EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration EU VAT FORUM
|
|
- Dina May
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Tax Tax administration administration and and fight fight against against tax tax fraud fraud Brussels, 2 February 2015 EU VAT FORUM WORKING DOCUMENT VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE AND RELATED ISSUES Introduction 1. This point has been raised for discussion, taking into account the wish to promote an environment where business are encouraged to disclose mistakes in "genuine" cases, without impact on VAT revenues. 2. It has been agreed that voluntary disclosure programs could be beneficial for business and Member States. 3. It has been made clear that the features and conditions of voluntary disclosure schemes in so far as they exist in the Member States are quite different. 4. Particular attention has been paid to national practices with regard to sanctions imposed in case of voluntary disclosure. Part 2 of this document provides a more detailed list of potential recommendations with regard to sanctions in relation to the use of voluntary disclosure programs. 1
2 Part 1 General considerations concerning the features and conditions of voluntary disclosure programs 1. Voluntary disclosure of errors as an incentive for a correct application of the VAT rules 1.1. The VAT legislation is complex and multiple obligations are imposed on the taxable persons. Even attentive taxable persons can make mistakes (just as attentive VAT officials) As taxable persons play an important role in the collection of VAT, they should be encouraged in their efforts to be compliant with the VAT rules. A voluntary disclosure scheme, encouraging the taxable persons to correct previous mistakes on their own initiative, contributes to a climate of good cooperation between the taxable persons and the VAT authorities Voluntary disclosure schemes should be clearly distinguished from tax amnesty measures The principle of equal treatment does not require that a taxable person applying a voluntary disclosure scheme should automatically be treated exactly as a taxable person who has been compliant from the start, since these persons are not in a comparable situation Member States should not allow an abuse of a voluntary disclosure scheme. Therefore it shouldn t dispense taxable persons from their VAT obligations in general (due diligence) and it should ensure that taxpayers cannot unduly obtain an advantage from their earlier non-compliance (for instance: cash flow benefit) It is for the internal legal order of each Member State to lay down the conditions and consequences relating to voluntary disclosure. But when determining these conditions and consequences, Member States should take into account the principle of proportionality. Member States should distinguish different situations, taking account of (e.g.) the behavior of the taxable person concerned, the type of mistake committed (genuine errors or negligence), and the financial impact on the Member State revenue (interest). It appears that some Member States have chosen not to levy any sanction in case of voluntary disclosure (of 'genuine' errors?), while others seem to apply a (small or a larger) penalty, interest or a fee for late disclosure in all circumstances. 1 Cf. M. Cadesky, I. Hayes and D. Russell, Towards greater fairness in taxation. A model taxpayer charter. Preliminary report, AOTCA, CFE, STEP, 2013, p ; OECD, Voluntary disclosure regarding past non-compliance (in Offshore voluntary disclosure, comparative analysis, guidance end policy advice, part II, September 2010). 2 Cf. EUCJ , C-3/13, Baltic Agro, point 44 (concerning customs). 2
3 Imposing fees (not having the character of a sanction) may be considered as an incentive to promote compliant behaviour. However, such fees should be set at a reasonable level, taking into consideration the specific circumstances of the case, the actions taken by the taxpayer, whether there were any revenue impacts for the Member States and if yes to which extent. For example, in a scenario where both the supplier and customer are businesses with full entitlement to deduct input VAT being in agreement, based on the interpretation of the law, to treat a transaction as not subject to VAT but it turns out later on as the transaction is complex and the law leaves room for interpretation - that the transaction was vat-able (for example an asset sale of a business was treated as a transfer of a going concern, which later on was found as being incorrect, so VAT is now charged retroactively on the asset sale and paid to the tax authorities by the supplier and deducted as input VAT by the customer upon receipt of the invoice from the supplier). In such a scenario, if assessed at all, a fee should be set at a reasonable level and should rather have a character of a handling/administrative fee and not of a sanction. 2. Time frame for making a voluntary disclosure? 2.1. Discussions have revealed that some Member States do not allow the benefit of the voluntary disclosure scheme after (the announcement of) a tax audit or a tax assessment for a certain tax period. It is considered that in case of prompted disclosures, triggered by an audit (announcement) or a tax assessment, Member States can refuse a (full) waiver of penalties. A Member State however indicated that taxable persons under investigation can anyhow sign an agreement acknowledging non-compliance elements and obtain a reduced penalty (under the condition of full settlement in one month time). In other situations where the error was not reported as soon as it was detected by the person concerned, and where the person who detected it did not take due care to report the error timely after detection (there was no good reason for not reporting the error timely after detection), Member States may also take this into account in their decision about applying a penalty, a fee or interest At the same time, it has been observed that errors can remain unnoticed for years, both for the tax payer acting in good faith as for the tax authorities. For instance, errors can be revealed by a judgment delivered much later. Therefore, the fact that a voluntary disclosure is made a long time after the occurrence of the error should not automatically exclude the benefit of the voluntary disclosure scheme This question is also influenced by the following aspects: - the length of the VAT return periods in each Member State; - the fact that when tax authorities and business have regular electronic exchanges, also in certain cases with a specific account for each taxpayer, correction of errors is part of the electronic return and payment process. So, changes in the tax return would not be considered as part of a voluntary disclosure scheme but as part of the normal business process. 3
