Denton County Transportation Authority. Service Plan

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Denton County Transportation Authority. Service Plan"

Transcription

1 Transportation Authority Service Plan Originally Approved June 13, 2002 Revisions Approved July 10, 2003 (Prior to September 13, 2003 election) Revisions Approved November 18, 2003 (Following September 13, 2003 election)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... ii OVERVIEW... 1 Introduction... 1 Confirmation Election and Sales and Use Tax Election... 1 Service Plan Revisions... 2 Purpose and Need... 2 Goals, Guiding Principles, and Concepts... 3 SERVICE PLAN... 5 Regional Rail Plan... 5 Park-and-Rides/Regional Rail Facilities Regional Connector Bus Service Local Fixed Route Bus Service Demand Response Service Local Assistance/Corridor Preservation Enhanced Local Assistance Program (ELAP) Short-Term Capital and Operating Costs Financing Plan Sales and Use Tax Rate Implementation of Service NEXT STEPS BACKGROUND TECHNICAL REPORT LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: REGIONAL RAIL... 7 FIGURE 2: REGIONAL RAIL - LONGER-TERM EXPANSION ALTERNATIVES... 9 FIGURE 3: REGIONAL CONNECTOR BUS SERVICE FIGURE 4: LOCAL FIXED ROUTE BUS SERVICE FIGURE 5: DEMAND RESPONSE SERVICE i

3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The URS consultant team of Tim Baldwin, Cinde Weatherby Gilliland, and Scott Bressler wishes to thank the following individuals, whose hard work and countless hours of volunteer effort greatly contributed to the Service Plan development in 2002, and its refinement in Board of Directors ( ) Representing Large Cities with Populations Greater than 12,000: Charles Emery, Lewisville, Chair Van James, Flower Mound Bret Collins, Corinth Mike Leavitt, Highland Village Joe Roy, Denton, Vice Chair John Dillard, The Colony* Vacant, Frisco** Representing Small Cities with Populations between 500 and 12,000: George Purefoy, Frisco Tom Spencer, Shady Shores Bill Walker, Roanoke Representing Unincorporated Areas of Denton County: Charles Correll, Argyle, Treasurer Rick Salazar, Aubrey Representing Denton County At-Large: Jason Pierce, Aubrey, Secretary *Upon election of John Dillard as mayor of The Colony in September 2003, a vacancy was created. **In 2003, the City of Frisco became eligible to make an appointment. Volunteer Local Support Staff Denton County: Cheryl Davis City of Denton: Jon Fortune, Mark Nelson, Stan Nixon City of Lewisville: Greg Anderson City of Highland Village: Laurie Mullens DCTA Contract Staff Scott Neeley, John Bartosiewicz, Robert Babbitt, Desha Creecy ii

4 Interim Executive Committee ( ) Representing Large Cities with Populations Greater than 12,000: Charles Emery, Lewisville, Chair Van James, Flower Mound Kelvin Knauf, Corinth Mike Leavitt, Highland Village Joe Roy, Denton, Vice Chair Tom Terrall, The Colony Representing Small Cities with Populations between 500 and 12,000: George Purefoy, Frisco Tom Spencer, Shady Shores Bill Walker, Roanoke Representing Unincorporated Areas of Denton County: Charles Correll, Argyle Rick Salazar, Aubrey Representing Denton County At-Large: Jason Pierce, Aubrey Denton County Staff: Shala Geer Cheryl Davis SPECIAL NOTE The routes and service levels expressed in this Service Plan are carefully designed and articulated goals, but are specifically subject to and contingent upon environmental review, federal and state funding authorization, and right-of-way acquisition. No specific implementation dates or service levels should be considered final until these project variables are resolved through enforceable, date certain, commitments of the responsible governmental entities. iii

5 OVERVIEW Introduction House Bill 3323 was approved by the 77 th Texas Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in It is now codified as Chapter 460 of the Texas Transportation Code. The law allows creation of a Coordinated County in urban collar counties adjacent to counties with populations of 1,000,000 or more, which includes Denton County. The legislation requires that a Service Plan, an outline of the services that would be provided by an authority when confirmed by the voters, be developed by the. The Denton County Commissioners Court initiated the process to form the Denton County (DCTA) in October The result of the process will be a county public transportation authority that provides public transportation services throughout the authority s service area. The service area is within Denton County. Initially, in 2001 the Denton County Commissioners Court and large municipalities in the County (those with populations above 12,000) made appointments to the DCTA Interim Executive Committee (IEC); the remaining positions were selected by a vote of municipalities with populations between 500 and 12,000. Confirmation Election and Sales and Use Tax Election This document now represents the DCTA s blueprint for transportation facilities, services, and funding options for the citizens of Denton County under the provisions of Chapter 460 of the Texas Transportation Code. This Service Plan was initially approved by the DCTA Interim Executive Committee on June 13, 2002, as required by law prior to the election to confirm the Authority. On November 5, 2002, voters confirmed the authority with a 73 percent approval rate. Votes were canvassed separately for each of the five cities of more than 12,000 in population and for the remainder of the county. The ballot initiative passed in each of the five cities: Corinth, Denton, Flower Mound, Highland Village, and Lewisville. It also passed in the remainder of the county. Subsequently the plan was revised to be submitted to the voters again on September 13, 2003, for consideration and approval of a one-half percent sales and use tax. Those plan revisions were approved by the DCTA Board of Directors (then known as the Executive Committee) on July 10, The Board called for the sales and use tax referendum in the cities of Copper Canyon, Corinth, Denton, Double Oak, Flower Mound, Highland Village, Lewisville, and Shady Shores. The election was successful in the cities of Denton, Highland Village, and Lewisville. Imposition of the sale and use tax dedicated to the authority will begin on January 1,

