IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
|
|
- Dina Daniels
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Citation: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Date: Manitoba v Kochanowski et al, 2018 MBCA 2 Docket: AI IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA B ETWEEN : HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT ) D. G. Guénette and OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA ) T. B. Dobson ) for the Applicant Applicant ) ) G. Kochanowski and ) C. Kochanowski - and - ) on their own behalf ) ) Chambers motion heard: GARY KOCHANOWSKI and CINDY ) December 14, 2017 KOCHANOWSKI ) ) Decision pronounced: Respondents ) January 11, 2018 MARC M. MONNIN JA [1] The applicant applies for leave to appeal a decision of the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board (the Board) pursuant to section 12.4(2) of The Water Resources Administration Act, CCSM c W70 (the Act). That section provides for an appeal to this Court from a specific type of decision of the Board, but only on a question of law and with leave granted by a judge of this Court. [2] As this is the first time such a leave application has been heard by this Court under that statute, I will provide more background than I normally would on an application for leave.
2 Page: 2 Background [3] This application arises from a claim made by the respondents, property owners near the Shellmouth Dam (the dam) in Western Manitoba. The claim is brought under a program known as the Shellmouth Dam Compensation Program (the Program), established under the Act and regulations made under it. As explained by the applicant in its thorough material supporting the application, the Program s purpose is to offer one possible avenue for landowners to obtain a specified category of flood-related compensation as opposed to commencing a lawsuit. Shellmouth Dam [4] The dam is a flood-related structure built with the intent to alleviate the consequences of the disastrous flood of 1950, the construction of which created a body of water now known as Lake of the Prairies. In essence, it is a reservoir controlled by the structure. While initially constructed to control flooding conditions, the reservoir now serves as a source for irrigation and water for downstream communities, as well as providing a recreational venue. The operation of the dam is therefore subject to a number of interests and is supervised by the Province of Manitoba in consultation with an advisory committee on which representatives of the various interests participate. The Program [5] The Program, established under the Act, compensates landowners affected by artificial flooding which is defined in section 12.1(1) of the Act. For ease of reference, I have attached the relevant sections of the Act, the Manitoba, Shellmouth Dam Regulation, Man Reg 13/2011, the Manitoba,
3 Page: 3 Shellmouth Dam Compensation Regulation, Man Reg 14/2011 (the Compensation Regulation), and The Emergency Measures Act, CCSM c E80, as an appendix hereto. [6] Once a person makes a claim under the Act, the Emergency Measures Organization (EMO) is in charge of the investigation and initial decision of the claim pursuant to section 12.2(2). For the purpose of the Program, artificial flooding occurs where the operation of the dam causes the Assiniboine River to exceed its unregulated level, which is defined in the Act as the scientifically demonstrable level that would be expected in [the Assiniboine River] at a given time in the absence of the designated water control work (at section 1). The Claim [7] The respondents claim that their property was affected by the operation of the dam. They claimed to have suffered a loss due to flooding in 2011 and 2012 and submitted a claim for compensation under the Program for those two years. They were awarded compensation for the 2011 flooding, but were denied coverage for anything in The letter from the EMO gives no explanation for the denial for the 2012 year, although the evidence put forward before me, and also the Board, was that EMO retained the services of an adjusting firm which concluded that the canola crop, seeded by the respondents in 2012, was flooded by water levels which would have occurred naturally irrespective of the dam s operation. Therefore, in EMO s estimation, there was no damage caused by artificial flooding as defined by the Act and regulations. [8] The respondents appealed to the Board.
4 Page: 4 [9] As part of its leave application material, the applicant provided copies of what was filed by it to the Board on the appeal, as well as what it provided to the Board at the hearing. This includes the 2012 Report on Artificial Flooding due to Operation of the Shellmouth Dam prepared by Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation pursuant to section 12.7(1) of the Act (the 2012 Report). This section requires the Minister, if he/she determines that damage has occurred due to artificial flooding, to cause a report to be made setting out the extent and duration of the artificial flooding. The applicant says that this report goes only to the issue of whether damage had occurred due to the dam s operation in the overall sense, but does not identify the damage or the specific locations of where it occurred. [10] In its material before the Board, the applicant filed hydrographs depicting what it submitted was the extent of the water levels of both regulated and unregulated flows for the period of May 15 to August 7, By these hydrographs, it sought to depict the level of artificial flooding on the property owned by the respondents during that time period and to extrapolate for the Board the lengths of time that the property was subject to artificial flooding. The extent of flooding was based upon water levels on the property and the heights of the property which data had been obtained using radar from a 2008 study (LiDAR). As well, the applicant presented evidence to the Board that canola seed would die under water after three days. It submitted that the hydrographs provided evidence that natural flooding occurred on the respondents farm for a period longer than three days before any period of artificial flooding occurred, meaning that there was no damage caused to the respondents property by artificial flooding due to the operation of the dam.