4 Part 2 Voluntary disclosure and sanctions 1. General considerations 1.1. In the absence of harmonisation of European Union legislation in the field of the penalties applicable in cases where conditions laid down by arrangements under such legislation are not complied with, Member States retain the power to choose the penalties which seem to them to be appropriate (see EUCJ , C-424/12, Fatorie, point 50) When exercising this competence, Member States should ensure that their sanctions have a deterrent effect, in particular when VAT fraud is concerned. This implies that voluntary disclosure schemes are not meant to mitigate sanctions in case of fraud. - EUCJ , C-439/04 and C-440/04 Kittel & Recolta: 54 As the Court has already observed, preventing tax evasion, avoidance and abuse is an objective recognised and encouraged by the Sixth Directive (see Joined Cases C-487/01 and C-7/02 Gemeente Leusden and Holin Groep [2004] ECR I-5337, paragraph 76). Community law cannot be relied on for abusive or fraudulent ends (see, inter alia, Case C-367/96 Kefalas and Others [1998] ECR I-2843, paragraph 20; Case C-373/97 Diamantis [2000] ECR I-1705, paragraph 33; and Case C-32/03 Fini H [2005] ECR I- 1599, paragraph 32) When exercising this competence to choose penalties, Member States should also ensure that their penalties system encourages taxable persons to be compliant. At the same time, it was noted that voluntary disclosure schemes are not meant to put a taxable person in a better position than if he would have been compliant from the start (for instance: cash flow advantage). 2. Proportionality of sanctions 2.1. Principle: In each case, sanctions should respect the proportionality requirement. - EUCJ , C-424/12, Fatorie: 50 Concerning the default interest, it must be observed that, in the absence of harmonisation of European Union legislation in the field of the penalties applicable in cases where conditions laid down by arrangements under such legislation are not complied with, Member States retain the power to choose the penalties which seem to them to be appropriate. They must, however, exercise that power in accordance with European Union law and its general principles, and, consequently, in accordance with the principle of proportionality (see, to that effect, inter alia, Case C-210/91 Commission v Greece [1992] ECR I-6735, paragraph 19 and the case-law cited; Case C-213/99 de Andrade [2000] ECR I-11083, paragraph 20; and Rodopi-M 91, paragraph 31). 4
5 2.2. Recommendation: Member States should have a voluntary disclosure scheme allowing taxable persons to correct simple errors without incurring a sanction. However, the following restrictions could be applied: 3 4 a) This should not be guaranteed in situations of negligence, fraud or evasion or abuse (e.g. if a taxable person regularly makes the same errors, leading to a late payment of the VAT due on his transactions). b) It should not prevent the authorities from imposing interest (at a reasonable rate 3 ), in so far as the error led to a financial disadvantage for the authorities (e.g. such a financial disadvantage could result from the deduction of non-deductible input VAT, or the erroneous application of a reduced VAT rate). When assessing this financial disadvantage, the situation of the taxable person's customer could be taken into account as well (e.g. if the VAT concerned would be immediately deductible for the customer, this would influence the financial disadvantage for the Member State). Therefore before imposing interest (either on the supplier or on the customer), tax authorities need to look at the overall picture of the underlying transaction and need to assess whether the VAT treatment applied by the taxpayer on this transaction has caused any financial disadvantage for the tax authorities, which is normally not the case if both parties to a transaction the supplier and the customer are fully entitled to recover input VAT. 4 Note: Even if there is no (or only a limited) financial disadvantage for the Member State, this does not imply that no interest can be charged. But in that case, the default interest would have the character of a penalty, which would imply that the proportionality principle has to be taken into account. - EUCJ, , C-424/12, Fatorie: 50 Concerning the default interest, it must be observed that, in the absence of harmonisation of European Union legislation in the field of the penalties applicable in cases where conditions laid down by arrangements under such legislation are not complied with, Member States retain the power to choose the penalties which seem to them to be appropriate. They must, however, exercise that power in accordance with European Union law and its general principles, and, consequently, in accordance with the principle of proportionality (see, to that effect, inter alia, Case C-210/91 Commission v Greece [1992] ECR I-6735, paragraph 19 and the case-law cited; Case C-213/99 de Andrade [2000] ECR I-11083, paragraph 20; and Rodopi- M 91, paragraph 31). c) It should not prevent the authorities from imposing an administrative fee (also at a reasonable rate or amount) if the correction could imply possible additional administrative costs linked to the control of the correction. This interest rate should not be diverging too much from the normal commercial interest rates. If the interest rate were too high, a question could be raised about its conformity with Art. 1 of the First protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the property right. (If the person concerned would bear a disproportionate and excessive burden, this would be inconsistent with the need to preserve a fair balance between his interests and the interests of the State). See also Lucerne Communique of the OECD dated September 9 th /10 th 2009 where it is referred to that tax administrations are encouraged to ensure that penalties for genuine mistakes made by business have regard to the net amount of revenue lost. 5
