Study Presentation. Vice President, OPORA RUSSIA. N.I. Zolotykh. July 9, 2010.

Transcription

1 Study Presentation Vice President, OPORA RUSSIA N.I. Zolotykh July 9,

2 Study Partners RUSNANO T h e p r o j e c t w a s p e r f o r m e d b y : B a u m a n I n n o v a t I o n / S t r a t e g y P a r t n e r s, a m e m b e r o f g r o u p o f c o m p a n I e s o f S b e r b a n k R u s s I a 2

3 National Innovation Systems Competitiveness Rating 1 USA 18 Hong Kong (China) 35 Thailand 2 Sweden 19 Taiwan 36 Turkey 3 Switzerland 20 New Zealand 37 Poland 4 Singapore 21 Spain 38 Russian Federation 5 Finland 22 Czech Republic 39 Latvia 6 Germany 23 Italy 40 Mexico 7 Israel 24 Estonia 41 Columbia 8 Japan 25 Slovenia 42 Romania 9 United Kingdom 26 Portugal 43 Philippines 10 Netherlands 27 Hungary 44 Argentina 11 Norway 28 India 45 Bulgaria 12 South Korea 29 China 46 Peru 13 Austria 30 South African Republic 47 Salvador 14 Canada 31 Brazil 48 Venezuela 15 Australia 32 Lithuania 49 Bangladesh 16 France 33 Greece 50 Bolivia 17 Ireland 34 Slovakia Source: Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 3

4 Innovation Systems Competitiveness Factors 10% 15% 15% 25% Demand conditions 8* 5* Talents and ideas 29* 20% Commercialization Infrastructure 20% Company innovation potential 10% State management efficiency 11* 22* Source: Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 4 8* * Number of indicators used in assessment (assessment is done using 83 indicators)

5 Surveys of Innovation System Players Done Within the Project Survey of leading Russian scientists working in Russia (203 respondents) Survey of managers of Russian small innovative companies (200 companies) Survey of managers of Russian medium-sized and large companies (250 companies) Russian Public polling (2000 respondents) Source: Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 5

6 Government Expenditures on Education Worldwide Share (%) of government expenditures on education of GDP in 2007 Israel Finland USA France Poland Ukraine Belarus Brazil Turkey Russia Japan Chile India 6,2% 6,1% 5,7% 5,6% 5,5% 5,4% 5,2% 5,1% 4,0% 3,9% 3,5% 3,4% 3,2% Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, World Bank, analysis by Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 6

7 Scientific Literacy of Russian Public Compared to Other Countries 77% Understanding of scientific nature status in different countries (in percent of those interviewed) 66% 53% 60% 48% 68% 11% 6% 27% 19% 18% 18% F inland US A F rance Latvia R ussia P oland NOT consider astrology a science Consider astrology a science Data for Russia 2007, European countries 2005, USA 2006, Sources О.R. Shuvalova, Does Public Need Knowledge?, Alma Mater: Bulletin of Higher School No.3 7

8 Specialists in Russian Science: What Scientists Think Accessibility of qualified specialists on labour market 18% 23% 19% 24% 11% 4% 1% Staff shortage Staff sufficiency Inflow of young scientists in science over past 3 years 11% 18% 29% 23% 14% 4% 1% Weak Active Outflow of scientists from the country over past 3 years 16% 13% 18% 25% 13% 9% 7% Active Weak Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 8

9 System of Research Activity Funding: What Scientists Think Current scope of funding Competition to get competitive funding 19% 2% 16% 2% 16% Scanty, impedes research activity Weak 20% 21% 25% 2% 24% 13% 5% Sufficient for fruitful activity 34% Strong Requirements adequacy to proposal content 10% 14% 13% Non-adequate, there are many excessive things 25% 14% 12% 11% Adequate Competence of competitive commissions Relevance of grant sizes to targets 8% Low 18% 15% Insufficient funds 18% 17% 23% 29% 18% 8% 5% High 3% 19% 16% 3% Sufficient funds Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 9

10 Experience of Commercialization of Research Activity Results: What Scientists Think Fundraising for research 25% 34% 19% 18% 3% 1% commercialization Difficult Easy Attempts to commercialize research activity results No Yes, successful Yes, but unsuccessful Yes, but it is too early to speak of the result Own funds or funds of friends Investments of Russian companies Investments of foreign companies Foundation for Assistance to Small Innovative Enterprises Sources of financing Venture fund Banking credit 39% Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA * Number of answers exceeds 100%: Several variants of answers were admitted 10 Other

11 Consumer Readiness To Purchase Innovative Products Instead of Existing Ones 6% 4% 3% 7% 7% 6% 7% 11% 13% 12% 9% 26% 32% 40% 42% 18% 9% Experienced difficulty in answering NO 50% 53% 36% 49% YES, if innovative product DOES NOT DIFFER IN PRICE 48% 44% 41% 26% 23% 23% 20% YES, if innovative product COSTS SLIGHTLY MORE S weden 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% 3% 5% S lovenia Netherlands P oland L ithuania R us s ia B ulg aria YES, even if innovative product COSTS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE Sources: Special EUROBAROMETER 236 Population Innovation Readiness, Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 11

12 Innovation Infrastructure: Opinion of Small Innovative Companies Availability of facilities within business incubator 12% 30% 20% 23% 8% 7% 1% Low High Availability of specialized services 3% 25% 23% 25% 13% 8% 3% Low High Availability of specialized educational programmes 3% 12% 20% 28% 18% 16% 4% Low High Quality of specialized educational programmes 9% 13% 22% 30% 16% 7% 2% Low High Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 12

13 Intellectual Property, Standards, Regulation: Opinion of Small Innovative Companies IP protection in general 21% 19% 16% 25% 15% 2% 2% Weak Strong IP protection: patents for inventions, designs IP protection: copyrights Introduction of international standards of quality (ISO, GMP) by companies 11% 15% 17% 26% 14% 8% 9% Weak Strong 10% 17% 18% 28% 13% 9% 6% Weak Strong 21% 11% 13% 19% 12% 11 12% Weak % Strong Quality of high-technology products exports regulation 17% 11% 17% 31% 15% 5% 5% Low: regulation is a barrier High Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 13

14 Indicators of Technological Level of Production and Capabilities of Companies To Borrow Technologies and Expenditures of Companies on R&D Share (%) of expenditures of companies on R&D of GDP in Improvement of production process of companies, results of survey WEF, Source: World Economic Forum, World Bank, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, analysis by Bauman Innovation 14

15 Policy Effectiveness: opinion of small innovative companies Effectiveness of government policy in the field of science, technology and innovation 20% 28% 15% 22% 8% 5% 2% Low High Government measures to encourage innovation Financial support of R&D in companies Increase of financing of research conducted at research organizations and universities Development of engineering and natural sciences education Financial support of commercialization Increase of efficiency of existing system of public research organizations Strengthening of IP protection Development of infrastructure for commercialization Increase of efficiency of standards and industrial regulation Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 15

16 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: What Scientists Think Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 16

17 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, standards, regulation: opinion of innovative companies Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 17

18 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, standards, regulation: opinion of Russian medium-sized and large Russian companies Source: Russian Innovation Survey , Bauman Innovation, OPORA RUSSIA 18

19 Directions of Innovation Policy 1 Strategy, coordination and assessment of innovation policy Policy in the field of public research Policy in the field of commercialization and development of innovative SMEs Technology Policy 5 Regional dimension of innovation policy 6 Framework conditions and incentives 19