Working Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
|
|
- Dominic Lane
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #15-6 Impact of enforceable rights and obligations on contract term Expected Overall Level of Impact to Industry Accounting: Minimal Wording to be Included in the Revenue Recognition Guide: 1. FASB ASC states that an entity shall apply the guidance to the contractual period in which the parties to the contract have present enforceable rights and obligations. Further, FASB ASC states an agreement does not result in enforceable rights and obligations, and therefore a contract does not exist, if it is wholly unperformed and both parties have unilateral rights to terminate the agreement without compensating the other party. 2. The determination of the contractual period in which the parties have present enforceable rights and obligations will require a thorough review of the contract. Common types of contracts seen within the industry include monthto-month contracts, month-to-month contracts with non-refundable upfront fees (e.g., material rights) and noncancelable fixed term contracts with early termination penalties. The contractual period may be readily apparent when there is a fixed non-cancelable term (e.g., two years, which is a common fixed non-cancelable term in telecommunications contracts). However, many telecommunication companies have month-to-month contracts with their customers, either from inception or upon expiration of an initial contract term. Each month of service is automatically renewed, but either party has the ability to terminate the one-month agreement at any time without penalty or to decline the renewal option. 3. Future months for which the customer has not agreed to the renewal would not create enforceable rights and obligations as both parties have the unilateral right to terminate the agreement without penalty. In month-to-month contracts (that do not contain termination penalties if the customer does not renew beyond the current month of service being provided), FinREC believes the contractual period would be for the time period for which each party has enforceable rights and obligations (generally, the current month that has been agreed to), and future renewal
2 periods that have not been exercised by the customer would not be part of the contractual period until the renewal is exercised (i.e., each month is its own contractual period). 4. Another example is when a customer pays for a device using a wireless equipment installment plan ( EIP ) arrangement. A customer signs an EIP agreement which allows the customer to pay for the device up to a maximum payment period (e.g., 24 months) with a minimum monthly payment amount. Simultaneously, the customer enters into a separate contract for one month of service and the option to enter into subsequent monthly service contracts. For simplicity, assume that the month-to-month service plan may be renewed at the then-current standalone selling price, and that no upfront fee is required. The existence of a stated renewal rate or an upfront fee may affect the accounting conclusion related to this example, see Issue #15-7, Material Renewal Rights in Telecommunications Contracts for further discussion. The entity concludes the arrangement should be accounted for as a combined contract as the sale of the device and the one month service contract with a right to renew were negotiated as a package in accordance with FASB ASC (a). The customer may pay the unpaid balance owed for the device over any period up to the maximum term, however, the customer must continue to enter into additional monthly service contracts if they wish to extend the payment period for the device to the maximum allowable period. If the customer wishes to not enter into a subsequent monthly service contract they must pay off the remaining balance on the device, if any. 5. Because the EIP contract in this example does not require the customer to maintain service in order to keep the device, there is no legally enforceable obligation beyond the one month of service as the purchase of additional months is an option for the customer, whereby they can pay off the device and terminate service or renew service and further defer a portion of the remaining amount owed on the device. The FASB-IASB Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition (TRG) clarified contract enforceability and termination clauses, optional purchases, customer termination rights and penalties in TRG Agenda Ref No. 48: Customer Options for Additional Goods and Services. TRG Agenda Ref. No. 49: November 2015 Meeting Summary of Issues Discussed and Next Steps, paragraph 10 states: TRG members supported the view that the legally enforceable contract period should be considered the contract period. Since that meeting, stakeholders have raised further questions (Issue 2) about evaluating a contract when only one party has the right to terminate the contract. TRG members agreed with the staff analysis that the views expressed at the October 2014 TRG meeting would be consistent regardless of whether both parties can terminate, or whether only one party can terminate. TRG members highlighted that when performing an evaluation of the contract term and the effect of termination penalties, an entity should consider whether those penalties are substantive. Determining whether a penalty is substantive will require judgment and the examples in the TRG paper do not create a bright line for what is substantive. The TRG discussion illustrates that a penalty is a form of compensation paid to the vendor for both (1) foregoing the transfer of future goods or services to the customer along with (2) the resulting amounts that otherwise would be payable to the vendor, as contractually agreed. A penalty generally is incremental to contractual payments due to the vendor for previously transferred goods and services up to the time of cancellation. 