5 Page: 5 [11] In an exchange with the Board as part of the applicant s opening statement, the Board Chairperson confirmed his understanding that what was at issue was causation. [12] The Board issued its decision wherein it set out in abbreviated form the position of the parties and the information it received from them. Its conclusion was as follows: The Board, after carefully reviewing the presentations, the summaries and the Exhibits, determined that on the balance of probability, more likely than not, the farm of Cindy and Gary Kochanowski incurred considerable flood damages due to the 2012 Shellmouth Dam Artificial operations, and decided to allow the appeal. [13] It noted that it relied upon comments found in the 2012 Report. It mentioned the requirements of section 9 of the Compensation Regulation which requires the EMO to inspect a claimant s damaged property and obtain information concerning the damage. It concluded that the EMO did not take these steps with respect to the respondents property. It allowed the 2012 claim and referred the matter back to the EMO for them to determine the appropriate compensation award in accordance with the normal claims management process. [14] The applicant says that, in the circumstances, the Board: a) failed to properly interpret and apply the definition of artificial flooding as set out in the Act; b) failed to properly interpret and apply the definition of economic loss as used in the Act;
6 Page: 6 c) exceeded its jurisdiction by awarding compensation on the basis of the Minister s policy decision and the EMO s claim administration process in the absence of any evidence of damage caused by artificial flooding; and d) did not provide sufficient reasons for its decision. Law With Respect to Leave Applications [15] The applicant concedes that this application is governed by this Court s accepted test for granting leave to appeal taking into consideration the statutory context of the Act. That test is set out in the jurisprudence of this Court and has three aspects: 1) does the applicant raise a question of law or jurisdiction? 2) do the questions raise an arguable case of substance which have a reasonable chance of success? 3) are the questions of sufficient importance to warrant consideration by this Court? See Pelchat v Manitoba Public Insurance Corp and Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission, 2006 MBCA 90; and Manitoba Housing v Gabriel et al, 2017 MBCA 64. Analysis [16] I am not convinced that the applicant s grounds of appeal raise issues of law alone or an excess of jurisdiction which would allow me to grant leave to appeal.
7 Page: 7 [17] The first two grounds suggest an error of law in the interpretation and the application of sections of the Act which form part of the Board s constituent statute. While the sections are not referenced in the Board s decision, on these types of applications, I must consider what was before the Board in terms of submissions and material. It is clear that the applicant s counsel put before the Board the relevant statutory criteria set out in the Act and the applicant s submission as to how it should be interpreted and applied based upon the evidence. [18] The Board s decision does not lead to the conclusion that it refused to interpret the Act in the manner suggested, only that the evidence convinced it that the test had been met. At best, these are issues of mixed fact and law which this Court has indicated time and time again that it will not review. Issues based upon evidentiary considerations are within the sole purview of the administrative tribunal (see Harder v Director Fort Garry/River Heights, 2017 MBCA 11). [19] The next ground of appeal alleging excess of jurisdiction suffers from the same problem. It raises allegations that the Board considered irrelevant matters or did not have any evidence before it to reach the conclusion it did. In fact, the Minister s declaration was not just a policy decision as suggested by the applicant. It could be used as evidence of a factual determination with respect to damages caused by the operation of the dam. I agree that it could not be used as evidence of specific damage to the respondents property, but it was nevertheless evidence before the Board which was relevant to its decision.
