SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division
|
|
- Randall Cannon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Citation: S. V. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2016 SSTADIS 87 Tribunal File Number: AD BETWEEN: S. V. Appellant and Minister of Employment and Social Development (formerly known as the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development) Respondent SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division DECISION BY: Janet Lew DATE OF DECISION: February 25, 2016
2 REASONS AND DECISION OVERVIEW [1] The Appellant appeals a decision dated July 21, 2015 of the General Division, whereby it summarily dismissed his appeal of a decision denying his request for greater retroactivity of an Old Age Security pension under the Old Age Security Act. The General Division summarily dismissed the appeal, given that it was satisfied that it did not have a reasonable chance of success. [2] The Appellant filed an appeal of the decision of the General Division on October 6, 2015 (the Notice of Appeal ). No leave is necessary in the case of an appeal brought under subsection 53(3) of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act (DESDA), as there is an appeal as of right when dealing with a summary dismissal from the General Division. Having determined that no further hearing is required, this appeal before me is proceeding pursuant to subsection 37(a) of the Social Security Tribunal Regulations. ISSUES [3] The issues before me are as follows: 1. Is a standard of review analysis applicable when reviewing decisions of the General Division? 2. Did the General Division err in choosing to summarily dismiss the Appellant s appeal? 3. Did the General Division err in determining that the Appellant was unable to cancel his retirement pension in favour of a disability pension under the Canada Pension Plan?
3 BACKGROUND [4] The key dates are as follows: (a) (b) June birthdate of Appellant and September 2013 the Respondent received the Appellant s application for an Old Age Security pension. [5] An Old Age Security pension was paid retroactively to the Appellant from October The Appellant requested greater retroactivity of payment of the pension to June 2011, when he turned 65 years old. The Respondent maintained its position that the Appellant had been paid the maximum retroactivity permitted under the applicable legislation. The Appellant appealed to the General Division. [6] On June 12, 2015, the General Division gave notice in writing to the Appellant, advising that it was considering summarily dismissing the appeal. The General Division invited the Appellant to provide detailed written submissions by no later than July 17, 2015, if he believed that the appeal should not be summarily dismissed, and that he should explain why his appeal had a reasonable chance of success. The Appellant did not respond to the letter dated July 17, 2015 from the General Division. [7] The General Division rendered its decision on July 21, The General Division found that the Old Age Security Act limits the maximum retroactivity of Old Age Security pension payments to eleven months prior to receipt of an application for an Old Age Security pension, and that in this case, the Appellant was receiving the maximum retroactivity permitted by the Old Age Security Act and the Regulations thereto. [8] On September 4, 2015, the Appellant filed an appeal from the summary dismissal decision of the General Division.
4 SUBMISSIONS [9] The Appellant submits that he is entitled to greater retroactivity of payment of an Old Age Security pension, as he has been the subject of racial discrimination in employment settings. He seeks some financial assistance for short-term economic survival. [10] The Appellant filed additional submissions on November 16, He submits that the General Division erred when it wrote that generally speaking, ignorance of the law is no excuse, as Service Canada representatives had not properly and adequately informed him of his entitlement to an Old Age Security pension. He further submits that there is no openness and a lack of transparency about the availability of the benefit. The Appellant further submits that the General Division lacked integrity by refusing him his right to fairness and equity [as an immigrant and newcomer]. [11] On November 20, 2015, the Social Security Tribunal wrote to the Appellant, requesting that he identify any alleged errors in the General Division decision, under subsection 58(1) of the DESDA. On the same day, the Respondent filed submissions. [12] The Respondent submits that the General Division correctly stated and applied the test as to when it must summarily dismiss an appeal. The Respondent further submits that the General Division also correctly stated the law as it relates to the retroactivity of Old Age Security pension payments and reasonably applied it to the facts. The Respondent submits that the earliest the Appellant could receive payment is October 2012, the month in which his pension payments commenced and that the appeal therefore had no reasonable chance of success. The Respondent submits that the General Division did not err in summarily dismissing the appeal. The Respondent submits that the General Division s decision contains no reviewable error to permit the intervention of the Appeal Division. [13] The Appellant filed another letter with the Social Security Tribunal on February 23, 2016, enquiring about the status of his appeal. He did not identify any alleged errors in the General Division decision.
