Tackling offshore tax evasion A requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures: CIOT Comments 27 February 2017
|
|
- Kelley Quinn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HMRC consultation document Tackling offshore tax evasion: A requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation is considering the introduction of a new legal requirement that intermediaries creating or promoting certain complex offshore financial arrangements notify HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) of their creation and provide a list of clients using them. Clients in their turn would be expected to notify HMRC of their involvement via a notification number on their self-assessment tax return or personal tax account. Those who fail to comply with these requirements would incur civil sanctions. 1.2 The proposed measure is intended to apply to arrangements which could easily be used for tax evasion purposes. However, as the government recognises, in many cases these arrangements are used for legitimate purposes. Therefore the challenge will be to design a system that gives HMRC the information it wants without placing excessive administrative burdens on professional advisers or duplicating existing reporting obligations. 1.3 We welcome the fact that this consultation is taking place during stage one of the consultation process: Setting out objectives and identifying options. At this stage, HMRC are seeking views on the feasibility and high level design principles, with further consultation planned should the decision be taken to proceed with introducing such a requirement. This is, in our view, the right approach to take when considering the introduction of new legislation. 1.4 As an educational charity, our primary purpose is to promote education in taxation. One of the key aims of the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is to work for a better, more efficient, tax system for all affected by it taxpayers, their advisers and the authorities. Our comments and recommendations on tax issues are made solely in order to achieve this aim; we are a non-party-political organisation.
2 2 Executive summary 2.1 The vast majority of professional tax advisers would never knowingly advise on any structure in relation to tax evasion. Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation 1, the guidance written by seven accountancy and taxation bodies (including CIOT) for their members working in tax is completely clear on this. A member must never be knowingly involved in tax evasion. We accept that it is possible that a structure, onshore or offshore, could be used for evasion by someone determined to break the law, but it is extremely unlikely that they would be doing it with a professional alongside. 2.2 If a new notification system can be designed which successfully provides HMRC with information about offshore tax evasion that they would not otherwise receive and which helps their investigatory work, then this deserves consideration. But since tax evasion or fraud can take place regardless of the form in which a taxpayer s business is, or investments are, organised, the challenge will be to define what it is that HMRC really want and to ensure that the legislation/hallmarks are appropriate, so that both advisers and HMRC do not face an onerous compliance burden and HMRC are not inundated with information they neither need nor want. 2.3 Any new disclosure system should not duplicate existing reporting obligations, such as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS). Additionally, professional firms are already required by Money Laundering Regulations to disclose any cases when there is a reasonable suspicion of a crime, which includes tax evasion. 2.4 We appreciate that applying the obligation to non-uk based operators could be difficult but if it is not extended to them the risk is that those will be the operators who are used by individuals determined to evade tax. 2.5 If the issue of Legal Professional Privilege (LPP), explained in paragraphs 4.27 and 4.28 of the consultation document, cannot be overcome, this presents a fundamental difficulty with these proposals. 2.6 We are also concerned to ensure that the implications of notification under the requirement are not broadened. It would be helpful if HMRC could make an upfront commitment that a notification will not lead to unforeseen consequences for the adviser and their client in the future. Our recent experience with DOTAS is that a measure introduced as a notification exercise has been expanded to become a trigger or hallmark with additional consequence such as the issue of accelerated payment notices (APNs) and certain threshold conditions under the Promoter of Tax Avoidance Scheme regime (POTAS). 2.7 This is a very important point. If there is any possibility that an offshore structure notification could lead to anything connected with, for example POTAS or the Banking Code, taxpayers may have difficulty in obtaining advice from reputable advisers on legitimate offshore arrangements. 1 Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation effective from 1 March P/tech/subsfinal/MOT/2017 2
