SHEEO Information Request Regarding Deferred Maintenance October 29, 2015
|
|
- Godwin Johnson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SHEEO Information Request Regarding Deferred Maintenance October 29, 2015 SHEEO Query: Members: Peter Blake of Virginia has a question about how common it is for states to appropriate money (cash or debt service) separately for major deferred facility maintenance needs of their public colleges and universities. Virginia has a maintenance reserve program that provides funding for major facility repairs (up to $1 million per project) that are not addressed in the institutions operating budgets and usually are too small to qualify for state capital outlay funding. Examples include roof repair, boiler and chiller replacement, and electrical system upgrades. This funding is provided in addition to the regular support provided through the Educational and General program for the operation and maintenance of the physical plant. Could you please let me know by November 5 whether your state, district, or territory: a. Appropriates funding specifically and separately for major deferred facilities maintenance needs; or b. Specifically includes costs for major deferred facilities maintenance in its formula for determining appropriations for colleges and universities but does not make a separate appropriation for them; or c. Includes no specific amount for major deferred facilities maintenance needs and assumes that colleges and universities will cover these types of costs from the total resources available to them. State Agency Responses: State a. b. c. Additional notes Alabama No. There are occasionally lines included for institutions in the budget but they are for relatively small amounts and specific projects. Alaska The answer to your question regarding state appropriations for major deferred facility maintenance needs that best fits the University of Alaska is: a. Appropriates funding specifically and separately for major deferred facilities maintenance needs Although, the state appropriation may not provide for the entire cost of the project, thus UA may be expected to cover some of the costs with internal resources (operating funds, bonding, loans, etc). Although deferred maintenance costs are included in the formula the Alabama Commission on Higher Education uses in its formula, the formula is not used by the Legislature to determine appropriation amounts to the colleges and universities so it has no impact on actual funding. This is the main method used in Alabama. The institutions are primarily responsible for all deferred maintenance and capital costs.
2 Arizona Arizona has adopted a building renewal formula (primarily based on building age and value) to determine the annual need for building repair. The state has 3 building systems, one of which is the public university system. The FY16 formula calculation for the university system was $115.9M (pending FY17 request is $129.9M); no monies were appropriated by the state for building renewal. The following shows a 10-year history of building renewal requests vs. appropriations. Fiscal Year Building Renewal Formula State Appropriation Difference from Formula Percent of Formula ,188,900 20,000,000 50,188, % ,534, ,534, % ,862, ,862, % ,525, ,525, % ,957, ,957, % ,136, ,136, % ,630, ,630, % ,401, ,401, % ,480,474 3,000, ,480, % ,892, ,892, % Totals 916,610,761 23,000, ,610, % Historically, Arizona has not had a deferred maintenance component in an (operating) budget formula; however, the pending FY17 operating budget request includes a new formula oriented approach (based primarily on achieving a dollar target per resident student). In addition, the new formula also includes a $200/student component for capital related needs (deferred maintenance and/or new construction). There have been instances in the past when the state has funded stand-alone capital initiatives (primarily debt service). Arkansas California State University Yes, CA appropriates funds separately for deferred maintenance- when it has money. The state does not have a formula for funding CSU and UC deferred maintenance needs. However, California s Prop 98 funding formula (a constitutional guarantee of state funding for K-14 education) does afford We have no dedicated funding for deferred maintenance and do not include deferred maintenance costs in funding formulas. Yes, the state has no specific amount for major deferred maintenance and assumes the CSU will cover until the state is able to identify and appropriate funds.
3 California, University of more consistent funding for the California Community Colleges which could be spend on deferred maintenance. The General Assembly of North Carolina transfers funds from the state General Fund into a Repairs and Renovations Reserve for all state agencies on an annual basis. A percentage of this Reserve is made available to the University of North Carolina s 17 system institutions through our Board of Governors. This percentage made available to UNC varies from fiscal year to fiscal year, and has been historically between 33%-60% of the available R&R Reserve. The Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina is statutorily required to allocate the UNC Repairs and Renovations funding to each of its member institutions according to a formula that takes into consideration the institution s mission, level of degree programs, net assignable square footage, gross square footage, campus population, current replacement value of facilities, facility condition index, and deferred maintenance. Specific Repairs and Renovations Capital Improvement Projects are prioritized at the campus level and updated every two years concurrent with the state of N.C. biennial budget process. When our Board of Governors allocate the R&R funds to the campuses, the capital project priorities are adjusted accordingly and funded.
