W0EST BRIDGEWATER PLANNING BOARD 7/19/17. PRESENT: H. Hurley, H. Anderson, G. Stetson, A. Kinahan and J. Noyes

Transcription

1 W0EST BRIDGEWATER PLANNING BOARD 7/19/17 PRESENT: H. Hurley, H. Anderson, G. Stetson, A. Kinahan and J. Noyes ABSENT: None The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. 1. Pearl Road: Larry Silva of Silva Engineering and Robert Fox were present. Mr. Silva submitted a "Construction Compliance Plan" for the Board's review. He stated that this plan is an attempt to address the multiple construction issues at the West Meadow Woods subdivision that need to be repaired/modified/installed and/or replaced before the Board will releasa the surety ald then turn the Proxerty over to the Homeownår's Association. This includes repairs to the manholes, road, retaining wall, water lines, lajdscaping, encroachments, curbs, gates and debris removal that were discovered when the Boavd did a walk-through at the site a few weeks ago. Mr. Silva stated that most of the issues that$were listed as his pesponsibility have been reviewed and this plan will hopefully address all of the concerns. Mr. Silva stated that most of the problemr on the catch basins and }anholes were`located between Lots 31 through"38 and!have been patched!nd infraredded.0 He stated that there awe a number of items in tje process of being addressed and many others that have not yet been started. Mr.$Hurley suggested that the{ go through the list item by item. Mb. Silva stated that none of the listed items have been"started yet, but would begin soon. He stated that he had investigated the items that were his responsi"ility and the results are as follows: Item # 7 - Wall does encroach - The property line has been staked out for adjustment - Watson Excavating is to take care of this, Item #10 - Wall not constructed per design must be constructed. Mr. Silva stated that he had spoken to Mr. Hurley about using rip rap instead, but has since decided to construct the wall per the design - Watson Excavating will do this. Item #13 - Install missing bound with road box access - Mr. Silva stated that he wanted to use a railroad spike. The Board agreed that this would be fine as it is in the middle of someone s driveway. Item #18 - Water follows sewer trench Watson Excavating to install a relief drain. Mr. Hurley asked what they would be doing. Mr. Silva stated that they would use stone to create a path for the water to flow to the drain. Mr. Silva noted that no stops were put in. Mr. Noyes asked if it would be day lighted at the end. Mr. Silva stated that it would be. Item #20 - Water follows electric trench - relief drain to be installed. Mr. Silva stated that this would be done similar to Item #18 above. He stated that when they do the drains it will go by the electric trench which will relieve the problem. He stated that the drain will catch all of the runoff.

2 West Bridgewater Planning Board Page 2 Item #22 - Wall not installed per design - must be completed. Mr. Silva stated that this is just like item #10 above; the wall will be built to the design. Item #23 - Sidewalk replacement needed - Watson Excavating will do. Mr. Silva stated that the sidewalk will be replaced from House #10 to the end of the sidewalk at House #20. He stated that they may need to go even further based on what they find when they get started. Mr. Hurley questioned whether this was the only place that was done? Mr. Silva stated that he wasn t sure. Mr. Hurley asked if anyone had actually dug down. Mr. Silva stated that they didn t. He noted that the work was done by Cooper, not Watson. He stated that they will go to the limits; and then verify everything to the Board. Item #24 - See comment #20 Item 26 & 27 - See comment #23 Item # s Has been completed with infrared. Mr. Silva stated that the list was hard to gauge. He stated that on Spring Street Extension where there is an encroachment, they will go around the Spadea property and keep everything in the open space. He stated that they would do away with the break-away gate; there was not one there and none was needed. He stated that it doesn t cut into Spring Street. He noted that what they were showing negates the effectiveness of having a gate. Mr. Anderson noted that if people can t come in, they will just go over the lawns if there is a gate there preventing them from access. The Board agreed that it was okay to eliminate the gate. Mr. Noyes questioned the corner radius and asked if they were changing it. Mr. Silva stated that they were not. Mr. Noyes stated that he liked it the way it was and didn t want them to change it. Mr. Silva agreed. It was also suggested that they keep the pavement at the mailbox area. Mr. Hurley asked what the time line for completion might be. Mr. Fox stated that he has his people ready to start tomorrow and finish up as soon as they can. Mr. Stetson asked when they connect to the drainage at house #21, would it do away with the rain garden on the property. He stated that when the drain wasn t connected it created a lot of water problems. He stated that when they dug down six to eight (6-8 ) feet they hit water. Mr. Silva stated that the rain garden was no longer there. Mr. Stetson disagreed and noted that when he was there last night the rain garden was still there. He asked if when they hookup the pipes will it take care of the problem? Mr. Silva stated that it would. Mr. Noyes asked what was being done about the Utility issues. Mr. Fox stated that as owners had cable installed it created some of the problems. He stated that he would contact the utility company and have them come in and do everything at one time. Mr. Silva noted the Watson will work with them to make sure it all gets done. It was noted that one of the electrical boxes was installed much too low, which was apparent when they saw the wet stains from the runoff on the box.

