Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 131
|
|
- Amie Randall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 131 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 2:16cr6 ANTHONY L. BURFOOT DEFENDANT ANTHONY L. BURFOOT S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DIMISS COUNT TWO ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE WIRE COMMUNICATION ALLEGED WAS NOT IN FURTHERANCE OF THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD COMES NOW the defendant, Anthony L. Burfoot, by counsel, and as and for his brief In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Count Two On The Grounds That The Wire Communication Alleged Was Not In Furtherance Of The Scheme To Defraud, respectfully states as follows: INTRODUCTION Count Two of the Indictment seeks to charge the use of an interstate wire communication to further a scheme to defraud the citizens of the City of Norfolk of their right to honest services, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section This is also known as honest-services wire fraud. The defendant respectfully submits that Count Two fails to charge an offense as a matter of law, on the grounds that the wire communication comprising the alleged violation of law in Count Two (1) on the face of Count Two was factually not in furtherance of the alleged scheme to defraud; and (2) could also legally not be in furtherance of the scheme to defraud because the wire communication was legally compelled, by the Virginia Constitution and state and local law. ARGUMENT A. The wire communication alleged in Count Two on the face of the Count was factually not in furtherance of the alleged scheme to defraud. 1
2 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 2 of 9 PageID# 132 Count Two alleges a wire communication to further a scheme to defraud the citizens of Norfolk of their right to honest services, in pertinent part, as follows: 3. On or about February 14, 2011, for the purposes of executing the aforesaid scheme and artifice, ANTHONY L. BURFOOT transmitted and caused to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds, that is: DE used his sister s credit card to pay delinquent taxes, such payment causing the transmission of a wire communication in interstate commerce. Indictment, Count TWO, Paragraph 3, p. 22 (emphasis added). In United States v. Wynn, 684 F.3d 473, 477 (4 th Cir. 2012), the Court noted that: to convict a person of mail fraud or wire fraud, the government must show that the defendant (1) devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud and (2) used the mail or wire communications in furtherance of the scheme. (emphasis added). The defendant respectfully submits that the Indictment, on its face, in Count Two, demonstrates that the defendant did not use a wire communication in furtherance of the scheme. Guidance on this issue can be found from the treatment of the analogous mail fraud statute in United States v. Hancock, 512 Fed. Appx. 266, 268 (4 th Cir. 2013)(unpublished). In that case, the Fourth Circuit noted that: In Parr v. United States, the Supreme Court espoused that [t]he federal mail fraud statute does not purport to reach all frauds, but only those limited instances in which the use of the mails is a part of the execution of the fraud. 363 U.S. 370, , 80 S. Ct. 1171, 4 L. Ed. 2d 1277 (1960) (quoting Kann v. United States, 323 U.S. 88, 95, 65 S. Ct. 189 L. Ed. 88 (1944)). Citing Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989), however, the Hancock Court did note that a mail (or wire) communication can be a part of the scheme to defraud where: 2
3 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 3 of 9 PageID# 133 the mailings are incidental to an essential part of the scheme. Id. [Schmuck] at 712 (quoting Pereira v. United States, 374 U.S. 1, 8, 74 S. Ct. 358, 98 L. Ed. 435 (1954)). In the instant case, in Count One, the Indictment alleges a conspiracy between the defendant and others, including Dwight Etheridge ( DE ) to commit honest-services wire fraud, as follows: From in or about 2005 through in or about February 2011, in the Eastern District of Virginia, defendant ANTHONY L. BURFOOT knowingly and intentionally conspired with other persons known and unknown to commit wire fraud, that is: having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud the citizens of the City of Norfolk of their right to the honest services of a Norfolk Councilman through bribery, to transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds for the purpose of execution of such scheme and artifice, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section Indictment, COUNT ONE, Paragraph 2, p. 20. Count One further specifies that in exchange for the receipt of personal things of value from Dwight Etheridge (and others), as a Councilman, the defendant engaged in official acts on behalf of Tivest (Etheridge s company) by voting to approve ordinances helpful to Tivest and by influencing the Norfolk and Redevelopment and Housing Authority ( NRHA ) on behalf of Tivest. Indictment, COUNT ONE, Paragraphs 4.a.,c., p. 21. Notably, the wire fraud conspiracy does not allege any official acts by the defendant on behalf of Tivest in the defendant s then-concurrent position as a Deputy City Treasurer. The only official acts alleged in support of the wire fraud conspiracy are acts by the defendant as a Councilman. While Count One charges the defendant with conspiracy to commit hones-services wire fraud, Count Two charges the defendant with the substantive commission of that 3
