Insurance contracts. Agenda. Overview of IASB and FASB s proposals on insurance. Presenters/Administrative. Overview of proposals.
|
|
- Robyn Turner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Insurance contracts Overview of IASB and FASB s proposals on insurance 28 June 2013 KPMG International Standards Group Agenda 1 2 Presenters/Administrative Overview of proposals 1. Background and overview 2. Scope 3. Separating non-insurance components 4. Recognition 5. Measurement models 6. Reinsurance 7. Business combinations and portfolio transfers 8. Presentation 9. Disclosures 10.Transition 3 4 Business Impacts Q&A 2 1
2 Presenters Darryl Briley Vice-Chair KPMG Global Insurance Contracts Topic Team Partner US DPP Jennifer Austin Partner US DPP Neil Parkinson Canadian Member - KPMG Global Insurance Contracts Topic Team Canadian Insurance Sector Leader 3 Administrative CPE regulations require that online participants take part in online questions Must respond to a minimum of four questions per 50 minutes for today s webcast, you must answer 7 CPE questions to receive credit. Polling questions will appear on your media player, and will be pushed out silently during today s presentation Results will be reviewed in the aggregate; no responses will be tracked back to any individual or organization Do not view the presentation on slide show mode polling questions will not appear To ask a question, use the Ask a Question icon on your media player. Help Desk: or outside the United States at
3 Insurance contracts project milestones IASB Exposure Draft FASB Discussion Paper rations Joint delibe IASB Targeted Re- Exposure Draft FASB Exposure Draft Redelibera ations IASB final standard? FASB final standard? Prepare for transition Effective dates? to 1Q 2013 June H 2013 to 2014 late 2014 or early 2015? 2015 Jan 2015 IFRS 9 Effective date Jan 2017 earliest effective date Jan 2018 Potential effective date The effective date of the final IFRS standard will be approximately three years after the standard is issued. The IASB staff currently estimate that the issuance date will be late 2014 to early The IASB has stated that it expects the earliest possible effective date to be for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January The FASB decided not to include a minimum time period between the issuance of the standard and the effective date in its ED, but rather to ask a question about the key drivers affecting the timing of implementation. 5 Background and overview Major changes since the 2010 proposals IASB Re-exposure will include full text of proposed standard Limited questions to avoid re-opening of issues Measurement proposals IASB does not intend to revisit Treatment of other aspects of proposed standard after re-exposure IASB intends to undertake fieldwork during re-exposure contractual service margin (unlocking- IASB only) Treatment of participating contracts FASB will have a full exposure draft FASB intends to undertake fieldwork during the exposure period The comment period for the exposure drafts will end 25 October Presentation proposals Presentation of premiums, claims and expenses in profit & loss Presentation of changes in discount rate in OCI Approach to transition Retrospective application if practical Estimate of margin on transition 6 3
4 Background and overview Key changes to 2010 proposals Areas with significant changes Areas with significant clarifications Scope of financial guarantees Future cash flows Unbundling Recognition Contract boundaries Acquisition costs Premium-allocation approach (PAA) Contractual service margin(iasb)/single margin(fasb) Participating contracts Reinsurance Use of OCI Presentation of statement of comprehensive income Transition Discount rate Risk adjustment Investment contracts with a discretionary participation feature (DPF) Presentation of statement of financial position Premium-allocation approach (PAA) Disclosures 7 Background and overview Key IASB and FASB differences Scope - Investment contracts with DPF Scope - Financial guarantee insurance (including mortgage) Building block approach (BBA) 3 vs. 4 building blocks Definition of a portfolio, unit of account for releasing margins Acquisition costs successful vs. unsuccessful Mechanics for contract cash flows that vary with underlying items Unlocking the residual margin vs. Locked in single margin Premium allocation approach permit vs. require Reinsurance approach BBA vs. PAA permit vs. require Transition- practical expedients and re-designation of financial assets 8 4
5 Scope In Scope Out of Scope Contracts that an entity issues that transfer significant insurance risk, including: Contracts that an entity issues that do not transfer significant insurance risk, including: Financial Instruments issued by insurers Containing DPFs # Financial Instruments Without DPFs Service Contracts Financial Guarantee Contracts* Financial Guarantee Contracts* Contracts specifically excluded, e.g. certain fixed fee service contracts that t are currently accounted for as insurance contracts # not t currently accounted for as insurance contracts # *The FASB has decided on specific exceptions to the inclusion of financial guarantee contracts in the insurance contracts standard. #IASB only 9 Scope exceptions The proposals would apply to all insurance contracts except: Product warranties issued directly by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer; Residual value guarantees provided by a manufacturer, dealer or retailer, as well as lessee s residual value guarantee embedded in a finance lease; Employers assets and liabilities under employee benefit plans and retirement benefit obligations reported by defined benefit retirement plans; Contractual rights or contractual obligations that are contingent on future use of, or right to use, a non-financial item; Contingent consideration payable or receivable in a business combination; Direct insurance contracts that an entity holds, i.e. direct insurance contracts in which an entity is the policyholder. Does not apply to a reinsurance contract that an insurer holds; Fixed-fee service contracts that have as their primary purpose p the provision of services and meet certain criteria's below; Contracts are not priced based on an assessment of risk with individual customer Contracts typically compensate customers by providing a service rather than cash The type of risk transferred are primarily related the use (or frequency) of services 10 5
6 Separating non-insurance components The separation of certain components from an insurance contract ( unbundling ) would be required. Unbundling gprohibited if not required. Guidance on closely related embedded derivatives, distinct investment components and distinct goods and services is provided Insurance component Distinct goods and services Embedded derivatives (not closely related) Distinct investment components Non-distinct investment component Measured under the insurance standard Measured under the insurance standard, but excluded from the aggregate premium Measured under the financial instrument standard Measured under the revenue recognition standard 11 Recognition An insurance contract would be recognized from the earliest of: the beginning of the coverage period; the date on which the first payment from the policyholder becomes due #; and if applicable, the date on which facts and circumstances indicate that the portfolio of insurance contracts to which the contract belongs is onerous. In the absence of a contractual due date, the first payment from the policyholder would be deemed to be due once it has been received. Onerous contract Recognize consideration Bound by terms of Coverage begins = contract premium due 1 November 1 January # IASB only 12 6
7 Proposed measurement models The building-block model Four building blocks IASB preference Three building blocks FASB preference Expected future cash flows Explicit, unbiased and probability-weighted estimates of future cash outflows less future cash inflows Time value of money Discounted using current rates to reflect the time value of money Risk adjustment To adjust for the effects of uncertainty about the amount and timing of future cash flows Contractual service margin To remove any profit at inception. Released over coverage period. Interest accreted on the contractual service margin. Single margin To remove any profit at inception. Released over coverage and claims handling period. Interest accreted on the single margin. 13 Proposed measurement models Fundamentals Level of measurement An insurer would measure the present value of the fulfilment cash flows excluding the risk adjustment at the portfolio level of aggregation for insurance contracts. No level of measurement prescribed for the risk adjustment. Portfolio IASB - contracts that are subject to similar risks and priced similarly relative to the risk taken on and managed together as a single pool. FASB - contracts that are subject to similar risks and priced similarly relative to the risk taken on and have a similar duration and similar expected patterns of release of the single margin. Margins IASB- unit of account used to determine the contractual service margin should be at portfolio level. l Unit of account used to release not prescribed but consistent t with the objective of release. FASB- unit of account to determine and release the single margin is at portfolio level. 14 7