3 3 Q1: Should the proposal apply only to UK-based persons/businesses who create offshore arrangements, or should offshore persons/businesses also be in scope? 3.1 We see no reason in principle why the proposals should not also apply to offshore persons/businesses, and agree that excluding offshore creators would reduce the impact of the proposal. It is inevitable that anyone determined to engage in tax evasion would simply use a formation agent or adviser outside the UK, where HMRC could not access information until they can get beneficial ownership data under the forthcoming OECD convention. However, if an adviser is based overseas there will be obvious difficulties with enforcement and many overseas organisations will not have processes in place to manage requirements in the UK. 3.2 The work that HMRC have done in designing and enacting the new corporate offence of failure to prevent facilitation of tax evasion which is contained in Part 3 of the Criminal Finances Bill 2017 may be of assistance, since this offence applies to overseas entities as well as UK entities. 4 Q2: How should HMRC define the scope according to which both UK-based and non-uk-based persons/businesses would be liable to report? 4.1 In addressing this question we refer to the policy rationale and objectives set out in Chapter 3 of the consultation document, because the scope of what will need to be reported will be determined by what it is that HMRC are seeking to gain from the information. The policy objectives are principally the obtaining of data in order to: increase transparency around the use of offshore arrangements; improve HMRC s understanding of how offshore arrangements are structured; improve HMRC s risk assessment by helping to identify enablers and users of arrangements used for the purposes of tax evasion; raise awareness and promote voluntary compliance; target HMRC s resources more effectively on non-compliance and tax evasion. 4.2 While increased transparency and the improvement of HMRC s understanding of how offshore arrangements are structured are both worthy aims, we think that there should be a limit to how much information HMRC should compel advisers to provide if it is unclear or questionable whether it assists them directly in their compliance activity. A new notification obligation should not increase administrative burdens on advisers unnecessarily. 4.3 In particular, advisers should not be obliged to provide HMRC with information that they will already be receiving from other sources, such as under international Exchange of Information Agreements or under HMRC s data-gathering powers, such as those in Schedule 23 Finance Act Ideally in our view, the obligation should not apply where the offshore jurisdictions involved are all within the CRS. CRS jurisdictions should be collecting information on P/tech/subsfinal/MOT/2017 3
4 ultimate beneficial ownership (and therefore nominee/ power of attorney type of arrangements) and HMRC should be getting reports on such structures, so the obligation would be burdensome if it applies to CRS countries. 4.5 HMRC s suggestion that options could include identifying the types of arrangements or clients who are in scope then setting out the characteristics that arrangements must demonstrate to be notifiable sounds logical. We would suggest that the scope is limited specifically to the obtaining of information that directly assists HMRC with identifying if arrangements are being used to facilitate tax evasion. 5 Q3: Are there any key circumstances missing from the proposed concept and can you see any opportunities to improve on this basic concept? Q4: Do respondents have any concerns about this approach? Q5: Are there any other approaches we could consider? 5.1 No further comments. 6 Q6: Can you suggest any hallmarks to identify which arrangements would be subject to notification? Q7: Do respondents have any concerns about the use of hallmarks to identify which arrangements would be subject to notification? Q8: Are there any other approaches we could consider? 6.1 No further comments. 7 Q9: Should the requirement be limited to offshore? 7.1 Yes, we think the requirement should be limited to offshore arrangements in the first instance. 8 Q10: Should the requirement be limited to individuals? 8.1 Yes, we think the requirement should be limited to individuals in the first instance. 9 Q11: Are there any further opportunities to change the scope of the measure in order to maximise its effectiveness? 9.1 No comments. 10 Q12: In your view, what impact will issues of Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) have on the effectiveness of the requirement? Q13: How might HMRC address the issue of Legal Professional Privilege? P/tech/subsfinal/MOT/2017 4
5 10.1 If any advice from a lawyer could fall outside these provisions due to LPP being engaged, this is an obvious fundamental flaw in the proposals Our understanding is that LPP may present difficulties. We note that the Law Society has recently taken counsel s advice on whether HMRC s use of its powers under Schedule 23 Finance Act 2011 to seek information about beneficial ownership or interests in offshore trusts and companies from trust and company service providers engages LPP or not 2. Counsel has advised that it does engage LPP, but it appears that this view is not shared by HMRC Modelling the measure on DOTAS where, if privilege is not waived, the arrangements must be disclosed by any person in the UK who enters into any transaction forming part of them presents a fundamental difficulty. DOTAS involves a different compliance mind-set because it concerns tax avoidance, not tax evasion. Passing an obligation to notify HMRC of the details of an offshore arrangement to a taxpayer engaged in non-compliance is clearly pointless. If the taxpayer is using a structure to evade tax, they are not going to tell HMRC about it. 11 Q14: In your view, what impact will this measure have on UK resident but nondomiciled individuals? 11.1 No comments. 12 Q15: How might HMRC address the impact on UK resident but non-domiciled individuals? 12.1 No comments. 13 Q16: Do you agree the measure should apply to existing arrangements and not just new ones? 13.1 We believe the measure should apply only to new arrangements. Applying the measure to existing arrangements will create a disproportionate compliance burden on advisers. 14 Q17: In your view, are there any other considerations that HMRC should take into account when considering the feasibility and design of a requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures? 14.1 The consultation document does not mention the existing notification requirements in s218 IHTA 1984 (non-resident trustees) and schedule 5A TCGA 1992 (settlements with foreign element: information). Can HMRC explain why those provisions might be 2 P/tech/subsfinal/MOT/2017 5