5 ISSUE 1: STANDARD OF REVIEW [14] Counsel for the Respondent raised the issue of the standard of review. I have addressed the issue of the applicability of the standard of review in a number of recent decisions, including in C.A.S. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development (January 21, 2016), SSTAD (currently unreported). I have concluded, based on the prevailing jurisprudence of the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada (Attorney General) v. Jean, 2015 FCA 242 (CanLII), that notwithstanding the submissions of counsel for the Respondent, that I must refrain from borrowing from the terminology and the spirit of judicial review in an administrative appeal context and restrict myself to determining whether the General Division, in the proceedings before me, erred in summarily dismissing the appeal before it, or otherwise erred in law in calculating the allowable retroactivity of payment of an Old Age Security pension, and if so, to then determine the appropriate remedy. [15] As the Federal Court of Appeal has pointed out in Jean, the mandate of the Appeal Division is conferred to it by sections 55 to 69 of the DESDA, where it hears appeals pursuant to subsection 58(1) of the DESDA. Subsection 58(1) of the DESDA sets out the grounds of appeal, and subsection 59(1) of the DESDA sets out the powers of the Appeal Division. The only grounds of appeal under subsection 58(1) are as follows: (a) (b) (c) The General Division failed to observe a principle of natural justice or otherwise acted beyond or refused to exercise its jurisdiction; The General Division erred in law in making its decision, whether or not the error appears on the face of the record; or The General Division based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it.
6 ISSUE 2: DID THE GENERAL DIVISION ERR IN CHOOSING TO SUMMARILY DISMISS THE APPELLANT S APPEAL? [16] The Appellant did not address the issue of the appropriateness of the summary dismissal of his appeal before the General Division, but I will nonetheless briefly address it. [17] Subsection 53(1) of the DESDA requires the General Division to summarily dismiss an appeal if it is satisfied that it has no reasonable chance of success. If the General Division either failed to identify the test or misstated the test altogether, this would qualify as an error of law. [18] Here, the General Division correctly stated the test for a summary dismissal by citing subsection 53(1) of the DESDA. It is insufficient, however, to simply recite the test for a summary dismissal set out in subsection 53(1) of the DESDA, without properly applying it. Having correctly identified the test, the second step required the General Division to apply the law to the facts. [19] In determining the appropriateness of the summary dismissal procedure and deciding whether an appeal has a reasonable chance of success, a decision-maker must determine whether there is a triable issue and whether there is any merit to the claim. As long as there is an adequate factual foundation to support an appeal and the outcome is not manifestly clear, then the matter is not appropriate for a summary dismissal. A weak case is not appropriate for a summary disposition, as it necessarily involves assessing the merits of the case and examining the evidence and assigning weight to it. [20] The General Division recognized when a summary dismissal is appropriate. The General Division found that there was no reasonable chance for the Appellant to succeed on an appeal, given the law and the facts. The General Division found that the Old Age Security Act and the Regulations apply and that there are no provisions by which the maximum retroactivity sections can be bypassed. [21] The General Division considered whether, on the facts before it, the appeal met the high threshold set out under subsection 53(1) of the DESDA. As the General
7 Division was satisfied that the appeal was without any merit, it rightly concluded that the appeal had no reasonable chance of success, and properly summarily dismissed it on that basis. ISSUE 3: DID THE GENERAL DIVISION ERR IN DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM RETROACTIVITY OF THE OLD AGE SECURITY PENSION? [22] The Appellant is seeking greater retroactivity of payment of an Old Age Security pension. However, he did not cite any legal authorities to support his submissions. [23] The Appellant alleges that he has been the subject of racial discrimination in employment settings and that he requires financial assistance, but these do not speak to any of the grounds of appeal under subsection 58(1) of the DESDA. [24] The Appellant alleges that the Respondent failed to properly and adequately inform him of his entitlement to an Old Age Security pension. This submission too does not speak to any of the grounds of appeal under subsection 58(1) of the DESDA. In any event, there is no duty on the Respondent to directly inform individuals of the availability of the pension. [25] The Appellant further alleges that the General Division lacked integrity by refusing his right to fairness and equity [as an immigrant and newcomer]. This submission presupposes that there is an entitlement to greater retroactivity than that set out under the Old Age Security Act for some members or classes of applicants, but these provisions apply equally to all applicants. The General Division has no equitable jurisdiction (and neither does the Appeal Division) to grant the relief sought by the Appellant. The General Division was bound to follow the Old Age Security Act and the Regulations, and was limited in how much retroactivity it could grant. [26] The Respondent submits that the General Division correctly stated the law with respect to retroactivity of Old Age Security pension payments. The Respondent refers to section 8 of the Old Age Security Act and to subsections 5(1) and 5(2) of the Old Age Security Regulations. Section 8 of the Old Age Security Act and paragraph 5(2) of the Regulations are reproduced in the Respondent s submissions of November 20, 2015.