8 Proposed measurement models Building block 1 Cash flows Estimates of cash flows would include all cash inflows and outflows related directly to the fulfilment of the portfolio of contracts the contract belongs to and would: Be explicit (i.e. separate from estimates of discount rates that adjust for the time value of money and the risk adjustment) Reflect the perspective of the entity (market variables would be consistent with observable market prices) Incorporate, in an unbiased way, all available information that relates to the cash flows of the contract Be current and consistent with market prices, i.e. use of estimates of financial market variables such as interest rates Include only cash flows arising from existing contracts within the contracts boundaries Estimates of cash flows would be updated each reporting period and measured at a portfolio level of aggregation for insurance contracts. Insurance liability under the building block approach and the onerous contract liability under premium allocation approach reflects estimates of cash flows at the reporting date. 15 Proposed measurement models Building block 1 Acquisition costs Acquisition costs to be included in the initial measurement of a portfolio of insurance contracts should be all the direct costs that the insurer will incur in acquiring the contracts in the portfolio. Acquisition costs incurred before a contract s coverage period begins should be recognized as part of the insurance contracts liability for the portfolio of contracts. Measurement would exclude indirect costs including: rent and occupancy software dedicated to contract acquisition equipment maintenance and depreciation agent and sales staff recruiting and training administration advertising utilities other general overhead FASB only - limited to those costs related to successful acquisition efforts IASB only - no distinction between successful and unsuccessful efforts (all direct costs included) FASB lines up with current U.S. GAAP other than eliminating direct response advertising and the transition expedient in ASU
9 Proposed measurement models Building block 2 Time value of money Example bottom-up and top-down approach Financial instrument yield of 5.25% (based on actual assets held or a reference portfolio) Either a top-down or a bottom-up approach may be used to determine an appropriate discount rate. In theory, both approaches should result in the same discount rate, however in practice, differences are expected. The top-down approach may result in a higher rate, as illustrated. Top-down approach: 3.75% Bottom-up approach: 3.50% Market risk premium expected losses (1%) Market risk premium for unexpected losses (.5%) Difference between top-down and bottom up approach (.25%) Liquidity premium (.5%) Risk-free rate 3% No specific method prescribed. Regardless of the approach used, the discount rate should be consistent with the characteristics of the insurance contract liability, e.g. timing, currency and liquidity. 17 Proposed measurement models Building block 2 Use of OCI to present changes in discount rates Present in OCI Cumulative OCI Difference between liability discounted at the current rate and the liability discounted at the (locked-in) rate at inception Present in profit or loss Interest expense at locked-in rate Current period OCI Equals interest expense at current rate less interest expense at locked-in rate Changes in interest sensitive cash flow assumptions (e.g. minimum interest guarantees and lapse rates) (a) Note: (a)unless offset against an unlocked contractual service margin Key attributes The use of OCI to present the effect of discount rate changes would be required (rather than permitted) No loss recognition test To recognise the effect of changes in cash flow assumptions in profit or loss using the locked-in rate 18 9
10 Proposed measurement models Building block 2 interaction with the financial instruments proposals Business model assessment Amortized Cost FV-OCI FV-Profit or Loss Held and managed within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows Held within a business model whose objective is both to hold the assets to collect contractual cash flows and to sell the assets Residual category (i.e., all other assets and includes assets that do not meet the SPPI test as well as those that are held for sale) 19 Proposed measurement models Building block 3 Risk adjustment (IASB only) If there are techniques that could represent faithfully the risk inherent in the insurance obligations, then the Risk inclusion Adjustment: of an explicit The risk compensation adjustment would the insurer provide requires relevant for information bearing to the users. uncertainty Under the about IASB s the amount approach, and the timing measurement of the cash of an flows insurance that arise contract as the should entity contain fulfils an the explicit insurance risk adjustment. contract IASB has not prescribed a unit of account for measurement of the risk adjustment. If there are techniques that could represent faithfully the risk inherent in the insurance obligations, then the inclusion of an explicit risk adjustment would provide relevant information to users. Under the IASB s approach, the measurement of an insurance contract should contain an explicit risk adjustment. IASB has not prescribed a unit of account for measurement of the risk adjustment. The IASB would not limit the range of available techniques and related inputs to the risk adjustment. However, if a technique other than confidence level is used, that technique and the equivalent confidence level % is to be disclosed. Re-measured each reporting gperiod and changes are recognized in profit or loss. Replicating asset approach based on the fair value of the replicating asset may be appropriate. Level of measurement is not prescribed as long as measurement meets objective
11 Proposed measurement models Building block 4 Contractual service margin (IASB only) Contractual service margin (IASB) Single margin (FASB) Arises when the present value of the fulfilment cash flows * is less than zero (i.e. remove day-one gains) If the present value of fulfilment cash flows is positive, recognise a loss in profit or loss at inception Prospectively adjusted for changes in the estimates of cash flows relating to future coverage or other future services; cannot become negative in subsequent measurement (unlocking) Systematic release over coverage period based on the pattern of transfer of services provided Classified as part of the insurance liability Interest accretion using discount rate at inception The single margin would not be re-measured subsequently (no unlocking) Recognises profit as the entity satisfies its performance obligation to the policyholder (i.e. released from exposure to risk as evidenced by a reduction in the variability of cash outflows) Separate presentation in statement of financial position Interest accretion using discount rate at inception * defined as the expected present value of the future cash outflows less cash inflows plus risk adjustment 21 Proposed measurement models The mirroring exception The measurement for these contracts can be illustrated as follows: Contracts that specify a link to underlying items that the entity is required to hold Cash flows vary directly with underlying items Cash flows vary indirectly with underlying items Cash flows do not vary with underlying items Measurement: mirrors underlying items, i.e. Amortized cost, FVTPL, FVOCI Measurement: risk-adjusted expected present value of cash flows Contracts that do not specify a link to underlying items that an entity is required to hold (i.e. universal life, index-linked products or other types of contracts in which the participation p features are discretionary) would be measured under the building-block approach. FASB: The mirroring exception would not apply to situations in which 1) the policyholder s participation is determined on a basis other than that used to measure the underlying item in the GAAP F/S and does not reflect a timing difference or 2) cash flows for which the entity has the discretion on the amounts relating to the policyholder participation. Additionally, when an entity expects changes to the crediting rates, reset rates in a manner that recognises changes in estimated interest crediting and related ultimate cash flows on a level-yield basis over the life of the contract
