Step 5: Recognize Revenue When (or as) the Entity Satisfied a Performance Obligation
|
|
- Brianna Peters
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 February 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Aerospace and Defense Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #1-5: Transfer of Control on Non-US Federal Government Contracts Issue #1-5 was finalized in June 2016 and is included in the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide: Revenue Recognition, in paragraphs of the Aerospace & Defense Entities Chapter. Further clarification was requested on whether a contract priced at a loss could qualify for over time recognition in accordance with FASB ASC (c). The AICPA is seeking feedback on the revised wording shown as marked changes in paragraphs by April 2, Wording to be Included in the Revenue Recognition Guide: Step 5: Recognize Revenue When (or as) the Entity Satisfied a Performance Obligation Satisfaction of Performance Obligations Transfer of Control on Non-U.S. Federal Government Contracts This Accounting Implementation Issue Is Relevant to Step 5: "Recognize Revenue When (or as) the Entity Satisfied a Performance Obligation," of FASB ASC Commercial aerospace and defense contracts encompass many different types of transactions: manufacturing of standardized products; rendering of services, such as maintenance or training, or construction-type contracts to design, develop, manufacture, or modify complex aerospace or electronic equipment to a buyer's specification FASB ASC states the following: An entity shall recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service (that is, an asset) to a customer. An asset is transferred when (or as) the customer obtains control of that asset FASB ASC 606 explains that revenue should be recognized when (or as) an entity satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control of a good or service to a customer. Control of a good or service can transfer over time or at a point in time. If a performance obligation is satisfied over time,
2 revenue allocated to that performance obligation will be recognized over time. FASB ASC explains that if a performance obligation does not meet the criteria to be satisfied over time, it is deemed to be satisfied at a point in time Aerospace and defense companies should determine whether a performance obligation meets the criteria to be satisfied over time or if satisfaction occurs at a point in time. As noted in FASB ASC , this assessment is performed at contract inception and may only be revised during the contract in the event of certain contract modifications, for instance, change to rights to payment, change to contract scope that affects the alternative use of the assets being produced, and so on. Performance Obligations Satisfied Over Time FASB ASC states that An entity transfers control of a good or service over time and, therefore, satisfies a performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time if one of the following criteria is met: a. The customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the entity s performance as the entity performs; b. The entity s performance creates or enhances an asset (for example, work in process) that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced; c. The entity s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date Aerospace and defense entities will need to examine at contract inception the facts and circumstances to determine whether performance obligations in aerospace and defense contracts meet any of the criteria in FASB ASC Simultaneous Receipt and Consumption of the Benefits of the Entity s Performance Assessing the criterion in FASB ASC a can be straightforward as explained in FASB ASC for routine or recurring services or situations in which the entity s performance is immediately consumed by the customer. FASB ASC also notes that the criterion in FASB ASC a could be met if an entity determines that another entity would not need to substantially reperform the work that the entity has completed to date, if that other entity were to fulfill the remaining performance obligation to the customer. FinREC believes that this criterion is likely to be relevant for certain commercial aerospace and defense service performance obligations, such as maintenance, training or transportation services. Customer Controls the Asset As It Is Created or Enhanced The criterion in FASB ASC b addresses situations in which the customer controls any work in process, either tangible or intangible, as it is created or enhanced FASB ASC states the following: Control of an asset refers to the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset. Control includes the ability to prevent other entities from directing the use of, and obtaining the benefits from, an asset. The benefits of an asset are the potential cash flows (inflows or savings in outflows) that can be obtained directly or indirectly in many ways, such as by: a. Using the asset to produce goods or provide services (including public services) b. Using the asset to enhance the value of other assets
3 c. Using the asset to settle liabilities or reduce expenses d. Selling or exchanging the asset e. Pledging the asset to secure a loan f. Holding the asset Judgment will be required to determine if control of the asset transfers to the customer while the asset is being created or enhanced. Aerospace and defense contracts in which the entity performs on or enhances the customer s asset may transfer control to the customer over time. Management should analyze the contract s terms and conditions and other facts and circumstances to determine, for example, if the entity has a right to payment for its performance to date, if the legal title, physical possession, or risks and rewards of ownership related to the asset pass to the customer as the asset is created or enhanced, if the customer accepts the asset as it is created or enhanced, or if the customer controls the underlying land or asset that the entity is enhancing. Entity s Performance Does Not Create an Asset With an Alternative Use The criterion in FASB ASC c includes both the assessment of whether the entity s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the entity and whether the entity has an enforceable right of payment for performance completed to date As discussed in BC134 of FASB ASU No , when the asset has an alternative use to the entity, the customer does not control the asset as it is being created. This is expected to be the case in standard inventory-type items for which the entity has the discretion to substitute items or units across different contracts with customers Some assets, such as commercial aircrafts or engines and components and parts to that equipment, may be less customized when manufactured under non-u.s. government contracts than assets produced under