FLED D I RECTOR OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
|
|
- Raymond Griffith
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLC SERVCE COMMSSON FLED N THE MAlTER OF THE APPLCATON OF ) SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER 1 COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL ) CHANGE N RATES AND TARFFS 1 SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY D RECTOR FNANCAL ANALYSS SECTON ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL STAFF OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLC SERVCE COMMSSON AUGUST,0
2 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -1- NTRODUCTON Please state your name and business address. My name is Donna Gray. My business address is Arkansas Public Service O 11 j Commission (Commission or APSC), 1000 Center Street, Little Rock, Arkansas,. What is your present position with the Arkansas Public Service Commission General Staff (Staff)? am Director of financial Analysis. Please describe your education and experience. 1 have over twentyeight years experience in utility regulation and rate matters. joined the Staff as a Financial Analyst in 11, and was promoted to Financial Analyst Supewisor in 1. My duties included various economic and financial analyses, most specifically, the determination of the required rate of return for jurisdictional utilities. n 1, was promoted to Manager of the Electric Utilities Section and was responsible for the development of Staffs case in electric utility rate cases and other rate-related matters before the Commission, including the cost of capital for electric utilities. was promoted to Director of Operations in 1 and assumed responsibility for Management Audits, Fiscal Audits, Compliance Audits, Capital Recovery, Quality of Service, and Gas Pipeline Safety. My responsibilities were later expanded to include Consumer Services. assumed my current position in ' sewing as Staff Project Manager in various cases and assisting in the development of Staffs positions in other cases; serving as an expert witness on various capital requirement, revenue requirement, policy and ratemaking issues;
3 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -- O A and overseeing the development of Staffs position on finance, capital recovery, and decommissioning issues. My educational qualifications include a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Missouri State University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville. have attended numerous regulatory training seminars, including the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners' two-week Annual Regulatory Studies Program at Michigan State University, the University of Toronto's Workshop on Public Utility Regulation - Cost of Capital to Public Utilities under the direction of Dr. Myron Gordon, and Standard & Poor's Corporation's Electric Utilities Bond Ratings and Risks. am a member of the Society of Utility and Regulatory Financial Analysts (SURFA) and have sewed on the Board of Directors. 1 have been awarded the professional designation Certified Rate of Return Analyst (CRRA) by SURFA, a designation awarded on the basis of experience and successful completion of a written examination. have testified in numerous cases before the Commission concerning the cost of capital, company-proposed debt and equity issuances, acquisitions, and various other capital requirement, revenue requirement, policy, and ratemaking issues, and have assisted in the development of Staffs position in many more cases. A list of the regulatory proceedings in which have filed testimony is provided in my Surrebuttal Exhibit DG-. PURPOSE OF TESTMONY What is the purpose of your testimony?
4 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -- O A1 The purpose of my testimony is to address the request of Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO) for approval of a Generation Recovery (GR) Rider for its J. Lamar Stal (Stall) plant as presented in the Rebuttal Testimony of Donald R. Moncrief and further discussed in the Rebuttal Testimonies of Company witnesses Thomas P. Brice and Renee V. Hawkins, and the Direct Testimony of Arkansas Attorney General (AG) witness William B. Marcus. SUMMARY OF COMPANY'S PROPOSAL Please summarize the Company's proposed GR Rider as reflected in its RebuttaJ Testimonies. The Company has significantly revised its initial request. The Company's initial request included a proposed GR Rider for recovery of new generation facility costs 1 through two phases. Phase was to provide concurrent recovery of the financing A costs associated with new generation facility construction expenditures before their commercial operation, specifically the John W. Turk, Jr. (Turk) and Stall generation projects. Phase was to provide recovery of depreciation expense and a return on these facilities after commercial operation was commenced, but before being included in base rates. As noted in Mr. rice's Rebuttal Testimony, the Company will defer its request for concurrent recovery of financing costs associated with the Turk plant until the Arkansas Supreme Court has the opportunity to consider and rule upon SWEPCO's pending petition for review. Mr. Brice further outlined that there is merit in implementing a recovery mechanism like Entergy Arkansas, m's Capacity Acquisition Rider (Rider CA) for the Stall plant once it comes into service as