3 West Bridgewater Planning Board Page 3 Mr. Hurley stated that it looks like everything will be addressed as requested by the Board. He asked Mr. Fox when he expected to have everything completed. Mr. Fox stated that he expected that it would be done within thirty (30) days. Mr. Kinahan asked if this included the wall construction. Mr. Fox stated that it would. He stated that he would compile a report for the Board and asked if they could come back to the September 6 th meeting. Mr. Silva noted that at that time, the Board could take action to move the process along to get the subdivision released and into the hands of the Homeowner s Association. Mr. Noyes asked if the Board should go out at the end of August to do a final walk through to make sure that everything is completed to their satisfaction. Board members agreed that they could go out in groups of two (2) so that it would not be considered a meeting and would not need to be posted or an agenda created. Mr. Stetson noted that he would refrain from any discussion or vote due to the possible conflict of interest Ash Street: Edward Jacobs and Greg Driscoll of JD Engineering were present. Also present was Robert Fletcher. The Board received a Form A and plans from Jacobs Driscoll Engineering on behalf of Alan Doty for the above site. Mr. Jacobs stated that they had been before the Board back in April and did a Form A plan to divide Assessor's Map 47, Lot 31 into 5 lots which the Board approved. He stated that when the plan went before the Conservation Commission there were several issues that arose. Mr. Jacobs stated that the first concern was that proposed House #21 was surrounded by pavement with three driveways planned. They suggested that proponents move the driveway for Lot 3. Mr. Jacobs stated that the second issue was that proponents had planned to donate the eighteen (18) acre wetland area, (the non buildable lot) to the Conservation Commission who decided that they don t want it. As a result, Mr. Jacobs stated that they had extended the Lot lines all the way back to the rear of the property which make each lot much larger than before. He noted that the non buildable lot now consists of only nine (9) acres. Mr. Hurley noted that the frontage is illusionary but that is the Building Inspector s problem. Mr. Jacob stated that he had already shown it to Mr. White and that he has no problem with the plan. Mr. Hurley stated that each lot meets the frontage and area requirements, all of the lots have the required one hundred (100 x 100 ) foot squares and that there are no gerrymandered lots proposed. He stated that the plan meets the requirements for a Form A plan. Mr. Stetson asked where the lot comes out along South Main Street. Mr. Jacobs started that it was across the street$from the Snell property. Mr. Jacobs stated that th% lot is so wet thct no one would be able to comg in or leave onto South Main Street from this property. Mr. Fletcher asked if he could be heard since this is why he was here. He stated thav he and twelve (12) other abutters to the site had attended the Conserva4ion Commission meetings and are very concerned. He stated that they were told it wasn t wetlands. He also stated that both proposå` driveways are directly across the street from his property and the proposet driveways will be threå hundred (300 ) veet in length. He stated that the drainage pipes will be under the driveways a.d he was concerned that this would create pondage. Mr. Fletcher ³tated that