4 Colorado In Colorado s budget bill, the state appropriates controlled maintenance funding for projects with a cost of less than $2 million. These projects are scored by the state architect, and placed into one of three levels. Depending on the amount of available capital funding, different levels may be funded. Institutions are eligible for these funds, but it is not limited to institutions. The state also allows institutions to pursue a Capital Renewal project. These projects are large scale controlled maintenance projects costing more than $2 million, where it is more cost effective to address a building s maintenance needs through a single, large project than one-off controlled maintenance projects. If funding is granted for these projects, they are appropriated in the state s budget bill. Maintenance needs are not part of the state s formula for determining appropriations for institutions. Although there is state funding available for maintenance, institutions fund a majority of their maintenance needs through internal funds. These funds are not appropriated, but for institutionally funded maintenance projects costing more than $2 million, a list of anticipated projects must be submitted to the Colorado Commission on Higher Education for review, and the Legislature s Capital Development Committee conducts a review. Florida The State of Florida funds education facilities through the Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) program, which moves a portion of utilities/communications tax revenue into the PECO fund. Once the amount of available PECO fund revenue is determined, there is a statutory formula that allocates a portion of the revenue to routine maintenance and the rest is available for new projects. The Legislature then appropriates a specific amount for maintenance and a specific amount for various education projects. For critical deferred maintenance, there has to be a separate request from the Board of Governors to the Legislature for consideration. We received $20 M in the fiscal year that went a long way in fixing some critical problems. Georgia, University System of In Georgia, we have a program called Major Repair and Rehabilitation (MRR) whereby our state legislature annually authorizes funds from general obligation bonds to be used for major deferred facilities maintenance needs. This program best fits your description a below as these funds are earmarked specifically for these needs and cannot be used to cover operational deficiencies or for new construction. Hawaii Option a
5 Idaho For Idaho s public colleges and universities, the category below which best describes us is a (appropriates funding specifically and separately for major deferred facilities maintenance needs). Each year, notwithstanding any dollars which may be appropriated to fund new, major capital construction projects, the state also provides Alteration and Repair project dollars which help address deferred maintenance needs. Recently, the statewide A&R appropriation has totaled around $15M to $20M each year a small (but welcomed) investment which covers a fraction of the actual deferred maintenance needs across Idaho s state facilities. While a provides the best descriptor for Idaho s approach, there is also a flavoring from the c category, since institutions often have to resort to other resources to cover some of their deferred maintenance needs. Indiana In Indiana we use a repair and rehabilitation formula that employs an index to determine the current replacement value (CRV) of the academic and administrative space of existing facilities. The formula calculates 1% of this value as a guideline for investment. In order to address ongoing maintenance and repairs as a partnership between the state and the institutions, the state has funded 50% of this calculation in recent years. Infrastructure CRV is calculated by each institution the state funds this investment at 50% also. Iowa Answer C (the state usually gives the Regents system $2 million per year for deferred maintenance our current need is $ million). Deferred maintenance is included in the Board of Regents, State of Iowa annual request for Capital Appropriations, though may not be included every year. It is requested as a lump sum to be allocated
6 Kansas Louisiana by the Regents to correct fire and environmental safety deficiencies, deferred maintenance, campus safety improvements, address regulatory compliance and energy conservation improvements, and possible specific additional projects. Actual funding is determined by the Iowa Legislature. The Capital request is part of a Five-Year Plan that is updated every year. Kansas has a statewide property tax that is for the state Regents universities to use for addressing deferred maintenance issues. The tax generates approximately $32-35 million per year, depending on valuations. State law currently does not allow it be used for any buildings built after The amount is distributed among the universities in accordance with the Board s allocation formula, based on the amount of facilities square footage. In addition, the universities selffinance from resources available to them for the buildings constructed after 2007 and as projects become necessary to keep buildings safe or usable. Louisiana Board of Regents Response: The state of Louisiana periodically appropriates funding in HB2 (the state's capital construction bill) for institutions to complete Major Repair/Deferred Maintenance
7 (MR hereafter) type projects. Between 2000 and 2008, public post-secondary institutions received a little over $168M via appropriation by the legislature to accomplish MR projects. Funding for MR projects during this time was not continuous each year, and funding was allocated via four appropriations in the 8-year period. The last major appropriation to public, postsecondary education for MR projects was in 2008 in the amount of $75M. There have not been any additional, significant appropriations for MR projects on public, postsecondary campuses since then; however, we did receive approximately $4.4M for such projects in the last fiscal year (FY14-15). Unfortunately, the $4.4M was split among 4 management systems and their 27 member institutions (does not include satellite campuses). The legislature also provided public, post-secondary education with $40M ($10M per system) in FY for operations and deferred maintenance. Although the language in the bill included "operations", some institutions were able to complete MR projects utilizing this allocation of funds. As part of its FY Capital Outlay Budget Recommendation, the Board of Regents submitted a funding request to create a pool of funds specifically for Emergency Roofing Repairs/Replacements and Emergency Major Repair/Deferred/Maintenance projects. In addition to the MR funding request on the capital side, the BoR included $10M in the operating budget request for a deferred maintenance revolving loan
8 fund. If successful in obtaining the funds during the next session, we hope said funds would be in addition to any possible appropriation(s) from the legislature for FY MR projects. In years without an appropriation(s) from the Louisiana Legislature for MR projects, institutions are generally expected to cover the costs of MR projects through their operating budgets, fees assessed to the students (facility/building-use type fees, and/or technology fees in some instances), or a combination of both. Due to cuts to higher education over the last several years in Louisiana, institutions rarely have operating funds available to cover the cost of an MR project. Some institutions are successful in utilizing their facility/building use fees for MR projects, but other institutions simply do not generate enough revenue to cover the cost of many MR projects in a timely manner. At the same time all institutions have funds budgeted for operations and maintenance (O&M), but O&M budgets normally cover the costs of facilities staff, daily/routine maintenance, etc., and do not include funds for unexpected Major Repair projects. Maine The University of Maine System currently is in category C. Maine is updating its budget process to identify capital funding as a specific and separate part of its budget and budget approval process, but that is in progress and