4 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 4 of 9 PageID# 134 offense. Count Two specifically charges that, on February 14, 2011, while defendant was a Deputy City Treasurer (see Indictment, GENERAL ALLEGATIONS, Paragraph 3, p. 2.), the defendant transmitted and caused to be transmitted an interstate wire communication when Dwight Etheridge used his sister s credit card to pay delinquent taxes causing an interstate wire communication. Indictment, COUNT TWO, Paragraph 3, p. 22. Dwight Etheridge s payment of a delinquent tax bill to the City Treasurer s Office where defendant was a Deputy, however, as a matter of fact is not the use of a wire communication in furtherance of the scheme outlined in the Indictment. The Indictment alleges a scheme by the defendant to be bribed by Dwight Etheridge and Tivest in exchange for votes as a City Councilman and for influence with NRHA as a City Councilman, not in exchange for receipt of delinquent tax payments. The Indictment on its face excludes a delinquent tax payment by Dwight Etheridge from the scope of the scheme. The wire communication generated by the credit card payment could not be said as a matter of fact to be incidental to an essential part of the scheme because receipt of delinquent tax payments in exchange for things of value was not even a part of the scheme, much less an essential part of the scheme. B. In the alternative, the use of the wires element is not met as a matter of law because the wire was part of a legally compelled act by both the Constitution of Virginia and state and local law. In addition to factually not being in furtherance of the honest-services Indictment scheme on the face of Count Two, as set forth in the Indictment and urged above, the wire communication in Count Two is also insufficient as a matter of law because the wire was a part of a legally compelled act and for this reason also could not be in furtherance of the scheme. 4
5 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 5 of 9 PageID# 135 In Parr v. United States, supra, 363 U.S. at 391, cited with approval in Hancock, supra, 512 Fed. Appx. at 269, the Supreme Court reversed mail fraud convictions of certain public officials and a private banker involving the theft and misappropriation of public school taxpayer- paid monies after the taxes were assessed by the mails and paid by taxpayers by mail, which mailings were in accordance with mandated state law. The Supreme Court noted the question presented as follows: The crucial question, respecting Counts 1 through 16 of the indictment, then comes down to whether the legally compelled mailings of the lawful or, more properly, what are not charged or shown to have been unlawful letters, tax statements, checks and receipts, complained of in those counts, properly may be said to have been for the purpose of executing a scheme to defraud because those legally compelled to cause and causing those mailings planned to steal an indefinite part of the receipts. Parr, supra, 363 U.S. at 389 (emphasis added). In addressing this question, the Supreme Court again noted the limitations on the mail fraud statute: Thus, as its terms and purpose make clear, "[t]he federal mail fraud statute does not purport to reach all frauds, but only those limited instances in which the use of the mails is a part of the execution of the fraud, leaving all other cases to be dealt with by appropriate state law." Kann v. United States, 323 U.S. 88, 95. Therefore, only if the mailings were "a part of the execution of the fraud," or, as we said in Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1,8, were "incident to an essential part of the scheme," do they fall within the ban of the federal mail fraud statute. Parr, supra, 363 U.S. at The Court found significant that the Government cites no case holding that the mailing of a thing which the law required to be mailed may be regarded as mailed for the purpose of executing a plot or scheme to defraud. Id. at 390 (emphasis added). 5
6 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 6 of 9 PageID# 136 The Court ultimately held as follows: But in the light of the particular circumstances of this case, and especially of the facts (1) that the School Board was legally required to assess and collect taxes, (2) that the indictment did not charge nor the proofs show that the taxes assessed and collected were in excess of the District's needs or that they were "padded" or in any way unlawful, (3) that no such issue was submitted to, nor, hence, determined by, the jury, (4) that the Board was compelled to collect and receipt for the taxes by state law, which, in the circumstances here, compelled it to use and cause (here, principally by permitting) the use of the mails for those purposes, we must conclude that the legally compelled mailings, complained of in the first 16 counts of the indictment, were not shown to have been unlawful "step[s] in a plot," Badders v. United States, supra, 240 U.S. at 394, "part[s] of the execution of the fraud," Kann v. United States, supra, 323 U.S. at 95, "incident to an essential part of the scheme," Pereira v. United States, supra, 347 U.S. at 8, or to have been made "for the purpose of executing such scheme," within the meaning of 1341, for we think it cannot be said that mailings made or caused to be made under the imperative command of duty imposed by state law are criminal under the federal mail fraud statute, even though some of those who are so required to do the mailing for the District plan to steal, when or after received, some indefinite part of its moneys. Id. at 391 (emphasis added). Like the school district in Parr, the Norfolk City Treasurer and his employees are legally required and compelled to collect delinquent taxes, thereby compelling that office to use, inter alia, the mails and/or wires to do so. Like the taxpayers in Parr, supra, Dwight Etheridge was legally required and compelled to pay local taxes to the Norfolk City Treasurer, both individually and in a corporate capacity, thereby again compelling him to use, inter alia, the mails and/or wires. Accordingly, just as the legally compelled use of the mails in the Parr, supra case could not as a matter of law be for the purpose of executing the scheme to defraud, so is the legally compelled wire communication in Count Two as a matter of law not for the purpose of executing the honest-services scheme to defraud either. 6
