitigate risks associated to the identified hazard or situation reported through safety report. Analyst is the most significant level in SAMS risk management process. The role of analyst can be assigned to head of Departmental/Divisional SAG or his/her nominee. Depending upon the scope of the process/operations, role of analyst can be assigned to more than one operator with appropriate qualifications and experience. In addition to Operator s roles, analyst can give final safety judgment and validate the risk index (ORC). The assigned roles and work flow of an analyst are described as under;
11 Page 11 of 22 Analyst Flow Submitted Report De Identified Report Analysis Edit Safety Report Data & Attach Doc Add More & Create Occurrence Edit ORC Validate Risk Index Start Analysis Safety judgment Analyst s Roles In addition to Operator's roles, Analyst can do Final Analysis/judgment Validation authority Close assigned actions Create Issue Create Actions Close Action (Issue/ Occurrence) Supplementary information is filled describing the reporter from an analyst point of view. Additional documents can be attached, and report risk index and occurrence risks (ORC) are defined. Safety report is completely analysed at this level and final safety judgment is made with the authority of validation Gate Keeper In PIA, the primary role of gate keeper is to have the oversight of the SAMS process, from reporting of Hazards till the mitigation of risks with assigned actions. In addition to roles of analyst, gate keeper has the authority of identify a reporter s The gate keeper shall hold the monthly meeting with all analysts on regular basis.
12 Page 12 of Administrator Administrator s role is to maintain the hard ware and software issues of SAMS alongwith maintenance and updation of server and data base. Administrator has to liaison with SAMS backhand support service provider, allocation of authority/access rights as per the corporations laid down procedures Issue (Creation and management) In SAMS, Issues can also be created depending upon the potential severity and history of reoccurrence or with the combination of both. Hazard identification can expose Safety Issues, Furthermore, in SAMS, link with AirFASE database can also established and expose Safety Issues. The Risk assessment technique used in SAMS for issue management is based upon ICAO Risk assessment Guidelines (Both for probability and severity), Note: For further details, SOP for Qualification & Regularization of Roles in SAMS and SAMS user guide/ training material can be referred
13 Page 13 of SAMS Work Flow Management (A Complete Process Map) SAMS WORK FLOW MANAGEMENT Gatekeepr Operator / Analyst Reporter Create Safety Report Follow-up Safety Report To be analyzed To Send the request to gatekeeper, the operator create an Action Analyse Satistics and reports Follow-up Safety issues to be Analyzed Follow-up re identification requests through record Cancel Safety report Submit Safety Report Analyze Safety Report Request Identified Data Create Occurrence Request Identified Data Process Re identification request Create Safety Issue Create Actions Analyze Safety Issue Follow-up Safety Report Analyst Follow-up Actions Status Processed Safety Reports Close Safety issue
14 Page 14 of Other Means of Hazard Identification and Risk management Hazard Identification Sources of hazard identification can be from the voluntary reporting system (SAMS, confidential reporting, safe card, Investigation outcomes, safety survey results, safety case outcomes, pksafe, pksms and audit findings) which are proactive in nature. They can also be through accidents/ incident occurrence reporting forms which is reactive in nature and they can also be through Flight Data Monitoring, Maintenance Data Monitoring and investigation findings. Persons/Groups responsible to carry out risk identification have been mentioned in given table Risk Assessment Technique All identified hazards are to be critically assessed and ranked in order of their risk potential. They may be assessed subjectively by experienced personnel, or they may be assessed using more formal analytical techniques. All Departmental/Divisional heads are responsible for ensuring that area managers in their jurisdiction utilize modern techniques to identify hazards associated, for every task ( both routine and non-routine)) performed in their area of responsibility; these hazards need to be recorded in the data bank, analyzed critically in terms of their severity and probability and prioritized for subsequent address. The reporting forms listed at Hazard Reporting and at various appendices, form part of the Airlines pro-active data collection program. Hazard reports through SAMS are analyzed by designated analysts of relevant operational areas in SAG meetings or special risk assessment sessions. Those hazards have the cross functional implications can be assessed or analyzed in cross functional sessions/meetings. In SAMS, risk index obtained through an predefined automated criteria/parameters based upon industry practices Risk Assessment ~ Tables In Risk Assessment, there are two main factors to consider: the likelihood of the occurrence (table A) and the severity of the consequences ((Table B)) should there be an occurrence. In assessing risks, the defenses that have been put in place to protect against such hazards need to be evaluated. These defenses can, through their absence, misuse, poor design, or conditions contribute to the occurrence or increase the risks. Through such a risk assessment process, a determination can be made as to whether the defenses are adequate. If the defenses are not adequate, then steps should be taken to increase the defenses to eliminate or mitigate the hazard.