6 Service Plan Revisions Following the successful confirmation election, the Interim Executive Committee became the Executive Committee. Officers were elected and the Executive Committee committed to reexamining the Service Plan to make any needed enhancements. Primary among the refinements was the need to update the financial elements of the plan to reflect the potential cities participating in the authority and confirm sales and use tax projections. The Service Plan approved July 10, 2003, represented an initial focus on implementation of the regional rail system and services in the rail corridor that included five of the largest cities in the County. A revised Service Plan was approved prior to a sales and use tax election conducted on September 13, Upon the favorable vote approving the establishment of a sales and use tax in the three communities, the Service Plan, as reflected in this document, was further refined to respond to the vote. DCTA will begin to phase in implementation of services outlined in the plan. Only those municipalities approving the sales and use tax are considered as part of the authority s initial Service Area. Communities outside the initial Service Area, but in Denton County, may choose to contract with DCTA for services and/or to participate in a future sales and use tax election with a capital recovery component. Purpose and Need The concept for a Denton County was developed with several basic purposes in mind. The idea for the Authority arose primarily as a result of several issues that, while not unique to Denton County, are problems of major concern: Denton County is forecast to experience unprecedented growth in the coming decades. According to the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) 2030 demographic forecasts adopted April 24, 2003, the County s population is anticipated to increase by 154 percent between 2000 and 2030, compared to the 10 urban counties in the North Central Texas region s projected combined growth rate of 80 percent. The Denton County population is projected to be 545,987 in 2005, up from 428,080 in In addition, employment in the County is forecast to increase by 171 percent, compared to the 72 percent growth rate forecast for the 10 urban counties in the region. Denton and Collin Counties combined account for 25 percent of all of the new job growth in the 2030 NCTCOG forecasts. The actual growth rate experienced by Denton County from 2002 to 2003 was 6.28 percent as estimated by NCTCOG. That compares to Collin County at 4.91 percent, Dallas County at 0.93 percent, and Tarrant County at 3.07 percent. The only county with a higher percentage growth from 2002 to 2003 was Rockwall County with a 6.69 percent population growth. Highway congestion is also forecast to increase dramatically in Denton County. According to NCTCOG, 41 percent of all lane miles in Denton County will experience severe peak period congestion by Denton County drivers will spend 40 percent of their travel time in congested traffic by

7 Finally, highway funding in Denton County is forecast to be unable to keep up with demand for construction needed to help reduce anticipated congestion. Regionwide, NCTCOG s Mobility 2025 report noted that the region will experience a $3.4 billion shortfall (the difference between what is needed and what is available in funding) in freeway and toll road funding between now and The Authority can provide Denton County with a method of addressing many of those short-term and long-range mobility and growth problems by: Providing administrative mechanisms for implementing transportation improvements throughout the County; and Creating a dependable funding base for transportation improvements. With a sales and use tax as a dedicated means of funding, the authority may now plan, design, and construct transportation improvements. Goals, Guiding Principles, and Concepts Service Plan Goals Four goals have been developed to help focus the development of the Service Plan: 1. Improve transportation for the County and region; 2. Maintain and improve Denton County s quality of life; 3. Contribute to air quality improvement; and 4. Promote economic development. Guiding Principles Seven guiding principles were used throughout the creation of the Denton County Transportation Authority Service Plan. 1. Provide maximum coverage; 2. Provide a moderate level of service depending on demand; 3. Promote maximum cost-effectiveness and opportunities for federal funding; 4. Focus on linkages between local service and regional bus and rail; 5. Promote the system s seamless connections with the other regional transportation systems; 6. Focus on activity centers; and 7. Focus on future expansion of the transportation system as population and demand warrant. Service Plan Development Concepts and Trade-Offs A number of concepts were kept in mind as the Service Plan was developed: 1. There should be a mix of service concepts; 2. The Service Plan must be affordable; 3. The Service Plan should be flexible and able to adapt to changing conditions in the short-term and long-term; 4. The Service Plan should benefit the entire County; 5. The Plan should be a component in a seamless regional transportation system; and 6. The Plan should maximize ridership. 3

8 As the Service Plan was developed, the Interim Executive Committee discussed a number of trade-offs. These trade-offs help ensure that the Service Plan is balanced demographically and fiscally. They include: 1. Providing maximum coverage while maximizing cost-effectiveness (cost per rider); 2. Considering the extent of the use of passenger rail service and bus service; 3. Balancing service between transit-dependent riders and service to choice (new) transit riders; and 4. Balancing local service and regional service. 4

9 SERVICE PLAN The Service Plan includes a rail component and three layers of bus service, including Regional Connector Bus Service, Local Routes, and Demand Response Service, as well as a network of Park-and-Rides/Regional Rail and Bus Facilities to serve citizens in Denton County. These elements will provide services to help mitigate and improve many mobility issues in the near term, as well as link the County s larger cities to rail when that service is implemented. The DCTA plan recognizes that Denton County is part of the greater Dallas-Fort Worth region and respects its importance as a component in the regional transportation system. In implementing the plan, DCTA will seek to work closely with Dallas Area Rapid Transit, the Fort Worth, and the North Central Texas Council of Governments to make connections to regional services. Regional Rail Plan Overview Regional rail is the central element of the Denton County s Service Plan. The Service Plan s concept is to implement initial rail service in Denton County to connect with Dallas Area Rapid Transit light rail transit (LRT) facilities. At a minimum, it is DCTA s intent to work as a partner with DART to develop as seamless a service as possible for DCTA and DART riders. There may also be an opportunity to work with DART, through regional funding support by the metropolitan planning organization (NCTCOG and the Regional Transportation Council) to develop regional rail service to the planned Belt Line Road Intermodal Transportation Center. That would allow not only north-south service between Denton and Dallas County destinations, but also eventual east-west services along the Cotton Belt rail corridor, and the possibility of service directly to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. Future regional rail extensions to Denton and other key areas of the county will be implemented as additional sales and use tax and other funding permits. Rail service is initially conceived as operating at 30-minute headways during peak periods and 60-minute headways during off-peak times and weekends. Vehicles The vehicle being considered for regional rail service is a type of Diesel-Multiple Unit (DMU) vehicle, as depicted in this rendering. DMU s are self-propelled diesel-powered trains that operate in trainsets of one to three passenger cars. Newer generations of DMU s, called regional rail vehicles, are approaching light rail vehicles in service characteristics and appearance. For purposes of this Service Plan, the estimated capital cost used for regional rail is $12 million per mile, similar to NCTCOG s regionwide per-mile unit cost for commuter rail. 5

