BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION"

Transcription

1 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF LIBERTY UTILITIES (PINE BLUFF WATER), ) INC. FOR GENERAL CHANGE OR ) MODIFICATION IN RATES, CHARGES, AND ) TARIFFS ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD G. GARNER, CDP SENIOR CAPITAL RECOVERY ANALYST FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SECTION ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL STAFF OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION NOVEMBER, 0 - -

2 0 0 INTRODUCTION Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is Ronald G. Garner. My business address is Arkansas Public Service Commission (Commission), 000 Center Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 0. Q. In what capacity are you employed at the Commission? A. I am employed by the Commission General Staff (Staff) as a Senior Capital Recovery Analyst in the Financial Analysis Section. In that capacity, I perform analyses of utility companies information; develop Staff s positions as they relate to the utility filings; present those positions when necessary in written and oral testimony before the Commission; and perform other duties as assigned. My primary area of responsibility involves capital recovery issues which include reviewing and developing depreciation rates for the regulated utilities in Arkansas. Q. Briefly describe your education and experience. A. I graduated from the University of Arkansas with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration with a major in Accounting. I also hold a Certified Public Accountant license in the State of Arkansas. After graduation from college I have held accounting and business analyst positions with a company with extensive energy sector operations and with a global leader in marketing services and marketing database information technology solutions. I joined Staff as a Public Utility Auditor in the Audits Section in 00. In that capacity, I analyzed utility company filings, conducted field audits, identified and evaluated accounting issues, developed positions on those issues and - -

3 0 0 presented those positions in written testimony before the Commission. In 00, I was promoted to Capital Recovery Analyst. In that position, I focused on the review of depreciation studies. In 0, I was promoted to the Senior Capital Recovery Analyst position with responsibility for reviewing and conducting comprehensive depreciation studies for utility companies subject to the Commission s jurisdiction. I also review utility requests to maintain or change depreciation rates and evaluate the basis for such requests, as well as developing Staff s case in response. I have previously filed testimony before the Commission. I have regularly participated in utility regulatory training opportunities including The Basics Regulatory Training Seminar sponsored by the Center for Public Utilities, a branch of the College of Business Administration and Economics at New Mexico State University, in conjunction with the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. My training also includes the Depreciation Basics, Life and Net Salvage Analysis, Preparing & Defending A Depreciation Study, and Analyzing The Life of Real-World Property courses sponsored by the Society of Depreciation Professionals (SDP) in conjunction with the Society s Annual Meetings. I am a member of the SDP. Q. Do you hold certification as a depreciation expert? A. Yes, the SDP has established minimum standards for depreciation professionals. Along with those, the SDP administers an examination and has required qualifications to become certified in the field as a Certified Depreciation Professional (CDP). I have met all the requirements and have been awarded the - -

4 0 0 credential of CDP. I regularly pursue professional development and education in the field of depreciation to maintain the CDP designation. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY Q. What is the purpose of your testimony? A. My testimony addresses the proposal by Liberty Utilities (Pine Bluff Water), Inc. (Company or Pine Bluff Water) to change depreciation rates as set forth in Schedule F-. (F-.) included in its Application for a General Change or Modification in Rates and Tariffs filed on July, 0, as amended on July, 0, and including additional schedules filed by the Company on July, 0 in Response to Staff s Notice of Deficiencies (Application). I recommend depreciation rates as presented in Direct Exhibit RG- derived from the parameters presented in Direct Exhibit RG-. My Direct Exhibit RG- contains a representative example of the workpapers supporting my analysis of the Company s plant accounts. Additionally, I discuss depreciation data concerns and recommended reporting requirements. OVERVIEW OF STAFF S RECOMMENDATION Q. Please provide an overview of Staff s recommended depreciation rates. A. I recommend that the depreciation rates submitted on Schedule F-. of the Application be denied. Instead, I recommend that the proposed depreciation rates presented in Direct Exhibit RG- be approved. The recommended rates are derived from the parameters presented in Direct Exhibit RG- and were produced by a detailed, comprehensive depreciation study performed by Staff of Pine Bluff Water s plant accounts. - -

5 Q. Have you compared the composite rates from your proposal with those proposed by the Company? A. Yes. Table below compares the composite rates for each function yielded by applying my recommended rates, the Company's proposed rates, and the currently approved rates to the Company s December, 0, plant in service balances. Table Composite Rate Comparison Function Staff Company Current Source of Supply Plant 0.%.%.% Pumping Plant.%.0%.% Water Treatment Plant.%.%.% Transmission & Distribution Plant.%.0%.0% General Plant.%.%.% Total Plant.%.%.% 0 Q. Where do your recommended depreciation rates appear as an adjustment in the determination of Staff's revenue requirement? A. Using my proposed depreciation rates and amortization amounts and Staff's adjusted plant balances, Staff witness Claude Robertson calculated depreciation expense which is addressed in his Direct Testimony, and included as a component of Adjustment IS-. DISCUSSION OF COMPANY DEPRECIATION STUDY Q. Was the Company required to submit a depreciation study with this request for a change in rates and tariffs? A. Yes. In Order of Docket No. 0-0-U the Commission approved the settlement agreement in which United Water Arkansas, Inc. (UWA) agreed to - -

6 0 0 provide a more current depreciation study with its next general rate case application. Pine Bluff Water agreed to comply with this previously issued Commission order in the Joint Stipulation and Settlement Agreement filed November, 0, in Docket No. -0-U, which was later approved in Order No. of the same docket. Q. Did the Company meet this requirement? A. Yes. As part of the application in this docket, the Company submitted a depreciation study that had been prepared by the consulting firm Gannett Fleming on behalf of UWA using data through December, 0. The depreciation rates derived in that study were proposed by the Company to replace the currently approved depreciation rates. Q. Did any Company witness file testimony with a supporting discussion of the depreciation study? A. No. Company Witness Bourassa merely states that the Company is proposing depreciation rates based upon the study. Q. Do you recommend approval of the depreciation rates derived from the Company-submitted depreciation study? A. No. First, I performed a comprehensive depreciation study which supports my recommended depreciation rates. Second, the study submitted by the Company was based on data through December, 0, and Gannett Fleming stated that the application of those rates was reasonable only for a period of three to five subsequent years. Three years will have passed by the end of the pro forma year. My study uses data - -

