Workshop. 2:00 PM Meeting called to order on March 8, 2016 at District Office-Board Room, 919 North Broad Street, Brooksville, FL.

Transcription

1 Hernando County School Board Mission Statement The Hernando County School District Collaborates with parents and other community stakeholders to effectively prepare all students for a successful transition into a diverse and changing world. WORKSHOP Workshop :00 PM CALL TO ORDER Workshop 2:00 PM Meeting called to order on March 8, 2016 at District Office-Board Room, 919 North Broad Street, Brooksville, FL. PRESENTATIONS A. Agenda Item (ID # 1651) Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions B. Agenda Item (ID # 1637) Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update GENERAL COUNSEL ADDENDUM ITEMS GOOD OF THE ORDER/BOARD DISCUSSION School Board Comments ADJOURNMENT Hernando County School Board Page 1 Updated 3/8/2016 8:52 AM

2 Workshop :00 PM A Workshop Agenda Item #1651 Title Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions Executive Summary The Assistant Director of Transportation, on behalf of the Superintendent of Schools, will present a status update on the implementation of Synovia Solutions software. Board Action Requested Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions My Contact Ralph Leath Assistant Director of Transportation 352/ Strategic Focus Area (O) Safe, secure and energy efficient operations Financial Impact No Financial Impact - Informational Only Attachments: ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 ITEM A.2: Budget E-Agenda

3 Ralph Leath Assistant Director of Transportation March 8, 2016 A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

4 Synovia History Synovia Implementation Challenges Synovia Benchmark Status Current Status Conclusion ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions) A.1

5 Synovia received Board approval on December Synovia was implemented to provide cost savings, student security, and transportation efficiency. Synovia provided three elements in the solutions package: Student Tracking GPS Tracking Time & Attendance Synovia began installation in late January A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

6 Synovia Implementation Challenges: Routing Software integration with Synovia Synovia tablets not accessing student, stop, or route information Synovia tablets not allowing operators to access program or log on/off tablet Routing software company seeking compensation to access transportation data Scan cards do not identify student at correct stop location Scan cards do not identify student when boarding bus Tablets must be synced multiple times to receive data Tablets not receiving system updates A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

7 Engine Diagnostics: Lower service calls by 5% each year Benchmark: 81 service calls 2013/2014 7/2015 present: 34 service calls; 42% reduction Student Ridership Verification: 95% or greater successful ID card reads 54% of students ridership scan accuracy Comparative Analysis: Increase route compliance by 5% each year Route compliance baseline will be established after the 2015/2016 school year A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

8 Time & Attendance: 95% or greater accurate payroll reporting. We have not implemented due to tablet issues GPS: 97% or greater service availability GPS implemented with 97% or greater service availability Software: Patches, updates, and service packs will be installed within 5 business days upon becoming available to Synovia 97% or greater software availability Benchmark: We have received updates and software usage The tablets are not receiving the software updates A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

9 GPS: Idle time reduction of 5% per year Benchmark was not set prior to school year. Benchmark would need a complete school year to achieve accurate benchmark Currently there are 16 hours of excess idle time per day; this equates to 9 minute average of excess idle time per bus Engine Diagnostic: Increase MPG by 5% each year Benchmark: MPG 6.61 Present: August 24, 2015 present: 6.65 Comparative Analysis Increase on time performance by 5% each year on time % = 82% Present: August 24, 2015 present on time arrival: 93% A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

10 Current Status Difficulties with the correct information updating on the tablet The tablet must be synced multiple times a day to upload student, stop, and route information Bus Operators are receiving unauthorized error message when signing onto tablet GPS working and vital to our transportation operation Time & Attendance has not been implemented A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

11 Does Synovia Provide Cost Savings ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions) A.1

12 Synovia s Latest Proposals John King CEO for Synovia Solutions has made the following proposals: Hernando County would not pay for the solutions until we are satisfied with the implementation or a mutually agreed date. His team would manually update the tablets to the current software update. All future updates will occur wirelessly. His team would replace all scan card readers with improved scan card reader hardware. We would pilot the new card readers to verify they are working. Requests our school district implement the Time and Attendance feature before the 2016/2017 school year. A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

13 Board Options Option 1: The Board can choose to discontinue the contract with Synovia Solutions. Option 2: The Board can choose to allow Synovia Solutions to resolve our concerns as proposed by John King, CEO Synovia Solutions. Option 3: The Board can allow staff to investigate the cost for only the GPS solution provided by Synovia Solutions. A.1 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions)

