EBF contribution to the public consultation on the EU Commission s Green Paper on the Consumer Acquis Review
|
|
- Luke Hutchinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AMS/DB N 411 European Commission Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection Rue de la Loi 200 B Brussels SANCO-B2@ec.europa.eu Brussels, 24 May 2007 Subject: EBF contribution to the public consultation on the EU Commission s Green Paper on the Consumer Acquis Review Dear Sir/Madam, The European Banking Federation (EBF) is pleased to send you herewith its contribution to the public consultation on the Green Paper on the Review of the EU Consumer Acquis. We praise the Commission for this initiative that aims at introducing more consistency in EU law and promoting a more efficient legal background for the achievement of the internal market where consumers are, together with the industry, the main actors. We encourage the Commission to elaborate a coherent approach to the consumer protection legislation that helps lifting barriers to the development of the internal market for consumers. Indeed, one of the consequences of adopting harmonised rules at EU level should be a higher and more confident offer of products and services across EU member states. We see in fact no benefit in improving the level of consumer protection if the offer of products and services in Europe is not allowed to develop in parallel and regardless the method of distribution chosen. In the light of this, we consider it useful to take part in this consultation even if most of the sectoral Directives relevant to the financial industry are not covered by the scope of the Green Paper. We apologise for the delay in sending you our contribution and are grateful for the extra time you have allowed us in order to finalise the internal consultation of our membership. We remain at your entire disposal, should you wish to discuss further any of the content of the document enclosed. Yours faithfully, a.i.s.b.l. Enclosure: 1 10 rue Montoyer B Brussels +32 (0) phone +32 (0) fax Guido Ravoet Secretary General
2 P7040DEAMS EBF CONTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE EU COMMISSION S GREEN PAPER ON THE REVIEW OF THE CONSUMER LAW ACQUIS Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation (FBE) is the voice of the European banking sector. It represents the interests of over 4500 European banks, large and small, from 29 national Banking Associations, with assets of more than EUR billion and over 2.3 million employees. Introduction The European Banking Federation considers important to contribute to the consultation open by the EU Commission on the Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis. Indeed, despite the scope of the Green Paper that encompasses 8 Directives among which only one - the Unfair Terms Directive - is of relevance to the financial sector, we deem it necessary to express our views in particular on the general approach to adopt in order to review current legislation with a view to achieve a better consumer protection and the opening up of the internal market. It is indeed our understanding that other relevant directives have not been included in this exercise either due to a regulatory review run in parallel (Distance Marketing Directive), or to legislative proposals currently under discussion under the co-decision procedure (Consumer Credit Directive), or for a policy plan still to be defined (e.g. for mortgage products or bank accounts). Accordingly, the present contribution will focus on those issues that are of a general nature and will not cover the more specific aspects related to the sales contract or the other specific sectoral directives. On the consumer protection legislation already existing and under review in this Green Paper, we urge the EU legislator to elaborate a coherent approach to the consumer protection legislation that could help lifting some barriers to the development of the internal market for consumers, including those that currently affect the provision of financial services across Europe. Indeed, one of the consequences of adopting harmonised rules at EU level should be a higher and more confident offer of products and services across EU member states. We see in fact no benefit in improving the level of consumer protection if the offer of products and services in Europe is not allowed to develop in parallel and regardless the method of distribution chosen. At a more general level, we encourage the EU legislator to focus on conducting empirical research into what a reasonable customer needs in terms of retails services and to formulate accordingly a strategy for what type of consumer protection instruments should be made available to consumers. Therefore we urge the EU Commission to integrate more detailed research into genuine consumer needs in the Consumer Policy Strategy. 1. General Legislative Approach Question A1: In your opinion, which is the best approach to the review of the consumer legislation? a.i.s.b.l. We consider that a mixed approach as described under option 2 combining, where necessary, a horizontal instrument with intervention on sectoral directives, would be the best solution to bring consistency into the protection of consumers. 10 rue Montoyer B Brussels +32 (0) phone +32 (0) fax
3 Of course, we recognise that this might limit the content of such an instrument to those aspects that are horizontal in nature and can be dealt with separately from the vertical specific provisions. A horizontal instrument, if meant to apply across the sectors, would have a limited scope to only few items (e.g. the notion of consumer, the modalities for exercising the right of withdrawal) that can be considered a common denominator to all the consumer acquis, including in that case also financial services. 2. Scope of a Horizontal Instrument Question A2: What should be the scope of a possible horizontal instrument? In order to ensure legal certainty to both consumers and professionals, any horizontal instrument should apply to both domestic and cross-border situations as provided under option 1 Only in this way the simplification of the legislative framework could be achieved for the benefit of both consumers and industry. More specifically: From the consumer perspective: the basic protection needs of a consumer depend mainly on demographic factors like income, age and education rather than on nationality. Regardless of their nationality and of the place where they make a purchase (domestic or cross border), consumers should have the same basic rights. This will enable them to perceive the European Union s markets as one single market at least to some extent. From the businesses perspective: should the harmonized rules apply exclusively to cross border transactions, this would lead again to legal fragmentation since there would be two different sets of rules depending on whether the transaction is cross-border or domestic. Being obliged to comply with up to 27 different national consumer protection rules is an important cost factor that may hinder competitive national products to be offered in other markets. Moreover, any attempt to further integrate the European market should be neutral towards the method of distribution which the industry may choose. Deciding to harmonise only consumer protection rules applicable to cross-border transactions would have the effect of creating a preferential treatment for those businesses which chose cross border distribution as compared to those opting for a physical presence in the targeted market. 