6. FinREC believes an EIP contract, when combined with the month-to-month service contract, may include a substantive termination penalty when the contract includes a significant financing component at contract inception (see Issue #15-5, Considering the effect of the time value of money for further discussion). If a customer cancels (or fails to renew) the service contract, the customer is required to pay the amount owed on the device and loses the financing discount (the benefit of the time value of money) that was provided at contract inception. TRG Agenda Ref. No. 48: Customer options for additional goods and services, paragraph 48 includes an example similar to the EIP contract example, whereby an entity considers whether a penalty (or foregoing an upfront discount) is substantive: Contract 2: An entity sells equipment and consumable parts for the equipment (both the equipment and parts are distinct goods that do not meet the overtime criteria). The standalone selling price of the equipment and parts is CU 10,000 and CU100, respectively. The entity sells the equipment for CU 6,000 (a 40% discount from standalone selling price) and provides an option to purchase each part for CU 100. If the customer does not purchase at least 200 parts, it is required to pay a penalty to repay some or all of the CU 4,000 discount
3 provided on the equipment. The penalty decreases as each part is purchased at a rate of CU 20 per part. A discount of CU 10 would be viewed as a material right to the customer. For this example, the FASB staff concluded, and the TRG agreed, that the requirement to forego the discount should be viewed as a termination penalty that needs to be evaluated as to whether it is substantive. In the case of an EIP contract, the telecommunications entity would consider the quantitative amount of the penalty (i.e., the loss of the financing discount), as well as other qualitative factors that may be relevant to the assessment of whether the penalty is substantive and provide evidence of enforceable rights and obligations beyond the one month service contract. If the termination penalty is substantive, the telecommunications entity s identification of performance obligations would include additional months of service to be provided after the contractual minimum one month (the number of periods over which foregoing the financing discount would be considered a substantive penalty, which may be up to the end of the maximum payment period of the EIP). 7. Generally, if a significant financing component does not exist in the contract, the loss of the financing discount upon a customer s termination of the installment plan would not likely be considered a substantive penalty, and the service contract would be accounted for as a monthly contract with a renewal option that should be evaluated to determine if the option is a material right. 8. Telecommunications entities may include other incentives (e.g., options for free future goods and services) within contracts, which may be material rights. The revenue that is deferred for an incentive deemed to be a material right should be recognized when the future goods or services are transferred or when the option expires. Refer to Issue #15-7, Material Renewal Rights in Telecommunications Contracts for additional information. 9. Consideration should be given as to whether the ability of the customer to renew at the end of the contract s stated term is a stand ready obligation. Stand ready obligations are discussed in BC50 of FASB ASU BC50 discusses when there is a stand ready obligation on the part of an entity, when the entity must perform at the discretion of the customer and only the customer can terminate the contract. As noted earlier, in month-to-month contracts (that do not contain termination penalties for beyond the current month of service being provided), FinREC believes the contractual period would be for the time period for which each party has enforceable rights and obligations (generally, the current month that has been agreed to), and future renewal periods that have not been exercised by the customer would not be part of the contractual period until the renewal is exercised (i.e., each month is its own contractual period). Further, telecommunications entities typically have the right to terminate the contract; that is, the nature of these month-to-month contracts is such that the customer is not the only party with the right to terminate the contract. As a result, FinREC believes the customer s ability to renew a monthly contract at the then current standalone selling price does not contain a stand ready obligation as contemplated by the FASB. 10. A telecommunications company would also consider whether the monthly price for service is at a then current standalone selling price or if it is a rate stated at contract inception with no ability to re-price. A month-to-month contract that provides a fixed renewal price may provide the customer with the right to renew the contract at a rate different (presumably, lower) than the standalone selling price (i.e., the price charged to other customers). In these circumstances, a telecommunications company would evaluate whether a material right exists as a result of the difference in pricing. Refer to Issue #15-7, Material Renewal Rights in Telecommunications Contracts, for further discussion regarding material rights. 11. The determination of whether the parties to a contract have a unilateral enforceable right to terminate a wholly unperformed contract without compensating the other party (or parties) will require a thorough review of the contract. Telecommunication companies may have clauses in customer agreements that give the company the unilateral right to modify or cancel the contract without compensating the customer. For example, at contract inception, a telecommunications company may have the unilateral right to change the channel line-up for its television service contracts. However, the customer may not have the unilateral right to cancel service due to this change in channel line-up (i.e., the customer may cancel but subject to penalty). BC50 of FASB ASU explains that when only the entity (e.g., the telecommunications company) can terminate the wholly unperformed contract without penalty, and not the customer, the telecommunication company has an enforceable right to payment from the customer if it chooses to perform.