5 SOUTHWESTERN ELKTRG POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY - a O j A ia 1 recommended by AG witness Marcus, and that the Company has incorporated this approach in its Rebuttal request. What primary reasons did the Company suggest in support of its request? Mr. Brice identifies that approval of the GR Rider as proposed would eliminate the need to file a costly new rate case soon after completing this proceeding. He indicated that the Stall plant will be in service approximatejy six months following the imprementation of new rates resulting from this proceeding. He suggests that the Stall plant will bring significant benefits to customers in the form of lower fuel costs, and notes that no party challenged the Commission's Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for the Stall plant granted in Order No. issued June 1, 0, in Docket No. 0-1-U, and that the time for doing so has expired. STAFF SUMMARY POSTON ON GR RDER Does Staff support as reasonable the concept of a GR Rider for SWEPCO, as proposed in its Rebuttal Testimonies, based on the facts specific to this Company at this time? Yes. However, my testimony develops and supports certain revisions to the GR Rider proposed by the Company and certain conditions for ratepayer protections which must be present before Staff can offer full support. Was the proximity of the Stall in-sewice date to the implementation date for rates resulting from this proceeding a factor influencing StaWs support? Yes. As Mr. Brice points out, Stall construction is underway with an anticipated in- service date of approximately six months after the statutory order deadline in this case.
6 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -- 1 O RATEPAYER PROTECTONS n conjunction with the recovery of Stall costs through the GR Rider, how can ratepayers best be protected in terms of any future disallowance of costs upon fu review? Mr. Brice acknowledged on page A of his Rebutta Testimony that the Commission "must issue a final prudence determination to include the Stall-related investment in rate base," and suggests the timing of such can be delayed until the Company files its next rate case. He also provides that the Company would agree to refund the return and depreciation amounts collected under the GR Rider if some portion of the plant investment is found imprudent. Staff supports that ratepayers can best be protected by the Commission explicitly reserving a finding of value for the Stall plant for ratemaking purposes until a future case when base rate recovery is sought. Staff further supports that all collections under GR Rider should be subject to refund, and with interest, after notice and hearing to determine prudence. These provisions are specifically designed to limit ratepayer exposure from overcollection of costs which could subsequently be disallowed in a prudence determination. Do you also recommend that language be added to the GR Rider reflecting that all coections are subject to refund with interest? Yes. recommend that the GR Rider be revised to reflect that all collections are subject to refund, with interest, after notice and hearing to determine prudence as discussed above.
7 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -- 1 RATE OF RETURN WTHN GR RDER Does the Company s GR Rider as proposed equitably balance the interests of ratepayers and shareholders in terms of allowed return on equity? The GR Rider SWEPCO proposes provides considerable certainty to the Company with regard to the collection of the revenue requirement specific to the Stall investment. Given the significant benefits to the Company of this additional rate recovery provision, absent a general rate case proceeding, 1 support that a slightly lower return on equity is appropriate in calculating the Stall revenue requirement and will result in a more equitable balancing of the interests of ratepayers and shareholders. What is your return on equity recommendation to accomplish this sharing of b en efi t? recommend that an equitable balancing of ratepayer and shareholder interests can best be accomplished by a reduced return on equity in the GR Rider, and recommend the return on equity in the GR Rider be set at O%, the bottom end of the range supported by Staff witness Jo Ann Sterling whose recommended range of reasonableness is 10% to 10.%. The resultant pre-tax cost of capital recommend is.0%, as shown in Surrebuttal Exhibit DG-, based on Staffs capital structure, other capital component cost rates, and gross conversion factor athibutable to income taxes. 1 Consistent with Rider CA, the bad debt and forfeited discount percentages within the gross conversion factor would be separatety applied in the GR Rider. Based on Stars recommendation, the gross conversion factor attributable to income taxes for use in developing the before-tax return is 1., and the respective bad debt and forfeited discount percentages are.1% and.%.