7 0 0 through the most recently completed calendar year end, December, 0. Finally, my study considers recent management decisions to purchase AMR meters and the CNG facilities. DESCRIPTION OF STAFF DEPRECIATION STUDY APPROACH Q. What was the nature of the depreciation study you conducted for Pine Bluff Water s plant accounts? A. In conducting my comprehensive depreciation study, I used the depreciation method (straight line), procedure (average life group), and technique (remaining life) that have been approved by the Commission and used repeatedly by Staff in the determination of depreciation rates for Arkansas-jurisdictional utilities. My testimony provides support for the underlying formula and the selected parameters and inputs upon which I relied, and explains how my proposed depreciation rates were developed. My depreciation study workpapers are being made available to the Company and all other parties. My Direct Exhibit RG- contains the workpapers supporting the analysis underlying my recommended depreciation rate for three of Pine Bluff Water s accounts: 0.0 Water Treatment Plant Structures and Improvements;.0 Transmission and Distribution Mains; and.0 Services. The workpapers for the accounts provided are a representative example of my analyses of the Company s other plant accounts. Q. Did you use the same ending point in time as the Company for your study? A. No. As I stated earlier, my study covered historical plant account data through December, 0. Depreciation studies are based on annual data. At the - -

8 0 0 point in time that my study was begun, the most current data available was for the period ending December, 0. The Company study uses data only through 0 which will be more than three years old by the end of the pro forma year. Q. Did you request historical account data from the Company in order to perform your depreciation study? A. Yes. For the life analysis portion of my study, I requested plant account histories for each account including by vintage, additions, retirements, transfers and adjustments, and surviving plant balances for each activity year since plant inception through December, 0. The data provided in response was problematic, which I will discuss in more detail later. For the net salvage analysis portion of my study, I requested salvage and cost of removal history for each water utility plant account through 0. I also requested per book plant balances and accumulated depreciation balances for each plant account as of December, 0. These balances are used in the computation of the depreciation rate and to reconcile the detail historical data balances. Q. Please discuss Staff s concerns with the life analysis data provided. A. The first problem identified was that the account number provided with the historical data did not correspond to the correct NARUC account number that was used in the Company s F-.. Without a matching account number, the data was not usable. In addition, the historical data provided by the Company only included () - -

9 0 0 a listing of assets that were on the books on the date the Company acquired the assets from UWA; () subsequent additions, retirements, transfers and adjustment transactions related to those assets; and () newly acquired assets subsequent to February, 0. Transactions occurring in 0 were partially missing. The Company also provided a data file that had been used by Gannett Fleming to prepare the depreciation study submitted by the Company. However, due to the acquisition of the Company from the previous owner, confirmation that the file did not contain alterations made as part of the Gannet Fleming study was not readily available. Therefore, I was unable to rely on that file in support of my study. Additionally, the file did not contain 0 or 0 data. Q. Did you rely on the responses to the other portions of your request? A. Yes. I was able to rely on both the salvage data and the December, 0 plant and accumulated depreciation balances provided by the Company. Q. How was the life analysis data that you used in your depreciation study compiled? A. Staff compiled the account level historical additions, retirements, and adjustments using the data from the last depreciation study Staff had prepared for the Company in Docket No. --U and data from the Arkansas Annual Reports filed subsequently by the Company. The data was compiled through December, 0, and reconciled to the plant balances that had been provided in response to APSC-0. Q. Do you have a recommendation concerning the life analysis data to be - -

10 0 0 used in future depreciation studies? A. Yes. I recommend that the Company maintain a copy of the data file which Staff compiled and add to it the activity for each account annually. I also recommend that the Company submit the updated file to Staff by April 0 th of each year until the next request for new depreciation rates is made. Q. Have you discussed with the Company the data that you compiled and these recommendations? A. Yes. Staff and representatives of the Company held a teleconference in October 0 and discussed all of these issues. Additionally, Staff met with the Company in Pine Bluff that same month and reviewed the data compiled by Staff and discussed the annual reporting recommendation. To ensure that sufficient data can be provided to the Commission and Staff in support of requests for future depreciation rate changes, Staff also reviewed the Company s plant accounting procedures and made recommendations to assist Pine Bluff Water in complying with the Commission s rules and regulations regarding the maintenance of appropriate plant accounting records. The Company was receptive to the recommendations made in those discussions. Q. Did you conduct a site visit of Pine Bluff Water s plant as a part of your comprehensive depreciation study? A. Yes. Over a period of two days, I visited the Company s offices in Pine Bluff and three of its major plant locations. I observed source of supply wells and equipment, power pumping equipment, water treatment equipment, and one of the distribution water towers. This site visit allowed me to observe representative - 0 -

11 0 0 portions of the Company s plant at these locations and gain valuable insight into the operations of these assets through observation and discussion with Company personnel. DEPRECIATION METHOD, PROCEDURE, AND TECHNIQUE Q. Describe the method, procedure, and technique used in calculating your recommended depreciation rates. A. As noted earlier, my recommended depreciation rates for Pine Bluff Water s plant accounts were developed with the approach repeatedly used by Staff in the determination of depreciation rates for other Arkansas-jurisdictional utilities and approved by the Commission. I used the straight line method, average life group procedure, and remaining life technique. This approach applies a constant annual accrual rate to the cost of the unit, thus yielding a constant annual depreciation accrual over the remaining life of the asset. Under this approach, the plant-in-service balance for a given account is treated as 00%. The accumulated depreciation as a percentage of plant-inservice is the reserve ratio. The net salvage value is also stated as a percentage of the plant-in-service for that account. The depreciation rate is calculated by subtracting the reserve ratio and the net salvage value from the plant-in-service balance (00%) and dividing the remainder by the estimated remaining life in years, as shown in the following formula: Depreciation Rate = (Plant-In-Service Reserve Ratio Net Salvage) Remaining Life As an example, assume that the percentage plant-in-service balance for a - -