3. Degree of Harmonisation Question A3: What should be the level of harmonisation of the revised directives/the new instrument? The aim of any review of consumer protection rules should be to achieve full harmonisation of the most important aspects for the internal market from our perspective, the market of financial services -. This should not lead to standardisation of products but to common rules for the key elements of consumer protection, so that providers can develop and market products on a pan-european basis while relying on a sufficient level of legal certainty that developing, marketing and distributing products do not have to cope with 27 different legal systems. In order to achieve this, the EBF has been promoting a model of targeted full harmonisation which corresponds to option 1 as described in the Green Paper. Indeed, as stated in our reports of September 2004 and June 2005 commenting on the follow-up of the Financial Services Action Plan, it is our view that full harmonisation of key retail banking elements, i.e. elements that are essential to foster cross-border competition, as the most effective means of creating a genuine European internal market for retail banking services, to the benefit of consumers and businesses alike. Subject to adequate harmonisation, country of 2
4 origin rules based on the principle of mutual recognition can play a role for remaining issues and on a caseby-case basis 1. Of course, it is our view that both in a horizontal instrument and in sectoral directives, any fundamental issue should be fully harmonised, thereby leaving to mutual recognition a limited application to non essential elements. 4. Horizontal Issues 4.1 Definition of consumer and professional Question B1: How should the notions of consumer and professional be defined? Option 1 should be adopted for defining the notions of consumer and professional. Member states should not be given any room for adopting diverging national rules. It should be noted in this regard that it is surprising that the Commission does not mention the work-in-progress proposals for a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) which have already been submitted on, inter alia, this question by the Study Group on a European Civil Code. Any duplication of work should be avoided. 4.2 Consumers acting through an intermediary Question B2: Should contracts between private persons be considered as consumer contracts when one of the parties acts through a professional intermediary? In the absence of a definition of intermediary, we believe a distinction should be drawn between the case where the main parties to the contract are two consumers, one of whom is acting through an intermediary (e.g. two private parties, a seller and a buyer, that contract for the sale of a real estate via a real estate agent), and those cases where an intermediary is acting on behalf of a professional (e.g. banks distributing their financial products to consumers through agents). Only in the first case the contractual relationship can be, in our view, assimilated to some extent to a C2C contract. Accordingly, in this type of relationships consumer protection measures might appear to be too stringent and not always justified. Without a uniform definition of intermediary, any extension of provisions to cover this type of cases could encompass contractual relationship where the intermediary is not acting on behalf of any of the parties but simply puts them in contact without playing any active role in the conclusion of the contract. Any extension of consumer protection rules to cases where intermediaries intervene as in the last one just described would be, in our view, unjustified. Conversely, in the second case the role of the intermediary does not change the contractually weak position of the consumer vis-à-vis the other contractual (professional) party and is already, in most of the countries, submitted to the same or similar requirements as those imposed to the professional as regards duties and obligations. This is particularly the case in the banking sector. We thus consider option 1 more appropriate. 4.3 The concepts of good faith and fair dealing in the Consumer Acquis 1 See EBF Report on State of integration of Europe s financial markets, page 19 and EBF Report on Green Paper on Financial Services Policy ( ), page 8. 3
5 Question C: Should a horizontal instrument include an overarching duty for professionals to act in accordance with the principles of good faith and fair dealing? The debate within the CFR on any possible provision related to the concept of good faith has shown how difficult it is to find a common ground for the use at EU level of such a concept that has not developed in the same way across national legal systems. We consider more appropriate to avoid the introduction of an overarching provision on good faith in any future horizontal instrument, according to option 2. As the Commission correctly points out, the disadvantage of such a general clause would indeed be that it would not encompass precisely the rights and obligations imposed on each party. In addition, it could be interpreted differently among member states Should however the choice eventually be taken to introduce such a concept, it should at least envisaged for both parties according to option The scope of application of the EU rules on unfair terms Extension of the scope to individually negotiated terms Question D1: To what extent should the discipline of unfair contract terms also cover individually negotiated terms? Community rules should continue to apply exclusively to non-negotiated or pre-formulated clauses according to option 3. Individual contractual agreements should continue to be excluded from the unfairness test, also with a view to encourage consumers to develop their contractual negotiation skills. 4.5 List of unfair terms Question D2: What should be the status of any list of unfair contract terms to be included in a horizontal instrument? For the sake of legal certainty benefiting both consumers and providers, we favour option 3 which would allow to harmonise across Member States the contractual terms that are considered unfair and have to be avoided. Our support to option 3 is given on condition that such a list does not assemble the unfair contract terms of the 27 Member States but only those that are common to all States. A streamlined, mandatory list would have the dual advantage of providing legal certainty and being practical to implement. Failing this, the current indicative list should be maintained (option 1). 4.6 Scope of the unfairness test Question D3: Should the scope of the unfairness test of the directive on unfair terms be extended? The unfairness test should be kept in its present form as described in option 2. We are particularly against any extension of the unfairness test to the adequacy of the price. In a market economy pricing is one of the key areas of private decision-making autonomy and is thus subject primarily to control by competition. Any price control by the courts is therefore to be strongly rejected. 4