6 insufficient? Could they be adapted in some way eg by applying the requirements to barristers and taking out the non-dom limitation)? 15 Acknowledgement of submission 15.1 We would be grateful if you could acknowledge safe receipt of this submission, and ensure that the Chartered Institute of Taxation is included in the List of Respondents when any outcome of the consultation is published. 16 The Chartered Institute of Taxation 16.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is the leading professional body in the United Kingdom concerned solely with taxation. The CIOT is an educational charity, promoting education and study of the administration and practice of taxation. One of our key aims is to work for a better, more efficient, tax system for all affected by it taxpayers, their advisers and the authorities. The CIOT s work covers all aspects of taxation, including direct and indirect taxes and duties. Through our Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG), the CIOT has a particular focus on improving the tax system, including tax credits and benefits, for the unrepresented taxpayer. The CIOT draws on our members experience in private practice, commerce and industry, government and academia to improve tax administration and propose and explain how tax policy objectives can most effectively be achieved. We also link to, and draw on, similar leading professional tax bodies in other countries. The CIOT s comments and recommendations on tax issues are made in line with our charitable objectives: we are politically neutral in our work. The CIOT s 18,000 members have the practising title of Chartered Tax Adviser and the designatory letters CTA, to represent the leading tax qualification. The Chartered Institute of Taxation 27 February 2017 P/tech/subsfinal/MOT/2017 6
Information will then be exchanged between tax administrations.
OECD Public Discussion Draft Mandatory Disclosure Rules for Addressing CRS Avoidance Arrangements and Offshore Structures Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 In response
More informationHMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is the latest in a series of consultations by
More informationSTEP response to the consultation: Tackling offshore tax evasion: a requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures, published 5 December 2016
STEP response to the consultation: Tackling offshore tax evasion: a requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures, published 5 December 2016 STEP is the global professional association for practitioners
More information1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling offshore tax evasion: a new corporate criminal offence of failure to prevent the facilitation of evasion Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction
More informationNon-resident companies chargeable to Income Tax and non-resident CGT Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Non-resident companies chargeable to Income Tax and non-resident CGT Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT responds to this Stage 1 1 consultation exploring the case
More informationBEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
BEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to respond to the Public discussion draft
More informationPenalties for enablers of defeated tax avoidance HMRC s draft guidance Comments from the Chartered Institute of Taxation
1 Introduction Penalties for enablers of defeated tax avoidance HMRC s draft guidance Comments from the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1.1 We set out below our comments on HMRC s draft guidance on the
More information1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling offshore tax evasion: Civil sanctions for enablers of offshore evasion Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation is inviting
More information1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary
HMRC Consultation Document Strengthening Sanctions for Tax Avoidance a Consultation on Detailed Proposals Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation follows the
More informationFinance Bill Clause 47 and Schedule 8. Enforcement by Deduction from Accounts. Comments by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) Overview
Finance Bill 2015 Clause 47 and Schedule 8 Enforcement by Deduction from Accounts Comments by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) Overview 1. Clause 47 and Schedule 8 introduce a new power to allow
More informationHMRC consultation: Alternative method of VAT collection split payment Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC consultation: Alternative method of VAT collection split payment Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Tax (CIOT) welcomes the opportunity to
More informationStamp Taxes on Share Consideration Rules. Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
30 Monck Street London SW1P 2AP T: +44 (0)20 7340 0550 E:post@ciot.org.uk Stamp Taxes on Share Consideration Rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to the consultation
More information1 Introduction. 1.4 Our stated objectives for the tax system include:
HMRC Technical Consultation: The Value Added Tax (Section 55A) (Specified Services and Excepted Supplies) Order 2019 Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute
More informationOffshore trusts: anti avoidance consultative clause and Schedule (published 13 September 2017) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Offshore trusts: anti avoidance consultative clause and Schedule (published 13 September 2017) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1. Introduction 1.1. The consultative clause and Schedule