6 2.3. Recommendation: the sanctions should take account of the gravity of the offence. In this regard, the following should be observed: a) Sanctions can be more severe if the same offence is repeated or if there are multiple offences. But sanctions should not be aggravated for the reason of repeated/multiple offences if the previous "offences" related to situations where the legislation was not clear, precise and foreseeable, or where the taxable person could rely on his legitimate expectations. A "continued" offence (e.g. a reporting error with regard to specific transactions that is always repeated) should not automatically be considered as a situation of "repeated or multiple" errors, implying an accumulation of sanctions for each of these offences or the automatic exclusion from the voluntary disclosure scheme. b) The amount of the VAT at stake should not be the (only) decisive criterion to assess the gravity of the offence. c) The precise circumstances of the case and the actions of the person concerned should be taken into account (simple error in good faith by a person (cf. supra) vs. situations of negligence, tax fraud or evasion or abuse). If the tax authorities are not required to make this distinction on their own initiative, the person concerned should at least have the right to demonstrate that he was acting in good faith Recommendation: the need to ensure proportionality implies that the tax authorities possess the authority to exercise discretion and waive penalties in duly justified circumstances, in order to guarantee fairness, and that the same competence is attributed to the judge who is competent to control the validity and the proportionality of the administrative sanctions. 3. No penalty if the legislation is not clear 3.1. Principle: a penalty should only be imposed if there is a clear and unambiguous legal basis. The taxable person should not be punished if the rules of law are not clear and precise and if their application is not foreseeable. - EUCJ , C-255/02, Halifax: 93 It must also be borne in mind that a finding of abusive practice must not lead to a penalty, for which a clear and unambiguous legal basis would be necessary, but rather to an obligation to repay, simply as a consequence of that finding, which rendered undue all or part of the deductions of input VAT (see, to that effect, Emsland Stärke, paragraph 56). - EUCJ, , C-110/99, Emsland-Stärke: 56. Contrary to the assertions of Emsland-Stärke, the obligation to repay refunds received in the event that the two constituent elements of an abuse are established would not breach the principle of lawfulness. The obligation to repay is not a penalty for which a clear and unambiguous legal basis would be necessary, but simply the consequence of a finding that the conditions required to obtain the advantage derived from the Community rules were created artificially, thereby rendering the refunds granted undue payments and thus justifying the obligation to repay them. 6
7 3.2. Recommendation: a taxable person should not be punished if he demonstrates his good faith (= the criterion "he didn't know and he didn't have to know", implying that he conducted his business with appropriate due diligence, having sincere reasons to think that he was acting in accordance with the law). Example: if it was reasonable to interpret a legal provision in the way it was interpreted by the taxable person Recommendation: a taxable person should not be punished if he informed the authorities about a discrepancy or an uncertainty in the law, and took a provisional position, waiting for the authorities' instructions or guidance. Example: there was doubt on the VAT There was doubt on the VAT treatment of a big indemnification claim paid to a subcontractor for not ordering enough pieces on yearly basis. The subcontractor worked exclusively for this client. Question was whether this payment was to be seen as out of scope VAT (indemnification) or a consideration for the exclusiveness commitment. Taxpayer took position, invoiced, filed return and marked in a special box in its VAT return the uncertainty. The use of this special box made penalties legally impossible and obliges tax authorities to take position within 3 months. A letter explaining the case and position was sent to tax authorities. Tax authorities confirmed in writing the taxpayers position within a three month delay. During audit, the topic was addressed as debatable but accepted immediately after showing the confirmation letter. 4. No punishment in case of legitimate expectations 4.1. Principle: tax authorities have to respect the legitimate and reasonable expectations that they have created themselves. This applies in situations where the conduct of the authorities gives rise to a reasonable expectation in the mind of a reasonably prudent economic agent. - EUCJ 9 October 2014, C-492/13, Traum EOOD: 28 The principle of legal certainty, the corollary of which is the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, requires, on the one hand, that rules of law must be clear and precise and, on the other, that their application must be foreseeable by those subject to them (judgment in Plantanol, C-201/08, EU:C:2009:539, paragraph 46 and the case-law cited). - EUCJ , C-181/04 to C-183/04, Elmeka: 31 Under the settled case-law of the Court, the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty form part of the Community legal order. On that basis, these principles must be respected by the institutions of the Community, but also by Member States in the exercise of the powers conferred on them by Community directives (see in particular Case C-381/97 Belgocodex [1998] ECR I-8153, paragraph 26, and Case C-376/02 Goed Wonen [2005] ECR I-3445, paragraph 32). It follows that national authorities are obliged to respect the principle of protection of the legitimate expectations of economic agents. 7
8 32 As regards the principle of protection of the legitimate expectations of the beneficiary of the favourable conduct, it is appropriate, first, to determine whether the conduct of the administrative authorities gave rise to a reasonable expectation in the mind of a reasonably prudent economic agent (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 95/74 to 98/74, 15/75 and 100/75 Union nationale des coopératives agricoles de céréales and Others v Commission and Council [1975] ECR 1615, paragraphs 43 to 45, and Case 78/77 Lührs [1978] ECR 169, paragraph 6). If it did, the legitimate nature of this expectation must then be established Recommendation: no penalty (not a fine nor any other "sanction", such as a limitation or a refusal of the right to deduction) should be applied if the taxable person was in a position where he could rely on his legitimate expectation that he was acting in accordance with the law. 8
VALUE ADDED TAX COMMITTEE (ARTICLE 398 OF DIRECTIVE 2006/112/EC) WORKING PAPER NO 921 REV
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value added tax taxud.c.1(2017)1395441 EN Brussels, 6 March 2017 VALUE ADDED TAX COMMITTEE (ARTICLE