10 Proposed Short Term Service It is the policy objective of DCTA to provide rail service that meets the Dallas Area Rapid Transit LRT services in Carrollton when that service begins. DCTA intends to phase in services as soon as possible, possibly beginning services from Lewisville by , with continuation of service from Denton by The planned commuter rail service is approximately 20 miles long. The schedule for implementing services anticipates that service to Lewisville could begin two to three years prior to service to Denton. This proposed service would use the former Union Pacific (UP) right-of-way that runs generally parallel to I-35E from North Carrollton to Denton. A part of the right-of-way is now in use as a trail in the Rails to Trails program. That property is owned by the City of Denton and includes a pedestrian and bike trail in the rail right-of-way. DART owns the passenger rail operating rights in the entire former railroad right-of-way from Denton to Carrollton. DART owns the property from the area of FM 2181 south to Carrollton and beyond. Proposed stations to serve the Lewisville and Highland Village area would be at the railroad s intersection with the SH-121 bypass on the south side of Lewisville, in downtown Lewisville east of I-35E near the City s Old Town revitalization area, and in North Lewisville in the vicinity of FM 407 near I-35E. Proposed stations to serve Denton would be in south Denton and in downtown Denton. The estimated capital cost of the service from Carrollton to Lewisville is $132 million. An estimate of the capital cost of service between Lewisville and Denton is $108 million. The alternatives analysis process, required prior to application for federal funding to support the project, must include an evaluation of all viable alternative alignments, including the railroad right-of-way, the highway right-of-way, and any other available right-of-way in the corridor, as well as the potential for alternative modes of service such as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Another alternative option is to use the Kansas City Southern (KCS) railroad line just north of FM-407 to Denton. This would terminate west of downtown Denton near the University of North Texas (UNT) campus. There is also an opportunity to exit the KCS railroad corridor just south of Denton, and use the Union Pacific (UP) railroad right-of-way into downtown Denton. The locally preferred alignment will be determined in the alternatives analysis process. Any alternatives for this segment will consider impacts on adjacent properties before a final alignment decision is made. 6

11 FIGURE 1: REGIONAL RAIL 7

12 Proposed Longer-Term Expansion Alternatives Several corridors are proposed for potential implementation after the Denton to Carrollton regional rail service begins (see Figure 2). It is estimated that the agency will have no additional funding capacity to construct additional rail segments until the Denton to Carrollton rail infrastructure is completed. As that date approaches, DCTA will be able to evaluate the then existing conditions and prioritize any additional service implementation. The proposed potential future expansion corridors are: Lewisville to DFW International Airport This future line would follow the SH-121 alignment from South Lewisville to DFW Airport. Service on the line would interconnect to Denton and North Carrollton. This new segment would be approximately seven miles long and would be coordinated with DFW Airport s rail access plans on the northwest side of the Airport. If DART develops the Cotton Belt Railroad alignment from Downtown Carrollton to DFW Airport, and DCTA rail serves the Carrollton Intermodal Transportation Center, this alternative would likely be unnecessary. Lewisville to Richardson (KCS railroad right-of-way) and Carrollton to The Colony/Frisco (BNSF railroad right-of-way) Future rail service to the east side of Denton County will depend in part on the development of these two corridors. This will be one of the better opportunities to partner with neighboring counties or authorities to accelerate funding and development of services. Carrollton to Dallas (same seat service) This future segment will be explored at a time when technology is available to provide same-seat service from Denton to downtown Dallas. Denton to Fort Worth There are two possible alignments to serve this corridor between Denton and Fort Worth. The primary option is to use the UP railroad right-of-way that runs parallel to US-377. However, an alternative could use the I-35W right-of-way. The exact alignment would be determined in a future alternatives analysis process. Other Expansion Alternatives Denton to McKinney (US 380 right-of-way) Lewisville to The Colony/Frisco/McKinney (SH 121 right-of-way) South County Line through Justin, Ponder, Krum, and Sanger (BNSF railroad right-of-way) Denton to Aubrey/Pilot Point (UP railroad right-of-way) Remaining Kansas City Southern line northwest of Denton (KCS railroad right-of-way) 8