4 I continwed: West Fridgewater Planning Board Minutes of 7o19/17 Page 4 where the l`nd meets Ash Street, it is alwiys wet and that no a#tive drainage is proposed to take the water off thå site. He stated that none of the neighbor s issues have(been addressed and questioned how much water would end up on their properties as a result of this development. He also questioned if or where there will be fire hydrants required. He stated that because this is not a subdivision that they can do what they want without any regard to the neighboring property owners. Mr. Hurley told Mr. Fletcher that unfortunately, the only criteria that the Planning Board has jurisdiction on a Form A Plan is to ensure the lots have frontage, area and access. He suggested that the Highway Department, Conservation Commission, Board of Health and Building Inspector are in charge of the rest. Mr. Fletcher stated that the land is so wet now and this will just make it much worse. He questioned why the Town couldn t require proponents to put in drainage, especially as there is no culvert system in place. He stated that the proponents are just getting passed through each Board with no concern for the established homeowners. Mr. Hurley stated that proponents will still have to get approval from the Conservation Commission and Board of Health and suggested that they watch the progress and report the problems as they occur. Mr. Fletcher stated that the driveways will all be elevated and extend to the back of the lots. Mr. Driscoll stated that there a swale is proposed for area between the two (2) driveways which should catch the water. Mr. Fletcher asked when this will all come before the Building Inspector. Mr. Hurley replied that happens once whoever is building it begins construction. Mr. Fletcher stated that it would probably be sold to a developer and the fact that there is no plan for the runoff, it would probably create lagoons. He stated that the whole plan is flawed, proponents don t know the land, and by the time the problems exist, they will all be long gone. Mr. Fletcher stated that he would stay on top of this and then stormed out of the meeting. A Motion (HA) was made to endorse the Form A and plans submitted by JD Engineering on behalf of Alan Doty for the property located at 161 Ash Street as presented. Second (GS). Vote: Unanimous. 3. South Elm and Lincoln Street: Michael Koska of Koska Engineering and developer, Charles Macy of CLM Development, LLC were present. Mr. Koska and Mr. Macy had requested to meet with the Board for an information only discussion regarding their plans for the above site currently owned by Naomi Alexander. Mr. Koska stated that this property consists of acres and already has two (2) homes on the site. He stated that frontage runs along Lincoln Street and up to the house located at #345 South Elm Street. Mr. Koska stated that Lots 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8 contain 30,000 square feet with 150 frontage. Lot 3 has 270 feet of frontage with 260,000 square feet and Lot 5, 138,821 square feet. He noted that the existing dwellings are on Lot 4 and Lot 7 and would not be changed in any way at this time except possibly some cosmetic work and maybe an upgrade to the septic systems. He stated that Lot 5 has an area of wetlands at the front of the property. Mr. Koska asked how the one hundred (100 x 100 ) foot squares should be placed on the curved lots. Mr. Hurley explained the process and noted that they must be at the 35 setback lines.