U.S. government contracts. However, BC137 of FASB ASU No explains that the level of customization is not the only criterion to determine whether the asset has an alternative use. As stated in FASB ASC , "an asset created by an entity s performance does not have an alternative use to an entity if the entity is either restricted contractually from readily directing the asset for another use during the creation or enhancement of that asset or limited practically from readily directing the asset in its completed state for another use. An example would be if the entity cannot sell the asset to another customer without significant rework As discussed in FASB ASC , assessment of the "no alternative use" criteria should be made assuming the contract with its customer is not terminated In accordance with FASB ASC , an entity should also consider at contract inception the characteristics of the asset in its complete form because it will ultimately transfer to the customer. BC136 of FASB ASU No provides the example of an asset that has the same basic design as many other assets that the entity sells to other customers. However, customization is substantial and would prevent the entity from redirecting the asset in its complete state to another customer without significant rework. Although the asset may likely have an alternative use to the entity in the early stage of its manufacturing process, (that is before customization activities start), the entity should conclude from inception that the asset has no alternative use FASB ASC states that "a practical limitation on an entity s ability to direct an asset for another use exists if an entity would incur significant economic losses to direct the asset for another use." FinREC believes that situations that may create practical limitations include, but are not limited to, significant level of customization and rework necessary to redirect the asset to another use, resale at a significant loss, limited production slots that may limit the capability of the entity to redirect the asset while still meeting its obligations (such as contractual deadlines) under the contract with the customer, and the asset is located in a remote location where significant transportation costs would be incurred to redirect the asset for another use.
4 As stated in FASB ASC , "a contractual restriction on an entity s ability to direct an asset for another use must be substantive for the asset not to have an alternative use to the entity." For instance, if a contract prevents the entity from substituting the asset for another asset, but, in practice, the entity manufactures other similar assets and those assets are interchangeable, have no serial number or other way of being individually identified, and the entity would not incur significant costs by substituting the asset, the contractual clause would likely be assessed as non-substantive. When assessing whether a contractual restriction confers a "non-alternative use" to the asset, the entity should consider whether the contractual restriction represents only a protective right to the customer and whether the customer could enforce its rights to the promised asset. As discussed in BC138 of FASB ASU No , a protective right typically results in the entity having the practical ability to physically substitute or redirect the asset without the customer being aware of or objecting to the change. Enforceable Right to Payment for Performance Completed to Date When the asset created has no alternative use to the entity, the entity still needs to demonstrate it has an "enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date" in order to satisfy the criteria in FASB ASC c and meet the requirements to conclude that satisfaction of a performance obligation and revenue should be recognized over time. Both of the criteria in FASB ASC c need to be met; a right to payment for performance to date alone does not, in itself, demonstrate that control has transferred As per FASB ASC , the entity needs to demonstrate that if the contract was to be terminated early for reasons other than the entity s failure to perform as promised, it would be entitled to an amount that compensates the entity for its performance to date. An amount that would compensate an entity for performance completed to date would be an amount that approximates the selling price of the goods or services transferred to date rather than compensation for only the entity s potential loss of profit if the contract were to be terminated. For example, an entity could evidence an enforceable right to payment based on the ability to recover the costs incurred to date in satisfying the performance obligation plus a reasonable profit margin. In this case, the entity needs to demonstrate that the margin recovered for the goods or services transferred to date represents a reasonable margin. Significant judgment will be required, particularly in circumstances in which the entity is entitled to a margin that is proportionally lower than the one it would expect to obtain if the contract is completed Although it would generally be expected that entities would price their contracts to obtain a reasonable profit, there are circumstances in which an entity would be willing to sell a good or service at a loss. For example, an entity might be willing to incur a loss on a sale if it has a strong expectation of obtaining a profit on future orders from that customer, even though such orders are not contractually guaranteed. The objective of the right to payment criterion in FASB ASC (c) as described in BC142 of FASB ASU is to assess whether the customer is obligated to pay for performance to date. Compensation for the entity s performance for a contract negotiated at a loss, is an amount that is less than the entity s costs. FinREC believes the principle for assessing the enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date as described in FASB ASC (c) is based on whether the entity has a right to an amount that approximates the selling price; therefore, an entity does not need to have a profit in order to meet this criterion. Accordingly, FinREC believes certain contracts priced at a loss may qualify for over time recognition under FASB ASC (c) if the enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date is based on the selling price which may not contain a profit. This section does not address or change the requirements for when an entity would be required to record a loss accrual related to a contract Under the termination for convenience clause in most U.S. federal government contracts, the government typically has a right to the goods or work in progress produced, and the contractor is entitled to payment for its performance to date if the contract is terminated early for reasons other than default. Non-U.S. federal government contracts may operate under different terms.
