VDOT s Pavement Management Program Virginia Asphalt Association Annual Meeting, 2013

Transcription

1 VDOT s Pavement Management Program Virginia Asphalt Association Annual Meeting, 2013 Commissioner Gregory Whirley Virginia Department of Transportation

2 Outline of the Presentation Where we are now current pavement conditions What we plan to achieve pavement condition goals How we will achieve our goals performance target monitoring and reporting 2

3 VDOT Maintained Lane Miles by District and System District Interstate Primary Secondary Frontage Total Bristol 530 2,962 12, ,898 Salem 493 2,667 14, ,967 Lynchburg - 2,808 12, ,226 Richmond 1,321 3,416 13, ,659 Hampton Roads 874 1,849 7, ,929 Fredericksburg 281 2,185 9, ,736 Culpeper 279 1,869 8, ,440 Staunton 940 2,475 10, ,991 Nova 685 1,563 10, ,869 Statewide 5,403 21,794 98, ,715 3

4 % Network Pavement Condition 2012 (Interstate) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Condition 41.0% 31.9% 10.0% 6.9% 10.2% 4

5 % Network Pavement Condition 2012 (Primary) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Very Excellent Good Fair Poor Poor Condition 35.9% 35.9% 9.4% 8.5% 10.3% 5

6 % Network Pavement Condition 2012 (Secondary) 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Very Excellent Good Fair Poor Poor Condition 11.9% 32.7% 16.1% 12.5% 26.8% 6

7 % Sufficient Network Percent Sufficient by District 2012 (Interstate) 100% % Sufficient : 82.9% Statewide Target > 82% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1/BR 2/SA 4/RI 5/HR 6/FR 7/CU 8/ST 9/NO Condition 79.9% 86.0% 71.7% 72.0% 96.0% 91.0% 95.7% 90.0% 7

8 % Sufficient Network Percent Sufficient by District 2012 (Primary) % Sufficient : 81.2% Statewide Target > 82% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1/BR 2/SA 3/LY 4/RI 5/HR 6/FR 7/CU 8/ST 9/NO Condition 77.1% 78.7% 90.2% 74.6% 85.2% 82.8% 89.0% 87.0% 67.4% 8

9 % Network Trend in Percent Sufficient (Interstate and Primary) 100% 90% Statewide Target > 82% 80% 70% 60% 50% Interstate 79.5% 79.9% 78.4% 80.3% 82.9% Primary 75.6% 75.7% 73.3% 77.6% 81.2% 9

10 % Network Trend in Percent Sufficient (Secondary) 100% 90% 80% 70% Statewide Target > 65% 60% 50% %Sufficient 71.3% 68.9% 65.8% 64.2% 60.7% 10

11 Pavement Condition - Goals Interstate system Statewide 82% sufficiency target has been achieved All districts will achieve and maintain 82% sufficiency rating or better Begin addressing critical sections in very poor condition Primary system We will reach statewide 82% sufficiency target this year All districts will achieve and maintain 82% sufficiency rating or better Secondary system All districts will achieve and maintain 65% sufficiency rating or better 11

12 Performance Target Monitoring and Reporting VDOT is responsible for monitoring and reporting conditions, meeting performance targets on pavements Performance targets are set and approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) VDOT Commissioner has to report to the CTB every year on the status of performance VDOT is legislatively mandated to report to the General Assembly every year on maintenance and operation needs and on performance MAP 21 Federal reauthorization has established system preservation as a priority 12

13 Performance Target Monitoring and Reporting VDOT issued an Instructional and Informational Memorandum MD-001 to formalize the process for establishing annual pavement performance targets and monitoring paving project development and execution activities 13

14 Purpose of the Performance Target Monitoring and Reporting (Contd.) Create a formal, documented process for monitoring targets Foster accountability and transparency Establish achievable targets to guide District programs Sets performance and paving targets using objective information Monitor project development & execution Verify adequacy of planned work to meet established targets Provide opportunity for course correction during planning process Track planned work through completion Validate selected treatment against identified needs 14

15 Purpose of the Performance Target Monitoring and Reporting Primary outputs from the process Paving and performance targets Performance targets (% Sufficient) Paving targets (Lane Miles) Preventive Maintenance (PM) Corrective Maintenance (CM) Restorative Maintenance (RM) Reconstruction / Major Rehab (RC) Monthly status reports Compare planned paving to targets by maintenance category Location specific comparison of District treatment selection to needs 15

16 Expected Benefits Transparency Clearly defined performance measures Objective methodology for assessing performance Uniformity in Approach Strengthen link between budgeting, program development and execution Traceability between Pavement Management System (PMS) needs analysis and actual work planned/completed Improve PMS models to better reflect project costs/constraints and pavement deterioration 16

17 Expected Benefits (Contd.) Accountability Establish achievable performance measures based on funding and condition Analyze planned work to provide opportunities for course correction Track planned work through advertisement and completion Targeted Investment Optimize benefits of investment and perform appropriate amount of preservation work Select the Right treatment, at the Right place, at the Right time 17

18 Questions? 18