8 [27] The Old Age Security Act and the Regulations are very specific as to the length of retroactivity of payment of an Old Age Security pension. When an applicant has attained the age of 65 before the day in which the application is received, the approval of the application is effective as of the latest of the day that is one year before the day on which the application was received. And, in the case of an applicant who attained the age of 65, approval of the application can be effective as of such earlier day, not before the later of a day one year before the day on which the application was received... Payment of a pension to any person is to start in the first month after the application has been approved. [28] The General Division referred to and applied these sections in determining the maximum retroactivity to which the Appellant was entitled under the statute. The General Division properly set this out in its analysis and applied the law to the facts. [29] Hence, for an application for Old Age Security pension which was received in September 2013, the approval date is September 2012, a year before the day that is one year before the day on which the application was received. Payments could not commence earlier than October 2012, the month after the application has been approved. [30] I am not persuaded that the General Division erred in its interpretation of the Old Age Security Act or the Regulations. The General Division identified the applicable provisions of the Old Age Security Act and the Regulations and appropriately applied them to the facts, which were not in dispute between the parties. There is no evidence before me that the General Division failed to follow the Old Age Security Act or the Regulations, or that it erred in its interpretation of the applicable statute. [31] Finally, an appellant s financial needs are irrelevant in determining the maximum retroactivity to which one is entitled, as the Old Age Security Act does not provide for this consideration in these circumstances.
9 CONCLUSION [32] Given the considerations above, the Appeal is dismissed. Janet Lew Member, Appeal Division
Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2981 CD Nacional v. FK Sutjeska, order of 19 December 2012
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2981 Football Request for a stay of the decision Likelihood of success Standing to be sued in FIFA disciplinary cases 1.
More informationSOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division
Citation: G. S. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2018 SST 554 Tribunal File Number: AD-17-924 BETWEEN: G. S. Appellant and Minister of Employment and Social Development Respondent SOCIAL
More informationFINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL
FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 Website:
More informationExaminations for discovery Income Tax Act. Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act. Consideration on application. Mandatory examination
1 Examinations for discovery Income Tax Act Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act Consideration on application Mandatory examination LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS RELATED TO IMPROVING THE CASELOAD MANAGEMENT
More informationCitation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: 20121113 (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI 12-30-07792 Coram: B E T W E E N : IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Madam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton
More informationArbitration CAS 2014/A/3642 Erik Salkic v. Football Union of Russia (FUR) & Professional Football Club Arsenal, order of 5 August 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3642 Erik Salkic v. Football Union of Russia (FUR) & Professional Football Club Arsenal, Football Request for a stay of
More informationAt the time of Sec. 80G approval object of trust needs to be examined without considering application of income
At the time of Sec. 80G approval object of trust needs to be examined without considering application of income Citation: Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajkot-III v. Vipassana Trust Court: HIGH COURT OF
More informationCase Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada)
Page 1 Case Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada) Between The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Applicant (Appellant in Appeal), and AXA Insurance (Canada), Respondent (Respondent
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theodore R. Robinson, : Petitioner : : v. : : State Employees' Retirement Board, : No. 1136 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: October 31, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 12132-05 WHSCC Claim No: 298948 Decision Number: 14032 Marlene A. Hickey Chief Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The
More informationArbitration CAS 2013/A/3241 World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) v. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI) & Alice Fiorio, award of 22 January 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2013/A/3241 World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) v. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI) & Alice Fiorio, Panel: Mr Marco Balmelli
More informationThe Public Health Appeals Regulations
PUBLIC HEALTH APPEALS P-37.1 REG 8 1 The Public Health Appeals Regulations being Chapter P-37.1 Reg 8 (effective May 5, 1999) as amended by Saskatchewan Regulations 113/2017; and by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationUNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL D APPEL DES NATIONS UNIES
UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL D APPEL DES NATIONS UNIES James (Appellant and Respondent on Cross-Appeal) v. Secretary-General of the United Nations (Respondent and Appellant on Cross-Appeal)
More informationIn The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010
In The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010 Civil Appeal No. 2 In the Matter of an Appeal pursuant to section 43 (1) of the Income and Business Tax Act, CAP 55 of the Laws of Belize 2000 In the Matter of
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 6 January 2015 On 15 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A LEWIS. Between
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 6 January 2015 On 15 January 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationArbitration CAS 2013/A/3403, 3404 & 3405 SASP Stade Rennais FC v. Al Nasr FC, award of 12 June 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2013/A/3403, 3404 & 3405 award of 12 June 2014 Panel: Mr Marco Balmelli (Switzerland), Sole Arbitrator Football Solidarity contribution
