Docket

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Docket"

Transcription

1 1 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: Docketed: 11/25/2013 Nature of Suit: 3410 Antitrust Termed: 01/07/2016 In re: Best Buy Co., Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco Fee Status: Paid Case Type Information: 1) civil 2) private 3) null Originating Court Information: District: : 3:10-cv SI Court Reporter: Belle Ball Court Reporter: Connie McCarthy Kuhl Trial Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge Date Filed: 10/08/2010 Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA: 11/20/ /20/ /22/ /22/2013 Lead: 3:07-md SI Prior Cases: None Current Cases: Consolidated Cross-Appeal Related Lead Member Start End /07/ /23/ /18/ /27/ /10/ /18/ /27/ /27/ /10/ /21/ /09/ /01/ /21/ /21/ /09/ /01/2016 In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION BEST BUY CO., INC. Plaintiff - Appellee, Roman M. Silberfeld Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Suite Century Park East Los Angeles, CA Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik, Attorney Robins Kaplan LLP 800 Lasalle Avenue 2800 Lasalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN Lisa L. Beane, Attorney Direct:

2 2 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM Robins Kaplan LLP 800 Lasalle Avenue 2800 Lasalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN Bernice Conn, Esquire, Attorney Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Suite Century Park East Los Angeles, CA Michael A. Geibelson, Attorney Robins Kaplan LLP 800 Lasalle Avenue 2800 Lasalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN Eric John Magnuson Direct: [NTC Retained] Robins Kaplan LLP 800 Lasalle Avenue 2800 Lasalle Plaza Minneapolis, MN David Martinez, Attorney Robins Kaplan LLP 2049 Century Park East Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA BEST BUY PURCHASING, LLC Plaintiff - Appellee, Roman M. Silberfeld Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik, Attorney Lisa L. Beane, Attorney Direct: Bernice Conn, Esquire, Attorney Michael A. Geibelson, Attorney Eric John Magnuson Direct: [NTC Retained] David Martinez, Attorney

3 3 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICE, INC. Plaintiff - Appellee, Roman M. Silberfeld Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik, Attorney Lisa L. Beane, Attorney Direct: Bernice Conn, Esquire, Attorney Michael A. Geibelson, Attorney Eric John Magnuson Direct: [NTC Retained] David Martinez, Attorney BEST BUY STORES, L.P. Plaintiff - Appellee, Roman M. Silberfeld Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik, Attorney Lisa L. Beane, Attorney Direct: Bernice Conn, Esquire, Attorney Michael A. Geibelson, Attorney Eric John Magnuson Direct: [NTC Retained] David Martinez, Attorney

4 4 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM MAGNOLIA HI-FI, INC. Plaintiff - Appellee, Roman M. Silberfeld Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik, Attorney Lisa L. Beane, Attorney Direct: Bernice Conn, Esquire, Attorney Michael A. Geibelson, Attorney Eric John Magnuson Direct: [NTC Retained] David Martinez, Attorney BESTBUY.COM, LLC Plaintiff - Appellee, Roman M. Silberfeld Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik, Attorney Lisa L. Beane, Attorney Direct: Bernice Conn, Esquire, Attorney Michael A. Geibelson, Attorney Eric John Magnuson Direct: [NTC Retained] David Martinez, Attorney

5 5 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION Defendant, HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION Defendant - Appellant, Belinda S. Lee Direct: Latham & Watkins LLP Suite 2000 Firm: Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA J. Scott Ballenger Direct: Latham & Watkins LLP Suite Eleventh Street, NW Washington, DC Aaron Tuen Fai Chiu, Attorney Direct: Latham & Watkins LLP Suite # 2000 Firm: Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA Daniel Murray Wall, Esquire, Attorney Direct: Latham & Watkins LLP Suite 2000 Firm: Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA

6 6 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY PURCHASING, LLC; BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICE, INC.; BEST BUY STORES, L.P.; MAGNOLIA HI-FI, INC.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC, v. Plaintiffs - Appellees, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, and Defendant, HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellant.