15 Page 15 of 22 The departmental SAGs can define more relevant severity & likelihood definitions based on relevance to the risk type. However, if any such tables are made the it must be communicated to Director Safety &QA for approval. The PIA method for estimation of the likelihood of a hazard occurring is based on the following table: (A) Likelihood PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE Qualitative definition Meaning Value Frequent Likely to occur many times (has occurred frequently) 5 Occasional Likely to occur sometimes (has occurred infrequently) 4 Remote Unlikely to occur, but possible (has occurred rarely) 3 Improbable Very unlikely to occur (not known to have occurred) 2 Extremely Almost inconceivable that the event will occur improbable 1 TABLE A The above table specifies the likelihood as qualitative categories, but also includes numerical values for the probabilities associated with each category. In some cases, data may be available which will allow direct numerical estimates of the likelihood of failure to be made. (For example, for the hardware elements of a system, extensive data is often available on historical component failure rates). The estimation of the likelihood of occurrence of hazards associated with human error will generally involve a greater degree of subjective assessment (and it should be borne in mind that even when assessing hardware, there is always the possibility of failures due to human error, for example, incorrect maintenance procedures). The following table (Table B) specifies the severity of the consequences of occurrences. The table also includes the numerical values assigned to severities associated with each category.
16 6.3.5 (B)Severity Scale Page 16 of 22 Aviation definition Catastrophic Hazardous Major Minor SEVERITY OF OCCURRENCES Meaning (Consider both potential or historical aspects) Equipment destroyed Multiple deaths A large reduction in safety margins, physical distress or a work load such that the operators cannot be relied upon to perform their tasks accurately or completely. Serious injury(resulting in permanent disability, loss of limb etc) to a number of people Major equipment damage. A significant reduction in safety margins, a reduction in the ability of the operators to cope with adverse operating conditions as a result of increase in work load, or as a result of conditions impairing their efficiency. Serious incident. Injury to person(s). Nuisance. Operating limitations. Use of emergency procedures. Minor incident. Value A B C D Negligible Little consequences. E TABLE B Safety risk severity is defined as the possible consequences of an unsafe event or condition, taking as reference the worst foreseeable situation. The assessment of the severity of the consequences of the hazard if its damaging potential materializes during operations aimed at delivery of services can be assisted by questions such as: I. How many lives may be lost (employees, passengers, bystanders and the general public)? II. What is the likely extent of property or financial damage (direct property loss to the operator, damage to aviation infrastructure, thirdparty collateral damage, financial and economic impact for Airline)? III. What is the likelihood of environmental impact (spillage of fuel or other hazardous product, and physical disruption of the natural habitat)? IV. What are the likely political implications and/or media interest? Based on the considerations emerging from the replies to questions such as those listed in above, the severity of the possible consequences of an unsafe
17 Page 17 of 22 event or condition, taking as reference the worst foreseeable situation, can be assessed using a safety risk severity table. Table (A) presents a typical safety risk severity table, also a five-point table. It includes five categories to denote the level of severity of the occurrence of an unsafe event or condition, the meaning of each category, and the assignment of a value to each category. As with the safety risk probability table, this table is an example presented for educational purposes only. The acceptability of a risk is dependent on both its likelihood and the severity of its consequences. The product of two factors Likelihood (L) & Severity (S) determines the overall significance of risk. The hazards in tolerable region should be reviewed. Risks in this category are not automatically classed as tolerable. Every case must be reviewed taking into account the benefits which will result from implementation of the proposed changes as well as the risk. In general the PIA philosophy is to follow ALARP or reducing the risk to as low as reasonably practicable. It is necessary to obtain an overall assessment of the safety risk. This is achieved by combining the safety risk probability and safety risk severity tables into a safety risk assessment matrix, an example of which is presented in Table (A). For example, a safety risk probability has been assessed as occasional (4). The safety risk severity has been assessed as hazardous (B). The composite of probability and severity (4B) is the safety risk of the consequences of the hazard under consideration. Extending the discussion said above it can be seen, through this example, that a safety risk is just a number or alphanumerical combination and not a visible or tangible component of the natural world. The color coding in the matrix in Table (A) reflects the tolerability regions in the inverted triangle in Figure (B). The safety risk index obtained from the safety risk assessment matrix must then be exported to a safety risk tolerability matrix that describes the tolerability criteria. The criterion for a safety risk assessed as 4B is, according to the tolerability table in Figure (B), unacceptable under the existing circumstances. In this case, the safety risk falls in the intolerable region of the inverted triangle
18 Page 18 of 22 SAFETY RISK TOLERABILITY TABLES Table (A) Figure 6.3.7(B)