8 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY A OTHER CALCULATON NPUTS WTHN G? RDER What are your specific recommendations regarding the language and procedures outlined in the GR Rider reff ected as Mr. Moncrief s Exhibit DRM- R? recommend the definitions of the GR factors or inputs be revised slightly, primarily for clarity and consistency. The accumulated depreciation balance factor (ADEP) definition should be revised to reflect use of the depreciation rates in effect for the Arkansas jurisdiction, consistent with the depreciation expense input (DEPX) definition. The rate of return factor (ROR) definition should be revised to reflect the overall rate of return specific to the GR Rider as approved by the Commission in this case, with the weighted equity component rates grossed-up by the gross conversion factor specific to income taxes. Consistent with Rider CA, the revenue requirement formula should provide for bad debt expense and forfeited discounts as separate factors to be applied as a last step in the development of the revenue requirement. Definitions for these additional factors should also reflect the same language regarding use of the percentages as approved by the Commission in this docket. The stated rate class percentage allocators reflected in Exhibit DRM-R should not necessarily be approved, rather the compliance tariff should reflect the use of the allocators as approved by the Commission in this case. Lastly, the language in the Annual Determination section describing the true-up should be consistent with the definition for this factor (TU). What are your recommendations regarding Staff review of the GR Rider? recommend that the Company s proposed 0-day period for Staff review be
9 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -- 1 O 11 A revised to 0 days, which is consistent with the terms of Rider CA and should allow for a more comprehensive review. ALLOCATON AND RATE DESGN What are your comments on the production allocation factor, RBAF input, proposed in the GR Rider and the rate development? As Staff witness Tom D. Stevens addresses, Staff agrees in principle with the use of the approved production allocation factors for allocation to Arkansas and among the rate classes, and the rate development based on a kwh charge for residential and a percentage of base rates for the other classes. The current language in the GR Rider reflects that the allocation factors as approved shall be used. ESTMATED MPACTS Has the Company provided estimated annua impacts of its proposed GR Rider? Yes. While consistent with my recommendation Staff will be afforded 0 days to review the Company's calculations prior to implementation, the Company provided estimated annual impacts in Mr. Moncriefs Exhibit DRM-R which he revised in 1 response to Staff Data Request APSC-. have included this response as Surrebuttal Exhibit DG-. As shown, the Company currently estimates the plant will be in operation by mid-year 10 with annual rate impacts of between 1. and 1. million dollars. Stated on an annualized basis, the order of magnitude of the increase at initial implementation, as compared to Staffs recommended revenue requirement inclusive of fuel, is less than.% with no significant rate level changes anticipated for the remaining periods. Based on my rate of return
10 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUlTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY recommendations, the rate impact would correspondingly approximate 0. to -l million dollars, or less than.%. What did the Company provide with regard to when it would likely file its next general rate case? n response to Staff Data Request APSC-1, the Company stated that it will need to implement new rates in the last quarter of 1 based on its expected commercial operation of October 1 for Turk. This response is included as my Surrebuttal Exhibit DG-. The likely period of operation for the GR Rider is therefore the last six months of 1 0 through the last quarter of 1. OTHER CONSDERATONS Are there other considerations specific to SWEPCO's request in this rate case which were a consideration influencing Staffs support on this issue? Yes. t is significant to note that SWEPCO undertook a depreciation study in this case and is requesting a significant reduction in depreciation expense on its existing power plants. As noted on page 1 of Mr. Chodak's Direct Testimony: Prudent management of the existing power plants has led to increased life expectancies for these plants as reflected in the extension of the depreciable lives of solid fuel plants from approximately to 0 years and natural gas plants from approximately to years. As discussed by SWEPCO witness Davis, SWEPCO is proposing an increase of approximately 11% in the depreciable lives of its sold-fuel power plants along with other depreciation changes. This depreciation proposal alone reduces SWEPCO's calculated Arkansas retail annual cost of service by approximately $10 million. The results of Staff's analysis are directionally consistent with this overall level of reduction, white producing a slightly greater reduction. Staff commends SWEPCO