7 7 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM 11/25/ pg, KB DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation on 11/22/2013. Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/02/2013. Transcript ordered by 12/23/2013. Transcript due 01/21/2014. Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation opening brief due 03/03/2014. Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. answering brief due 04/01/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [ ] (HH) [Entered: 11/25/ :04 AM] 11/25/ Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD Date paid: 11/25/2013. [ ] (HH) [Entered: 11/25/ :07 PM] 12/02/ pg, 93.4 KB 12/02/ pg, KB 12/23/ pg, KB 12/30/ pg, KB 12/30/ pg, KB 01/06/ pg, KB 01/23/ pg, KB 05/22/ pg, KB 06/16/ pg, KB 06/20/ pg, KB 06/30/ pg, KB 07/30/ pg, KB 08/05/ pg, 31.9 KB Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/02/2013. [ ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 12/02/ :05 PM] Filed (ECF) Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/02/2013. [ ] (Geibelson, Michael) [Entered: 12/02/ :49 PM] DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting crossappeal briefing schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/30/2013. First cross appeal brief due 03/03/2014 for Hannstar Display Corporation. Second brief on cross appeal due 04/01/2014 for Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC, Hannstar Display Corporation and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.. Third brief on cross appeal due 05/02/2014 for Hannstar Display Corporation. Optional cross appeal reply brief for Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. is due within 14 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [ ] [ , ] (RT) [Entered: 12/23/ :23 PM] Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/30/2013. [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 12/30/ :31 AM] Filed (ECF) Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/30/2013. [ ] [ , ] (Conn, Bernice) [Entered: 12/30/ :38 PM] MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - The court has scheduled a telephone Assessment Conference, 01/21/2014, 1:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time... The Circuit Mediator will initiate the conference call by contacting each person on the attached list. Please be available for the call at least five minutes before the scheduled time. Counsel should review the attached list and inform the Mediation Assistant by at least 72 hours in advance of the scheduled call of any corrections to the list... [ ] [ , ] (BS) [Entered: 01/06/ :51 PM] Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): The briefing schedule previously set by the court for these cross-appeals is vacated. Counsel for Hannstar shall notify the Circuit Mediator by , with a copy served on counsel for Best Buy, within five days of the district court s filing a decision on the pending motion for attorney s fees and costs. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further discussions prior to the ruling by the district court on the pending motion. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [ ] [ , ] (AF) [Entered: 01/23/ :01 AM] MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Further Conference, 06/13/2014, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time, (w/ ). [ ] [ , ] (BS) [Entered: 05/22/ :01 PM] MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Further Conference, 06/20/2014, 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time (w/ ). [ ] [ , ] (BS) [Entered: 06/16/ :18 PM] MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - Further Conference, 06/27/2014, 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 06/20/2014 ). [ ] [ , ] (BS) [Entered: 06/20/ :45 PM] MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Further Conference, 07/21/2014, 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time, (with , , ). [ ] [ , , , ] (BS) [Entered: 06/30/ :16 PM] ENTRY UPDATED. Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): The court will initiate a further conference by telephone on September 3, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further discussions prior to the next scheduled conference. (COURT UPDATE: To reflect the initials of the deputy clerk) [ ] [ , , , ] (OC) [Entered: 07/30/ :37 PM] Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): The briefing schedule previously set for cross-appeal nos and is vacated. [ ] [ , , , ] (AF) [Entered: 08/05/ :50 PM]

8 8 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM 09/11/ pg, KB Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): The briefing schedule for cross-appeal nos and is reset as follows: the first cross-appeal brief by appellant/cross-appellee Hannstar Display Corporation ( Hannstar ) is due November 17, 2014; the second crossappeal brief by appellees/cross-appellants Best Buy Company, Inc., et al. ( Best Buy ) is due February 2, 2015; the third cross-appeal brief by Hannstar is due April 3, 2015; the optional cross-appeal reply brief by Best Buy is due May 4, The briefing schedule for cross-appeal nos and is reset as follows: the first cross-appeal brief by appellants/cross-appellees Best Buy is due February 9, 2015; the second cross-appeal brief by appellee/cross-appellant Hannstar is due April 10, 2015; the third cross-appeal brief by Best Buy is due June 12, 2015; the optional cross-appeal reply brief by Hannstar is due July 13, [ ] [ , , , ] (AF) [Entered: 09/11/ :32 AM] 11/10/ Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file First Brief on Cross-Appeal by Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in New requested due date is 12/17/2014. [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 11/10/ :40 AM] 11/10/ Streamlined request [17] by Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: First cross appeal brief due 12/17/2014 for Hannstar Display Corporation. Second brief on cross appeal due 03/02/2015 for Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P. and Bestbuy.com, LLC. Third brief on cross appeal due 05/04/2015 for Hannstar Display Corporation. Optional cross appeal reply brief due 06/04/2015 for Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P. and Bestbuy.com, LLC. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [ ] [ , ] (LN) [Entered: 11/10/ :48 AM] 11/19/ pg, KB 11/19/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Katherine S. Barrett Wiik for Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in Date of service: 11/19/2014. [ ] [ , ] (Barrett Wiik, Katherine) [Entered: 11/19/ :47 PM] Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Eric J. Magnuson for Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in Date of service: 11/19/2014. [ ] [ , ] (Magnuson, Eric) [Entered: 11/19/ :52 PM] 11/19/ Added attorneys Eric John Magnuson and Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik for Best Buy Stores, L.P., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Co., Inc., Bestbuy.com, LLC, Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc., and Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., in case and case [ ] [ , ] (KB) [Entered: 11/19/ :50 PM] 12/17/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Aaron T. Chiu for Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Date of service: 12/17/2014. [ ] [ , ] (Chiu, Aaron) [Entered: 12/17/ :14 PM] 12/17/ pg, MB Submitted (ECF) First Brief on Cross-Appeal and excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Date of service: 12/17/2014. [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 12/17/ :19 PM] 12/18/ Added attorney Aaron Tuen Fai Chiu for Hannstar Display Corporation, in case and case [ ] [ , ] (KB) [Entered: 12/18/ :47 AM] 12/18/ pg, KB 12/18/ pg, KB Filed clerk order: The first brief on cross-appeal [23] submitted by Hannstar Display Corporation is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [23] submitted by Hannstar Display Corporation in Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule [ ] [ , ] (WWP) [Entered: 12/18/ :48 PM] Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of J. Scott Ballenger for Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Date of service: 12/18/2014. [ ] [ , ] (Ballenger, J.) [Entered: 12/18/ :12 PM] 12/18/ Added attorney J. Scott Ballenger for Hannstar Display Corporation [ ] [ , ] (JFF) [Entered: 12/18/ :07 PM] 12/19/ Filed Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation paper copies of excerpts of record [23] in 5 volume(s). [ ] [ , ] (WWP) [Entered: 12/22/ :47 AM]