13 FIGURE 2: REGIONAL RAIL - LONGER-TERM EXPANSION ALTERNATIVES 9

14 Park-and-Ride/Regional Rail Facilities Regional Park-and-Ride/Regional Rail Facilities are recommended along the future regional rail service corridor (see Figure 3). The Park-and-Ride transfer network will also provide transfer points for all of the other recommended services. The three photos below demonstrate the range of options for Park-and-Ride from a shared lot at a regional shopping center, to a regional transit center with a covered waiting area, to a multi-level parking structure. Park-and-Ride facilities along the future rail corridors can be built to initially serve local and regional buses, but could later serve as Regional Rail Stations. If some Park-and-Ride locations can be shared with other commercial uses, those funds can go to help finance other transit related projects in the community. No specific locations have been identified or recommended at this time for these sites. Each individual community must work with the Authority and with local landowners to find a location that incorporates the Park-and-Ride facility into the adjacent area and provides convenient access for potential patrons. Land availability will be an important element in deciding where these facilities are placed in each community. The location of major Park-and-Rides, especially those that are also designated as potential rail stations, will be subject to an alternatives analysis process. The size assumptions used for the Park-and-Rides are for planning purposes only and will change as future studies are implemented. Regional Connector Bus Service Regional Connector Bus Service (see Figure 3) will focus on a cost-effective regional connection to the Carrollton Park-and-Ride and Dallas Central Business District (CBD). The Regional Connector Bus Service will rely heavily on Park-and-Ride lots along I-35E, as well as the transit hub in Denton. Headways for the Regional Connector Bus Service are recommended at 30- minutes during peak and 60-minutes during off-peak. Over-the-road coaches are recommended for the Regional Connector Bus Service component of the plan, and buses will be able to use the HOV/Bus Lanes on I-35E planned from Lewisville to Dallas. Prior to the initiation of the Regional Connector Bus route, DCTA will conduct surveys and research to confirm interest in establishing the service. Only those services that meet the needs of the customers and perform within the minimum productivity levels established by the DCTA Board will be implemented. Once implemented, service will be monitored, evaluated, and refined if necessary. The Regional Connector Bus Service is recommended as an interim measure in the I-35E corridor where rail service will eventually be implemented. It will be a service that can be quickly initiated to serve regional mobility needs. As rail service is introduced and expanded in the County, these routes may be discontinued or changed to provide additional feeder service into the rail lines. Opportunities for future Regional Connector Bus Service in other corridors was explored and routes for possible consideration by the DCTA Board are included in Figure 3. 10

15 FIGURE 3: REGIONAL CONNECTOR BUS SERVICE 11

16 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes DCTA also plans to work in partnership with the other regional transportation providers and the Texas Department of Transportation to promote development of high occupancy vehicle (HOV) facilities wherever possible. HOV lanes will allow regional connector buses to operate at increased reliability and at a time savings that should attract and maintain riders. The Regional Connector route into Dallas along I-35E may initially utilize the HOV lane from Carrollton to Dallas. Future TxDOT plans call for extension of the special lanes to FM 407. Local Fixed Route Bus Service Local fixed route bus service is to be provided within the cities of Denton and Lewisville (see Figure 4). The local routes will connect with the Regional Connector Bus Service. The City of Denton s LINK service will continue to operate, with possible additional routes to better serve the University of North Texas (UNT) and Texas Women s University (TWU). Local bus service is also recommended for Lewisville. The local routes were developed using 30-minute headways, consistent with the current LINK service. Small buses (20-30 passengers) are recommended for the Local Service. There will be a focus on new vehicle technology and alternative fuels. As with the Regional Connector Bus Service, DCTA will implement local services based on meeting the needs of the consumer and established productivity measures identified through surveys and research to determine demand and interest. The routes will be monitored, evaluated, and refined as necessary. Demand Response Service Demand response service is currently available for elderly and disabled residents of Denton County. The demand response service provided by DCTA in Denton and Lewisville will fulfill the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act complementary service for the fixed route services. DCTA will also provide demand response services throughout its Service Area to the elderly and disabled. The demand response service is made up of two zones (see Figure 5). Each zone will be served by up to three vans and will operate within the corporate limits of the cities in the Service Area. The Demand Response zones will provide on-call service to those individuals who are elderly or disabled. 12

17 FIGURE 4: LOCAL FIXED ROUTE BUS SERVICE 13

18 FIGURE 5: DEMAND RESPONSE SERVICE Coverage in the zones reflects the corporate boundaries of the cities and towns approving the sales and use tax in the election September 13,

19 Local Assistance/Corridor Preservation The plan recommends a level of Local Assistance funding for communities to help facilitate the public transportation system, in addition to funding for corridor preservation for the travel corridors. The funding level for the local assistance program is estimated to be $1 million to $1.5 million annually. The Local Assistance program will allow communities to enhance the public transportation system through: Roadway, intersection, and interchange improvements; Ramp metering; Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improvements; Ridesharing; HOV lanes on arterials and freeways in selected areas; Vanpools; Environmental mitigation; and Signalization upgrades. Enhanced Local Assistance Program (ELAP) Since it will be several years before rail service begins, opportunities exist to improve mobility in the short term. The plan recommends implementation of an Enhanced Local Assistance Program (ELAP). The ELAP is for eligible cities that approved a transit sales and use tax to facilitate their public transportation systems. It is intended to provide financial assistance for projects approved by DCTA for up to a maximum of four years, with specified limits. Funding for ELAP will be available to eligible cities in an amount generally equal to 25 percent of the DCTA sales and use tax collections from the respective city for the first four years of the authority s operation. The ELAP funds may become available in the quarter following the quarter in which the initial sales and use tax revenue is received by DCTA. Payments may be disbursed quarterly on a trailing basis. Payments will be made following compliance with project eligibility requirements. The eligible cities will submit project requests for DCTA approval. The ELAP program will be based on a similar model used by Dallas Area Rapid Transit with the specifics detailed in an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. 15