12 0 0 given account is 00%, the reserve ratio is 0%, the net salvage value is %, and the remaining life is 0 years. The depreciation rate for this account would be (Plant-In-Service Reserve Ratio Net Salvage) / Remaining Life or (00% - 0% - %) / 0 =.%. DEPRECIATION PARAMETERS Q. Describe the parameters underlying your proposed depreciation rates. A. When using the remaining life technique, the principal components in the depreciation rate formula are the reserve ratio, net salvage value, and remaining life. The remaining life is developed from two parameters, the curve shape and the service life. The parameters used in the calculation of my recommended depreciation rates are presented in Direct Exhibit RG-, and a discussion of the relevant parameters follows. The reserve ratio is the accumulated depreciation balance stated as a percentage of plant-in-service and is calculated for each account. The reserve ratio represents the percentage of plant investment that has been recovered through the annual depreciation accruals. The net salvage value is the difference between gross salvage value and cost of removal. Gross salvage is the value of the plant retired resulting from the sale, reuse, or disposal of the materials. The cost of removal is the cost incurred to remove the property from service. If the gross salvage value is greater than the cost of removal, the net salvage value is positive (income). If the gross salvage value is less than the cost of removal, the net salvage value is negative (expense). - -

13 0 0 The remaining life of a single unit is the remaining years of service or the expected life minus the age. The remaining life for a group of assets is the average remaining life of all units in that group. The remaining life is calculated by applying a particular curve shape and service life to a given account history. The curve shape is based on a selected Iowa curve and represents the dispersion of plant surviving at each age for a particular account. The curve shape for each account is selected through a comparison of standard curve shapes and actual account histories. The curve shape and service life, in turn, are used in the calculation of the average service life and the remaining life. The service life is the total life, from installation to retirement, expected for a particular asset placed into service. This life, combined with a particular curve shape and account history, is used in the determination of the remaining life. The average service life represents the average number of years of service provided by all of the units in a particular account. Q. Please describe the Iowa curves referenced above. A. The Iowa curves, developed at Iowa State University, are a set of curves representing the relationship between age and the percentage of plant investment surviving for various types of property. These curves are widely used in the study of utility property lives for depreciation determination and are similar in nature to the mortality curves used by the insurance industry. In analyzing lives, existing patterns of retirements for each plant account are compared to these curves in order to find the best fit, and thereby calculate future retirements. METHOD OF LIFE ANALYSIS - -

14 0 0 Q. What method of life analysis was used to determine your recommended life parameters? A. I used the Simulated Plant Record Analysis (SPR), a semi-actuarial method of analysis, for Pine Bluff Water s accounts to the greatest extent possible. I am recommending fixed-life amortization for certain general plant accounts. As I stated earlier, Direct Exhibit RG- contains examples of the analyses supporting the life parameters developed through my analysis. Q. How were the life parameters developed using SPR analysis? A. SPR matches the actual account histories to the Iowa curves and calculates simulated plant balances for each Iowa curve shape. The selection of a curve shape and average service life is dependent upon the closeness of the match between the actual and simulated amounts as measured by an index of variation, which is based upon the sum of squared differences between the simulated and actual annual amounts. Staff utilizes a depreciation study module designed for this analysis developed by PowerPlan. Q. What steps were followed in the determination of appropriate Iowa curve shapes and service lives for Pine Bluff Water s plant accounts? A. I evaluated numerous bands of account experience covering different time spans using the individual histories of additions, retirements, and surviving plant balances by year to reveal any trending that might be occurring in this data, as well as to smooth any resulting irregularities in a particular activity or vintage year. I analyzed a full-band and, depending on the specific account, bands of five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty-five and thirty years, as well as rolling 0-year, - -

15 0 0 0-year and 0-year bands, in the determination of an appropriate Iowa curve shape and service life for each plant account. I evaluated the fit of Companyspecific data to the Iowa Curve shapes and services lives generated by the computer based curve matching program across all bands. The optimal Iowa curve shape and average service life estimates were then selected utilizing the results of this statistical analysis along with my knowledge of these accounts. Q. Once the curve shape and service life were selected, how was the average remaining life determined for each plant account? A. The average remaining life was determined by applying a particular curve shape and service life to an account history to calculate the percentage surviving at each age from the earliest age group to the oldest age group (i.e., 0.,.,.,..., x.). After the percentage surviving at each age was determined, the remaining life at each age was calculated. To calculate the average remaining life for the account, the surviving investment at each age was multiplied by the remaining life at each age to calculate a weight for each age, and then the weights were summed and divided by the sum of the surviving investment. Q. Please discuss your life recommendations for account.0. A. Account.0 holds the Company s investment in non-amr meters and meter installations. The Company stated that it follows Commission guidelines for testing meters and that its current procedure is to replace these meters when they are removed for testing. Based on this information, I used a listing of meters by size and manufacture date to calculate the average service life as shown in Direct Exhibit RG-. The remaining life was calculated as discussed previously - -

