Chief Financial Officer Paris, October 25, 2013
|
|
- Bertha Miller
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chief Financial Officer Paris, October 25, 2013 Comments on the Exposure Draft ED 2013/7 Insurance Contracts, A revision of ED/2010/8 Insurance Contracts Dear Mr Hoogervorst, In addition to being one of the largest financial institutions in Europe, BNP Paribas has significant insurance operations, particularly in the field of participating investment contracts, life insurance and creditor insurance contracts. The proposals in the ED are relevant to a major portion of our activities. As a member of the CFO Forum and the Fédération Française des Sociétés d Assurance (FFSA), we contributed to their response to the ED. However, we also wish to provide you with our own view, from the perspective of a conglomerate operating in the fields of financial activities and insurance. The French market is highly significant in Europe. In 2012, it accounted for 253 bn in gross written premiums. Technical reserves for Life insurance contracts accounted for 1,496 bn in 2012, including 1,208 bn of mathematical provisions relating to the general fund and 224 bn relating to unit-linked contracts. Due to regulatory requirements, contracts distributed on the French markets are widely homogeneous. The new IASB accounting model fails to reflect the insurance business model faithfully, both in terms of measurement and performance presentation The main concerns we expressed in our comment letter on the 2010 ED remain unaddressed in the current IASB proposal. The economic reality of the insurance business model based on active assetliability management and intergenerational mutualisation is still not reflected appropriately: disaggregation of a portfolio into small subsets e.g. cohorts for the computation of the contractual service margin is not conceptually sound in open portfolios of contracts. As explained below, disaggregation is irrelevant with regard to contractual obligations that demand intergenerational mutualisation; Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 1 / 13
2 contractual obligations are artificially split for measurement and/or presentation purposes irrespective of how contracts are priced, distributed to policyholders and subsequently managed by the insurer; accounting for participating contracts (mirroring approach) requires arbitrary breakdown of cash flows and does not reflect how policyholders participate in realised gains; revenue presented in the statement of profit or loss is artificial and not the aggregate requested by users to date. BNP Paribas supports the development of an alternative model that relies, as primary drivers, on the active asset-liability management and mutualisation inherent to the insurance business model Financial reporting standards should observe the features of insurance and participating contracts, which are based on intergenerational mutualisation Insurance relies on the pooling of risk and the mutualisation of generations of contracts. Diversification is one of the main characteristics of the insurance business model supporting its long-term nature. Portfolios of contracts cannot be disaggregated into cohorts without arbitrary splits as it would disregard the mutualisation of contracts. Existing as well as new investment contracts with discretionary participation features share the results of the insurer s general fund (see opposite). Furthermore, in real life, assets are not managed on a run-off basis to match a closed cohort of contracts. Management decisions both on the investment and the discretionary participation benefits strategyembed future new business assumptions into active asset-liability management and are based on the mutualisation of all contracts in a portfolio. Cost-based information is essential to the contractual obligations as the crediting rate is based on realised gains and losses. As a result, the contract economics do not consider market volatility. The insurance contract standard should consider the diversification and stability that characterize the insurance business and allow the key features of insurance and participating contracts to be faithfully reflected in the financial statements. Key features of French investment contracts with discretionary participation features All contracts participate in the insurer s pool of assets ( general fund ), except for their unit-linked component. Typical contract duration exceeds 8 years, being the minimum time period the policyholder has to hold the contract for its proceeds to be tax free. Active asset-liability management techniques are used for investments in the general fund, not in a closed book perspective, but on the contrary, in an open book perspective taking into account future new business assumptions (i.e. new premiums on contracts in force and new contracts). Active assetliability management aims at maximising the crediting rate to policyholders over the long term and mitigating the effects of short term volatility. The participation benefit account is based on realised investment income of the whole general fund. It does not include unrealised gains on underlying assets. The insurer has discretion over the following items: - amount of gains or losses to be realised; - overall amount of participation benefits allocated to policyholders, considering minimum regulatory and contractual obligations; - timing of allocation of the overall amount of participation benefits to individual policyholders - the overall amount must be allocated within 8 years to individual contracts in force at the date the participation benefit is allocated. 2 / 13
3 Active asset and liability management inherent to the insurance business model should be a primary driver of the proposed measurement approach In the IASB general model, financial assets and insurance liabilities are not measured on a consistent basis, disregarding standard asset-liability management practice. Accounting mismatches would arise if interest sensitive assets such as bonds were carried at amortised cost or at fair value through profit or loss, whereas the effect of changes in discount rates on insurance liabilities is presented in OCI. The measurement of insurance liabilities and underlying assets should be closely connected to asset and liability management. In the mirroring approach, we recognise and support the Board s objective to reflect the interaction between assets and liabilities, even though the proposal is not entirely satisfactory for reasons expressed below. The strong link between assets and liabilities is particularly true for participating contracts, such as the French Life insurance savings contracts and unit-linked contracts. The statement of profit or loss should reflect the underlying performance of our long-term business. It should disregard short term volatility, as it prevents the users of financial statements from understanding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows. BNP Paribas supports the Board s objective of reflecting the interaction between assets and liabilities for contracts with participating features. To avoid accounting mismatches, we believe that all assets backing insurance contract liabilities, including derivatives, should be eligible for measurement at fair value through OCI under IFRS 9. Contracts should be measured as a bundle of rights and obligations consistently with how they are priced, sold and subsequently managed In the IASB proposal, participating insurance contracts are separated into three components with different measurement and presentation requirements. Asset management components may also have to be separated and accounted for under the revenue recognition standard; and investment components that cannot be bifurcated still have to be singled out and excluded from revenues. Further to these conceptual issues, the ED proposals introduce inextricable operational challenges to allocate contractual cash flows (e.g. premiums collected from policyholders, acquisition and contract management costs) to the various components based on objective criteria. BNP Paribas supports a measurement approach that aggregates all cash inflows and outflows relating to a contract into a bundle of rights and obligations, as insurers manage these contracts as a whole. 3 / 13