More informationAlternative method of VAT collection Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Alternative method of VAT collection Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to set out its comments in relation to the
More informationWritten evidence submitted by Chartered Institute of Taxation (clauses 79 to 80 offshore time limits) (FB02e)
Written evidence submitted by Chartered Institute of Taxation (clauses 79 to 80 offshore time limits) (FB02e) Clauses 79 & 80 Time limits for assessments involving offshore matters: IT, CGT and IHT Executive
More informationWe have no comments on The Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) Regulations.
Tax and VAT affecting Making Tax Digital for businesses Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) 1 Introduction 1.1 The primary legislation introducing Making Tax Digital (MTD) for businesses
More informationCapital Gains Tax: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Capital Gains Tax: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This Stage Two 1 consultation follows the government
More informationNational Insurance and Self-employed Entertainers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
National Insurance and Self-employed Entertainers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to comment on the proposals to
More informationHMRC Consultation Document Income Tax: Extension of averaging period for farmers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document Income Tax: Extension of averaging period for farmers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation discusses the extension of the averaging
More informationVAT and Vouchers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
VAT and Vouchers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is a response from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) to HM Revenue and Customs consultation: VAT and Vouchers.
More informationClarifying the Scope of the Welsh Rates of Income Tax
Clarifying the Scope of the Welsh Rates of Income Tax Consultation on draft legislation- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) Technical Note Joint Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) and Chartered
More informationCorporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Corporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to the government s position paper on Corporate tax and the digital economy published in
More informationTermination payments: CIOT Comments 7 October 2016
Simplification of the tax and National Insurance treatment of termination payments: consultation on draft legislation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute
More informationAligning the tax treatment of Islamic finance and conventional finance Submission by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Aligning the tax treatment of Islamic finance and conventional finance Submission by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 Successive governments have supported and legislated for a level
More informationHMRC Consultation: Large Business compliance enhancing our risk assessment approach Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation: Large Business compliance enhancing our risk assessment approach Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation document is examining how HM Revenue
More information1.5 We note that the purpose of this consultation is to enable the government to gain an understanding of:
Taxation of self-funded work-related training: Consultation on the extension of tax relief for training by employees and the self-employed Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction
More informationTax Treaty Treatment of Termination Payments Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Tax Treaty Treatment of Termination Payments Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation Introduction The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) refer to the public discussion draft published by the
More informationPartnerships: A review of two aspects of the tax rules 2) Profit & Loss Allocation Schemes Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Partnerships: A review of two aspects of the tax rules 2) Profit & Loss Allocation Schemes Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT)
More informationHMRC Consultation Landfill Tax: improving clarity and certainty for taxpayers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Landfill Tax: improving clarity and certainty for taxpayers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) presents its
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore tax evasion: Civil sanctions for enablers of offshore evasion
Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore tax evasion: Civil sanctions for enablers of offshore evasion 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore evasion:
More informationBar Council response to the HMRC consultation on the Draft International Tax Compliance (Client Notification) Regulations 2016
Bar Council response to the HMRC consultation on the Draft International Tax Compliance (Client Notification) Regulations 2016 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales
More informationScottish Landfill Tax A Consultation on Subordinate Legislation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Scottish Landfill Tax A Consultation on Subordinate Legislation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We have previously commented on the Scottish Government s consultation
More informationWe have seen and generally support the comments made by Law Society of England and Wales in its response (the Law Society Response).