16 0 0 using my calculated average service life and the currently approved Iowa Curve. Q. How did you determine the life of accounts. and.0? A. Account. is a new account where the Company will record the cost of the AMR meters it plans to install. I have used a 0 year life for the meters, consistent with the Company s response to data request AG--. Account.0 is also a new account. The Company will record the cost of the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) equipment that it is installing in this account. I have used a 0 year life for this equipment based on the vendor design life information provided by Company management. FIXED-LIFE AMORTIZATION Q. Are you recommending fixed-life amortization for certain general plant accounts? A. As I mentioned earlier, I am recommending fixed-life amortization for eleven of the general plant accounts. The accounts are 0.0; 0.0; 0.0;.0;.0;.0;.0;.0;.0;.0; and.0. Q. How is an amortization rate developed? A. Amortization provides a simple way to allocate costs on a straight line basis over the estimated accounting life of an asset. An amortization rate is typically derived by dividing one by the life, and this is my recommendation for these accounts. Q. Has this Commission previously approved fixed-life amortization accounting for the general plant accounts? A. Yes. The Commission has approved amortization accounting, or fixed-life - -

17 0 0 amortization, when recommended by Staff. Recent examples include Docket No U, Docket No. 0-0-U, and Docket No. 0-0-U. Q. Did the Company request an amortization rate for any of these accounts? A. Yes. The Company requested amortization for nine of these accounts. Q. How did you determine the estimated life to be used for each of these accounts? A. For the nine accounts for which the Company requested an amortization rate, I have used the life proposed by the Company. Before accepting this life, I compared it to similar accounts of other Arkansas-jurisdictional utilities and found the proposed life to be reasonable and comparable. Account.0, Transportation Equipment, contains a variety of pickup trucks, vans, and several heavy duty dump trucks. Per discussions with the Company, the pickup trucks are traded after reaching approximately 00,000 miles and the 00 models are reaching that point. The dump trucks last longer. Based on this information, I arrived at a 0 year average service life. For Account.0, Power Operated Equipment, I am recommending a year average service life based on the life approved by the Commission for similar equipment in the latest Entergy Arkansas, Inc. general rate case, Docket No. -0-U. This is comparable and slightly shorter than the currently approved. year average service life for this account. Q. Please describe how Staff s recommended rates should be recorded. A. Staff s rates should be applied to the balance of each account as applicable on the effective date of the Commission order. Investments made after fixed-life - -

18 0 0 amortization takes effect will be fully reserved and retired upon maturing to the stated life for the account. SALVAGE ANALYSIS Q. How did you determine the net salvage values included in the development of your depreciation rates? A. In my analysis of the Company s net salvage values, I relied upon Companyspecific historical retirement, gross salvage and cost of removal data for each plant account. I also relied upon Staff s experience with similar property, including other Arkansas jurisdictional utilities, and knowledge of these accounts. Salvage and removal cost amounts are divided by retirements each year to arrive at annual percentages. The cost of removal is subtracted from the gross salvage to arrive at a net salvage amount for each year as well. This net salvage amount, divided by the retirements for a particular year, produces a net salvage percentage on an annual basis. To arrive at the net salvage values presented in Direct Exhibit RG-, my evaluation of net salvage was based on an analysis of the 0 years of data spanning through 0. I examined the magnitude of the retirements and the associated net salvage and identified any apparent trend in the salvage values for each account, using five- and three-year rolling bands to aid in this analysis. I have included an example of my salvage analysis for Account 0.0 Water Treatment Plant Structures and Improvements in Direct Exhibit RG-. FULLY-RESERVED AND OVER-ACCRUED ACCOUNTS Q. Does Pine Bluff Water have any plant accounts that are fully-reserved or - -

19 0 over-accrued as of your study date? A. Yes. Based on per book plant balances and accumulated reserve balances on service balances that are fully-reserved or over-accrued as shown in Table below. Account Description Table Fully-Reserved and Over-Accrued Accounts December, 0, there are four depreciable plant accounts with plant-in- Plant-In- Service Accumulated Reserve Reserve Ratio Reserve Ratio Maximum Threshold.0 Stores Equipment,, 00% 00%.0 Laboratory Equipment,, 00% 00%.0 Power Operated Equipment,, 00% 00%.0 Other Tangible Equipment,, 00% 00% For those accounts, the accumulated depreciation reserve amount is greater than or equal to the gross plant-in-service amount minus the allowance for net salvage. For ratemaking purposes, depreciation expense should not be calculated on any account with a reserve ratio equal to or exceeding 00%, unless the account has a negative salvage value. Subsequent to December, 0, the Company added plant to account.0. Staff witness Robertson has excluded depreciation expense amounts for the remaining three accounts for the pro forma year. Because investment could be added to these accounts after the pro forma year end, I am recommending the depreciation rates shown in Table be approved for possible future use. - -

20 Account Description Table Fully-Reserved and Over-Accrued Accounts Future Depreciation Rates Recommended Depreciation Rate.0 Stores Equipment.00%.0 Laboratory Equipment.%.0 Power Operated Equipment.%.0 Other Tangible Equipment.00% 0 RECOMMENDATIONS Q. Please summarize your recommendations in this Docket. A. My proposed depreciation rates were calculated using the depreciation method (straight line), procedure (ALG), and technique (remaining life) that have been used repeatedly by Staff in the determination of depreciation rates for Pine Bluff Water and other Arkansas-jurisdictional utilities which were approved by the Commission, and are based on a detailed, statistical analysis of Companyspecific individual account histories on every account possible. My analysis supports the parameters outlined in my Direct Exhibit RG- and the resulting rates presented in my Direct Exhibit RG-. Based on each of the concerns I have outlined in testimony and the results of my comprehensive depreciation study, I recommend the Commission: Deny Pine Bluff Water s proposed depreciation rates as presented in its Application Schedule F-.; Approve the depreciation rates presented in Direct Exhibit RG- for each of Pine Bluff Water s plant accounts (including the application of the rates as - 0 -

21 specified in the footnotes with regard to fully-reserved accounts), using the parameters reflected in Direct Exhibit RG-; Require the Company to maintain a copy of the data file which Staff compiled and add to it each year the activity for each account for that year; and Require the Company to submit the updated data file to Staff by April 0th each year until the next request for new depreciation rates is made. Q. Does this conclude your Direct Testimony? A. Yes. - -