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) OA034192015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st July 2017 On 03 rd August 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Date: 20180111 Manitoba v Kochanowski et al, 2018 MBCA 2 Docket: AI17-30-08752 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA B ETWEEN : HER MAJESTY THE
More informationTable of Contents Section Page
Arbitration Regulations 2015 Table of Contents Section Page Part 1 : General... 1 1. Title... 1 2. Legislative authority... 1 3. Application of the Regulations... 1 4. Date of enactment... 1 5. Date of
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SZJGA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 787 MIGRATION appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate discretion to adjourn hearing on application for judicial
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April Before
IAC-AH-DP-V2 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION Citation: Trigen v. IBEW & Ano. 2002 PESCAD 16 Date: 20020906 Docket: S1-AD-0930 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: TRIGEN
More informationMINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE. and ROBERT MCNALLY. Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
CORAM: NEAR J.A. DE MONTIGNY J.A. Date: 20151106 Docket: A-358-15 Citation: 2015 FCA 248 BETWEEN: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and Appellant ROBERT MCNALLY Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016 Before DEPUTY
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Doiron v. Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission 2011 PECA 9 Date: 20110603 Docket: S1-CA-1205 Registry: Charlottetown
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 975/05R
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 975/05R BEFORE: R. Nairn : Vice-Chair HEARING: October 26, 2006 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: December 29, 2006 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2006
More information1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code
APPEAL FORM (Form 1) This Appeal Form, along with the required attachments, must be delivered to the Employment Standards Tribunal within the appeal period. See Rule 18(3) of the Tribunal s Rules of Practice
More informationGOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO: 228/2015 Date heard: 30 July 2015 Date delivered: 4 August 2015 In the matter between NOMALUNGISA MPOFU Applicant
More informationUNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL D APPEL DES NATIONS UNIES
UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL D APPEL DES NATIONS UNIES Case No. 2012-295 Hamad (Appellant) v. Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the
More informationIN THE PENSION APPEALS BOARD IN RE THE CANADA PENSION PLAN DONALD R. HOPKINS. - and - MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
IN THE PENSION APPEALS BOARD IN RE THE CANADA PENSION PLAN BETWEEN: DONALD R. HOPKINS Appellant - and - MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT Respondent Appeal CP07997 heard in Calgary, Alberta August
More informationArbitration CAS 2015/A/3970 K. v. Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF) & World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), award on jurisdiction of 17 November 2015
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration K. v. Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF) & World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), Panel: His Honour James Robert Reid QC (United Kingdom),
More informationArbitration CAS 2014/A/3472 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Marzena Karpinska & Polish Weightlifting Federation (PWF), award of 5 September 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3472 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Marzena Karpinska & Polish Weightlifting Federation (PWF), Panel: Mr Fabio Iudica
More informationAuthorized by: Director of Social Assistance
1 of 4 PURPOSE 1. To facilitate the processing of an applicant s appeal request, and to clarify responsibility for tasks in the appeal process. PRINCIPLE 2. All applicants have the right of an appeal by
More informationHOLY ALPHA AND OMEGA CHURCH OF TORONTO. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Date: 20090331 Docket: A-214-08 Citation: 2009 FCA 101 Present: BETWEEN: HOLY ALPHA AND OMEGA CHURCH OF TORONTO Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Court Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd July 2017 On 5 th July 2017 Before
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/43426/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Determination Promulgated On 10 th July 2014 On 2 nd September 2014 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE A127482
Filed 2/16/11 Fung v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK. Between AH (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
AA/06781/2014 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 13 April 2016 On 22 July 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationUNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL D APPEL DES NATIONS UNIES
UNITED NATIONS APPEALS TRIBUNAL TRIBUNAL D APPEL DES NATIONS UNIES Al Surkhi et al. (Appellants) v. Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near
More informationArbitration CAS 2009/A/1893 Panionios v. Al-Ahly SC, award of 10 August 2010
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), President; Mr Chris Georghiades (Cyprus); Mr Karim Hafez (Egypt) Football Training compensation
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-3376 JAMES A. KOKKINIS, v. Petitioner,
More informationTAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM
LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2014] NZHC ASTRID RUTH CLARK Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2013-404-004873 [2014] NZHC 1611 BETWEEN AND ASTRID RUTH CLARK Appellant REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2004) Respondent Hearing: 13 June 2014
More informationCITATION: H.M. The Queen in Right of Ontario v. Axa Insurance Canada, 2017 ONSC 3414 COURT FILE NO.: CV DATE: ONTARIO
CITATION: H.M. The Queen in Right of Ontario v. Axa Insurance Canada, 2017 ONSC 3414 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-553910 DATE: 20170601 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER of the Insurance Act, R.S.O.