City of London Law Society Company Law Committee response to the Department for Business Innovation and Skills Discussion Paper on Transparency & Trust: enhancing the transparency of UK company ownership
More informationHMRC Consultation Document: Company Distributions Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document: Company Distributions Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction outline of the consultation 1.1 This consultation 1 concerns the tax rules governing distributions
More informationTAXING GAINS MADE BY NON-RESIDENTS ON UK IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
TAXING GAINS MADE BY NON-RESIDENTS ON UK IMMOVABLE PROPERTY Response by the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 The Association of Taxation Technicians (ATT) is pleased to have the opportunity
More informationSTEP response to HMRC s consultation on Tax Avoidance Involving Profit Fragmentation.
STEP response to HMRC s consultation on Tax Avoidance Involving Profit Fragmentation. About us STEP is the worldwide professional association for those advising families across generations. We help people
More informationVAT registration threshold: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
VAT registration threshold: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Tax (CIOT) welcomes the opportunity to respond to HM Treasury
More informationEmployee Benefits and Expenses exemption for paid or reimbursed expenses. Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Employee Benefits and Expenses exemption for paid or reimbursed expenses Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) sets outs
More informationConsultation: Taxing gains made by non-residents on UK immovable property Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Consultation: Taxing gains made by non-residents on UK immovable property Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT responds to the consultation Taxing gains made by non-residents
More informationFinance Bill 2016, clause 82 Inheritance Tax: Increased Nil Rate Band (Downsizing)
Ref: ST 8 June 2016 Via email only: danka.wigley@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk Dear Danka Finance Bill 2016, clause 82 Inheritance Tax: Increased Nil Rate Band (Downsizing) Policy Objective Paragraph 1.53 of the 16
More informationSimplifying the PAYE Settlement Agreement (PSA) process Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Simplifying the PAYE Settlement Agreement (PSA) process Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) sets out below its response to the
More informationFurther written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (Clauses 50-52) (FB02d)
Further written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (Clauses 50-52) (FB02d) VAT Clauses 50-52 Executive Summary Clause 50 is designed to give the government the flexibility to amend
More informationEmployee Benefits and Expenses Real time collection of tax on benefits in kind and expenses through Voluntary Payrolling
Employee Benefits and Expenses Real time collection of tax on benefits in kind and expenses through Voluntary Payrolling Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 The
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore evasion: A new criminal offence for offshore evaders
Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore evasion: A new criminal offence for offshore evaders 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore evasion: A
More informationStakeholder Consultation: Review of Double Taxation Treaties 2018
Ref: IT 30 November 2018 David Price Tax Treaty Team BAI International Relations and Capacity Building Zone C, Floor 9 10 South Colonnade Canary Wharf E14 4PU Via email: taxtreaty.team@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk
More informationWritten evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (FB13)
Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (FB13) Employment Income, etc (clauses 7-17 and related schedules) Executive Summary Clause 9: Benefits in kind: diesel cars We believe
More informationTax Enquiries: Closure Rules Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Tax Enquiries: Closure Rules Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We agree that the current closure rules on tax enquiries need to be revisited and updated as
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to Law Commission Consultation on Anti-Money Laundering: the SARs regime
Association of Accounting Technicians response to Law Commission Consultation on Anti-Money Laundering: the SARs regime 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to Law Commission Consultation on
More information1 Introduction. Background
Revenue Scotland Scottish Landfill Tax guidance on how to determine the rate of tax chargeable on waste fines A Consultation Paper Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This
More informationOur ref COMM LIT/OPEN/-1/TIHA OH ZO'I5 Your ref
Simmons &Simmons Simmons &Simmons LLP CityPoint One Ropemaker Street London EC2Y 9SS United Kingdom T +44 20 7628 2020 F +44 20 7628 2070 DX Box No 12 Our ref COMM LIT/OPEN/-1/TIHA OH OCtOb@f ZO'I5 Your
More informationSTEP welcomes the opportunity to respond to the consulation paper published on 20 April 2016.