8 Page: 8 [20] Consideration of the EMO s administration process and how it administered this specific claim was also relevant to the Board s consideration. The issue of whether there was any evidence of damage caused by artificial flooding is the specific issue left to the Board and is not an issue of law alone. [21] As to the final ground of appeal, the sufficiency of the Board s reasons, I understand the applicant s frustration in not having been provided with reasons that deal specifically with points that were raised by it before the Board. However, the Board need not address all the issues raised by the parties. Suffiency of reasons is rarely, if ever, a stand-alone ground of appeal. It must be coupled with other matters in order to substantiate that the decision of the board under review is unreasonable (see Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 at paras 14, 16). [22] That is not to say that the Board should be commended for its reasons. While they may have survived this application for leave to appeal, in other circumstances where other factors are at play, a lack of adequate reasons may well give this Court reason to review the Board s decisions. [23] For these reasons, I have concluded that leave to appeal should be dismissed. Monnin JA
9 APPENDIX A The Water Resources Administration Act, CCSM c W70: Definitions 1 In this Act artificial flooding, in relation to a given event, means flooding of a water body (a) that is caused by the operation of a designated water control work, or the operation of a designated water control work and one or more other water control works, and (b) whereby the water body exceeds its unregulated level at the time of the event; damage, in relation to eligible property, means that the property (a) is physically destroyed, or (b) due to submersion or physical damage, is rendered inoperable, less useful, less valuable, less productive or hazardous to human or animal health; designated water control work means (a) the Shellmouth Dam, or (b) any other water control work designated in the regulations for the purpose of this definition, not including the floodway as defined in The Red River Floodway Act insofar as it relates to spring flooding as defined in that Act; economic loss means, subject to the regulations,
10 Page: ii (a) wages, salary or business income that a person loses because he or she cannot work or carry on business due to artificial flooding, and (b) extraordinary costs and expenses of working or carrying on business that a person incurs due to artificial flooding; unregulated level, in relation to artificial flooding, means the scientifically demonstrable level that would be expected in the water body at a given time (a) in the absence of the designated water control work, or (b) if specified by regulation in respect of the water body, in the absence of the designated water control work and one or more other specified water control works; Claims for artificial flood damage and economic loss 12.1(1) A person may claim compensation under section 12.2 if (a) artificial flooding has damaged the person s eligible property or caused the person to have an economic loss; and (b) the person meets any applicable eligibility requirements set out in the regulations. Eligible economic loss 12.1(3) A person may claim compensation under section 12.2 for economic loss caused by artificial flooding only if the economic loss occurs in Manitoba and, (a) in the case of a loss that results from artificial flood damage to real property that the person owns or leases or in which the person resides, only if all applicable floodproofing criteria in relation to the damaged property have been complied with at the time the loss occurs; and (b) in the case of a loss that results from artificial flood damage to personal property that the person owns or leases, only if all applicable floodproofing criteria in relation to the land, building or structure where
11 Page: iii the damaged property is located have been complied with at the time the loss occurs. Application for compensation 12.2(1) A person who wishes to claim compensation must file an application for compensation in accordance with the regulations and must comply with the other requirements of the regulations. Emergency Measures Organization determines claims 12.2(2) After a person files a compensation application and complies with the requirements of the regulations, the Emergency Measures Organization must (a) determine whether the claimant meets any applicable eligibility requirements set out in the regulations; (b) if the claim relates to property damage, determine whether artificial flooding damaged the property and whether it is eligible property; (c) if the claim relates to economic loss, determine whether artificial flooding caused the loss and whether it is an eligible loss; (d) assess the value of the damage or loss; (e) evaluate whether and to what extent the claimant may be entitled to receive assistance or compensation under another program of the Government of Manitoba or Canada or a local government; and (f) determine the amount of compensation to be awarded under this Act in respect of the damaged property or loss. Appeals 12.4(1) A person whose application for compensation is partly or wholly refused or who disagrees with any part of a determination, assessment or evaluation under subsection 12.2(2) may appeal to the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board appointed under The Emergency Measures Act. Appeal to Court of Appeal 12.4(2) A decision of the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board under subsection (1) may be appealed upon a question of law to The Court of Appeal with leave granted by a judge of that court.