9 9 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM 12/19/ Received 7 paper copies of First Brief on Cross-Appeal [23] filed by Hannstar Display Corporation. [ ] [ , ] (SD) [Entered: 12/22/ :00 AM] 12/29/ pg, KB 01/16/ pg, KB 02/02/ pg, KB Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): These appeals are not selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding these appeals, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk s office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions while the appeals are pending. [ ] [ , , , ] (SML) [Entered: 12/29/ :26 AM] Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 01/16/2015. [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 01/16/ :40 PM] Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lisa L. Beane for Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in Date of service: 02/02/2015. [ ] [ , ] (Beane, Lisa) [Entered: 02/02/ :22 PM] 02/02/ Added attorney Lisa L. Beane for Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., and Bestbuy.com, LLC, in case and case [ ] [ , ] (KB) [Entered: 02/02/ :35 PM] 03/02/ pg, 7.44 MB 03/02/ pg, KB Submitted (ECF) Second Brief on Cross-Appeal and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in Date of service: 03/02/2015. [ ] [ , ] (Barrett Wiik, Katherine) [Entered: 03/02/ :46 PM] Filed clerk order: The second brief on cross-appeal [34] submitted by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [34] submitted by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule [ ] [ , ] (WWP) [Entered: 03/02/ :57 PM] 03/05/ Received 7 paper copies of second brief on cross appeal [34] filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. [ ] [ , ] (SD) [Entered: 03/05/ :32 PM] 03/05/ Filed Appellee Best Buy Co., Inc. paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [34] in 2 volume(s). [ ] [ , ] (WWP) [Entered: 03/06/ :32 AM] 05/04/ pg, KB 05/05/ pg, KB Submitted (ECF) Third Brief on Cross-Appeal for review. Submitted by Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Date of service: 05/04/2015. [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 05/04/ :28 PM] Filed clerk order: The third brief on cross-appeal [38] submitted by Hannstar Display Corporation is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: yellow. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [ ] [ , ] (WWP) [Entered: 05/05/ :41 AM] 05/05/ Received 7 paper copies of Third Brief on Cross-Appeal [38] filed by Hannstar Display Corporation. [ ] [ , ] (SD) [Entered: 05/06/ :26 AM] 06/03/ pg, KB 06/04/ pg, 31.5 KB 06/04/ pg, KB Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): The remainder of the briefing schedule for these cross-appeals is revised as follows: the third cross-appeal brief by appellant/cross-appellee Hannstar Display Corporation is due July 1, 2015; the optional cross-appeal reply brief by appellee/cross-appellant Best Buy Company, Inc. is due August 7, [ ] [ , ] (SML) [Entered: 06/03/ :32 AM] Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): The court s order filed June 3, 2015, is vacated. [ ] [ , ] (SML) [Entered: 06/04/ :50 AM] Submitted (ECF) Cross-Appeal Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in Date of service: 06/04/2015. [ ] [ , ] (Barrett Wiik, Katherine) [Entered: 06/04/2015

