National Insurance and Self-employed Entertainers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
|
|
- Aileen Cooper
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 National Insurance and Self-employed Entertainers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to comment on the proposals to simplify the Social Security (Categorisation of Earners) Regulations 1978 (the Regulations ) for self-employed entertainers. 2 Executive summary 2.1 We agree that HMRC s preferred option, to repeal the Regulation in respect of selfemployed entertainers, is the appropriate way forward. Class 1 NIC contributions are essentially intended to apply only for employees; deeming the self-employed to be employed in our view represents a distortion and creates complexity. Taking on board the arguments presented in the consultative document, we conclude that such distortion and complexity is not justified, in principle, as regards self-employed entertainers and, accordingly, that Class 2 and Class 4 NICs should apply to them as they apply to the self-employed generally. 2.2 The consultative document points out that there may be a (relatively modest) cost implication in repealing this Regulation as Class 1 NIC brings in more revenue to HMRC than a combination of Classes 2 and 4. However, we believe that if an individual is properly self-employed then they should nevertheless be subject to income tax and NIC on that basis so that, in the case of self-employed entertainers, the integrity of the NIC system is restored. 2.3 HMRC has analysed the position on entitlement to benefits and concluded that for self-employed entertainers with high amounts of savings or partners who may be working may receive less in terms of benefits when out of work when subject to Class 2 and 4 NIC than when subject to Class 1 NIC. But HMRC also conclude that for those most in need of support, means-tested Universal Credit should provide at least the same level of support as does JSA. Providing this is correct, the most vulnerable would appear to be protected and, accordingly, we consider that the proposed changes should not be detrimental to them. For those with greater means the level of benefit entitlement may fall, but they would be in no different a position as the selfemployed population as a whole. 2.4 The reduction in statutory entitlements for pregnant female entertainers that is
2 discussed in the Taxes Impact Assessment should be researched further and addressed before the Regulations are repealed. 2.5 We think that HMRC should review the Regulations as a whole to determine whether other categories of self-employed workers should also no longer be deemed to be employed earners for NIC purposes. 3 National Insurance and Self-employed Entertainers 3.1 Deeming an individual to be employed or self-employed for NIC purposes simply creates complexity and confusion. In regard to entertainers this is acknowledged and commented on in detail in Part 3 ( The Issues ) of the consultation document. 3.2 The Regulations have failed to provide a balance between those entertainers who need an entitlement to contributory benefits and respecting the self-employed status of those who do not. 3.3 Consequently, we agree that it is time to review the operation of the Regulations and amend the legislation so as to address the problems that the Regulations are causing. 3.4 Chapter 6 of the consultation document identifies a number of issues and concerns to be addressed and proposes three possible approaches. These are: Do nothing - entertainers retain dual status for Tax and NICs; Simplifying the legislation but maintaining the Class 1 NICs regime; or Moving entertainers earnings into the Class 2 and 4 NICs regimes. Whatever option is chosen it will be difficult to address all of the issues and concerns identified, and some compromises will inevitably need to be made. 3.5 Do nothing entertainers retain dual status for Tax and NICs Question 1: Do you agree that current NICs treatment of entertainers under the Social Security (Categorisation of Earners) Regulations 1978 needs to be changed? We agree that the current NICs rules need changing. Doing nothing is simply not an option (as paragraph 6.3 acknowledges). The Regulations no longer work; the nature of the industry has changed and the Regulations are simply imposing an inappropriate financial and administrative burden on the industry (and HMRC in policing it). 3.6 The difficulties in collecting and enforcing payment of Class 1 NIC, where paid by multiple parties over many years, is commented on in the consultation document and should not be underestimated. It is worth noting that in , when the Regulations on entertainers first came into effect, the secondary Class 1 NIC rate was potentially as low as 3% (compared with 13.8% now). 3.7 Simplifying the legislation but maintaining the Class 1 NICs regime Two options for simplifying the legislation are suggested in Chapter 7. These are: Option 1: Provide for separate secondary contributors for NICs due on Initial Performance Payments (IPPs) and NICs due on Additional Use Payments (AUPs); or Option 2: Provide that IPPs are subject to Class 1 NICs, but AUPs are subject P/tech/subsfinal/ET/2013 2