22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Dawn Kelliher Guthrie, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on all parties of record by electronic mail via the Electronic Filing System this th day of November, 0. /s/ Dawn Kelliher Guthrie Dawn Kelliher Guthrie - -

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) FOR APPROVAL ) OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ) ELECTRIC SERVICE ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD G. GARNER, CDP SENIOR CAPITAL

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR ) DOCKET NO. 0-0-U APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES ) AND TARIFFS ) DIRECT TESTIMONY

More information

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 1-- APPLICATION OF THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY DBA EVERSOURCE ENERGY TO AMEND ITS RATE SCHEDULES TESTIMONY OF NED W. ALLIS

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL M. NORMAND

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL M. NORMAND THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG -0 NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL M. NORMAND DEPRECIATION ACCRUAL RATE STUDY EXHIBIT PMND-1 0003 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Stipulating Parties/100 Peng-Andrews-Jenks 1 Docket UM 1626 Stipulating Parties Exhibit 100 Peng, Andrews and Jenks BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON JOINT TESTIMONY OF MING PENG, ELIZABETH

More information

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis Affidavit of Alan Varvis Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER16- -000 AFFIDAVIT OF ALAN VARVIS FOR SOUTHERN

More information

SCHEDULE 3.9. Gannett Fleming Depreciation Study

SCHEDULE 3.9. Gannett Fleming Depreciation Study Review of 2014 Regulatory Financial Statements/2016 Rate Application SCHEDULE 3.9 Gannett Fleming Depreciation Study December 21 2015 Schedule 3.9- Gannett Fleming Depreciation Study ENBRIDGE GAS NEW BRUNSWICK

More information

UGI PENN NATURAL GAS, INC.

UGI PENN NATURAL GAS, INC. PNG Exhibit C (Future) Witness: J. F. Wiedmayer BOOK VII UGI PENN NATURAL GAS, INC. DOCKET NO. R-2016-2580030 2017 DEPRECIATION STUDY CALCULATED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION ACCRUALS RELATED TO GAS PLANT AS OF

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SEEKING A DECLARATORY ORDER FINDING ITS MUSTANG GENERATION PLANT MODERNIZATION PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-1 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE JACOB S. GERTSMAN

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE JACOB S. GERTSMAN STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE JACOB S. GERTSMAN IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION ) OF NEW JERSEY-AMERICAN WATER ) COMPANY, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF ) INCREASED TARIFF RATES

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT ) APPLICATION OF LIBERTY UTILITIES ) (CENTRAL) CO., LIBERTY SUB CORP., ) AND THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC ) COMPANY FOR ALL NECESSARY

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-0-000 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:

More information

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079 Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP- -000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC ) ) ) Docket No. RP- -000 SUMMARY OF PREPARED

More information

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 8 Proceedings held in the above-entitled. 9 matter before Sharon L. Feldman, Administrative Law Judge

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 8 Proceedings held in the above-entitled. 9 matter before Sharon L. Feldman, Administrative Law Judge STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY for Case No. U- Accounting and Ratemaking Approval of Depreciation Rates for

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF SUEZ WATER NEW JERSEY INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR WATER/SEWER SERVICE AND OTHER TARIFF CHANGES BPU DOCKET

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PREPARED TESTIMONY DON MALONE PUBLIC UTILITY AUDITOR ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF OF THE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PREPARED TESTIMONY DON MALONE PUBLIC UTILITY AUDITOR ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF OF THE APR 28 9 0 AM '00 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ) UNBUNDLING OF THE RATES ) OF WOODRUFF ELECTRIC 1 COOPERATIVE CORPORATION ) DOCKET NO. 99-26-U PREPARED TESTIMONY OF

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-1 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:

More information

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L. Met-Ed Statement No. 5 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-2016-2537349 Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L. Adams List of Topics Addressed Cash Working

More information

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * DIRECT TESTIMONY AND ATTACHMENTS OF LISA H.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * DIRECT TESTIMONY AND ATTACHMENTS OF LISA H. Page of BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE LETTER NO. -ELECTRIC FILED BY PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO REVISE ITS PUC NO. -ELECTRIC

More information

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS,INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF. PAlJL M. NORMAND DEPRECIATION

UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS,INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF. PAlJL M. NORMAND DEPRECIATION UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS,INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAlJL M. NORMAND DEPRECIATION New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Docket No. DEI0-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. l)jtroduction 1 II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY III.

More information

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION ) BPU Docket No. GR000 OF PIVOTAL UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. ) OAL Docket No. PUC-0-00N D/B/A

More information

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN- New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Docket No. DG -00 000 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... II. SUMMARY

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES In The Matter of the Petition of Public Service Electric and Gas Company for Approval of an Increase in Electric and Gas Rates and For Changes In the Tariffs

More information

TURN DATA REQUEST-082 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: JULY 12, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: JULY 27, 2018

TURN DATA REQUEST-082 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: JULY 12, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: JULY 27, 2018 1. In SCG-236, at page 5, ll. 6-8, the testimony states, The depreciation study process, factors considered, and proposed depreciation parameters for each account are detailed in SoCalGas direct testimony

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A. Penn Power Statement No. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R-2016-2537355 Direct Testimony of Richard A. D'Angelo List of Topics Addressed Accounting

More information

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 1-- APPLICATION OF THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY DBA EVERSOURCE ENERGY TO AMEND ITS RATE SCHEDULES TESTIMONY OF JENIFER B.