12 Proposed measurement models The premium-allocation approach Simplified measurement approach for some short-duration contracts and similar approach to current practices for non-life contracts. Consistent with revenue recognition proposals. Intended to be proxy for building blocks and permitted (IASB only), if: the coverage period at initial recognition is one year or less; or Produces measurements that are a reasonable approximation to those of the BBA i.e. at inception, the entity expects no significant variability in the fulfilment cash flows. PAA Onerous contract liability measured under BBA, if applicable Liability for incurred claims measured under the BBA Liability for the remaining coverage, measured by reference to unearned premium BBA All three components measured under one approach FASB: PAA would be required, if the insurance contract is one year or less; or it is unlikely that there will be significant variability in the expected value of net cash flows required to fulfil a contract before a claim is incurred. 23 Proposed measurement models The premium-allocation approach Initial measurement- Liability for remaining coverage Pre claims liability at inception = Initial premium Directly attributable - acquisition costs - Onerous contract liability Similar in many ways to current practice for non-life contracts Discounting required if there is a significant financing component using discount rate at inception Directly attributable acquisition costs can be expensed if coverage period is less than 1 year Released on a systematic basis representing the transfer of services Onerous contract test when facts and circumstances indicate it might be onerous Subsequent measurement- Liability for remaining coverage Previous carrying amount + Interest accretion + Premium received in period Revenue recognized for coverage - - Change in onerous contract liability 24 12
13 Proposed measurement models The premium-allocation approach Liability for claims incurred under the PAA is measured at the fulfilment cash flows Risk Fulfilment cash flows Unbiased probability-weighted current estimates of future cash flows Discounted at current rates to reflect the time value of money adjustment (IASB only) When a liability for incurred claims is discounted - use the discount rate at the inception of the contract to determine the amount of the claims and interest expense in profit and loss. Discounting not needed if cash flows are expected to be paid or received in one year less 25 Reinsurance Reinsurance assumed Evaluate the applicable approach in same manner as a direct contract IASB -Permit Eligibility Principle * Contracts eligible if the PAA would produce measurements that are a reasonable approximation of buildingblock approach. * A contract would qualify automatically under both approaches if coverage period is one year of less FASB - Require Eligibility Criteria * Apply the BBA rather than the PAA if at contract inception: it is likely that there will be significant variability in the expected value of net cash flows required to fulfil a contract before a claim is incurred
14 Reinsurance Reinsurance ceded Premium allocation approach (PAA) Building block approach (BBA) Direct contract Reinsurance ceded FASB requires symmetrical approach Reinsurance ceded PAA permitted if proxy for BBA Reinsurance ceded (BBA) IASB allows for either approach regardless of direct contract 27 Reinsurance Reinsurance ceded example Measurement example for BBA at initial recognition Present value of fulfilment cash flows > Zero Present value of fulfilment cash flows < Zero Input Measurement Input Measurement Reinsurance premium paid (premium ceded Reinsurance premium paid (premium ceded to (70) to reinsurer lump sum paid up-front) reinsurer lump sum paid up-front) (100) Ceding commission received 7 Ceding commission received 7 Reinsurance recoverable cash inflows (after allowance for expected credit losses) 80 Reinsurance recoverable cash inflows (after allowance for expected credit losses) 80 Discounting (15) Discounting (15) Risk adjustment 10 Risk adjustment 10 Contractual service margin/liability (12) Expense at inception 1 ; or (Debit) contractual service margin/asset Loss at inception when the coverage period is for past events, i.e. retroactive reinsurance. 2. Reinsurance asset, such as prepaid premium, when the reinsurance contract is for future events. FASB: No risk adjustment would be included; the remaining single margin on reinsurance contracts that provide coverage for future events would be recognized consistently with the margin on underlying contracts covered by the contract 28 14
15 Business combinations and portfolio transfers Recognition Contracts acquired in a business combination or portfolio transfer would be recognized at the date of the business combination or portfolio transfer Measurement The consideration received for insurance contracts acquired would be treated as a pre-coverage cash flow. An entity would determine the expected present value of the fulfillment cash flows and compare that amount with the consideration received for those contracts, after adjusting the consideration for any other assets and liabilities acquired in the same transaction Business combinations Portfolio transfers Consideration received > PVFC Recognize the difference as contractual service margin Recognize the difference as contractual service margin PVFC > consideration received Recognize the difference as an adjustment to the initial measurement of a gain or goodwill # Recognize the difference as a loss # FASB: Difference would be recognized as a loss 29 Presentation Statement of financial position An entity would present separately: portfolios of insurance contracts that are in an asset position; and portfolios of insurance contracts t that t are in a liability position Reinsurance contract assets from insurance contract liabilities General IAS 1 presentation requirements would apply FASB proposals also include separate presentation of: building-block and premium-allocation approaches further disaggregation of insurance contract assets and liabilities separate presentation of any unconditional right to premiums BBA - premium receivable and single margin (includes acquisition costs expected to be paid) PAA - premium receivable and liability for remaining coverage 30 15
16 Presentation Presentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI Initial recognition: Expected cash inflows Building block 1 Building block 2 Building block 3 # Building block 4 Expected cash outflows Discounting Risk adjustment Presentation of changes in profit or loss and OCI (# IASB only): Contractual service (or single) margin Recognized in profit or loss if no contractual service margin zero Changes in cash flows unrelated to services: profit or loss Changes in cash flows related to past and current services: profit or loss Unwind of locked- in discount rate: profit or loss Changes in discount rate: OCI Changes in risk adjustment: profit or loss # Release of margin: profit or loss Offset changes related to future services # Changes in cash flows related to future services: Offset against the margin * # 31 Presentation Presentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI Present of profit or loss and OCI IAS 1 applies: presentation of revenue, claims incurred, interest based on locked-in discount rate FASB requires disaggregation of PAA and BBA, ceded balances, and interest accretion Mirroring exception to presentation of changes Mirrored cash flows align with underlying item All changes in value of cash flows that vary indirectly with underlying items presented in profit or loss Discount rate used to measure interest expense in profit or loss is updated when the entity expects changes in returns on underlying items to affect the amount of cash flows to the policyholder. That rate is either at contract inception or when the rate is updated (IASB only) When an entity expects changes to the crediting rates, reset in a manner that recognizes changes in estimated interest crediting and related ultimate cash flows on a level-yield basis over the life of the contract. (FASB only) 32 16