3 3.8 Option 1 to Class 4 NICs. Option 1 is impractical, for the reasons given in paragraphs of the consultation document; given the preponderance of non-uk payers of AUPs we believe this would impose a significant regulatory burden on the entertainers (for example, the entertainer will have to register as an NIC-only employer and, we assume, will then be required to report payments they have received under Real Time Information). It also alleviates none of the complexity of determining what payments fall within the Regulations. 3.9 Option 2 Option 2 is simpler and benefit protection (paragraph 7.29) may not be a major issue given that AUPs are likely to be relatively smaller than IPPs (and potentially below the lower earnings limit). However, it does not address concerns around when the Regulations are engaged, for example, whether IPPs are paid by reference to time (see paragraphs of the consultative document) and the underlying point that self-employed entertainers are, indeed, self-employed not employed, and so should be treated accordingly for NIC purposes Consequently, we agree with the conclusion at paragraph 7.33 of the consultation document that neither of these Options should be adopted Question 2: Do you agree that self-employed entertainers should be removed from the Class 1 NICs regime? Please give reasons for your answer We agree for the reasons noted at paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 3.5, 3.6 and above that self-employed entertainers should not continue to be deemed to be employed for NIC purposes Moving entertainers earnings into the Class 2 and 4 NICs regimes Chapter 8 suggests two options to move self-employed entertainers fully into NIC Classes 2 and 4: Option 3: Repealing the Regulations in respect of entertainers, and amending Social Security legislation to introduce a new higher rate special Class 2 NICs, for entertainers only, to be paid in addition to Class 4 NICs. The higher rate would be in return for access to contribution-based JSA; or Option 4: Repealing the Regulations in respect of entertainers in order that entertainers pay Class 2 and Class 4 NICs like other self-employed individuals. This is HMRC s preferred option as explained in Chapter 9 of this document Question 3: Do you agree that self-employed entertainers should be placed in the Class 2 and 4 NICs regime? We agree that self-employed entertainers should pay Class 2 and Class 4 NICs. This recognises the true nature of the arrangement between the self-employed entertainer and producer Question 4: If you answered Yes to Question 3, which of the two possible P/tech/subsfinal/ET/2013 3
4 options discussed in this chapter do you believe should be adopted? Both options alleviate the administrative and financial burdens on the industry but our preferred option is Option Option 3 While there may be a justification for a higher level of Class 2 contributions to gain access to contributory JSA, we think it is difficult to justify treating one group of selfemployed individuals differently to another group. While exceptions have been made in the past, eg for share fisherman and voluntary development workers, we do not see that the case for a special type of Class 2 contributions for entertainers has been made. If this were introduced we can envisage other sectors might also start to argue for higher Class 2 contributions in return for JSA entitlement Option 3 would also impose a financial and administrative burden on the entertainers (and Government; eg reduced revenue without a reduction in JSA obligations). In addition, it will not simply be a case of imposing a higher rate of Class 2; decisions will need to be made as to what payments are received as an entertainer and which are received in some other self-employed capacity Consequently, we do not think Option 3 should be progressed Question 5: Having considered Chapter 9, do you agree that Option 4 should be implemented as the future NICs treatment of entertainers? We agree with HMRC that Option 4 (repeal) represents the appropriate way forward. It would alleviate the current financial and regulatory burdens faced by the industry. It also provides the desired simplicity and transparency, and maintains the integrity of the NICs system While access to JSA and other contributory benefits would be lost, HMRC point out that entertainers will be able to access the new Universal Credit, just like any other self-employed individual. Whilst the benefit entitlement under the Universal Credit would be means-tested, this would appear to address the concerns here in terms of those most in need of support (paragraph 9.7 of the consultative document refers). In addition the immediate financial cost to the entertainer may be reduced, as, for those on lower earnings, the Class 2 and Class 4 NICs liability is likely to be less than Class 1 NIC deductions The Taxes Impact Assessment (TIA) notes that repeal will adversely affect pregnant female entertainers as entitlement to Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP) would cease and be replaced with the much lower Statutory Maternity Allowance (SMA). This point is important and there needs to be more research carried out to ascertain the size of the problem and to come to an appropriate solution before the Regulations are repealed Question 6: Do you have any other comments you would like to make about the information contained in this consultation document, or information which you believe is relevant to this consultation? We acknowledge that repeal would potentially expose resting actors to the wider financial risks of being self-employed. We also note from paragraph 4.5 of the consultative document that actors feel that they need the protection of Class 1 for JSA entitlement purposes (but do not think that Class 1 should be paid on AUPs). At the P/tech/subsfinal/ET/2013 4