More information

Maritime Electric C A N A D A PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BEFORE THE ISLAND REGULATORY AND APPEALS COMMISSION

Maritime Electric C A N A D A PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BEFORE THE ISLAND REGULATORY AND APPEALS COMMISSION Maritime Electric C A N A D A PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BEFORE THE ISLAND REGULATORY AND APPEALS COMMISSION IN THE MATTER of Section 26 of the Electric Power Act (R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. E- 4) and

More information

Mortality of Beneficiaries of Charitable Gift Annuities 1 Donald F. Behan and Bryan K. Clontz

Mortality of Beneficiaries of Charitable Gift Annuities 1 Donald F. Behan and Bryan K. Clontz Mortality of Beneficiaries of Charitable Gift Annuities 1 Donald F. Behan and Bryan K. Clontz Abstract: This paper is an analysis of the mortality rates of beneficiaries of charitable gift annuities. Observed

More information

INTRODUCTION TO UTILITY DEPRECIATION Building a Fundamental Framework of Concepts and Best Practices

INTRODUCTION TO UTILITY DEPRECIATION Building a Fundamental Framework of Concepts and Best Practices COURSE INTRODUCTION TO UTILITY DEPRECIATION Building a Fundamental Framework of Concepts and Best Practices February 27-28, 2019 The Millennium Knickerbocker Chicago, IL The information presented was in

More information

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS STATEMENT OF INTENT TO CHANGE THE RATE CGS AND RATE PT OF ATMOS PIPELINE TEXAS GUD NO. 10580 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID J. GARRETT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DALLAS MARCH 22,

More information

Exhibit JJS-2. Harrisburg, Pennsytvania. OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Oklahoma City, Oklahoma HOLDING COMPANY ASSETS DEPRECIATION STUDY

Exhibit JJS-2. Harrisburg, Pennsytvania. OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Oklahoma City, Oklahoma HOLDING COMPANY ASSETS DEPRECIATION STUDY Exhibit JJS-2 OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Oklahoma City, Oklahoma HOLDING COMPANY ASSETS DEPRECIATION STUDY, CALCULATED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION ACCRUALS RELATED TO GENERAL PLANT AS OF DECEMBER 31,24

More information

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION First Revised Sheet No. 4-9.1/34 Replacing: Original Sheet No. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Arkansas Gas (Name of Company) Kind of Service:

More information

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR APPROVAL OF INCREASED TARIFF RATES AND CHARGES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE, CHANGE IN DEPRECIATION RATES

More information

BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN

BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN COMMISSIONERS DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF EPCOR WATER ARIZONA INC. FOR A DETERMINATION

More information

2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY

2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY 2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY CALCULATED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION ACCRUALS RELATED TO WATER PLANT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 Prepared by: NEW JERSEY AMERICAN WATER COMPANY Voorhees, New Jersey 2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY

More information

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN THE MATTER OF THE ] PETITION OF SHORELANDS ] BPU Docket No. WR000 WATER COMPANY, INC. FOR ] AN INCREASE IN BASE

More information

I. INTRODUCTION... 4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 III. LEGAL STANDARDS... 8 IV. ANALYTIC METHODS V. LIFE SPAN PROPERTY ANALYSIS...

I. INTRODUCTION... 4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 III. LEGAL STANDARDS... 8 IV. ANALYTIC METHODS V. LIFE SPAN PROPERTY ANALYSIS... TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 III. LEGAL STANDARDS... 8 IV. ANALYTIC METHODS... 10 V. LIFE SPAN PROPERTY ANALYSIS... 12 A. Terminal Net Salvage... 13 B. Future Plant

More information

June 29, Annua! Depreciation Report for The York Water Company

June 29, Annua! Depreciation Report for The York Water Company ^Gannett Fleming ^ S Your Trusted Advisor Since 1915 GANNETT FLEMING, INC. P.O. Box 671 Harrisburg, PA 1716-71 Location: 27 Senate Avenue Camp Hill, PA 1711 Office: (717)763-7211 Fax: (717)763-459 vvww.gannettfleming.com

More information

PPL GAS UTILITIES CORPORATION. Exhibit JJS-2 Depreciation Study Related to Gas Plant At December 31, 2006

PPL GAS UTILITIES CORPORATION. Exhibit JJS-2 Depreciation Study Related to Gas Plant At December 31, 2006 PPL GAS UTILITIES CORPORATION Exhibit JJS-2 Depreciation Study Related to Gas Plant At December 31, 2006 Witness: John J. Spanos Docket No. R-00061398 DOCUMENT OCT 0 5 2006 BECEWED Exhibit No. JJS-2 BEFORE

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG -0 NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG EXHIBIT DLC- 0000 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY...

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A. Penelec Statement No. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R-2016-2537352 Direct Testimony of Richard A. D'Angelo List of Topics Addressed Accounting

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) NON-PROTECTED SURREBUTTAL EXHIBITS JEFF HILTON DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) NON-PROTECTED SURREBUTTAL EXHIBITS JEFF HILTON DIRECTOR OF REVENUE REQUIREMENTS APSC FILED Time: 11/24/2015 10:57:47 AM: Recvd 11/24/2015 10:46:36 AM: Docket 15-015-U-Doc. 312 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.

More information

MERCER Human Resource Consulting

MERCER Human Resource Consulting December 2003 THE CONTRIBUTORY PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF McMASTER UNIVERSITY INCLUDING McMASTER DIVINITY COLLEGE for Funding Purposes as at July 1, 2003 MERCER Human Resource Consulting ~arrh

More information

Rebuttal Testimony and Schedules of:

Rebuttal Testimony and Schedules of: The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF PROPOSED TARIFF CHANGES Rebuttal Testimony and Schedules of: Depreciation - Ned W. Allis Electric Sales Forecast

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY BARBARA L. CASEY MANAGER, REGULATORY FILINGS ENTERGY SERVICES, INC.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY BARBARA L. CASEY MANAGER, REGULATORY FILINGS ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER FINDING THE DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

More information

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0093

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0093 Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP- -000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC ) ) ) Docket No. RP- -000 SUMMARY OF PREPARED

More information

Superseding Sheet No. 96 REVISED SHEET NO. 96 Effective May 4, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013