Response of STEP to Strengthening the tax avoidance disclosure regime for indirect taxes and inheritance tax consulation paper published on 20 April 2016 STEP is the worldwide professional association
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to HM Revenue and Customs consultation Tackling tax evasion: legislation and guidance for a corporate
o Association of Accounting Technicians response to HM Revenue and Customs consultation Tackling tax evasion: legislation and guidance for a corporate offence of failure to prevent the criminal facilitation
More informationAAT RESPONSE TO HMRC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON TACKLING OFFSHORE TAX EVASION: STRENGTHENING CIVIL DETERRENTS (RELEASED 19 AUGUST 2014)
AAT RESPONSE TO HMRC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON TACKLING OFFSHORE TAX EVASION: STRENGTHENING CIVIL DETERRENTS (RELEASED 19 AUGUST 2014) 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT)
More informationEuropean and External Relations Committee. The EU referendum and its implications for Scotland
European and External Relations Committee The EU referendum and its implications for Scotland Written submission from the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is a response by the Chartered
More informationRent a room relief: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Rent a room relief: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Government
More information1 Executive Summary UK REPRESENTATIVE BODY ON THE CONFEDERATION FISCALE EUROPEENNE
Deduction of income tax from savings income: implementation of the Personal Savings Allowance HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1
More informationTackling offshore tax evasion: A Requirement to Correct
Tackling offshore tax evasion: A Requirement to Correct A consultation document issued by HM Revenue & Customs Comments from October 2016 (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is the global
More information1 Introduction (1776). Parliament, 7 June 2012:
Call for Evidence: A Scottish Approach to Taxation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation, the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group and the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 This
More informationInheritance Tax: A fairer way of calculating trust charges Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Inheritance Tax: A fairer way of calculating trust charges Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) sets out below its comments on HMRC
More informationRoyalties Withholding Tax Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Royalties Withholding Tax Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to consultation document on Royalties Withholding Tax published on 1 December 2017. We welcome the
More informationCombatting Tax Avoidance. John Barnett CTA (Fellow) TEP Partner, Burges Salmon LLP
Combatting Tax Avoidance John Barnett CTA (Fellow) TEP Partner, Burges Salmon LLP The War on Tax Avoidance Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) update Accelerated Payment Notices Information Powers
More informationMaking Tax Digital: interest harmonisation and sanctions for late payment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Making Tax Digital: interest harmonisation and sanctions for late payment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We welcome the fact that the proposed model for
More informationFRAUD ADVISORY PANEL REPRESENTATION 02/17
FRAUD ADVISORY PANEL REPRESENTATION 02/17 RESPONSE TO CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR ECONOMIC CRIME CALL FOR EVIDENCE PUBLISHED 13 JANUARY 2017 The Fraud Advisory Panel welcomes the opportunity to comment on
More informationANTI-FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION POLICY
Issue 1 Page 1 ANTI-FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION POLICY This policy is endorsed by Harworth s Board of Directors and will be reviewed regularly. This policy may be changed from time to time and you will
More informationCustoms Bill: legislating for the UK s future customs, VAT and excise regimes Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Customs Bill: legislating for the UK s future customs, VAT and excise regimes Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to HM Treasury s White Paper Customs Bill: legislating
More informationJersey Disclosure Facility: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Jersey Disclosure Facility: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) FAQs The following is intended to provide answers to commonly asked questions about the Jersey Disclosure Facility (JDF). The answers given
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling the hidden economy Extension of datagathering
Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling the hidden economy Extension of datagathering powers 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling the hidden economy Extension