5 West Bridgewater Planning Board Page 5 Mr. Koska stated that in order to gain access to the back of Lot 5, there would need to be a twenty (20 ) foot wide easement. He stated that they had met with the Conservation Commission last evening and as a result, may need to provide a twenty (20 ) foot driveway instead. He stated that Ms. Alexander, who also owns the abutting property, has agreed to convey the area needed for the driveway to Mr. Macy. Mr. Macy stated that he had discussed this option with the Building Inspector and that he was fine with it. Mr. Koska stated that whichever way they go, they will make sure it is spelled out on the plans. Mr. Stetson stated that his only concern was if the Board could restrict the land to ensure that no one could come in later and use that driveway as a path to further development. He reminded that Board about the issue with the Chubbuck property. Mr. Hurley stated that if it was an easement, then they couldn t do it. It was noted that the Conservation Commission also wants a buffer zone created. Mr. Stetson also reminded the Board that there had been an issue on Spring Street and that the ZBA had allowed an exception. Mr. Macy stated that they would probably be better off with an easement. Mr. Koska explained the drainage pattern on the property. He stated that there is a pipe that goes across the street and drains water off this site. He noted that they thought it might have been plugged, but upon inspection it appears to be intact. He noted that the rest of the water drains off to the rear of the property. Mr. Hurley reminded proponents that at long as the lots meet the frontage, area and one hundred (100 ) foot square requirements the Board would endorse the Form A plan. Mr. Koska questioned the Board s requirements for upland. Mr. Hurley stated that those requirements are for subdivisions, not Form A lots. He stated that if proponents asked his personal opinion, he would say he doesn t like this plan, but if it is legal, then the Board would endorse it. Mr. Hurley asked whether proponents thought the Conservation Commission would approve this plan. Mr. Koska stated that this was a good question. Mr. Hurley stated that they may say that proponents created the problems on Lot 3. Mr. Koska stated that they hoped there would be some give and take as other towns have been known to do, but would find out. He stated that they would have to have the wetland lines delineated before they proceed. Mr. Koska thanked the Board for their attention and guidance. 4. Elm Terrace: The Board was notified by Treasurer/Collector, John Duggan that the surety account for the above subdivision has been set up according to the Board's directive in the amount of sixty thousand ($60,000) dollars by developer, Charles Macy. It was also noted that the Form J Lot Release for both Lots 1 & 2 were released`to Mr. Macy so that he could obtain building permits. As Mr. Kosk! and Mr. Macy were here on another matter, Mr. Stetson stated that he had a question regarding the drainage at the above site. Èe stated that he has visited the site and that it appeared that the draknage had only ½ of the stone i. and icked if thés was still(under construct)on or if it was finished. Mr. Mecy stated that it was not finishåd yet. Mr. Stetson also questioned if the grade, closest to tèe railpoad, wilm be brought to all one level. Mr. Macy staued that it would be. Mr. Stetson suggested that he dress it up.!mr. Macy agreed to do so.

6 West BridgeWater PlannIng Board Page 6 I Wdst Center Street: Mr. Hurley questioned whether there has been any plans submitted or contact made from anyone from Shaw s regarding the removal of the underground storage tank and installation of the smaller above ground stopage tan+ next to the building. It was reported that no contact has been made and no site plans submitted. 6. Mahoney Place: Mr. Hurley reported that he had spoken to Building Inspector, Michael White, regarding an attempt to get a building permit for the above one (1) Lot Subdivision located off of Bedford Street by the new owner of the property. Mr. Hurley informed Mr. White that the owner would have to present a Form J Lot Release before he could get a building permit. It was noted that this subdivision was approved back in It was also noted that the new owner had come in to get the forms and was expected to appear at tonight s meeting to discuss the process with the Board however he never showed up. 7. Component Property: Mr. Hurley reported that he had been contacted by Building Inspector, Michael White, regarding the above property. He reported that the new owners are preparing a site plan for review but have requested that they be allowed to have a trailer on site and do some interior work only. Mr. Hurley stated that he gave