Superseding Sheet No. 96 REVISED SHEET NO. 96 Effective May 4, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013 Superseding Sheet No. 96 REVISED SHEET NO. 96 Effective May 4, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013 RATE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM PROVISION Rate Adjustment Mechanism ( RAM ) Provision Purpose This mechanism is subject

More information

FLED D I RECTOR OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

FLED D I RECTOR OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLC SERVCE COMMSSON FLED N THE MAlTER OF THE APPLCATON OF ) SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRC POWER 1 COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL ) CHANGE N RATES AND TARFFS 1 SURREBUTTAL TESTMONY OF DONNA

More information

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044 OCA STATEMENT BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. United Water Pennsylvania, Inc. ) ) ) Docket No. R-01-67 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JENNIFER L. ROGERS

More information

Three Pension Cost Methods under Varying Assumptions

Three Pension Cost Methods under Varying Assumptions Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive All Theses and Dissertations 2005-06-13 Three Pension Cost Methods under Varying Assumptions Linda S. Grizzle Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and

More information

CLASS "A" OR "B" WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER UTILITIES (Gross Revenue of More Than $200,000 Each) ANNUAL REPORT. Exact Legal Name of Respondent

CLASS A OR B WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER UTILITIES (Gross Revenue of More Than $200,000 Each) ANNUAL REPORT. Exact Legal Name of Respondent CLASS "A" OR "B" WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER UTILITIES (Gross Revenue of More Than $200,000 Each) ANNUAL REPORT OF Exact Legal Name of Respondent Certificate Number(s) Submitted To The CHARLOTTE COUNTY GOVERNMENT

More information

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TYSON D. PORTER REGULATORY ANALYST.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TYSON D. PORTER REGULATORY ANALYST. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE TARIFF SHEETS ) FILED BY COLORADO NATURAL GAS, INC. ) WITH ADVICE LETTER 89 ) Proceeding No. 18AL- G DIRECT TESTIMONY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF DAVID E. DISMUKES, PH.D. ON BEHALF OF

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF DAVID E. DISMUKES, PH.D. ON BEHALF OF BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES, CHARGES AND TARIFFS ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO.

More information

State of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007

State of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007 State of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007 Prepared: October 2007 Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report Table of

More information

Pension Simulation Project Rockefeller Institute of Government

Pension Simulation Project Rockefeller Institute of Government PENSION SIMULATION PROJECT Investment Return Volatility and the Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System August 2017 Yimeng Yin and Donald J. Boyd Jim Malatras Page 1 www.rockinst.org @rockefellerinst

More information

PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES

PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF EMMANUEL J. LOPEZ ON BEHALF

More information

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 18-035-01 Witness: Michael G. Wilding BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding March 2018 1

More information

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Original Sheet No. 44.1 Schedule Sheet 1 of 33 Including Attachments Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Name of Company Kind of Service: Electric Part III. Title: Formula Rate Plan

More information

Superseding Sheet No. 89 REVISED SHEET NO. 89 Effective April 9, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013 RATE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM PROVISION

Superseding Sheet No. 89 REVISED SHEET NO. 89 Effective April 9, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013 RATE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM PROVISION Superseding Sheet No. 89 REVISED SHEET NO. 89 Effective April 9, 2012 Effective June 1, 2013 RATE ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM PROVISION Rate Adjustment Mechanism ( RAM ) Provision Purpose This mechanism is subject

More information

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO

More information

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PLAN DOCKET NO. M-0- TESTIMONY OF BRIAN J. FITZPATRICK

More information

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES, CHARGES AND TARIFFS DOCKET NO. 16-052-U DIRECT TESTIMONY

More information

2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY

2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY 2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY CALCULATED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION ACCRUALS RELATED TO WASTEWATER PLANT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 Prepared by: Voorhees, New Jersey 2016 DEPRECIATION STUDY CALCULATED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION

More information

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. AND INTELIGENCIA CORPORATIVA SC LTDA.

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. AND INTELIGENCIA CORPORATIVA SC LTDA. AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. AND INTELIGENCIA CORPORATIVA SC LTDA. THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is entered into this _26th day of June, 2017, by and between ENTERPRISE

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LAURENCE M. BROCK

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LAURENCE M. BROCK THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG -0 NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LAURENCE M. BROCK EXHIBIT LMB- 000 TABLE OF CONTENTS II. III. IV. V. A. B. C. D. A.

More information

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF BOB WIECZOREK ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF BOB WIECZOREK ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Application of Southern California Gas Company (U0G) for authority to update its gas revenue requirement and base rates effective on January 1, 01. Application No. -1- Exhibit No.: (SCG-) PREPARED DIRECT

More information

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing TO: FROM: The Honorable Jessica K. Altman Acting Insurance Commissioner, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA Vice President, Actuarial Services DATE: November 29, 2017 RE: Actuarial

More information

RR16 - Page 1 of

RR16 - Page 1 of DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of ARTHUR P. FREITAS on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE

More information

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules

More information

CITY OF FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, Prepared by:

CITY OF FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, Prepared by: ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Prepared by: Patricia Ann Kahle, F.S.A., E.A. Principal and Consulting Actuary and Joel E. Stewart, E.A. Associate Actuary May 2005 1099 Eighteenth Street, Suite

More information

Contents. 1. Summary of Results ($000) Introduction...3 Report on the Actuarial Valuation as at July 1,

Contents. 1. Summary of Results ($000) Introduction...3 Report on the Actuarial Valuation as at July 1, Contents 1. Summary of Results ($000)...1 2. Introduction...3 as at July 1, 2003...3 3. Financial Position of the Plan...6 Valuation Results Going-Concern Basis...6 Valuation Results Solvency Basis...7

More information

Colonial Gas Company d/b/a National Grid Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012

Colonial Gas Company d/b/a National Grid Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 Colonial Gas Company d/b/a National Grid Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 COLONIAL GAS COMPANY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Independent Auditor's Report 2 Balance