11 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -jo- for its willingness to propose significant changes which ensure base rates for existing plant assets are set consistent with the increased life expectancies of those assets, especially during a time of significant construction expenditures. Mr. Chodak pointed to this effort and willingness on page 1 of his Direct Testimony: While the depreciation proposal reduces customers rates, the timing of this change seriously reduces the amount of cash to support SWEPCO s construction program. SWEPCO respectfully requests that the Commission recognize SWEPCOs sejf-imposed reduction in cash flow when considering the request for concurrent recovery of construction financing costs discussed later in this testimony. Ensuring base rates for existing plant assets are reasonably set, significantly 1 reduced in this instance, is especially important for ratepayers during a time period 1 when new plant assets will be added. CONCURRENT RECOVERY OF CONSTRUCTON FJNANCNG COSTS What are your comments regarding Mr. Brice s conclusion that as a matter of policy concurrent recovery is appropriate for investments in new generation? 1 continue to support the position Staff advocated in Docket No. 0-1-U, that being: 0 1 The inclusion of CWP on major electric construction projects may well present the greatest opportunity for the Commission to consider a key risk driver via a special rate recovery mechanism. Given significant differences with regard to construction and construction period among plants, as well as differences in other factors facing utilities and their ratepayers, such a determination can best be made based not on a generic move to foundationaly change regulation in Arkansas, but on the specific circumstances facing a particular utility and its ratepayers.
12 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER COMPANY SURREBUlTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA GRAY -' - O Staff continues to support consideration of this key issue on a case-by-case basis and does not oppose SWEPCO's proposal to defer its request for concurrent recovery of financing costs associated with the Turk plant until the Arkansas Supreme Court has the opportunity to consider and rule on SWEPCO's pending petition for review with the Company's stated intent to pursue concurrent recovery in a separate future proceeding. RECOMMENDATONS SUMMARY Please summarize your recommendations. Based on the facts specific to this Company at this time, Staff supports as reasonable the concept of a GR Rider for SWEPCO, as proposed in its Rebuttal Testimonies and modified to reflect each of the revisions and ratepayer protections outlined in my testimony. Does this conclude your testimony? Yes.
13 CERTFCATE OF SERVCE 1 hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on all parties of record by fotwarding the same.by postage prepaid first class mail, hand delivery andlor electronic mail on August, 0. QtacQ/ Lori L. Burrows
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SEEKING A DECLARATORY ORDER FINDING ITS MUSTANG GENERATION PLANT MODERNIZATION PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH,
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH, IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATION REACHED BETWEEN THE GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PUBLIC INTEREST
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) FOR APPROVAL ) OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ) ELECTRIC SERVICE ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD G. GARNER, CDP SENIOR CAPITAL
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF SOURCEGAS ARKANSAS INC. FOR ) DOCKET NO. -0-U APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE ) IN RATES AND TARIFFS ) REBUTTAL TESTIMONY
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY BARBARA L. CASEY MANAGER, REGULATORY FILINGS ENTERGY SERVICES, INC.