4 12. Some telecommunications companies include language in their customer contracts that require the customer to pay a penalty for terminating the contract earlier than the contractual period. A substantive termination penalty that compensates the other party is evidence of the enforceable rights and obligations for both parties throughout the period covered by the termination penalty. Determining whether a termination penalty is substantive requires judgment. Some of the factors a telecommunications entity may consider include: a. The nature and purpose of the termination penalty (i.e., is it designed to compel customers to stay? Is it meant to recoup upfront costs?) b. The amount of the penalty c. The specific laws and regulations in the given jurisdiction (i.e., certain jurisdictions may limit the amount of or not permit an entity to charge termination penalties) 13. No one factor is determinative, and a telecommunications entity may reach different conclusions for different types of contracts depending on their facts and circumstances. If a contract does not include a substantive termination payment, the duration of the contract may be shorter than the stated contractual term. 14. There is diversity in the telecommunications industry on enforcement of the termination penalties. If the telecommunications company has legal and contractual rights to that substantive termination penalty (regardless of whether it is actively enforced), then FinREC believes a contract exists pursuant to the stated contractual period (i.e., the period for which there are present enforceable rights and obligations). The Board decided in BC32 of FASB ASU that the determination of whether an agreement creates enforceable rights and obligations is a question to be considered within the relevant legal framework. Therefore, FinREC believes that the question of whether the substantive termination penalty is actively enforced does not affect the conclusion of what the contractual period is unless the entity s lack of enforcement changes the entity s enforceable rights and obligations in the relevant legal jurisdiction. Rather, it is the stated contractual period in the contract for which there are present enforceable rights and obligations that establishes the contractual period. 15. The following example is illustrative, and the actual determination of the contract term should be based on the facts and circumstances of an entity s specific situation. Example 1: A new customer is offered telephone service for a two-year period for $20 per month, which represents the standalone selling price of this particular plan. At the end of the two-year period, the customer has the right to renew the contract on a month-to-month basis at the then current standalone selling price. The contract includes a significant termination penalty if the customer elects to terminate the agreement prior to the end of the two-year period. The company determines the termination penalty is substantive. The company has a poor history of billing and attempting to collect termination penalties. The company s past practice of allowing customers to terminate the contract without enforcing collection of the termination penalty does not change the parties enforceable rights and obligations in the contract. That is, regardless of the company s intention or ability to enforce it, the present rights and obligations within the contract are for the company to provide two years of telephone service for which it has right to payment from the customer. Therefore, the agreement constitutes a contract with a two-year contractual period. 16. Certain foreign jurisdictions have consumer-friendly laws that may invalidate a company s contracts with its customers if challenged in a court of law. Therefore, careful consideration will be needed for contracts that have been approved and committed to by the entity and its customers, but may not be enforceable in a court of law in a specific jurisdiction. This evaluation may be more complex in situations where contracts are entered into across multiple jurisdictions.