6 4.7 Information requirements Question E: What contractual effects should be given to the failure to comply with information requirements in the consumer acquis? While we refer to our answer to question F1 for what regards the distinction between cooling off period and right of withdrawal, with reference to the consequences of the failure to comply with information requirements we consider that the different types of consumer contracts and the various modalities for the conclusion thereof (face-to-face or at distance) may well justify a different regime for the consequences of a breach of the duty to provide pre-contractual information. Then Option 3 maintaining this aspect under the sectoral approach appears to us still the most reasonable. Should this aspect be harmonised also across sectors, then an extension of the period for the exercise of the right to withdraw could be envisaged as mentioned under option 1, provided that legal certainty is preserved. Indeed, we consider that any extension of that kind that might leave the contractual relationship endlessly hostage of a right of withdrawal the start of which could be postponed even years after its conclusion is not acceptable. Indeed, the right of withdrawal would be misused if it served as a remedy to breach of contractual obligations; it is itself an exception to the general contract law principle pacta sunt servanda and should remain confined to this goal, as explained below. 4.8 Right of withdrawal The cooling-off periods Question F1: Should the length of the cooling-off periods be harmonised across the consumer acquis? With respect to the terminology, we would like to draw the Commission s attention on a discrepancy between the legal concepts of cooling-off period and right of withdrawal, and the way the various Directives refer to them as interchangeable concepts. From a legal point of view, while the cooling off period refers to a situation occurring before the conclusion of the contract and can apply during the pre-contractual phase, the right to withdraw from the contract can be exercised only after the latter has been duly signed and concluded. Such a difference is not of a minor importance for legal certainty, in particular in order to establish the consequences of the exercise of any of them vis-à-vis the main and the third parties. In the light of that observation, we first encourage the Commission to review the current directives in order to clear such a legal inconsistency in the (at least English) terminology. Secondly, we would like to remind that the introduction of a right of withdrawal to which the various sectoral Directives make reference regardless the way it is named is per se an exception to the fundamental contractual principle of pacta sunt servanda. The main underlying reason for having introduced a right to withdraw in favour of the consumer is the fact that the latter has been recognised in some circumstances as being the weak party in the contractual relationship who therefore is in the need to have a special protection in the form of a free exit from that relationship in case such a weakness had not allowed the consumer to negotiate the contract on a level playing field with the (professional) counterparty and thus to have agreed to contract on a well-informed basis. The necessity to introduce a right to withdraw for the consumer and the length of such a period during which the consumer is given the chance to change his mind would be in our view more appropriately left within the sectoral directives and not included in a possible horizontal instrument, as proposed under option 3. 5
7 Along the same lines of reasoning, should this element be harmonised, we could envisage to support option 1 only provided that the period for exercising the right of withdrawal is reduced to 7 days, as is the case already in the majority of the existing directives of the Consumer Aquis that grant a right of withdrawal The modalities of exercising the right of withdrawal Question F2: How should the right of withdrawal be exercised? Differently from the length of the withdrawal period, the modalities for its exercise could and should be harmonised across the various sectoral Directives as expressed in option 2, in order to ensure that consumers get used to how to exercise their right and professionals are not indefinitely exposed to the risk that contracts are voided by terms for withdrawing that can be reopened due to claims on incorrect information on modalities. In the view of the overwhelming majority of our members, a model notice of right of withdrawal that would be recognised in all EU member states should be introduced via a horizontal instrument. At the very least, the principle according to which the modalities to exercise the right of withdrawal should be clearly indicated in the contract, might be included in a horizontal instrument and made it harmonised across sectors The contractual effect of withdrawal Question F3: Which costs should be imposed on consumers in the event of withdrawal? We consider that according to the modalities applied, the costs might vary according to the type of contract (from the cost for a simple registered mail to communicate the withdrawal, to the one for sending back a good that was not conform to the contract, to the payment of interests on fund received if any before the withdrawal). Generalising the level of costs for the consumer seems to us unfeasible, since it depends on the type of contract. We thus favour option 3 as regards costs. Furthermore, we would like to underline a distinction between the costs the consumer has to bear if he wants to withdraw, and the reimbursement of any sum he may have received following the valid conclusion of the contract, in particular for the provision of financial services. The obligation of reimbursement of such sums is of course a consequence of the withdrawal and must not be assimilated to the notion of costs of the withdrawal, which would consist in most cases of financial transactions, in payment of interests upon those sums. 4.9 General contractual remedies 2 In particular, we see room for harmonising the formulation in the following meaning: - having the form harmonised, e.g. the written form; - having the type of written form harmonised, e.g. registered letter or other durable medium ensuring certainty of the date of sending and/or receipt - having the statement to be made in a written communication of the intention to withdraw harmonised, e.g. "The underwriter, XX, communicates by the present letter his intention to withdraw..."etc - having all of this inserted in an annex to a horizontal instrument where duration and starting date for the exercise are, for instance, left blank by reference to sectoral directives. In addition, a standard reference to such an annex could also harmonise the way the professional have to inform the consumer at pre-contractual stage about the exercise of such a right, without prejudice to the different periods and specificities due to sectors. 6