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER FINDING THE DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ANNUAL DETERMINATION OF THE INTEREST. 3URL C, ROTENBERRY, Administrative Law Judge
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ANNUAL DETERMINATION OF THE INTEREST RATE APPLICABLE TO UTILITY CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 1 ) DOCKET NO. 0-10-U ) ORDER NO. 1 1 HEARING BEFORE:
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY ELANA FOLEY SENIOR RATE CASE ANALYST
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES, CHARGES AND TARIFFS SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF ELANA FOLEY SENIOR RATE CASE ANALYST
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES In The Matter of the Petition of Public Service Electric and Gas Company for Approval of an Increase in Electric and Gas Rates and For Changes In the Tariffs
More informationControl Number : Item Number: Addendum StartPage: 0
Control Number : 40443 Item Number: 1090 Addendum StartPage: 0 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-12-7519 ^^ j^ PUC DOCKET NO. 40443 ^^ = J^1( 84 t k PN 42 ^ APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN BEFORE Y =4;r, -, ELECTRIC POWER
More informationAPSC FILED Time: 9/24/2015 9:01:10 AM: Recvd 9/24/2015 9:01:04 AM: Docket u-Doc. 104 ORDER
ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF ) ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR A ) DECLARATORY ORDER REGARDING A ) PURCHASE POWER AGREEMENT FOR A ) RENEWABLE RESOURCE ) DOCKET NO. 15-014-U
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF LIBERTY UTILITIES (PINE BLUFF WATER), ) INC. FOR GENERAL CHANGE OR ) MODIFICATION IN RATES, CHARGES, AND ) TARIFFS )
More informationSTATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED PETITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a VECTREN ENERGY DELIVERY OF IN DIANA, INC., FOR: ( AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT, OWN
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-1) Decoupling
Direct Testimony and Schedule Lisa R. Peterson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT ) APPLICATION OF LIBERTY UTILITIES ) (CENTRAL) CO., LIBERTY SUB CORP., ) AND THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC ) COMPANY FOR ALL NECESSARY
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) DOCKET NO. 0-00-U FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN ) RATES AND TARIFFS ) DIRECT
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DIRECT TESTIMONY LOVITA GRIFFIN, EEP RATE ANALYST
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY ARKANSAS GAS FOR APPROVAL OF ITS QUICK START ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM, PORTFOLIO AND PLAN INCLUDING
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR ) DOCKET NO. 0-0-U APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES ) AND TARIFFS ) DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationAPSC FILED Time: 5/18/2017 2:32:41 PM: Recvd 5/18/2017 2:32:37 PM: Docket U-Doc. 200 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ORDER
ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC ) COMPANYFORAPPROVALOFA ) GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES, CHARGES ) AND TARIFFS ) DOCKET NO. 16-052-U ORDERNO.
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF DAVID E. DISMUKES, PH.D. ON BEHALF OF
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES, CHARGES AND TARIFFS ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated ) electric, steam,
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION OF LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO ELECTRIC) LLC (U 933 E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC (U 933 E) for Authority to Update Rates Pursuant to Its Energy Cost Adjustment
More informationCASE NO.: ER Surrebuttal Testimony of Bruce E. Biewald. On Behalf of Sierra Club
Exhibit No.: Issue: Planning Prudence and Rates Witness: Bruce Biewald Type of Exhibit: Surrebuttal Testimony Sponsoring Party: Sierra Club Case No.: ER-0-0 Date Testimony Prepared: October, 0 MISSOURI
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN THE MATTER OF THE ] PETITION OF SHORELANDS ] BPU Docket No. WR000 WATER COMPANY, INC. FOR ] AN INCREASE IN BASE
More informationAttachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn
Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 2009 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LOAD MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ASSOCIATED
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion to consider changes in the rates of all of the Michigan rate-regulated Case U- electric, steam,
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2017 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationRR16 - Page 1 of
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of ARTHUR P. FREITAS on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationORDER. On June 1, 2015, the General Staff (Staff) of the Arkansas Public Service
ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTINUATION, ) EXPANSION, AND ENHANCEMENT OF ) PUBLIC UTILI'IY ENERGY EFFICIENCY ) PROGRAMS IN ARKANSAS ) DOCKET NO. 13-002-U ORDERNO. 31 ORDER
More informationBOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF ) PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS ) COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN ) EXTENSION OF A SOLAR GENERATION ) INVESTMENT PROGRAM
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTITITIES COMMISSION DG - In the Matter of: Iberdrola USA Enterprises, Inc. and Liberty Utilities (EnergyNorth Natural Gas) Corp. Joint Petition for Approval of Stock Acquisition