More informationEuropean Commission s Working Document on Implementing Measures under the Third Money Laundering Directive Response of the Law Society
European Commission s Working Document on Implementing Measures under the Third Money Laundering Directive Response of the Law Society 1 European Commission's Working Document on Implementing Measures
More informationSavings allowance, and savings nil rate etc.; deduction of Income Tax at source Consultation on draft clauses for Finance Bill 2016 Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary
More informationStrengthening Tax Avoidance Sanctions and Deterrents HMRC discussion document Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Strengthening Tax Avoidance Sanctions and Deterrents HMRC discussion document Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1. Introduction 1.1. This consultation considers the following: 1. Proposals
More informationLand Transaction Tax and Anti-avoidance of Devolved Taxes (Wales) Bill Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Land Transaction Tax and Anti-avoidance of Devolved Taxes (Wales) Bill Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Finance Committee
More informationMoney Laundering Regulations 2017
Money Laundering Regulations 2017 A public consultation issued by HM Treasury Comments from April 2017 Ref: TECH-CDR-1535 (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is the global body for professional
More informationTransparency & trust: enhancing the transparency of UK company ownership and increasing trust in UK business. Discussion Paper, July 2013
Transparency & trust: enhancing the transparency of UK company ownership and increasing trust in UK business Discussion Paper, July 2013 The Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) is the worldwide
More informationTackling offshore tax evasion: Strengthening civil deterrents for offshore evaders
Tackling offshore tax evasion: Strengthening civil deterrents for offshore evaders Consultation document Publication date: 16 July 2015 Closing date for comments: 8 October 2015 Scope of this consultation:
More informationCorporate Criminal Offence: What Next?
Corporate Criminal Offence: What Next? Implementing reasonable prevention procedures September 2017 Renewed focus on transparency, evasion and controls Globally, tax evasion is coming under increasing
More informationThis article aims to provide guidance on whether you are affected by these measures, and practical tips on how to comply if you are.
Action required 1 December 2016 Richard Wild explains why advisers may have to send HMRC-branded correspondence to their clients, and how this might be achieved What is the issue? Regulations have recently
More informationFailure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion: Our solution to help you avoid committing the new offence
Failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion: Our solution to help you avoid committing the new offence November 2016 Tax evasion can take many forms, and distinguishing tax evasion from tax avoidance
More information... A guide to the suitability of offshore bonds for UK professional advisers. Summary of the Budget Measures
2008 Post-Budget Update A guide to the suitability of offshore bonds for UK professional advisers The 2008 Finance Bill was published in late March, providing more detail on the proposals announced by
More informationCapital allowances for structures and buildings. Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
30 Monck Street London SW1P 2AP T: +44 (0)20 7340 0550 E:post@ciot.org.uk Capital allowances for structures and buildings Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to
More informationBackground. Questions. Principle
Response to Department for Business Innovations & Skills Beneficial Ownership Transparency discussion paper from National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA) April 2016 Background 1. National Association
More informationAutumn Budget 2017: The Budget, in full
www.ukbudget.com 22 November 2017 Autumn Budget 2017: The Budget, in full Contents Introduction 1 Tackling tax avoidance, evasion and non-compliance 2 Real estate 2.1 UK real estate 2.2 CGT payment deadline
More informationFailure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion:
Failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion: Our solution to help you avoid committing the new offence October 2016 This note does not constitute legal advice. Specific legal advice should be taken
More informationB/Chartered Institute of Taxation submission of 01 August 2017 The Impact of Brexit on the Scottish Budget
B/Chartered Institute of Taxation submission of 01 August 2017 The Impact of Brexit on the Scottish Budget This is a response from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) to the Finance and Constitution