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying the
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 14.9.2009 SEC(2009) 1168 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN
More informationSubmitted to the European Commission on 27 July 2017
Opinion Statement PAC 3/2017 on the European Commission Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation COM/2016/025
More informationThe airline VAT exemption in the European Union
COMMERCIAL AND CORPORATE FLYING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION The airline VAT exemption in the European Union 2 All AOC holders can be airlines if their operation is chiefly international 3 Is a charter operator
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 29 April 2004 *
GEMEENTE LEUSDEN AND HOLEN GROEP JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 29 April 2004 * In Joined Cases C-487/01 and C-7/02, REFERENCES to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
More informationFOURTH SECTION. Application no /08 by Alojzy FORMELA against Poland lodged on 3 June 2008 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FOURTH SECTION Application no. 31651/08 by Alojzy FORMELA against Poland lodged on 3 June 2008 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Alojzy Formela, is a Polish national who was born in 1942 and
More informationOPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL MISCHO delivered on 14 March 1989 *
OPINION OF MR MISCHO CASE C-342/87 OPINION OF MR ADVOCATE GENERAL MISCHO delivered on 14 March 1989 * Mr President, Members of the Court First question 2. The Hoge Raad formulated its first question in
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 22 December 2010 *
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 22 December 2010 * (Sixth VAT Directive Right to deduction Purchase of vehicles and use for leasing transactions Differences between the tax regimes of two Member
More informationHMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
HMRC Consultation Document Tackling Offshore Tax Evasion: A Requirement to Correct Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 This is the latest in a series of consultations by
More informationIMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 22 December 2010 (*) (Sixth VAT Directive Right to deduction
More informationCabinet ALTITUDE AVOCATS
Cabinet ALTITUDE AVOCATS 2 «Fraus omnia corrumpit» «Le droit cesse où l abus commence» (Planiol) E.U. Tax Group Seoul 2018 Eric GINTER 4/09/2018 In recent years public opinion became more and more sensitive
More informationSixth Chamber: A. Arabadjiev, President of the Chamber, C. G. Fernlund (Rapporteur) and S. Rodin, Judges Advocate General: J.
EU Court of Justice, 30 June 2016 * Case C-176/15 Guy Riskin, Geneviève Timmermans v État belge Sixth Chamber: A. Arabadjiev, President of the Chamber, C. G. Fernlund (Rapporteur) and S. Rodin, Judges
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value Added Tax VEG N O 071 REV2
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value Added Tax VAT Expert Group taxud.c.1(2018)2326098 EN Brussels, 18 April 2018 VAT EXPERT
More informationINCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. A. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives
INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT AP NUMBER LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE Initiative on introducing effective disincentives for advisors, promoters and enablers of
More informationAAT RESPONSE TO THE HMRC CONSULTATION ON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND EXPENSES EXEMPTION FOR PAID OR REIMBURSED EXPENSES
AAT RESPONSE TO THE HMRC CONSULTATION ON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND EXPENSES EXEMPTION FOR PAID OR REIMBURSED EXPENSES 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT) is pleased to comment
More informationConsultation paper Introduction of a mechanism for eliminating double imposition of VAT in individual cases
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION INDIRECT TAXATION AND TAX ADMINISTRATION VAT and other turnover taxes TAXUD/D1/. 5 January 2007 Consultation paper Introduction of a mechanism
More informationReports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 19 December 2013 *
Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 19 December 2013 * (VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Article 146 Exemptions on exportation Article 131 Conditions laid down by Member States National legislation
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value Added Tax VEG N O 042
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value Added Tax VAT Expert Group 10 th meeting 31 March 2015 taxud.c.1(2015)1342130 EN Brussels,
More informationBELGIUM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION
BELGIUM 1 BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? A major corporate income tax reform has been published
More informationa) Title of proposal Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries
Unofficial translation of the assessment by the Dutch government of the proposal of the European Commission regarding hybrid mismatches with third countries Leaflet 2: Directive on hybrid mismatches with
More informationVAT refund to Latvian companies
VAT refund to Latvian companies November 25, 2010 Marina Kuzenko Head of SRS TD Indirect Tax Methodology Division 1 Excess VAT refund procedure Regulated by: Law on Taxes and Fees; Law on Value Added Tax,
More informationCase C-6/16 Eqiom SAS, formerly Holcim France SAS, Enka SA v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics
EU Court of Justice, 7 September 2017 * Case C-6/16 Eqiom SAS, formerly Holcim France SAS, Enka SA v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics Sixth Chamber: E. Regan, President of the Chamber, A. Arabadjiev
More informationTHE RIGHT OF VAT DEDUCTION
THE RIGHT OF VAT DEDUCTION Professor Konstantinos D. Finokaliotis Under the common VAT system, the right of deduction is prescribed by Articles 167 et seq. of EU Directive 2006/112/EC (previously Articles
More informationVAT UAE, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Dubai, Pakistan and Sri Lanka 2016
VAT UAE, Pakistan and Sri Lanka Dubai, Pakistan and Sri Lanka 2016 VAT Arif Masud Mirza Head of Policy ACCA 2 29/03/ 2017 Budget Breakfast - 19 March 2015 ACCA Tax principles ACCA believes there are key
More informationProfits which a subsidiary distributes to its parent company shall be exempt from withholding tax.