5 same time HMRC discuss the position under JSA as compared to means-tested Universal Credit and we have referred to this above. However, a further way to address JSA entitlement concerns would be for industry stakeholders to work together and review standard contracts to see whether a standardised contract of service can be agreed. This would give entertainers the choice of paying Class 1 contributions etc rather than being exposed to the wider risks of being self-employed Question 7: Do you agree with our assessment of the Taxes impacts of Option 4? If not, please provide evidence for this. The Exchequer impact does appear not to take account of the current cost to the Exchequer of providing JSA contributory-based benefits to entertainers and the potential saving that would arise were this not so and payment was instead under the new system of means-tested Universal Credit. Another factor to consider is that less regulatory burden and lower cost, coupled with other initiatives to encourage the creative sector, may entice foreign producers to the UK; thus increasing Exchequer revenues. 4 General comment on the Social Security (Categorisation of Earners) Regulations The Social Security (Categorisation of Earners) Regulations 1978 override normal case law principles as to whether an individual is employed or self-employed and treat self-employed individuals as employed for NIC purposes. 4.2 There have been changes to both the way in which individuals work and the socialeconomic climate since the Regulations were enacted. We would suggest a review of all the categories to consider whether the need for special NIC categorisation rules still exists. 5 The Chartered Institute of Taxation 5.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is the leading professional body in the United Kingdom concerned solely with taxation. The CIOT is an educational charity, promoting education and study of the administration and practice of taxation. One of our key aims is to work for a better, more efficient, tax system for all affected by it taxpayers, their advisers and the authorities. The CIOT s work covers all aspects of taxation, including direct and indirect taxes and duties. Through our Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG), the CIOT has a particular focus on improving the tax system, including tax credits and benefits, for the unrepresented taxpayer. The CIOT draws on our members experience in private practice, commerce and industry, government and academia to improve tax administration and propose and explain how tax policy objectives can most effectively be achieved. We also link to, and draw on, similar leading professional tax bodies in other countries. The CIOT s comments and recommendations on tax issues are made in line with our charitable objectives: we are politically neutral in our work. The CIOT s 16,800 members have the practising title of Chartered Tax Adviser and the designatory letters CTA, to represent the leading tax qualification. The Chartered Institute of Taxation 23 July 2013 P/tech/subsfinal/ET/2013 5
Termination payments: CIOT Comments 7 October 2016
Simplification of the tax and National Insurance treatment of termination payments: consultation on draft legislation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute
More informationNon-resident companies chargeable to Income Tax and non-resident CGT Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Non-resident companies chargeable to Income Tax and non-resident CGT Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT responds to this Stage 1 1 consultation exploring the case
More informationEmployee Benefits and Expenses exemption for paid or reimbursed expenses. Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Employee Benefits and Expenses exemption for paid or reimbursed expenses Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) sets outs
More informationHMRC Consultation Document Income Tax: Extension of averaging period for farmers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document Income Tax: Extension of averaging period for farmers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation discusses the extension of the averaging
More informationEmployee Benefits and Expenses Real time collection of tax on benefits in kind and expenses through Voluntary Payrolling
Employee Benefits and Expenses Real time collection of tax on benefits in kind and expenses through Voluntary Payrolling Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 The
More informationFinance Bill Clause 47 and Schedule 8. Enforcement by Deduction from Accounts. Comments by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) Overview
Finance Bill 2015 Clause 47 and Schedule 8 Enforcement by Deduction from Accounts Comments by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) Overview 1. Clause 47 and Schedule 8 introduce a new power to allow