17 Presentation Presentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI Insurance contract revenue Premiums are allocated to periods in proportion to the value of coverage (and other services) by reference to the estimated pattern of expected claims and expenses. Allocated premiums exclude the present value of the amounts to be paid to policyholders regardless of whether an insured event occurs ( the investment component ) Earned premium presentation (an example) Insurance contract revenue 475 Claims and benefits incurred -320 Expenses incurred -60 Amortisation of acquisition costs -20 Changes in estimates of future cash flows (if not offset against the contractual service margin) -10 Unwind of previous changes in estimates 5 Underwriting result (Gross margin) 70 Investment income 60 Interest on insurance liability -54 Profit or loss 76 Other comprehensive income: Change in insurance contract liability due to changes in discount rate 9 Fair value movements on FVOCI assets -10 Total comprehensive income Presentation Presentation of the statement of profit or loss and OCI Simplified example of insurance contract revenue presentation Assumptions Portfolio of 2-year contracts incepted at the beginning of period 1 Time value of money immaterial No investment component, acquisition costs, expenses, changes in estimates or experience adjustments, losses on initial recognition All claims and benefits paid immediately Expected cash flows, risk adjustment and margin release pattern as presented in table to the right Expected cash flows Year 1 Year 2 Premiums received Expected claims and benefits Fulfillment cash flows Release of risk adjustment (IASB only) Release of contractual service margin/single margin Presentation Year 1 Year 2 Insurance contract revenue* Actual claims and benefits (amounts incurred) Underwriting margin * Insurance contract revenue is the sum of expected claims and benefits, change in risk adjustment and release of contractual service margin/single margins 34 17
18 Disclosures New disclosures Additional disclosure requirements include: Amounts recognized in financial statements Significant judgements Nature and extent of risks Additional reconciliations as a result of the new measurement model in tabular format, including components of changes. Reconciliation from premiums received to revenue. Inputs used to determine revenue recognized in the period Effect of the insurance contracts initially recognized in the period. Additional transition disclosures. More detailed disclosures of methods and processes for estimating inputs. Effect of changes in the methods and inputs, including explanations for the reasons for changes. Disclosure of confidence level to which the risk adjustment corresponds. Disclosure of the yield curve used to discount cash flows that do not depend on returns from underlying items. Quantitative information about effect on profit or loss and equity of contracts sensitivities to insurance risk. Reconciliation of disclosures about claims development with the carrying amounts of the insurance liabilities. For liquidity risk, the amounts payable on demand, in a way that highlights the relationship between these amounts and the carrying amounts of the related contracts. 35 Transition Overview Retrospective application Limited ability to redesignate some financial assets Includes margin for in-force contracts at Re-designations under the fair value date of transition option permitted to eliminate or significantly reduce accounting Full retrospective application mismatches Practical expedients provided for determination of contractual service/single margins and discount rate if retrospective application is impracticable Additional guidance for determining locked-in discount rate to adjust AOCI at date of inception and subsequent interest expense in profit or loss if cant be determined retrospectively Election of OCI category for investments in certain equity instruments permitted FASB proposals would allow financial assets that relate to insurance business to be re-designated under the relevant financial instruments guidance in effect as if the insurer had adopted that guidance on transition. Early adoption permitted (IASB only) 36 18
19 Transition Estimating the contractual service margin at transition What practical expedient would be used to determine the contractual service/single margin? Estimate what the margin would have been if the insurer had been able to apply the new standard retrospectively. When retrospective application is impracticable, an insurer would estimate the contractual service margin by maximizing the use of objective data, i.e. an insurer would not calibrate the residual margin to the insurance liability as it was measured using previous GAAP. (IASB only) An insurer would determine the contractual service margin on transition assuming all changes in estimates of cash flows between initial recognition and the beginning of the earliest period presented were known at initial recognition. (IASB only) If no objective information to retrospectively adopt, estimate margin to zero (FASB only) Practical expedient to determine the margin based on an insurer s existing definition of a portfolio and allocate that margin to the new portfolios on transition (FASB only). What discount rate would be used? The discount rate used is a key determinant of the margin established at transition and amounts would be recognized in OCI and the interest expense recorded in profit or loss. Insurers may find it difficult to determine the discount rate in the retrospective period using either the top-down or bottom-up approaches. Practical expedient when determining the discount rate would otherwise be impracticable for contracts written prior to transition. 37 Business impacts How will the proposals affect your organization? Operational performance People and processes Product design and pricing and asset- liability management Data and systems Possible volatility in equity and profit or loss Capital management 38 19
20 Business impacts Changes to asset liability management Increased volatility possible in profit or loss and equity Impacts on asset-liability management and financial instruments accounting Volatility may increase because current information and assumptions would be used in measuring insurance liabilities. Applying the new financial instruments proposals may mitigate or increase volatility. The degree of volatility would depend on how insurance liabilities and financial assets are measured under current and proposed requirements. Discounting insurance liabilities would be a big change for many property and casualty insurers. Effective date of financial instrument proposals may precede effective date of the insurance proposals. Interaction with future financial instruments models may impact investment allocations and assetliability management. Entities would have limited ability to redesignate some financial assets on initial application. Accounting mismatches may result if: changes in conditions have offsetting effects on the economic values of assets and liabilities; but gains and losses are not recognized symmetrically. 39 Business impacts Changes to operating performance Measurement and reporting of operational performance Proposed measurement model changes how insurance liabilities are presented and consequently operating performance. Presentation and disclosure proposals are expected to change the communication of performance because: performance metrics would be less familiar; multi-line business may be more complex to explain; reporting processes may take longer; non-gaap measures may be used to explain financial performance; and IFRS vs. US GAAP differences may need to be considered. Broad business impacts May change decisions on product profile and features, or product pricing. Growing businesses may see negative impact on results if earnings patterns become more back-ended on long duration contracts. More volatile products may become less desirable e.g. long-duration insurance products with guarantees. New reporting basis may have tax implications in some jurisdictions. Capital management and interaction with regulatory capital requirements in some jurisdictions Increased volatility in reported equity may impact capital positions. Insurers would need to incorporate accounting change into planning for solvency and regulatory reporting. Analysts, investors and shareholders may need time to understand the new reporting
21 Business impacts People impacts Significant impacts on people Compensation arrangements and performance targets may be changed. Additional resources may be needed to manage transition. Actuarial and accounting resources will be in high demand. IT resources will be needed to address changing actuarial valuations and systems developments. Some resource gaps may be addressed by additional hiring, outsourcing to third parties, internal training, and redeploying existing resources within the organization. 41 Next steps Insurance Contracts Accounting, tax and reporting Perform a comprehensive review of insurance contracts to assess how they would be measured under the BBA or PAA. Consider how best to communicate performance, due to less familiar performance metrics and presentation and duration of reporting processes. Evaluate need to supplement disclosures and use non-gaap measures. Assess possible alignment with solvency and regulatory reporting. Identify magnitude of any impact on regulatory capital requirements. Assess impact on the taxation treatment of insurance contracts. Identify sources contributing to volatility of financial results under new model. Assess interaction with application of financial instruments proposals and identify possible accounting mismatches. Identify possible impacts arising from the revenue recognition proposals e.g. for unbundling components of unit-linked contracts. Assess impacts on separate entity reporting. Update accounting and reporting manuals