14 ITEM A.1: Synovia Update Presentation 3-8v2 (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia Solutions) A.1

15 A.2 Budget Information: Either Section A or B $ A. Item Currently Budgeted - Account Name Account Number No financial impact MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL FOR PLACEMENT CONSIDERATION. (For Donations, use Section B) Fund Function Object Cost Center Project Sub Project Original Budget Expenditures / Current Present Remaining Approved + Amendments - Encumbrances = Available - Request = Balance Budget - To Date Budget Available B. Item Currently Not Budgeted - Funding Source Account Name Account Number Amount Fund Function Object Cost Center Project Sub Project ITEM A.2: Budget E-Agenda (1651 : Presentation of Status Update for Transportation Project - Synovia

16 Workshop :00 PM B Title Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update Executive Summary Workshop Agenda Item #1637 The Director of Facilities Operations will present a status update of district wide projects. A project status list is attached. Separate attachments related to the Citizen's 1/2 Cent Tax Accountability Committee, along with the economic impact study as described on the status update sheet, are included in this months update. Board Action Requested Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update My Contact Erik Van de Boogaard Director of Facilities Operations (352) vandeboogaard_e@hcsb.k12.fl.us Strategic Focus Area (O) Safe, secure and energy efficient operations Financial Impact No financial impact for this item. Attachments: ITEM B.1: mar 2016 ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study ITEM B.3: Meeting Minutes ITEM B.4: No Financial Impact Budget Sheet

17 B.1 Facilities Operations Monthly Board Update Mar-16 Construction Projects Status Estimated Cost Actual Cost Notes CK-8 seal and restripe rear lot Scheduling $ 6, plumbing fixtures, window replacement, reroofing/eastside Elementary School Project # Waiting on 1/2 cent funds FCMS Gym Roof Replacement Construction $200,000 $ 228, Start construction/spring break FCMS kitchen upgrades/servery Waiting for PO issuance $250,000 HHS Gymnasium exterior paint Complete $ 17, HHS Press Box and Bleacher Repairs HHS ADA Restrooms/Baseball Waiting on 1/2 cent funds Waiting on 1/2 cent funds JD Floyd re-roof various buildings/phase 2 Complete $1,112,000 $ 692, Next phases will be re-bid due to fund availability MES Front Parking Lot Asphalt # Design PMS Switchgear # Design SES parent pick up driveway widening # Design $150,000 SHS building 10 re-roof Construction $617,000 $ 553, Various Life Safety, Electrical and Misc Projects Waiting on 1/2 cent funds WHMS HVAC upgrades-phase 2 Phase 2/design stage $3,000,000 $ 741, WES Roofing, HVAC and Tech project Construction $3,900,000 $ 3,521, roofing nearing completion/delays for school testing Hurricane Retrofit in conjunction with Hernando County Emergency Management Contract approval between State and County $918,304 Awaiting County Direction Totals $10,147,304 $ 5,761, Other McKeathen lease Re-advertise Developing 16/17 5 year CIP Energy Savings Contracting RFP Issued Feb 2016 ITEM B.1: mar 2016 (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 1/2 cent Tax Accountability Committee inaugural meeting Chairman, Gregg Laskoski introduction HCSD Economic Impact Study Separate attachment

18 B HERNANDO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Economic Analysis Program

19 B.2 Authors Randy Deshazo Principal Economic Planner Avera Wynne Planning Director Contact (727) X 31 January The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council is an association of local governments from Hernando, Manatee, Pasco and Pinellas Counties. About the Economic Analysis Program Since 1999, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has been producing economic impact studies for a variety of public and private sector clients. Using the most powerful analytical tools, including REMI PI+ and IMPLAN, the Council s Economic Analysis Program has produced hundreds of reports covering topics such as job creation, land use, natural resources and energy, as well as a variety of public policy questions. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following for their assistance in preparing this report: Dr. Lori Romano, Ph.D. Superintendent Hernando School District Erik van de Boogaard Director of Facilities Operations Hernando County School District ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 1