10 10 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM 10:03 AM] 06/04/ pg, KB Filed clerk order: The cross-appeal reply brief [43] submitted by Best Buy Co., et al, is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [ ] [ , ] (WWP) [Entered: 06/04/ :04 AM] 06/08/ Received 7 paper copies of Cross-Appeal Reply Brief [43] filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. [ ] [ , ] (SD) [Entered: 06/08/ :26 PM] 09/29/ Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, December 11, :00 A.M. - Courtroom 2 - James R Browning US Cthse, 95 7th St, San Francisco, CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here. When you have reviewed the calendar, download the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form, complete the form, and file it via Appellate ECF or return the completed form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. [ ] [ , ] (GEV) [Entered: 09/29/ :40 PM] 09/30/ pg, KB 10/06/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Ms. Belinda S. Lee for Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Attorney Ms. Belinda S. Lee for Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 09/30/ :37 PM] Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Ms. Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik for Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Attorney Ms. Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik for Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. and Bestbuy.com, LLC in [ ] [ , ] (Barrett Wiik, Katherine) [Entered: 10/06/ :43 AM] 11/18/ REVISED: Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, December 11, :30 A.M. - Courtroom 2 - San Francisco CA. **NOTE: Start time changed.** View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here. When you have reviewed the calendar, download the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form, complete the form, and file it via Appellate ECF or return the completed form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. [ ] [ , ] (GEV) [Entered: 11/18/ :11 AM] 11/19/ pg, KB 11/24/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Ms. Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik for Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. in , Attorney Ms. Katherine Susan Barrett Wiik for Appellants Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. and Bestbuy.com, LLC in [ ] [ , ] (Barrett Wiik, Katherine) [Entered: 11/19/ :13 PM] Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Ms. Belinda S. Lee for Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Attorney Ms. Belinda S. Lee for Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in [ ] [ , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 11/24/ :48 AM] 12/11/ ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO Judges SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and ROSEMARY MARQUEZ. [ ] [ , ] (AT) [Entered: 12/11/ :50 AM] 12/11/ pg, KB Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Correspondence: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel Joanna Rosen Forster. Date of service: 12/11/2015 [ ] [ , ] (Forster, Joanna) [Entered: 12/11/ :38 PM] 12/14/ Terminated Joanna Rosen Forster for Hannstar Display Corporation in and Hannstar Display Corporation in [ ] [ , ] (KB) [Entered: 12/14/ :07 AM] 01/07/ pg, KB 01/14/ pg, 18.1 KB FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and ROSEMARY MARQUEZ) We consolidate Appeals No , , and for purposes of disposition. AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [ ] [ , , ] (RMM) [Entered: 01/07/ :20 AM] Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in , Joint Motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing until 02/22/2016. Date of service: 01/14/2016. [ ] [ , , ] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 01/14/ :08 PM]

11 11 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM 01/14/ pg, KB 02/22/ pg, KB 03/17/ pg, KB 03/28/ pg, KB 03/31/ pg, KB 04/25/ pg, KB 05/27/ pg, KB Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and ROSEMARY MARQUEZ): The parties joint motion for an extension of time to February 22, 2016 within which to file a petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. [ ] [ , , ] (AF) [Entered: 01/14/ :43 PM] Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (from 01/07/2016 memorandum). Date of service: 02/22/2016. [ ] [ , ] --[COURT UPDATE: Attached correct PDF of memorandum. 02/24/2016 by TYL] (Lee, Belinda) [Entered: 02/22/ :28 PM] Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and ROSEMARY MARQUEZ): The panel has voted to deny HannStar s petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Wardlaw have voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Márquez has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Thus, the petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. IT IS SO ORDERED. [ ] [ , ] (AF) [Entered: 03/17/ :31 AM] MANDATE ISSUED.(SPG, KMW and RM) [ ] [ , , ] (CW) [Entered: 03/28/ :12 AM] Filed (ECF) Appellees Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, LLC and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. Motion for attorney fees in the amount of 182, Date of service: 03/31/2016. [ ] [ ]--[COURT UPDATE: Spread docket text to cross-appeal /22/2016 by LA] (Barrett Wiik, Katherine) [Entered: 03/31/ :37 PM] Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MH): The unopposed motion for attorneys fees is granted. See 15 U.S.C. 15; 9th Cir. Gen. Orders App. A, Para. 50. Attorneys fees in the amount of $182, are awarded in favor of Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing, LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Service, Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P., Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.; and BestBuy.com, LLC, and against HannStar Display Corporation. This order amends the court s mandate. [ ] [ , ] (DJV) [Entered: 04/25/ :04 AM] Filed (ECF) Appellant Hannstar Display Corporation in , Appellee Hannstar Display Corporation in Correspondence: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. Date of service: 05/27/2016 [ ] [ , ] (Ho, Yi-Chin) [Entered: 05/27/ :52 AM] 05/31/ Terminated Yi-Chin Ho for Hannstar Display Corporation in and Hannstar Display Corporation in [ ] [ , ] (CW) [Entered: 05/31/ :47 AM]

12 12 of 12 7/9/2016 7:14 AM Documents and Docket Summary Documents Only Include Page Numbers Selected Pages: Selected Size:

Page 1 of 11 General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-16188 Docketed: 05/11/2011 Nature of Suit: 3410 Antitrust Termed: 02/14/2013 AT&T Mobility

More information

https://ecf.ca7.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/transportroom

https://ecf.ca7.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/transportroom Page 1 of 10 General Docket Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-1109 Docketed: 01/17/2012 Nature of Suit: 3890 Other Statutory Actions Termed: 06/25/2013 Ohio Chemical Services,

More information

https://ecf.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/transportroom

https://ecf.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/transportroom Page 1 of 6 General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-2053 Docketed: 09/14/2011 Nature of Suit: 4370 Other Fraud Termed: 05/04/2012 Liu v. Amerco,