8 Question G1: Should the horizontal instrument provide for general contractual remedies available to consumers? The differences between the various consumer contracts and the remedies put in place already by the legislation at national level suggest not trying to harmonise them but to leave them to either sectoral approach or the general contractual remedies in place in any country. Option 1 should then be favoured General right to damages Question G2: Should the horizontal instrument grant consumers a general right to damages for breach of contract? Option 1 seems to us the most appropriate, in the light of the existence, in all countries, of the right to claim damages in case of breach of professional liability. 5. Specific rules applicable to Consumer Sales Due to the sector specific nature of the issues raised under this chapter, EBF will not comment on it. 6. Other Issues Question N: Is/are there any other issue(s) or area(s) that requires to be explored further or addressed at EU level in the context of consumer protection? We would suggest exploring the benefit of harmonising the consequences of the declaration of unfairness of contractual terms, namely the possibility of harmonising the invalidity of such clauses. * * * 7
EBF COMMENTS ON THE EBA CONSULTATION PAPER ON DRAFT IMPLEMENTING TECHNICAL STANDARDS ON DISCLOSURE FOR OWN FUNDS BY INSTITUTIONS
EBF Ref.: D1335F-2012 Brussels, 31 July 2012 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The
More informationD1387D-2012 Brussels, 24 August 2012
D1387D-2012 Brussels, 24 August 2012 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries.
More informationProposal for a regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment Contact person:
Position Paper Insurance Europe comments on the European Commission proposal for a regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment Our reference: Referring to: ECO-LTI-18-033
More informationN 0400 SA. . CESR/CEBS/CEIOPS Brussels, 25 June Dear Sir,
N 0400 SA Email CESR/CEBS/CEIOPS amlfundstransfer@c-ebs.org Brussels, 25 June 2008 Subject: EBF answer to CESR/CEBS/CEIOPS consultation on common understanding of the obligations imposed by European Regulation
More informationCBFA. We hope that the Commission will take into consideration the CBFA's comments in its revision of the proposal. Yours sincerely.
CBFA Prudential Policy- Banks and Insurance BANKING, RAN FINANCE AND INSURANCE COMMISSION European Commission Internal Market and Services DG Mr. Patrick PEARSON Head of Unit Financial Institutions Banking
More informationDirective 2011/7/EU. of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions
Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
More informationResponse to CESR Call for Evidence on Micro-structural issues of the European equity markets
EBF Ref.: D0618E-2010 Brussels, 30 April 2010 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The
More informationDIRECTIVE 2002/47/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral arrangements (OJ L 168, , p.
2002L0047 EN 02.07.2014 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B DIRECTIVE 2002/47/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationShort selling EBF Response to CESR Consultation Paper on a Proposal for a Pan-European Short Selling Disclosure Regime Key Points:
EBF Ref.: D1291D Brussels, 30 September 2009 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The
More informationINTERNAL REGULATIONS PREAMBLE
COUNCIL OF BUREAUX CONSEIL DES BUREAUX INTERNAL REGULATIONS PREAMBLE (1) Whereas in 1949 the Working Party on Road Transport of the Inland Transport Committee of the Economic Commission for Europe of the
More informationResponse to the Joint Committee discussion paper on automation in financial advice. COB-DIS Date: 3 March 2016
Position Paper Response to the Joint Committee discussion paper on automation in financial advice Our reference: Referring to: COB-DIS-16-028 Date: 3 March 2016 Discussion paper by the joint committee
More informationEUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 January 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0054 (COD) PE-CONS 57/10 MI 395 COMPET 304 IND 128 ECO 87 FIN 498 CODEC 1104
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 13 January 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0054 (COD) PE-CONS 57/10 MI 395 COMPET 304 IND 128 ECO 87 FIN 498 CODEC 1104 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS
More informationDelegations will find attached a Presidency compromise on the above Commission proposal, following the meeting of 13 November.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 18 November 2009 Interinstitutional File: 2009/0132 (COD) 15911/09 EF 168 ECOFIN 789 DRS 68 CODEC 1303 NOTE from: to: Subject: Presidency Delegations Proposal for
More informationGREEN PAPER FROM THE COMMISSION. on policy options for progress towards a European Contract Law for consumers and businesses
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 1.7.2010 COM(2010)348 final GREEN PAPER FROM THE COMMISSION on policy options for progress towards a European Contract Law for consumers and businesses EN EN GREEN
More informationSubject: Proposed Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive
EBF_021164 20 May 2016 Commissioner Pierre MOSCOVICI Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs European Commission Email: cab-moscovici-webpage@ec.europa.eu Dear Commissioner, Subject: Proposed
More informationINTERNAL REGULATIONS
COUNCIL OF BUREAUX CONSEIL DES BUREAUX INTERNAL REGULATIONS Preamble (1) Whereas in 1949 the Working Party on Road Transport of the Inland Transport Committee of the Economic Commission for Europe of the
More informationSecretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 19 March 2014 (OR. en) 7859/14 JUSTCIV 70 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 12 March 2014 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: Secretary-General of the European Commission,
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on a Common European Sales Law. {SEC(2011) 1165 final} {SEC(2011) 1166 final}
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.10.2011 COM(2011) 635 final 2011/0284 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on a Common European Sales Law {SEC(2011) 1165 final}
More informationEFAMA s position paper on securitisation
EFAMA s position paper on securitisation Executive summary EFAMA 1 is strongly supportive of the efforts deployed by the Commission towards restoring economic growth in Europe. We consider that the development
More informationto the CESR s technical advice on the European commission on the level 2 measures related to the UCITS management company passport CESR/09.