More informationHMRC Consultation: Large Business compliance enhancing our risk assessment approach Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation: Large Business compliance enhancing our risk assessment approach Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation document is examining how HM Revenue
More informationHMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is the latest in a series of consultations by
More informationBEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
BEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to respond to the Public discussion draft
More informationHMRC consultation: Alternative method of VAT collection split payment Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC consultation: Alternative method of VAT collection split payment Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Tax (CIOT) welcomes the opportunity to
More informationHMRC Consultation Landfill Tax: improving clarity and certainty for taxpayers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Landfill Tax: improving clarity and certainty for taxpayers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) presents its
More informationAlternative method of VAT collection Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Alternative method of VAT collection Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to set out its comments in relation to the
More informationTax Treaty Treatment of Termination Payments Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Tax Treaty Treatment of Termination Payments Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation Introduction The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) refer to the public discussion draft published by the
More information1 Introduction. 1.4 Our stated objectives for the tax system include:
HMRC Technical Consultation: The Value Added Tax (Section 55A) (Specified Services and Excepted Supplies) Order 2019 Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute
More information1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling offshore tax evasion: a new corporate criminal offence of failure to prevent the facilitation of evasion Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction
More informationCorporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Corporate tax and the digital economy Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to the government s position paper on Corporate tax and the digital economy published in
More informationTackling offshore tax evasion A requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures: CIOT Comments 27 February 2017
HMRC consultation document Tackling offshore tax evasion: A requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation is considering
More informationFinance Bill 2016, clause 82 Inheritance Tax: Increased Nil Rate Band (Downsizing)
Ref: ST 8 June 2016 Via email only: danka.wigley@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk Dear Danka Finance Bill 2016, clause 82 Inheritance Tax: Increased Nil Rate Band (Downsizing) Policy Objective Paragraph 1.53 of the 16
More informationCapital Gains Tax: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Capital Gains Tax: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This Stage Two 1 consultation follows the government
More information1 Introduction. Background
Revenue Scotland Scottish Landfill Tax guidance on how to determine the rate of tax chargeable on waste fines A Consultation Paper Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This
More informationPartnerships: A review of two aspects of the tax rules 2) Profit & Loss Allocation Schemes Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Partnerships: A review of two aspects of the tax rules 2) Profit & Loss Allocation Schemes Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT)
More informationSimplifying the PAYE Settlement Agreement (PSA) process Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Simplifying the PAYE Settlement Agreement (PSA) process Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) sets out below its response to the
More informationAligning the tax treatment of Islamic finance and conventional finance Submission by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Aligning the tax treatment of Islamic finance and conventional finance Submission by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 Successive governments have supported and legislated for a level
More informationVAT and Vouchers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
VAT and Vouchers Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is a response from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) to HM Revenue and Customs consultation: VAT and Vouchers.
More informationInheritance Tax: A fairer way of calculating trust charges Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Inheritance Tax: A fairer way of calculating trust charges Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) sets out below its comments on HMRC
More informationPenalties for enablers of defeated tax avoidance HMRC s draft guidance Comments from the Chartered Institute of Taxation
1 Introduction Penalties for enablers of defeated tax avoidance HMRC s draft guidance Comments from the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1.1 We set out below our comments on HMRC s draft guidance on the
More informationWe have no comments on The Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) Regulations.