19 Page 19 of Risk Acceptability Matrix As per PIA SMS program, risk acceptability index/sequence would be as under Risk Assessment Index Risk Index in Intolerable region (Red ) Risk Index in tolerable (yellow region) Risk Index in Acceptable region (Green) Suggested Action Criteria Un acceptable under the existing circumstances requires immediate action and/or stopping of operations by the concerned authorities. Risk Control/Mitigation is required. Further Management Decision on cost vs benefit. Implementation of decisions shall also be on priority basis. Acceptable, management may review impact in context of any potential change in environment.. Table 6.3.7(C) Figure 6.3.7(D)
20 6.5 Action Criteria Page 20 of 22 Departmental Safety Action Group SAGs shall initiate actions based on existing risk levels to bring it down to an acceptable level. For this the respective SAG shall prepare a set of possible suggested controls along with their estimated cost, implementation duration and expected impact on existing risk level. The concerned authority shall evaluate amongst the given options, or may suggest a new option for risk review. The concerned management shall take a decision based as appropriate which may be a long term or short term strategy as suited. The minutes initiated in this context shall carry a tag line of immediate action required, on priority basis or standard minute to relate with the Action Criteria. For implementation of approved controls, the respective SAG shall follow-up the matter and verify the implemented controls. Verification shall be done by an independent person not directly involved in the implementation of the decision. Progress report shall also be reviewed and communicated to the departmental/divisional head on regular basis. 6.6 Risk mitigation As analyzed, if the risk does not meet the pre-determined acceptability criteria, an attempt should always be made to reduce it to acceptable region, or if this is not possible, to a level as low as reasonably practicable, using appropriate mitigation procedures. The identification of appropriate risk mitigation measures requires a good understanding of the hazard and the factors contributing to its occurrence, since any mechanism which will be effective in reducing risk will have to modify one or more of these factors. Risk mitigation measures may work through reducing the probability of occurrence, or the severity of the consequences, or both. Achieving the desired level of risk reduction may require the implementation of more than one mitigation measure. The possible approaches to risk mitigation include: a) Revision of the system design; b) Modification of operational procedures; c) Changes to staffing arrangements; and d) Training of personnel to deal with the hazard. The effectiveness of any proposed risk mitigation measures must be assessed by first examining closely whether the implementation of these measures might introduce any new hazards. In that case, the foregoing steps must be repeated by re-estimating hazard severity, the likelihood of the hazard occurring and then evaluating the risk. Once the system is implemented, particular attention should be paid, when evaluating the results of safety performance monitoring, to verifying that the mitigation measures are working as intended.
21 Important Note: Page 21 of 22 Hazard Identification & Risk Management in context of SMS shall focus on Operational Safety hazards that may have a direct impact on operational safety of the airline and performance of personnel in safety critical positions.
22 Page 22 of 22 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
A concept of accident causation
SMS Senior Management Briefing Safety Traditional approach Preventing accidents ¾ Focus on outcomes (causes) ¾ Unsafe acts by operational personnel ¾ Attach blame/punish for failures to perform safely
More informationManagement System Effectiveness
Management System Effectiveness Stockholm 14.11.2016 TE.GEN.00409-001 Concept of Effectiveness 2 The ability to be successful and produce the intended results 3 4 5 Inspector competence - Understanding
More informationMETHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY SPIS- REGULATOR
METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY SPIS- REGULATOR Mohamed Chakib Regional Officer, Safety Implementation, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), MID Office Safety Summit October 2018, KSA Today's Meeting
More informationNew Risk Management Techniques The Way Forward EDUARDO DUERI JLT Aerospace Latam MAY 2017
New Risk Management Techniques The Way Forward EDUARDO DUERI JLT Aerospace Latam MAY 2017 SETTING THE RECORD BASIC CONCEPTS 2 Hazard? 3 Hazards Hazard - A condition or an object with the potential to cause
More informationAccess the Mobile App: Or Search in your App store: COSC2015. #IATA_CabinSafety
Welcome! Access the Mobile App: http://eventmobi.com/cs2015 Or Search in your App store: COSC2015 #IATA_CabinSafety Risk Assessment: Identifying your safety risks Facilitator: Nancy Rockbrune Assistant
More informationAIRCRAFT ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT INVESTIGATION
COVER SHEET TO AMENDMENT 11 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT INVESTIGATION ANNEX 13 TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION NINTH EDITION JULY
More informationSession 4A. Investigation Legislation SEMINAR ON AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INCIDENT INVESTIGATION AUGUST 2014
Session 4A Investigation Legislation SEMINAR ON AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INCIDENT INVESTIGATION 11-15 AUGUST 2014 1 Investigation Legislation Implementation of ICAO SARPs Key provisions in the legislation 2 Implementation
More informationRisk Management Policy and Framework
Risk Management Policy and Framework Risk Management Policy Statement ALS recognises that the effective management of risks is a fundamental component of good corporate governance and is vital for the
More informationIncident Reporting and Investigation
Airside Operational Instruction 09 Incident Reporting and Investigation Airside Operational Instruction 09 CONTENT:- 1. SAFETY REPORTING 2. MANDATORY OCCURRENCE REPORTING 3. AIRSIDE ACCIDENT AND SAFETY
More informationWe will begin the web conference shortly. When you arrive, please type the phone number from which you are calling into the chat field.