his permission for them to do so as long as no exterior work is done until the site plan review is held. 8. Lamp Post Estates: Public Hearing continuation 8:00 p.m. The Board received a request from Pilling Engineering to continue the public hearing for Lamp Post Estates until the next meeting on August 2, A Motion (AK) was made to continue the public hearing until the next meeting on August 2, 2017 at 8:00 p.m. Second (GS). Vote: Unanimous. A copy of the request will be forwarded to the Town Clerk for the record. Mr. Hurley reported that he had ed Todd Pilling, of Pilling Engineering to advise him that the Board's Engineer, Nicholas Lanney, would be on vacation July 7th through July 25th. He suggested that Mr. Pilling, if either set of revised plans (Luke Estates or Lamp Post Estates) were ready, that he submit them to the Planning Board and get a full size set to Mr. Lanney, as soon as possible. He noted that there were no guarantees that Mr. Lanney would be able to fit it in before his vacati/n. He Also noted that Mr.`Pilling did not receive the comments that addressed Mr. Lanney's issues, so he had zesent them on June 6th. When Mr.0Pilling submitted his revised plans to the Board, he was instructed to forward copies on to Mr. Lanney for his review. In a letter dated July 7, 2017, Mr. L`nnay reported to Mr. Hurl%y that he had received revised sõbdivision plans datdd Jene 14, 2017 and Drainage$Analysis report revised June 12, 2017 from Pillinc Engineering. He stated that he has attempted to`review the plans and r%port, but found

7 that nõmerous incojsistencies in the information on the plans and report which made it very difficult and u~productive. He(noted that following examples: MWest Brifgewater Planning Board West Brifgewater Planning Board Mhnutes of 7/19/17 Page 7 For the basin on Lot 1 also referrud to as the Front Basin Shået 4 Emergency Spilhway at el 70.1 SHeet 5 OCS-1 Detail 6 inch wide opening at el 69.4 Grate at el (no sizing of Grate) Sheet 6 Section Through Basin 1 6 inch orifice at el 69.4 Grate at Sheet 7 OCS-1 Detail 4 inch orifice at el 69.4 Trash rack over orifice but no detail of opening size for trash rack No grate or spillway Drainage Calculation 4 inch orifice at el ft long by 3 ft wide broad crested weir at el Mr. Lanney stated that he has the same concerns about the basin on Lot 4. Mr. Lanney also stated that he has a concern that a four (4 ) inch diameter orifice is prone to clogging and may require routine maintenance to keep the basin from holding water for an extended period of time. The plans also call for a reduction in the separation of the bottom of the basin to the seasonal high water table to less than two (2 ) feet. In combination, these two factors may lead to the development of wetland vegetation in the bottom of the basin. Mr. Hurley responded that he has forwarded the response to Mr. Pilling and advised him again of Mr. Lanney's vacation schedule. He suggested that Mr. Pilling take some time to review the plans and report so that it can be re-submitted to Mr. Lanney upon his return. He also reminded Mr. Pilling that the public hearing had been continued to this meeting and that the Board would need a request for a further continuance in writing. Mr. Pilling reported that he had made some changes which obviously didn't get corrected on all sheets. He stated that he would fix them all. He noted that as to the four (4") inch orifice, he would eliminate it and the trash racks will be posted with the information on their construction. Mr. Pilling stated that he was still awaiting Allen and Major s comments (from the Conservation Commission) and once he gets those, he will revise the plans and calculations for re-submittal. Mr. Pilling also stated that a request for another continuance will be provided under separate .

8 West Bridgewater Planning Board Page 8 9. Luke Estates: Public Hearing continuation 8:00 p.m. The Board received a request from Pilling Engineering to continue the public hearing for Luke Estates until the next meeting on August 2, A Motion (AK) was made to continue the public hearing until the next meeting on August 2, 2017 at 8:00 p.m. Second (GS). Vote: Unanimous. A copy of the request will be forwarded to the Town Clerk for the record. Mr. Hurley stated that he had taken a look at the revised plans that were submitted by Mr. Pilling and noted the following: 1. Lots 1, 2 and 3 Mr. Hurley stated that Mr. Pilling apparently doesn t know what the word gerrymandered means but these three (3) lots are definitely gerrymandered to get the required frontage and therefore do not meet the requirements, 2. Sheet 3 drainage easement the owner of one property will be looking over another person s property; similar to what was done at B.C. Way. This is even worse when you get to