More informationArbitration CAS 2015/A/4288 El Jaish Sports Club v. Giovanni Funiciello, award of 28 April 2016
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4288 award of 28 April 2016 Panel: Mr Ivaylo Dermendjiev (Bulgaria), Sole Arbitrator Basketball Fees of a FIBA licensed
More informationCITATION: Unifund Assurance Company v. ACE INA Insurance Company, 2017 ONSC 3677 COURT FILE NO.: CV DATE: ONTARIO
CITATION: Unifund Assurance Company v. ACE INA Insurance Company, 2017 ONSC 3677 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-555856 DATE: 20170620 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: Unifund Assurance Company and ACE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN. ALAN DICK AND COMPANY LIMITED [Improperly sued as Alan Dick and Company] AND FAST FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL No. 214 of 2010 BETWEEN ALAN DICK AND COMPANY LIMITED [Improperly sued as Alan Dick and Company] APPELLANT AND FAST FREIGHT FORWARDERS
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE J G MACDONALD. Between. and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 4 th February 2015 On 17 th February 2015 Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Sent: On July 30, 2014 On August 4, Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ALIS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/50518/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Sent: On July 30, 2014 On August 4, 2014 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ALIS MISS ADAKU UZOAMAKA
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Ar Heard at Field House On: 17 November 2004 Dictated 17 November 2004 Notified: 18 January 2005 [IS IS (Concession made by rep representative) Sierra Leone [2005] UKI UKIAT 00009 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
More informationArbitration CAS 2013/A/3237 Bratislav Ristic v. FK Olimpic Sarajevo, award of 14 March 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2013/A/3237 Panel: Mr Stuart McInnes (United Kingdom), Sole Arbitrator Football Termination of the employment contract Definition
More informationHOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD. In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD. And
HOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD And PROVINCIAL HEALTH SERVICES AUTHORITY and THE CHILDREN S AND WOMEN S HEALTH CENTRE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DECISION ON DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS On January
More informationSUMMARY OF APPEALS CHAMBER SENTENCING JUDGEMENT. The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic 26 January 2000
SUMMARY OF APPEALS CHAMBER SENTENCING JUDGEMENT The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic 26 January 2000 The Appeals Chamber of this International Tribunal is now delivering judgement in this matter. Copies of the
More informationCase Name: Graham v. Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect
Page 1 Case Name: Graham v. Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect Appearances: Between: Malvia Graham, applicant, and Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect, insurer [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No.