22 Next steps Insurance Contracts Systems and processes Upgrade accounting systems to ensure that they can handle new requirements. Upgrade actuarial modeling capabilities, and valuation and financial reporting systems. Evaluate data collection needs and co-ordinate significant actuarial and finance involvement. Identify processes affected by the proposals and establish processes for: evaluating contract classification and unbundling requirements; calculating insurance contract liabilities, including determining the discount rate, risk adjustment and contractual service margin; and disclosures. Evaluate changes needed to key internal controls over financial and regulatory reporting. Consider the need to outsource processes. Consider implementation of revised IT strategy. Develop a transition plan for parallel runs and dual reporting. 43 Next steps Insurance Contracts Business Review product profile and consider changes to product design and pricing. Revisit investment allocations and asset-liability management. Consider entering into reinsurance and outsourcing arrangements. Assess impacts on key performance metrics. Budget for necessary changes to people, processes and systems. Assess impact on general business issues such as contractual terms, treasury practices, and risk management practices
23 Next steps Insurance Contracts People and change Determine staff needs in particular, actuarial, IT and finance resources. Train finance and actuarial teams, as well as IT, underwriting, risk management and investor relations. Evaluate impact on compensation arrangements and performance targets and measures. Communicate changes for stakeholders to understand new metrics and performance results. Assess how changes to processes may impact how work is performed in particular, for actuaries and risk managers. 45 Questions? 46 23
24 kpmg.com/socialmedia 2013 KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. The KPMG name, logo and cutting through complexity are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. 24
IFRS 17. New Accounting Perspective. KPMG Advisory (China) November 2017
IFRS 17 New Accounting Perspective KPMG Advisory (China) November 2017 Background & overview Background & overview Milestones 2001 IFRS4: IASB initiation 2004 IFRS4: release 2010 IFRS 4 Phase II: 1 st
More informationNew on the Horizon: Insurance contracts
IFRS New on the Horizon: Insurance contracts A new world for insurance July 2013 kpmg.com/ifrs Contents A new world for insurance 1 1 The proposals at a glance 2 1.1 Key facts 2 1.2 Key impacts 4 2 Setting
More informationIFRS 17: Insurance Contracts
IFRS 17: Insurance Contracts Transition from IFRS 4 to IFRS 17 Presentation by: Alex Mbai Partner, KPMG East Africa ambai@kpmg.co.ke, +254 729 406 468/9 ICPAK Tuesday, 11 th September 2018 Uphold public
More informationIASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts
IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts 23 September 2010 KUALA LUMPUR IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts Jeremy Hoon 23 September 2010 KPMG LLP, SINGAPORE OECD Bank Negara Malaysia OECD-Asia Regional
More informationIASB Staff Paper February 2017
IASB Staff Paper February 2017 Effect of board redeliberations on the 2013 Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts About this staff paper This staff paper indicates where and how the proposals in the Exposure
More informationImplications of Exposure Draft IFRS 4 Phase II and its Implementation
www.pwc.co.uk Implications of Exposure Draft IFRS 4 Phase II and its Implementation Institute of Actuaries of India Conference 17 October 2011 Gautam Kakar Agenda Definition and scope of contracts Measurement
More informationThe future of insurance accounting preparing for change
www.pwc.com The future of insurance accounting preparing for change 13 Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Asia Conference Chris Hancorn, Director, Hong Kong Agenda 1. Where are we now? 2. Technical update
More informationIFRS 17 - Brief overview. Fall School November 2017
IFRS 17 - Brief overview Fall School 10-11 November 2017 IFRS17 Intro IFRS today IFRS 17 brief overview 1. Scope 2. Level of aggregation 3. Fulfilment CFs 4. CSM/BBA/VFA 5. PAA 6. Presentation 7. Transition
More informationIFRS 4 Phase 2 Exposure Draft. 15 January 2014
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Exposure Draft 15 January 2014 Agenda Background Key areas of the proposal Worked examples Comparison with Solvency II Questions Disclaimer: The material, content and views in the following
More informationPractical guide to IFRS 23 August 2010
Practical guide to IFRS 23 August 2010 Insurance contracts Fundamental accounting changes proposed At a glance The IASB ( the board ) released an exposure draft on 30 July 2010 proposing a comprehensive
More informationOverview of IFRS17. David Burton
Overview of IFRS17 David Burton 12 September 2017 Agenda An overview of IFRS 17 Building Block Approach Premium Allocation Approach Contracts with participating features Implementation Agenda An overview
More informationHeads Up. One Model, Two Models, Red Model, Blue Model FASB Issues Exposure Draft on Insurance Contracts. In This Issue: Scope
August 6, 2013 Volume 20, Issue 25 Heads Up In This Issue: Scope Overview of the Measurement Models Unit of Account Unbundling Reinsurance Insurance Revenue Presentation and Disclosure Transition Appendix
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Update Life
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Update Life Actuaries Clubs of Boston & Harford/Springfield Joint Meeting 2011 November 17, 2011 Albert Li Agenda Insurance Contract Objective and Timeline
More informationfinancia fin ancia REporting changes chan
financial REporting changes 2012 and beyond Agenda 1. IFRS today how did the adoption of IFRS impact the insurance industry? 2. Developments in IFRS Standards 2012 and Beyond more changes coming 3. Standards
More informationFASB / IASB Insurance Contracts Project Update Webinar
FASB / IASB Insurance Contracts Project Update Webinar November 1, 2012 International Accounting Standards Task Force Insurance Contracts Project Update 1 Presenters Noel Harewood, MAAA, FSA; Member, International
More informationInsurance alert. also decided that acquisition costs should be presented as part of the margin liability rather than as an asset and that,
www.pwc.com/insurance Insurance alert IASB/FASB Board Meetings and Education Sessions, October 11 and 15-19, 2012 PwC summary of meetings: Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at FASB and IASB meetings,
More informationIFRS Phase II Accounting Issues
IFRS Phase II Accounting Issues Session 22 2012 CIA Annual Conference Neil Parkinson, FCA Toronto, June 21, 2012 Our agenda 1. IFRS adoption in 2011 what changed and what didn t 2. Future IFRS changes
More informationThe Actuarial Society of Hong Kong IFRS Insurance Contract Phase II Development
The Actuarial Society of Hong Kong IFRS Insurance Contract Phase II Development Jin Peng, PwC 6 November 2013 Agenda Introduction to 2013 Exposure Draft Key Industry Feedback Worldwide Feedback 2 Introduction
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts. SIAS, Salzburg, 5th and 6th of April, 2018 Dr. Johann Kronthaler
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts SIAS, Salzburg, 5th and 6th of April, 2018 Dr. Johann Kronthaler Timeline of IFRS 17 in the context of other standards IFRS 17 is effective for annual periods beginning on or
More informationAn overview of IFRS 17
IFRS Foundation An overview of IFRS 17 Asia-Pacific Financial Forum, Hong Kong, 31 October 2017 Darrel Scott, Board Member, IASB The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not
More informationIFRS AT A GLANCE IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
IFRS AT A GLANCE IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Page 1 of 4 IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts DEFINITIONS Insurance risk Risk, other than financial risk, transferred from the holder of a contract to the issuer.
More informationNZ IFRS 17 Insurance contracts
NZ IFRS 17 Insurance contracts New Zealand Society of Actuaries 30 October 2017 Welcome Jamie Munro Head of Insurance, KPMG 2 We passionately believe that the flow-on effect from focusing on helping fuel
More informationSESSION/SÉANCE: IFRS 4, Phase II Update on new standards for insurance contracts CIA Appointed Actuaries Seminar Toronto, September 20, 2012
SESSION/SÉANCE: IFRS 4, Phase II Update on new standards for insurance contracts CIA Appointed Actuaries Seminar Toronto, September 20, 2012 SPEAKER(S)/CONFÉRENCIER(S): Jacqueline Friedland, FCIA, FCAS,
More informationQuestions to EFRAG TEG 3 Do EFRAG TEG members have comments on the comparison between US GAAP requirements for insurance and IFRS 17?