7 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 7 of 9 PageID# 137 The compelled legal authority for the required payment to and collection by the Norfolk City Treasurer of delinquent taxes by Dwight Etheridge is manifest. First, the general taxation authority is found in the Constitution of Virginia, Article X, Section 1, which states that, All property, except as hereinafter provided shall be taxed. All taxes shall be levied and collected under general laws The Constitution of Virginia further commits to local taxation, such as by the City of Norfolk, certain property, as follows: Real estate, coal and other mineral lands, and tangible personal property are hereby segregated for, and made subject to, local taxation only, and shall be assessed for local taxation in such manner and at such times as the General Assembly may prescribe by general law. Accord Code of Virginia Section ( All taxable real estate and all tangible personal property are hereby segregated and made subject to local taxation only. ). Virginia Code Section mandates that the City Treasurer shall be responsible for the receipt of such locally taxed property, stating, in pertinent part, that: A. Each treasurer shall receive the state revenue and the levies and other amounts payable into the treasury of the political subdivision of the Commonwealth served by the treasurer. Finally, as to delinquent taxes, such as those owed and payable by Dwight Etheridge as identified as the subject of the wire communication in Count Two, Virginia Code Section legally compels the City Treasurer to collect and receive such delinquent taxes, directing, in pertinent part, as follows: The treasurer, after the due date of any tax or other charge collected by such treasurer, shall call upon each person chargeable with such tax or other charge who has not paid the same prior to that time, or upon the agent, if any, of such person resident within the county, city or town for payment thereof; and upon failure or refusal of such person or agent 7
8 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 8 of 9 PageID# 138 (emphasis added). to pay the same he shall proceed to collect by distress or otherwise. Thus, just as the positive law of the State of Texas legally compelled the tax-related mailings in Parr, supra, and thereby excluded them from serving as mailings in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme, so did the positive law of the Commonwealth of Virginia legally compel the delinquent tax payment by Dwight Etheridge to the Norfolk City Treasurer under Count Two and similarly exclude it from serving as a wire communication in furtherance of a scheme to defraud. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the defendant respectfully submits that the wire communication underlying Count Two as a matter of fact on the face of the Count cannot serve as a wire communication in furtherance of the alleged scheme to defraud. In the alternative, as a matter of law, such legally compelled wire cannot serve as a wire in furtherance of a scheme to defraud as well. Andrew M. Sacks, Esquire, VSB#: Stanley E. Sacks, Esquire, VSB# Attorneys for defendant Anthony L. Burfoot SACKS & SACKS, P.C. Town Point Center 150 Boush Street, Suite 501 Norfolk, VA Telephone: (757) Facsimile: (757) andrewsacks@lawfirmofsacksandsacks.com ANTHONY L. BURFOOT By: /s/ Of counsel CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 8
9 Case 2:16-cr HCM-DEM Document 36 Filed 03/02/16 Page 9 of 9 PageID# 139 I hereby certify that on this 2 nd day of March, 2016, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will then send a notification of such filing (NEF) to: Melissa E.O Boyle, Esquire Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney s Office 101 West Main Street, Suite 8000 Norfolk, Virginia Phone: (757) Fax: (757) Melissa.OBoyle@usdoj.gov /s/ Andrew M. Sacks, Esquire Andrew M. Sacks, Esquire, VSB#: Stanley E. Sacks, Esquire, VSB# Attorneys for defendant Anthony L. Burfoot SACKS & SACKS, P.C. Town Point Center 150 Boush Street, Suite 501 Norfolk, VA Telephone: (757) Facsimile: (757) andrewsacks@lawfirmofsacksandsacks.com F:\IC\BURFOOT Anthony\BRIEF.MOT 6.DismissCountTwo docx 9
Case 1:13-cr CMH Document 12 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39
Case 1:13-cr-00366-CMH Document 12 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39 fluto** ' FILED IN OPEN COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SEP I 9 2013 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLERK. US nislrict
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION UNITEDSTATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. ) 3:05-CR-00202-REP-1 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES DOMINIC YYY, ) ) Defendant.