9 not yet completed." Massachusetts Massachusetts currently has over $2B in bond authorization to support campus projects at each of the 29 public institutions. The ten-year bond issuance was approved in 2008 (referred to in Massachusetts as the 2008 Higher Ed Bond Bill ) and has largely supported the building of new facilities; particularly STEM/Allied Health buildings. The campuses do not carry debt service to support any of the projects from the 2008 bond bill. It has been a huge game-changer in terms of new investment for the campuses, for many the first statesupported project on campus since the 70 s. Additionally, the state has a deferred maintenance bond authorization for the entire commonwealth that public higher ed is also a beneficiary (though in much smaller numbers). And those projects that benefit from that source of funds almost always fall into the critical repair/life safety category (additionally, there is bond funding for ADA projects and energy efficiency projects). The campuses, however, support projects that are for the typical end-of-life-cycle deferred maintenance projects (electrical upgrades, repointing stairs, roof repairs, etc) from their own operating budget. An annual expenditure of between 5-7% of the operating budget is not uncommon for these types of expenses. Not trivial and a financial concern across the segments. Our budget advocacy on behalf of the campuses focuses very heavily on the need for an omnibus deferred maintenance bill to the tune of $5B to support our 29 institutions. It s a huge issue here in Massachusetts. Generally, it is quite rare to see a
10 Michigan Minnesota OHE Minnesota Legislature uses Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement Account (HEAPRA) funding to MnSCU (State Colleges and Universities) and the University of Minnesota for this purpose. as part of a bonding bill that also includes individual new building requests of larger amounts. So option (a) below. The last time the state provided the public universities with deferred maintenance money was separate state operating budget appropriation for any of these types of repairs. It is almost exclusively bond-financed. I reached out to our Executive Budget Officer at Minnesota Management and Budget. They provided me with the information below. Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) is a statutory program that can fund projects at public colleges and universities for: code compliance including health and safety, Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, hazardous material abatement, access improvement, or air quality improvement; building energy efficiency improvements using current best practices; or building or infrastructure repairs necessary to preserve the interior and exterior of existing buildings; or renewal to support the existing programmatic mission of the campuses. This money is appropriated as its own line item but is not specifically earmarked for certain projects. Postsecondary governing boards report their priority projects and then what projects were completed with these funds. Systems are given flexibility to deal with urgent facilities needs that arise. In the 2014 bonding bill the state appropriated $42.5 million in HEAPR funding to the University of Minnesota and $42.5 million to Minnesota State Colleges and
11 Universities. Below is the statute: 135A.046 ASSET PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT. Subdivision 1.Purpose. The legislature recognizes that postsecondary governing boards operate campus physical plants that in number, size, and programmatic use differ significantly from the physical plants operated by state departments and agencies. However, the legislature recognizes the need for standards to aid in categorizing and funding capital projects. The purpose of this section is to provide standards for those higher education projects that are intended to preserve and replace existing campus facilities. Subd. 2.Standards. Capital budget expenditures for Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) projects must be for one or more of the following: code compliance including health and safety, Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, hazardous material abatement, access improvement, or air quality improvement; building energy efficiency improvements using current best practices; or building or infrastructure repairs necessary to preserve the interior and exterior of existing buildings; or renewal to support the existing programmatic mission of the campuses. Up to ten percent of an appropriation awarded under this section may be used for design costs for projects eligible to be funded from this account in anticipation of future funding from the account.
12 Mississippi Missouri Nebraska In Mississippi the legislature appropriates a sum of money each year for repair and renovation. This specific appropriation was started several years ago. While the dollar figure is not large at around 18 million annually, it is an important pocket of money for our universities. The intent was to use this money for R&R and not have to dip into state bonds for this type of facility maintenance. This money is divided between the universities based on square footage of facilities. In Missouri, we would describe our situation as a combination of responses a and c for this request. There is no established process for the ongoing appropriation of funds to address deferred maintenance at public colleges and universities. Maintenance issues, including deferred maintenance, are considered by the legislature to be part of an institution s ongoing operations and, as a consequence, are expected to be addressed through the regular operational budget. In part because the amount of deferred maintenance has become so overwhelming, the legislature recently authorized the sale of bonds, with part of the proceeds designated to assist institutions with repair and renovation of facilities. Most of the projects approved to receive funding from the bond proceeds are designed to address deferred maintenance issues. In Nebraska there is one dedicated funding source for deferred facilities maintenance of university and state college facilities. A portion of the state cigarette tax (currently, $9.2 million) is allocated annually to the Task Force for Building Renewal which is available for fire/life safety, deferred repair, ADA and energy conservation projects at all state-supported facilities. The 309 Task Force reviews institutional/agency Subd. 3.Reporting priorities. Each postsecondary governing board shall establish priorities within its Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement projects. By January 15 of each year, it shall submit to the commissioner of management and budget and to the chairs of the higher education finance divisions, the senate Finance Committee, and the house of representatives Capital Investment Committee a list of the projects that have been paid for with money from a higher education asset preservation and replacement appropriation during the preceding calendar year as well as a list of those priority projects for which Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement appropriations will be sought in that year's legislative session.
13 requests and allocates funding on a project by project basis. In recent years the University of Nebraska and Nebraska State Colleges have received nearly $5 million per year for deferred maintenance projects. Allocations to the 309 Task Force have been fixed at $9.2 million per year since Institutions have been increasingly utilizing operating budget expenditures to supplement limited 309 Task Force funding for deferred repair (averaging $4.2 million in recent years). These funds are in addition to ongoing facilities operating and routine maintenance costs that are also funded from institutional operating budgets. The state (through institutional facilities corporations) also periodically issues longterm bonds to finance renovation/replacement projects that will address deferred maintenance needs in facilities that are funded. This bonding has been financed with equal amount of state appropriations and institutional cash funds (tuition and fees). the 309 Task Force has been in existence since The 309 stands for Legislative Bill 309 which was passed by the Nebraska Unicameral in In the event you have any additional questions regarding the history or mission of the Task Force for Building Renewal Nevada North Dakota We have a very similar program to Virginia here in Nevada. The System receives $15m/ biennium for these type of small dollar deferred maintenance projects. Although with a $1.5 billion backlog, it only slows the speed a bit at which we are losing ground. Institutions often supplement the amounts through other resources available, as necessary. In North Dakota, the biennial budget requests for the public colleges and universities includes separate operating and capital components. Historically, the capital projects could include new construction, major additions/renovations/expansions, etc. Some of the capital projects have been approved to take care of major deferred maintenance issues of a building. In addition, the legislature has appropriated one-time funds for deferred maintenance.either specifically to the campuses, or in a pool at the System Office, to be allocated by the State Board of Higher Education. In all cases, the