More information

CA NOS , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CA NOS , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 10-50219, 03/05/2015, ID: 9446955, DktEntry: 93, Page 1 of 9 CA NOS. 10-50219, 10-50264 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DC NO. CR 07-689-GW Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

More information

Docket

Docket 1 of 8 3/31/2016 1:52 PM General Docket Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 15-3909 Docketed: 12/21/2015 Nature of Suit: 4360 Other Personal Injury Jim Sciaroni v. Target Corporation,

More information

Docket

Docket 1 of 8 8/14/2015 5:17 PM General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 15-1544 Docketed: 05/08/2015 Nature of Suit: 3410 Antitrust Shane Group, Inc., et

More information

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1 of 7 5/31/2007 10:11 AM General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 03-2058 Filed: 9/9/03 Nsuit: 1442 Civil Rights: Jobs EEOC, et al v. Paul Hall Center, et al

More information

Orders/Judgments Lists

Orders/Judgments Lists 1 of 6 7/10/2007 12:37 AM Orders/Judgments Lists General Docket US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 90-5293 Filed: 9/19/90 Nsuit: 2440 Civil

More information

Docket

Docket General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 17-20505 Docketed: 08/08/2017 Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights Jose Iraheta v. Linebarger Goggan Blair,

More information

No , , Consolidated with Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No , , Consolidated with Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 15-3912, 16-1203, 16-1408 Consolidated with Nos. 15-3909, 15-1245 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation LEIF

More information

Docket

Docket 1 of 8 9/18/2015 12:57 PM General Docket Third Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-4318 Docketed: 11/29/2012 Nature of Suit: 4160 Stockholders Suits Termed: 01/15/2014 In re: Johnson

More information

https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/transportroom

https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/transportroom Page 1 of 12 General Docket Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-3753 Docketed: 11/19/2012 Nature of Suit: 3710 Fair Labor Standards Peg Bouaphakeo, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

More information

JJ Richard Cottone v. Kenneth C. Jenne, II

JJ Richard Cottone v. Kenneth C. Jenne, II United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 56 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30303-2289 (404) 335-6100 02-14529-JJ Richard Cottone v. Kenneth C. Jenne, II Closed Docket #: 02-14529-JJ Short

More information

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 12-16944 12/27/2012 ID: 8454094 DktEntry: 15 Page: 1 of 8 Nos. 12-16944, 12-17053 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ORACLE CORPORATION; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION;

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1177 Document #1653244 Filed: 12/28/2016 Page 1 of 5 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PHH CORPORATION, PHH MORTGAGE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:09-cv-13616-AJT-MKM Doc # 248 Filed 03/14/14 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 10535 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pension

More information

No: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN C. GORMAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant

No: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. JOHN C. GORMAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant Case: 06-17226 03/09/2009 Page: 1 of 21 DktEntry: 6838631 No: 06-17226 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN C. GORMAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON,

More information

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. TIMOTHY WHITE, ROBERT L. BETTINGER, and MARGARET SCHOENINGER,

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. TIMOTHY WHITE, ROBERT L. BETTINGER, and MARGARET SCHOENINGER, Case: 12-17489 09/22/2014 ID: 9248883 DktEntry: 63 Page: 1 of 12 Case No. 12-17489 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TIMOTHY WHITE, ROBERT L. BETTINGER, and MARGARET SCHOENINGER,

More information

**ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 8, 2017** IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

**ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 8, 2017** IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #16-5345 Document #1703161 Filed: 11/06/2017 Page 1 of 10 **ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 8, 2017** IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT The National

More information

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia Court of Appeals of Virginia Appellate Filing Procedure Lantagne Legal Printing 801 East Main Street, Suite 100 Post Office Box 2472 Richmond, Virginia 23219 2472 (804) 644 0477 1 800 847 0477 FAX (804)

More information

Case: /15/2012 ID: DktEntry: 269 Page: 1 of 8. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BILL OF COSTS

Case: /15/2012 ID: DktEntry: 269 Page: 1 of 8. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BILL OF COSTS Case: 07-15763 06/15/2012 ID: 8216136 DktEntry: 269 Page: 1 of 8 Innt 10. Bill of Costs (Rev. 12-1-09) United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BILL OF COSTS Note: If you wish to File a bill

More information

If you are or were employed by Farmers Insurance Exchange as a claims representative, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you are or were employed by Farmers Insurance Exchange as a claims representative, a class action settlement may affect your rights. NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING Alvarez, et al, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange United States District Court, Northern District of California Case No. 14-CV-0574 WHO If you are

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session UNIVERSITY PARTNERS DEVELOPMENT v. KENT BLISS, Individually and d/b/a K & T ENTERPRISES Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 06-74246 10/16/2009 Page: 1 of 8 DktEntry: 7097686 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT XILINX, INC., and CONSOLIDATED ) SUBSIDIARIES ) ) Petitioner-Appellee ) ) Nos. 06-74246

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 14-16437, 08/08/2016, ID: 10078012, DktEntry: 37-1, Page 1 of 12 (1 of 17) FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOLLINS LAW,

More information

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Second Circuit Court of Appeals

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Second Circuit Court of Appeals US District Court of Appeals Docket as of 07/28/2005 Retrieved from the court on Wednesday, October 11, 2006 General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Second Circuit Court of Appeals Court

More information

General Docket Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

General Docket Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket as of 04/16/2003 Retrieved from the court on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 General Docket Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 02-3783 Filed: 11/14/2002 Nsuit:

More information

No Eugene Evan Baker, Plaintiff-Appellant, Defendants-Appellees.

