US taxpayers seeking unilateral APAs with Mexico for maquiladoras will not be subject to double taxation as long as certain requirements are met

Transcription

1 20 October 2016 International Tax Alert News from Transfer Pricing US taxpayers seeking unilateral APAs with Mexico for maquiladoras will not be subject to double taxation as long as certain requirements are met EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser: The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on 14 October 2016 (IR ) announced that US taxpayers seeking unilateral advance pricing agreements (APAs) with Mexico for their maquiladora operations will not be exposed to double taxation as long as the intercompany pricing is under the framework to which the US and Mexican competent authorities have agreed in advance. Detailed discussion Maquiladora structures Maquiladoras are Mexican companies that engage in export manufacturing operations with foreign residents that provide the inventory and M&E required to manufacture finished products owned by the foreign residents. The maquiladoras charge a manufacturing service fee, which is usually based on the costs of the maquiladora, plus a mark-up. To the extent that the maquiladoras comply with certain requirements, the foreign residents engaging in manufacturing operations through those companies are not considered to have a permanent establishment in Mexico. Among one of the new requirements applicable to maquiladoras starting from 1 January 2014, is that the service fee charged to the foreign resident is determined in accordance with any the following alternatives:

2 2 International Tax Alert News from Transfer Pricing 1. The Safe Harbor method, which requires the maquiladora to earn taxable profit in an amount equal to the greater of: (a) 6.9% of the total value of the assets used in the maquiladora operation (i.e., foreign-owned and Mexican-owned), or (b) 6.5% of the total amount of costs and expenses incurred in the maquiladora operation or 2. An advance pricing agreement (APA) in which the return earned by the maquiladora is determined considering the value of the foreign owned-assets used in the maquiladora operation APAs The APA program is a voluntary process whereby tax authorities and taxpayers resolve transfer pricing issues in a principled and cooperative manner on a prospective basis. By agreeing on the transfer pricing method to be applied during the term of the APA, the taxpayer achieves certainty of tax treatment. In the US, other benefits may include freedom from exposure to penalties under Internal Revenue Code 1 Section 6662(e), freedom from a transfer pricing adjustment by the IRS and, if the APA is bilateral, freedom from double taxation created by different reporting in the US and the other involved country. From a Mexican perspective, the APA is one of the alternatives available to maquiladora companies to comply with transfer pricing requirements and to protect the foreign resident that owns that inventory and assets used in the operation from creating a permanent establishment in Mexico. Since 2014, it is estimated that between 700 and 800 maquiladora companies filed for an APA and the Mexican Tax Authority (SAT 2 ) is expecting to resolve a portion of these APAs under the methodology agreed with the IRS, which is being referred to as a Fast Track methodology. SAT The SAT will be notifying eligible maquiladora taxpayers with pending unilateral APAs about an election to apply the Fast Track methodology agreed in advance with the IRS, which will produce arm s-length results. The detailed and final terms of the methodology agreed between the SAT and IRS has not been publically disclosed, although the SAT shared a draft version in the past weeks. There has also been no official information regarding the terms under which the APAs will be implemented; for example, whether companies will need to amend prior year tax returns or not, if additional tax payments will be subject to surcharges and penalties, or the criteria to determine which companies will be qualify. The IRS, however, has explicitly stated that the transfer pricing results set forth in unilateral APAs executed between SAT and Mexican affiliates of US taxpayers under the framework will be regarded as arm s length under Section 482. This announcement adds to the agreement from 1999 to reflect recent changes in Mexican law regarding transfer pricing and other tax matters. Per the IRS announcement, two years of working with their SAT counterparts has led to this framework, which will hopefully help to resolve a portion of the maquiladora unilateral APA requests currently sitting with the SAT. Implications The SAT will directly notify qualifying Mexican taxpayers about the steps they must take regarding their pending unilateral APA requests. Selected companies must carefully evaluate the implications of the proposed methodology in the context of their current tax position. Taxpayers who decide to decline the election may continue with their APA process under the standard procedure; it is not clear, however, when the SAT will define the methodology or additional information that will be required to resolve maquiladora APAs under the standard procedure. Additionally, maquiladoras may request a bilateral APA with the IRS and SAT (for cases in which the foreign resident contracting with the maquiladora is a resident of the US) or may also consider applying the safe harbor methodology on a going-forward basis (the application on a retroactive basis is not certain subject to compliance with formal requirements). Unfortunately, companies that are not selected under the proposed Fast Track process will need to continue to wait for the SAT to define the methodology and criteria to resolve the pending APAs, which is one of the most important requirements to ensure that the foreign resident contracting with the maquiladora does not create a permanent establishment in Mexico.

3 International Tax Alert News from Transfer Pricing 3 Endnotes 1. All Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 2. In Spanish, Servicio de Administración Tributaria. For additional information with respect to this alert, please contact the following: Ernst & Young LLP, Latin American Business Center, Chicago Michael Becka michael.becka@ey.com Ernst & Young LLP, Latin American Business Center, San Diego Ernesto Ocampo ernesto.ocampo@ey.com Ernst & Young LLP, Transfer Pricing, Washington DC Richard McAlonan richard.mcalonan@ey.com David Canale david.canale@ey.com Carlos Mallo carlos.mallo@ey.com Mancera, S.C., Mexico City Mauricio Fuentes mauricio.fuentes@mx.ey.com Monica Cerda monica.cerda@mx.ey.com Alberto Pena alberto.pena@mx.ey.com Gabriel Lambarri gabriel.lambarri@mx.ey Mancera, S.C., San Pedro Garza García Enrique Gonzalez Cruz enrique.gonzalezcruz@mx.ey.com

4 International Tax Alert News from Transfer Pricing 4 Ernst & Young LLP, International Tax Services US Transfer Pricing Controversy Services David Arnold david.arnold@ey.com David Canale david.canale@ey.com Paul Chmiel paul.chmiel@ey.com Ken Christman kenneth.christmanjr.com David Farhat david.farhat@ey.com Peter Griffin peter.griffin@ey.com Fred Johnson fred.johnson@ey.com Dan Karen dan.karen@ey.com Karen Kirwan karen.kirwan@ey.com Carlos Mallo carlos.mallo@ey.com Dick McAlonan richard.mcalonan@ey.com Loren Ponds loren.ponds@ey.com Craig Sharon craig.sharon@ey.com Miller Williams miller.williams@ey.com Transfer Pricing leaders Ernst & Young LLP, Minneapolis Peter Griffin Ernst & Young LLP (Canada), Ottawa Tom Tsiopoulos Mancera, S.C., Mexico City Enrique Gonzalez Ernst & Young Ltda., Bogota Andres Parra Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, Tel Aviv Lior Harary-Nitzan Ernst & Young LLP, US Area Leaders Larry Eyinla, Atlanta Colleen Warner, Chicago Lonnie Brist, Houston Tracee Fultz, New York Barbara Mace, New York (Financial Services) Anne Welsh, Seattle David Canale, Washington, DC (National Tax) Dick McAlonan, Washington, DC (National Tax)

5 EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. About Ernst & Young s International Tax Services practices Our dedicated international tax professionals assist our clients with their cross-border tax structuring, planning, reporting and risk management. We work with you to build proactive and truly integrated global tax strategies that address the tax risks of today s businesses and achieve sustainable growth. It s how Ernst & Young makes a difference. Transfer Pricing 2016 EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved. EYG no US NY ED None This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice. ey.com