Welcome We will begin the web conference shortly. When you arrive, please type the phone number from which you are calling into the chat field. To login to the audio portion of the web conference, dial
More informationFAA ATO s Safety Management System (SMS)
FAA ATO s Safety Management System (SMS) Friends and Partners in Aviation Weather Joan Devine, ATO Safety Service November 11, 2005 15-Dec-05 Federal Aviation 1 Background FAA s ATO is implementing a Safety
More informationNATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Scouts Australia NATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2003 First Published 2003 Reviewed August 2006 in consideration of AS/NZS 4360-2004 and Organisational Performance Since First Published. Amendment by Chair
More informationSafety Committee Prototypical Safety Program Manual
Hazard and Incident Reporting System Policy Effective implementation of the Department's Safety Policy is contingent upon a working system to prevent accidents. Essential to this objective is a program
More informationOutcome: CAA split into Air Services Australia and CASA after two further systemic investigations
Outcome: CAA split into Air Services Australia and CASA after two further systemic investigations The catalyst for the inquiry was the report from the Bureau of Air Safety Investigation on the Monarch
More informationCMP for Special Regs and Safety Issues. 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose Scope Submissions to Australian Sailing:...
CMP Policy - AS i Australian Sailing CMP for Special Regs and Safety Issues 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Purpose... 1 1.2. Scope... 1 1.3. Submissions to Australian Sailing:... 1 2. CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE
More informationCASUALTY ANALYSIS PROCEDURE (document FSI 17/WP.1, annex 2)
CASUALTY ANALYSIS PROCEDURE (document FSI 17/WP.1, annex 2) 1 PROPOSED PROCESS OF ANALYSIS OF CASUALTY INVESTIGATION REPORTS 1.1 Casualty investigation reports are submitted to the IMO Secretariat and
More informationAir Traffic Organization Policy. Air Traffic Organization Safety Management System
Air Traffic Organization Policy ORDER JO 1000.37 Effective Date: March 19, 2007 SUBJ: Air Traffic Organization Safety Management System The purpose of the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) is to provide a
More informationCriteria for Establishing Objectives & Targets
Impacts and Hazards Projects Alignment Process Criteria for Establishing Objectives & Targets Legal & Other Requirements Legal & Other Requirements 2 14 Technological Options 1 1 2 1 8 Financial 1 1 1
More informationHazard Identification and risk management. Patrick PEZZATINI, EUROCOPTER Fleet Safety Dept SMS Manager
Hazard Identification and risk management Patrick PEZZATINI, EUROCOPTER Fleet Safety Dept SMS Manager Agenda 1. Concepts 2. Hazard identification 3. Risk management 4. The importance of event report 5.
More informationESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JCAR-PART
UContents 0BSection No. 4BSubject 7BSUBPART-A General Provision 0T 0T 19.1 0TApplicability0T. 19.3 0TDefinitions.0T 19.5 0TApplication for SMS Acceptance.0T 19.7 0TSMS structure. 19.9 0TPreparation of
More informationSession 5. Process of Accident Investigation SEMINAR ON AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INCIDENT INVESTIGATION AUGUST 2014
Session 5 Process of Accident Investigation SEMINAR ON AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INCIDENT INVESTIGATION 11-15 AUGUST 2014 1 Process of Accident Investigation Investigation Release of information in the course
More informationBeyond Traditional Lagging Indicators. Jorge E. Cortés, HSE Manager for International Operations Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
Beyond Traditional Lagging Indicators Jorge E. Cortés, HSE Manager for International Operations Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. Presentation Objectives To challenge traditional measure of
More informationRisk Management at Central Bank of Nepal
Risk Management at Central Bank of Nepal A. Introduction to Supervisory Risk Management Framework in Banks Nepal Rastra Bank(NRB) Act, 2058, section 35 (a) requires the NRB management is to design and
More informationASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION
International Civil Aviation Organization WORKING PAPER 16/9/16 (Information paper) English and Spanish only 1 ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION TECHNICAL COMMISSION Agenda Item 33: Aviation safety and air navigation
More informationJob Safety Analysis Preparation And Risk Assessment
Job Safety Analysis Preparation And Risk Assessment Sample Only Reference CPL_PCR_JSA_Risk_Assessment Revision Number SAMPLE ONLY Document Owner Sample Date 2015 File Location Procedure Revision Date Major
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Risk Management Framework RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Purpose This Risk Management Framework introduces St. Michael s College s approach to risk management. It includes a definition of risk, a summary of
More informationRisk Assessment Mitigation Phase Risk Mitigation Plan Lessons Learned (RAMP B) November 30, 2016
Risk Assessment Mitigation Phase Risk Mitigation Plan Lessons Learned (RAMP B) November 30, 2016 #310403 Risk Management Framework Consistent with the historic commitment of Southern California Gas Company
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Purpose of Guidelines These guidelines outline the way South West Healthcare operates its Risk Management Program and are to assist the organisation, its divisions, departments
More informationPolicy Number Functional Field. Governance and Management. Related Policies. Policy of Making University Policies.