More informationPublic Service Commission. November 2,2015. Re: CASE NO E-P MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY and THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY
01 Brooks Street, P.0 Box 1 Charleston, West Virginla 33 Public Service Commission of West Virginia Phone (30) 300300 Fax (30) 3003 November,01 Ingrid Ferrell, Executive Secretary Public Service Commission
More informationKEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014
KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3113 TELECOPIERS: (617) 951-1354 (617) 951-1400 (617) 951-0586 March 17, 2014 Mark Marini, Secretary Department of Public
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PLAN DOCKET NO. M-0- TESTIMONY OF BRIAN J. FITZPATRICK
More informationDocket No U Docket No U FINAL ORDER
Docket No. 11884-U Docket No. 11821-U FINAL ORDER In re: Docket No. 11884-U: Application of Savannah Electric and Power Company to Increase the Fuel Cost Recovery Allowance Pursuant to O.C.G.A. 46-2-26
More informationSOURCEGAS DISTRIBUTION LLC DOCKET NO GR-10 (RECORD NO )
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 SOURCEGAS DISTRIBUTION LLC DOCKET NO. 00--GR- (RECORD NO. ) PRE FILED CROSS ANSWER TESTIMONY OF DON KRATTENMAKER SEMINOLE ENERGY SERVICES LLC I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Q. Please state your
More informationSECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 M) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SDG&E--R SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING)
More informationPrecedent Agreements for KM/TGP NED Project - in New Hampshire
Precedent Agreements for KM/TGP NED Project - in New Hampshire In order to issue a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity FERC requires binding Precedent Agreements between the pipeline applicant
More informationMinnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers Meeting Date: March 6, 2014... Agenda Item # *6 Company: Docket No. Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy E-002/GR-10-971 In the Matter
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF. Denise Kay Parrish
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING Hearing Begins: June 18, 2012 Testimony Filed: May 25, 2012 IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATIONS AND AGREEMENTS On Behalf
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2017 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationRocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Douglas K. Stuver BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 13-035-184 Witness: Douglas K. Stuver BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Douglas K. Stuver Prepaid Pension
More informationPREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U90M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Increase Rates and Charges for Electric and Gas Service Effective on January, 0. A.0--00 (Filed December, 00)
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. Petition for Step Increase. Order Approving Petition
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE 18-036 UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. Petition for Step Increase Order Approving Petition 0 RD ER N 0. 26,123 April 30, 2018 APPEARANCES: Gary Epler,
More informationEXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044
OCA STATEMENT BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. United Water Pennsylvania, Inc. ) ) ) Docket No. R-01-67 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JENNIFER L. ROGERS
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 0000-0-EA- Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward March 0 0 0 Q. Are you the same Joelle
More informationSTATE OF ALASKA. Kate Giard Paul F. Lisankie T.W. Patch Janis W. Wilson
1 2 STATE OF ALASKA THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA 3 4 5 6 Before Commissioners: Robert M. Pickett, Chair Kate Giard Paul F. Lisankie T.W. Patch Janis W. Wilson 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 In the Matter of
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application: 1--XXX Exhibit No.: SDGE-X Witness: Amanda D. White Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 E) and Citizens Energy Corporation for Authorization Pursuant to Public Utilities Code
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Exhibit No. PNM- Page of Public Service Company of New Mexico ) Docket No. ER - -000 PREPARED INITIAL TESTIMONY OF TERRY R. HORN
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. State of Minnesota
Direct Testimony and Schedules Jamie L. Jago Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for
More informationPUC DOCKET NO. I. Business Address and Authorized Representatives The business address of the Company is:
PUC DOCKET NO. NON-STANDARD TRUE-UP FILING OF ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. PURSUANT TO THE FINANCING ORDER IN DOCKET NO. 37247 CONCERNING SCHEDULE SRC PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PETITION Entergy Texas,
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Supplemental Direct Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 20000-520-EA-17 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Direct Testimony of Joelle R. Steward January 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
More information8 18 RH 09. tariffs. SWEPCO S application specifically requests a $53.9 mi~~ion increase in its hkansas