Paris, 10 th September 2009 Response of the French Banking Federation (FBF- Fédération Bancaire Française) and French Association of Securities Professionals (AFTI - Association Française des Professionnels
More informationDEUTSCHER DERIVATE VERBAND DDV. And EUROPEAN STRUCTURED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION EUSIPA. Joint Position Paper. on the
DEUTSCHER DERIVATE VERBAND DDV And EUROPEAN STRUCTURED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION EUSIPA Joint Position Paper on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key
More information16523/12 OM/mf 1 DGG 1
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 13 December 2012 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0296 (COD) 2011/0298 (COD) 16523/12 EF 270 ECOFIN 970 CODEC 2743 "I" ITEM NOTE from: to: Subject: Presidency Coreper
More informationEBF position on the inclusion of financial services in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations
Chief Executive KK Ref.: EBF_002430 Brussels, 7 June 2013 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation (EBF) is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association
More informationEFAMA reply to the EU Commission's consultation on EMIR REFIT
EFAMA reply to the EU Commission's consultation on EMIR REFIT EFAMA 1 welcomes the opportunity to comment on the EU Commission's proposed EMIR refit. We want to congratulate the EU Commission for the excellent
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 13.10.2008 COM(2008) 640 final 2008/0194 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on cross-border payments
More information5 November 2012 EBA/Op/2012/03
Floor 18 Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ United Kingdom t +44 (0)20 7382 1770 f +44 (0)20 7382 1771 www.eba.europa.eu THE CHAIRPERSON +44(0)20 7382 1765 direct andrea.enria@eba.europa.eu Commissioner
More informationPublic Consultation on Responsible Lending and Borrowing in the EU
date: 28 August 2009 e-mail: paul.broadhead@bsa.org.uk direct line: 020 7520 5917 direct fax: 020 7240 5290 European Commission DG Internal Market Rue de la Loi 200 1049 Brussels Belgium Dear Sir/Madam
More informationINCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT AP NUMBER LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Re-launch of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) DG TAXUD.D DATE OF ROADMAP
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof,
L 244/12 COMMISSION IMPLEMTING REGULATION (EU) No 897/2014 of 18 August 2014 laying down specific provisions for the implementation of cross-border cooperation programmes financed under Regulation (EU)
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, xxx COM(2005) yyy final 2005/aaaa (COD) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on improving the portability of supplementary
More informationConsultation Paper Review of Article 26 of RTS No 153/2013 with respect to MPOR for client accounts
Consultation Paper Review of Article 26 of RTS No 153/2013 with respect to MPOR for client accounts 14 December 2015 ESMA/2015/1867 Date: 14 December 2015 ESMA/2015/1867 Responding to this paper The European
More informationThe Commission s Study on Company
HOME STATE TAXATION VS. COMMON BASE TAXATION jurisdictions by an automatic formula, and taxed at the national tax rates, which member states will continue to establish themselves. A comprehensive solution
More informationEUROPEANISSUERS COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL OF A DIRECTIVE AMENDING THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE AND BACKGROUND DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
EUROPEANISSUERS COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL OF A DIRECTIVE AMENDING THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE AND BACKGROUND DOCUMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Position 12 March 2009 EuropeanIssuers fully support this initiative
More informationThe UCITS Directive Consolidated to reflect UCITS V changes. (as at October 2014)
The UCITS Directive Consolidated to reflect UCITS V changes (as at October 2014) Important Information Although we have taken care to ensure that this document is as accurate as possible, this text is
More informationJoint Response to EBA consultation Paper (CP 51) Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting Requirements for large Exposures
D0425F-2012 26 March 2012 Joint Response to EBA consultation Paper (CP 51) Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting Requirements for large Exposures Key Points The first time adoption of the ITS should be, at
More informationSUMMARY OF THE LEUVEN BRAINSTORMING EVENT ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS 29 JUNE 2007
SUMMARY OF THE LEUVEN BRAINSTORMING EVENT ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS 29 JUNE 2007 COLLECTING THOUGHTS AND EXPERIENCES ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS The event was opened by Commissioner Meglena Kuneva who gave a key-note
More informationESBG response to the CESR call for evidence: Implementing measures on the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