12 Page: iv Application for leave to appeal 12.4(3) An application for leave to appeal must (a) state the grounds of the appeal; and (b) be made within 30 days after the date of the decision sought to be appealed, or within such further time as the judge under special circumstances allows. Notice of the application must be served on the government in accordance with section 11 of The Proceedings Against the Crown Act. Government to provide compensation 12.5 When a person is awarded compensation because of a determination under subsection 12.2(2) or an appeal decision under section 12.4, the government must provide the person with compensation in the amount awarded, subject to any applicable provisions of the regulations. Report on occurrence of damage or loss due to artificial flooding 12.7(1) If the minister determines that damage to eligible property or economic loss has occurred due to artificial flooding, the minister must make, or cause to be made, a report that sets out the extent and duration of the artificial flooding. Shellmouth Dam Regulation, Man Reg 13/2011 Artificial flooding report 3(1) An artificial flooding report in relation to artificial flooding caused by the operation of the Shellmouth Dam must include the following information: (a) a statement of the period reported on; (b) a statement that the minister has determined that damage to eligible property or economic loss has occurred during the reporting period due to artificial flooding caused by the operation of the Shellmouth Dam; (c) charts showing, for the reporting period, regulated and unregulated
13 Page: v (i) discharges from the Shellmouth Dam, and (ii) water levels for the Assiniboine River at relevant hydrometric monitoring stations; (d) charts showing the dates that artificial flooding began and ended for each relevant hydrometric monitoring station; (e) a description as to how the regulated and unregulated levels were determined; (f) a description of all Shellmouth Dam operations and any technical issues that arose during the reporting period; (g) if operating guidelines have been approved for the operation of the Shellmouth Dam, a statement as to whether the dam was operated in a manner consistent with the guidelines during the entire reporting period, and if not, a description of the time period and circumstances in which it was operated in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines; (h) a tabulation showing all Shellmouth Dam gate adjustments during the reporting period, including (i) the date and time of each adjustment, (ii) the reservoir water level and the volume of water stored in the reservoir, at the time of each adjustment, and (iii) the riparian outlet flow, spillway flow and total outflow resulting from each adjustment. Shellmouth Dam Compensation Regulation, Man Reg 14/2011: Definitions 1 The following definitions apply in this regulation. artificial flooding means artificial flooding of the Assiniboine River caused by the operation of the Shellmouth Dam.
14 Page: vi artificial flooding report means an artificial flooding report within the meaning of the Shellmouth Dam Regulation. compensation means compensation within the meaning of sections 12.1 to 12.6 of the Act. Appeal to the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board 11(1) A claimant who wishes to appeal to the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board under subsection 12.4(1) of the Act must file an appeal application with the board in the form and with the information the board requires. The appeal application must be filed within 90 days after the date of the compensation statement setting out the compensation award being appealed, or within any longer period that the board allows. 11(10) The board may receive information and documentation under oath, affirmation, declaration or otherwise, and is not bound by the rules of law respecting evidence that apply to judicial proceedings. 11(12) In making its decision about an appeal the board is bound by sections 12.1 to 12.6 of the Act and by this regulation. The board must follow the valuation procedure used by the Emergency Measures Organization unless it is satisfied that another valuation procedure is more appropriate and fair, having regard to the nature of the claimant's property damage or economic loss. 11(13) After a hearing or other consideration of an appeal, the board may, by order, (a) allow the appeal in whole or in part and award compensation to the claimant in a higher amount than the original compensation award or for an item not included in the original compensation award; or (b) dismiss the appeal and confirm the original compensation award.
15 Page: vii The Emergency Measures Act, CCSM c E80: Establishment of Disaster Assistance Appeal Board 17(1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council shall appoint a board to be known as the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board consisting of three or more persons. Disaster assistance appeal 17(6) A claimant may appeal a decision of the Emergency Measures Organization respecting claims for specific losses or expenses for disaster assistance to the Disaster Assistance Appeal Board. Duties of board 17(7) The Disaster Assistance Appeal Board shall (a) set a fee payable by an appellant for the hearing of an appeal; (b) hear appeals from the disposition of claims for disaster assistance by the Emergency Measures Organization; and (c) dispose of an appeal by confirming, varying or setting aside the decision of the Emergency Measures Organization with respect to disaster assistance.
Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: 20121113 (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI 12-30-07792 Coram: B E T W E E N : IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Madam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: R. v. Moman (R.), 2011 MBCA 34 Date: 20110413 Docket: AR 10-30-07421 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) C. J. Mainella and ) O. A. Siddiqui (Respondent) Applicant
More informationSOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division
Citation: S. V. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2016 SSTADIS 87 Tribunal File Number: AD-15-1088 BETWEEN: S. V. Appellant and Minister of Employment and Social Development (formerly known
More informationThe Public Health Appeals Regulations
PUBLIC HEALTH APPEALS P-37.1 REG 8 1 The Public Health Appeals Regulations being Chapter P-37.1 Reg 8 (effective May 5, 1999) as amended by Saskatchewan Regulations 113/2017; and by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Applicant
CITATION: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. TD Home & Auto Insurance Company, 2016 ONSC 6229 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-555100 DATE: 20161222 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ONTARIO RE: STATE FARM
More informationAGRICULTURE FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT
Province of Alberta AGRICULTURE FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter A-12 Current as of December 15, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen
More informationExaminations for discovery Income Tax Act. Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act. Consideration on application. Mandatory examination
1 Examinations for discovery Income Tax Act Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act Consideration on application Mandatory examination LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS RELATED TO IMPROVING THE CASELOAD MANAGEMENT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Squires v President of Industrial Court Qld [2002] QSC 272 PARTIES: FILE NO: S3990 of 2002 DIVISION: PHILLIP ALAN SQUIRES (applicant/respondent) v PRESIDENT OF INDUSTRIAL
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 APPEAL
More informationThe Revenue and Financial Services Act
1 The Revenue and Financial Services Act being Chapter R-22.01 (formerly The Department of Revenue and Financial Services Act, D-22.02) of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1983 (effective May 18, 1983) as
More informationCITATION: H.M. The Queen in Right of Ontario v. Axa Insurance Canada, 2017 ONSC 3414 COURT FILE NO.: CV DATE: ONTARIO
CITATION: H.M. The Queen in Right of Ontario v. Axa Insurance Canada, 2017 ONSC 3414 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-553910 DATE: 20170601 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER of the Insurance Act, R.S.O.
More informationMINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE. and ROBERT MCNALLY. Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
CORAM: NEAR J.A. DE MONTIGNY J.A. Date: 20151106 Docket: A-358-15 Citation: 2015 FCA 248 BETWEEN: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and Appellant ROBERT MCNALLY Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance
More informationCitation: Larry Penner Enterprises Inc v The Deputy Minister Date: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: Larry Penner Enterprises Inc v The Deputy Minister Date: 20180821 of Finance (Manitoba), 2018 MBCA 78 Docket: AI17-30-08962 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Coram: Madam Justice Freda M. Steel
More informationOrder No. 72/18. June 6, BEFORE: Robert Gabor, Q.C., Chair Marilyn Kapitany, B.Sc., (Hon), M.Sc., Vice-Chair Larry Ring, Q.C.
AN APPLICATION BY MANITOBA HYDRO FOR STAYS OF CERTAIN DIRECTIVES FROM ORDERS 59/18 AND 68/18 PENDING DETERMINATION OF MANITOBA HYDRO S REVIEW AND VARY APPLICATION BEFORE: Robert Gabor, Q.C., Chair Marilyn
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: Citation: City of St. John's v. St. John's International Airport Authority, 2017 NLCA 21 Date: March 27, 2017 Docket: 201601H0002
More informationBYLAW NO The Saskatoon Licence Appeal Board Bylaw, 2012
BYLAW NO. 9036 The Saskatoon Licence Appeal Board Bylaw, 2012 Whereas under the provisions of clause 8(1)(h) of The Cities Act, a city has the general power to pass any bylaws that it considers expedient
More informationREPORT Nova Scotia Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Report of Review Officer Dulcie McCallum FI-10-49/FI-10-51
Report Release Date: April 6, 2011 REPORT Nova Scotia Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Report of Review Officer Dulcie McCallum FI-10-49/FI-10-51 Public Body: Issues: Department of Labour
More informationNoteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT AD Panel: Jill Callan, Chair Decision Date: July 30, 2003
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2003-01800-AD Panel: Jill Callan, Chair Decision Date: July 30, 2003 Lawfulness of Policy - Sections 33(1) and 251 of the Workers Compensation Act - Item #67.21
More informationCitation: Layton Eldon Manning v. The Queen Date: PESCAD 26 Docket: AD-0861 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Layton Eldon Manning v. The Queen Date: 20011101 2001 PESCAD 26 Docket: AD-0861 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION BETWEEN: LAYTON
More informationThe Agricultural Safety Net Act
1 AGRICULTURAL SAFETY NET c. A-14.2 The Agricultural Safety Net Act being Chapter A-14.2 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1990-91 (effective April 30, 1991) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationFREEHOLD MINERAL RIGHTS TAX ACT
Province of Alberta FREEHOLD MINERAL RIGHTS TAX ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter F-26 Current as of November 30, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen
More informationAutomobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission
Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission IN THE MATTER OF an Appeal by [The Appellant] AICAC File No.: AC-12-157 PANEL: APPEARANCES: Jacqueline Freedman, Chairperson The Appellant, [text deleted],
More informationM A N I T O B A Order No. 44/11 THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT THE MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE ACT
M A N I T O B A Order No. 44/11 THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT THE MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE ACT THE CROWN CORPORATIONS PUBLIC REVIEW AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT March 31, 2011 Before: Graham Lane, CA, Chairman
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Doiron v. Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission 2011 PECA 9 Date: 20110603 Docket: S1-CA-1205 Registry: Charlottetown
More informationSTUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 15, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationOil and Gas Appeal Tribunal
Oil and Gas Appeal Tribunal Fourth Floor, 747 Fort Street Victoria BC V8W 3E9 Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 Website:
More informationV o l u m e I I C h a p t e r 5. Sections 10 and 11: Limitation of Actions, Elections, Subrogations and Certification to Court
V o l u m e I I C h a p t e r 5 Sections 10 and 11: Limitation of Actions, Elections, Subrogations and Certification to Court Contents Limitation of Actions Against Workers... 5 Exception to Limitation
More informationThe Mineral Resources Act, 1985
Consolidated to June 14, 2012 1 MINERAL RESOURCES, 1985 c. M-16.1 The Mineral Resources Act, 1985 being Chapter M-16.1 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1984-85-86 (effective July 1, 1985) as amended by
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION Citation: Trigen v. IBEW & Ano. 2002 PESCAD 16 Date: 20020906 Docket: S1-AD-0930 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: TRIGEN
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE M A HALL. Between LIDIJA DESPOTOVIC ANDJELA DESPOTOVIC (ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE) and
IAC-AH-VP/DP-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 th December 2015 On 6 th January 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationCase Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada)