4 Participating contract measurement should reflect the interaction between assets and insurance liabilities in a single approach applicable to the contract as a whole As already mentioned, the treatment of participating contracts under the mirroring approach is overly complex, leading to possible inconsistencies in practical implementation of the standard. The required breakdown of cash flows is arbitrary as contractual obligations are closely linked. It may not be possible for some cash flows. Indeed, the Board erroneously assumes that cash flows on options and guarantees can be identified and assessed in isolation from other contractual cash flows. Main options and guarantees embedded in French investment contracts with discretionary participation features Options Surrender Policyholders are allowed to surrender their contract before maturity. Surrender may occur on part of the contract s invested assets or on the whole contract. In some countries, surrender penalties may be levied by the insurer, however, this is not the case for BNP Paribas contracts in France [see focus opposite]. Scheduled / unscheduled additional premiums Policyholders are allowed to pay additional premiums on existing contracts at any time. Such payments may be scheduled (from contract inception or at a subsequent date). However, most additional premiums are not scheduled. Conversion Policyholders may decide to convert the contract s surrender value into annuities. Depending on contractual features, the conversion rate may be defined at the inception of the contract or at the time the option is exercised. Switches Policyholders are allowed to switch, during the life of the contract, from the insurer s general fund and unit-linked assets as well as from unit-linked assets to the general fund, or between unitlinked assets. Guarantees Guaranteed Minimum rate Policyholders are entitled to a minimum crediting rate on the component of the contract invested in the insurer s general fund (i.e. excluding the unit-linked component). Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit GMDB Unit-linked contracts may include an additional guarantee triggered by the death of the policyholder. This GMDB guarantees that the contract s beneficiary receives, as a minimum, premiums invested by the policyholder even when cumulated premiums exceed the value of unit-linked assets at the time of death. Focus on surrender options a financial option triggered by policyholder behaviour and moderated by the insurer s actions The surrender option is akin to a swaption, the value of which increases when interest rates rise. However, this option is closely related to other non-financial contract features the insurer s actions as well as policyholder behaviour. The insurer s discretionary decisions on the crediting rate high crediting rates reduce the probability of the option being exercised. Policyholder behaviour is considered in the design of the contract based on expected surrender rates. However, policyholders decisions are not always based on economic rationality. For instance, low crediting rates distributed by the insurer may reduce the amount of new / additional premiums but not trigger surrenders on existing contracts (as seen in 2012 in France). Similarly, massive surrenders ( insurance runs ) were not observed in times of financial crises but may occur when policyholders cast doubt on an insurer s solvency even if such doubts are not backed by fact. Further, a mix of measurement approaches will be used instead of a single measurement approach for the contract taken as a whole. Insurers will encounter extreme difficulties in providing rationale with this piecemeal approach. BNP Paribas advocates a measurement model that reflects the interaction between assets and insurance liabilities for participating contracts and eliminates accounting mismatches. We recommend that the Board overhauls the detailed proposal of the exception to measurement and presentation for these contracts ( mirroring approach ) so as to avoid an arbitrary split of cash flows. The contractual service margin should be adjusted for changes in the valuation of underlying assets, as the insurer s expected profit is changed accordingly. 4 / 13
5 Revenue presented in the statement of profit or loss should be relevant for preparers and other users of the financial statements The definition of revenue proposed by the IASB is artificial and is not the aggregate commonly used by management or requested by users of the financial statements to date. Information usefulness should be carefully assessed with preparers and other users of financial statements. BNP Paribas supports the summarized margin approach as developed in the 2010 ED along with volume information on premiums written and claims paid presented in the notes to the financial statements. Specific presentation and consolidation exemptions should apply to assets held for unit-linked contracts The IASB proposal allows an entity not to derecognize its own financial liabilities and deduct its own shares from equity when they are included in unit-linked funds. It also allows the share of interest in owner-occupied property underlying unit-linked contracts to be measured at fair value through profit or loss. This is consistent with the perfect matching of assets with liabilities required from such contracts. It avoids obscuring financial reporting with presentation mismatches between assets and liabilities that have no economic substance. However, the implementation of the mirroring approach principles to these contracts turns out to be unclear to many constituents, resulting in diverging interpretations of the requirements. The FASB has developed a proposal that requires the classification of assets at fair value through P&L for segregated funds as well as presentation of assets on a separate line item on the face of the balance sheet. Their model also provides for consolidation exemptions for investments funds backing insurance contracts. This approach is more consistent with the respective obligations of policyholders and insurers and provides more useful information to users with simple and obvious evidence of existing (or lack of) mismatches between assets and liabilities. This proposal is also relevant for other unit-linked contracts that do not meet the definition of segregated funds. BNP Paribas supports supplementing the current approach with the FASB proposals, the scope of which should be extended to unit-linked contracts. As a result, we call for an alternative approach that allows for a true and fair transcription of the insurer performance. As our contract obligations and the operating results used internally and externally for performance management rely on cost information, we believe that a cost based approach is relevant to our business model. Insurance fixed-income assets, representing a large part of our investment portfolio, are mostly recovered through contractual interests and redemption of nominal rather than through disposal at a gain or loss. Similarly, insurance liabilities are commonly fulfilled over time rather than transferred to a third party. In this respect, the insurance contract standard should refer back to the business model like IFRS 9, and permit cost measurement for insurance contract obligations that will be fulfilled. However, should the Board maintain its view on current measurement principles, we support a model where short-term market changes impacting the value of assets and insurance liabilities do not impact profit or loss when they eventually unwind. Such short-term market changes hamper proper understanding by management and investors of the operating performance of insurance activities. 5 / 13
6 Accordingly, the contractual service margin should be adjusted to reflect the insurer s expected profit. IFRS 9 should also be modified so that all assets backing insurance contract liabilities, including derivatives, are eligible for measurement at fair value through OCI. It is critical for us that the model be revised to meet the following fundamental principles that ensure the relevance of financial reporting for users: the statement of profit or loss should reflect results that are relevant to the operating performance of the insurer; intergenerational mutualisation between contracts in an open portfolio should be considered in the measurement of insurance contracts, and no computation by generation should be performed; where asset-liability management actively considers future new business and is efficient in matching cash flows of assets and liabilities, no accounting volatility should be reported in profit and loss nor in OCI; the wording of the final standard should be based on sound principles and avoid unnecessary complexity that does not add value to users, whether financial analysts or management, with clear, understandable wording. Clear drafting of financial reporting principles is needed to facilitate the users understanding of IFRS information and comparisons with other financial information issued by insurers, such as Solvency 2 or Market Consistent Embedded Value based on the CFO Forum principles. If the standard leads to financial information that cannot be easily explained and commented on, it will be useless. The effective dates of IFRS 4 phase 2 and IFRS 9 should be aligned to ensure the clarity of financial information and a level playing field for insurers Financial assets represent an essential part of our investments. Successive rounds of deep changes in accounting principles for financial assets and insurance contracts would be detrimental to users understanding of our financial position and performance and could ultimately turn investors away from the insurance industry. As the Board decided recently to defer the implementation of IFRS 9 to an unspecified date, BNP Paribas expects that the IASB aligns the effective dates of the insurance and financial instrument standards. Aligning effective dates will ensure a level-playing field for all issuers of financial statements. If the standards become effective at different dates, financial conglomerates should not be put at a competitive disadvantage if insurance companies can delay IFRS 9 implementation to match the effective date of the insurance contract standard. Insurance companies within financial conglomerates should also be allowed to defer the application of IFRS 9. Extensive fieldwork to test the proposals is needed The proposed requirements include major changes to financial reporting for insurance contracts. We expect that the magnitude of these changes is more complex and costly than the impact of the first time application of IFRS in 2005, all the more so as these proposals are still widely untested in practice at this stage. 6 / 13