5 As described in FASB ASC , management should analyze the terms and conditions of the contract as well as any laws that govern the transaction in order to determine if the entity s performance gives rise to an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date at any given time. Legal precedents as well as customary business practices should also be considered in case they alter the capacity of the entity to enforce their right to payment The following example is meant to be illustrative, of when a contract negotiated at a loss at inception meets the criteria for satisfaction of performance obligations over time. The actual determination of whether the performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in times should be based on facts and circumstances of an entity s specific situation. Example 1 A Country (the customer) puts out a request for bids for the design of a highly customized defense system. Country expects to award subsequent contracts for tens of thousands of systems over the next ten years from whoever wins the design contract. There are four contractors bidding for this contract. Contractor A is aware of the competition and knows that in order to win the design contract they must bid it at a loss. Contractor A is willing to bid the design contract at a loss due to the significant value in expected orders over the next ten years. Contractor A wins the contract with a value of $100 and estimated costs to complete of $130. The contract is noncancellable; however, the contract terms stipulate that if Country attempts to terminate the contract, Contractor A would be entitled to payment for work done to date. The payment amount would be equal to a proportional amount of the price of the contract based upon the performance of work done to date. For example, if the Contract Value was $100 and the estimated total cost was $130, at the termination date, if Contractor A was 50% complete or had incurred $65 of costs, it would be entitled to a $50 payment from Country. For the purposes of this example, Contractor A has determined the contract contains a single performance obligation and performance of work is done ratably over the contract period. Contractor A has also determined that its performance does not create an asset with an alternative use due to the highly customized design of the defense system. Thus, the conclusion regarding whether Contractor A has an enforceable right to payment will determine whether revenue should be recognized over time or at a point in time. This example does not address or change the requirements as to whether Contractor A would be required to record a loss accrual related to the contract. In this example, Contractor A has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date in accordance with paragraph FABS ASC (c) because it is entitled to receive a proportionate amount of the contract price in the event Country terminates the agreement. FASB ASC refers to an amount that approximates the selling price of the goods or services transferred to date and cites cost plus a reasonable profit margin as an example of an amount that would represent selling price for performance completed to date. Compensation for the entity s performance in this example, as negotiated by the parties, is an amount that is less than the entity s costs. Therefore, in this example, the analysis is focused on whether the entity has a right to a proportionate amount of the selling price (reflecting performance to date) rather than solely based on whether such amount is greater than or less than the entity s costs to fulfill the contract. Comments on paragraphs should be received by April 2, 2018, and sent by electronic mail to Kim Kushmerick at kim.kushmerick@aicpa-cima.com, or you can send them by mail to Kim Kushmerick, Accounting Standards, AICPA, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, NY
6 DISCLAIMER: This publication has not been approved, disapproved or otherwise acted upon by any senior committees of, and does not represent an official position of, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. It is distributed with the understanding that the contributing authors and editors, and the publisher, are not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services in this publication. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Copyright 2016 by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY All rights reserved. For information about the procedure for requesting permission to make copies of any part of this work, please copyright@aicpa.org with your request. Otherwise, requests should be written and mailed to the Permissions Department, AICPA, 220 Leigh Farm Road, Durham, NC
Working Draft: Software Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
February 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Software Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #14-7: Significant Financing Components in Software Arrangements Expected
More informationWorking Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
December 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #15-6 Impact of enforceable rights and obligations on contract
More informationWorking Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
November 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #3-4: Underwriting Revenues Expected Overall Level of Impact
More informationWorking Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