14 deferred maintenance appropriations are appropriated as a specific line item in the budgets. Ohio In Ohio, the answer is a ; appropriates funding specifically and separately for major deferred facilities maintenance needs. We accomplish this via our biennial state capital appropriations bill, which makes direct appropriations to our public institutions of higher education from general obligation debt. Oklahoma NO NO YES Oregon Oregon falls under category a. Specifically the State of Oregon appropriate funds specifically and separately for major and minor deferred maintenance needs. It does so in two primary ways: 1. The highest priority in the Oregon Higher Education Coordinating Commission s (HECC) capital request for public universities is funding to all seven public universities for Capital renewal, code compliance, and safety. These funds are allocated to individual universities based on their relative percentage of total education and general square footage and are spent largely on minor deferred maintenance and code compliance projects. Minor being less than full building redevelopment or renovations. For the current biennium, the Oregon Legislature authorized $65,000,000 in state bonded debt for this program, representing more than 25% of the state-backed bonded funds authorized by the Legislature for public universities.[1] 2. For all major capital projects, ten of a possible one hundred points in the HECC s capital scoring and ranking rubric are based whether a project is necessary in order to meet life, safety and code compliance needs of mission critical items, including lifecycle cost analysis or projects that support key programs and initiatives.[2] This focus on deferred maintenance explains why seven of the eleven new public university projects approved by the Oregon Legislature during its 2015 session include significant elements related to addressing deferred maintenance, code compliance or life safety needs. It suffices to say that the bulk of state appropriations for capital were made for either minor or major capital projects. Minor deferred maintenance projects are funded through a formula which allocates available funds, whereas major projects are distributed on a case by case basis. Pennsylvania Pennsylvania s three systems of public postsecondary education are handled differently. The Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education and the State Related Universities do not receive a specific amount for deferred facilities maintenance (c.). The Community Colleges are awarded a fixed sum ($40-50 million) which is separate line item called the Community College Capital Work
15 Group (a, sort of). Community colleges submit proposals for the funds and the money is awarded until it is all awarded. Community Colleges can make capital improvements or perform deferred maintenance with these funds. Rhode Island Per statute, the Rhode Island legislature has set a limit on state expenditures to 98.0% of revenues. The additional 2% goes to the RI Capital Plan Funds which allow the state to procure capital assets as specified in the Budget Appropriations Act each year for specific capital projects in a pay-as-you-go fashion. Many of these are significant renovations or renewal of assets. The colleges and universities are regularly recipients of these specific project funds. There are other specifically appropriated funds that go to each state agency that serve as custodians of various state-owned properties for repairs and deferred maintenance. The public colleges and university are among these agencies. These funds go in the form of block grants to these various agencies who must then submit monthly reports related to the spending of these monies. South Dakota Starting in FY13, the state began to appropriate general funds to assist us in meeting our goal of investing 2% of replacement value into maintenance and repair annually. The annual state appropriation commitment for FY16 is $5.4M compared to the annual student fee investment of $16.7M. FY17 will be year 4 of the 4-year plan, which will bring the state s annual investment to approximately $8.0M, which will get us to our 2% goal. South Dakota is not on a funding formula, but does provide a direct appropriation for maintenance and repair. South Dakota public higher education sets aside 20% of tuition to fund maintenance and repair and to fund capital improvements. Tennessee In short, TN addresses major capital maintenance via option (a), below. This discussion can hinge on how major or deferred maintenance gets defined (e.g. is a 20 year old roof that is scheduled for replacement regular maintenance or deferred maintenance?), but in general TN appropriates in most years anywhere from $20-60 million in major capital maintenance. (For reference TN public higher ed has about 40 million square feet of E&G space). It is specific line-item funding to specified institutions for items such as ADA upgrades, HVAC systems replacements, windows, roofs, etc. This funding stream is distinct from both the capital outlay state funding (new buildings or major building renovations), as well as the routine maintenance and operation (M&O) of a campus, which is a small factor in our outcomes-based formula. This M&O funding is for day to day upkeep of E&G facilities.
16 Texas Utah Texas does not fund specifically for deferred maintenance (DM). DM is considered when allocating Higher Education Funds (HEF) but the funds do not necessarily need to be used for that purpose. See response above. DM is a point of consideration and the institutions are statutorily required to report the amounts to their Governing Boards. The option of a, b, or c does not really fit for Texas. C is probably the closest response if you are tallying choices. c. Among the funding sources available for use by institutions are those that consider DM in the allocation process, but other funds may also be used. The State of Utah has a funding formula for capital improvements defined as remodeling, alteration, replacement, repair project, or site and utility improvement with a total cost of less than $2,500,000. Capital improvements include roof repairs, parking lot re-pavement, boiler/hvac upgrades and replacements, ADA improvements, and fire-suppression upgrades among others. By statute, the Utah Legislature is required to fund 1.1 percent of the replacement value of state owned buildings, including higher education facilities, for capital improvement projects. Replacement value is determined by the State s Division of Risk Management, which provides property insurance for the facilities. Space assigned to auxiliary operations is excluded from the calculation while infrastructure (distribution lines, utility tunnels, hardscapes, etc.) are included in the calculation. The statutory requirement of 1.1 percent includes a clause that enables the Legislature to decrease the percentage to 0.9 percent if statewide revenue deficits occur and to temporarily waive the percentage requirement in the event significant
17 revenue deficits persist. Thus, during the recession beginning in 2008, the Legislature used a portion of the capital improvement funds as a rainy day fund to balance the state budget. The percentage of funding subsequently dropped from 1.1 percent of the replacement value of the buildings to 0.6 percent in The legislature has slowly added back the funding, which returned to the 1.1 percent level in This current year (2015) the legislature appropriated $111.5 million for capital improvements based on replacement values of $10.1 billion. After the Utah Legislature appropriates the money for capital improvement, the State Building Board, which has been designated by statute, allocates the funds to agency and institution improvement projects. Each year higher education institutions and state agencies submit lists of capital improvement project requests to the State Building Board, which then prioritizes projects and allocates funding beginning with lifesafety critical projects and then taking into account an agency s or institution s proportionate share of square feet and facilities. Once allocated, projects are overseen and managed by the State s Division of Facilities and Construction Management with the exception of projects allocated to Utah s two research institutions which have been delegated project management. While the 1.1 percent does not cover all of the capital improvement needs for our colleges and universities, it does provide stable funding for these critical investments.