Policy Title Risk Management Policy Policy Number -0 Functional Field Related Policies Responsibility of Issuing Office Governance and Management Policy of Making University Policies Risk Management Office
More informationScouting Ireland Risk Management Framework
No. SID 124A/15 Gasóga na héireann/scouting Ireland Issued Amended 20 th June 2015 Deleted Source: National Management Committee Scouting Ireland Risk Management Framework Revision Date Description # 20/06/2015
More informationRISK REGISTER POLICY AND PROCEDURE
RISK REGISTER POLICY AND PROCEDURE Lead Manager: Head of Clinical Governance Responsible Director: Board Medical Director Approved by: Date Approved: Date for Review: Feb 2012 Replaces Version: 1.0 Page
More information@ - Presentation Caveat
@ - Presentation Caveat The following presentation was made by Marv Nuss of Nuss Sustainment Solutions at the 2013 Aircraft Airworthiness and Sustainment Conference Australia. The presentation title is:
More informationLOGISTICS ASSISTANCE REPRESENTATIVES
CECOM Directorate of Safety Risk Management Risk Management CECOM LOGISTICS ASSISTANCE REPRESENTATIVES Training Risk Management Why Safety? Battle and Non-battle Casualties Army W.W.II Korea Vietnam DS/S
More informationAn Introductory Presentation for ECU Staff
Risk Management at ECU An Introductory Presentation for ECU Staff Phillip Draber Manager, Risk and Assurance Outcomes By the end of this session you should: Be able to complete and document risk management
More informationJUNEAU RIM PROGRAM SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT APRIL 11, 2017
JUNEAU RIM PROGRAM SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT APRIL 11, 2017 1 Agenda Background Design and Geometry Deficiencies Potential Mitigations SRA, SRM, and SMS 5-Step Process Next Steps 2 BACKGROUND 3 Runway Incursion
More informationRisk Management Framework. Group Risk Management Version 2
Group Risk Management Version 2 RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Purpose The purpose of this document is to summarise the framework which Service Stream adopts to manage risk throughout the Group. Overview The
More informationRisk Management. Webinar - July 2017
Risk Management Webinar - July 2017 Compiled by: Raaghieb Najjaar, Yaeesh Yasseen & Rashied Small Adapted and Facilitated by: Professor Enslin J. van Rooyen Risk Management - June 2017 2 Defining Risk
More informationMYANMAR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BUREAU
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION, MYANMAR MYANMAR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BUREAU ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION POLICY MANUAL First Issue-January 2010 MYANMAR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION MANUAL 0-1-1 SECTION 0 CHAPTER 1
More informationRisk Management. Seminar June Compiled by: Raaghieb Najjaar, Yaeesh Yasseen & Rashied Small
Risk Management Seminar June 2017 Compiled by: Raaghieb Najjaar, Yaeesh Yasseen & Rashied Small Defining Risk Risk reflects the chance that the actual event may be different than the planned / expected
More informationRisk Assessment Workshop Pam Walaski, CSP, CHMM Director, Health and Safety GAI Consultants, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA
Risk Assessment Workshop Pam Walaski, CSP, CHMM Director, Health and Safety GAI Consultants, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA Today s Plan of Action Benefits of Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Definitions Identifying
More informationEnterprise Risk Management Program
Enterprise Risk Management Program David W Sundvall, Risk Manager 3/2/2016 Page 0 of 12 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Approach... 2 Risk Appetite... 3 Roles and Responsibilities... 3 Process... 4
More informationPresented By: Ray Michelena Safety Director / Seminar Instructor T.J.Snow Co., Inc.
Presented By: Ray Michelena Safety Director / Seminar Instructor T.J.Snow Co., Inc. Safety in our industrial facilities is a priority. Industrial plants have a moral and legal obligation to provide equipment
More informationENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) GOVERNANCE POLICY PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
1. Purpose: 1.1. Pedernales Electric Cooperative ( PEC ) is committed to delivering low-cost, reliable and safe energy solutions for the benefit of our members. In order to improve the likelihood of achieving
More informationThe Proactive Quality Guide to. Embracing Risk
The Proactive Quality Guide to Embracing Risk Today s Business Uncertainties Are Driving Risk Beyond the Control of Every Business. Best Practice in Risk Management Can Mitigate these Threats The Proactive
More informationARMS The enabler to understanding Risk
RISK The big picture ARMS The enabler to understanding Risk CHIRP Maintenance Meeting 28 th March 2012 Andrew Rose ARMS Background ARMS Aviation Risk Management Solutions working group Formed in 2007 (Jari
More informationOperational Risk Management
ECAST 17-Dec-08 Presented by: Jari NISULA Mgr, Airline Safety Mgt Systems Operational Risk Management Work by the ARMS WG ARMS Methodology 1. The ARMS Mission 2. The two levels of ARMS Deliverables 3.