EC Court of Justice, 3 June 2010 * Case C-487/08 European Commission v Kingdom of Spain First Chamber: A. Tizzano, President of the Chamber, E. Levits (Rapporteur), A. Borg Barthet, J.-J. Kasel and M.
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 25.10.2004 COM(2004) 709 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION Implementation by Member States of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities
More informationThe conceptual boundaries of tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning. Pasquale Pistone Kiev (Ukraine), 6 February 2018
The conceptual boundaries of tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning Pasquale Pistone Kiev (Ukraine), 6 February 2018 Outline 1. Tax avoidance and abusive practices 2. The reaction to tax avoidance 3.
More informationEC Court of Justice, 5 July Case C-321/05. Hans Markus Kofoed v Skatteministeriet
EC Court of Justice, 5 July 2007 Case C-321/05 Hans Markus Kofoed v Skatteministeriet First Chamber: Advocate General: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. Tizzano, A. Borg Barthet, M. Ileapplei
More informationGeneral Comments. Action 6 on Treaty Abuse reads as follows:
OECD Centre on Tax Policy and Administration Tax Treaties Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise: Comments on
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 26 April 2005 *
JUDGMENT OF 26. 4. 2005 - CASE C-376/02 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 26 April 2005 * In Case C-376/02, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
More information4. Article 63(1) TFEU and Article 65(1)(a) TFEU constitute the EU law framework for this case.
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar, 10 September 2015 1 Case C-252/14 Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek v Skatteverket Introduction 1. It is a well-established principle of the case-law of the Court that,
More informationEU VAT FORUM WORKING DOCUMENT DOCUMENT ELABORATED BY THE BUSINESS EXPERT GROUP (BEGV): DOING BUSINESS IN PAST AND PRESENT TIMES
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Tax administration and fight against tax fraud Brussels, 15.1.2013 EU VAT FORUM WORKING DOCUMENT
More informationJoined cases C-398/16 and C-399/16 X BV (C-398/16), X NV (C-399/16) v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
EU Court of Justice, 22 February 2018 * Joined cases C-398/16 and C-399/16 X BV (C-398/16), X NV (C-399/16) v Staatssecretaris van Financiën First Chamber: R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber,
More informationInternational Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 250
International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 250 Section B The Auditor s Statutory Right and Duty to Report to Regulators of Public Interest Entities and Regulators of Other Entities in the Financial Sector
More informationTransfer Pricing Country Summary Ivory Coast
Page 1 of 6 Transfer Pricing Country Summary Ivory Coast July 2018 Page 2 of 6 Legislation Existence of Transfer Pricing Laws/Guidelines On 2 November 2016, Ivory Coast officially joined the Inclusive
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 28 April 2016 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 28 April 2016 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Taxation VAT Taxable transactions Application for the purposes of the business of goods acquired in the course
More informationVAT DEDUCTION FOR GOODS OR SERVICES ACQUIRED PRIOR TO THE VAT REGISTRATION MISSION (IM)POSSIBLE?
VAT DEDUCTION FOR GOODS OR SERVICES ACQUIRED PRIOR TO THE VAT REGISTRATION MISSION (IM)POSSIBLE? Every analysis of the VAT system and each EU Court of Justice judgment pertaining to VAT start with the
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 28 July 2011 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 28 July 2011 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Sixth VAT Directive Article 13B(d)(3) and (5) Exemptions Transfers and payments Transactions in securities Electronic
More information(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
11.3.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 64/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing
More informationBEPS ACTION 2: NEUTRALISE THE EFFECTS OF HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS
Public Discussion Draft BEPS ACTION 2: NEUTRALISE THE EFFECTS OF HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS (Treaty Issues) 19 March 2014 2 May 2014 Comments on this note should be sent electronically (in Word format)
More informationCHILE GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
CHILE 1 CHILE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? On 2014, a tax reform was enacted in Chile whose provisions
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 20 June 2018 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 June 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2017/0251 (CNS) 2017/0249 (NLE) 2017/0248 (CNS) 10335/18 FISC 266 ECOFIN 638 NOTE From: To: No. Cion doc.: Subject:
More informationWORKING PAPER. Brussels, 15 February 2019 WK 2235/2019 INIT LIMITE ECOFIN FISC
Brussels, 15 February 2019 WK 2235/2019 INIT LIMITE ECOFIN FISC WORKING PAPER This is a paper intended for a specific community of recipients. Handling and further distribution are under the sole responsibility
More informationTAX GUIDE FOR MICRO BUSINESSES 2011/12
SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE TAX GUIDE FOR MICRO BUSINESSES 2011/12 Another helpful guide brought to you by the South African Revenue Service Foreword TAX GUIDE FOR MICRO BUSINESSES 2011/12 This guide
More informationOpinion of Advocate General Kokott, 27 April Case C-39/16. Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgium. Provisional text.