Tax and VAT affecting Making Tax Digital for businesses Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) 1 Introduction 1.1 The primary legislation introducing Making Tax Digital (MTD) for businesses
More informationOffshore trusts: anti avoidance consultative clause and Schedule (published 13 September 2017) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Offshore trusts: anti avoidance consultative clause and Schedule (published 13 September 2017) Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1. Introduction 1.1. The consultative clause and Schedule
More informationWritten evidence submitted by Chartered Institute of Taxation (clauses 79 to 80 offshore time limits) (FB02e)
Written evidence submitted by Chartered Institute of Taxation (clauses 79 to 80 offshore time limits) (FB02e) Clauses 79 & 80 Time limits for assessments involving offshore matters: IT, CGT and IHT Executive
More informationScottish Landfill Tax A Consultation on Subordinate Legislation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Scottish Landfill Tax A Consultation on Subordinate Legislation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We have previously commented on the Scottish Government s consultation
More information1.5 We note that the purpose of this consultation is to enable the government to gain an understanding of:
Taxation of self-funded work-related training: Consultation on the extension of tax relief for training by employees and the self-employed Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction
More informationStamp Taxes on Share Consideration Rules. Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
30 Monck Street London SW1P 2AP T: +44 (0)20 7340 0550 E:post@ciot.org.uk Stamp Taxes on Share Consideration Rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to the consultation
More informationClarifying the Scope of the Welsh Rates of Income Tax
Clarifying the Scope of the Welsh Rates of Income Tax Consultation on draft legislation- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) Technical Note Joint Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) and Chartered
More informationStakeholder Consultation: Review of Double Taxation Treaties 2018
Ref: IT 30 November 2018 David Price Tax Treaty Team BAI International Relations and Capacity Building Zone C, Floor 9 10 South Colonnade Canary Wharf E14 4PU Via email: taxtreaty.team@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk
More informationVAT registration threshold: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
VAT registration threshold: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Tax (CIOT) welcomes the opportunity to respond to HM Treasury
More informationNATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS: IMPROVING COLLECTION FROM THE SELF EMPLOYED
NATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS: IMPROVING COLLECTION FROM THE SELF EMPLOYED Memorandum submitted in June 2008 by the Tax Faculty of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in response
More informationEuropean and External Relations Committee. The EU referendum and its implications for Scotland
European and External Relations Committee The EU referendum and its implications for Scotland Written submission from the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is a response by the Chartered
More informationThe Commission on Local Tax Reform What s the Future of Local Taxation in Scotland? Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
The Commission on Local Tax Reform What s the Future of Local Taxation in Scotland? Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased
More information1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling offshore tax evasion: Civil sanctions for enablers of offshore evasion Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation is inviting
More informationDepartment for Education Northern Ireland
Department for Education Northern Ireland Consultation on changes to eligibility criteria for free school meals and uniform grants Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary
More informationInformation will then be exchanged between tax administrations.
OECD Public Discussion Draft Mandatory Disclosure Rules for Addressing CRS Avoidance Arrangements and Offshore Structures Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 In response
More informationFINANCE BILL 2015 DRAFT CLAUSES EXEMPTION FROM INCOME TAX FOR TRIVIAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY EMPLOYERS
FINANCE BILL 2015 DRAFT CLAUSES EXEMPTION FROM INCOME TAX FOR TRIVIAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY EMPLOYERS Response by the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 The Association of Taxation Technicians
More information1 Introduction (1776). Parliament, 7 June 2012:
Call for Evidence: A Scottish Approach to Taxation Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation, the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group and the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 This
More informationCapital allowances for structures and buildings. Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
30 Monck Street London SW1P 2AP T: +44 (0)20 7340 0550 E:post@ciot.org.uk Capital allowances for structures and buildings Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to
More informationRent a room relief: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Rent a room relief: call for evidence Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Government
More informationFurther written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (Clauses 50-52) (FB02d)
Further written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (Clauses 50-52) (FB02d) VAT Clauses 50-52 Executive Summary Clause 50 is designed to give the government the flexibility to amend