Lots 2 & 3, 3. Lot 2 just barely meets the requirements for frontage, 4. Profile sheet normally reads from left to right this is not the case on this plan. Mr. Noyes stated that he has seen this done before, but not very often and is not preferable, 5. Pipe cover there is not enough cover over the pipes; does not meet the requirements, 6. Section Reserve strip does not comply Mr. Hurley had suggested that they use the full 50 and wouldn t need a wall when referred back to Sheet 5 the grading is in the sidewalk area (in the 8 strip), 7. There is supposed to be a 2% slope shown on the road cross section Mr. Pilling has a one to three (1-3) percent slope at the end of the cul-de-sac and the same thing is done on Lot 4. Mr. Hurley noted that he has proposed an eight (8 ) foot slope because it is too tight a fit to do it right. He also noted that Mr. Pilling has brought it right up to the edge of Lots 3, 4, 5 6 & On Lots 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 there is only ten (10 ) feet between the house and the septic system - the requirement is for twenty (20 ) feet. Mr. Hurley stated that they are trying to squeeze everything in. Mr. Kinahan stated it is like putting 10 pounds in a 5 pound bag. Mr. Stetson stated that they should make it a six (6) lot subdivision. Mr. Hurley stated that there should only be five (5) lots. Mr. Hurley stated that, at

9 this point in his review, he was so angry with what they were trying to do that he put the plans down and ended his review. West Bridgewater Planning Board Page West Chestnut Street, Brockton: Mr. Noyes reported that someone who wishes to remain anonymous updated him on the status of the above subdivision. He noted that proponents had received approval for the roadway and water connections which have been partially installed (a 100' gravel road and fencing) however they have not received approval from the Brockton Planning Board. Proponents are scheduled to meet with the Brockton Planning Board on August 1, It was noted that this Board would not even look at any plans until such time as the project is approved by Brockton. It was also noted that the installation of the road and fence were most likely done to intimidate the neighbors to the site who are totally against this project. The Board will await further development. 11. Reviewing Engineer Search: Mr. Hurley reminded the Board members that their review engineer, Nicolas Lanney, will be retiring at the end of this year and has agreed that he would finish reviewing the Lamp Post Estates, Luke Estates and Spring Commons subdivisions for the Board. Mr. Hurley reported that he had spoken to Azu Etoniru, who is currently the Town Engineer for Bridgewater, to see if he might be interested in becoming the Board s replacement for Mr. Lanney. He noted that Mr. Etoniru stated that he would be interested. Mr. Hurley stated that he had informed Mr. Etoniru that the Board would be interviewing other engineers before they made any final decisions. Mr. Stetson noted that Mr. Etoniru has not done many projects in West Bridgewater of late. Mr. Hurley noted that the last one was on Cyr Street about two (2) years ago. Mr. Stetson asked if the Board is at the point that they need to have someone on retainer. Mr. Hurley stated that it would be nice to have someone qualified to monitor the ongoing projects. Mr. Noyes stated that his company does work for Seekonk and briefly described the process. He noted that the cost to do this is somewhere between five and eight thousand ($5,000-$8,000) dollars for them to review a project. Mr. Hurley questioned whether the Board members have any possible candidates in mind that might be interested in the position. Mr. Noyes suggested that the Board might consider hiring a field engineer. He noted that, if they had someone watching the Pearl Road project, it might not have become such a mess. Mr. Stetson suggested that maybe the Board could come up with a way to notify the Highway Department and have them watch these projects. Mr. Noyes suggested that they could have Mr. Etoniru for the drainage and then maybe a construction guy to monitor the building end of it. Mr. Hurley noted that Mr. Etoniru has several people working for him that may be available. Mr. Noyes stated that it would not be any cost to the Town, since the fees would be paid for by the developers. Mr. Stetson noted that these subdivisions are getting complicated. Mr. Noyes agreed to research the process and pricing for the Board. 12. Green Meadows Subdivision: Mr. Hurley reported that he had been contacted with the request to provide the list of items that need to be corrected on Copper Beech Road in the above subdivision. He stated that he had