5 Comments should be received by February 1, 2018, and sent by electronic mail to Desiré Carroll at or you can send them by mail to Desiré Carroll, Accounting Standards, AICPA, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, NY DISCLAIMER: This publication has not been approved, disapproved or otherwise acted upon by any senior committees of, and does not represent an official position of, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. It is distributed with the understanding that the contributing authors and editors, and the publisher, are not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services in this publication. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Copyright 2016 by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY All rights reserved. For information about the procedure for requesting permission to make copies of any part of this work, please copyright@aicpa.org with your request. Otherwise, requests should be written and mailed to the Permissions Department, AICPA, 220 Leigh Farm Road, Durham, NC
Working Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
May 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Telecommunications Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #15-3 Contract Modifications Expected Overall Level of Impact
More informationWorking Draft: Software Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
February 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Software Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #14-7: Significant Financing Components in Software Arrangements Expected
More informationWorking Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
December 15, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #3-5: Investment Banking M&A Advisory Fees Expected Overall
More informationWorking Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
January 2, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #3-2: Selling and Distribution Fee Revenue Expected Overall Level
More informationStep 5: Recognize Revenue When (or as) the Entity Satisfied a Performance Obligation
February 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Aerospace and Defense Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #1-5: Transfer of Control on Non-US Federal Government
More informationWorking Draft: Not-for-Profit Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
December 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Not-for-Profit Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #11-5: Not-for-Profit Subscriptions and Membership Dues Expected
More information3. This paper focuses on extended warranty contracts, not written by an insurance entity, that meet the criteria in FASB ASC
February 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Accounting for Third Party Extended Service Warranty Contracts (Applicable to Non- Insurance Entities) - Revenue Recognition
More informationWorking Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
November 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Broker-Dealer Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #3-4: Underwriting Revenues Expected Overall Level of Impact
More informationWorking Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
February 1, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #6-13 Disclosures Contract with Customers Expected Overall Level of
More informationWorking Draft: Allowance for Credit Losses Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Credit Losses
October 30, 2018 Financial Reporting Center Credit Losses Working Draft: Allowance for Credit Losses Implementation Issue Issue #6: Reasonable and Supportable Forecast Developing the Period and Use of
More informationWorking Draft: Health Care Entities Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
October 2, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Health Care Entities Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #8-9 Risk Sharing Arrangements Expected Overall Level of
More informationRevenue for Telecoms. Issues In-Depth. September IFRS and US GAAP. kpmg.com
Revenue for Telecoms Issues In-Depth September 2016 IFRS and US GAAP kpmg.com Contents Facing the challenges 1 Introduction 2 Putting the new standard into context 6 1 Scope 9 1.1 In scope 9 1.2 Out of
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
No. 2016-12 May 2016 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification The FASB Accounting
More informationTransition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition items of general agreement
Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition items of general agreement This table summarizes the issues on which members of the Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition (TRG) created
More informationApplying IFRS. Joint Transition Group for Revenue Recognition items of general agreement. Updated December 2015
Applying IFRS Joint Transition Group for Revenue Recognition items of general agreement Updated December 2015 Contents Overview... 3 1. Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer... 4 1.1 Collectability...
More informationFASB/IASB Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition July 2015 Meeting Summary of Issues Discussed and Next Steps
TRG Agenda ref 44 STAFF PAPER Project Paper topic November 9, 2015 FASB/IASB Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition July 2015 Meeting Summary of Issues Discussed and Next Steps CONTACT(S)
More informationTransition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition Items of general agreement
Applying IFRS Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition Items of general agreement Updated March 2019 Contents Overview... 3 1. Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer... 4 1.1 Collectability...
More informationFASB/IASB Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition Application of the Series Provision and Allocation of Variable Consideration
TRG Agenda ref 39 STAFF PAPER Project Paper topic July 13, 2015 FASB/IASB Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition Application of the Series Provision and Allocation of Variable Consideration
More informationApplying IFRS. Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition - items of general agreement. Updated June 2016
Applying IFRS Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition - items of general agreement Updated June 2016 Contents Overview...3 1. Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer... 4 1.1 Collectability...
More informationApplying IFRS. Joint Transition Resource Group discusses additional revenue implementation issues. July 2015
Applying IFRS Joint Transition Resource Group discusses additional revenue implementation issues July 2015 Contents Overview 2 1. Issues that may require further discussion 2 1.1 Application of the constraint
More informationNARUC: REVENUE RECOGNITION JULIE PETIT AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER BRIAN JONES AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 TH, 2017
NARUC: REVENUE RECOGNITION JULIE PETIT AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER BRIAN JONES AUDIT SENIOR MANAGER MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 TH, 2017 Mazars USA LLP is an independent member firm of Mazars Group. Mazars USA LLP is
More informationThe new revenue recognition standard - software and cloud services
Applying IFRS in Software and Cloud Services The new revenue recognition standard - software and cloud services January 2015 Overview Software entities may need to change their revenue recognition policies
More informationTechnical Line Common challenges in implementing the new revenue recognition standard
No. 2017-28 24 August 2017 Technical Line Common challenges in implementing the new revenue recognition standard In this issue: Overview... 1 Key accounting and disclosure considerations. 2 Contract duration...