More information1 Executive Summary. s. 65 ITEPA UK REPRESENTATIVE BODY ON THE CONFEDERATION FISCALE EUROPEENNE
Employee Benefits and Expenses exemption for paid or reimbursed expenses HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1
More information1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary
HMRC Consultation Document Strengthening Sanctions for Tax Avoidance a Consultation on Detailed Proposals Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This consultation follows the
More informationTAXREP 35/15 (ICAEW REPRESENTATION 97/15)
TAXREP 35/15 (ICAEW REPRESENTATION 97/15) RENEWALS BASIS FOR UNFURNISHED RENTAL PROPERTY- ASSESSING THE IMPACT This representation of 30 June 2015 has been prepared on behalf of ICAEW by the Tax Faculty
More informationB/Chartered Institute of Taxation submission of 01 August 2017 The Impact of Brexit on the Scottish Budget
B/Chartered Institute of Taxation submission of 01 August 2017 The Impact of Brexit on the Scottish Budget This is a response from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) to the Finance and Constitution
More informationSavings allowance, and savings nil rate etc.; deduction of Income Tax at source Consultation on draft clauses for Finance Bill 2016 Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary
More informationHMRC Consultation Document: Company Distributions Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document: Company Distributions Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction outline of the consultation 1.1 This consultation 1 concerns the tax rules governing distributions
More informationConsultation: Taxing gains made by non-residents on UK immovable property Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Consultation: Taxing gains made by non-residents on UK immovable property Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT responds to the consultation Taxing gains made by non-residents
More information1 Executive Summary UK REPRESENTATIVE BODY ON THE CONFEDERATION FISCALE EUROPEENNE
Deduction of income tax from savings income: implementation of the Personal Savings Allowance HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1
More informationLand Transaction Tax and Anti-avoidance of Devolved Taxes (Wales) Bill Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Land Transaction Tax and Anti-avoidance of Devolved Taxes (Wales) Bill Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The CIOT welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Finance Committee
More information1 Executive Summary. CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF TAXATION 1st Floor, Artillery House, Artillery Row, London, SW1P 1RT
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Employment Intermediaries and Tax Relief for Travel and Subsistence Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) Executive Summary. We welcome
More informationWritten evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (FB13)
Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (FB13) Employment Income, etc (clauses 7-17 and related schedules) Executive Summary Clause 9: Benefits in kind: diesel cars We believe
More informationTax Enquiries: Closure Rules Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Tax Enquiries: Closure Rules Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We agree that the current closure rules on tax enquiries need to be revisited and updated as
More informationFINAL.pdf
Self-employed earners, etc: restructuring of contributions Consultation on draft clauses for Finance Bill 2017 Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We welcome
More informationPartnership taxation: proposals to clarify taxation treatment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Partnership taxation: proposals to clarify taxation treatment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary and recommendations 1.1 We welcome the opportunity to respond to
More informationRoyalties Withholding Tax Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Royalties Withholding Tax Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 We refer to consultation document on Royalties Withholding Tax published on 1 December 2017. We welcome the
More informationHMT: Reforms to the taxation of nondomiciles. The Law Society's response November The Law Society. All rights reserved.
HMT: Reforms to the taxation of nondomiciles The Law Society's response November 2015 2015 The Law Society. All rights reserved. 1. The Law Society is the professional body for solicitors in England and
More information1 Executive Summary. Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
Salary sacrifice for the provision of benefits in kind HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 LITRG welcomes the
More informationThe tax status of credit unions
The tax status of credit unions An issues paper 6 September 2000 Prepared by: The Treasury Ministry of Economic Development Policy Advice Division of Inland Revenue The tax status of credit unions: an
More informationCorporation Tax, etc (clauses and related schedules)
Further written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation (clauses 19-32 and related schedules) (FB18) Representation from the Chartered Institute of Taxation for Public Bill Committee
More informationTAXING GAINS MADE BY NON-RESIDENTS ON UK IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
TAXING GAINS MADE BY NON-RESIDENTS ON UK IMMOVABLE PROPERTY Response by the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 The Association of Taxation Technicians (ATT) is pleased to have the opportunity
More informationTAXREP 22/14 (ICAEW REPRESENTATION 56/14)
TAXREP 22/14 (ICAEW REPRESENTATION 56/14) ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION REVIEW OF EXISTING VAT LEGISLATION ON PUBLIC BODIES AND TAX EXEMPTIONS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment
More informationIntroduction 1-2. Key point summary 3 7. General comments Detailed comments 18-31
BUSINESS EXPENDITURE ON CARS Representations submitted on 26 February 2009 by the Tax Faculty of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in response to a consultation document Modernising
More informationMaking Tax Digital: interest harmonisation and sanctions for late payment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Making Tax Digital: interest harmonisation and sanctions for late payment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We welcome the fact that the proposed model for
More informationNational Insurance credits changes Response to Department for Work and Pensions consultative document
National Insurance credits changes Response to Department for Work and Pensions consultative document 1. Executive summary and recommendations 1.1. The state pension system has changed a great deal in
More informationESMA s policy orientations on guidelines for UCITS Exchange- Traded Funds and Structured UCITS
ESMA s policy orientations on guidelines for UCITS Exchange- Traded Funds and Structured UCITS Response from the Association of British Insurers Introduction The ABI welcomes the opportunity to respond
More information1 Payrolling of benefits
1 Payrolling of benefits Recommendation 1.1 Our recommendation is that a legislative framework is introduced specifically to permit employers to payroll some or all of their employee benefits (including
More informationSimplifying tax for unincorporated businesses HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Simplifying tax for unincorporated businesses HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Introduction 1.1 LITRG welcomes the opportunity
More informationNational insurance is often overlooked yet it is the largest source of government revenue after income tax.
National Insurance National insurance contributions (NICs) are essentially a tax on earned income. The NICs regime divides income into different classes: Class 1 contributions are payable on earnings from
More informationDraft legislation: Simplification of PAYE Settlement Agreements Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
Draft legislation: Simplification of PAYE Settlement Agreements Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We welcome this opportunity to comment on the draft legislation
More informationHM Treasury Call for Evidence: VAT Registration Threshold Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
HM Treasury Call for Evidence: VAT Registration Threshold Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 Executive Summary 1.1 We agree with the findings of the OTS report to a large extent and
More informationATTRIBUTION OF GAINS TO MEMBERS OF CLOSELY CONTROLLED NON- RESIDENT COMPANIES AND THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS ABROAD
TAXREP 53/12 (ICAEW REP 160/12) ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION ATTRIBUTION OF GAINS TO MEMBERS OF CLOSELY CONTROLLED NON- RESIDENT COMPANIES AND THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS ABROAD Comments submitted on 22 October
More informationSummary Report Responses to the public consultation on the special scheme for small enterprises under the VAT Directive
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value added tax Brussels, 11 Apr. 17 taxud.c.1(2017) 2171823 Summary Report Responses to the
More information1 Executive Summary UK REPRESENTATIVE BODY ON THE CONFEDERATION FISCALE EUROPEENNE
Employee Benefits and Expenses Real time collection of tax on benefits in kind and expenses through Voluntary Payrolling HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) consultation document Response from the Low Incomes
More informationPhasing out the Default Retirement Age Response to Department for Business, Innovation and Skills consultative document
Phasing out the Default Retirement Age Response to Department for Business, Innovation and Skills consultative document 1. Executive summary 1.1. Our response to this consultation focuses attention on
More informationHMRC Tax-Free Childcare: Draft Guidance for comment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG)
HMRC Tax-Free Childcare: Draft Guidance for comment Response from the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) 1 General comments 1.1 We welcome this opportunity to comment on the Tax-Free Childcare (TFC)
More informationMODERN WORKING PRACTICES: EMPLOYMENT STATUS RULES FOR EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AND TAX/NIC
L ICAEW REPRESENTATION 45/18 MODERN WORKING PRACTICES: EMPLOYMENT STATUS RULES FOR EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AND TAX/NIC ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Employment status rules for employment
More informationRetrospective Taxation A discussion paper by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
Retrospective Taxation A discussion paper by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1. Introduction and summary 1.1. This paper sets out the views of the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) on retrospective
More informationMoney Laundering Regulations 2017
Money Laundering Regulations 2017 A public consultation issued by HM Treasury Comments from April 2017 Ref: TECH-CDR-1535 (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is the global body for professional
More informationTransforming bailiff action, Ministry of Justice consultation paper CP5/2012
Transforming bailiff action, Ministry of Justice consultation paper CP5/2012 Response by the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group, incorporating comments from the Chartered Institute of Taxation and TaxAid 1.