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, 27 April 2017 1 Case C-39/16 Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgium I Introduction Provisional text 1. The purpose of these preliminary ruling proceedings is to clarify whether
More informationFINANCIAL CONTROL OF FUNDS CO-FINANCED FROM THE EU BUDGET: POSSIBILITIES OF CONSIDERING NEW AND MORE FAVORABLE LEGAL PROVISIONS
DOI: 10.15290/acr.2017.10.05 Stanislav Bureš Masaryk University, the Czech Republic FINANCIAL CONTROL OF FUNDS CO-FINANCED FROM THE EU BUDGET: POSSIBILITIES OF CONSIDERING NEW AND MORE FAVORABLE LEGAL
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 3 March 2005 *
JUDGMENT OF 3. 3. 2005 CASE C-32/03 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 3 March 2005 * In Case C-32/03, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Højesteret (Denmark), made by
More informationEUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 January 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0054 (COD) PE-CONS 57/10 MI 395 COMPET 304 IND 128 ECO 87 FIN 498 CODEC 1104
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 13 January 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0054 (COD) PE-CONS 57/10 MI 395 COMPET 304 IND 128 ECO 87 FIN 498 CODEC 1104 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS
More informationANTI-FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION POLICY
Issue 1 Page 1 ANTI-FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION POLICY This policy is endorsed by Harworth s Board of Directors and will be reviewed regularly. This policy may be changed from time to time and you will
More informationDirective 2011/7/EU. of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions
Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
More informationde Nederlandse Orde van Belastingadviseurs The Dutch Association of Tax Advisers
de Nederlandse Orde van Belastingadviseurs The Dutch Association of Tax Advisers Committee on Legislative Proposals Amsterdam, July 12, 2018 Subject: Proposal for a Directive amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132
More informationROMANIA. minimum of 25% of the number/value of shares or voting rights in the two entities.
ROMANIA TRANSFER PRICING COUNTRY PROFILE 1. Reference to the Arm s Length Principle The arm's length principle was introduced in the domestic tax law in 1994 and is applicable to all related party transactions,
More informationTrade Credit Insurance Policy Wording Page 1
Trade Credit Insurance Policy 1. SUBJECT OF THE INSURANCE 1.1. In consideration of the subject to the terms, conditions and definitions stipulated hereunder and in the Schedule, the Insurer undertakes
More informationÉtablissements Rimbaud SA v Directeur général des impôts, Directeur des services fiscaux d Aix-en-Provence
EU Court of Justice, 28 October 2010 * Case C-72/09 Établissements Rimbaud SA v Directeur général des impôts, Directeur des services fiscaux d Aix-en-Provence Third Chamber: K. Lenaerts, President of the
More informationA2X TRADING RULES. A2X Rules. Page 1
A2X TRADING RULES Page 1 SECTION CONTENT OF THE RULES PAGE NUMBER Index Index 2 Introduction Introduction 3 Section 1 Definitions and interpretation 4 Section 2 Applications for and termination of Membership
More informationReports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber) 18 May 2017 *
Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber) 18 May 2017 * (Reference for a preliminary ruling Taxation Value added tax (VAT) Directive 2006/112/EC Article 314 Margin scheme Conditions under
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 17 February 2005'*
LINNEWEBER AND AKRITIDIS JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 17 February 2005'* In Joined Cases C-453/02 and C-462/02, REFERENCES for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof
More informationTax evasion and collection of information on bank accounts under Greek tax legislation and case law
Tax evasion and collection of information on bank accounts under Greek tax legislation and case law By Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos (Judge at the Council of State of Greece) I. INTRODUCTION 1. There have been
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 14 September 2006 *
WOLLNY JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 14 September 2006 * In Case C-72/05, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht München (Germany), made by decision of 1
More informationInsurance Contract Act 2008
Übersetzung durch Ute Reusch. Laufende Aktualisierung der Übersetzung durch Neil Mussett. Translation provided by Ute Reusch. Translation regularly updated by Neil Mussett. Stand: Die Übersetzung berücksichtigt
More informationConsumer Taxes. Disclosures Program, which is available on the CRA website.
INTERPRETATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN CONCERNING THE LAWS AND REGULATIONS Consumer Taxes ADM. 4/R7 Voluntary Disclosure Program Date of publication: November 7, 2016 This version of bulletin ADM.
