Transcription

1 Page 1 of 11 General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: Docketed: 05/11/2011 Nature of Suit: 3410 Antitrust Termed: 02/14/2013 AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, et al Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco Fee Status: Paid Case Type Information: 1) civil 2) private 3) null Originating Court Information: District: : 3:09-cv SI Court Reporter: Belle Ball Court Reporter: Joan Marie Columbini Trial Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge Date Filed: 10/20/2009 Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA: 03/04/ /04/ /10/ /10/2011 Prior Cases: None Current Cases: None AT&T MOBILITY, LLC CROWELL & MORING LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC Crowell & Moring, LLP 40th Floor 515 South Flower Street Los Angeles, CA AT&T CORP.

2 Page 2 of 11 AT&T SERVICES, INC. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY AT&T OPERATIONS, INC.

3 Page 3 of 11 AT&T DATACOMM, INC. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC. CHI MEI CORPORATION CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION

4 Page 4 of 11 CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC. CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC., "Nexgen" NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC. CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD. TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. Patrick J. Ahern, Attorney Direct: BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP One Prudential Plaza East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL Patrick J. Ahern, Attorney Direct: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION Terminated: 11/29/2012 EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. Terminated: 11/29/2012 HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION Robert E. Freitas Direct: Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 200 Redwood City, CA Jason S. Angell, Attorney Direct: Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP 100 Marine Parkway Suite 200 Redwood City, CA LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

5 Page 5 of 11 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. SHARP CORPORATION Terminated: 02/14/2013 TOSHIBA CORPORATION TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC. TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Terminated: 02/14/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Amicus Curiae, Emilio E. Varanini, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General Direct: [COR LD NTC Dep State Aty Gen] AGCA - OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL 11th Floor 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA

6 Page 6 of 11 AT&T MOBILITY LLC; AT&T CORP.; AT&T SERVICES, INC.; BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; AT&T OPERATIONS, INC.; AT&T DATACOMM, INC.; SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, v. Plaintiffs - Appellants, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC; CHI MEI CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; CMO JAPAN CO., LTD.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC., "Nexgen"; NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC.; CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.; TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.; EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION; LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.; LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SHARP CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.; TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants - Appellees.

7 Page 7 of 11 05/10/ Filed order (PAMELA ANN RYMER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) The motion for leave to file a reply to the answer to this petition is granted. The petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 USC 1292(b) is granted. Within 14 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with FRAP 5(d). [ ] [ ] (GR) 05/11/ pg, 594 KB 05/18/ pg, KB DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant AT&T Corp., Appellant AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Appellant AT&T Mobility LLC, Appellant AT&T Operations, Inc., Appellant AT&T Services, Inc., Appellant Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Appellant Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on 05/10/2011. Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/18/2011. Transcript ordered by 06/09/2011. Transcript due 07/11/2011. Appellant AT&T Corp., Appellant AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Appellant AT&T Mobility LLC, Appellant AT&T Operations, Inc., Appellant AT&T Services, Inc., Appellant Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Appellant Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company opening brief due 08/18/2011. Appellee AU Optronics Corporation, Appellee Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Appellee CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Appellee Chi Mei Corporation, Appellee Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Appellee Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Appellee Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Appellee Epson Electronics America, Inc., Appellee Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation, Appellee LG Display America, Inc., Appellee LG Display Co., Ltd., Appellee Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Appellee Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Appellee Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Appellee Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Appellee Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Appellee Sharp Corporation, Appellee Sharp Electronics Corporation, Appellee Tatung Company of America, Inc., Appellee Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Appellee Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Appellee Toshiba Corporation and Appellee Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. answering brief due 09/19/2011. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [ ] (GR) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/18/2011. [ ] (JAM) 05/20/ Fee status changed ( [Case Number : pd] ). [ ] (RS) 05/25/ pg, KB Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): Case not selected for mediation program. Counsel interested in obtaining settlement assistance or program information should contact the Mediation Office. [ ] (KKW) 08/10/ day oral extension by phone of time to file the opening brief for Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company is granted. Appellants' opening brief due 09/01/2011. The answering briefs are due due 10/03/2011. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [ ] [ ] (AT) 08/10/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ethan P. Schulman for Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Date of service: 08/10/2011. [ ] (EPS) 08/10/ Added attorney Ethan P. Schulman for Pacific Bell Telephone Company AT&T Services, Inc. AT&T Mobility LLC Southwestern Bell Telephone Company AT&T Operations, Inc. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. AT&T Datacomm, Inc. AT&T Corp., in case [ ] (MT) 08/11/ pg, KB 09/01/ pg, 1.47 MB Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Correspondence: Re: Court Granting Request to File Opening Brief on September 1, Date of service: 08/11/2011 [ ] (EPS) Received Appellants' notification of filing under seal opening brief and Vol. 4 of excerpts of record, with DC protective orders attached. [ ] (LA) 09/01/ Filed UNDER SEAL original and 7 copies of Appellants' (Informal: No) opening brief of 37 pages. Four copies Excerpts of record in 4 volumes (Vol. 4 FILED UNDER SEAL). Served on 09/01/2011. [ ] --[Edited: Sealed brief and sent NDA. 09/07/2011 by RY] (LA) 09/08/ pg, KB Submitted (ECF) Amicus Brief for review (by government or with consent per FRAP 29(a). Submitted by The State of California. Date of service: 09/08/2011. [ ] --[COURT UPDATE: Replaced PDF of brief (to correct certificate of compliance). Edited docket text to reflect the content of the filing. Resent NDA. 09/09/2011 by DB] (EEV) 09/09/ Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae State of California. [ ] (LA) 09/09/ pg, KB Filed clerk order: The amicus brief [12] submitted by State of California is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a green cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [ ] (LA)