More informationCase 1:18-cr LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cr-00016-LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL NO. i.., Plaintiff, A 18
More information2G17 SEP 2 6 Prl 3 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,('--,,; _.._ "9RIMINAL NO. 3:17CFJ:lj._J_/ftfn
Case 3:17-cr-00220-JAM Document 14 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT FILED N-16-2 2G17 SEP 2 6 Prl 3 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,('--,,; _.._ "9RIMINAL NO.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * ******* SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
MWC:USAO# 2013R00394 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL WESTBROOK, ANTHONY SIMPSON, and BENJAMIN BLAND Defendants * * * * * * * * * * *******
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) INFORMATION ) Plaintiff, ) (18 U.S.C. 371) ) (18 U.S.C. 1957) v. ) ) BRETT A. THIELEN, ) ) Defendant. ) THE UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (TOPEKA DOCKET)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (TOPEKA DOCKET) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. ) ERIC M. RABICOFF, ) Ct. 1: 18 U.S.C. 371 JASON L. RABICOFF,
More informationCase 2:12-cr WHW Document 1 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1
- \ DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. V. : Cr im. No. Case 2:12-cr-00026-WHW Document 1 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1 agency of the United States.
More informationCase 1:17-cr AT-CMS Document 7 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:17-cr-00229-AT-CMS Document 7 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 18 ORIGINAL FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C, Atlanta SEP 2 8 2017 i IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA
More informationCase 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case 3:12-cr-00108-HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 FILED24 APR J 1312;18HSTIC ljrp IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES
More informationCase 5:09-cr D Document 1 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 8
DAB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. I N D I C T MEN T SCOTT ARTHUR WADDELL The Grand Jury charges that: INTRODUCTION
More informationCase 3:13-cr AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'"
Case 3:13-cr-00095-AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ~,.... i.. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'" ZOI3 HAY 21 P 4: 08.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JANELL ROBINSON : : : : : : : Hon. Criminal No. 18-18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C), 1341, 1346, 1349, 1951(a) and 2; and 28 U.S.C.
More informationus OJ $TRICT COUR-1 RIO/\
Case 6:16-cr-00178-RBD-TBS Document 1 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTZUI& SEP I 3 PH ~: 28 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION us
More informationCase 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62
Case 2:13-cr-00495-ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GIUSEPPE GIUDICE, a/k/a "Joe Giudice," and TERESA
More informationTHE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:
SEALED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~atdl'J.ct11tofed SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Oll6t HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PEGGY ANN FULFORD a/k/a PEGGY KING, PEGGY WILLIAMS, PEGGYBARARD,
More informationCOUNT ONE (The Tax Shelter Fraud Conspiracy) Background
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : -v- : FELONY INFORMATION DOMENICK DEGIORGIO, : 05 Cr.
More informationAMENDED BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION
KARIM GHANEM, vs. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1860 Lower Tribunal No: 4D03-743 AMENDED BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION [PETITION FOR WRIT
More informationCase 3:15-cr JRS Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 3:15-cr-00163-JRS Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MORRIS CEPHAS, SR., CHIROY A CEPHAS, a.k.a. Chiroya Screen, and, CEPHAS INDUSTRIES, INC., IN THE UNITED
More informationCase 3:13-cr DMS Document 36 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cr-0-dms Document Filed 0/0/ Page of LAURA E DUFFY United States Attorney SHANE HARRIGAN Assistant U.S. Attorney California Bar No.: Office of the U.S. Attorney 0 Front Street, Room San Diego, CA
More informationCase 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION
Case 2:18-cr-00349-JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 ALB:CPK:DEZ/TTF F.#2011R01958 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X FILED,, ^ IN CLERK'S OFFICE U.S. DISTRICT
More informationCase 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION
Case 4:15-cr-00086-WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INDICTMENT NO. 14P'( ti -I Ali 0W.