More information3.2. EU Interest-Royalty Directive Background and force
3.2. EU Interest-Royalty Directive 3.2.1. Background and force Force The Council Directive (2003/49/EC) on a Common System of Taxation Applicable to Interest and Royalty Payments Made between Associated
More information15/09/2017. Conseil des barreaux européens Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe
Conseil des barreaux européens Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe Association internationale sans but lucratif Rue Joseph II, 40 /8 1000 Bruxelles T. : +32 (0)2 234 65 10 Email : ccbe@ccbe.eu
More informationKPMG 10 Customhouse Quay P.O. Box 996 Wellington New Zealand
KPMG 10 Customhouse Quay P.O. Box 996 Wellington New Zealand Telephone +64 (4) 816 4500 Fax +64 (4) 816 4600 Internet www.kpmg.com/nz C/- Deputy Commissioner Policy and Strategy Inland Revenue Department
More information7148/16 HG/NT/kp,vm DGG 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 11 May 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0010 (CNS) 7148/16 FISC 39 ECOFIN 231 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending
More informationLetter of formal notice to Norway concerning the reporting obligation when contracts are awarded to non-norwegian contractors
Brussels, 15 December 2016 Cases No: 77290, 77291 and 78800 Document No: 819456 Decision No: 228/16/COL Ministry of Finance P.O. Box 8008 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo, Norway Dear Sir or Madam, Subject: Letter of
More informationEuropean Commission Green Paper on the Future of VAT Towards a simpler, more robust and efficient VAT system
27 May 2011 European Commission Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union VAT and other turnover taxes Unit C1 Rue Joseph II 79, Office J79 05/093 B-1049 Brussels By email: TAXUD-VATgreenpaper@ec.europa.eu
More informationVAT Tax Evasion. Measures undertaken by the Portuguese Government. The Brussels Tax Forum th of November, 2013
VAT Tax Evasion Measures undertaken by the Portuguese Government The Brussels Tax Forum 2013 18 th of November, 2013 Agenda European context Measures undertaken by the Portuguese Government to curb tax
More informationWe have seen and generally support the comments made by Law Society of England and Wales in its response (the Law Society Response).
City of London Law Society Company Law Committee response to the Department for Business Innovation and Skills Discussion Paper on Transparency & Trust: enhancing the transparency of UK company ownership
More informationEU VAT FORUM INTERIM REPORT OF THE SUB-GROUP ON CROSS- BORDER RULINGS (CBR) DECISIONS OF THE EU VAT FORUM ON THE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Tax administration and fight against tax fraud Brussels 27 June 2014 taxud.c.4/(2014)2061860rev
More informationOpinion Statement FC 9/2017. European Commission Proposals on the way towards a single European VAT area
Opinion Statement FC 9/2017 on European Commission Proposals on the way towards a single European VAT area Prepared by the CFE Fiscal Committee Submitted to the European Institutions on 1 December 2017
More informationECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 22 May on limitations to cash payments (CON/2017/18)
EN ECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 22 May 2017 on limitations to cash payments (CON/2017/18) Introduction and legal basis On 23 March 2017, the European Central Bank (ECB) received a
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to the Spring Budget 2017
Association of Accounting Technicians response to the Spring Budget 2017 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to the Spring Budget 2017 Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT) AAT awards
More informationPAPER 3.01 EU DIRECT TAX OPTION
THE ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN INTERNATIONAL TAXATION December 2016 PAPER 3.01 EU DIRECT TAX OPTION Suggested Solutions PART A Question 1 First of all it has to be established which treaty freedom is applicable
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 28 February 2008 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 28 February 2008 (*) (Freedom of establishment Taxation of companies Monetary effects upon the repatriation of start-up capital granted by a company established in
More informationLUCERNE CONFERENCE COMMUNIQUÉ
LUCERNE CONFERENCE COMMUNIQUÉ We, the senior tax policy officials from 25 OECD countries, the European Commission and 5 nonmember economies met in Lucerne, Switzerland on 9 10 September 2009 to reflect
More informationLife Assurance. Cross-border activities entirely or mainly carried out outside the home Member State
markt h.2(2010) 840921 October 2010 Life Assurance Cross-border activities entirely or mainly carried out outside the home Member State Executive Summary Some life assurance undertakings operate entirely
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 26 March 2015 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 26 March 2015 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Common system of value added tax Principles of proportionality and fiscal neutrality Taxation of a supply of
More informationPenalties and Fees Regulations
Penalties and Fees Regulations Art. 1 Penalties Sec. 1. ENLI can impose penalties on a company if the company reports advertising activities or other activities that are considered to be in breach of the
More informationE/C.18/2016/CRP.2 Attachment 9
Distr.: General * October 2016 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Twelfth Session Geneva, 11-14 October 2016 Agenda item 3 (b) (i) Update of the United Nations
More informationThe Finance Act for Enactment of a new timetable for the decrease of the rate of the corporate income tax. Repeal of the 3% tax on dividends
Overview of the main measures interesting corporations and managers in the French Finance Act, the Rectifying Finance Act for 2017 and the Social Security Financing Act The Finance Act, the Rectifying
More informationANNEX II CHANGES TO THE UN MODEL DERIVING FROM THE REPORT ON BEPS ACTION PLAN 14
E/C.18/2017/CRP.4.Annex 2 Distr.: General 28 March 2017 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Fourteenth Session New York, 3-6 April 2017 Agenda item 3 (b)
More informationSixth Chamber: A. Borg Barthet, acting as President of the Chamber, M. Berger (Rapporteur) and S. Rodin, Judges Advocate General: M.