8 Page 8 of 11 09/12/ Received 7 paper copies of Amicus brief [12] filed by State of California. [ ] (DB) 09/15/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation notice of joint brief (Answering). Date of service: 09/15/2011. [ ] (RST) 09/15/ Filed notice of joint brief by Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. due 10/24/2011. Five additional pages are authorized or 1400 words. Optional reply brief due 14 days after date of service of answering brief.. --[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect correct listing of parties. Resent NDA. 09/15/2011 by DB] [ ] (MT) 10/24/ pg, KB Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellees by Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd.. Date of service: 10/24/2011. [ ]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect correct party filers. Resent NDA. 10/24/2011 by RY] (RST) 10/24/ Filed Appellees' Supplemental Excerpts of Record in 1 volume. Served on 10/24/11 [ ] (GV) 10/25/ pg, KB Filed clerk order: The Joint Answering brief [18] submitted by Appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a red cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [ ] (GV) 10/26/ Received 7 paper copies of Joint Answering brief [18] filed by Appellees. [ ] (SD) 11/02/ Oral extension by phone of time to file optional reply brief. Appellants reply brief due November 25, [ ] (TH) 11/02/ pg, KB 11/22/ pg, KB 11/22/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Correspondence: Appellants' 14-Day Extention to File Reply Brief Granted. Date of service: 11/02/2011 [ ] (EPS) Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review. Submitted by Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Date of service: 11/22/2011. [ ] (EPS) Filed clerk order: The reply brief [24] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a gray cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [ ] (RH) 11/29/ Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [24] filed by Appellants. [ ] (SD) 02/14/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher M. Lynch for Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd.. Date of service: 02/14/2012. [ ] (CML) 02/14/ Added attorney Christopher Marisak Lynch for LG Display Co., Ltd. LG Display America, Inc., in case [ ] (MT) 02/14/ pg, KB 02/14/ pg, KB 03/12/ pg, 30.7 KB Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Correspondence: Certificate of Service re Notice of Appearance of Counsel. Date of service: 02/14/2012 [ ] (CML) Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Motion for 46-5 exemption. Date of service: 02/14/2012. [ ] (CML) Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) Appellees LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc., have filed a motion for exemption from Ninth Circuit Rule 46-5 for counsel Christopher M. Lynch, Esq. The motion is granted as to pending appeal No and denied as moot as to the following petitions and closed appeals: Nos ; ; ; and The court declines to entertain this motion in case Nos , , and because LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. are not parties in those cases. Briefing is complete in appeal No (MOATT) [ ] [ , , , , ] (KKW)