20 B.2 Introduction At the request of the Hernando County School District, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council conducted a study of the economic impacts of the District s work force and capital improvement program. The District employs 3,008 personnel in a variety of positions in teaching, administration, and other support staff. The payroll for the District in 2015 was $104,941,494. The District also maintains a 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP includes $2.8 million in budgeted projects for fiscal year 2015, and $39 million in projects through 2019, or an average of $9.8 million per year, in maintenance, repair and upgrades and new construction. Summary of Economic Impacts Table 1 summarizes the economic impacts of School District Direct Employment. Table 1 Florida Strawberry Festival Economic Impact Summary Table (All Spending) Summary of Economic Impacts of School District Direct Employment Category Units 2015 Hernando Florida* Direct Employment Full Time Equivalents (Jobs) 3, Indirect Employment Full Time Equivalents (Jobs) 865 2,092 Total Employment Full Time Equivalents (Jobs) 3,873 5,100 Gross Regional Product Millions of Nominal (2015) Dollars Personal Income Millions of Nominal (2015) Dollars *Cumulative impacts for Hernando County and all other Florida counties. While BEBR (the Bureau of Economic and Business Research) estimates Hernando County s 2015 population at 176,819, REMI PI+ estimates Hernando County s 2015 population at 174,963 with a total employment at 61,220. With a labor force of 62,444, unemployment in the county is low. Overall, Hernando County s share of the Tampa Bay Area s regional employment 1 has remained small, accounting for 2 percent of total regional employment in 1990 (28,400 of 1.2 million) and only 3 percent in 2015 (61,000 of 1.8 million). As the chart on the next page shows, job growth in the county has largely tracked that of the Tampa Bay Region, but has been faster than the rest of the region, growing by 54 percent compared to 34 percent between 1990 and Average private sector non-farm compensation in the county for 2015 is $22,542, compared to $36,883 across the Tampa Bay Area. As such, the average compensation of School District employees, $34,887, raises the average wage in the County even though the District only comprises 5 percent of the total employment of Hernando County. ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) There are few other large employers in Hernando County aside from a large Walmart Distribution Center and the Hernando Airport Industrial Park. Since large employers often have 1 The Tampa Bay Area includes Citrus, Hernando, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, and Pinellas Counties. 2

21 B.2 significant capital programs, the construction impacts of the District s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are also analyzed in the study. However, because the CIP varies significantly from year-to-year and comprises a different set of activities from the routine operation of the District, construction impacts are calculated separately from the annual impact of School District payroll. In this study, the Council estimates the overall impact of the School District on the Hernando County economy from both employment and the CIP. Components of the Economic Impact Study The study describes the economic effects of School District activities across five economic categories. Direct employment is the total number of employees that are employed by the School District. Indirect employment is all of the employment generated by fulfilling demand created by School District purchasing of goods and services, and household demand. Total employment is simply the sum of direct and indirect employment. Gross Regional Product is the sum of the gross values added of all resident, institutional units engaged in production (plus any taxes, and minus any subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs). The term is the same as Gross Domestic Product, reduced to a regional context. Personal income is the aggregated income of total employment. The following piechart depicts the percentage of indirect jobs created in Hernando County by industry. One way of reading the chart is that for every 100 direct jobs created by the School District, 22 jobs are created in retail trade, 14 jobs are created in health care, and so on. ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 3

22 B.2 Table 2 summarizes the jobs that are created in Hernando County in a given year by the ongoing operations of the School District. Indirect jobs are broken down by industry in the Table. Table 2 Industry Jobs Direct Jobs (School District) 3,008 Indirect Jobs Breakdown of Indirect Jobs 865 Retail Trade 189 Health Care and Social Assistance 119 Administrative and Waste Management Services 88 Other Services, except Public Administration 88 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 84 Accommodation and Food Services 82 Construction 67 Finance and Insurance 48 Transportation and Warehousing 28 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 16 Mining 10 Wholesale Trade 9 Management of Companies and Enterprises 9 Manufacturing 7 Information 7 Forestry, Fishing, and Related Activities 5 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 5 Total 865 ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 4

23 B.2 Table 3 summarizes the economic impacts of the School District s Capital Improvements Program. Table 3 Florida Strawberry Festival Economic Impact Summary Table (All Spending) Summary of Economic Impacts of School District Capital Investment Programming Category Units 2015 Budgeted Average Annual Impact Hernando Florida* Hernando Florida* Total Employment Full Time Equivalents (Jobs) Gross Regional Product Millions of Nominal (2015) Dollars Personal Income Millions of Nominal (2015) Dollars *Cumulative impacts for Hernando County and all other Florida counties. Conclusions The Hernando County School District is an important economic driver in Hernando County beyond its role in adding value to the local economy through educating the County s students. As Table 2 shows, the range of industries that are influenced by the School District s activities is impressive. The employment multiplier for the Hernando County School District is That means that for every 100 School District jobs, 28 more jobs are created in the Hernando County economy because of demand for goods and services by the District or by employee household demand. For every dollar the district spends on ongoing operations, 56 additional cents are created in Hernando County as personal income. Ongoing construction also provides a positive contribution to the Hernando and State economies. In Hernando, every million dollars spent on construction generates about 54 jobs, while statewide every million dollars generates about 65 jobs. ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 5