10 created a spreadsheet with all of the issues that need to be addressed and would forward it on to the person that had contacted him. West Bridgewater Planning Board Page Meadow Spring Subdivision: Mr. Hurley reported that he had spoken with the office of Attorney Robert Pellegrini regarding the release of the surety for the above property. He stated that he advised that the deed descriptions and street acceptance plan for the roadway do not agree and will need to be remedied. Mr. Hurley also advised that they get a copy of the subdivision rules and regulations, go through them, and make sure that each requirement has been met. Once this has been addressed and all the required paperwork has been submitted and reviewed, the Board will schedule a public hearing to discuss the release the surety. In a separate conversation they were advised that if they have any further questions, they should come to a meeting. 14. Bresciani Estates: The Board received a memo from Treasurer/Collector, John Duggan, reporting that he had refunded the surety for the above subdivision to developer, Joseph Correia. He noted that he had retained $500 for the recording fees for the street acceptance and as-built plans. Once the roadway has been accepted at a town meeting, any remaining funds left after the recording costs will be refunded to Mr. Correia. 15. West Center/Lincoln Street: The Board received an from Building Inspector, Michael White, regarding a proposal to construct a retail shopping plaza at the above address. Mr. White stated that he was looking for a set of plans for the last proposal, rezoning information, or any other information that may be available for the previously proposed retail shopping center. He also asked for any known obstacles at this point that he might not be aware of. He stated that he has no records pertaining to this project and was not sure how far it got before it stalled out. 16. FY17 Budget: It was reported that the FY17 budget was overdrawn by $1,312 due to the increased work load and hours worked for the Board's secretary. This was not unexpected as the salary line item is an estimated amount subject to additional hours needed and has happened before. Town Administrator, David Gagne, reported that he would request that the Board of Selectmen and the Finance Committee to transfer the funds necessary to cover the deficit. Mr. Hurley signed the paperwork for the transfer of funds. He noted that the Town Administrator and the Finance Committee were concerned that historically this line item is overdrawn, and that there were no documents for them to review to see what is actually being done. It was pointed out to the Board that documentation for every hour worked has been kept, and have been available to the Board over the last 19 years. The Board was in agreement, that these documents become part of the official record from here on. 17. MAIL: Brockton City Council public hearing 7/26/17, re: ordinance amendments. E. Bridgewater ZBA decision, re: special permit/variance (s), 119 Bedford St. (CVS) granted. E. Bridgewater ZBA decision, re: appeal, 335 East Street, decision upheld. E. Bridgewater Planning public hearing 4/10/17, re: special permit, 607 Bedford St. granted.

11 E. Bridgewater ZBA decision, re: appeal, 37 Oak Street, decision upheld. West Bridgewater Planning Board Page 11 Mail E. Bridgewater ZBA public hearing 8/2/17, re: variance, 89 Anna Drive. Easton Planning & Zoning decision, re: modification, 424 Foundry Street, approved. Easton ZBA public hearing 8/15/17, re: special permit, 502 Foundry Street. Easton ZBA public hearing 7/18/17, re: variance, 58R Lincoln Street. Easton Planning public hearing 7/24/17, re: modification, 71 Mill Street. Easton ZBA public hearing 7/12/17, re: variance, 30A Depot Street. Easton Planning and ZBA decision, re: 32 Highland Street, approved. Raynham ZBA public hearing 7/12/17, re: appeal, Broadway. Raynham ZBA public hearing 7/12/17, re: special permit, 743 Locust Street. Raynham ZBA public hearing 7/12/17, re: variance, 269 North Main Street. W. Bridgewater ZBA public hearing 7/11/17, re: site plan/special permit, 45 River Street. Woodward and Curran Directions newsletter. Board of Assessor minutes of 5/3/17, 5/17/17 and 6/7/17. Expense Control report of 6/28/17. Expense Ledger report of 6/28/17. Massachusetts Office on Disability workshop information. OCPC minutes of 4/26/17 and agenda for 6/28/17. TTI Environmental, Inc. solicitation for engineering services. Returned mail, re: Bresciani Estates Street Acceptance, release of surety. Treasurer/Collector memos, (2) re: Postage for 3/1/17 through 6/30/ A Motion (HA) was made to pay the secretary payroll for the period ending 7/18/17. Second (AK). Vote: Unanimous. 19. The minutes of 6/21/17 were accepted and filed. 20. The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Donna M. Cotter, Secretary