20 Short-Term Capital and Operating Costs Capital and operating costs have been developed for each of the recommended services for the first 10 years of services. Capital and annual transit operating costs are shown below. Note: This table does not include the costs of financing, which are addressed in the Financing Plan below. Proposed Element Capital Costs (1 st 10 years) Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs Regional Rail $240.0 million $4.3 million Park-and-Ride $7.25 million * Maintenance base/passenger amenities $10.0 million * Regional Connector Bus Service $2.1 million $0.6 million Local Bus $3.0 million $2.5 million Demand Response $1.0 million $1.3 million Local Assistance/Corridor Preservation $13.5 million N/A Enhanced LAP (4 years only) $ 15.4 million N/A Total $ million $ 8.7 million * Included in annual operating costs for each transit element Financing Plan In the planning effort, three alternative 25-year plans with varying sales and use tax rates were developed for consideration. The DCTA Board, wishing to implement rail services as quickly as possible, chose to request a minimum uniform sales and use tax of ½ percent. The ½ percent minimum uniform sales and use tax, in the three cities where the sales and use tax election was approved (Denton, Highland Village, and Lewisville) generates in the first-year approximately $14.6 million. Economic growth is also important in developing the financing plan for Denton County. Denton County has seen significant sales and use tax growth over the past few years (an increase of 5-8 percent annually from ). With the slowing of the economy in 2001 and 2002, it is assumed that this high growth rate in sales and use tax cannot be sustained. Therefore, the project team has used an annual sales and use tax growth rate of 2.5 percent, which only accounts for population growth and does not account for inflation. Several other factors may be important to the financial analysis and may contribute to the financial plan: Debt financing is projected to allow DCTA to accelerate the implementation of the rail project. Debt financing of $155 million is predicted using 30-year bonding, with a series of eight debt issuances in years one through eight of the overall plan. If 20-year bonding is used, there would be debt financing of $150 million, with a series of nine debt issuances in years one through nine. Federal funds are included in the financial plan in two ways. Formula funds (available to transit agencies based on population and ridership) are included at a growth rate of approximately 2.5 percent (below the inflation rate) over 25 years. In addition, federal New Starts funding for major transportation projects is included at approximately one-third the 16

21 cost of all rail components and bus vehicle acquisitions and major bus-related capital projects in the plan. The financial scenario developed for this Service Plan is conceptual and preliminary in nature using a range of assumptions that may vary once the overall plan is implemented. Sales and Use Tax Rate Chapter 460 of the Texas Transportation Code required that the Service Plan recommend a proposed sales and use tax rate. The statute states, The imposition of an authority s sales and use tax must be approved at an election and may not be imposed in an area that has not confirmed the authority. Wishing to implement rail services as expeditiously as possible, the DCTA Executive Committee on June 26, 2003, approved a minimum uniform sales and use tax rate of one-half percent and called an election on September 13, The transit sales and use tax election was approved by the cities of Denton, Highland Village, and Lewisville on September 13, Implementation of Service It is DCTA s objective to provide regional rail service connecting to the DART rail system as quickly as possible, opening some DCTA rail service concurrent with DART s LRT service in Carrollton. While the objective of the authority is to implement rail service as expeditiously as possible, a phased implementation schedule will be required. Services to Lewisville may begin two to three years before service to Denton. Implementation of fixed route bus service in Denton and Lewisville is planned to occur in Regional connector bus services are also anticipated to be initiated in , as well as demand response services for individuals who are elderly or disabled in Denton, Highland Village, and Lewisville. It is anticipated that the Local Assistance Program and Enhanced Local Assistance Program will be initiated in Cities approving a DCTA sales tax election subsequent to September 13, 2003, will receive service contingent upon future amendments to the Service Plan following any such election(s). DCTA may consider providing service through contractual arrangements to areas outside Denton, Highland Village, and Lewisville. 17

22 NEXT STEPS This document reflects the authority s Service Plan, refined to incorporate the results of the transit sales tax election of September 13, Efforts are now under way to implement the Plan using sales tax revenue and funding available from federal and state sources. The sales and use tax has an effective date of January 1, 2004, in each of the three cities approving the tax. Initial receipts are expected in March-April Detailed planning and implementation of the system has been initiated for both the rail and bus elements of the Plan. BACKGROUND TECHNICAL REPORT More detailed information on all aspects of the Service Plan is included in a separate document, Denton County Service Plan Technical Report, Revised 18

Denton County Transportation Authority Operating and Capital Budget As Adopted

Denton County Transportation Authority Operating and Capital Budget As Adopted Denton County Transportation Authority Fiscal Year October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006 2006 Operating and Capital Budget As Adopted August 25, 2005 John O. Hedrick Executive Director Transmittal

More information

DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 INTRODUCTORY SECTION Transmittal Letter GFOA Certificate of Achievement Organizational Chart List of Principal Officials FINANCIAL

More information

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 2 DALLAS & FORT WORTH Districts Transportation Code, 228.012 requires the Texas Department of Transportation (department) to create

More information

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012) TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012) Summary Description Proposed Project: Commuter Rail 37.6 Miles, 14 Stations (12 new, two existing) Total Capital Cost ($YOE):

More information

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 2 DALLAS & FORT WORTH Districts Transportation Code, 228.012 requires the Texas Department of Transportation (department) to create

More information

DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AS PREPARED BY: DCTA FINANCE DEPARTMENT LEWISVILLE, TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

More information

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 2 DALLAS & FORT WORTH Districts Transportation Code, 228.012 requires the Texas Department of Transportation (department) to create

More information

Denton County Transportation Authority

Denton County Transportation Authority The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the Denton County Transportation Authority for the annual budget

More information

DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 AS PREPARED BY DCTA FINANCE DEPARTMENT LEWISVILLE, TX DENTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 148

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 148 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW 2009-527 HOUSE BILL 148 AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A CONGESTION RELIEF AND INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION 21 ST CENTURY FUND; TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF

More information

2040 Transit System Plan

2040 Transit System Plan 2040 Transit System Plan City of Dallas Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee Briefing April 11, 2016 Agenda Background Plan Development Process Phase 1 - Comprehensive Operations Analysis

More information

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan #217752 1 Background Every four years, the Year 2035 Plan is reviewed Elements of review Validity of Plan Year 2035 forecasts Transportation

More information

DALLAS / FORT WORTH DISTRICT

DALLAS / FORT WORTH DISTRICT -2014 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT DALLAS / FORT WORTH DISTRICT - 2014 TIP 7-2010 2014 Transportation Improvement Program Chapter VI Public Transportation Services Within North

More information

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance This chapter examines the sources of funding for transportation investments in the coming years. It describes recent legislative actions that have changed the

More information

Dallas Area Rapid Transit Dallas, Texas. Financial Statements Years Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and Independent Auditor s Report

Dallas Area Rapid Transit Dallas, Texas. Financial Statements Years Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and Independent Auditor s Report Dallas Area Rapid Transit Dallas, Texas Financial Statements Years Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and Independent Auditor s Report DALLAS, TEXAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER

More information

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009

Public Hearing Tarrant County. April 14, 2009 Public Hearing Tarrant County April 14, 2009 Public Hearing Agenda Welcome and Project Overview Ms. Maribel P. Chavez, P.E. District Engineer Texas Department of Transportation Fort Worth District 2 Public

More information

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents the financial analysis conducted for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) selected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) for the.

More information

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0 UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary (Amounts in millions) District/Division//TMA Fiscal Year Adjusted Amount Post Public Meeting Adjustments Austin 3 SH 130 Concession FY $6,500,000 3 SH

More information

How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section

How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section Sa m pl e The project listing includes all projects for which Regional Transportation Council action will be requested during this Transportation

More information

Wake County. People love to be connected. In our cyberspace. transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY

Wake County. People love to be connected. In our cyberspace. transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY Wake County transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY People love to be connected. In our cyberspace driven world, people can stay connected pretty much all of the time. Connecting

More information

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY 11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program

More information

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the Berryessa Extension Project (BEP) Alternative and the Silicon Valley Rapid Transit

More information

Transportation Planning FAQ s

Transportation Planning FAQ s Transportation Planning FAQ s 1. What is the Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP)? The Master Thoroughfare Plan defines the network of existing and future roads deemed appropriate to accommodate the various

More information

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 SUBJECT City of Victoria Request for General Strategic Priorities Funding Application Support Johnson Street Bridge

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH70631-LBxz-401T (1/22) Short Title: Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH70631-LBxz-401T (1/22) Short Title: Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund. H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 HOUSE DRH0-LBxz-0T (/) D Short Title: Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representative. A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN

More information

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County 5/31/2012 The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. TRANSIT STEPS LEADING UP TO THIS PLAN 4 III. PLAN ELEMENTS 5 A.

More information

May 31, 2016 Financial Report

May 31, 2016 Financial Report 2016 May 31, 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 7/13/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORTS Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 6 - Operating Expenses

More information

ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 289, ,987 RESTRICTED ASSETS 146,836 31,045 PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET 1,960,410 1,632,326

ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 289, ,987 RESTRICTED ASSETS 146,836 31,045 PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET 1,960,410 1,632,326 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In Thousands) ASSETS 2000 1999 CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents $48,358 $95,394 Investments 51,187 38,488 Sales tax receivable 64,194 51,589 Transit revenue receivable,

More information

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process Glossary Administrative Committee This committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and provides general policy oversight that spans the multiple program responsibilities of the organization

More information

University Link LRT Extension

University Link LRT Extension (November 2007) The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, commonly known as Sound Transit, is proposing to implement an extension of the Central Link light rail transit (LRT) Initial Segment

More information

ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 303, ,236 RESTRICTED ASSETS 116, ,836 PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET 2,155,514 1,960,410

ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 303, ,236 RESTRICTED ASSETS 116, ,836 PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET 2,155,514 1,960,410 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In Thousands) ASSETS 2001 2000 CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $77,275 $48,358 Investments 53,568 51,187 Sales tax receivable 58,426 64,194 Transit revenue receivable,

More information

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

ALL Counties. ALL Districts TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation

More information

Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report

Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report North Central As of September 30, 2011 Texas Council of Governments NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL TOLL REVENUE FINANCIAL REPORT As of

More information

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview: State Fiscal Year

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview: State Fiscal Year February 1, 2017 Metropolitan Council Budget Overview: State Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Presentation to the Senate Transportation Finance and Policy Committee Transportation for a growing region 2 Regional

More information

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the BEP and the SVRTP. A summary evaluation of VTA s financial plan for the proposed

More information

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Discussion: In 1986, voters approved Measure B, a 1/2 cent sales tax, to fund transportation

More information

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...

More information

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis Alternatives Analysis Financial Feasibility Report November 30, 2006 Prepared for: City and County of Honolulu Prepared by: PB Consult Inc. Under Subcontract to: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.

More information

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 Contents Introduction 1 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Tel 210.227.8651 Fax 210.227.9321 825 S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 www.alamoareampo.org aampo@alamoareampo.org Pg.

More information

Funding Local Public Transportation

Funding Local Public Transportation Funding Local Public Transportation I. Metro A. SORTA, early history In 1969 the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority was established by Hamilton County with Hamilton County as its jurisdiction. In

More information

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda Northern Virginia s economic growth and global competitiveness are directly tied to the region s transit network. Transit

More information

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions INTRODUCTION This chapter documents the assumptions that were used to develop unit costs and revenue estimates for the

More information

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT made as of the 9 th day of June 2006 BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, in right of Alberta ( Alberta ), as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure and Transportation ( Minister

More information

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority October 2017 Financial Plan CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Sound Transit Financial Plan (October 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1

More information

Intercity Transit Community Update

Intercity Transit Community Update Intercity Transit Community Update Mission and Vision Mission: Our mission is to provide and promote transportation choices that support an accessible, sustainable, livable, healthy, prosperous community.