24 B.2 About REMI PI+ Founded in 1980, Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI) constructs models that reveal the economic and demographic effects that policy initiatives or external events may cause on a local economy. REMI model users include national, regional, state and city governments, as well as universities, nonprofit organizations, public utilities and private consulting firms. A major feature of REMI Policy Insight is that it is a dynamic model which forecasts how changes in the economy and adjustments to those changes will occur on a year-by-year basis. The model is sensitive to a very wide range of policy and project alternatives and to interactions between the regional and national economies. By pointing and clicking, you can answer the toughest What if? questions about federal, state, local or regional economies. Model Introduction Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council s REMI Policy Insight includes a REMI model that has been built especially for the Tampa Bay region version of the model and a state model. The model-building system uses hundreds of programs developed over the past two decades to build customized models for each area using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Department of Energy, the Census Bureau and other public sources. The REMI model is a structural model, meaning that it clearly includes cause-and-effect relationships. The model shares two key underlying assumptions with mainstream economic theory: households maximize utility and producers maximize profits. Since these assumptions make sense to most people, the model can be understood by intelligent lay people as well as trained economists. In the model, businesses produce goods to sell to other firms, consumers, investors, governments and purchasers outside the region. The output is produced using labor, capital, fuel and intermediate inputs. The demand for labor, capital and fuel per unit of output depends on their relative costs, since an increase in the price of any one of these inputs leads to substitution away from that input to other inputs. The supply of labor in the model depends on the number of people in the population and the proportion of those people who participate in the labor force. Economic migration affects the population size. More people will move into an area if the real after-tax wage rates or the likelihood of being employed increases in a region. Supply and demand for labor in the model determine the wage rates. These wage rates, along with other prices and productivity, determine the cost of doing business for every industry in the model. An increase in the cost of doing business causes either an increase in price or a cut in profits, depending on the market for the product. In either case, an increase in cost would decrease the share of the local and U.S. market supplied by local firms. This market share combined with the demand described above determines the amount of local output. Of course, the model has many other feedbacks. For example, changes in wages and employment impact income and consumption, while economic expansion changes investment and population growth impacts government spending. Model Overview ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) A pictorial representation of the model is below. The Output block shows a factory that sells to all the sectors of final demand as well as to other industries. The Labor and Capital Demand 6

25 B.2 block shows how labor and capital requirements depend both on output and their relative costs. Population and Labor Supply are shown as contributing to demand and to wage determination in the product and labor market. The feedback from this market shows that economic migrants respond to labor market conditions. Demand and supply interact in the Wage, Price and Profit block. Once prices and profits are established, they determine market shares, which along with components of demand, determine output. The REMI model brings together all of the above elements to determine the value of each of the variables in the model for each year in the baseline forecasts. The model includes all the interindustry relationships that are in an input-output model in the Output block, but goes well beyond the input-output model by including the relationships in all of the other blocks shown in the figure. In order to broaden the model in this way, it was necessary to estimate key relationships. This was accomplished by using extensive data sets covering all areas in the country. These large data sets and two decades of research effort have enabled REMI to simultaneously maintain a theoretically sound model structure and build a model based on all the relevant data available. The model has strong dynamic properties, which means that it forecasts not only what will happen but when it will happen. This results in long-term predictions that have general equilibrium properties. This means that the long-term properties of general equilibrium models are preserved without sacrificing the accuracy of event timing predictions and without simply taking elasticity estimates from secondary sources. ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 7

26 B.2 Glossary Employment: Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) compensated labor. Gross Regional Product: The sum of the gross values added of all resident, institutional units engaged in production (plus any taxes, and minus any subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs). The term is the same as Gross Domestic Product, reduced to a regional context. Personal Income: Compensation to employed labor. Value Added: revenue less outside purchases (of materials and services). ITEM B.2: 2016 HCSD Economic Impact Study (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) 8