EFRAG TEG meeting 13-14 June 2018 Paper 13-04 EFRAG Secretariat: Insurance team This paper has been prepared by the EFRAG Secretariat for discussion at a public meeting of EFRAG TEG. The paper forms part
More informationNovember 27, Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
November 27, 2013 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts File Reference No. 2013-290 The Financial Reporting Executive
More informationIFRS4 Phase 2 OVERVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES
IFRS4 Phase 2 OVERVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES 23RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE CARIBBEAN ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION SECRETS WILD ORCHID MONTEGO BAY, JAMAICA DECEMBER 5, 2013 Robert Berendsen FSA, FCIA,
More informationIntroduction to IFRS November 2018
Introduction to IFRS 17 9 November 2018 Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter(s) and not necessarily of the Society of Actuaries in Ireland or of their employers
More informationGeneral insurance reserving
General insurance reserving Challenges for today and tomorrow IFRS Phase 2 by Richard Bulmer Tuesday 7 May 2013 2013 Towers Watson. All rights reserved. IFRS 4 Phase II: Project Objectives and Timeline
More informationIFRS Project Insights Insurance Contracts
IFRS Project Insights Insurance Contracts October 2015 The International Accounting Standards Board ( IASB / the Board ) is undertaking a comprehensive project on the accounting for insurance contracts,
More informationED/2013/7 Insurance Contracts; and Proposed Accounting Standards Update Insurance Contracts (Topic 834)
Tel +44 (0)20 7694 8871 8 Salisbury Square Fax +44 (0)20 7694 8429 London EC4Y 8BB mark.vaessen@kpmgifrg.com United Kingdom Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon
More informationIFRS 17. Pivoting towards implementation. IFRS Foundation. Darrel Scott, Board Member Iza Ruta, Technical Manager. Windsor, June 2017
IFRS Foundation IFRS 17 Pivoting towards implementation Darrel Scott, Board Member Iza Ruta, Technical Manager Windsor, June 2017 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not
More information17: what to do now. Implications for Singapore insurers
17: what to do now Implications for Singapore insurers Executive summary The International Accounting Standard Board (IASB or Board) has concluded its deliberations on the new Insurance Accounting Standard,
More informationNew IFRS Insurance Contracts Project
IFRS Foundation New IFRS Insurance Contracts Project Vienna, Austria Darrel Scott, IASB Member The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the International
More informationUsing Solvency II to implement IFRS 17
www.pwc.co.uk 4 Using Solvency II to implement IFRS 17 September 2017 How can you make the best use of existing Solvency II systems and processes to ensure as smooth and efficient a transition to IFRS
More informationInsurance alert ISAB/FASB Board Meeting Insurance Contracts
www.pwc.com/insurance Insurance alert ISAB/FASB Board Meeting Insurance Contracts PwC Summary of Meetings 13-15 June 2011 Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at FASB and IASB meetings, and it is
More informationCONTACT(S) Anne McGeachin +44 (0) Andrea Pryde +44 (0)
IASB Agenda ref 2 STAFF PAPER IASB Meeting Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Cover note CONTACT(S) Anne McGeachin amcgeachin@ifrs.org +44 (0) 20 7246 6486 Andrea Pryde apryde@ifrs.org +44 (0) 20
More informationIFRS 17 beyond implementation, towards commercial implications
IFRS 17 beyond implementation, towards commercial implications Chris Hancorn, PwC Hong Kong Jenny Jiang, Morgan Stanley Asia The Actuarial Society of Hong Kong 28 Agenda Overview: the changing financial
More informationCONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli +44 (0) Hagit Keren +44 (0)
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting October 2018 Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Concerns and implementation challenges CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli rravelli@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6935 Hagit Keren hkeren@ifrs.org
More informationHans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. 25 October Dear Mr Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH 25 October 2013 Dear Mr Hoogervorst, Exposure Draft: Insurance Contracts We would like to thank the IASB
More informationIFRS 17 Life Insurance
IFRS 17 Life Insurance Kamlesh Gupta, FIAI WIRC of ICAI October 27, 2018 Disclaimer The views presented in this presentation are personal and not necessarily of my employer or of the Institute of Actuaries
More informationTITLE. Presentation Points Convergence in Financial. Additional Points Additional Points. Reporting
TITLE Presentation Points Convergence in Financial Additional Points Additional Points Reporting Discussion Topics Convergence in financial reporting: Update on insurance contracts project Issues from
More informationIFRS17 implementation Practical challenges
IFRS17 implementation Practical challenges Tom Veerman Triple A Risk Finance B.V. 20 September 2018 1 Agenda Introduction Key implementation challenges Discussion Most relevant policy decisions Relevant
More informationIn depth A look at current financial reporting issues
30 June 2017 No. INT2017-04 What s inside? At a glance..1 Scope. 2 Combination and Separation of Insurance Contracts. 5 Recognition...10 Measurement....12 Measurement of Nonparticipating Contracts..12
More informationInd AS 117 Insurance Contracts
Ind AS 117 Insurance Contracts * What it means to Indian insurers June 2018 KPMG.com/in *Exposure Draft Foreword International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued International Financial Reporting
More informationIASB meeting on 15 November 2016
C Insurance alert IASB meeting on 15 November 2016 Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at IASB meetings, and it is often difficult to characterise the IASB's tentative conclusions, these summaries
More informationIFRS17 implementation Practical challenges
IFRS17 implementation Practical challenges Tom Veerman Triple A Risk Finance B.V. 31 May 2018 1 Agenda Introduction Key implementation challenges Discussion Most relevant policy decisions Relevant technical
More informationFuture GAAP. Doug Van Dam, FSA, MAAA Principal Consultant msg global solutions, Inc.