More informationApplying IFRS. TRG addresses more revenue implementation issues. November 2015
Applying IFRS TRG addresses more revenue implementation issues November 2015 Contents Overview 2 1. Accounting for renewals and restrictions in licences of IP 2 2. Update on previous TRG issues 4 3. What
More informationCenter for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members
REPORT January 18, 2017 Center for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members ASU 2016-20: FASB ASC 606 Technical Corrections & Improvements Implementation
More informationThe new revenue recognition standard technology
No. 2014-16 26 August 2014 Technical Line FASB final guidance The new revenue recognition standard technology In this issue: Overview... 1 Scope, transition and effective date... 3 Summary of the new model...
More informationChanges to revenue recognition for not-for-profit organizations
Changes to revenue recognition for not-for-profit organizations Prepared by: Susan L. Davis, Partner, RSM US LLP susanl.davis@rsmus.com, +1 515 281 9275 Susan Stewart, Senior Director, RSM US LLP susanc.stewart@rsmus.com,
More informationRevenue Recognition (Topic 605)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update (Revised) Issued: November 14, 2011 and January 4, 2012 Comments Due: March 13, 2012 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Revenue from Contracts with Customers (including
More informationRevenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Look at the New Standard
Revenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Look at the New Standard BACKGROUND & SUMMARY... 3 SCOPE... 4 COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENTS... 4 THE REVENUE RECOGNITION MODEL... 5 STEP 1 IDENTIFY THE CONTRACT WITH A
More informationRevenue From Contracts With Customers
September 2017 Revenue From Contracts With Customers Understanding and Implementing the New Rules An article by Scott Lehman, CPA, and Alex J. Wodka, CPA Audit / Tax / Advisory / Risk / Performance Smart
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers: The Final Standard
Revenue from Contracts with Customers: The Final Standard 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and effective date.... 3 Key provisions of the standard.... 3 Transition.... 12 Planning.... 13 How Experis Finance
More informationThe new revenue recognition standard retail and consumer products
Applying IFRS in Retail and Consumer Products The new revenue recognition standard retail and consumer products May 2015 Contents Overview... 3 1. Summary of the new standard... 4 2. Scope, transition
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-19 29 June 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects brokers and dealers in securities In this issue: Overview... 1 Key industry considerations... 2 Scope...
More informationA QUICK TOUR OF THE NEW REVENUE ACCOUNTING STANDARD
A QUICK TOUR OF THE NEW REVENUE ACCOUNTING STANDARD DISCLAIMER: Iconixx does not provide accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide,
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-14 22 June 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects telecommunications entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Contract term... 2 Identifying performance obligations
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-22 Updated 4 December 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects life sciences entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Collaborative arrangements... 2 Effect of
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-27 25 August 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects engineering and construction entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Identifying performance obligations
More informationThe New Revenue Standard State of the Industry and Prevailing Approaches for Adoption Where are we today and what s to come?
The New Revenue Standard Where are we today and what s to come? June 26, 2017 Speaking with you today Grant Casner Grant has been with Deloitte for over 14 years and advises companies on complex accounting
More informationRevenue Recognition: Manufacturers & Distributors Supplement
Revenue Recognition: Manufacturers & Distributors Supplement Table of Contents BACKGROUND & SUMMARY... 3 SCOPE... 5 THE REVENUE RECOGNITION MODEL... 5 STEP 1 IDENTIFY THE CONTRACT WITH A CUSTOMER... 5
More informationA shift in the top line
A shift in the top line A new global standard on accounting for revenue The FASB, along with the IASB, has finally issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, its new standard on revenue.
More informationRevenue Recognition. Task Force. Status of Implementation Issues. AICPA Financial Reporting Center. Revenue Recognition. aicpa.
Task Force of Implementation Issues February, 08 AICPA Financial Reporting Center On May 8, 04, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 04-09, from Contracts
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-20 29 June 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue standard affects asset managers In this issue: Overview... 1 Background... 2 Identifying the contract with a customer...
More informationRevenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Look at the New Standard for the Construction & Real Estate Industries
Revenue Recognition: A Comprehensive Look at the New Standard for the Construction & Real Estate Industries Table of Contents BACKGROUND & SUMMARY... 3 SCOPE... 4 THE REVENUE RECOGNITION MODEL... 5 STEP
More informationNew Developments Summary
May 10, 2016 NDS 2016-07 New Developments Summary FASB Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition meeting highlights Summary of April 18 meeting Summary The U.S. based members of the Joint Transition
More informationTransition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition Sales-Based or Usage-Based Royalty with Minimum Guarantee.