More information

FILED JUL COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA

FILED JUL COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) FOR AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ) CAUSE NO. PUD 201100087 AUTHORIZING APPLICANT TO

More information

STATE OF IOWA PEACE OFFICERS RETIREMENT, ACCIDENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM

STATE OF IOWA PEACE OFFICERS RETIREMENT, ACCIDENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM STATE OF IOWA PEACE OFFICERS RETIREMENT, ACCIDENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Certification Letter 1 Executive Summary 1 2 System

More information

PRIVATE. August 7, Ms. Katie White Director of Fiscal Services MiraCosta Community College (MS #6) One Barnard Drive Oceanside, CA 92056

PRIVATE. August 7, Ms. Katie White Director of Fiscal Services MiraCosta Community College (MS #6) One Barnard Drive Oceanside, CA 92056 530 B Street, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101-4404 (p) 619-239-0831 (f ) 619-239-0807 www.nyhart.com August 7, 2015 PRIVATE Ms. Katie White Director of Fiscal Services MiraCosta Community College (MS #6)

More information

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. ELECTRIC SERVICE Effective: June 1, 2009 Filed: May 1, 2009 Supersedes: New Schedule

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. ELECTRIC SERVICE Effective: June 1, 2009 Filed: May 1, 2009 Supersedes: New Schedule ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. ELECTRIC SERVICE Effective: June 1, 2009 Filed: May 1, 2009 RIDER SCHEDULE EFRP-3 Supersedes: New Schedule Schedule Consists of: Three Sheets Plus Attachments A - H Page 33.1

More information

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014 Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1-- Exhibit: SCG- SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE November 01 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES

More information

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main TESTIMONY OF, MANAGER RATES AND REGULATORY STRATEGY ON BEHALF OF DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC CAUSE NO. BEFORE THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 I. INTRODUCTION Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL I/M/O THE PETITION OF PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN ELECTRIC AND GAS RATES

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES NSTAR Electric Company H.O. ) Petition of NSTAR Electric Company and ) each ) d/b/a Eversource Energy for Approval of an Increase ) in Base

More information

MEMORANDUM. CAFR Changes

MEMORANDUM. CAFR Changes MEMORANDUM DATE: February 2, 2015 TO: Members of the Board of Retirement FROM: Brenda Shott, Assistant CEO, Finance and Internal Operations SUBJECT: GASB 67/68 Update Recommendation: Receive and file.

More information

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid PROCEEDING ON MOTION OF THE COMMISSION AS TO THE RATES, CHARGES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION FOR ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICE

More information

LUTHERAN CHURCH - CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN

LUTHERAN CHURCH - CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN Financial Statements of LUTHERAN CHURCH - CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN KPMG LLP Suite 2000 - One Lombard Place Winnipeg MB R3B 0X3 Canada Telephone (204) 957-1770 Fax (204) 957-0808 Internet www.kpmg.ca

More information

THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH

THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION June 30, 2014 and 2013 And Report of Independent Auditor TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR... 1-2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Financial

More information

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. State of Minnesota

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. State of Minnesota Direct Testimony and Schedules Jamie L. Jago Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY GREGORY R. ZAKRZEWSKI REGULATORY PROJECT COORDINATOR, REGULATORY ACCOUNTING

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY GREGORY R. ZAKRZEWSKI REGULATORY PROJECT COORDINATOR, REGULATORY ACCOUNTING BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO. -0-U DIRECT TESTIMONY

More information

LUTHERAN CHURCH - CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN

LUTHERAN CHURCH - CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN Financial Statements of LUTHERAN CHURCH - CANADA DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN KPMG LLP Suite 2000 - One Lombard Place Winnipeg MB R3B 0X3 Canada Telephone Fax Internet (204) 957-1770 (204) 957-0808 www.kpmg.ca

More information

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. AND ASISTENCIA REPRESENTACION EN NEGOCIOS INTERNACIONALES -- MEXICO

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. AND ASISTENCIA REPRESENTACION EN NEGOCIOS INTERNACIONALES -- MEXICO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLORIDA, INC. AND ASISTENCIA REPRESENTACION EN NEGOCIOS INTERNACIONALES -- MEXICO THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is entered into this 23rd_ day of June,

More information

1

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Attachment A TARIFF CONTROL NO. 41663 PETITION OF EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL TO REVISE MILITARY BASE DISCOUNT RECOVERY FACTOR TARIFF PURSUANT TO PURA 36.354 PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated ) electric, steam,

More information

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED PETITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a VECTREN ENERGY DELIVERY OF IN DIANA, INC., FOR: ( AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT, OWN

More information

F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS. Kansas University Endowment Association Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 With Report of Independent Auditors

F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS. Kansas University Endowment Association Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 With Report of Independent Auditors F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS Kansas University Endowment Association Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 With Report of Independent Auditors Ernst & Young LLP Financial Statements Years Ended June 30, 2012 and

More information

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF NEW MEXICO GAS COMPANY, INC. ) FOR APPROVAL OF REVISIONS TO ITS ) RATES, RULES, AND CHARGES PURSUANT ) TO ADVICE

More information

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Application No. A.1-0- Exhibit No.: Witness: Jonathan B. Atun Application of SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC ) COMPANY (U 0 E) For Approval of its ) Application No. 1-0- Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Pilot

More information

Table of Contents. Exhibit

Table of Contents. Exhibit Auditors Reports as Required by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 and Government Auditing Standards and Related Information Year ended Auditors Reports as Required by Office of Management

More information

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018 Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SCG--R SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL, 01

More information

WORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS, INC. I Index 1. II Independent auditor s report 2 3. III Statement of financial position 4

WORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS, INC. I Index 1. II Independent auditor s report 2 3. III Statement of financial position 4 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 Pages I Index 1 II Independent auditor s report 2 3 III Statement of financial position 4 IV Statement of activities and change in net assets 5 V Statement

More information