More information

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance 4.1 Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance 2040 4.2 CONTENTS Chapter 4: Transportation Finance Overview 4.3 Two Funding Scenarios 4.4 Current Revenue Scenario Assumptions 4.5 State Highway Revenues

More information

SAVE 25% on transit passes! EasyRide COMMUTER PROGRAM. See why you should get on board! FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

SAVE 25% on transit passes! EasyRide COMMUTER PROGRAM. See why you should get on board! FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAVE 25% on transit passes! EasyRide COMMUTER PROGRAM See why you should get on board! FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AUGUST 2017 EasyRide is the Fort Worth Transportation Authority (FWTA) commuter

More information

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section The project listing includes all projects for which Regional Transportation Council action will be requested during this Transportation Improvement

More information

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Chapter 6: Financial Resources Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation

More information

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES

TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES Public Meetings June 12 and 13, 2006 Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation Michael Burbank, AICP Principal Transportation Planner FOCUS

More information

POLICY BENEFITS OF MPO MERGER

POLICY BENEFITS OF MPO MERGER POLICY BENEFITS OF MPO MERGER 1. Creating larger Transportation Management Area Status 2. Moving to correct geographic perspective 3. Greater impact on Gross Domestic Product 4. Minimize equity concerns

More information

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary Transit Development Plan (FY 2019-2028) Executive Summary December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 System Profile... 2 Public Outreach... 4 Key Findings/Direction... 5 Implementation Plan... 6

More information

REPORT OF THE INTERMODAL COMMITTEE AND EXPLANATION OF CONGESTION RELIEF AND INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION 21 ST CENTURY FUND

REPORT OF THE INTERMODAL COMMITTEE AND EXPLANATION OF CONGESTION RELIEF AND INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION 21 ST CENTURY FUND REPORT OF THE INTERMODAL COMMITTEE AND EXPLANATION OF CONGESTION RELIEF AND INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION 21 ST CENTURY FUND The Intermodal Committee recommends legislation to: 1. Create the Congestion Relief

More information

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section The project listing includes all projects for which Regional Transportation Council action will be requested during this Transportation Improvement

More information

TSCC Budget Review TriMet

TSCC Budget Review TriMet TSCC Budget Review 2017-18 TriMet 1. Introduction to the District: The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (TriMet) boundary covers about 575 square miles of the urban portions of Multnomah,

More information

Dallas Area Rapid Transit. Financial Statements Years Ended September 30,2002 and 2007 and Independent Auditors Report

Dallas Area Rapid Transit. Financial Statements Years Ended September 30,2002 and 2007 and Independent Auditors Report Dallas Area Rapid Transit Financial Statements Years Ended September 30,2002 and 2007 and Independent Auditors Report Deloitte 8. Touche LLP Suite 1600 JPMorgan ChaseTower 2200 Ross Avenue Dallas,Texas

More information

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R99-14

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R99-14 SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R99-14 A RESOLUTION of the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority to reallocate $10 million (1995 dollars) from the East Everett Park and Ride Lot to the

More information

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Chapter 8 Financial Analysis 8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents a summary of the financial analysis for the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, a description of the Project Sponsor

More information

DRAFT REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM PLAN Regional Task Force July 8, 2011

DRAFT REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM PLAN Regional Task Force July 8, 2011 1 DRAFT REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM PLAN Regional Task Force July 8, 2011 AGENDA What is the role of the RTF? Public Involvement Update Technical Process Overview Draft Regional Transit System Plan (RTSP)

More information

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY Texas Transportation Commission September 26, 2018 Governor s Charge for Congestion Relief Initiative The State of Texas is spurring

More information

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing TESTIMONY The Texas Transportation Challenge Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing Ric Williamson Chairman Texas Transportation Commission April 19, 2006 Texas Department of

More information

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND. Update of Previous Planning Work. Plan Development Process. Public Involvement and Review Process

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND. Update of Previous Planning Work. Plan Development Process. Public Involvement and Review Process CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND What Is the 2030 TSP? Update of Previous Planning Work Plan Development Process Public Involvement and Review Process Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP) Chapter 2

More information

FY17 Budget Discussion

FY17 Budget Discussion FY17 Budget Discussion Metro is Everywhere Metro is a lot more than buses and trains. Anyone who has boarded a bus or a train, driven on the freeway, used the toll roads, stopped at a traffic signal, or

More information

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE Presentation for Texas Transportation Commission March 28, 2018 Purposes of the Workshop The Texas Transportation

More information

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade. Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding

More information

Arlington County, Virginia

Arlington County, Virginia Arlington County, Virginia METRO METRO 2015 2024 CIP Metro Funding Project Description The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA/Metro) is a unique federal-state-local partnership formed

More information

METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 15, :30 AM BRIEFING ITEMS

METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 15, :30 AM BRIEFING ITEMS METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 15, 2013 8:30 AM BRIEFING ITEMS 1. Service Outside of METRO Service Area K. Luhrsen BOARD BRIEFING SUMMARY SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #:

More information

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS Section 8 Financial Plan This final section of the TDP contains the financial information with regard to the improvements described in Section 7, Alternatives. The financial information is divided into

More information

February 2016 Financial Report

February 2016 Financial Report 2016 February 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 4/13/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORT Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 5 - Operating Expenses