Page 1 Case Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada) Between The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Applicant (Appellant in Appeal), and AXA Insurance (Canada), Respondent (Respondent
More information[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT )] Case Name: Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. Jurisdiction:
[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT-2010-0005)] Case Name: Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. Jurisdiction: Abstract: Canada Federal Court of Appeal The applicant sought to invalidate a
More informationArbitration Forums, Inc. Rules
Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules Effective June 15, 2013; Revision Effective November 1, 2013 The following rules are made and administered by Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) under the authority of Article
More informationChapter 3: Eligibility and Enrolment
Part 3.1 Definitions and Interpretation 3.1.1 In this chapter: "Appellant" means anyone who appeals a Committee decision under section 3.5.14 or 3.10.9; "Board" means the Inuit membership appeal board
More informationALBERTA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of June 12, 2013 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 25 July 2014 On 11 August 2014 Oral determination given following hearing. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/30481/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 25 July 2014 On 11 August 2014 Oral determination given
More informationHOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD. In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD. And
HOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD And PROVINCIAL HEALTH SERVICES AUTHORITY and THE CHILDREN S AND WOMEN S HEALTH CENTRE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DECISION ON DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS On January
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 17(2018)
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. (0) 0 0 IN THE MATTER OF the Electrical Power Control Act,, SNL, Chapter E-. (the EPCA ) and the Public
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02086/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02086/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 23 October 2017 On 25 October 2017 Before Deputy
More informationArbitration Forums, Inc. Rules
Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules Effective February 1, 2010 The following rules are made and administered by Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) under the authority of Article Fifth (a) of the various Arbitration
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CITATION: Hazaveh v. Pacitto, 2018 ONSC 395 COURT FILE NO.: CV-10-404841 DATE: 20180116 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: FARZAD BIKMOHAMMADI-HAZAVEH Plaintiff and RBC GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationAppeal Process Guide. Property Valuation Services Corporation phone: fax:
Appeal Process Guide Property Valuation Services Corporation phone: 1-800-380-7775 fax: 1-888-339-4555 web: WWW.PVSC.CA Last Revised December 2012 Property Valuation Services Corporation Effective April
More informationA GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS 2017 This document explains what to do to prepare and file a factum. It includes advice and best practices to help you.
More informationCitation: Ayangma v. P.E.I. Human Rights Commission Date: PESCAD 20 Docket: AD-0863 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Ayangma v. P.E.I. Human Rights Commission Date: 20000619 2000 PESCAD 20 Docket: AD-0863 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION BETWEEN:
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between NM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06052/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Newport Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 st March 2016 On 15 th April 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationCitation: Lambe v. Workers Comp. Bd. (P.E.I.) Date: PESCAD 6 Docket: AD-0880 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Lambe v. Workers Comp. Bd. (P.E.I.) Date: 20020315 2002 PESCAD 6 Docket: AD-0880 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION AND:
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Glasgow Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 4 October 2017 On 20 November Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CONWAY
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Glasgow Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 4 October 2017 On 20 November 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CONWAY Between MRS
More informationOIL SANDS CONSERVATION ACT
Province of Alberta OIL SANDS CONSERVATION ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of June 17, 2013 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700,
More information2012 SASKATCHEWAN CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION c. S CHAPTER S An Act respecting Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation
1 SASKATCHEWAN CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION c. S-12.1 CHAPTER S-12.1 An Act respecting Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Short Title and Interpretation 1 Short title 2 Interpretation
More informationCooper et al. v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Company [Indexed as: Cooper v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Co.]