More informationWW (EEA Regs. civil partnership) Thailand [2009] UKAIT THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before
WW (EEA Regs. civil partnership) Thailand [2009] UKAIT 00014 Asylum and Immigration Tribunal THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House On 9 February 2009 Before SENIOR IMMIGRATION JUDGE P R LANE SENIOR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: R. v. Moman (R.), 2011 MBCA 34 Date: 20110413 Docket: AR 10-30-07421 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) C. J. Mainella and ) O. A. Siddiqui (Respondent) Applicant
More informationDECISION AND REASONS
IAC-FH-AR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/00094/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 15 February 2016 On 8 March 2016
More informationNo. 44,995-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Ryan E. Gatti, Workers Compensation Judge * * * * *
Judgment rendered March 3, 2010. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 44,995-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * GRAMBLING
More informationFST FINANCIALSERVICES. KEITH BRYAN WESTERGAARD and GET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION REGISTRAR OF MORTGAGE BROKERS APPEAL DECISION
FST-05-017 FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL In the matter of Mortgage Brokers Act R.S.B.C. 1996, C. 313 BETWEEN: KEITH BRYAN WESTERGAARD and GET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION APPELLANT AND: REGISTRAR OF MORTGAGE BROKERS
More informationArbitration CAS 2015/A/4272 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Sri Lanka Anti-Doping Agency (SLADA) & Rishan Pieris, award of 31 March 2016
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4272 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Sri Lanka Anti-Doping Agency (SLADA) & Rishan Pieris, Panel: Mr Alexander McLin
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) ) ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) Judgment on Motion for Determination of a Question of Law
CITATION: Skunk v. Ketash et al., 2017 ONSC 4457 COURT FILE NO.: CV-14-0382 DATE: 2017-07-25 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: CHRISTOHPER SKUNK Plaintiff - and - LAUREL KETASH and JEVCO
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CONWAY. Between. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Appellant and DECISION AND REASONS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 24 January 2018 On 05 April 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CONWAY Between THE
More informationArbitration CAS 2012/A/2786 FC Spartak a.s v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 29 August 2012
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2786 FC Spartak a.s v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom),
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Zappia v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 185 Appeal from: Zappia v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCA 390 File number: NSD 709 of 2017 Judges: ROBERTSON, PAGONE AND BROMWICH
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House (Taylor House) Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 October 2015 On 3 November 2015.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House (Taylor House) Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 October 2015 On 3 November 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationDESIRING to intensify the economic cooperation for the mutual benefit of the Contracting Parties;
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United
More informationIN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 (APPEAL ARISING FROM THE DECISION OF THE ENERGY AND WATER
IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 Dar es Salaam Water and Sewerage Authority (DAWASA) VERSUS Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority (EWURA) APPELLANT
More informationASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL
ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL ML (student; satisfactory progress ; Zhou explained) Mauritius [2007] UKAIT 00061 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House 2007 Date of Hearing: 19 June Before: Senior
More informationIN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG BILLION GROUP (PTY) LTD
IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable Case no: JA 64/2016 In the matter between: BILLION GROUP (PTY) LTD Appellant and MOTHUSI MOSHESHE First Respondent COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION
More informationArbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Draft for public consultation 26 April 2016 Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of
More informationIN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2010] NZEMPC 144 CRC 25/10. DEREK WAYNE GILBERT Applicant
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2010] NZEMPC 144 CRC 25/10 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND application for leave to file challenge out of time DEREK WAYNE GILBERT Applicant TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NEW
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/01880/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/01880/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 January 2018 On 08 February 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. ARCELORMITTAL POINT LISAS LIMITED (formerly CARIBBEAN ISPAT LIMITED) Appellant AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 211 of 2009 BETWEEN ARCELORMITTAL POINT LISAS LIMITED (formerly CARIBBEAN ISPAT LIMITED) Appellant AND STEEL WORKERS UNION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Glasgow Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 4 October 2017 On 20 November Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CONWAY
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Glasgow Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 4 October 2017 On 20 November 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CONWAY Between MRS
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 25 November 2015 On 3 February Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/43643/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 25 November 2015 On 3 February 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA256/05. ANTHONY ARBUTHNOT Respondent. William Young P, Arnold and Ellen France JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA256/05 BETWEEN AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WORK AND INCOME Appellant ANTHONY ARBUTHNOT Respondent Hearing: 24 August 2006 Court: Counsel: William
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at : IAC Manchester Decision & Reasons Promulgated On : 4 May 2016 On : 13 May Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at : IAC Manchester Decision & Reasons Promulgated On : 4 May 2016 On : 13 May 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE Between
More informationOmbudsman s Determination
Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondent Ms G Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) Humber Bridge Board (the Board) Outcome 1. I do not uphold Ms G s complaint and no further action is required
More informationSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Applicant
CITATION: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. TD Home & Auto Insurance Company, 2016 ONSC 6229 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-555100 DATE: 20161222 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ONTARIO RE: STATE FARM
More informationSTUDENT APPEALS. The purpose of this policy is to provide a process for hearing student appeals.