No Eugene Evan Baker, Plaintiff-Appellant, Defendants-Appellees. Case: 13-56454 10/07/2014 ID: 9269307 DktEntry: 10 Page: 1 of 10 No. 13-56454 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Eugene Evan Baker, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. Eric H. Holder, Jr.,

More information

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15-3582 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit RUTHELLE FRANK, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, SCOTT WALKER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal from the United States

More information

General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit

General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 08-10630 Docketed: 07/01/2008 Nature of Suit: 3446 Amer w/disabilities Act - Other Termed: 09/15/2011 Richard

More information

Case: , 01/04/2019, ID: , DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 01/04/2019, ID: , DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 16-56663, 01/04/2019, ID: 11141257, DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JAN 4 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

More information

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11 Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al. Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Chapter 11 Debtors. ----------------------------------------X

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN

More information

Docket No In The United States Court of Appeals For The First Circuit. Appellee, DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant Appellant.

Docket No In The United States Court of Appeals For The First Circuit. Appellee, DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, Defendant Appellant. Case: 16-6001 Document: 00117102232 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Entry ID: 6060379 Docket No. 16-6001 In The United States Court of Appeals For The First Circuit UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. DZHOKHAR

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT REICHERT, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-15503 NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., a D.C. No. foreign corporation doing

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 16-757 In the Supreme Court of the United States DOMICK NELSON, PETITIONER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

More information

FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT. the trial court s Final Judgment entered July 16, 2014, in favor of Appellee, Emergency

FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT. the trial court s Final Judgment entered July 16, 2014, in favor of Appellee, Emergency IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000054-A-O Lower Case No.: 2011-SC-008737-O Appellant, v.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as OSI Funding Corp. v. Huth, 2007-Ohio-5292.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OSI FUNDING CORPORATION Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- MICHELA HUTH Defendant-Appellant JUDGES:

More information

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW AUERNHEIMER,

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW AUERNHEIMER, Case: 13-1816 Document: 003111397044 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/23/2013 NO. 13-1816 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V. ANDREW AUERNHEIMER, On Appeal From The

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 13-16588, 11/09/2015, ID: 9748489, DktEntry: 30-1, Page 1 of 7 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Counter-defendant- Appellee,

More information

CASE NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. SANDRA CLARK and RHONDA KNOOP,

CASE NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. SANDRA CLARK and RHONDA KNOOP, CASE NO. 03-6393 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SANDRA CLARK and RHONDA KNOOP, v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and ELI BROCK, Defendants-Appellees. On

More information

Third Circuit Civil Appeals: Appellant s Brief and Appendix

Third Circuit Civil Appeals: Appellant s Brief and Appendix Resource ID: W-011-2754 Third Circuit Civil Appeals: Appellant s Brief and Appendix STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY AND ADRIENNE C. ROGOVE, BLANK ROME LLP, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION Search the Resource ID numbers

More information

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Appellant,

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Appellant, Case: 16-16056, 03/24/2017, ID: 10370294, DktEntry: 27-1, Page 1 of 7 Case No. 16-16056 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. TEMPUR-SEALY

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 10, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00769-CV DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee On Appeal from

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, * v. * * No LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF * NORTH AMERICA, et al.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, * v. * * No LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF * NORTH AMERICA, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERIN SANBORN-ADLER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. No. 11-20184 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees. MOTION OF THE SECRETARY

More information

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:08-cv JSW. Parties and Attorneys

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:08-cv JSW. Parties and Attorneys US District Court Civil Docket as of 12/9/2008 Retrieved from the court on Thursday, December 11, 2008 U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:08-cv-05229-JSW

More information

Case: Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/

Case: Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/ Case: 18-1586 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 06/05/2018 2018-1586 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE INTELLIGENT MEDICAL OBJECTS, INC., Appellant. Appeal from the United States Patent

More information

No. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

No. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Judgment rendered August 1, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * WEST

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 11-16234 08/08/2013 ID: 8735246 DktEntry: 48-1 Page: 1 of 17 (1 of 22) FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILLIP R. CORVELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO

More information

F I L E D September 14, 2012

F I L E D September 14, 2012 Case: 12-10136 Document: 00511988633 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2012 IN E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR E FIF CIRCUIT DR. JANE GRAYSON WIGGINTON, v. No.12-10136 Summary Calendar E BANK OF NEW YORK