EUJ EU Court of Justice, 19 November 2015 * Case C-632/13 Skatteverket v Hilkka Hirvonen Sixth Chamber: A. Borg Barthet, acting as President of the Chamber, M. Berger (Rapporteur) and S. Rodin, Judges
More informationSWEDEN GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
SWEDEN 1 SWEDEN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? Effective as of 1 January 2016, dividend income is not
More informationWhy not VAT on intra-eu supplies of goods and services? Christian Amand September 18th 2018
Why not VAT on intra-eu supplies of goods and services? Christian Amand September 18th 2018 1957: how to combine turnover taxes levied a each stage of the production with a future internal market? (Campet
More informationEBF POSITION ON THE REVIEW OF THE MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE
EBF Ref.D2000D-2011 Brussels, 19 December 2011 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association
More informationStrojírny Prostejov, a.s. (C-53/13), ACO Industries Tábor s.r.o. (C-80/13) v Odvolací financní reditelství
EU Court of Justice, 19 June 2014 * Joined Cases C-53/13 and C-80/13 Strojírny Prostejov, a.s. (C-53/13), ACO Industries Tábor s.r.o. (C-80/13) v Odvolací financní reditelství First Chamber: A. Tizzano
More informationECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 30 May on the limitation of cash payments (CON/2017/20)
EN ECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 30 May 2017 on the limitation of cash payments (CON/2017/20) Introduction and legal basis On 3 April 2017 the European Central Bank (ECB) received
More informationCHINA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
CHINA 1 CHINA INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? A couple of tax circulars have been released by the State
More informationFKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel
EC Court of Justice, 3 October 2006 1 Case C-290/04 FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel Grand Chamber: Advocate General: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans,
More informationLAW EU COURT OF JUSTICE EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions. Note dated 25 May 2018
EUROPEAN NEWSLETTER / MAY 2018 PIROL APENNUTOZEI. IT PIROL APENNUTOZEI & ASSOCI ATI @STUDIO_PIROLA PIROLA PENNUTO ZEI & ASSOCIATI EUROPEAN TAX NEWSLETTER MAY 2018 2 INDEX LAW 1.1... EU list of non-cooperative
More informationT HE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS D EFINITION & T REATMENT OF DAS ERRORS
T HE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS D EFINITION & T REATMENT OF DAS ERRORS E N G L II S H Introduction 4 Error definition & classification concerning the different DAS Sources 5 General situation 5 Weaknesses
More informationAnti-bribery and corruption policy. The Perse School
Anti-bribery and corruption policy The Perse School January 2019 Contents Introduction... 1 Gifts and hospitality... 2 Facilitating tax evasion... 4 Unacceptable behaviour... 6 Facilitation payments and
More informationEBF contribution to the public consultation on the EU Commission s Green Paper on the Consumer Acquis Review
AMS/DB N 411 European Commission Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection Rue de la Loi 200 B- 1049 Brussels SANCO-B2@ec.europa.eu Email Brussels, 24 May 2007 Subject: EBF contribution to the
More informationDispute Resolution: the Mutual Agreement Procedure
Papers on Selected Topics in Administration of Tax Treaties for Developing Countries Paper No. 8-A May 2013 Dispute Resolution: the Mutual Agreement Procedure Hugh Ault Professor Emeritus of Tax Law, Boston
More informationAnti-facilitation of Tax Evasion Policy
Anti-facilitation of CONTENTS 1 Policy statement 04 2 About this policy 04 3 Who must comply with this policy? 05 4 Who is responsible for the policy? 05 5 What is tax evasion facilitation? 06 6 What you
More informationFINAL NOTICE. Xcap Securities PLC FRN: London EC3V 3ND United Kingdom. Date: 31 May 2013 ACTION
FINAL NOTICE To: Xcap Securities PLC FRN: 504211 Address: 24 Cornhill London EC3V 3ND United Kingdom Date: 31 May 2013 ACTION 1. For the reasons given in this notice, the Financial Conduct Authority (
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
8.4.2016 L 94/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION IMPLEMTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/545 of 7 April 2016 on procedures and criteria concerning framework agreements for the allocation of rail
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. EGESIF_ final 22/02/2016
EGESIF_14-0015-02 final 22/02/2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING FINANCIAL CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO EXPENDITURE CO-FINANCED BY THE EU UNDER THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS AND THE EUROPEAN FISHERIES
More informationBar Council response to the consultation paper on Tackling offshore tax evasion: A new criminal offence
Bar Council response to the consultation paper on Tackling offshore tax evasion: A new criminal offence 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council)
More information