Policy and Procedures Manual Policy #3-30 Approved By: Education Council Approval Date: March 26, 1997 Revision Date: June 2002 June 10, 2011 October 16, 2015 Effective Date: October 16, 2015 Date to be
More informationUnreported Opinion. G.G., appellant, filed, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, a petition for
Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-FM-17-003630 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2475 September Term, 2017 IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF A.M. & A.M Meredith, Shaw Geter,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Squires v President of Industrial Court Qld [2002] QSC 272 PARTIES: FILE NO: S3990 of 2002 DIVISION: PHILLIP ALAN SQUIRES (applicant/respondent) v PRESIDENT OF INDUSTRIAL
More informationThe Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Republic of Belarus, hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties,"
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United Mexican
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: OA/03496/2014 OA/03497/2014 OA/03500/2014 OA/03504/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: OA/03496/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 24 th March 2015 Prepared on
More informationIN THE TAX COURT. [1] This is an appeal referred to this court in terms of section 83A(13)(a) of
JUDGMENT IN THE TAX COURT CASE NO: 11398 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B H MBHA PRESIDENT Y WAJA E TAYOB In the matter between: ACCOUNTANT MEMBER COMMERCIAL MEMBER Appellant and THE COMMISSIONER FOR
More informationArbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this contract, or the
More informationArbitration CAS 2005/A/899 FC Aris Thessaloniki v. FIFA & New Panionios N.F.C., award of 15 July 2005
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2005/A/899 award of 15 July 2005 Panel: Mr Beat Hodler (Switzerland), President; Mr Jean-Philippe Rochat (Switzerland); Mr Michele
More informationIndexed as: Rano v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Between: Teresa Rano, applicant, and Commercial Union Assurance Company, insurer
Page 1 Indexed as: Rano v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Between: Teresa Rano, applicant, and Commercial Union Assurance Company, insurer [1999] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 134 File No. FSCO A97-001056 Ontario Financial
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1679/11
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1679/11 BEFORE: G. Dee : Vice-Chair M. Christie: Member representative of Employers M. Ferarri : Member representative of Workers HEARING: August
More informationCitation: Ayangma v. P.E.I. Human Rights Commission Date: PESCAD 20 Docket: AD-0863 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Ayangma v. P.E.I. Human Rights Commission Date: 20000619 2000 PESCAD 20 Docket: AD-0863 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION BETWEEN:
More informationReasons and decision Motifs et décision
Reasons and decision Motifs et décision RAD File No. / N de dossier de la SAR : VB3-02197 Private Proceeding / Huis clos Person(s) who is(are) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Personne(s) en cause the subject of the
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 February 2016 On 12 February Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 February 2016 On 12 February 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SAFFER
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CITATION: Volpe v. Co-operators General Insurance Company, 2017 ONSC 261 COURT FILE NO.: 13-42024 DATE: 2017-01-13 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: Vicky Volpe A. Rudder, for the Plaintiff/Respondent
More informationCanberra, 12 November Entry into force, 14 March 2007 AUSTRALIAN TREATY SERIES [2007] ATS 22
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS Canberra, 12 November 2002 Entry into
More informationNoteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT Panel: Herb Morton Decision Date: August 6, 2004
Decision Number: -2004-04157 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: -2004-04157 Panel: Herb Morton Decision Date: August 6, 2004 What constitutes a reviewable decision respecting compensation Review Division
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO
COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NO. 9-99-82 v. STACEY MILLER O P I N I O N DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal appeal from
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE REEDS. Between. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent DECISION AND REASONS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) EA/00076/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at North Shields Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 24 th October 2018 On 7 th November 2018 Before
More informationARBITRATION ACT B.E.2545 (2002) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on the 23rd Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign.
ARBITRATION ACT B.E.2545 (2002) ------- BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on the 23rd Day of April B.E. 2545; Being the 57th Year of the Present Reign. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously pleased
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL MAINTENANCE TRAINING AND SECURITY COMPANY LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA No. 207 of 1997 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION Appellant NATIONAL MAINTENANCE TRAINING AND SECURITY COMPANY LIMITED
More informationArbitration CAS 2013/A/3283 Fudbalski klub Partizan v. Sao Caetano Futebol LTDA, award of 1 April 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2013/A/3283 award of 1 April 2014 Panel: Prof. Martin Schimke (Germany), President; Mr Bernhard Heusler (Switzerland); Mr David
More information