ESBG response to the CESR call for evidence: Implementing measures on the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive European Savings Banks Group Register ID 8765978796-80 January 2011 DOC 1449/10
More informationEBF comments on ESMA guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements
EV EBF Ref.: D0223D-2012 Brussels, 24 February 2012 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 7.1.2004 COM(2003) 830 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION on guidance to assist Member States in the implementation of the criteria listed in Annex
More informationResponse to Ofcom s consultation on price rises in fixed term contracts
Response to Ofcom s consultation on price rises in fixed term contracts 14 March 2013 Price rises in fixed term contracts Ombudsman Services consultation response 1 Summary 1.1 About Ombudsman Services
More informationEBF Comments on the Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Financial Statements Presentation
EBF ref. N 0166 Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board Brussels, 7 April 2009 Subject: EBF Comments on the Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Financial Statements Presentation
More informationDeutsche Börse Group
Deutsche Börse Group Response to the European Commission s Green Paper on Financial Services Policy (2005-2010) COM (2005) 177 1 A. Introduction Deutsche Börse Group welcomes the opportunity to respond
More informationThe application of the Mutual Recognition Regulation to non-ce marked construction products
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Guidance document 1 Brussels, 13.10.2011 - The application of the Mutual Recognition Regulation to non-ce marked construction products
More informationEBF Response to EBA Consultation on draft ITS amending ITS on supervisory reporting on Liquidity Coverage Ratio (EBA/CP/2014/45)
EBF_0125713v5 The European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector, uniting 32 national banking associations in Europe that together represent some 4,500 banks - large and small,
More informationTHE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS
THE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS Date : 29 June Ref : CESR/04-323 Formal Request for Technical Advice on Possible Implementing Measures on the Directive on Markets in Financial Instruments
More informationGuide to Financial Issues relating to ICT PSP Grant Agreements
DG COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CONTENT AND TECHNOLOGY ICT Policy Support Programme Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme Guide to Financial Issues relating to ICT PSP Grant Agreements Version
More informationAUDIT CERTIFICATE GUIDANCE NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
AUDIT CERTIFICATE GUIDANCE NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME WORKING NOTES FOR CONTRACTORS AND CERTIFYING ENTITIES MATERIALS PREPARED BY INTERDEPARTMENTAL AUDIT CERTIFICATE WORKING GROUP/ COORDINATION GROUP
More information(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
11.12.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 327/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2010/73/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 24 November 2010 amending Directives 2003/71/EC
More informationResponse to the CESR consultation on technical advice to the European Commission on possible measures concerning Credit Rating Agencies
Fédération Bancaire Européenne European Banking Federation Le Secrétaire Général COK No 0066 Fabrice Demarigny Secretary General Committee of European Securities Regulators 11-13, avenue de Friedland F
More informationLeaseurope response to the consultation paper on CEBS s technical advice to the European Commission on options and national discretions (CP18)
Kerstin af Jochnick Chair Committee of European Banking Supervisors By email cp18@c-ebs.org Brussels, 15 August 2008 Leaseurope response to the consultation paper on CEBS s technical advice to the European
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2004R0809 EN 01.03.2007 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 809/2004 of 29
More informationFinancial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS. Dear sir / madam. Payment systems regulation call for inputs
Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS Dear sir / madam Payment systems regulation call for inputs We appreciate the opportunity to respond to this consultation.
More informationT2S Special Series I Issue No 1 I April 2012 I T2S benefits: much more than fee reductions
T2S Special Series I Issue No 1 I April 2012 I T2S benefits: much more than fee reductions T2S Special Series Issue No 3 January 2014 Corporate actions in T2S Author: Rosen Ivanov, T2S Programme Office,
More informationFinal Report Draft regulatory technical standards on indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR
Final Report Draft regulatory technical standards on indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR 26 May 2016 ESMA/2016/725 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 3 2 Indirect clearing arrangements...