7 The implementation of the Solvency 2 prudential regime has implied six rounds of quantitative impact studies, still undergoing, conducted by EIOPA. They have allowed for subsequent improvements before the regime is finalized. Similarly, for the IASB s revised proposal and for the alternative models that are currently being discussed, it is essential that a comprehensive understanding is gained by all market players, to ensure that the proposals will not have unintended consequences and are workable operationally. Obtaining meaningful results from field testing within the limited time available in the current exposure draft comment period is not possible. The three year implementation period prior to the effective date of the standard is also not the appropriate time to perform such field testing. BNP Paribas expects to incur prohibitive costs to implement such changes in accounting principles, as new information needs to be prepared and reporting systems must be reconfigured, compared to the expected benefits. We ask for a thorough cost-benefit analysis to be performed after the field tests. You will find further details on the above comments in the answers to the questions posed in the ED in Appendix A to this letter. We would also like to bring the Board s attention to other technical issues described in appendix B to this letter. If you have any queries regarding our comments, we would be pleased to discuss them further. Sincerely, Lars Machenil 7 / 13
8 Appendix A Question 1 Adjusting the contractual service margin Do you agree that financial statements would provide relevant information that faithfully represents the entity s financial position and performance if: a. differences between the current and previous estimates of the present value of future cash flows related to future coverage and other future services are added to, or deducted from, the contractual service margin, subject to the condition that the contractual service margin should not be negative; and b. differences between the current and previous estimates of the present value of future cash flows that do not relate to future coverage and other future services are recognised immediately in profit or loss? Why or why not? If not, what would you recommend and why? As our contract obligations and the operating results used internally and externally for performance management are based on cost information, we believe that a cost based approach is relevant to our business model. Insurance fixed-income assets, representing a large part of our investment portfolio, are mostly recovered through contractual interests and redemption of nominal rather than through disposal at a gain or loss. Similarly, insurance liabilities are commonly fulfilled over time rather than transferred to a third party. In this respect, the insurance contract standard should refer back to the business model like IFRS 9, and permit cost measurement for insurance contract obligations that will be fulfilled. However, should the Board maintain its view on current measurement principles, we agree that the contractual service margin should be adjusted for changes in estimates of future cash flows related to future coverage and other future services and that it cannot be negative. We supported this proposal in our answer to the 2010 ED. We consider that the contractual service margin corresponds to the unearned profit (risk adjusted) of the insurance contract. Adjusting the contractual service margin will provide relevant information on changes in expected profit. We believe that the contractual service margin should also be adjusted for changes in the risk adjustment relating to future coverage and other future services. This would ensure consistent treatment between changes in the risk adjustment and other changes in estimates of future cash flows. We do not expect significant operational difficulties in assessing the impact of such changes. In addition, for participating contracts, we consider that crediting benefits to policyholders is a service rendered by insurer. Changes in the valuation of underlying assets that impact the amount of future cash flows to policyholders, i.e. paying higher or lower participation benefits, should adjust the contractual service margin as those changes also impact the insurer s unearned profit. The initial computation and subsequent amortization of the contractual service margin should not be performed by generation. The intergenerational mutualisation between contracts in an open portfolio is a fundamental characteristic of insurance and should be reflected in the measurement of insurance contracts. We disagree with the ED s proposal to release the contractual service margin over the insurance coverage period only. We recommend that the margin be released over both the coverage and the claim-handling periods as performance under the contract includes both providing insurance coverage and handling 8 / 13
9 claims during or after the coverage period. The ED is not clear on the treatment of favorable changes in future cash flows when the contractual service margin has been exhausted in prior periods and a loss has been recognized. Favorable changes in future cash flows should be recognized in profit to the extent of the loss recorded in prior periods, with only the excess amount being accounted for as a positive contractual service margin. Question 2 Contracts that require the entity to hold underlying items and specify a link to returns on those underlying items If a contract requires an entity to hold underlying items and specifies a link between the payments to the policyholder and the returns on those underlying items, do you agree that financial statements would provide relevant information that faithfully represents the entity s financial position and performance if the entity: a. measures the fulfilment cash flows that are expected to vary directly with returns on underlying items by reference to the carrying amount of the underlying items? b. measures the fulfilment cash flows that are not expected to vary directly with returns on underlying items, for example, fixed payments specified by the contract, options embedded in the insurance contract that are not separated and guarantees of minimum payments that are embedded in the contract and that are not separated, in accordance with the other requirements of the [draft] Standard (ie using the expected value of the full range of possible outcomes to measure insurance contracts and taking into account risk and the time value of money)? c. recognises changes in the fulfilment cash flows as follows: i. changes in the fulfilment cash flows that are expected to vary directly with returns on the underlying items would be recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income on the same basis as the recognition of changes in the value of those underlying items; ii. iii. changes in the fulfilment cash flows that are expected to vary indirectly with the returns on the underlying items would be recognised in profit or loss; and changes in the fulfilment cash flows that are not expected to vary with the returns on the underlying items, including those that are expected to vary with other factors (for example, with mortality rates) and those that are fixed (for example, fixed death benefits), would be recognised in profit or loss and in other comprehensive income in accordance with the general requirements of the [draft] Standard? Why or why not? If not, what would you recommend and why? We strongly disagree with this proposal. We believe that the objective of reflecting the interaction between assets and liabilities for contracts with participating features should be maintained, but that the current proposal must be overhauled as: the proposed treatment is overly complex, leading to possible inconsistencies in practical implementation of the standard. Indeed, the Board erroneously assumes that cash flows on options and guarantees can be identified and assessed in isolation from other contractual cash flows. The mirroring approach requires an artificial split of these contracts into three pieces with an arbitrary breakdown of the contract s cash flows which the Board acknowledges in BC 130. This split is inconsistent with the way the contract is priced, sold and subsequently managed, i.e. as a bundle of rights and obligations; 9 / 13