January 2, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #3-2: Selling and Distribution Fee Revenue Expected Overall Level
More informationWorking Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
December 15, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #3-5: Investment Banking M&A Advisory Fees Expected Overall
More informationWorking Draft: Not-for-Profit Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
December 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Not-for-Profit Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #11-5: Not-for-Profit Subscriptions and Membership Dues Expected
More information3. This paper focuses on extended warranty contracts, not written by an insurance entity, that meet the criteria in FASB ASC
February 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Accounting for Third Party Extended Service Warranty Contracts (Applicable to Non- Insurance Entities) - Revenue Recognition
More informationWorking Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
February 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #6-13 Disclosures Contract with Customers Expected Overall Level of
More informationWorking Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
May 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #15-3 Contract Modifications Expected Overall Level of Impact
More informationWorking Draft: Allowance for Credit Losses Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Credit Losses
October 30, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Credit Losses Working Draft: Allowance for Credit Losses Implementation Issue Issue #6: Reasonable and Supportable Forecast Developing the Period and Use of
More informationRevenue Recognition (Topic 605)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update (Revised) Issued: November 14, 2011 and January 4, 2012 Comments Due: March 13, 2012 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Revenue from Contracts with Customers (including
More informationKey Differences Between ASC (Formerly SOP 81-1) and ASC 606
Aerospace & Defense Spotlight February 2019 Key Differences Between ASC 605-35 (Formerly SOP 81-1) and ASC 606 The Bottom Line In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB
More informationWorking Draft: Health Care Entities Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
October 2, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Health Care Entities Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #8-9 Risk Sharing Arrangements Expected Overall Level of
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
R International Financial Reporting Standard 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers IFRS 15 In April 2001 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) adopted IAS 11 Construction Contracts and
More informationRevenue for the aerospace and defense industry
Revenue for the aerospace and defense industry The new standard s effective date is coming. US GAAP December 2016 kpmg.com/us/frn b Revenue for the aerospace and defense industry Revenue viewed through
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-27 25 August 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects engineering and construction entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Identifying performance obligations
More informationRevenue for the engineering and construction industry
Revenue for the engineering and construction industry The new standard s effective date is coming. US GAAP December 2016 kpmg.com/us/frn b Revenue for the engineering and construction industry Revenue
More informationASSURANCE AND ACCOUNTING ASPE IFRS: A Comparison Revenue
ASSURANCE AND ACCOUNTING ASPE IFRS: A Comparison Revenue In this publication we will examine the key differences between Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) and International Financial
More informationChanges to revenue recognition in the health care industry
Changes to revenue recognition in the health care industry Prepared by: Dan Vandenberghe, Partner, RSM US LLP dan.vandenberghe@rsmus.com, +1 612 376 9267 Jay Adkisson, Partner, RSM US LLP jay.adkisson@rsmus.com,
More informationRevenue From Contracts With Customers
September 2017 Revenue From Contracts With Customers Understanding and Implementing the New Rules An article by Scott Lehman, CPA, and Alex J. Wodka, CPA Audit / Tax / Advisory / Risk / Performance Smart
More informationAerospace & Defense Spotlight The Converged Revenue Recognition Model Has Landed
September 2014 Aerospace & Defense Spotlight The Converged Revenue Recognition Model Has Landed In This Issue: Background Key Accounting Issues Effective Date and Transition Challenges for A&D Entities
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers: The Final Standard
Revenue from Contracts with Customers: The Final Standard 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and effective date.... 3 Key provisions of the standard.... 3 Transition.... 12 Planning.... 13 How Experis Finance
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
International Financial Reporting Standard 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers In April 2001 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) adopted IAS 11 Construction Contracts and IAS 18 Revenue,
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model
Revenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model No. US2014-01 (supplement) July 16, 2014 What s inside: Overview... 1 Identifying performance obligations...