More informationComments to the Draft Resolution on TTIP negotiations
POSITION PAPER February 2015 Comments to the Draft Resolution on TTIP negotiations TTIP- Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is a unique opportunity for the EU and US to give the world a strong
More informationABN AMRO response to DG Competition Issues Paper on Competition in EU Securities Trading and Post-Trading
European Union Affairs & Market Infrastructures, Securities ABN AMRO EU Liaison Office Rue de la Chancellerie 17 A B 1000 Brussels Contact: Anne Pouchous Telephone: +.32.2.546.03.65 E-mail: anne.pouchous@be.abnamro.com
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2009R0924 EN 31.03.2012 001.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION (EC) No 924/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationTHE ESTONIAN MINISTRY OF FINANCE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION INTERNAL MARKET AND SERVICES DG B-1049 BRUSSEL BELGIUM November, 15th, 2005 THE RESPONSE BY THE ESTONIAN MINISTRY OF FINANCE TO THE GREEN PAPER ON THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE EU FRAMEWORK
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. A Roadmap towards a Banking Union
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.9.2012 COM(2012) 510 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL A Roadmap towards a Banking Union EN EN COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
More informationEBF Comment Letter on the IASB Exposure Draft - Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
Chief Executive DM/MT Ref.:EBF_001692 Mr Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: hhoogervorst@ifrs.org Brussels, 5 July
More informationEUROPEAN PARLIAMENT C5-0534/2002. Common position. Session document 2000/0260(COD) 19/11/2002
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 Session document 2004 C5-0534/2002 2000/0260(COD) EN 19/11/2002 Common position with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the
More informationFEFSI COMMENTS ON. Fourthly, collective portfolio managers that offer as a non-core activity investment advice under the ISD;
FEFSI COMMENTS ON CESR S CALL FOR EVIDENCE (II) ON THE FORMAL REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTING MEASURES ON THE FIM DIRECTIVE The European investment management industry, represented
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.11.2016 COM(2016) 721 final 2016/0351 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against
More informationEACB Comments. On the Commission working paper on SEPA migration end date
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken EACB Comments On the Commission working paper on SEPA migration
More informationAN ASSOCIATION ON THE MOVE
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken Sent to: markt-consult-substiprod@ec.europa.eu EACB Answer to the
More information(Norway) HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2, in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,
Case No: 67392 Event No: 521277 Dec. No: 538/09/COL EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION of 16 December 2009 to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 1(2) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance
More informationResponse of the European Financial Services Round Table to the consultation of the European Commission on the Green Paper on Financial Services
Response of the European Financial Services Round Table to the consultation of the European Commission on the Green Paper on Financial Services Policy (2005 2010) COM(2005) 177 29 July 2005 The 20 Members
More informationKey Points. Ref.:EBF_007865E. Brussels, 09 May 2014
Ref. Ares(2014)1500722-12/05/2014 Ref.:EBF_007865E Brussels, 09 May 2014 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European
More informationEACH response European Commission public consultation on Building a Capital Markets Union
12 th May 2015 EACH response European Commission public consultation on Building a Capital Markets Union 1. Introduction The European Association of CCP Clearing Houses (EACH) represents the interests
More informationEBF POSITION ON THE REVIEW OF THE MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE
EBF Ref.D2000D-2011 Brussels, 19 December 2011 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association
More informationGeneral Remarks. Example 1:
Brussels, 14August 2013 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries. The EBF represents
More informationNOTE FOR THE FILE. Report of the meeting organised by DG External Trade with dual use exporters - Brussels, 26/01/2007- Operational conclusions
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for External Trade Directorate F - WTO Affairs, OECD and Food-related Sectors WTO, OECD and Dual Use Brussels, 05/02/2007 Trade/F/1/FH D(07) 1072 NOTE FOR THE FILE
More informationThe Optional Application of the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law
ERA Forum (2008) 9:S111 S117 DOI 10.1007/s12027-008-0069-0 Article The Optional Application of the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law Published online: 22 August 2008 The Author(s) 2008 1. Introduction
More informationEuropean Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
Brussels, 21 March 2013 EACB draft position paper on EBA discussion paper on retail deposits subject to higher outflows for the purposes of liquidity reporting under the CRR The voice of 3.800 local and
More informationEuropean Commission Green Paper on options for European Contract Law COM (2010) 348
European Commission Green Paper on options for European Contract Law COM (2010) 348 ICC Views of the International Chamber of Commerce by its Commission on Commercial Law and Practice (CLP) ICC represents
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 17.07.1998 COM(1998) 451 final 98/ 0242 (COD) Proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE AMENDING DIRECTIVE 85/611/EEC ON THE COORDINATION
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.5.2012 SWD(2012) 128 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Guidelines on the application of Directive 2008/48/EC (Consumer Credit Directive) in relation to costs and the
More informationCP19/15: Contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law
Andrew Hoffman and Leanne Ingledew Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Cp19_15@bankofengland.co.uk 14 th August 2015 Dear Leanne and Andrew, CP19/15: Contractual stays in financial