TRG Agenda ref 58 STAFF PAPER November 7, 2016 Project Paper topic Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition Sales-Based or Usage-Based Royalty with Minimum Guarantee CONTACT(S) Dan Drobac ddrobac@fasb.org
More informationIFRS IN PRACTICE IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
IFRS IN PRACTICE 2018 IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers 2 IFRS IN PRACTICE 2018 IFRS 15 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS IFRS IN PRACTICE 2018 IFRS 15 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
More informationRevenue Recognition (Topic 605)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: June 24, 2010 Comments Due: October 22, 2010 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Revenue from Contracts with Customers This Exposure Draft of a proposed Accounting
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
Grant Thornton August 2017 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Navigating the guidance in ASC 606 and ASC 340-40 This publication was created for general information purposes, and does not constitute
More informationFinancial reporting developments. The road to convergence: the revenue recognition proposal
Financial reporting developments The road to convergence: the revenue recognition proposal August 2010 To our clients and To our clients and other friends The Financial Accounting Standard Board (the
More informationJoint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition discusses more implementation issues
Applying IFRS Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition discusses more implementation issues April 2015 Contents 1. Overview... 2 2. Issues that may require further evaluation by the Boards...
More informationApplying IFRS. IASB proposed standard. Revenue from contracts with customers the revised proposal
Applying IFRS IASB proposed standard Revenue from contracts with customers the revised proposal January 2012 Overview What you need to know The IASB and the FASB have issued a second exposure draft of
More informationObservations From a Review of Public Filings by Early Adopters of the New Revenue Standard
Heads Up Volume 25, Issue 1 January 22, 2018 In This Issue Introduction Interim Versus Annual Reporting Considerations Description of Population Disaggregation of Revenue Contract Balances Performance
More informationGovernment Contractors: Are You Prepared for the New Revenue Standard? Presented by CohnReznick s Government Contracting Industry Practice
Government Contractors: Are You Prepared for the New Revenue Standard? Presented by CohnReznick s Government Contracting Industry Practice PLEASE READ This presentation has been prepared for information
More informationRevenue Recognition: Construction Industry Supplement
Revenue Recognition: Construction Industry Supplement Table of Contents BACKGROUND & SUMMARY... 4 SCOPE... 5 THE REVENUE RECOGNITION MODEL... 5 STEP 1 IDENTIFY THE CONTRACT WITH A CUSTOMER... 6 Collectibility...
More informationEffects of the New Revenue Standard: Observations From a Review of First- Quarter 2018 Public Filings by Power and Utilities Companies
Power & Utilities Spotlight July 2018 In This Issue Background Review of Public Disclosure Filings Contacts Effects of the New Revenue Standard: Observations From a Review of First- Quarter 2018 Public
More informationRevenue for the engineering and construction industry
Revenue for the engineering and construction industry The new standard s effective date is coming. US GAAP December 2016 kpmg.com/us/frn b Revenue for the engineering and construction industry Revenue
More informationRevenue for power and utilities companies
Revenue for power and utilities companies New standard. New challenges. US GAAP March 2018 kpmg.com/us/frv b Revenue for power and utilities companies Revenue viewed through a new lens Again and again,
More informationNACUBO Advisory 19-01
Table of Contents Introduction...2 Tuition Contracts...2 Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer...3 Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract...4 Step 3: Determine the transaction
More informationThe New Era of Revenue Recognition. Chris Harper, CPA, MBA, Senior Manager
The New Era of Revenue Recognition Chris Harper, CPA, MBA, Senior Manager Measuring Temperature What is your level of familiarity with revenue recognition standards that were issued in 2014? I practically
More informationRevenue Recognition. Task Force. Status of Implementation Issues. Revenue Recognition. aicpa.org/frc
Task Force of Implementation Issues Financial Reporting Center On May 8, 0, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 0-09, from Contracts with Customers.