More informationSri Lanka Accounting Standard SLFRS 15. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Sri Lanka Accounting Standard SLFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers CONTENTS SRI LANKA ACCOUNTING STANDARD SLFRS 15 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS paragraphs OBJECTIVE 1 Meeting the objective
More informationThe new revenue recognition standard - software and cloud services
Applying IFRS in Software and Cloud Services The new revenue recognition standard - software and cloud services January 2015 Overview Software entities may need to change their revenue recognition policies
More informationImplementing IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers A practical guide to implementation issues for the aerospace and defence industry
Implementing IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers A practical guide to implementation issues for the aerospace and defence industry Contents About this guide 1 Overview 2 Scope and core principle
More informationDelegations will find attached document D044460/01 Annex 1.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 April 2016 (OR. en) 8024/16 ADD 1 DRS 8 ECOFIN 299 EF 88 COVER NOTE From: To: European Commission No. Cion doc.: D044460/01 Subject: General Secretariat of the
More informationNARUC: REVENUE RECOGNITION JULIE PETIT AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER BRIAN JONES AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 TH, 2017
NARUC: REVENUE RECOGNITION JULIE PETIT AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER BRIAN JONES AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 TH, 2017 Mazars USA LLP is an independent member firm of Mazars Group. Mazars USA LLP is
More informationImplementing IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers A practical guide to implementation issues for the travel, hospitality and leisure sector
Implementing IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers A practical guide to implementation issues for the travel, hospitality and leisure sector GAAP: Clear vision Contents About this guide 1 Overview
More informationASC 606 REVENUE RECOGNITION. Everything you need to know now
ASC 606 REVENUE RECOGNITION Everything you need to know now TOPICS 03 04 07 14 21 31 39 48 54 57 61 66 67 Introduction A revenue recognition primer Identifying the contract Identifying performance obligations
More information(Text with EEA relevance)
29.10.2016 L 295/19 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2016/1905 of 22 September 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC)
More informationRevenue Recognition (Topic 605)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: June 24, 2010 Comments Due: October 22, 2010 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Revenue from Contracts with Customers This Exposure Draft of a proposed Accounting
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
Grant Thornton August 2017 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Navigating the guidance in ASC 606 and ASC 340-40 This publication was created for general information purposes, and does not constitute
More informationACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD RESEARCH PAPER IMPACT OF IFRS 15 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS ON REVENUE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
Attachment 8(b) ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD RESEARCH PAPER IMPACT OF IFRS 15 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS ON REVENUE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR Issued by the Board March 2015 The Chief Executive Officer
More informationQUICK REFERENCE GUIDE TO VALUING ASSETS IN BUSINESS COMBINATIONS. Quick Reference Guide to Valuing Assets in Business Combinations
QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE TO VALUING ASSETS IN BUSINESS COMBINATIONS Quick Reference Guide to Valuing Assets in Business Combinations Overview of ASC 805: Business Combinations Acquisition Method and Business
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model
No. 2014-02 (supplement) 16 July 2014 What s inside: Overview... 1 Determining the unit of account... 2 Variable consideration and the constraint on revenue recognition..8 Significant financing components...
More informationNew revenue guidance Implementation in Industrial Products
No. US2017-16 August 17, 2017 What s inside: Overview... 1 Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer... 2 Step 2: Identify performance obligations... 4 Step 3: Determine... 5 Step 4: Allocate...8
More informationPwC ReportingPerspectives July 2018
July 2018 Table of contents Topic Page no. 4 24 37 40 43 2 PwC Editorial We are pleased to bring you the 15th edition of our quarterly newsletter covering the latest developments in financial reporting
More informationREVENUE RELATED TO ORDINARY ACTIVITIES ACCORDING TO IFRS AND ROMANIAN REGULATIONS
REVENUE RELATED TO ORDINARY ACTIVITIES ACCORDING TO IFRS AND ROMANIAN REGULATIONS ECOBICI NICOLAE ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PHD, CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI UNIVERSITY OF TARGU JIU e-mail: nycu2004ro@yahoo.com Abstract
More informationFile Reference No Exposure Draft of a Proposed Accounting Standard Update - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
March 13, 2012 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 Norwalk, Connecticut 06856-5116 United States of America International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London
More informationLife Sciences Accounting and Financial Reporting Update Interpretive Guidance on Revenue Recognition Under ASC 606
Life Sciences Accounting and Financial Reporting Update Interpretive Guidance on Revenue Recognition Under ASC 606 March 2017 Revenue Recognition Background In May 2014, the FASB 1 and IASB issued their
More information3. This paper does not include any staff recommendations and the Boards will not be asked to make any technical decisions at this meeting.