More information

Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis Purple Line Functional Master Plan Advisory Group January 22, 2008 1 Purpose of Travel Forecasting Problem Definition Market Analysis Current Future

More information

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction 9.1 Introduction Chapter 9 This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the NEPA BART Extension Alternative. A summary of VTA s financial plan for the BART Extension Alternative is

More information

August 31, 2016 Financial Report

August 31, 2016 Financial Report August 31, 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 10/14/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORTS Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 6 - Operating Expenses

More information

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2007-2030 FINANCIAL PLAN Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER 2030 RTP Financial Plan WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

More information

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local 1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local government efforts to fund local transportation 4 projects that

More information

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Regarding the Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements (From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax County RFI Issuance Date: June 27, 2013 RFI Closing Date:

More information

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 2002 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Blank Page SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES CATEGORIES NUMBER, NAME AND YEAR ESTABLISHED PROGRAMMING AUTHORITY FUNDING BANK BALANCE (Yes/) RESPONSIBLE ENTITY RANKING INDEX OR ALLOCATION

More information

Transportation Funding

Transportation Funding Transportation Funding TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Background... 3 Current Transportation Funding... 4 Funding Sources... 4 Expenditures... 5 Case Studies... 6 Washington, D.C... 6 Chicago... 8

More information

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget 19 20 The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget The Oregon Department of Transportation was established in 1969 to provide a safe, efficient transportation system that supports economic opportunity

More information

April 30, 2016 Financial Report

April 30, 2016 Financial Report 2016 April 30, 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 6/15/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORT Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 6 - Operating Expenses

More information

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents Transportation Finance Overview Matt Burress House Research Department matt.burress@house.mn Andy Lee House Fiscal Analysis andrew.lee@house.mn January 5 th & 10 th, 2017 Presentation Contents 2 Part 1:

More information

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Prepared for: By: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 REVIEW OF FRED AND VRE EXISTING FUNDING SOURCES... 1 Federal Funding...

More information

The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County Revised: 9/27/2012 Adopted: 10/2/2012 The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. TRANSIT STEPS LEADING UP TO THIS PLAN 4 III.

More information

This chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).

This chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). 8 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). The alternative formerly known as

More information

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Single Audit Reports for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Audited Financial Statements Statement of

More information

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This

More information

Development of the Cost Feasible Plan

Development of the Cost Feasible Plan March 15, 2012 TPO Board and Advisory Committee Meetings Development of the Cost Feasible Plan Transportation Outlook 2035 LRTP Update Atkins Development of the Cost Feasible Plan P a g e 1 Development

More information

Regional Transit System Return on Investment Assessment. November 30, 2012

Regional Transit System Return on Investment Assessment. November 30, 2012 Regional Transit System Return on Investment Assessment November 30, 2012 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Itasca Project has a key goal to advance a comprehensive and aligned transportation system. As a stakeholder

More information

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities, Strategic Initiatives for 2008-2009 ODOT Action to Answer the Challenges of Today In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities, the Strategic Initiatives set forth by

More information

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Background Starting with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act of 1991, it has been a consistent requirement of federal law and regulation that the projects included

More information

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 C O N T E N T S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT... 1 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS... 3 Page BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Net Assets... 8 Statements

More information

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DRAFT MINUTES Thursday, October 23, :00 a.m. NWMC Offices 1616 East Golf Road Des Plaines, IL 60016

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DRAFT MINUTES Thursday, October 23, :00 a.m. NWMC Offices 1616 East Golf Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 Attachment A TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DRAFT MINUTES Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:00 a.m. NWMC Offices 1616 East Golf Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 Members Present: Ken Nelson, Co-Chair, Mayor, City of Rolling

More information

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016

Northern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016 Northern Virginia District State of the District Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016 Northern Virginia District Construction Performance Bill Cuttler, P.E. District Construction Engineer

More information

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction FY 2009-2018 Statewide Capital Investment Strategy.. asset management, performance-based strategic direction March 31, 2008 Governor Jon S. Corzine Commissioner Kris Kolluri Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE

More information

Fixed Guideway Transit Overview

Fixed Guideway Transit Overview Fixed Guideway Transit Overview March 13, 2017 House Ways and Means Committee Metropolitan Council Role in Transportation Planning 2 Serves as the region s federally required Metropolitan Planning Organization

More information

Parking Services and Transportation Planning

Parking Services and Transportation Planning Prepared for the Board of Governors April 10, 2014 Table of Contents PARKING SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING... 1 Background:... 2 Transportation Demand Management (TDM)... 2 Safety Initiatives:...

More information

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. OA.tE May 8, 2017

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. OA.tE May 8, 2017 Memorandum OA.tE May 8, 2017 a CITY OF DALLAS To Members of the Budget, Finance, & Audit Committee: Jennifer S. Gates (Chair), Philip T. Kingston (Vice Chair), Erik Wilson, Rickey D. Callahan, Scott Griggs,

More information

Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22,

Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22, Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan April 22, 2004 2-1 Executive Summary The Regional Transportation District (the District or RTD ), has developed a comprehensive $4.7 billion Plan,

More information

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND Appendix A TIGER IV Benefit Cost Analysis Minot International Airport Access Road Minot, ND Table of Contents Summary and Findings... 3 Net Economic Impacts to North Dakota... 4 Project Matrix... Error!

More information

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING CONTENTS Purpose... B1 Summary of Transportation Funding Sources... B1 Figure B-1: Average Annual Transportation Revenue Breakdown by Source (2011-2015)...B1

More information

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards;

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards; DIVISION 4.200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SECTION 4.201 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to tie the capital improvement needs identified in the other elements to

More information