More informationRisk Management Framework. Metallica Minerals Ltd
Risk Management Framework Metallica Minerals Ltd Risk Management Framework 23 March 2012 Table of Contents Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Risk Management Approach... 3 3. Roles and Responsibilities...
More informationAIR TRAFFIC SAFETY OVERSIGHT
ORDER 1100.161 CHG 1 AIR TRAFFIC SAFETY OVERSIGHT August 11, 2006 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Initiated By: AOV-1 1100.161 CHG 1 8/11/06 Page ii CHANGE U.S. DEPARTMENT
More informationThe mandatory introduction of civil and military Safety Management Systems: And for the same reasons, in the ADF
The mandatory introduction of civil and military Safety Management Systems: The safety outcomes of the international adoption of a systemic approach to air safety investigation since 1994 have been the
More informationRisk Management Strategy January NHS Education for Scotland RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
NHS Education for Scotland RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY January 2016 1 Contents 1. NES STATEMENT ON RISK MANAGEMENT 2 RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 3 RISK MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES 4 RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESSES 5 RISK
More informationRisk Management & FMEAs. By Jay P. Patel, ASQ Fellow CEO & President QPS Institute
Risk Management & FMEAs By Jay P. Patel, ASQ Fellow CEO & President QPS Institute Learning Objectives Understand Risk management process elements Learn the principles involved in the Risk process Know
More informationREGULATION (EU) NO 376/2014 ON THE REPORTING, ANALYSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF OCCURRENCES IN CIVIL AVIATION
GUIDANCE MATERIAL REGULATION (EU) NO 376/2014 ON THE REPORTING, ANALYSIS AND FOLLOW-UP OF OCCURRENCES IN CIVIL AVIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1... 5 INTRODUCTION... 5 1. How will Regulation (EU) No
More informationRISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT GUIDE RISK CRITERIA
RISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT GUIDE RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE... 3 2. SCOPE... 3 3. RELATED DOCUMENTS... 3 4. PROCEDURE... 3 5. RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS... 3 6. STEP 1 RISK ANALYSIS...
More informationProject Selection Risk
Project Selection Risk As explained above, the types of risk addressed by project planning and project execution are primarily cost risks, schedule risks, and risks related to achieving the deliverables
More informationRisk Assessment for Drug Products with Device Components
Risk Assessment for Drug Products with Device Components Khaudeja Bano, M.D. Senior Medical Director, Medical Device Safety Head, Pharmacovigilance and Patient Safety AbbVie Inc. Process consisting of:
More informationNagement. Revenue Scotland. Risk Management Framework. Revised [ ]February Table of Contents Nagement... 0
Nagement Revenue Scotland Risk Management Framework Revised [ ]February 2016 Table of Contents Nagement... 0 1. Introduction... 2 1.2 Overview of risk management... 2 2. Policy Statement... 3 3. Risk Management
More informationWhat Makes Risk Management Work?
What Makes Risk Management Work? Rick Wells Associate, Risk Management MIRARCO Mining Innovation, Sudbury, Canada w w w. m i r a r c o. o r g Agenda Introduction; Risk Assessment vs Risk Management; Issues
More informationYACHTING AUSTRALIA. Club Risk Management Template. A Practical Resource for Clubs and Centres
YACHTING AUSTRALIA Club Risk Management Template A Practical Resource for Clubs and Centres Club Risk Management Template Safety is Yachting Australia s first priority. In line with upholding this priority,
More informationRisk Management Strategy
Risk Management Strategy 2016 2019 Version: 6 Policy Lead/Author & Deputy Director of Quality position: Ward / Department: Nursing Directorate Replacing Document: Version 5 Approving Committee Quality
More informationSRF09 Issue 01 ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT REPORTING FORM January 2010
GUIDANCE ON COMPLETION OF REPORT FORM These notes are designed to assist in the speedy completion of the form and the initiation of subsequent actions. They are not intended to replace the requirements
More informationRisk Assessment Procedure
1. Introduction Risk Assessment Procedure 1.1 The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 set out general duties which apply to employers and are aimed at improving health and safety management.
