Executive summary. Detailed discussion. EY Global Tax Alert Library

Transcription

1 22 December 2016 International Tax Alert US final regulations retroactively eliminate Section 367(d) s exception for foreign goodwill and going concern value and narrow Section 367(a) s active trade or business exception EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser: Executive summary US final Treasury regulations under Internal Revenue Code 1 Section (TD 9803) (the Final Regulations), published on 16 December 2016, eliminate the exception under Treas. Reg. Section 1.367(d)-1T(b) for outbound transfers of foreign goodwill and going concern value (FGGCV) and limit application of the active foreign trade or business (ATB) exception under Section 367(a)(3) to certain specified property (not including FGGV). For FGGCV, the Final Regulations require the US transferor to either recognize gain currently under Section 367(a) or elect into the deemed royalty regime of Section 367(d), thus subjecting to US taxation transfers that have not generally been subject to income or gain recognition under Section 367. The Final Regulations apply on a retroactive basis to transfers occurring on or after 14 September 2015, and to transfers occurring before that date resulting from entity classification elections filed on or after 14 September Detailed discussion With certain modifications discussed below, the Final Regulations generally adopt the proposed regulations (REG ) published on 16 September 2015 (the Proposed Regulations). Specifically, the Final Regulations: 1. Narrow Section 367(a)(3) s ATB exception to exclude FGGCV and eliminate the exception under Temp. Reg. Section 1.367(d)-1T(b) for FGGCV

2 2 International Tax Alert 2. Allow US transferors to apply Section 367(d) s deemed royalty regime to certain property that would otherwise be subject to gain recognition under Section 367(a) (including FGGCV) 3. Require generally deemed royalties under Section 367(d) to be included during the entire useful life of the transferred property (including any property for which the US transferor elects to apply Section 367(d)), but permit the US transferor to elect to instead include such amounts during the 20-year period beginning in the first tax year in which an inclusion is required 4. Require immediate gain recognition on the transfer of certain property denominated in foreign currency that previously qualified for the ATB exception 5. Change the valuation rules in Temp. Reg. Section 1.367(a)-1T to better coordinate the Treasury regulations under Sections 367 and 482 Changes related to FGGCV. The preamble states that Treasury received 19 comment letters concerning the Proposed Regulations, primarily focused on the proposed changes to the treatment of outbound transfers of FGGCV. Two comments supported the proposed changes, but the remainder requested the Proposed Regulations be withdrawn entirely or that, at a minimum, Treasury provide exceptions to the proposed rules in certain cases. Several comments challenged Treasury s ability to exercise its authority to promulgate regulations providing for immediate or deferred income recognition for outbound transfers of FGGCV, either in all or certain fact patterns. The preamble indicates that Treasury carefully considered all the comments received, but ultimately concluded that: (1) its proposed changes were consistent with the policies underlying Section 367; and (2) finalizing the proposed changes was an appropriate exercise of its authority to promulgate regulations in this area. In reaching this conclusion, the preamble notes, Treasury determined that the market context in which Section 367(d) was enacted has changed significantly following the enactment of Section 197 and promulgation of the entity classification regulations under Section In other words, according to the preamble, the stakes of outbound asset transfers are much higher today, which justifies, in Treasury s view, finalizing the proposed changes without providing relief for non-abusive fact patterns. For similar reasons, Treasury rejected requests to: (i) provide exceptions for certain industries or the incorporation of a long-standing branch; (ii) value FGGCV using a formulaic approach; and (iii) provide an exception for certain transfers to joint venture companies, particularly when the US transfer is going into business with an unrelated foreign person. Changes concerning the useful life of intangible property. The Final Regulations define the useful life of transferred intangible property during which deemed royalties must be included under Reg. Section 1.367(d)-1T(c)(1) as the entire period during which exploitation of the intangible property is reasonably anticipated to affect the determination of taxable income, as of the time of transfer. For this purpose, the Final Regulations provide that exploitation of the transferred property includes any direct or indirect use or transfer of the intangible property, including use in the further development of the intangible property itself and in the development [and exploitation] of other intangible property If the useful life of the transferred property is indefinite or is reasonably anticipated to exceed 20 years, the Final Regulations permit taxpayers to elect, in the year of transfer, to instead take all the required inclusions into account during the 20-year period that begins with the first year in which the US transferor takes a Section 367(d) inclusion into account. Taxpayers making this election must increase their projected income inclusions to recognize the entire present value of the transferred property during the 20-year period. If this election is made, generally no adjustments to income with respect to the transferred property will be made outside the 20-year period; the Commissioner may, however, take into account information regarding tax years after that 20-year period (including income attributable to the transferred property during the later years). This election must be made on a timely filed return of the year of the transfer. The Final Regulations include an example illustrating how the general rule and the 20-year exception apply, including when other property derived from the transferred property is exploited. See Treas. Reg. Section 1.367(d)-1(c)(3)(iii), Example.