Page 1 Cooper et al. v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Company [Indexed as: Cooper v. Farmer's Mutual Insurance Co.] 59 O.R. (3d) 417 [2002] O.J. No. 1949 Docket No. C37051 Court of Appeal for Ontario, Abella,
More informationBerries. Ministry of Agriculture
Berries Ministry of Agriculture www.gov.bc.ca/agribusinessriskmanagement Revised September 1st, 2013 CONTENTS BASIS AND TERM OF CONTRACT 1.1 Definitions 1.2 Contract Terms And Formation 1.3 Changes To
More informationJaff (s.120 notice; statement of additional grounds ) [2012] UKUT 00396(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Jaff (s.120 notice; statement of additional grounds ) [2012] UKUT 00396(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House On 21 August 2012 Determination Promulgated
More informationCHAPTER 83. Payday Loans Act
2nd SESSION, 63rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 58 ELIZABETH II, 2009 CHAPTER 83 (Bill No. 69) Payday Loans Act Honourable L. Gerard Greenan Attorney General GOVERNMENT BILL MICHAEL
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA338292015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated Heard on 10 th July 2017 On 17 th July 2017 Prepared
More informationPayday Loans Act. BE IT ENACTED by the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Prince Edward Island as follows:
Consultation Draft Payday Loans Act September 30, 2008 Payday Loans Act BE IT ENACTED by the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Prince Edward Island as follows: PART I
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 11 January 2018 On 12 January Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/12231/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 11 January 2018 On 12 January 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationBOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE
Revised: May 17, 2018 BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE Article I. Authorization. The Board of Assessment Review of New Castle County (hereinafter referred to as the Board
More informationWhat is workers compensation?
Workers Compensation Overview / HB 2764 John Shilts, Administrator Oregon Workers Compensation Division March 2, 2015 What is workers compensation? Social insurance Protects employers and employees from
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd January 2018 On 22 nd February Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/28692/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd January 2018 On 22 nd February 2018 Before
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SHIRLEY RORY and ETHEL WOODS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, FOR PUBLICATION July 6, 2004 9:05 a.m. v No. 242847 Wayne Circuit Court CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, also LC No.
More informationProvince of Alberta TOBACCO TAX ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter T-4. Current as of June 7, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta TOBACCO TAX ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of June 7, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Reportable Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT CASE no. D 137/2010 In the matter between: NEHAWU PT MAPHANGA First Applicant Second
More informationand HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Appeal heard on October 23, 2013, at Halifax, Nova Scotia By: The Honourable Justice Campbell J.
BETWEEN: WARD CARSON, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Docket: 2011-1382(IT)I Appellant, Respondent. Appeal heard on October 23, 2013, at Halifax, Nova Scotia Appearances: By: The Honourable Justice Campbell
More informationHOLY ALPHA AND OMEGA CHURCH OF TORONTO. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Date: 20090331 Docket: A-214-08 Citation: 2009 FCA 101 Present: BETWEEN: HOLY ALPHA AND OMEGA CHURCH OF TORONTO Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA256/05. ANTHONY ARBUTHNOT Respondent. William Young P, Arnold and Ellen France JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA256/05 BETWEEN AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WORK AND INCOME Appellant ANTHONY ARBUTHNOT Respondent Hearing: 24 August 2006 Court: Counsel: William
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before. Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Bagral. Between. and. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 28 July 2017 On 27 October 2017 Before Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Bagral Between
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Piccadilly Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 10 August 2017 On 14 August 2017
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU084772015 HU084812015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Piccadilly Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 10 August 2017 On 14 August
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 79/94 This appeal was heard on January 31, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: B.L. Cook : Vice-Chair, W.D. Jago : Member representative of employers,
More informationNOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: King s Corner Bar and Grille Ltd. v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2018 NSCA 9
NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: King s Corner Bar and Grille Ltd. v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2018 NSCA 9 Date: 20180129 Docket: CA 463483 Registry: Halifax Between: King s Corner Bar and
More informationReasons and decision Motifs et décision
Reasons and decision Motifs et décision RAD File No. / N de dossier de la SAR : VB3-02197 Private Proceeding / Huis clos Person(s) who is(are) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Personne(s) en cause the subject of the
More informationCITATION: Di Tomaso v. Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP, 2011 ONCA 469 DATE: DOCKET: C52945 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN Goudge, MacPhe
CITATION: Di Tomaso v. Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP, 2011 ONCA 469 DATE: 20110622 DOCKET: C52945 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN Goudge, MacPherson and Karakatsanis JJ.A. Antonio Di Tomaso Respondent/Plaintiff
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 7 October 2015 On 25 November Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN. Between
G Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 October 2015 On 25 November 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN
More informationIMMUNOVACCINE TECHNOLOGIES INC. and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on September 9, 2014.