More informationBoard Risk Appetite Statement
SH NCP 62 Version: 3 Summary: Keywords (minimum of 5): (To assist policy search engine) Target Audience: This document establishes the key areas of risk and guidance on the level of risk the Board is prepared
More informationASPECTS REGARDING THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF RISKS DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE OF LOW PROBABILITY AND VERY HIGH IMPACT EVENTS
Review of the Air Force Academy No 1 (31) 2016 ASPECTS REGARDING THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF RISKS DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE OF LOW PROBABILITY AND VERY HIGH IMPACT EVENTS Florin-Catalin OLTEANU*, Catalin
More informationKidsafe NSW Risk Management Plan. August 2014
Kidsafe NSW Risk Management Plan August 2014 Document Control Document Approval Name & Position Signature Date Document Version Control Version Status Date Prepared By Comments Document Reviewers Name
More informationRisk Assessment Policy (Trust, Summer, Senior and Prep School & EYFS)
Risk Assessment Policy (Trust, Summer, Senior and Prep School & EYFS) Introduction St Bede s School Trust (hereafter referred to as Bede s) clearly recognises that a failure to take reasonable safety precautions
More informationclient user GUIDE 2011
client user GUIDE 2011 STEP ACTION Accessing Risk Register 1. Type https://www.scm rms.ca/riskregister/login.aspx 2. Click in the Username field on the Risk Register home page. 3. Type your Username and
More informationNagement. Revenue Scotland. Risk Management Framework
Nagement Revenue Scotland Risk Management Framework Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 1.2 Overview of risk management... 2 2. Policy statement... 3 3. Risk management approach... 4 3.1 Risk management
More informationRisk Management Policy and Procedure. Residential, All Areas. AUTHOR(S)/(OWNER): Gráinne Sexton, Quality and Safety Manager SIGNATURE(S): DATE:
REVIEW DATE: 01/09/2018 Page 1 of 17 TITLE: SCOPE: Risk Management Policy and Procedure Residential, All Areas REVIEWED BY: Services Team AUTHOR(S)/(OWNER): Gráinne Sexton, Quality and Safety Manager SIGNATURE(S):
More informationConceptualisation Stage Continued
Conceptualisation Stage Continued Conceptualisation Inputs to conceptualisation stage Influencing factors Stakeholder analysis Feasibility Risk Outputs from conceptualisation stage Risk Structured Approach
More information16985 ESOH Risk Assessment and Acceptance The Basics
Headquarters U.S. Air Force 16985 ESOH Risk Assessment and Acceptance The Basics Mr. Sherman Forbes SAF/AQRE sherman.g.forbes.civ@mail.mil 703-254-2480 30 October 2014 Version 7 1 Risk Management A process
More informationEnterprise Risk Management process at Dragon Oil
Enterprise Risk Management Risk Management Process Dragon Oil s business is potentially exposed to different risks. However, some business risks can be accepted by the Group provided that acceptance of
More informationProject Management in ICT. Prof. Dr. Harald Wehnes
Project Management in ICT Prof. Dr. Harald Wehnes 6.2 Risk management Project Management 1 1 1 Risk management in projects "risk management is project management for adults" Tom De Marco all projects include
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MINING INDUSTRY
RISK ASSESSMENT AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MINING INDUSTRY *Ram Prasad Choudhary Department of Mining Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal-575025 *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT
More informationSection 6: Incident Reporting & Investigation
2012 Section 6: Incident Reporting & Investigation Total Oilfield Rentals LP 10/1/2012 This page left blank intentionally. 6.0. Incident Reporting & Investigation Rev B October 1, 2012 Table of Contents
More informationFraud Risk Management
Fraud Risk Management Fraud Risk Assessment Part 2 2017 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. Fraud Risk Assessment Frameworks Frameworks are helpful for performing, evaluating, and reporting
More informationRisk Assessment Policy
Risk Assessment Policy Updated: April 2018 Date of next Review: April 2019 Policy Lead: Bursar Checked by: Middle Leadership Team 1. INTRODUCTION Beachborough School will have hazards which if not controlled
More informationAPPLICATION OF FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT IN THE LEGAL ACTIVITY OF INTERNATIONAL MARITIME
Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, Vol. 21, No. 4 2014 ISSN: 1231-4005 e-issn: 2354-0133 ICID: 1130510 DOI: 10.5604/12314005.1130510 APPLICATION OF FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT IN THE LEGAL ACTIVITY
More informationTHIRD-PARTY HSEC INCIDENT REPORTING & INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES IMPALA TERMINALS
THIRD-PARTY HSEC INCIDENT REPORTING & INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES IMPALA TERMINALS INTRODUCTION 1.1. PURPOSE Impala Terminals requires that serious Health, Safety, Environmental and Community (HSEC) work-related
More informationTangible Assets Threats and Hazards: Risk Assessment and Management in the Port Domain
Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 5 (2017) 271-278 doi: 10.17265/2328-2142/2017.05.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING Tangible Assets Threats and Hazards: Risk Assessment and Management in the Port
More informationW I T N E S S E T H. Deliverable shall mean the specific and measurable outputs of the Contractor as specified in the Statement of Work.