IASB Agenda ref 7A STAFF PAPER 21-25 May 2012 FASB IASB Meeting Project Paper topic Revenue recognition Feedback summary from comment letters and outreach CONTACT(S) Allison McManus amcmanus@ifrs.org +44
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2016-26 27 July 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue recognition standard affects automotive OEMs In this issue: Overview... 1 Vehicle sales... 2 Sales incentives... 2 Free goods
More informationFinancial reporting developments. The road to convergence: the revenue recognition proposal
Financial reporting developments The road to convergence: the revenue recognition proposal August 2010 To our clients and To our clients and other friends The Financial Accounting Standard Board (the
More informationNavigating a Vessel Through the New Revenue and Leases Standards
Shipping Spotlight February 2018 In This Issue Overview of the New Revenue Standard Overview of the New Leases Standard Implications for Shipping Industry Entities Transition Considerations for Shipowners
More informationby Joe DiLeo and Ermir Berberi, Deloitte & Touche LLP
Heads Up May 11, 2016 Volume 23, Issue 14 In This Issue Collectibility Presentation of Sales Taxes and Similar Taxes Collected From Customers Noncash Consideration Contract Modifications and Completed
More informationDefining Issues. Revenue from Contracts with Customers. June 2014, No
Defining Issues June 2014, No. 14-25 Revenue from Contracts with Customers On May 28, 2014, the FASB and the IASB issued a new accounting standard that is intended to improve and converge the financial
More information[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB- SECTION (i)]
[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB- SECTION (i)] MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 28.03. 2018 G.S.R... (E). In exercise of the powers
More informationRevenue Recognition. Task Force. Status of Implementation Issues. AICPA Financial Reporting Center. Revenue Recognition. aicpa.
Task Force of Implementation Issues February, 08 AICPA Financial Reporting Center On May 8, 04, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 04-09, from Contracts
More informationIFRS 15, Revenue from contracts with customers
IFRS 15, Revenue from contracts with customers ICAJ Workshop 2018 February 3, 2018 Introduction Overview of IFRS 15 The five steps to revenue recognition and changes to existing revenue guidance. Types
More informationRevenue Recognition: Manufacturers & Distributors Supplement
Revenue Recognition: Manufacturers & Distributors Supplement Table of Contents BACKGROUND & SUMMARY... 3 SCOPE... 5 THE REVENUE RECOGNITION MODEL... 5 STEP 1 IDENTIFY THE CONTRACT WITH A CUSTOMER... 5
More informationNew Developments Summary
June 5, 2014 NDS 2014-06 New Developments Summary A shift in the top line The new global revenue standard is here! Summary After dedicating many years to its development, the FASB and the IASB have issued
More informationCenter for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members
REPORT January 18, 2017 Center for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members ASU 2016-20: FASB ASC 606 Technical Corrections & Improvements Implementation
More informationNew revenue guidance Implementation in the aerospace & defense sector
No. US2017-26 September 29, 2017 What s inside: Overview... 1 Scope 2 Identify the contract... 2 Identify performance obligations... 5 Determine the transaction price... 9 Allocate the transaction price
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
June 2010 Basis for Conclusions Exposure Draft ED/2010/6 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Comments to be received by 22 October 2010 Basis for Conclusions on Exposure Draft REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS
More informationASU Revenue from Contracts with Customers
ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Prepared by the PICPA Greater Philadelphia A&A Committee May 2015 Introduction The Greater Philadelphia Chapter s Accounting and Attest Committee has developed
More informationIFRS 15: Revenue from contracts with customers
IFRS 15: Revenue from contracts with customers Effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 December 2017 IFRS 15: Revenue from contracts with customers The IASB published the
More informationreal estate and construction The Revenue Proposals Impact on Construction Companies
real estate and construction The Revenue Proposals Impact on Construction Companies Real Estate and Construction The Revenue Proposals Impact on Construction Companies The IASB and the FASB have jointly
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-19 29 June 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects brokers and dealers in securities In this issue: Overview... 1 Key industry considerations... 2 Scope...
More informationRevenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Look at the New Standard for the Construction & Real Estate Industries
Revenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Look at the New Standard for the Construction & Real Estate Industries Table of Contents BACKGROUND & SUMMARY... 3 SCOPE... 4 THE REVENUE RECOGNITION MODEL... 5 STEP
More informationCenter for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members
REPORT April 19, 2017 Center for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members Common Questions About Special Purpose Frameworks By: Mike Austin When
More informationComment on the Exposure Draft ED/2010/6 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
22 October 2010 International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Dear Sir or Madame, Comment on the Exposure Draft ED/2010/6 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
More informationCopyright 2017 by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY
Accounting Standards Update 2016-14 (ASU 2016-14), Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities HEALTHCARE ENTITY CONSIDERATIONS ISSUES ANALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND AVAILABILITY Background
More informationRevenue for power and utilities companies
Revenue for power and utilities companies New standard. New challenges. US GAAP March 2018 kpmg.com/us/frv b Revenue for power and utilities companies Revenue viewed through a new lens Again and again,
More informationPower & Utilities Spotlight Generating a Discussion About the FASB s New Revenue Standard
August 2014 Power & Utilities Spotlight Generating a Discussion About the FASB s New Revenue Standard In This Issue: Background Key Accounting Issues Effective Date and Transition Implementation Challenges
More informationntifinancial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized E
ntifinancial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized E Private Companies Practice Section November 2017 Financial Reporting Framework for Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Comparisons of the FRF
More informationThe Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
1. Introduction The Conceptual Framework sets out the concepts which underlie the preparation and presentation of financial statements for external users (Conceptual Framework, Section Purpose and status
More informationFair Value Measurement
U.S. GAAP AND IFRS Fair Value Measurement Questions and Answers November 2013 kpmg.com Contents Substantial Convergence 1 About this Publication 2 Summary of Differences Between U.S. GAAP and IFRS 3 Questions
More informationCertain investments in debt and equity securities
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Certain investments in debt and equity securities (before the adoption of ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
More informationSimilarities and Differences
www.pwc.com/jp/ifrs Similarities and Differences A comparison of IFRS and JP GAAP 2016 April 2016 (This page is intentionally left blank) Contents Preface... 2 How to use this publication... 3 First-time
More informationFASB ASU NO REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS (TOPIC 606)
CPAs & ADVISORS experience clarity // REVENUE RECOGNITION FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Kimberly McKay, CPA Managing Partner BKD. LLP - Houston FASB ASU NO. 2014-09 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS (TOPIC
More informationFinancial Reporting Brief: Roadmap to Understanding the New Revenue Recognition Standards
September 2016 Financial Reporting Center Financial Reporting Brief: Roadmap to Understanding the New Revenue Recognition Standards In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue
More informationNACUBO Advisory 19-01
Table of Contents Introduction...2 Tuition Contracts...2 Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer...3 Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract...4 Step 3: Determine the transaction
More informationRevised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers
Applying IFRS in Oilfield Services IASB proposed standard Revised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers Implications for the oilfield services sector March 2012 2011 Europe, Middle East, India
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
No. 2016-12 May 2016 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification The FASB Accounting
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers. Health care services industry supplement
Note: Since issuing the new revenue standard in May 2014, the FASB and IASB have proposed various amendments to the guidance. This In depth supplement has not been updated to reflect all of the proposed
More informationAt a glance. Overview
What s inside: Overview... 1 Identifying the contract with the customer...2 Determining transfer of control and recognising revenue...3 Variable consideration...7 Contract costs...10 Collectability...
More informationGovernment Contractors: Are You Prepared for the New Revenue Standard? Presented by CohnReznick s Government Contracting Industry Practice
Government Contractors: Are You Prepared for the New Revenue Standard? Presented by CohnReznick s Government Contracting Industry Practice PLEASE READ This presentation has been prepared for information
More informationIFRS news. The future of revenue recognition. Overview. Emerging issues and practical guidance* *connectedthinking PRINT CONTINUED
IFRS news Emerging issues and practical guidance* Supplement March 2009 The future of revenue recognition The IASB and FASB s joint revenue project will have a significant impact on entities revenue recognition
More informationRe: Proposed Accounting Standards Update, The Liquidation Basis of Accounting (File Reference No )
e Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: 212 773 3000 www.ey.com 2012-210 Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5166 Norwalk,
More informationAgenda. Overview of technical standard Amendments to date Impact on construction accounting Implementation action plan Industry initiatives Q&A
Agenda Overview of technical standard Amendments to date Impact on construction accounting Implementation action plan Industry initiatives Q&A Five Step Model Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Identify
More informationApplying IFRS in Engineering and Construction
Applying IFRS in Engineering and Construction The new revenue recognition standard July 2015 Contents Overview 3 1. Summary of the new standard 4 2. Effective date and transition 4 3. Scope 5 4. Identify
More informationThe new revenue recognition standard technology
No. 2014-16 26 August 2014 Technical Line FASB final guidance The new revenue recognition standard technology In this issue: Overview... 1 Scope, transition and effective date... 3 Summary of the new model...