10 the mirroring approach implies a mix of measurement instead of a single measurement for the contract taken as a whole. Insurers will encounter extreme difficulties in providing rationale with this piecemeal approach; the mirroring approach is not adapted to French participating contracts (see additional information below), whereby policyholder participation is based on realised investment returns rather than on changes in the fair value of the underlying assets, whereas the Board had specifically analysed these contracts. The measurement and presentation exemption for participating contracts has little use if cash flows arising from the participation feature are measured under the building block approach as they do not vary directly with the underlying items because of the insurer s discretion over the timing of asset disposals and related realised investment gains. Key features of French investment contracts with discretionary participation features All contracts participate in the insurer s pool of assets ( general fund ), except for their unit-linked component. Typical contract duration exceeds 8 years, being the minimum time period the policyholder has to hold the contract for its proceeds to be tax free. Active asset-liability management techniques are used for investments in the general fund not in a closed book perspective, but on the contrary, in an open book perspective taking into account future new business assumptions (i.e. new premiums on contracts in force and new contracts). Active asset-liability management aims at maximising the crediting rate to policyholders over the long term and mitigating the effects of short term volatility. The participation benefit account is based on realised investment income of the whole general fund. It does not include unrealised gains on underlying assets. The insurer has discretion over the following items: - amount of gains or losses to be realised; - overall amount of participation benefits allocated to policyholders, considering minimum regulatory and contractual obligations; - timing of allocation of the overall amount of participation benefits to individual policyholders - the overall amount must be allocated within 8 years to individual contracts in force at the date the participation benefit is allocated. Question 3 Presentation of insurance contract revenue and expenses Do you agree that financial statements would provide relevant information that faithfully represents the entity s financial performance if, for all insurance contracts, an entity presents, in profit or loss, insurance contract revenue and expenses, rather than information about the changes in the components of the insurance contracts? Why or why not? If not, what would you recommend and why? We disagree with the IASB proposal on insurance contract revenue and expenses. The definition of revenue proposed in the ED, based on the expected pattern of claims and benefits, is artificial and cannot be easily reconciled to tangible elements such as the premium written or cash received. This definition of revenue is not commonly used by our management or requested by users of the financial statements. Furthermore, although separation of non-distinct investment components from the host insurance contract would be deemed impossible in the unbundling analysis, such investment components would have to be separated for the calculation of revenue. We believe that the separation would in essence be arbitrary. BNP Paribas supports the summarized margin approach as developed in the 2010 ED along with disclosures of volume information on premiums written and claims paid. 10 / 13
11 Question 4 Interest expense in profit or loss Do you agree that financial statements would provide relevant information that faithfully represents the entity s financial performance if an entity is required to segregate the effects of the underwriting performance from the effects of the changes in the discount rates by: a. recognising, in profit or loss, the interest expense determined using the discount rates that applied at the date that the contract was initially recognised. For cash flows that are expected to vary directly with returns on underlying items, the entity shall update those discount rates when the entity expects any changes in those returns to affect the amount of those cash flows; and b. recognising, in other comprehensive income, the difference between: i. the carrying amount of the insurance contract measured using the discount rates that applied at the reporting date; and ii. the carrying amount of the insurance contract measured using the discount rates that applied at the date that the contract was initially recognised. For cash flows that are expected to vary directly with returns on underlying items, the entity shall update those discount rates when the entity expects any changes in those returns to affect the amount of those cash flows? Why or why not? If not, what would you recommend and why? We disagree with the proposal as it erroneously suggests that the statement of profit or loss would faithfully reflect underwriting performance merely by recording the effects of changes in discount rates in comprehensive income Recognizing the impact of changes in interest rates on insurance contract liabilities in other comprehensive income does not avoid accounting mismatches. Accounting mismatches would arise if interest sensitive assets such as bonds are carried at amortised cost or at fair value through profit or loss, whereas the effect of changes in discount rates on insurance liabilities is presented in OCI. We believe that financial assets and insurance liabilities should be measured on a consistent basis, based on asset-liability management practices. If the current measurement principle for insurance contract liabilities is carried forward to the final standard, IFRS 9 should be modified so that all assets backing insurance contract liabilities, including derivatives, are made eligible for measurement at fair value through OCI. Question 5 Effective date and transition Do you agree that the proposed approach to transition appropriately balances comparability with verifiability? Why or why not? If not, what do you suggest and why? Retrospective application We agree with the proposed approach to transition. We advocated the retrospective application in our answer to the 2010 ED, resulting in the recognition of a contractual service margin on existing contracts. Effective date We ask the Board to align the effective date of the insurance contract standard with the effective date of IFRS 9. Implementing two key standards for the insurance industry at different dates would hinder comparability of the financial statements over time by requiring the presentation of pro-forma analyses over an extended period, and eventually deter investors from groups with significant insurance activities. 11 / 13
12 Aligning effective dates will ensure a level-playing field for all issuers of financial statements. If the standards were to be effective at different dates, financial conglomerates should not be put at a competitive disadvantage if insurance companies can delay IFRS 9 implementation to match the effective date of the insurance contract standard. Insurance companies within financial conglomerates should also be allowed to defer the application of IFRS 9. Question 6 The likely effects of a Standard for insurance contracts Considering the proposed Standard as a whole, do you think that the costs of complying with the proposed requirements are justified by the benefits that the information will provide? How are those costs and benefits affected by the proposals in Questions 1 5? How do the costs and benefits compare with any alternative approach that you propose and with the proposals in the 2010 Exposure Draft? Please describe the likely effect of the proposed Standard as a whole on: a. the transparency in the financial statements of the effects of insurance contracts and the comparability between financial statements of different entities that issue insurance contracts; and b. the compliance costs for preparers and the costs for users of financial statements to understand the information produced, both on initial application and on an ongoing