27 B.3 SALES TAX ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Organizational/Inaugural Meeting February 18, 2016 Meeting called to order by Erik van de Boogaard at 10:05 am in the Ken Austin Room at the District Headquarters. Present were: Donald Don Caquelin, Gregg Laskoski, Jeffrey Jeff Rogers, James Scavetta, Lori Sowers, Robert Bob Widmar, and Erik van de Boogaard. Kendra Sittig was absent due to illness. Everyone on the committee introduced themselves and gave a brief background. Selection of Officers The officers were nominated and selected. A motion for chairman was made. Gregg Laskoski was nominated by Bob Widmar and seconded by Jeff Rogers. Motion passed. A motion for vice-chairman was made. Don Caquelin was nominated by Don Caquelin and seconded by Lori Sowers. Motion passed. A motion for secretary was made. Lori Sowers was nominated by Bob Widmar and seconded by Jeff Rogers. Motion passed. Officers are: Filling of Vacancy Chair Gregg Laskoski Vice-Chair Don Caquelin Secretary Lori Sowers The committee members will spread the word of the open vacancy. We will have interested parties submit the application to Erik. Our hope is that by next meeting, the additional seat is appointed. Purpose The committee was formed to provide an oversight of the spending of the sales tax revenue. We are to ensure to our best ability that the funds are expended within the terms of the sales tax resolution voted into effect on September 8, This committee is not subject to Government in the Sunshine laws, although the public will be invited to observe the meetings. The committee will report to the Superintendent. The committee members are subject to the FL ethics laws, though not required to submit financial disclosures. ITEM B.3: Meeting Minutes (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) SALES TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, OF 2

28 B.3 Each member can serve a maximum of 2 2 year terms. The initial terms will be staggered so there is some continuity on the committee in the beginning years. The meetings will be 4 times a year, though they may be more frequent at the beginning. Goals/Action Items Erik explained that project priorities are set first by life safety, then deteriorating conditions. He has gone through the initial project list and prioritized those projects. From reading the resolution it looks as if the sales tax revenue can only be spent on the projects that were included in Exhibit A that was attached to the resolution. We would like to seek advice from counsel to see if that interpretation of Section 2, Item C of the resolution is correct. What if an emergency project that otherwise meets the terms of the resolution comes up? Also, are we tied to the dollar amount noted on the project list. If a project comes in higher that what was projected, can the revenues still be used for that project? In addition, if there is a surplus after the 10 years, what happens to the funds? Erik would like to start moving projects forward now in anticipation of summer projects. The first funding will not come in until sometime in March and he would like to start putting out RFPs and doing other things to get ready for the projects that may cost some money initially that the sales tax fund does not have at this time. A concern brought up by the members was the public perception of the school board being unfriendly to local, small contractors. Erik agreed that the paperwork and timelines are tedious. There are some procedures that have to be followed due to state law, but we would like to see if the processes and procedures can be streamlined to attract more local contractors to keep the tax money in the county. Discussion ensued about the information the committee would like to view at the meetings. Erik noted that the revenues from the sales tax will all go into Revenue Fund 398D. Erik will be keeping a spreadsheet on each project. We would like to see that spreadsheet and a printout of the fund account from TERMS. Since Kendra could not attend, we request she give us a sample of how she will report the revenues and expenditures to the committee. Erik will be responsible for presenting to the board the project status, revenue in and spending out. Since Erik has a Facilities page on the District website, we would like to see information relayed to the public on that page. We would also like to possible see something communicated via facebook. Next Meeting ITEM B.3: Meeting Minutes (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update) April 21, 2016 at 10:00 am. It will be held at the Facilities office at 8008 Mobley Rd. SALES TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, OF 2

29 B.4 Budget Information: Either Section A or B A. Item Currently Budgeted - Account Name No funds requested for this item Account Number MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL FOR PLACEMENT CONSIDERATION. (For Donations, use Section B) Fund Function Object Cost Center Project Sub Project Original Budget Expenditures / Current Present Remaining Approved + Amendments - Encumbrances = Available - Request = Balance Budget - To Date Budget Available $ $ $ $ 0.00 $ $ 0.00 B. Item Currently Not Budgeted - Funding Source Account Name Account Number Amount $ Fund Function Object Cost Center Project Sub Project ITEM B.4: No Financial Impact Budget Sheet (1637 : Facilities Operations Monthly Status Update)