18 Vermont I am responding to your deferred maintenance funding survey on behalf of the University of Vermont (UVM). The State of Vermont has, for past several years, provided an annual appropriation of about $1.4 million/year for deferred maintenance for UVM. This is the only funding of any kind that the State provides to the University that is designated for facilities. The backlog was $325M as of the most recent estimate last year. We are in process of reducing that amount by $36 million by demolishing a residence hall complex and a physical sciences building. The combined investment for the new residence hall and the new STEM center will be $169M, $26M of which will be gift funding and the rest will be funded entirely by the University. There is no state money for either the STEM Center or the Residence Hall and all of the cost, after gifts, is UVM general obligation debt. The State does not issue bonds on our behalf. Virginia State Council of Higher Education Washington the capital budget here includes appropriations to each public baccalaureate institution and the Comm./Technical College system both for minor works and Preventative Facilities Maintenance and Building System Repairs While Virginia tends to be one of the worst supported states in terms of GF per student we do have a couple very important programs such as Maintenance Reserve and the Higher Education Equipment Trust Fund (both are off-book or off-line so to speak because their financing is not part of the institutions regular budgets) that have made a difference over the last 30 years or so
19 West Virginia Wisconsin Historically, the response for the State of Wisconsin is (a), there is a special biennial capital bonding appropriation available to all state agencies targeted specifically for the maintenance, renovation, and repair of those buildings supported by tax dollars. The University of Wisconsin System is one of the state agencies that traditionally receives these funds. The amount of funding made available to state agencies and targeted to the University of Wisconsin System varies each biennium. The following excerpt summarizes this account: Page 1 of 13 - Wisconsin Department of Administration Page 2 of CAPITAL BUDGET OVERVIEW I. Capital Budget Overview The Capital Budget, also known as the State Building Program, includes the construction of new Read more... "2) All-Agency Projects The All-Agency Program was established to provide funding for the maintenance, repair, and renovation of state facilities and related infrastructure. All-Agency projects help extend the useful life of buildings, correct code deficiencies, improve safety and reliability, and can decrease operating costs. The funding authorizations for the specific categories of work serve as the enumerations for projects in these categories: Facility Maintenance and Repair; Utility Repair and Renovation; Health, Safety, and Environmental Protection; Preventive Maintenance; Programmatic Remodeling and Renovation; Land and Property Acquisition; Capital Equipment Acquisition; and There is no specific mechanism for funding deferred mechanism in our system. Institutions are under a duty to amass reserves of their own to fund these. Occasionally there will be a bond issue or appropriation for specific deferred maintenance with usually a requirement that the institution match the amount. Our current reality this biennium, however, is (c), no new funding was made available in this account. It is unknown at this point if this is the new reality going forward, or if this biennium was an anomaly.
20 Energy Conservation The amount of funding released for a particular project depends upon priority of the work, type of work, and funding availability. All-Agency project funding is not intended to replace operating budget funds, but to maintain and protect the state's investment in its existing infrastructure. State funding will be provided only for those facilities whose construction or acquisition has been approved by the State Building Commission." "2) All-Agency Projects The All-Agency Program was established to provide funding for the maintenance, repair, and renovation of state facilities and related infrastructure. All-Agency projects help extend the useful life of buildings, correct code deficiencies, improve safety and reliability, and can decrease operating costs. The funding authorizations for the specific categories of work serve as the enumerations for projects in these categories: Facility Maintenance and Repair; Utility Repair and Renovation; Health, Safety, and Environmental Protection; Preventive Maintenance; Programmatic Remodeling and Renovation; Land and Property Acquisition; Capital Equipment Acquisition; and Energy Conservation The amount of funding released for a particular project depends upon priority of the work, type of work, and funding availability. All-Agency project funding is not intended to replace operating budget funds, but to maintain and protect the state's investment in its existing infrastructure. State funding will be provided only for those facilities whose construction or acquisition has been approved by the State Building Commission." Wyoming Community College Commission Wyoming includes a separate budget item in the biennial budget for major maintenance for the community colleges and the university. The amount is calculated on building value and then adjusted by a number of factors to reach a total for each sector's proportion of the total amount. This appropriation is separate from the amount provided for operations.
NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FINANCIAL REVIEW Fiscal Year Ending 2010 (with trends since FY 2007) Prepared in March 2011
NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FINANCIAL REVIEW Fiscal Year Ending 2010 (with trends since FY 2007) Prepared in March 2011 As with any large business organization governed by a board, it is essential that
More informationKentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462
TABLE B MEMBERSHIP AND BENEFIT OPERATIONS OF STATE-ADMINISTERED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, LAST MONTH OF FISCAL YEAR: MARCH 2003 Beneficiaries receiving periodic benefit payments Periodic benefit payments
More informationIncome from U.S. Government Obligations
Baird s ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Enclosed is the 2017 Tax Form for your account with
More informationMEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS
MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS Under federal law, states have the option of creating Medicaid buy-in programs that enable employed individuals with disabilities who make more than what is allowed under Section
More informationState Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011
Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/s, 2011 Elderly Handicapped Blind Deaf Disabled FEDERAL Exemption $3,700 $7,400 $3,700 $7,400 $0 $3,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alabama Exemption $1,500 $3,000 $1,500 $3,000
More informationAnnual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care
2017 Cost of Care Home Health Care USA National $18,304 $47,934 $114,400 3% $18,304 $49,192 $125,748 3% Alaska $33,176 $59,488 $73,216 1% $36,608 $63,492 $73,216 2% Alabama $29,744 $38,553 $52,624 1% $29,744
More informationCheckpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources
Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources Alabama Alaska Announcements Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Source Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ( FATCA ) Under Chapter 4 of the Code
More informationTable 1 - Special Fund Disbursements for FY
Table 1 - Special Fund Disbursements for FY 2018-19 Primary Agency Fund Name Available Agriculture Agricultural Conservation Easement $41,617 Racing 62,995 State College Experimental Farm 0 Attorney General
More informationTermination Final Pay Requirements
State Involuntary Termination Voluntary Resignation Vacation Payout Requirement Alabama No specific regulations currently exist. No specific regulations currently exist. if the employer s policy provides
More informationCAPITAL OUTLAY AND/OR DEBT SERVICE
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND/OR DEBT SERVICE Alabama Amount per student adjusted for wealth of LEA as determined by the value of 1 mill of ad valorem tax per student. Alaska State reimburses municipalities up to
More informationThe Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue
FISCAL April 2009 No. 166 FACT The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue By Patrick Fleenor Today the federal cigarette tax will rise from 39 cents to $1.01 per pack. The proceeds
More informationAIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State
3600 Route 66, Mail Stop 4J, Neptune, NJ 07754 AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State As an industry leader in the group insurance benefits market, AIG is firmly
More informationUndocumented Immigrants are:
Immigrants are: Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants Appendix 1: Detailed State and Local Tax Contributions of Total Immigrant Population Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants
More informationSTATE BOND COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY. March 15, 2018
STATE BOND COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY March 15, 2018 1 Overview In accordance with the Comprehensive Capital Outlay Budget, cash lines of credit provide a mechanism to cash flow capital outlay projects
More informationState, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars
State, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars Net Tuition $51.3 Billion 37% All State Support $73.7
More informationState Income Tax Tables
ALABAMA 1 st $1,000... 2% Next 5,000... 4% Over 6,000... 5% ALASKA... 0% ARIZONA 1 1 st $10,000... 2.87% Next 15,000... 3.2% Next 25,000... 3.74% Next 100,000... 4.72% Over 150,000... 5.04% ARKANSAS 1
More informationState Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply
Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Nicholas W. Jenny and Donald J. Boyd The Rockefeller Institute Fiscal News: Vol. 1, No. 3 July 26, 2001 According to a report from the Congressional Budget
More informationMotor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005
The following is a Motor Vehicle Sales/Use Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart which you may find helpful in determining the Sales/Use Tax liability of your customers who either purchase vehicles outside of
More informationImpacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables
THE UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL T H E F R A N K H A W K I N S K E N A N I N S T I T U T E DR. MICHAEL A. STEGMAN, DIRECTOR T 919-962-8201 OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CAPITALISM
More informationProducer ( Distributor ) Commission Schedule
Producer ( Distributor ) Commission Schedule EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2014 General Provisions This schedule is part of your Distributor Agreement with Medico Insurance Company and/or Medico Corp Life
More informationMapping the geography of retirement savings
of savings A comparative analysis of retirement savings data by state based on information gathered from over 60,000 individuals who have used the VoyaCompareMe online tool. Mapping the geography of retirement
More informationUnderstanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income
Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income Senate Interim Committee on Finance and Revenue January 12, 2018 2 Apportioning Corporate Income Apportionment is a method of dividing
More informationPay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions
Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions State Pay Frequency Minimum Final Pay Resign Final Pay Terminated Alabama Bi-weekly or semi-monthly No Provision No Provision Alaska Semi-monthly or monthly Next
More informationSTATE BUDGET UPDATE: SPRING 2012
STATE BUDGET UPDATE: SPRING 2012 (Condensed Free Version) Fiscal Affairs Program National Conference of State Legislatures William T. Pound, Executive Director 7700 East First Place Denver, CO 80230 (303)
More informationThe table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *
State Minimum Wages The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. Summary: As of Jan. 1, 2014, 21 states and D.C. have minimum wages above the federal minimum
More informationAmerican Economics Group Clear and Effective Economic Analysis. American Economics Group
Presentation for: Federation Clear of and Tax Effective Administrators Economic Analysis 9/22/03 Charles W. de Seve, Ph.D. www.americaneconomics.com The Economy is Recovering : The National Economic Setting
More informationAbility-to-Repay Statutes
Ability-to-Repay Statutes FEDERAL ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA STATUTE Truth in Lending, Regulation Z Consumer Credit Secure and Fair Enforcement for Bankers, Brokers, and Loan Originators
More informationMedia Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data
Contact Information Below Media Alert First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data First American CoreLogic, the first company to develop a national, state and city-level negative equity report,
More informationThe Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro
The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees Robert J. Shapiro October 1, 2013 The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects
More informationState Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey
444 N. Capitol Street NW, Suite 142, Washington, DC 20001 202-434-8020 fax 202-434-8033 www.workforceatm.org State Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE WORKFORCE AGENCIES April
More informationTHE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
THE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Richard Hemp, Mary Kay Rizzolo, Shea Tanis, & David Braddock Universities of Colorado and Illinois-Chicago REINVENTING QUALITY CONFERENCE BALTIMORE,
More informationPAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS
PAY MENT 2017 PAY MENT Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia No generally applicable wage payment law for private employers. Rate
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21071 Updated February 15, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Medicaid Expenditures, FY2002 and FY2003 Summary Karen L. Tritz Analyst in Social Legislation Domestic
More informationSales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State
Thanks to R&M Consulting for assistance in putting this together Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Filing Thresholds
More informationQ Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010
Q1 2010 Homeowner Confidence Survey Results May 20, 2010 The Zillow Homeowner Confidence Survey is fielded quarterly to determine the confidence level of American homeowners when it comes to the value
More informationTANF FUNDS MAY BE USED TO CREATE OR EXPAND REFUNDABLE STATE CHILD CARE TAX CREDITS
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org http://www.cbpp.org October 11, 2000 TANF FUNDS MAY BE USED TO CREATE OR EXPAND REFUNDABLE STATE
More informationUnion Members in New York and New Jersey 2018
For Release: Friday, March 29, 2019 19-528-NEW NEW YORK NEW JERSEY INFORMATION OFFICE: New York City, N.Y. Technical information: (646) 264-3600 BLSinfoNY@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/new-york-new-jersey
More informationChild Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016
Policy solutions that work for low-income people Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016 i Background The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) is the primary federal funding
More informationCapital Budgeting in the States
Capital Budgeting in the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO North Carolina Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Capital Improvements February 10, 2016 2 Current Economic and
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents
NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE CLEARING CORPORATION COMPENSATION DE PRODUITS DÉRIVÉS NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2002-013 January 28, 2002 Trading by U.S. Residents This is
More informationTA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17
TA X FACTS 2O17 Northern Funds Tax Facts provides specific information about your Northern Funds investment income and capital gain distributions for 2017. If you have any questions about how to apply
More informationNotice on Reallotment of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Title I Formula Allotted Funds
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/14/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-11045, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training
More informationIMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION The following information about your enclosed 1099-DIV from s should be used when preparing your 2017 tax return. Form 1099-DIV reports dividends, exempt-interest dividends, capital
More informationBudgeting for Higher Education: Fundamental Issues and the United States Experience
Budgeting for Higher Education: Fundamental Issues and the United States Experience Paul E. Lingenfelter and Hans P. L Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 2008 1 Overview of U.S. Higher
More informationFederal Rates and Limits
Federal s and Limits FICA Social Security (OASDI) Base $118,500 Medicare (HI) Base No Limit Social Security (OASDI) Percentage 6.20% Medicare (HI) Percentage Maximum Employee Social Security (OASDI) Withholding
More informationRevenue Forecasting Practices: Accuracy, Transparency and Political Acceptance
September 28, 2017 Center for and Local Finance Revenue Forecasting Practices: Accuracy, Transparency and Political Acceptance 2 Why is revenue forecasting important? In a balanced budget environment,
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS21071 Medicaid Expenditures, FY2003 and FY2004 Karen Tritz, Domestic Social Policy Division January 17, 2006 Abstract.
More informationAiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.
Aiming Higher Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance Edition Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L. Hayes December The COMMONWEALTH FUND overview On most of the indicators,
More informationFederal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I
Federal Registry NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report 2012 Quarter I Updated June 6, 2012 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Federal
More informationNCSL Midwest States Fiscal Leaders Forum. March 10, 2017
NCSL Midwest States Fiscal Leaders Forum March 10, 2017 Public Pensions: 50-State Overview David Draine, Senior Officer Public Sector Retirement Systems Project The Pew Charitable Trusts More than 40 active,
More informationTools for State Transformation: To Waiver or Not?
1 Tools for State Transformation: To Waiver or Not? Prepared for the National Conference of State Legislatures December 8, 2015 By Cindy Mann Agenda 2 Background 1115 Waivers 1332 Waivers & Coordinated
More informationRecourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO
Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO State Relevant Agency Contact Information Online Resources Online Filing Alabama Department
More informationCAPITOL research. States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Recovery Act Expires. health
CAPITOL research MAR health States Face Medicaid Match Loss After Expires Summary Medicaid, the largest health insurance program in the nation, is jointly financed by state and federal governments. The
More informationUpdate: 50-State Survey of Retiree Health Care Liabilities Most recent data show changes to benefits, funding policies could help manage rising costs
A fact sheet from Dec 2018 Update: 50-State Survey of Retiree Health Care Liabilities Most recent data show changes to benefits, funding policies could help manage rising costs Getty Images Overview States
More informationCassidy-Graham Plan s Damaging Cuts to Health Care Funding Would Grow Dramatically in 2027
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org September 15, 2017 Cassidy-Graham Plan s Damaging Cuts to Health Care Funding Would
More informationProperty Taxation of Business Personal Property
Taxation of Business Personal Evaluate the property tax as it applies to business personal property and the current $500 exemption. Quantify the economic effect of taxing business personal property and
More informationEconomic Impacts of Wait Times for Commercial Driver s Licenses Skills Tests
Economic Impacts of Wait Times for Commercial Driver s Licenses Skills Tests Nam D. Pham, Ph.D. Mary Donovan January 2019 Economic Impact of Wait Times for Commercial Driver s Licenses Skills Tests Nam
More informationNation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016
Nation s Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 by Joan Alker and Olivia Pham The number of uninsured children nationwide dropped to another historic low in 2016 with approximately 250,000
More informationCLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State
CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State Estimating the Annual Amounts of Unemployment Insurance Tax Collections From Individual States for Financing Adult Basic Education/ Job Training Programs
More informationRequired Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity
Completion Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California State Certification: must complete initial 16 hours (8 hrs of general LTC CE and 8 hrs of classroom-only CE specifically on the CA for LTC prior to
More informationWeatherization Assistance Program PY 2016 Funding Report
PY 2016 Summary... 1 Background................................................................ 1 Funding Sources... 2 Funding Trends... 3 Production Summary... 4 Funding Future... 4 Weatherization Leveraged
More informationHow Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Updated February 8, 2017 How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Cost in Fiscal Year?
More informationState Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income
State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income The following chart Provides a general overview of how states treat income from Social Security and pensions for the 2016 tax year unless otherwise
More informationJanuary 30, Firefighter s Cancer Presumption S-716
1 January 30, 2018 Firefighter s Cancer Presumption S-716 The MEL is committed to work with other concerned parties to pass legislation that protects the firefighters while balancing the fiscal realities
More informationInterest Table 01/04/2010
The following table provides information on the interest charged by each of the 50 states and its territories: FOR THE UNITED S AND TERRITORIES Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
More informationState Bond Financing in Oregon JACK KENNY CAPITAL FINANCE MANAGER
State Bond Financing in Oregon JACK KENNY CAPITAL FINANCE MANAGER Presentation Outline Background on Bond Financing in Oregon The Municipal Bond Market Generally Structure of the Bond Bill 2 Background
More informationState Social Security Income Pension Income State computation not based on federal. Social Security benefits excluded from taxable income.