9 Page 9 of 11 08/10/ Added attorney Derek Foran, Melvin R. Goldman, Stephen P. Freccero for Epson Imaging Devices Corporation Epson Electronics America, Inc., in case [ ] (HH) 08/10/ Added attorney Christopher Hockett for Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. Chi Mei Corporation CMO Japan Co., Ltd. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., in case [ ] (HH) 08/10/ Added attorney Carl L. Blumenstein, Christopher A. Nedeau for Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc AU Optronics Corporation, in case [ ] (HH) 09/10/ pg, KB 09/13/ pg, KB 09/14/ pg, KB 09/28/ pg, KB Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, November 9, :30 AM - Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor - James R. Browning US Courthouse - San Francisco, California. Please return ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. Please open attached documents to view details about your case. [ ] (RB) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Richard S. Taffet for Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation. [ ] (RST) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Ethan P. Schulman, Esquire for Appellants Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Operations, Inc.. [ ] (EPS) Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Harrison J. Frahn IV for Appellees CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.. Date of service: 09/28/2012. [ ] (HF) 09/28/ Attorneys Christopher Hocket substituted by Attorney Harrison Frahn,in [ ] (MT) 10/02/ pg, KB 10/03/ pg, KB 10/12/ pg, KB 10/12/ pg, KB 10/23/ pg, 1.66 MB 10/26/ pg, KB 10/31/ pg, KB 10/31/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Amicus Curiae State of California Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for Leave of Amicus Curiae The State of California to Participate in Oral Argument]. Date of service: 10/02/2012. [ ] (EEV) Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KKW): Amicus curiae the State of California s motion to participate in oral argument is hereby GRANTED. Fed. R. App. P. 39(g). The State is allocated five of the fifteen minutes of oral argument time allotted to the Plaintiff-Appellants, unless Plaintiff-Appellants and the State agree between themselves on a different allocation of their oral argument time, and so inform the court at the commencement of oral argument. [ ] (KKW) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 10/12/2012. [ ] (EPS) Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation Motion to take judicial notice of, Motion to supplement record on appeal. Date of service: 10/12/2012. [ ] (RST) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Motion to take judicial notice of, Motion to file supplemental excerpts of record. Date of service: 10/23/2012. [ ] (EPS) Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation response to motion (,motion to take judicial notice,motion to file supplemental excerpts of record). Date of service: 10/26/2012. [ ] (RST) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Emilio E. Varanini, Esquire for Amicus Curiae State of California. [ ] (EEV) Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Emilio E. Varanini, Esquire for Amicus Curiae State of California. [ ] (EEV) 11/09/ ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY. [ ] (ER) 11/28/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert E. Freitas Jason S. Angell for Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation. Date of service: 11/28/2012. [ ] (REF) 11/28/ Added attorney Robert E. Freitas for Hannstar Display Corporation, in case [ ] (MT) 11/28/ Added attorney Jason S. Angell for Hannstar Display Corporation, in case [ ] (MT) 11/29/ pg, KB 11/29/2012 Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 11/29/2012. [ ] (EPS)

10 Page 10 of pg, KB Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) The parties Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal as to Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. (D.E. 52) is GRANTED. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice with respect to those two Appellees only. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney s fees on appeal, pursuant to their stipulation. This order serves as the mandate as to the named parties. [ ] (KKW) 11/29/ Terminated Appellees Epson Electronics America, Inc. and Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in [ ] (KKW) 01/09/ pg, KB 01/22/ pg, KB 01/24/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Appellees Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation Stipulated Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 01/09/2013. [ ] (RST) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Stipulated Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 01/22/2013. [ ] (EPS) Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) The parties Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal as to LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation); Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (D.E. 56) is GRANTED. [ ] (KKW) 01/24/ Terminated Appellees AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. in [ ] (KKW) 02/14/ pg, KB 02/14/ pg, KB 02/14/ pg, KB 02/26/ pg, KB 03/11/ pg, KB Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) The parties Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal as to Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation only (D.E. 55) is GRANTED. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal, pursuant to their stipulation. This order shall serve as the mandate of the court as to Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation. [ ] (RP) Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY)Appellees Motion to Take Judicial Notice and Supplement Record on Appeal (D.E. 43) is DENIED. Appellants Motion to Take Judicial Notice and Supplement Record on Appeal (D.E. 44) is DENIED. [ ] (RP) FILED OPINION (RONALD M. GOULD, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY) REVERSED AND REMANDED. Judge: MDS Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [ ] (RP) Filed (ECF) Appellants AT&T Corp., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T Operations, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of USD. Date of service: 02/26/2013 [ ] (EPS) MANDATE ISSUED.(RMG, MDS and KTD) Costs taxed against Appellee in the amount of $ [ ] (EL)

11 Page 11 of 11 Clear All Documents and Docket Summary Documents Only Include Page Numbers Selected Pages: 0 Selected Size: 0 KB View Selected