More information

No CV. In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas

No CV. In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas No. 05-15-01559-CV ACCEPTED 05-15-01559-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 8/4/2017 4:19 PM LISA MATZ CLERK In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas DAWN NETTLES, Appellant, v. GTECH CORPORATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. Doc. Case :0-cv-0-MJJ Document Filed 0//00 Page of LEE H. RUBIN (SBN ) SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 0) Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 00 Palo Alto, CA 0 Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0)

More information

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER 50 WEST WASHINGTON STREET ROOM - CL 21 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 (312) 744-4095 www.cityofchicago.org/lac The

More information

You Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to June 23, 2014.

You Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to June 23, 2014. United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Michigan You Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Case No CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, et al.,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Case No CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, et al., Case: 10-35642 08/27/2013 ID: 8758655 DktEntry: 105 Page: 1 of 14 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case No. 10-35642 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

More information

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent. 29 Cal. App. 4th 1384, *; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1113, **; 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 782, ***; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8396 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 26, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2650 Lower Tribunal Nos. 08-21731, 08-22479, 08-22491,

More information

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv JSR

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv JSR US District Court Civil Docket as of 7/01/2011 Retrieved from the court on July 21, 2011 U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-01461-JSR Shrader

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit MORRIS SHELKOFSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. 2013-5083 Appeal from the

More information

In this PIP case, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. (State Farm), the Defendant below,

In this PIP case, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. (State Farm), the Defendant below, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. WORLD HEALTH WELLNESS, INC. a/a/o Glenda Pinero, Appellee.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Defendants-Appellees. Case: 17-10238 Document: 00514003289 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/23/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Case: 16-1913 Document: 54-1 Page: 1 Filed: 07/27/2017 (1 of 12) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ACCOMPANIED BY OPINION OPINION FILED AND JUDGMENT ENTERED:

More information

FName LName Addr1 Addr2 City, St Zip-Zip4

FName LName Addr1 Addr2 City, St Zip-Zip4 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOSE M. CASAS and ALEX JIMENEZ, et al., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 12:26:29 2013-CA-02145-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA 02145 STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Appellee

More information

Case 2:17-cv CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cv CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:17-cv-01502-CB Document 28 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION ) BUREAU, ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/6/2016 2:17 PM, Jon S. Wheeler, First District Court of Appeal FLORIDA OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION, and DAVID ALTMAIER, Solely in

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1451 SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ACCU-SORT SYSTEMS, INC., METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC., PSC INC., TEKLOGIX CORPORATION, ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,

More information

101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies

101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies [Cite as Kemp v. Kemp, 2011-Ohio-177.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEANNE KEMP, NKA GAGE Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- MICHAEL KEMP Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. Julie A. Edwards,

More information

Appeals Court Strikes Down Labor Department s Interpretation Regarding Exempt Status of Mortgage Loan Officers

Appeals Court Strikes Down Labor Department s Interpretation Regarding Exempt Status of Mortgage Loan Officers July 11, 2013 Practice Groups: Labor, Employment and Workplace Safety, Consumer Financial Services, and Global Government Solutions UPDATED TO REFLECT FILING OF PETITION FOR REHEARING Appeals Court Strikes

More information

Round 2 on the Legal Challenges to Contraceptive Coverage: Are Nonprofits Substantially Burdened by the Accommodation?

Round 2 on the Legal Challenges to Contraceptive Coverage: Are Nonprofits Substantially Burdened by the Accommodation? Round 2 on the Legal Challenges to Contraceptive Coverage: Are Nonprofits Substantially Burdened by the Accommodation? The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires most private health insurance plans to provide

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BRIAN FOGARTY and CHRISTINE FOGARTY, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

More information

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement Fund and Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement Fund and Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System Case :-cv-00-dmg-sh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 WESTERMAN LAW CORP. Jeff S. Westerman (SBN Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0-0 Fax: (0 0-0 jwesterman@jswlegal.com

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-457 KENT SMITH, D.V.M., Individually and d/b/a PERRY VET SERVICES APPELLANT V. KIMBERLY V. FREEMAN and ARMISTEAD COUNCIL FREEMAN, JR. APPELLEES Opinion

More information

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this

More information

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL-16-38707 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 177 September Term, 2017 DAWUD J. BEST v. COHN, GOLDBERG AND DEUTSCH, LLC Berger,

More information

HOW TO FILE A PETITION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC AND HEARING EN BANC IN AN IMMIGRATION CASE

HOW TO FILE A PETITION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC AND HEARING EN BANC IN AN IMMIGRATION CASE PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 Updated April 29, 2011 HOW TO FILE A PETITION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC AND HEARING EN BANC IN AN IMMIGRATION CASE By Beth Werlin After a court of appeals renders a decision,

More information

[Cite as Oh v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 2004-Ohio-565.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