More informationIFRS 15 for investment management companies
IFRS 15 for investment management companies Are you good to go? Application guidance May 2018 Contents Contents Purpose of this document 1 1 Overview 2 2 Contracts partially in the scope of IFRS 15 5 3
More informationCopyright 2017 by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York, NY
Accounting Standards Update 2016-14 (ASU 2016-14), Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities HEALTHCARE ENTITY CONSIDERATIONS ISSUES ANALYSIS LIQUIDITY AND AVAILABILITY Background
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606)
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606) August 2015 To our clients and other friends In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
More informationRecognition Transition Resource Group 2015 Update
BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company BDO KNOWLEDGE limited by guarantee, Webinar Series and forms Revenue part of the Recognition
More informationLife Sciences Accounting and Financial Reporting Update Interpretive Guidance on Revenue Recognition Under ASC 606
Life Sciences Accounting and Financial Reporting Update Interpretive Guidance on Revenue Recognition Under ASC 606 March 2017 Revenue Recognition Background In May 2014, the FASB 1 and IASB issued their
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
R International Financial Reporting Standard 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers IFRS 15 In April 2001 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) adopted IAS 11 Construction Contracts and
More informationREVENUE RECOGNITION PROJECT UPDATED OCTOBER 2013 TOPICAL CONTENTS
REVENUE RECOGNITION PROJECT UPDATED OCTOBER 2013 TOPICAL CONTENTS STEP 1: IDENTIFY THE CONTRACT WITH A CUSTOMER... 3 Contracts with Customers that Contain Nonrecourse, Seller-Based Financing... 3 Contract
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2016-26 27 July 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue recognition standard affects automotive OEMs In this issue: Overview... 1 Vehicle sales... 2 Sales incentives... 2 Free goods
More informationNew Revenue Recognition Framework: Will Your Entity Be Affected?
New Revenue Recognition Framework: Will Your Entity Be Affected? One of the most significant changes to financial accounting and reporting in recent history is soon to be effective. Reporting entities
More informationRevisions to Chapter 1: Nature, Conduct, and Regulation of the Business,
Revisions to Chapter 1: Nature, Conduct, and Regulation of the Business, of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Property and Liability Insurance Entities. April 17, 2017 Copyright 2017 by American Institute
More informationTransition Resource Group for IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Boundary of reinsurance contracts held with repricing mechanisms
STAFF PAPER May 2018 Project Paper topic Transition Resource Group for IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Boundary of reinsurance contracts held with repricing mechanisms CONTACT(S) Laura Kennedy lkennedy@ifrs.org
More informationASC 606 REVENUE RECOGNITION. Everything you need to know now
ASC 606 REVENUE RECOGNITION Everything you need to know now TOPICS 03 04 07 14 21 31 39 48 54 57 61 66 67 Introduction A revenue recognition primer Identifying the contract Identifying performance obligations
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model
Revenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model No. US2014-01 (supplement) June 18, 2014 What s inside: Overview... 1 Identifying performance obligations...
More informationNew revenue guidance Implementation in the aerospace & defense sector
No. US2017-26 September 29, 2017 What s inside: Overview... 1 Scope 2 Identify the contract... 2 Identify performance obligations... 5 Determine the transaction price... 9 Allocate the transaction price
More informationApplying the new revenue recognition standard
Applying the new revenue recognition standard On May 28, 24, the FASB and IASB issued their final standard on recognizing revenue from customer contracts. The standard, issued as ASU 24-09 by the FASB
More informationDelegations will find attached document D044460/01 Annex 1.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 April 2016 (OR. en) 8024/16 ADD 1 DRS 8 ECOFIN 299 EF 88 COVER NOTE From: To: European Commission No. Cion doc.: D044460/01 Subject: General Secretariat of the
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers
International Financial Reporting Standard 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers In April 2001 the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) adopted IAS 11 Construction Contracts and IAS 18 Revenue,
More informationApplying IFRS. IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. A closer look at the new revenue recognition standard (Updated October 2017)
Applying IFRS IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers A closer look at the new revenue recognition standard (Updated October 2017) Overview The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and
More informationAmerican Institute of CPAs
Statement on Standards for Accounting and Review Services No. 21, Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services: Clarification and Recodification DISCLAIMER: This publication has not been
More informationThe New Health Care Audit Guide And Other Current Topics in Health Care Accounting and Reporting Part 1
The New Health Care Audit Guide And Other Current Topics in Health Care Accounting and Reporting Part 1 FICPA Health Care Conference April 26, 2012 Cline Comer 1 1 Outline Part I AICPA Health Care Audit