More informationRevenue recognition: A whole new world
Revenue recognition: A whole new world Prepared by: Brian H. Marshall, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP brian.marshall@rsmus.com, +1 203 312 9329 June 2014 UPDATE: To help address
More informationPicture to be changed
Picture to be changed EVOLUTION DEMANDS SPEED AND FLEXIBILITY Dolphins are some of the most successful hunters in the animal kingdom. Their speed, intelligence and adaptability give them a crucial edge.
More informationREVENUE RECOGNITION PROJECT UPDATED OCTOBER 2013 TOPICAL CONTENTS
REVENUE RECOGNITION PROJECT UPDATED OCTOBER 2013 TOPICAL CONTENTS STEP 1: IDENTIFY THE CONTRACT WITH A CUSTOMER... 3 Contracts with Customers that Contain Nonrecourse, Seller-Based Financing... 3 Contract
More informationImplementing the new revenue guidance in the technology industry
Grant Thornton January 2019 Implementing the new revenue guidance in the technology industry A supplement This publication was created for general information purposes, and does not constitute professional
More informationby the Deloitte & Touche LLP National Office Consolidation Team
Heads Up December 29, 2015 (Originally Issued May 26, 2015) Volume 22, Issue 17 In This Issue Background Ready, Set... Wait Am I Prepared? Do I Have a Variable Interest? Is the Entity a VIE? Who Consolidates?
More informationRevenue for Telecoms. Issues In-Depth. September IFRS and US GAAP. kpmg.com
Revenue for Telecoms Issues In-Depth September 2016 IFRS and US GAAP kpmg.com Contents Facing the challenges 1 Introduction 2 Putting the new standard into context 6 1 Scope 9 1.1 In scope 9 1.2 Out of
More informationThe New Era of Revenue Recognition. Chris Harper, CPA, MBA, Senior Manager
The New Era of Revenue Recognition Chris Harper, CPA, MBA, Senior Manager Measuring Temperature What is your level of familiarity with revenue recognition standards that were issued in 2014? I practically
More informationFair Value Measurement and Application
May 5, 2014 Comments Due: August 15, 2014 Proposed Statement of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Fair Value Measurement and Application This Exposure Draft of a proposed Statement of Governmental
More informationRevenue Recognition. Task Force. Status of Implementation Issues. Revenue Recognition. aicpa.org/frc
Task Force of Implementation Issues Financial Reporting Center On May 8, 0, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 0-09, from Contracts with Customers.
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606)
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606) August 2015 To our clients and other friends In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
More informationTechnical Line Common challenges in implementing the new revenue recognition standard
No. 2017-28 24 August 2017 Technical Line Common challenges in implementing the new revenue recognition standard In this issue: Overview... 1 Key accounting and disclosure considerations. 2 Contract duration...
More informationRevenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Update on the Joint Project
The Dbriefs Financial Reporting series presents: Revenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Update on the Joint Project Bob Uhl, Deloitte & Touche LLP Mark Crowley, Deloitte & Touche LLP Bryan Anderson, Deloitte
More informationPwC ReportingPerspectives October 2014
Contents Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind-AS) p4 /Revenue recognition p6 /Service concession arrangements p17 / Fraud and Companies Act, 2013 p20 / Related party relationships and transactions
More informationA QUICK TOUR OF THE NEW REVENUE ACCOUNTING STANDARD
A QUICK TOUR OF THE NEW REVENUE ACCOUNTING STANDARD DISCLAIMER: Iconixx does not provide accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide,
More information4 Revenue recognition 6/08, 12/08, 6/11, 12/11, 6/13, 12/13,
framework that does not explore such topics in more detail may have gaps that will make its applicability less useful. 3.11.2 The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) In a July 2015 meeting, the FRC s Accounting
More informationIn depth A look at current financial reporting issues
inform.pwc.com In depth A look at current financial reporting issues Revenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model No. 2014-02 (supplement) June
More information