1 Future GAAP Doug Van Dam, FSA, MAAA Principal Consultant msg global solutions, Inc. 2 Outline of Speech 1) Background (15 minutes) 2) US GAAP P&C Disclosure (10 minutes) 3) US GAAP Long Term (20 minutes)
More informationIFRS 17 issues Transition Draft for discussion
IFRS 17 issues Transition Draft for discussion 1 Current IASB requirements and TRG conclusions... 1 1.1 IFRS 17 requirements... 1 1.2 Current understanding of the accounting treatment... 6 Selection of
More informationIFRS-FA öffentliche SITZUNGSUNTERLAGE
DRSC e.v. Zimmerstr. 30 10969 Berlin Tel.: (030) 20 64 12-0 Fax.: (030) 20 64 12-15 www.drsc.de - info@drsc.de Diese Sitzungsunterlage wird der Öffentlichkeit für die FA-Sitzung zur Verfügung gestellt,
More informationGet ready for IFRS 17
Accounting News Get ready for IFRS 17 Discussion A fundamental change to the reporting for insurance contracts June 2017 Contents Section Introduction Background Scope Initial recognition and measurement
More informationContents. Financial instruments the complete standard. Fundamental changes call for careful planning. 1. Overview Complete IFRS 9
Financial instruments the complete standard Contents Fundamental changes call for careful planning 1. Overview Complete IFRS 9 2. Classification and measurement Facts 3. Classification and measurement
More informationHeadline Verdana Bold IFRS 17: What does the long awaited standard bring? 24 November 2017, Prague
Headline Verdana Bold IFRS 17: What does the long awaited standard bring? 24 November 2017, Prague Agenda Part 1: Introduction to IFRS 17 Part 2: Measurement methodology Overview General model (BBA) Variable
More informationIFRS 4, Phase II - Ongoing changes and interaction with IFRS 9. June 9, 2015
IFRS 4, Phase II - Ongoing changes and interaction with IFRS 9 June 9, 2015 Agenda Where are we now? Why change? What s new? What s left to do? Transition Interaction with IFRS 9 and other regulatory changes
More informationNEW EXPOSURE DRAFT IFRS 4 - PHASE , Novembre 7
NEW EXPOSURE DRAFT IFRS 4 - PHASE 2 2013, Novembre 7 OVERVIEW 1. Background to the project 2. Key points of the new ED and their impact 3. Conclusion 2 01 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT 3 BACKGROUND The insurance
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance contracts: Ready, set
IFRS 17 Insurance contracts: Ready, set Implications for Hong Kong insurers Executive summary The International Accounting Standard Board (IASB or the Board) has concluded its deliberations on the new
More informationInformation session on IFRS 17
Your Swiss Insurer. Helvetia Group Information session on IFRS 17 Agenda 1. IFRS 17 Overview 2. Building Block Approach (BBA) 3. Variable Fee Approach (VFA) 4. Premium Allocation Approach (PPA) 5. Disclosure
More informationFinancial Reporting Update
Financial Reporting Update 24 th Annual Insurance Issues Conference Monday, November 30, 2015 Newly effective and forthcoming requirements at a glance * In September 2015, the IASB tentatively decided
More informationSession 79 PD, FASB Targeted Improvements and IFRS 17. Moderator: Kyle Baxter Stolarz, FSA, MAAA
Session 79 PD, FASB Targeted Improvements and IFRS 17 Moderator: Kyle Baxter Stolarz, FSA, MAAA Presenters: Steven F. Malerich, FSA, FLMI, MAAA Gavin Thomas Stewart, FSA, MAAA Kyle Baxter Stolarz, FSA,
More informationInsurance Contracts. First Impressions IFRS 17. July kpmg.com/ifrs
Insurance Contracts First Impressions IFRS 17 July 2017 kpmg.com/ifrs Contents A whole new perspective 1 1 IFRS 17 at a glance 2 1.1 Key facts 2 1.2 Key impacts 4 2 Overview 5 3 When to apply IFRS 17 6
More informationInsurance alert Highlights
www.pwc.com/insurance Insurance alert IASB/FASB Board meetings - Insurance Contracts 18-19 April 2012 PwC Summary of Meetings 18-19 April 2012 IASB and FASB joint decision-making board meeting and FASB
More informationSession 055 PD - IFRS 17: What to Expect When You re Expecting" Moderator: Kathleen Kelly Bachman, FSA, MAAA
Session 055 PD - IFRS 17: What to Expect When You re Expecting" Moderator: Kathleen Kelly Bachman, FSA, MAAA Presenters: Kathleen Kelly Bachman, FSA, MAAA Laura S. Gray, FSA, MAAA Tara J. P. Hansen, FSA,
More informationAdviser alert Get ready for IFRS 17: A fundamental change to the reporting for insurance contracts
Adviser alert Get ready for IFRS 17: A fundamental change to the reporting for insurance contracts June 2017 Overview The Grant Thornton International IFRS team has published Get ready for IFRS 17: A fundamental
More informationIFRS Insurance Contracts. The state of play or, what is really going on?
www.pwc.com IFRS Insurance Contracts The state of play or, what is really going on? Sam Gutterman FSA, FCAS, MAAA, Hon FIA Agenda Context Current status Key issues 2 Why Current IFRS 4 Other standards
More informationU.S. GAAP & IFRS: Today and Tomorrow Sept , New York. Insurance Contracts Phase II Exposure Draft
U.S. GAAP & IFRS: Today and Tomorrow Sept. 13-14, 2010 New York Insurance Contracts Phase II Exposure Draft David Rogers Insurance Contracts Phase II Exposure Draft Liability Measurement David Y. Rogers,
More informationInsurance Contracts Discount rates, risk adjustment and OCI option. CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli +44 (0)
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting December 2018 Project Paper topic Insurance Contracts Discount rates, risk adjustment and OCI option CONTACT(S) Roberta Ravelli rravelli@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6935 This paper
More informationInsurance Contracts Project Overview
IFRS Foundation Insurance Contracts Project Overview November 2016 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the International Accounting Standards Board
More informationIFRS-FA öffentliche SITZUNGSUNTERLAGE. 04. IFRS-FA / / 13:45 15:45 Uhr 04 Insurance Contracts Stand des IASB Projekts 04_05a_IFRS-FA_IC
DRSC e.v. Zimmerstr. 30 10969 Berlin Tel.: (030) 20 64 12-0 Fax.: (030) 20 64 12-15 www.drsc.de - info@drsc.de Diese Sitzungsunterlage wird der Öffentlichkeit für die FA-Sitzung zur Verfügung gestellt,
More informationIFRS 17 and its business implications. What is IFRS 17 and how it is going to change the life of accountants and actuaries
IFRS 17 and its business implications What is IFRS 17 and how it is going to change the life of accountants and actuaries Agenda A quick overview of the new standard Recognition of profit or loss under
More informationKPMG s CFO Financial Forum Webcast
KPMG s CFO Financial Forum Webcast FASB Proposes Changes to Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments February 27, 2013 Enrique Tejerina Joe Santucci Luba Liberman Administrative CPE regulations
More informationAccounting & Auditing Update: What changes are in store for your Company
Accounting & Auditing Update: What changes are in store for your Company Presenter 1 Joshua Partlow, Johnson Lambert LLP Presenter 2 Patti Palitto, Aon Risk Solutions August 14, 2013 VCIA All Rights Reserved
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Breakfast Briefing Series Launch event 30 May 2017
Breakfast Briefing Series Launch event 30 May 2017 Agenda Agenda Items Introduction Scope of IFRS 17 Measurement Presentation and disclosures Transition IFRS 4 and IFRS 9 considerations Programme Delivery
More informationIASB education session on 19 May 2015
Insurance alert IASB education session on 19 May 2015 Since a variety of viewpoints are discussed at IASB meetings, and it is often difficult to characterise the IASB's tentative conclusions, these summaries
More informationIFRS 17 for Non-life Insurers
IFRS 17 for Non-life Insurers The General Insurance Association 5 June 2018 The better the question. The better the answer. The better the world works. Agenda 1 Overview of IFRS 17 2 Building block approach
More informationInsurance Accounting Alert