State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income The following CCH analysisi provides a general overview of how states treat income from Social Security and pensions for the 2013 tax year unless
More informationNCSL FISCAL BRIEF: PROJECTED STATE TAX GROWTH IN FY 2012 AND BEYOND
NCSL FISCAL BRIEF: PROJECTED STATE TAX GROWTH IN FY 2012 AND BEYOND December 6, 2011 Fiscal year (FY) 2012 marks the second consecutive year state officials are forecasting state tax growth compared with
More informationChapter D State and Local Governments
Chapter D State and Local Governments State and Local Governments contains detailed information on the taxes, revenues, and expenditures of states and localities. The public finances of these two levels
More informationNORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FINANCIAL REVIEW Fiscal Year Ending 2014 (with trends since FY2011) March 2015
NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FINANCIAL REVIEW Fiscal Year Ending 2014 (with trends since FY2011) March 2015 The central purpose and use of the information in this report is to provide the board with
More informationAetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule
Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule Cards Issued Broker Rate Broker Tier Per Year 1st Yr 2nd Yr 3+ Yrs Levels 11-Jan 4.00% 4.00% 3.00% Bronze 24-Dec 6.00% 4.00% 3.00% Silver 25-49 8.00% 4.00%
More informationTax Recommendations and Actions in Other States. Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011
Tax Recommendations and Actions in Other States Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011 Governors FY 2012 Recommendations 12 governors recommend net revenue (tax and fee) increases 12 governors
More informationProviding Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University
Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University FICO Scores: Identifying Subprime Consumers Category FICO Score Range Super-prime 740 and Higher
More informationATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities
Rates Effective August 8, 05 ATHE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities State Availability Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Product Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire California PE New Jersey
More informationSECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance
SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the agencies)
More informationSTATE BUDGET DEFICITS PROJECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR By Nicholas Johnson and Bob Zahradnik
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised February 6, 2004 STATE BUDGET DEFICITS PROJECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005 By Nicholas
More informationUnclaimed Property Legislative Trends and Highlights
Unclaimed Property Legislative Trends and Highlights 2013-2014 2014 NAST Treasury Management Training Symposium E. Suzanne Darling, Esq., Vice President, Xerox 2014 Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved.
More informationHAC USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY. Rural Research Report. Housing Assistance Council FISCAL YEAR 2017 YEAR-END REPORT
USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY FISCAL YEAR 217 YEAR-END REPORT HAC Rural Research Report Since the 195s. the United States Department of Agriculture has financed the construction, repair, and
More informationSTATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE
STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE The table below, created by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), reflects current state minimum wages in effect as of January 1, 2017, as
More informationSTATE BUDGET TROUBLES WORSEN By Elizabeth McNichol and Iris J. Lav
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Updated May 18, 2009 STATE BUDGET TROUBLES WORSEN By Elizabeth McNichol and Iris J.
More informationMINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013
WEST INFORMATION OFFICE San Francisco, Calif. For release Wednesday, June 25, 2014 14-898-SAN Technical information: (415) 625-2282 BLSInfoSF@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ro9 Media contact: (415) 625-2270 MINIMUM
More informationFingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements
Updates to the State Specific Information Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic)
More informationRAINY DAY FUNDS: OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFORM. By Robert Zahradnik
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org March 9, 2005 RAINY DAY FUNDS: OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFORM By Robert Zahradnik Summary
More informationDFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018
DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018 Supplementary Tax Information 2017 The following supplementary information may be useful in
More information2017 BUDGET. Budget Hearing: October 10, 2016 Budget Adoption: October 24, 2016
2017 BUDGET Budget Hearing: October 10, 2016 Budget Adoption: October 24, 2016 THE FIVE THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EVERY PUBLIC BUDGET: 1. How much do we propose to spend and on what would we spend
More information(In effect as of January 1, 2006*) TABLE 17. OFFSET PROVISIONS IN STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS
(In effect as of January 1, 2006*) TABLE 17. OFFSET PROVISIONS IN STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS ALASKA Section 23.30.224--When public employees receive total disability compensation, compensation is
More informationSTATE TAX WITHHOLDING GUIDELINES
STATE TAX WITHHOLDING GUIDELINES ( Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. and Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (hereafter collectively referred to as Company )) (Last Updated 11/2/215) state
More informationResidual Income Requirements
Residual Income Requirements ytzhxrnmwlzh Ch. 4, 9-e: Item 44, Balance Available for Family Support (04/10/09) Enter the appropriate residual income amount from the following tables in the guideline box.
More informationTHE HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP 2017
TOTAL US $38,597,642,593 $47,648,609,571 123.4 The Index (2 nd Series) indicates the extent to which the has increased between the base year and the current year. In the total United States this Index
More informationMetrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans. November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis
Metrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis Fiscal Sustainability Metrics Net Amortization Measures whether contributions are sufficient to reduce pension debt if plan
More informationLong-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide
Long-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide Version Sept. 12, 2012 M28108 Contents LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW & TRAINING REQUIREMENTS GUIDE Long-Term Care Partnership Overview...4
More informationMutual Fund Tax Information
2008 Mutual Fund Tax Information We have provided this information as a service to our shareholders. Thornburg Investment Management cannot and does not give tax or accounting advice. If you have further
More informationWHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE
FEBRUARY 2018 WHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE MARY KATE HOPKINS, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL AFFAIRS, AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ALAN NGUYEN, SENIOR POLICY ADVISER, FREEDOM
More informationBudget Uncertainty in Medicaid. Federal Funds Information for States
Budget Uncertainty in Medicaid Federal Funds Information for States www.ffis.org NCSL Legislative Summit August 2017 CHIP Funding State Flexibility DSH Cuts Uncertainty Block Grant ACA Expansion Per Capita
More informationMutual Fund Tax Information
Mutual Fund Tax Information We have provided this information as a service to our shareholders. Thornburg Investment Management cannot and does not give tax or accounting advice. If you have further questions
More informationSTATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States INDEPENDENT FISCAL OFFICE FEBRUARY 2018 Methodology This report uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the U.S. Bureau
More informationCAPITAL OUTLAY AND/OR DEBT SERVICE
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND/OR DEBT SERVICE Alabama Amount per student adjusted for wealth of LEA as determined by the value of 1 mill of ad valorem tax per student. Alaska State reimburses municipalities up to
More information2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER
2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which applies to most employers, establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for the private
More information2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes
2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes Dear Valued ADP Client, Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2012, you and your employees may notice changes in your paychecks due to updated 2012
More informationSTATEMENT OF. Exploring Alternative Solutions on the Internet Sales Tax Issue
STATEMENT OF SENATOR SHARON WESTON BROOME, LOUISIANA SENATOR DEB PETERS, SOUTH DAKOTA CO-CHAIRS, NCSL STEERING COMMITTEE ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES REGARDING Exploring Alternative
More information