basis. The proposed requirements include major changes to financial reporting for insurance contracts. We expect that the magnitude of these changes is more complex and costly than the impact of the first time application of IFRS in 2005, all the more so as these proposals are still widely untested in practice at this stage. The implementation of the Solvency 2 prudential regime has implied six rounds of quantitative impact studies, still undergoing, conducted by EIOPA. They have allowed for subsequent improvements before the regime is finalized. Similarly, for the IASB s revised proposal and for the alternative models that are currently being discussed, it is essential that a comprehensive understanding is gained by all market players, to ensure that the proposals will not have unintended consequences and are workable operationally. Obtaining meaningful results from field testing within the limited time available in the current exposure draft comment period is not possible. The three year implementation period prior to the effective date of the standard is also not the appropriate time to perform such field testing. BNP Paribas expects to incur prohibitive costs to implement such changes in accounting principles, as new information needs to be prepared and reporting systems must be reconfigured, compared to the expected benefits. We ask for a thorough cost-benefit analysis to be performed after the field tests. Question 7 Clarity of drafting Do you agree that the proposals are drafted clearly and reflect the decisions made by the IASB? If not, please describe any proposal that is not clear. How would you clarify it? As noted above, the analysis of the principles as currently worded in the ED proved extremely difficult in some areas, notably for contracts with participating features that constitute our main business. 12 / 13
13 Appendix B In addition to the comments presented in the cover letter and the detailed comments on the questions asked by the IASB in the ED, we wish to highlight the following issues: we support the ED proposals with regards to: o the explicit risk adjustment required in paragraph 27 and separate contractual service margin. Explicit risk adjustment is common practice for insurers, both for internal and regulatory reporting. It provides greater transparency on the true position of a contract whereas a single composite margin does not distinguish profitable contracts from risky contracts. Furthermore, a composite margin fails to show changes in risks or in the price of bearing risks occurring while the contract is in force, as the margin is not remeasured subsequent to initial recognition. o the scope exception for financial guarantee contracts in paragraph 7 f Financial guarantees have the attributes of both insurance contracts, transferring risks to another party, and financial instruments, the risk transferred often being credit risk. The election permitted under the proposed insurance contract standard better reflects the entity s business model and risk management practices. we disagree with the proposals on disclosures as the overall volume of required disclosures is likely to obscure the information conveyed. Furthermore, we do not agree on the need to disclose the confidence level to which the risk adjustment corresponds. This method may be inappropriate for some types of contracts where the probability distributions are highly skewed. Comparability of information will also be limited as users will not be in a position to reconcile diverging confidence levels. 13 / 13
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. 25 October Dear Mr Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 25 October 2013 Dear Mr Hoogervorst, Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts We would like to thank the IASB
More informationDear Mr. Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Paris, October 25 th 2013 Re: IASB ED / 2013 / 7 Insurance Contracts Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, CNP Assurances
More informationED/2013/7 Insurance Contracts; and Proposed Accounting Standards Update Insurance Contracts (Topic 834)
Tel +44 (0)20 7694 8871 8 Salisbury Square Fax +44 (0)20 7694 8429 London EC4Y 8BB mark.vaessen@kpmgifrg.com United Kingdom Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon
More informationED/2013/7 Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts
Ian Laughlin Deputy Chairman 31 October 2013 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, ED/2013/7 Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts
More informationThe IDW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Exposure Draft Insurance
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 23 October 2013 567/550 Dear Mr Hoogervorst Re.: IFRS Exposure Draft 2013/7
More informationTel: +44 [0] Fax: +44 [0] ey.com. Tel: Fax:
Ernst & Young Global Limited Becket House 1 Lambeth Palace Road London SE1 7EU Tel: +44 [0]20 7980 0000 Fax: +44 [0]20 7980 0275 ey.com Tel: 023 8038 2000 Fax: 023 8038 2001 International Accounting Standards
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. To: Date: 14 January 2014
To: Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Date: 14 January 2014 DP/2013/1: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting Dear
More informationMr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom.
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 21 October 2013 Revised Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts Dear Mr Hoogervorst
More informationInsurance Contracts. June 2013 Basis for Conclusions Exposure Draft ED/2013/7 A revision of ED/2010/8 Insurance Contracts
June 2013 Basis for Conclusions Exposure Draft ED/2013/7 A revision of ED/2010/8 Insurance Contracts Insurance Contracts Comments to be received by 25 October 2013 Basis for Conclusions on Exposure Draft
More informationIFRS 4 Insurance Contracts Phase II Revised ED. Interim AOSSG Meeting 22 September 2013, London Agenda paper 6.1
IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts Phase II Revised ED Interim AOSSG Meeting 22 September 2013, London Agenda paper 6.1 1. Adjusting CSM Do you agree? that an entity should recognise any change in estimates relating
More informationExposure Draft ED 2013/7 - Insurance Contracts
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom
More informationRe: Exposure Draft Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
16 April 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Exposure Draft Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9 On
More informationThe Actuarial Society of Hong Kong IFRS Insurance Contract Phase II Development
The Actuarial Society of Hong Kong IFRS Insurance Contract Phase II Development Jin Peng, PwC 6 November 2013 Agenda Introduction to 2013 Exposure Draft Key Industry Feedback Worldwide Feedback 2 Introduction
More informationIASB/FASB Meeting 10 June 2010
IASB/FASB Meeting 10 June 2010 IASB agenda reference FASB memo reference 1A 49A Project Topic Insurance Contracts Participating investment contracts Introduction 1. This paper discusses whether investment
More informationComments on the IASB s Exposure Draft ED/2013/7 Insurance Contracts
Comments on the IASB s Exposure Draft ED/2013/7 Insurance Contracts Positions of the German Insurance Association Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. German Insurance Association
More informationInsurance Europe comments on the Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
To: From: Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Economics & Finance department Date: 18 November 2015 Reference: ECO-FRG-15-278 Subject:
More informationQuestion 1 Adjusting the contractual service margin
Question 1 Adjusting the contractual service margin Do you agree that financial statements would provide relevant information that faithfully represents the entity s financial position and performance
More informationIASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts
IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts 23 September 2010 KUALA LUMPUR IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts Jeremy Hoon 23 September 2010 KPMG LLP, SINGAPORE OECD Bank Negara Malaysia OECD-Asia Regional
More informationRef: The IASB s Exposure Draft Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts
The Chair Date: 29 January 2016 ESMA/2016/172 Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Ref: The IASB s Exposure Draft Applying IFRS 9
More informationNew IFRS Insurance Contracts Project
IFRS Foundation New IFRS Insurance Contracts Project Vienna, Austria Darrel Scott, IASB Member The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the International
More informationAccounting proposals for insurance contracts
International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting proposals for insurance contracts The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASB or IFRS Foundation.