More informationThe Commission on Local Tax Reform What s the Future of Local Taxation in Scotland? Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
The Commission on Local Tax Reform What s the Future of Local Taxation in Scotland? Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased
More informationTRUSTEES AND THE NEW ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING REGIME
TRUSTEES AND THE NEW ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING REGIME 1 INTRODUCTION Changes made to the UK anti-money laundering regime from 15 December 2007 1 require trustees or directors of a corporate trustee who are
More informationInstitute of Actuaries DPB Compliance Bulletin No. 23 October 2011 Anti Money Laundering
Status: Advisory Institute of Actuaries DPB Compliance Bulletin No. 23 October 2011 Anti Money Laundering Does the law on Money Laundering apply to DPB firms? Yes. It applies to a range of specified firms
More informationBLICK ROTHENBERG UK reporting obligations and UK Taxation of offshore structures
BLICK ROTHENBERG UK reporting obligations and UK Taxation of offshore structures 1. Introduction 2. Headline changes to UK tax 3. IHT Trip Wires for Trustees 4. Touch points for UK reporting 5. UK register
More informationHMRC Tax-Free Childcare: Draft Guidance for comment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
HMRC Tax-Free Childcare: Draft Guidance for comment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 General comments 1.1 We welcome this opportunity to comment on the Tax-Free Childcare (TFC)
More informationTransforming bailiff action, Ministry of Justice consultation paper CP5/2012
Transforming bailiff action, Ministry of Justice consultation paper CP5/2012 Response by the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group, incorporating comments from the Chartered Institute of Taxation and TaxAid 1.
More informationThe smoking gun that recruitment agencies and freelance contractors can t afford to ignore
The smoking gun that recruitment agencies and freelance contractors can t afford to ignore Time is running out for recruiters and contractors to get their books in order in time for the Criminal Finances
More informationHM REVENUE & CUSTOMS. Consultation Document: A new incentive for charitable legacies. Publication date: 10 June 2011
HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS Consultation Document: A new incentive for charitable legacies Publication date: 10 June 2011 1 STEP 1.1 The Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) is the worldwide professional
More informationTREASURY SELECT COMMITTEE ENQUIRY ON ECONOMIC CRIME
L ICAEW REPRESENTATION 48/18 TREASURY SELECT COMMITTEE ENQUIRY ON ECONOMIC CRIME ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Treasury Select Committee enquiry on economic crime published by Treasury
More informationReview of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007: The Government Response
Response to the HM Treasury consultation paper Review of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007: The Government Response September 2011 Fraud Advisory Panel Registered office: Chartered Accountants Hall,
More informationDepartment for Education Northern Ireland
Department for Education Northern Ireland Consultation on changes to eligibility criteria for free school meals and uniform grants Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary
More informationCorporate interest restriction (clause 20 and schedule 5)
Corporate interest restriction (clause 20 and schedule 5) Briefing Note from the Chartered Institute of Taxation for Finance Bill 2017-19 Summary Notwithstanding that the delay as a result of the general
More informationJOSEPH GALLAGHER LTD CRIMINAL FINANCES ACT (ANTI-TAX EVASION) POLICY. Introduction
JOSEPH GALLAGHER LTD CRIMINAL FINANCES ACT (ANTI-TAX EVASION) POLICY Introduction 1.1 In the light of Criminal Finances Act 2017, the Company has adopted a Tackling Tax Evasion Statement ( the statement
More informationFailure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion. Jason Collins & Tori Magill
Failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion Jason Collins & Tori Magill Agenda FTP Overview and rationale The three ingredients of the FTP offence Associated persons Reasonable procedures De-risking,
More informationBehavioural challenge
Behavioural challenge 1 January 2018 Helen Adams considers the findings of research commissioned by HMRC into tax evasion and the sharing economy and what more could be done to improve compliance What
More informationAAT RESPONSE TO HMRC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON STRENGTHENING THE TAX AVOIDANCE DISCLOSURE REGIMES
AAT RESPONSE TO HMRC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON STRENGTHENING THE TAX AVOIDANCE DISCLOSURE REGIMES 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT) is pleased to respond to the HMRC
More information