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVIClE COMMISSION 8 8 RH 09 IN TEEE MAWR OF THE APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER DOCKET NO. 09-008-U COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES AND TARIFFS
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
APSC FILED Time: 9/28/202 3:46:09 PM: Recvd 9/28/202 3:37:45 PM: Docket 2-069-u-Doc. 9 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC., MID SOUTH
More informationPUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF YANNICK GAGNE MAY 0, 0 0v. TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationI c*- 1 DOCKET NO U APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR DIRECT TESTIMONY
BEFORE THE [ -+: D ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION I c*- IN THE MATER OF THE APPLICATION OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR ) DOCKET NO. 0-04-U APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE )
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationWHEREAS, Procedural Rule 11 authorizes the Utilities Board to consider and
LCU Board Resolution No. 14-15-LCU014 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, Procedural Rule 11 authorizes the Utilities Board to consider and approve a written stipulation between some or all of the parties to a rate proceeding
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-2) Decoupling and Sales True-Up
Rebuttal Testimony and Schedule Lisa R. Peterson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING APPROVAL TO RETIRE AND ABANDON ITS PLANT X GENERATING STATION UNIT, PLANT
More informationPUC DOCKET NO. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY FOR CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AUTHORIZATION AND RELATED RELIEF FOR THE WIND CATCHER ENERGY CONNECTION
More informationAEP Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants except for AEPTCo. AEPTCo does not have any components of other comprehensive income for any period presented in the financial
More informationDecision D Rebasing for the PBR Plans for Alberta Electric and Gas Distribution Utilities. First Compliance Proceeding
Decision 22394-D01-2018 Rebasing for the 2018-2022 PBR Plans for February 5, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22394-D01-2018 Rebasing for the 2018-2022 PBR Plans for Proceeding 22394 February
More informationThe Commission met on Thursday, May 8, 2014, with Chair Heydinger and Commissioners Boyd, Lange, Lipschultz, and Wergin present. ENERGY AGENDA MEETING
The Commission met on Thursday, May 8, 2014, with Chair Heydinger and Commissioners Boyd, Lange, Lipschultz, and Wergin present. The following matters were taken up by the Commission: ENERGY AGENDA MEETING
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 18-035-01 Witness: Michael G. Wilding BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding March 2018 1
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR ) PSC DOCKET NO. 06-284 A CHANGE IN NATURAL GAS BASE RATES ) (FILED
More informationSDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902M) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A.17-10-007/-008 (cons.) Exhibit: SDG&E-246 SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.
Page of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No. ER- -000 PREPARED TESTIMONY OF Deborah A. Blair XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC.
More information2003 Management s Discussion and Analysis
OGE Energy Corp. 2003 Management s Discussion and Analysis Appendix A to the Proxy statement Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Introduction OGE Energy
More informationSTATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION OUCC SETTLEMENT TESTIMONY OF ON BEHALF OF THE INDIANA OFFICE OF UTILITY CONSUMER COUNSELOR
STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PETITION OF NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC ) SERVICE COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF) CHANGES TO ITS ELECTRIC NET METERING ) TARIFF AND APPROVAL OF AN ELECTRIC )
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARIES. Mr. Fredric Stoffel
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES Mr. Fredric Stoffel Mr. Stoffel provides an overview of the Company s electric rate case filing, outlines the Company s requests, discusses the primary drivers for the revenue increase
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) NON-PROTECTED SURREBUTTAL EXHIBITS JEFF HILTON DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
APSC FILED Time: 11/24/2015 10:57:47 AM: Recvd 11/24/2015 10:46:36 AM: Docket 15-015-U-Doc. 312 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. -R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY WITNESS: ALAN
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationSECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SCG--R SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING)
More informationREDACTED Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Chad A. Teply BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH
REDACTED Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 17-035-40 Witness: Chad A. Teply BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER REDACTED Surrebuttal Testimony of Chad A. Teply
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI In the Matter of the Application of The Empire District Electric Company for Approval of Its Customer Savings Plan. ) ) File No. EO-2018-0092
More informationBEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN 55401-2138 FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 121 7 th Place East, Suite 350 St Paul MN
More informationREBUTTAL TESTIMONY ROBERT B. HEVERT ON BEHALF OF SOURCEGAS ARKANSAS INC.
IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION) OF SOURCEGAS ARKANSAS INC., SOURCEGAS INC., SOURCEGAS LLC, SOURCEGAS HOLDINGS LLC, AND BLACK HILLS UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. FOR ALL NECESSARY AUTHORIZATIONS AND APPROVALS
More informationRR1 - Page 181 of 518
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of JENNIFER S. PYTLIK on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationChase Tower, Eighth Floor. P.O. Box July 13,2018
STEPTOE JOHNS0 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Chase Tower, Eighth Floor P.O. Box Writer s Contact Information Charleston, WV - (0) - -Telephone (0) -000 (0) -0 Fa kurt.krieger@steptoe-johnson.com wwwseptoe-johnson.com
More informationSTATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD : : : : : : : : : : : : MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY S INITIAL BRIEF
STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY Docket No. EAC-2016-0006 Docket No. EAC-2017-0006 MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY S INITIAL BRIEF Table of Contents I. PROCEDURAL
More informationARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Original Sheet No. 44.1 Schedule Sheet 1 of 33 Including Attachments Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Name of Company Kind of Service: Electric Part III. Title: Formula Rate Plan
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF ACCT. NO.: GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ASSESSMENT AUDIT ID: DOCKET NO.: 18-249 PERIOD:
More informationGILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM STREET ALPENA, MICHIGAN May 12, 2015
ROGER C. BAUER JAMES L. MAZRUM JAMES D. FLORIP WILLIAM S. SMIGELSKI TIMOTHY M. GULDEN JOEL E. BAUER DANIEL J. FLORIP GILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI, & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM
More informationResidential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: SCE-1 C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U -E) Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS
Page of CA-T- DOCKET NO. 0-0 DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF RALPH C. SMITH, CPA THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER ADVOCACY SUBJECT: REVENUE REQUIREMENT Page of CA T- Docket No. 0-0 Page of ADIT balance for the
More informationARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Original Sheet No. 44.1 Schedule Sheet 1 of 33 Replacing: Sheet No. Including Attachments Name of Company Kind of Service: Electric Part III. Title: Formula Rate Plan
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-1 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:
More informationColorado PUC E-Filings System
Page 1 of 24 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PROCEEDING NO. 14AL-0660E IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE LETTER NO. 1672 - ELECTRIC OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO REVISE
More information2018 General Rate Case. Tax Update Rebuttal
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: A.16-09-001 SCE-61 M. Childs J. McCarson S. Menon (U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case Tax Update Rebuttal Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
Page 1 of 44 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE ) LETTER NO. 1672-ELECTRIC FILED BY ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) PROCEEDING NO. 14AL-0660E
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) to Establish a Biogas Conditioning & Upgrading Services Tariff
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. on behalf of.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S INTERIM REPORT ON ITS PARTICIPATION IN THE SOUTHWEST POWER POOL REGIONAL TRANSMISSION ORGANIZATION,
More informationTrailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079
Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP- -000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC ) ) ) Docket No. RP- -000 SUMMARY OF PREPARED
More informationNEW HAMPSHIRE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
NEW HAMPSHIRE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. Restructuring Surcharge Compliance Filing, Stranded Cost and Regional Access Charges, and Interim Energy Assistance Program Rate Order Approving Rate Changes O
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationQ. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main
TESTIMONY OF, MANAGER RATES AND REGULATORY STRATEGY ON BEHALF OF DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC CAUSE NO. BEFORE THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 I. INTRODUCTION Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS
More information