More informationPractical guide to IFRS 23 August 2010
Practical guide to IFRS 23 August 2010 Insurance contracts Fundamental accounting changes proposed At a glance The IASB ( the board ) released an exposure draft on 30 July 2010 proposing a comprehensive
More informationInsurance alert. also decided that acquisition costs should be presented as part of the margin liability rather than as an asset and that,
www.pwc.com/insurance Insurance alert IASB/FASB Board Meetings and Education Sessions, October 11 and 15-19, 2012 PwC summary of meetings: Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at FASB and IASB meetings,
More informationWe appreciate the opportunity to comment on the exposure draft mentioned above and would like to submit our comments as follows:
Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Düsseldorf, 2 March 2012 540 Dear Mr Hoogervorst Re.: IASB Exposure Draft 2011/6
More informationProposed amendments to IAS 19 and IFRIC 14. IFoA response to IASB
Proposed amendments to IAS 19 and IFRIC 14 IFoA response to IASB 6 November 2015 About the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries is the chartered professional body for
More informationFÉDÉRATION FRANÇAISE DES SOCIÉTÉS D'ASSURANCES
FÉDÉRATION FRANÇAISE DES SOCIÉTÉS D'ASSURANCES 26, Bd HAUSSMANN, 75311 PARIS CEDEX 09 TÉLÉPHONE 01 42 47 90 00 TÉLÉCOPIE 01 42 47 93 11 - http:/www.ifsa.fr/ LE PRESIDENT Paris, December 13 th 2010 Dear
More informationThank you for the opportunity to comment on ED 2013/7 (the ED). We have considered the ED and our comments are set out below.
25 October 2013 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Via online submission: www.ifrs.org Dear Hans ED 2013/7: Insurance
More informationIFRS Project Insights Insurance Contracts
IFRS Project Insights Insurance Contracts October 2015 The International Accounting Standards Board ( IASB / the Board ) is undertaking a comprehensive project on the accounting for insurance contracts,
More informationG m A J THE GENERAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF JAPAN
G m A J THE GENERAL INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF JAPAN 2013-290 oca ~e Non-Life Insurance Building, 9, Kanda Awajicho 2-Chome, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo ~-:- -:!:: -~0 101-8335, Japan Tel:+81-3-3255-1221 October 25,
More informationIFRS 17 issues Reinsurance. Draft for discussion
IFRS 17 issues Reinsurance Draft for discussion 1 Current IASB requirements and TRG conclusions... 1 1.1 IFRS 17 requirements... 1 1.2 TRG... 4 1.3 Current understanding of the accounting treatment...
More informationInsurance contracts. Agenda. Overview of IASB and FASB s proposals on insurance. Presenters/Administrative. Overview of proposals.
Insurance contracts Overview of IASB and FASB s proposals on insurance 28 June 2013 KPMG International Standards Group Agenda 1 2 Presenters/Administrative Overview of proposals 1. Background and overview
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH
THE CHAIRPERSON Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH EBA/2015/D/376 25 November 2015 Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial
More informationRe: Comments on ED/2012/4 Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
China Accounting Standards Committee April 11, 2012 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Mr. Hans Hoogervorst, Re:
More informationAccounting Standards Advisory Forum Insurance Contracts March 2015 Insurance Contracts: Use of OCI for Presentation of Unearned Profits
Accounting Standards Advisory Forum Insurance Contracts March 2015 Insurance Contracts: Use of OCI for Presentation of Unearned Profits Accounting Standards Board of Japan Summary 1. This paper is prepared
More informationThere is a lack of clarity around the interaction between revenue recognition and insurance contracts phase II proposals
Sir David Tweedie International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH 16 June 2009 Dear Sir David, We welcome the opportunity to comment on your Discussion Paper Preliminary Views
More informationRe: Invitation to comment Exposure Draft ED/2012/4 Classification and measurement: Limited amendments to IFRS 9 Proposed amendments to IFRS 9 (2010)
Ernst & Young Global Limited Becket House 1 Lambeth Palace Road London SE1 7EU Tel: +44 [0]20 7980 0000 Fax: +44 [0]20 7980 0275 www.ey.com International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London
More informationThe IASB s Exposure Draft Hedge Accounting
Date: 11 March 2011 ESMA/2011/89 IASB Sir David Tweedie Cannon Street 30 London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom The IASB s Exposure Draft Hedge Accounting The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is
More informationInsurance alert Highlights
www.pwc.com/insurance Insurance alert IASB/FASB Board meetings - Insurance Contracts 18-19 April 2012 PwC Summary of Meetings 18-19 April 2012 IASB and FASB joint decision-making board meeting and FASB
More informationInsurance Contracts Discount rates, risk adjustment and OCI option. CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli +44 (0)
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting December 2018 Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Discount rates, risk adjustment and OCI option CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli rravelli@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6935 This paper
More information12 February International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom. Dear Mr Hoogervorst,
12 February 2016 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Mr Hoogervorst, Re: IASB ED/2015/11 Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with IFRS 4 Insurance
More informationApplying IFRS 17. A closer look at the new Insurance Contracts Standard. May 2018
Applying IFRS 17 A closer look at the new Insurance Contracts Standard May 2018 Contents Introduction... 6 1. Overview of IFRS 17... 7 2. Scope and definition... 9 2.1. Definition of an insurance contract...
More informationIFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance contracts Update on the industry s response. December 2, 2010
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance contracts Update on the industry s response December 2, 2010 Contents Introduction Jacques Tremblay 3 Goal of IFRS Phase 2 Timeline Overview building blocks of the measurement
More informationMr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom (By online submission)
A S C ACCOUNTING STANDARDS COUNCIL SINGAPORE 30 October 2015 Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom (By online submission) Dear Hans RESPONSE TO EXPOSURE
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Issues identified by the EFRAG Board
EFRAG Board meeting 20 September 2018 Paper 08-01 This paper has been prepared by the EFRAG Secretariat for discussion at a public meeting of the EFRAG Board. The paper does not represent the official
More informationOctober 25, Mr. Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
K 333 S. Wabash Ave. Chicago IL 60604 October 25, 2013 D. Craig Mense Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Telephone 312-822-1222 Facsimile 312-822-2004 Internet craig.mense@cna.com Mr.