More informationCOMBAR RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION: SHARED PARENTAL LEAVE
COMBAR RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION: SHARED PARENTAL LEAVE Introduction 1. The Commercial Bar Association ( COMBAR ) is a specialist bar association representing self-employed and employed barristers who practise
More informationOffshore employment intermediaries
Offshore employment intermediaries Who is likely to be affected? Offshore employers and agencies, whose workers are engaged in the UK or on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS). UK and UKCS workers, who are
More informationRegulation of insolvency practice
Regulation of insolvency practice Consultation response 17 March 2015 Introduction 1. This report summarises the feedback that we received during our recent consultation on the regulation of insolvency
More informationCONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made on this day 20 BETWEEN:
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made on this day 20 BETWEEN: ( the Company ) Princess Mary House, 4 Bluecoats Avenue, Hertford, SG14 1PB and... (the Sub-Contractor) of......... IT IS HEREBY AGREED
More informationVOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE OF ERRORS ON INDIRECT TAX RETURNS
VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE OF ERRORS ON INDIRECT TAX RETURNS A submission made on 29 October 2007 by the Tax Faculty of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in response to a consultation
More informationTAXREP 39/11 ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION CONSULTATION ON THE ABOLITION OF 36 TAX RELIEFS
TAXREP 39/11 ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION CONSULTATION ON THE ABOLITION OF 36 TAX RELIEFS Comments submitted in August 2011 by the Tax Faculty of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW)
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 166/16 TAX REPRESENTATION
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 166/16 TAX REPRESENTATION Lease Accounting Changes: Tax Response ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the discussion draft Lease Accounting Changes: Tax Response published
More informationRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDITS: RESPONSE AND FURTHER CONSULTATION
TAXREP 46/11 ICAEW TAX REPRESENTATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDITS: RESPONSE AND FURTHER CONSULTATION Comments submitted in August 2011 by the Tax Faculty of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
More informationCAPITAL GAINS TAX: PAYMENT WINDOW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GAINS (PAYMENT ON ACCOUNT) Issued 6 June 2018
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 64/18 CAPITAL GAINS TAX: PAYMENT WINDOW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY GAINS (PAYMENT Issued 6 June 2018 ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Capital gains tax: Payment window
More informationBUSINESSEUROPE RESPONSE TO IASB DISCUSSION PAPER ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
LETTER OF COMMENT NO. 4(/> 7 April 2009 BUSINESSEUROPE RESPONSE TO IASB DISCUSSION PAPER ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION BUSINESSEUROPE welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposals set out
More informationDifferent ways of working: problems with the tax system
Different ways of working: problems with the tax system Helen Miller Tax due ( ) The tax system penalizes employment Tax due on a job generating 40,000, 2017 18 14,000 12,146 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000
More informationBEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and other financial payments Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
BEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and other financial payments Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to respond to the
More informationMAKING TAX DIGITAL: INTEREST HARMONISATION AND SANCTIONS FOR LATE PAYMENT
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 29/18 MAKING TAX DIGITAL: INTEREST HARMONISATION AND ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Making Tax Digital: interest harmonisation and sanctions for late payment consultation
More informationCorporate Control & Accounting
Corporate Control & Accounting Het Overloon 1, Heerlen P.O. Box 6500, 6401 JH Heerlen, The Netherlands Phone (+31) 45 578 2246, Fax (+31) 45 578 2595 DSM l*> P.O. Box 6500, 6401 JH Heerfen, "Hie Netherlands
More informationTACKLING OFFSHORE TAX EVASION: STRENGTHENING CIVIL DETERRENTS
TACKLING OFFSHORE TAX EVASION: STRENGTHENING CIVIL DETERRENTS Response by the Association of Taxation Technicians 1 Introduction 1.1 The Association of Taxation Technicians (ATT) is pleased to have the
More information