More informationRevised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers
Applying IFRS in Oilfield Services IASB proposed standard Revised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers Implications for the oilfield services sector March 2012 2011 Europe, Middle East, India
More informationA closer look at IFRS 15, the revenue recognition standard
Applying IFRS IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers A closer look at IFRS 15, the revenue recognition standard (Updated October 2018) Overview Many entities have recently adopted the largely converged
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers A guide to IFRS 15
Revenue from Contracts with Customers A guide to IFRS 15 March 2018 This guide contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities
More information2017 Deloitte Renewable Energy Seminar Innovating for tomorrow November 13-15, 2017
2017 Deloitte Renewable Energy Seminar Innovating for tomorrow November 13-15, 2017 Teresa Thomas, Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP Jody Force, Managing Director, Deloitte & Touche LLP Accounting for ASC
More informationSTAT / GAAP Update. April 26, 2018
STAT / GAAP Update April 26, 2018 Agenda STAT NAIC update Insurance statutory reporting GAAP ASU 2016-01, Recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities Financial instruments
More information2016 Revenue Recognition Session Parts 1 & 2
2016 AICPA Healthcare Conference 2016 Revenue Recognition Session Parts 1 & 2 Speaker Biographies 25-1 Mike Breen, CPA Mike is an audit partner in KPMG s New York Office. He has experience performing financial
More informationAmendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Recognition of the contractual service margin in profit or loss in the general model
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting January 2019 Project Paper topic Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Recognition of the contractual service margin in profit or loss in the general model CONTACT(S) Anne
More informationSri Lanka Accounting Standard SLFRS 15. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Sri Lanka Accounting Standard SLFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers CONTENTS SRI LANKA ACCOUNTING STANDARD SLFRS 15 REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS paragraphs OBJECTIVE 1 Meeting the objective
More informationRevised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers
Applying IFRS in Oil & Gas IASB proposed standard Revised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers Implications for the oil & gas sector March 2012 2011 Europe, Middle East, India and Africa
More informationAccounting for revenue is changing, are you ready?
1 Accounting for revenue is changing, are you ready? This article aims to: Highlight the key changes that Indian companies can expect on application of Ind AS 115, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
More informationRevised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers. Applying IFRS in Mining & Metals. Implications for the mining & metals sector March 2012
Applying IFRS in Mining & Metals IASB proposed standard Revised proposal for revenue from contracts with customers Implications for the mining & metals sector March 2012 2011 Europe, Middle East, India
More informationNew revenue guidance Implementation in Industrial Products
No. US2017-16 August 17, 2017 What s inside: Overview... 1 Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer... 2 Step 2: Identify performance obligations... 4 Step 3: Determine... 5 Step 4: Allocate...8
More informationThe new revenue recognition standard - Joint Transition Resource Group
Applying IFRS The new revenue recognition standard - Joint Transition Resource Group January 2015 Contents 1. Overview... 2 2. Issues discussed without general consensus... 2 2.1 Accounting for contract
More informationAccounting Update Seminar: New Revenue Recognition and Lease Accounting
Accounting Update Seminar: New Revenue Recognition and Lease Accounting January 23, 2019 Presented by: Mark Hagander, Principal & Matt Cochran, Principal Revenue from Contracts with Customers (FASB ASC
More informationNew revenue guidance Implementation in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector
No. US2017-20 September 06, 2017 What s inside: Overview... 1 Scope... 2 Step 1: Identify the contract. 2 Step 2: Identify performance obligations.. 4 Step 3: Determine transaction price.7 Step 4: Allocate
More informationAudit, Review, Compilation, and Preparation of Financial Statements
Audit, Review, Compilation, and Preparation of Financial Statements DISCLAIMER: This publication has not been approved, disapproved or otherwise acted upon by any senior technical committees of, and does
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-16 29 June 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new revenue recognition standard affects downstream oil and gas entities In this issue: Overview... 1 Scope and scope exceptions... 2
More informationSIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING & REPORTING MATTERS FIRST QUARTER 2017
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING & REPORTING MATTERS FIRST QUARTER 2017 Significant Accounting & Reporting Matters First Quarter 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)... 3 Final FASB
More informationQuarterly Accounting Update: On the Horizon The following selected FASB exposure drafts and projects are outstanding as of April 12, 2015.
Quarterly Accounting Update: On the Horizon The following selected FASB exposure drafts and projects are outstanding as of April 12, 2015. Proposed Delay of Effective Date for Revenue Recognition Standard
More information