More information35 Square de Meeûs 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf B-1000 Brussels, Belgium London, UK, E14 4HD. 17 October 2018
Mr. Jean-Paul Gauzes Mr. Hans Hoogervorst EFRAG Board President IASB Board Chair EFRAG IASB 35 Square de Meeûs 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf B-1000 Brussels, Belgium London, UK, E14 4HD 17 Re: Proposed
More informationImplications of Exposure Draft IFRS 4 Phase II and its Implementation
www.pwc.co.uk Implications of Exposure Draft IFRS 4 Phase II and its Implementation Institute of Actuaries of India Conference 17 October 2011 Gautam Kakar Agenda Definition and scope of contracts Measurement
More informationIFRS 17 issues Level of aggregation Draft for discussion
IFRS 17 issues Level of aggregation Draft for discussion 1 Current IASB requirements and TRG conclusions... 1 1.1 IFRS 17 requirements... 1 1.2 TRG... 5 TRG Staff analysis (2018-09 AP10)... 5 TRG Conclusion
More informationGrupo Latinoamericano de Emisores de Normas de Información Financiera
October 25, 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Re: Exposure Draft (ED/2013/7) on Insurance Contracts Dear Board Members, The Group of Latin American
More informationThird Transition Resource Group meeting discussing the implementation of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
October 2018 IFRS in Focus Third Transition Resource Group meeting discussing the implementation of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Contents Topic 1 Insurance risk consequent to an incurred claim Topic 2 Determining
More informationA F E P. Association Française des Entreprises Privées
A F E P Association Française des Entreprises Privées IASB 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH UK Paris, 7 May 2010 Re: ED Measurement of liabilities in IAS 37 We welcome the opportunity to comment on the
More informationThe IASB s Discussion Paper Accounting for dynamic risk management: a portfolio revaluation approach to macro hedging
Date: 15 October 2014 ESMA/2014/1254 Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom The IASB s Discussion Paper Accounting for dynamic risk
More information11 November Dear Mr. Golden:
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: 212 773 3000 www.ey.com Mr. Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, Connecticut
More informationInsurance Contracts Standard
International Financial Reporting Standards Insurance Contracts Standard Subsequent measurement of insurance contracts Darrel Scott IASB member The views expressed in this presentation are those of the
More informationIASB Staff Paper February 2017
IASB Staff Paper February 2017 Effect of board redeliberations on the 2013 Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts About this staff paper This staff paper indicates where and how the proposals in the Exposure
More informationInsurance alert IASB/FASB Board Meetings Insurance Contracts 16-24, 2012
www.pwc.com/insurance Insurance alert IASB/FASB Board Meetings Insurance Contracts May 16-24, 2012 Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at FASB and IASB meetings, and it is often difficult to characterise
More informationProject Summary and Feedback Statement Financial Liabilities
October 2010 Project Summary and Feedback Statement Financial Liabilities Time line 2009 2010 2011 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Part 1: Classification and measurement IFRS 9 Finalisation of Financial Assets ED
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and Level of Aggregation
FRAG Board meeting 6 February 2018 Paper 08-02 This paper has been prepared by the EFRAG Secretariat for discussion at a public meeting of EFRAG TEG. The paper forms part of an early stage of the development
More informationExposure Draft ED 2015/6 Clarifications to IFRS 15
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London United Kingdom EC4M 6XH Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Tel:
More informationED/2012/4 Classification and Measurement: Limited Amendments to IFRS 9
Tony Burke Director, Industry Policy & Strategy AUSTRALIAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION INC. Level 3, 56 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 p. +61 (0)2 8298 0409 f. +61 (0)2 8298 0402 www.bankers.asn.au 19 March 2013
More informationEBF Comment Letter on the IASB Exposure Draft - Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
Chief Executive DM/MT Ref.:EBF_001692 Mr Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: hhoogervorst@ifrs.org Brussels, 5 July
More informationIn depth A look at current financial reporting issues
30 June 2017 No. INT2017-04 What s inside? At a glance..1 Scope. 2 Combination and Separation of Insurance Contracts. 5 Recognition...10 Measurement....12 Measurement of Nonparticipating Contracts..12
More informationFEDERATION BANCAIRE FRANCAISE
FEDERATION BANCAIRE FRANCAISE Banking supervision And Accounting issues Unit The Director Paris, March 281h 2013 Exposure Draft ED/2012/4 Classification and measurement: limited amendments to IFRS 9 Dear
More informationOur Ref.: C/FRSC. Sent electronically through the IASB website ( 19 April 2013
Our Ref.: C/FRSC Sent electronically through the IASB website (www.ifrs.org) 19 April 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sirs, IASB Exposure
More informationAmendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Recognition of the contractual service margin in profit or loss in the general model
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting January 2019 Project Paper topic Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Recognition of the contractual service margin in profit or loss in the general model CONTACT(S) Anne
More informationCONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli +44 (0) Hagit Keren +44 (0)
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting October 2018 Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Concerns and implementation challenges CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli rravelli@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6935 Hagit Keren hkeren@ifrs.org
More informationSAICA MEDICAL SCHEMES PROJECT GROUP SUBMISSION ON EXPOSURE DRAFT ED/2013/7
Ref #445534 25 October 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street LONDON EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: CommentLetters@iasb.org Dear Sir/Madam SAICA MEDICAL SCHEMES PROJECT GROUP SUBMISSION
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and Level of Aggregation A background briefing paper
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and Level of Aggregation A background briefing paper This paper provides an overview of the main provisions in IFRS 17 that relate to the level of aggregation. It uses highly
More informationI am writing on behalf of the Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC) to express our views on the Exposure draft on proposed amendments to IAS 19.
AUTORITE DES NORMES COMPTABLES 3, Boulevard Diderot 75572 PARIS CEDEX 12 Phone 33 1 53 44 52 01 Fax 33 1 53 18 99 43/33 1 53 44 52 33 Internet http://www.anc.gouv.fr Mel jerome.haas@anc.gouv.fr Paris,
More informationIFRS 17 issues Transition Draft for discussion
IFRS 17 issues Transition Draft for discussion 1 Current IASB requirements and TRG conclusions... 1 1.1 IFRS 17 requirements... 1 1.2 Current understanding of the accounting treatment... 6 Selection of
More informationSet forth below you will find our comments to the topics included in the ED.