ANNEX VIII: Service Level Agreement (sample format) Preamble This SLA is made by and between (i) the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), with its headquarters at 20, Avenue Appia, 1211
More informationIncident Reporting and Investigation
Airside Operational Instruction 09 Content 1. Safety Reporting Introduction 2. Mandatory Occurrence Reporting 3. Airside Accident and Safety Occurrence Reporting 4. Internal Safety Investigations Uncontrolled
More informationCowal Gold Project Addendum to the Transport of Hazardous Materials Study
Cowal Gold Project Addendum to the Transport of Hazardous Materials Study On 7 February 2017 the Cowal Gold Project s (the Project) Development Consent (DA 14/98) was modified to reflect approval of the
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Approving authority Approval date University Council 5 August 2013 (3/2013 meeting) Advisor Vice President (Corporate Services) vpcorporateservices@griffith.edu.au (07) 373 57343
More informationSOFTWARE LICENSE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
SOFTWARE LICENSE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS By clicking AGREE, Customer agrees to license the Field Collection System software ( FCS Software ) and to purchase the FCS Software maintenance
More informationRisk Management. Policy and Procedures
Risk Management Policy and Procedures POLICY SCHEDULE Policy title Policy owner Policy lead contact Approving body Date of approval/review Related Guidelines and Procedures Review interval Risk Management
More informationJourney Risk Management for Pune City
Journey Risk Management for Pune City By: Shubham S. Bannore & Ashlesha S. Ithape in association with The Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) What is Journey Risk Management? Journey risk management
More informationRisk Management Policy. September 2015
Risk Management Policy September 2015 Contents Policy Statement... 3 AA s Commitment to Risk Management... 3 Risk Management Principles... 4 Governance Framework... 6 Roles and Responsibilities... 7 Board...
More informationRisk Management: Principles, Methodologies and Techniques. Peter Getugi Internal Audit Manager ILRI
Risk Management: Principles, Methodologies and Techniques Peter Getugi Internal Audit Manager ILRI NAIROBI 22 JUNE, 2010 Session Objectives What is Risk Management? Why is Risk Management importance rising?
More informationChapter 7: Risk. Incorporating risk management. What is risk and risk management?
Chapter 7: Risk Incorporating risk management A key element that agencies must consider and seamlessly integrate into the TAM framework is risk management. Risk is defined as the positive or negative effects
More informationIntegrated Risk Management Framework Sept Page 1 of 17
Integrated Risk Management Framework 2017-2018 Sept 2017 Page 1 of 17 Reference: Title: Author/Nominated Lead: Approval Date: Approving Committee: Review Date: Target Audience: Circulation List: Cross
More informationRisk Management Framework
Risk Management Framework Risk Management Framework 1. The University views Risk Management as integral to the successful execution of its Strategy. In order to achieve the aims set out in our strategy,
More informationVersion: th November 2010 RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
Version: 1.2-25th November 2010 RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Document History Document Location To be completed. Revision History Date of this revision: 17/09/2010 Date of next revision: N/A Revision Number
More informationHazard Prevention Program. Regulation 19
Hazard Prevention Program Regulation 19 Topics Purpose of the regulation Key terminology What is a Hazard Prevention Program? Overview of the regulation Steps for Complying with the Regulation Conclusion
More informationHazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control Procedure
Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control Procedure 1. Purpose To ensure that there is a formal process for hazard identification, risk assessment and control to effectively manage workplace and
More informationRisk Management Policy and Procedures.
Risk Management Policy and Procedures. Rev Date Purpose of Issue/Description of Change Date 1. June 2006 Initial Issue 2. November 2009 Revised and updated 6 th November 2009 3. September 2010 Revised
More informationNOTTINGHAM CITY HOMES. THE BOARD REPORT OF Ian Rabett Head of Health & Safety 26 November 2015
ITEM 9 NOTTINGHAM CITY HOMES THE BOARD REPORT OF Ian Rabett Head of Health & Safety 26 November 2015 RISK MANAGEMENT 1 SUMMARY 1.1 A review of our risk management arrangements was carried out earlier this
More informationILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION POLICY AND INVESTIGATION FORM
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION POLICY AND INVESTIGATION FORM Approved: June 19, 2006 Reviewed and Modified: April 30, 2012 Reviewed: April 25, 2016 TABLE
More information28 July May October 2016
Policy Name Risk Management Policy & Procedure Related Policies and Legislation AISWA Guidelines Risk Management Policy Category Planning & Management Relevant Audience Date of Issue / Last Revision All
More informationCommon Safety Methods CSM
Common Safety Methods CSM A common safety method on risk evaluation and assessment Directive 2004/49/EC, Article 6(3)(a) Presented by: matti.katajala@safetyadvisor.fi / www.safetyadvisor.fi Motivation
More informationHEALTH AND SAFETY 2016 GUIDELINES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT IN EQUESTRIAN EVENTS
HEALTH AND SAFETY 2016 GUIDELINES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT IN EQUESTRIAN EVENTS EVENT RISK MANAGEMENT This is a process to Identify risks Set an acceptable level of risk And to take steps to keep the risk to
More information