3 International Tax Alert 3 Implications The Final Regulations adopt broad-reaching changes to the treatment of outbound transfers of certain property, particularly FGGCV, which will result in immediate gain recognition or, at the transferor s election, annual inclusions over the useful life of the transferred property. These rules will apply equally in connection with an outbound transfer described in Section 351 or 361. It is unfortunate Treasury could not identify any non-abusive fact patterns and promulgate an exception for FGGCV generated and transferred in such contexts. The complexity and difficulty of formulating an exception should not be a reason for requiring recognition in all cases. The 20-year useful life safe harbor could provide some certainty by limiting the period that inclusions are required, but taxpayers must still recognize the entire present value of the transferred property through larger income inclusions during the shorter period and determining the proper amount to include may create challenges. Further, the election to use the 20-year safe harbor must be made on a timely filed return, and the Final Regulations provide no remediation for untimely or otherwise defective elections. In addition, taxpayers must now account for the use of the transferred property in the development and exploitation of other intangible property (i.e. derivative works), which could lengthen the useful life of the transferred property and the required income inclusions under Section 367(d). Finally, taxpayers that completed outbound transfers of property (including FGGCV) on or after 14 September 2015, must determine the effect of the Final Regulations on previously reported transactions. While the 20-year useful life safe harbor will provide some certainty, taxpayers must still recognize the entire present value of the transferred property through larger income inclusions in the shorter period. Further, the election to use the 20-year safe harbor must be made on a timely filed return, and the Final Regulations provide no remediation for untimely or otherwise defective elections. In addition, taxpayers must now also account for the use of the transferred property in the development and exploitation of other intangible property (i.e., derivative works), which could lengthen the useful life of the transferred property and the required income inclusions under Section 367(d). Finally, taxpayers that completed outbound transfers of property (including FGGCV) on or after 14 September 2015, must determine the effect of the Final Regulations on previously reported transactions. Endnote 1. All Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

4 4 International Tax Alert For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following: Ernst and Young LLP, International Tax Services, Washington DC Jose Murillo Peg O Connor margaret.oconnor@ey.com Ernst and Young LLP, Transfer Pricing Controversy Services, Washington DC David Canale david.canale@ey.com Ken Christman kenneth.christmanjr@ey.com Thomas Vidano thomas.vidano@ey.com Carlos Mallo carlos.mallo@ey.com International Tax Services Global ITS, Alex Postma, Tokyo ITS Director, Americas, Jeffrey Michalak, Detroit ITS Markets Leader, Americas, Stephen O Neil, New York Ernst & Young LLP, National Director of ITS Technical Services, Jose Murillo, Washington ITS Regional Contacts, Ernst & Young LLP (US) Northeast Johnny Lindroos, McLean, VA Financial Services Chris J Housman, New York Central Mark Mukhtar, Detroit Southeast Scott Shell, Charlotte, NC Southwest Amy Ritchie, Austin West Beth Carr, San Jose, CA Canada Ernst & Young LLP (Canada) Albert Anelli, Montreal

5 EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. About Ernst & Young s International Tax Services practices Our dedicated international tax professionals assist our clients with their cross-border tax structuring, planning, reporting and risk management. We work with you to build proactive and truly integrated global tax strategies that address the tax risks of today s businesses and achieve sustainable growth. It s how Ernst & Young makes a difference. International Tax Services 2016 EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved. EYG no US NY ED None This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice. ey.com