October 25, 2013 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Board Members: Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera (CINIF), the accounting
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts. SIAS, Salzburg, 5th and 6th of April, 2018 Dr. Johann Kronthaler
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts SIAS, Salzburg, 5th and 6th of April, 2018 Dr. Johann Kronthaler Timeline of IFRS 17 in the context of other standards IFRS 17 is effective for annual periods beginning on or
More informationInsurance Contracts Project Overview
IFRS Foundation Insurance Contracts Project Overview November 2016 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the International Accounting Standards Board
More informationNew on the Horizon: Insurance contracts
IFRS New on the Horizon: Insurance contracts A new world for insurance July 2013 kpmg.com/ifrs Contents A new world for insurance 1 1 The proposals at a glance 2 1.1 Key facts 2 1.2 Key impacts 4 2 Setting
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. 24 November Dear Hans
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 24 November 2015 Dear Hans RE: Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting The Investment Association represents
More informationBACKGROUND BRIEFING PAPER
BACKGROUND BRIEFING PAPER IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS AND TRANSITION March 2018 This paper provides an overview of the main provisions in IFRS 17 that relate to transition. It uses highly simplified examples
More informationComments on the Exposure Draft Hedge Accounting
International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 9 March 2011 Dear Sir or Madame, Comments on the Exposure Draft Hedge Accounting We appreciate the efforts made
More informationIASB education session on 19 May 2015
Insurance alert IASB education session on 19 May 2015 Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at IASB meetings, and it is often difficult to characterise the IASB's tentative conclusions, these summaries
More informationDiscussion Paper - Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation Approach to Macro Hedging
THE CHAIRPERSON Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 16 October 2014 Discussion Paper - Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio
More informationThe ANC welcomes the addition of a detailed illustrative example dealing with this issue.
AUTORITE DES NORMES COMPTABLES 5, PLACE DES VINS DE FRANCE 75573 PARIS CÉDEX 12 Phone 33 1 53 44 28 56 Internet http://www.anc.gouv.fr/ Paris, 5 th december 2014 N 40 M. Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman I.A.S.B.
More informationDraft Comment Letter
Draft Comment Letter Comments should be submitted by 28 November 2014 to commentletters@efrag.org 12 September 2014 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
More informationPAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/7- CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
20 November 2015 IFRS Foundation 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: commentletters@ifrs.org Dear Sir/Madam PAAB SUBMISSION ON ED 2015/07 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
More informationHeads Up. One Model, Two Models, Red Model, Blue Model FASB Issues Exposure Draft on Insurance Contracts. In This Issue: Scope
August 6, 2013 Volume 20, Issue 25 Heads Up In This Issue: Scope Overview of the Measurement Models Unit of Account Unbundling Reinsurance Insurance Revenue Presentation and Disclosure Transition Appendix
More informationIASB Update. Welcome to IASB Update. Amortised cost and impairment. July Contact us
IASB Update From the International Accounting Standards Board July 2010 Welcome to IASB Update This IASB Update is a staff summary of the tentative decisions reached by the Board at a public meeting. As
More informationUsing Solvency II to implement IFRS 17
www.pwc.co.uk 4 Using Solvency II to implement IFRS 17 September 2017 How can you make the best use of existing Solvency II systems and processes to ensure as smooth and efficient a transition to IFRS
More informationComments on the Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
June 30, 2010 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madame, Comments on the Exposure Draft Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment
More informationNEW EXPOSURE DRAFT IFRS 4 - PHASE , Novembre 7
NEW EXPOSURE DRAFT IFRS 4 - PHASE 2 2013, Novembre 7 OVERVIEW 1. Background to the project 2. Key points of the new ED and their impact 3. Conclusion 2 01 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT 3 BACKGROUND The insurance
More informationReference: IASB Exposure Draft Fair Value Option for Financial Liabilities
CEIOPS Westhafen Tower, 14 floor, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Contact: Carlos
More informationExposure Draft ED/2009/4 Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement, Proposed amendments to IFRIC 14
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7583 8517 www.deloitte.com Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards
More informationInsurance Contracts Presentation of insurance contracts on the statement of financial position
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting December 2018 Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Presentation of insurance contracts on the statement of financial position CONTACT(S) Caroline Federer cfederer@ifrs.org +44
More informationDiscussion Paper Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity
5 September 2008 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street, London EC4M BXH United Kingdom Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ United Kingdom t + 44 (0) 20 7382 1770 f + 44 (0)
More informationTITLE. Presentation Points Convergence in Financial. Additional Points Additional Points. Reporting
TITLE Presentation Points Convergence in Financial Additional Points Additional Points Reporting Discussion Topics Convergence in financial reporting: Update on insurance contracts project Issues from
More informationProposed Accounting Standards Update, Financial Instruments Credit Losses (Subtopic )
Tel +44 (0)20 7694 8871 8 Salisbury Square Fax +44 (0)20 7694 8429 London EC4Y 8BB mark.vaessen@kpmgifrg.com United Kingdom Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon
More informationANNEX 3 Issues arising from the application of IAS/IFRS in the light of prudential supervision
ANNEX 3 Issues arising from the application of IAS/IFRS in the light of prudential supervision 1 - Definition of an Insurance Contract (IFRS 4) IFRS 4 defines an insurance contract as a contract under
More informationComments should be submitted by 2 March 2011 to
Comments should be submitted by 2 March 2011 to Commentletters@efrag.org [XX March 2011] International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir / Madam Re: Exposure
More informationRe: Comments on Discussion Paper Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation Approach to Macro Hedging
The International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom 23 October 2014 Re: Comments on Discussion Paper Accounting for Dynamic Risk Management: a Portfolio Revaluation
More informationEBF preliminary views on the IASB ED IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement
EBF ref. D1386E Brussels, 27 August 2009 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The EBF
More informationOverview of IFRS17. David Burton
Overview of IFRS17 David Burton 12 September 2017 Agenda An overview of IFRS 17 Building Block Approach Premium Allocation Approach Contracts with participating features Implementation Agenda An overview
More informationInternational Accounting Standard 19. Employee Benefits
International Accounting Standard 19 Employee Benefits CONTENTS BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS ON IAS 19 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BACKGROUND SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO IAS 19 SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO E54 DEFINITIONS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION
More informationIFRS 4 Phase 2 Exposure Draft. 15 January 2014
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Exposure Draft 15 January 2014 Agenda Background Key areas of the proposal Worked examples Comparison with Solvency II Questions Disclaimer: The material, content and views in the following
More information