More informationEBA FINAL draft implementing technical standards
EBA/ITS/2013/05 13 December 2013 EBA FINAL draft implementing technical standards on passport notifications under Articles 35, 36 and 39 of Directive 2013/36/EU EBA FINAL draft implementing technical standards
More informationFramework for the assessment of Securities Settlement Systems and links to determine their eligibility for use in Eurosystem Credit Operations 1
EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK Framework for the assessment of Securities Settlement Systems January 2014 Framework for the assessment of Securities Settlement Systems and links to determine their eligibility for
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 15 December 2016, in the following composition: Thomas Grimm (Switzerland), Deputy Chairman John Bramhall (England), member
More informationTechnical Advice on Conflicts of Interest in direct and intermediated sales of insurance-based investment products
EIOPA-15/135 30 January 2015 Technical Advice on Conflicts of Interest in direct and intermediated sales of insurance-based investment products 1/30 Table of Contents Executive Summary...3 1. Introduction...3
More informationHow the Post-Cotonou Agreement can support EU investment and private sector development in ACP countries
27 April 2018 How the Post-Cotonou Agreement can support EU investment and private sector development in ACP countries Following the European Commission s recommendation for a Council Decision authorising
More informationBrexit CCP Location and Legal Uncertainty
August 2017 Brexit CCP Location and Legal Uncertainty The UK s withdrawal from the European Union (EU), set for March 2019, is now little more than 18 months away. Negotiations between the UK government
More information2
Valdis Dombrovskis Vice-President European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 1049, Brussels Belgium Brussels, 17 March 2017 Subject: Public consultation on the CMU mid-term review 2017 Dear Vice-President,
More informationRÉPONSE À LA CONSULTATION SUR LES DÉPOSITAIRES CENTRAUX DE TITRES (CSD)
Commission BIM du 23 Mars 2011 VI.3 RÉPONSE À LA CONSULTATION SUR LES DÉPOSITAIRES CENTRAUX DE TITRES (CSD) Document Paris, 1st March 2011 Consultation paper of the European Commission on CSDs and harmonisation
More informationResponse to CESR Consultation Paper on its draft technical advice to the European Commission in the context of the MiFID review equity markets
EBF Ref.: D0678E-2010 Brussels, 31 May 2010 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The
More informationFirst Progress Report on Supervisory Convergence in the Field of Insurance and Occupational Pensions for the Financial Services Committee (FSC)
CEIOPS-SEC-70/05 September 2005 First Progress Report on Supervisory Convergence in the Field of Insurance and Occupational Pensions for the Financial Services Committee (FSC) - 1 - Executive Summary Following
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration EU VAT FORUM
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Tax Tax administration administration and and fight fight against against tax tax fraud fraud
More informationEuropean Union Pension Directive
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Law Firms Key Workplace Documents June 2003 European Union Pension Directive The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Follow this and
More informationSecretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 10 April 2014 (OR. en) 8847/14 Interinstitutional File: 2014/0121 (COD) DRS 53 CODEC 1090 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 10 April 2014 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject:
More informationInsurance Europe concerns over the ESAs PRIIPs final draft RTS. COB-PRI Date: 18 May 2016
Technical Paper Insurance Europe concerns over the ESAs PRIIPs final draft RTS Our reference: Referring to: Related documents: Contact persons: COB-PRI-16-039 Date: 18 May 2016 Joint Committee Final Draft
More informationMr Wim Moeliker Committee of European Securities Regulators 11-13, avenue de Friedland F Paris
FEDERATION BANCAIRE DE L UNION EUROPEENNE Mr Elias Kazarian Kaiserstrasse 29 D-60311 Frankfurt am Main Germany Ecb.secretariat@ecb.int Le Secrétaire Général BI/AB C1232 Mr Wim Moeliker Committee of European
More information***II POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Consolidated legislative document 14 May 2002 1998/0245(COD) PE2 ***II POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT adopted at second reading on 14 May 2002 with a view to the adoption
More informationDelegations will find below the fourth Presidency compromise on the abovementioned proposal.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 September 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2012/0175 (COD) 13635/14 ECOFIN 851 CODEC 1888 SURE 33 EF 241 NOTE From: To: Subject: Presidency Delegations
More informationAdvice to the European Commission on the review of the Financial Conglomerates Directive 1
30th October 2009 Advice to the European Commission on the review of the Financial Conglomerates Directive 1 1 Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on
More informationAUDIT CERTIFICATE WORKING NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
AUDIT CERTIFICATE WORKING NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME WORKING NOTES FOR CONTRACTORS AND CERTIFYING ENTITIES MATERIALS PREPARED BY INTERDEPARTMENTAL AUDIT CERTIFICATE WORKING GROUP VERSION 1 APPROVED
More informationEFAMA COMMENTS ON CONSULTATION PAPER : EIOPA s Advice on the Development of an EU Single Market for Personal Pension Products (PPP)
EFAMA COMMENTS ON CONSULTATION PAPER : EIOPA s Advice on the Development of an EU Single Market for Personal Pension Products (PPP) GENERAL COMMENT EFAMA welcomes EIOPA s consultation and the opportunity
More informationEBF response to EBA consultation on homogeneity of underlying assets
15/03/2018 EBF response to EBA consultation on homogeneity of underlying assets Key points: Well established securitisations considered as high-quality under current market practices must be preserved
More informationRevised 1 Guidance Note on Financial Engineering Instruments under Article 44 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
REVISED VERSION 08/02/2012 COCOF_10-0014-05-EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Revised 1 Guidance Note on Financial Engineering Instruments under Article 44 of Council Regulation
More information