[Cite as Oh v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 2004-Ohio-565.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT [Cite as Oh v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 2004-Ohio-565.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT KONG T. OH, M.D., d.b.a. ) CASE NO. 02 CA 142 OH EYE ASSOCIATES )

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv CW

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv CW NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JUN 4 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS HOTCHALK, INC. No. 16-17287 v. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-03883-CW

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 05-1275 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS FOUNDATION USA, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500 Docket Number(s): Motion for: Set forth below precise,

More information

Green Machine Corp v. Zurich Amer Ins Grp

Green Machine Corp v. Zurich Amer Ins Grp 2002 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-20-2002 Green Machine Corp v. Zurich Amer Ins Grp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3635

More information

Received by Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two

Received by Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two No. E067711 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO MACY'S WEST STORES, INC., DBA MACY'S, AND MACY'S, INC., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 02 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL MALONE et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. AHRENS & DeANGELI,

More information

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1 of 8 6/22/2007 11:20 AM General Docket US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 93-6216 Filed: 8/12/93 Nsuit: 2890 STATUTES-Other Haitian Centers, et al v. Sale, et al Appeal

More information

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Please read this Notice carefully.

More information

TAKING IT TO THE BANC by Marc J. Poster. En banc : With all judges present and participating; in full court. Black s Law Dictionary 546 (7th ed.

TAKING IT TO THE BANC by Marc J. Poster. En banc : With all judges present and participating; in full court. Black s Law Dictionary 546 (7th ed. TAKING IT TO THE BANC by Marc J. Poster En banc : With all judges present and participating; in full court. Black s Law Dictionary 546 (7th ed. 1999) The recent increase in the number of en banc proceedings

More information

smb Doc 72 Filed 08/11/14 Entered 08/11/14 20:44:35 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

smb Doc 72 Filed 08/11/14 Entered 08/11/14 20:44:35 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 Pg 1 of 5 Baker & Hostetler LLP Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza 919 Third Avenue New York, NY 10111 New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Telephone: (212) 756-2000 Facsimile: (212)

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2013 EMMETT B. HAGOOD, III, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

More information

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT KAWA ORTHODONTICS, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT KAWA ORTHODONTICS, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, Case: 14-10296 Date Filed: 04/11/2014 Page: 1 of 8 No. 14-10296 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT KAWA ORTHODONTICS, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT

More information

Robert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc

Robert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc 2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-4-2013 Robert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-3020

More information

Case , Document 180, 06/09/2016, , Page1 of 16. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit

Case , Document 180, 06/09/2016, , Page1 of 16. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit Case 14-3648, Document 180, 06/09/2016, 1790425, Page1 of 16 14-3648-cv In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, CORP, as Receiver for Colonial

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ACTION RECYCLING INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HEATHER BLAIR, IRS Agent, Respondents-Appellees. No. 12-35338

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOANNE BERGEN, ANDREW C. MATTELIANO, NANCY A. MATTELIANO, KEVIN KARLSON, BARBARA KARLSON, ROBERT BRADSHAW, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:16-cv-8897

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:16-cv-8897 Case :-cv-0-dmg-jpr Document - Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 OWEN P. MARTIKAN (CA Bar No. 0) E-mail: owen.martikan@cfpb.gov MEGHAN SHERMAN CATER (pro hac vice pending) E-mail: meghan.sherman@cfpb.gov

More information

Wayne W. Williams, in his official capacity as the Colorado Secretary of State; Colorado Department of State; and the State of Colorado,

Wayne W. Williams, in his official capacity as the Colorado Secretary of State; Colorado Department of State; and the State of Colorado, 15CA2017 Natl Fed of Ind Bus v Williams 03-02-2017 COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS DATE FILED: March 2, 2017 CASE NUMBER: 2015CA2017 Court of Appeals No. 15CA2017 City and County of Denver District Court No.

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. ELIA BRUNS, Appellant V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. ELIA BRUNS, Appellant V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 4, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00090-CV ELIA BRUNS, Appellant V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from

More information

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HAROLD BERNARD CLARK, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.

More information

FEB 17 ZOiZ CLERK OF COURT SUPREMECOURT FOHBO FEH "L IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO IN RE:

FEB 17 ZOiZ CLERK OF COURT SUPREMECOURT FOHBO FEH L IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO IN RE: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN RE: THE CONTEST OF THE ELECTION HELD ON STARK COUNTY ISSUE 6 (LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 8, 2011 CASE NO. 12-0184 On appeal from

More information

Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1

Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1 Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1 Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

More information

Appellant, CASE NO.: CVA v. Lower Court Case No.: 2006-SC-922 FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT

Appellant, CASE NO.: CVA v. Lower Court Case No.: 2006-SC-922 FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA GLORIA METCALF, Appellant, CASE NO.: CVA1 07-10 v. Lower Court Case No.: 2006-SC-922 CRYSTAL ORTIZ, Appellee. / Appeal

More information