Insurance Accounting Alert www.ey.com/insuranceifrs June 2013 IASB issues revised exposure draft on insurance contracts What you should know The IASB has asked for comments on five key areas of the proposed
More informationJoint Project Watch. IASB/FASB joint projects from an IFRS perspective. December 2011
Joint Project Watch IASB/FASB joint projects from an IFRS perspective December 2011 The standard-setting activities of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the US Financial Accounting
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Towards a DEA Appendix II
EFRAG TEG meeting 26-27 July 2017 Paper 11-03 EFRAG Secretariat: Insurance team This paper has been prepared by the EFRAG Secretariat for discussion at a public meeting of EFRAG TEG. The paper forms part
More informationInsurance Contracts. HKFRS 17 Issued January Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021
HKFRS 17 Issued January 2018 Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021 Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard 17 Insurance Contracts Copyright 1 HKFRS 15 BC COPYRIGHT Copyright
More informationIFRS 17 A Non-Life Perspective. Darren Shaughnessy, Joanne Lonergan
IFRS 17 A Non-Life Perspective Darren Shaughnessy, Joanne Lonergan Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter(s) and not necessarily of the Society of Actuaries in Ireland
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standards Updates. Joint Regional Seminar on Financial Reporting, June 2006
Actuarial Services International Financial Reporting Standards Updates Joint Regional Seminar on Financial Reporting, 22-30 June 2006 Jonathan Zhao, FSA Bruce Moore, FSA 1 Agenda Background on IFRS Review
More informationIFRS 17: recent developments and main implications
IFRS 17: recent developments and main implications Kevin Griffith 13 September 2018 Today s agenda 1. 2. 3. 4. Introduction Fundamental principles What will it look like? Implementation Page 1 IFRS 17
More informationBACKGROUND BRIEFING PAPER
BACKGROUND BRIEFING PAPER IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS AND TRANSITION March 2018 This paper provides an overview of the main provisions in IFRS 17 that relate to transition. It uses highly simplified examples
More informationIFRS 4 Phase II Update & Key Insights
IFRS 4 Phase II Update & Key Insights 1 Agenda 1. Overview of the current state of play 2. Summary of changes expected from the 2013 ED 3. Business impacts under IFRS4 phase II 2 Overview of the current
More informationIFRS 17 issues Reinsurance. Draft for discussion
IFRS 17 issues Reinsurance Draft for discussion 1 Current IASB requirements and TRG conclusions... 1 1.1 IFRS 17 requirements... 1 1.2 TRG... 4 1.3 Current understanding of the accounting treatment...
More informationOctober 25, Mr. Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom
K 333 S. Wabash Ave. Chicago IL 60604 October 25, 2013 D. Craig Mense Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Telephone 312-822-1222 Facsimile 312-822-2004 Internet craig.mense@cna.com Mr.
More informationFINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. The future of IFRS financial instruments accounting IFRS NEWSLETTER
IFRS NEWSLETTER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Issue 20, February 2014 All the due process requirements for IFRS 9 have been met, and a final standard with an effective date of 1 January 2018 is expected in mid-2014.
More informationNew Developments on Revenue Recognition. Uphold public interest
New Developments on Revenue Recognition Uphold public interest IFRS 15-Revenue From Contracts with Customers Background IFRS 15 was finalised in May 2014 with the initial effective date being 1 st January
More informationInsurance Contracts Standard
International Financial Reporting Standards Insurance Contracts Standard Subsequent measurement of insurance contracts Darrel Scott IASB member The views expressed in this presentation are those of the
More informationAmendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Insurance acquisition cash flows for renewals outside the contract boundary
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting January 2019 Project Paper topic Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Insurance acquisition cash flows for renewals outside the contract boundary CONTACT(S) Hagit Keren hkeren@ifrs.org
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Overview September 20, 2017 Agenda The general measurement model (GMM) Modifications to the GMM Presentation and disclosure Transition Potential accounting changes for insurers
More informationIFRS4 An Update. PwC. *connected thinking. Presented by Shu-Yen Liu 7 th November 2007
IFRS4 An Update Presented by Shu-Yen Liu 7 th *connected thinking PwC IFRS 4 Phase I Objectives 1 2 3 Interim standard - focuses primarily on disclosures and classification of insurance contracts. Introduces
More informationGAAP and SEC Updates. Ed Chanda John Snoble
GAAP and SEC Updates Ed Chanda John Snoble Long Duration Contracts Insurance Contracts FASB Initiatives Short-Duration Contracts (Final Standard ASU 2015-09 Issued May 2015) Long-Duration Contracts (Exposure
More informationExposure Draft. Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 117, Insurance Contracts. (Last date for Comments: March 31, 2018)
ED/Ind AS/2018/03 Exposure Draft Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 117, Insurance Contracts (Last date for Comments: March 31, 2018) Issued by Accounting Standards Board The Institute of Chartered Accountants
More information20/06/2016. IFRS 4 Phase II: Solvency II with a twist? Susan Dreksler and Bob Owel. Agenda
Expired risk IFRS 4 Phase II: Solvency II with a twist? Susan Dreksler and Bob Owel 20 June 2016 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. What the Standard requires from Reserving 3. A bit of history 4. Isn t this just
More informationIFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Towards a background briefing paper on Transition
FRAG TEG meeting 07-08 March 2018 Paper 09-02 EFRAG Secretariat: Insurance team This paper has been prepared by the EFRAG Secretariat for discussion at a public meeting of EFRAG TEG. The paper forms part
More informationDear Mr. Hoogervorst,
Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH Paris, October 25 th 2013 Re: IASB ED / 2013 / 7 Insurance Contracts Dear Mr. Hoogervorst, CNP Assurances
More informationUpdate No (Issued 4 January 2018) Document Reference and Title Instructions Explanations. Insert these pages after HKFRS 16 Leases.
Update No. 211 (Issued 4 January 2018) This Update relates to the issuance of HKFRS 17 Insurance Contracts. Document Reference and Title Instructions Explanations VOLUME II Contents of Volume II Discard
More informationAccounting proposals for insurance contracts
International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting proposals for insurance contracts The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASB or IFRS Foundation.
More informationImplementing IFRS 17 in China
Insurance Accounting Insights China in focus Implementing IFRS 17 in China In preparation for the implementation of IFRS 17, this article will provide a summary on: Differences between reporting under
More informationHeadline Verdana Bold IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Thai General Insurance Association December 1, 2017
Headline Verdana Bold IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Thai General Insurance Association December 1, 2017 Agenda 1. Introduction 4-13 2. IFRS 17 Measurement Model 14-30 3. Presentation and disclosures 31-57
More informationCONTACT(S) Chalani Mohotti +44 (0) Andrea Pryde +44 (0)
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting Project Paper topic Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Cover note CONTACT(S) Chalani Mohotti cmohotti@ifrs.org +44 (0)20 7246 6436 Andrea Pryde apryde@ifrs.org +44 (0)20
More information