Date: 20140911 Docket: A-171-13 Citation: 2014 FCA 196 CORAM: NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: IMMUNOVACCINE TECHNOLOGIES INC. Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia,
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, as amended, section 268 and Regulation 283/95 made thereunder;
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, as amended, section 268 and Regulation 283/95 made thereunder; AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, 1991 S.O. 1991, c. 17; as amended; AND
More informationGS (public funds tax credits) India [2010] UKUT 419 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before Senior Immigration Judge McKee. Between.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) GS (public funds tax credits) India [2010] UKUT 419 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Decided at: Field House promulgated On: 6 October 2010 Determination Before
More informationMurray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes
Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes I. Rationale for Residency Regulation The Council on Post-Secondary Education (CPE) has promulgated an administrative regulation
More informationCase 2:17-cv DAK Document 21 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH
Case 2:17-cv-00280-DAK Document 21 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH Kang Sik Park, M.D. v. Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER First American Title Insurance
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION Citation: UAP v. Oak Tree Auto Centre Inc. 2003 PESCAD 6 Date: 20030312 Docket: S1-AD-0919 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN:
More informationMANAGEMENT BODY OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION REGULATION
Province of Alberta ALBERTA HOUSING ACT MANAGEMENT BODY OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION REGULATION Alberta Regulation 243/1994 With amendments up to and including Alberta Regulation 141/2017 Office Consolidation
More informationDECISION ON EXPENSES
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: THOMAS WALDOCK Applicant and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON EXPENSES
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KELLY. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 24 th April 2017 On 17 th May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KELLY Between
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Sally Schwartz, Appellant v. No. 183 C.D. 2017 Argued October 17, 2017 Chester County Agricultural Land Preservation Board and Arborganic Acres Sally Schwartz
More informationTHE NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR GAZETTE
THE NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY PART II PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ST. JOHN S, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2017 NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR REGULATION NLR 37/17 NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR REGULATION
More informationSTATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF COMPENSATING USE & SPECIAL EXCISE TAX (ACCT. NO.: ) ASSESSMENTS AUDIT NO.:
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY RABRINDA CHOUDRY, and ) DEBJANI CHOUDRY, ) ) Defendants Below/Appellants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. CPU4-12-000076 ) STATE OF
More information2010 MANAGEMENT AND REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES c. M CHAPTER M-2.01
1 2010 MANAGEMENT AND REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES c. M-2.01 2010 CHAPTER M-2.01 An Act respecting the Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases and Adaptation to Climate Change TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 6 February 2018 On 7 March Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 6 February 2018 On 7 March 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A LEWIS
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
BETWEEN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada v. Intact Insurance Company, 2017 ONCA 381 DATE: 20170510 DOCKET: C62842 Juriansz, Brown and Miller JJ.A.
More informationTOURISM INDUSTRY ACT
c t TOURISM INDUSTRY ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to June 12, 2018. It is intended for information and reference
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Before: Taiga Works Wilderness Equipment Ltd. v. British Columbia (Director of Employment Standards), 2010 BCCA 364 The Taiga Works Wilderness
More informationINSURANCE LAW BULLETIN
INSURANCE LAW BULLETIN April 2010 ACCIDENT BENEFITS & LIMITATION PERIODS: REVISITED [The information below is provided as a service by Shillingtons LLP and is not intended to be legal advice. Those seeking
More informationTRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS
LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Date:
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 March 2018 On 27 April 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Court Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd July 2017 On 5 th July 2017 Before
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FH MARTIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 11, 2010 v No. 289747 Oakland Circuit Court SECURA INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC., LC No. 2008-089171-CZ
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 3 rd September 2015 On 14 th September Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KELLY.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/00465/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd September 2015 On 14 th September 2015 Before
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 Website:
More informationALBERTA PERSONAL INCOME TAX ACT
Province of Alberta ALBERTA PERSONAL INCOME TAX ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter A-30 Current as of July 1, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer
More informationSASKATCHEWAN TECHNOLOGY START-UP INCENTIVE BILL. No An Act respecting the Saskatchewan Technology Start-up Incentive TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 BILL No. 129 An Act respecting the Saskatchewan Technology Start-up Incentive TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Short title 2 Definitions 3 Interpretation PART 1 Preliminary Matters PART 2 Eligible Start-up Businesses
More information