More informationCase 1:10-cr REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:10-cr-00317-REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 Criminal Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Plaintiff, 1.
More informationCase 1:14-cr JEI Document 28 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THEDISTRICTOFNEW JERSEY
KtGtl 'V c.u Case 1:14-cr-00263-JEI Document 28 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 105 MAY 9-2014.tJ,T 8:30_ --- -- --- - W!LLIAI\Jl.- vvi'\lsr!, :... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THEDISTRICTOFNEW
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * ****** INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Wire Fraud)
TLF:2016R00326 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. (Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1343, False use of Passport, 18 U.S.C. 1543, Aiding
More informationCase 3:17-cr HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27
Case 3:17-cr-00083-HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR M.
More informationINTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment: 1. The defendants MATTHEW BURSTEIN, ELIAS COMPRES,
DAS/LM:AAS F.#2010R01348 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - against - MATTHEW BURSTEIN, ELIAS COMPRES, JOHN CONSTANTANIDES,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. Plaintiff, COUNT ONE [Both Defendants] v. 18 U.S.C. 286 (Conspiracy to Defraud the
More information2:11-cr MPM -DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:11-cr-20023-MPM -DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 E-FILED Wednesday, 06 April, 2011 01:55:50 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
More informationFILED JAN ~ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Case 1:14-cr-00001-SPW Document 1 Filed 01/16/14 Page 1 of 12 CARL E. ROSTAD Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office P.O. Box 3447 Great Falls, Montana 59403-3447 Direct Line: (406) 771-2001 Phone:
More informationCase 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cr-00136-PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GREGORY A. DERUE,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
Case 9:13-cr-00034-DWM Document 24 Filed 02/23/14 Page 1 of 6 TIMOTHY J. RACICOT Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney s Office P.O. Box 8329 Missoula, MT 59807 105 E. Pine, 2d Floor Missoula, MT 59802
More informationCase 2:17-cr GMS Document 3 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
'_Fll D Case :-cr-000-gms Document Filed 0// Page of Lru:cEIVED LODGED COPY 0 United States of America, vs. MAY 0 CLERK U S DIST'ritCT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA BY SEALED' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationDAVID B. CHALMERS, JR., : S1 05 Cr. 59 (DC) JOHN IRVING, LUDMIL DIONISSIEV, : BAYOIL (USA), INC., and BAYOIL SUPPLY & TRADING LIMITED, : COUNT ONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : - v. - : INDICTMENT DAVID B. CHALMERS, JR., : S1 05 Cr. 59 (DC) JOHN IRVING, LUDMIL
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WILLIAM JOSEPH BOYLE, Appellant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16-4339 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM JOSEPH BOYLE, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
More informationCase 1:17-cr ABJ Document 237 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 237 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 17-201-01 (ABJ) PAUL J. MANAFORT,
More information- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF
- 1-26 U.S.C. 7203 Sole Proprietorship or Partnership Employer's Quarterly Return Failure to File - Tabular Form Information Venue in District of Service Center 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. BARRY CROALL and RONALD FORD No. Violations: Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 666 and
More information9.37 ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT INCOME TAX (26 U.S.C. 7201)
9.37 ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT INCOME TAX (26 U.S.C. 7201) The defendant is charged in [Count of] the indictment with [specify charge] in violation of Section 7201 of Title 26 of the United States Code.
More informationCase 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 109-cr-00349-RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Holding a Criminal Term Grand Jury Sworn in on November 16, 2009 UNITED STATES OF
More informationDoes a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate Funds as Return of Capital?
Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law Faculty Publications 1-1-2008 Does a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate
More informationCase 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
;.I Case 3:13-cr-00332-KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PORTLAND DIVISION 0033~ Case No. 3:13-CR
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) Case No. 09- I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) aka Bill Washington ) and ) EMMA JEAN HOLMES, ) ) Defendants. )
More informationCase 2:12-cr AWA-DEM Document 8 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 28 FILED IN OPEN COURT
Case 2:12-cr-00064-AWA-DEM Document 8 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 28 FILED IN OPEN COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAY 1 4 2012 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cv-03680-VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, DICK
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. ) v. ) Violations: Title 18, United ) States Code, Sections 2, 666, STUART LEVINE, ) 1341, 1343,
More informationCase 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 7. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)
Case 5:18-cr-40053-DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket) Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-40053-01/02-DDC
More informationCase 2:13-cr LDD Document 24 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cr-00253-LDD Document 24 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DATE: 6-19-13 v. : CRIMINAL NO.: 13
More informationCase 1:16-cr RJA-MJR Document 24 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 10. v. 16-CR-72. Defendant. MOTION IN LIMINE OF THE UNITED STATES
Case 1:16-cr-00072-RJA-MJR Document 24 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 16-CR-72 IAN TARBELL, Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, VASCO DATA SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC., T. KENDALL
More informationCase 3:06-cr JWS-JDR Document 149 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 27
Case 3:06-cr-00070-JWS-JDR Document 149 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 27 NELSON P. COHEN UNITED STATES ATTORNEY KAREN L. LOEFFLER Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Plaintiff, (1}KALIN THANH DAO, (2)NGHIA TRONG DAO, and (3)THU NGUYET LE, Defendants. ) INDICTMENT ) (18 U.S.C. ) (18 U.S.C.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. 05 CR 691 ) v. ) Violations: Title 18, United ) States Code, Sections 666, ) 1341, 1343, 1346,
More informationUNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
24 RS UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 JOHN M. CRIM, Petitioner(s, v. Docket No. 1638-15 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
More informationCase 2:12-cr CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)
Case 2:12-cr-20041-CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. )
More informationCASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS
CASE NO. 05-11-01170-CR CASE NO. 05-11-01171-CR IN THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/09/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS ALFONSO
More information#"WrBr, :1'ly3':lT:i9iI1YI95.!. rmk:sss MAtsuMoTO, J. ---x. Derendan. tt;l&#iuti,u,u;:etljfr'i!t'j*, I F\A/ [/ I
Case 8:18-mj-01715-JSS Document 1 Filed 08/06/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 rmk:sss MAtsuMoTO, J. F#:2016R02185 :1'ly3':lT:i9iI1YI95.!. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES OF AMEzuCA I F\A/ [/ I ELY.,
More informationmuia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:15cw05146CA&JEM Document 1 fled 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on
More informationCase 1:17-cr NGG Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 80b-6, 80b-I4 and 80b-17;
Case 1:17-cr-00544-NGG Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 JMK:DCP/JPM/JPL F.#2012R01716 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X FilEB CLFRa - nu l- lft 20110^1-5?n \'
More informationCase 1:15-cr KAM Document 529 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 15202
Case 1:15-cr-00637-KAM Document 529 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 15202 BRAF"MAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 767 THIRD AVENUE, 26TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017 TELEPHONE: (212) 750-7800
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. 1:13CR TOTAL, S.A., Defendant. Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 371 (Conspiracy to Violate
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4490 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT FENN, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District
More informationCase 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.
Case 3:17-cv-00155-VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) MARK
More informationUNITED STATES NAVY MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
UNITED STATES NAVY MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS No. 201600417 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. JUSTIN C. SMITH Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant Appeal from the United States
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. Introduction
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD LEE DUTTON, SR., and VICKI R. DUTTON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Criminal Action No. 11-90-GMS
More informationCase 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:10-cr-00340-BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16 ----FILED ~vs x:. ~ HMGfPMC: USAO:2008R00558 ----LODGED ----.entered ---RECEIVED JUN 172010 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OLE ATSALTI
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2 JAMESY HAVENS 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C) DAVID FARNSWORTH 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(1)
More informationADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE Homework Exam Review WHITE COLLAR CRIME NAME: PERIOD: ROW:
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE Homework Exam Review WHITE COLLAR CRIME NAME: PERIOD: ROW: UNDERSTANDING WHITE COLLAR CRIME 1. White-collar crime is a broad category of nonviolent misconduct involving and fraud.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. Case No Honorable Patrick J. Duggan FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE,
Case 2:10-cv-11345-PJD-MJH Document 12 Filed 07/07/10 Page 1 of 7 ANTHONY O. WILSON, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Case No. 10-11345 Honorable
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2017 EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A Case 1:17-cr-00127-KMW Document 16 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ORIGINA x 1-1 -SIDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY
More informationFILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta
Case 1:15-cr-00338-MHC-CMS Document 1 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 17 FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. Criminal Indictment TONY HENDY TIRTAWTJAYA, ALIAKSEI, ALFREDO, TRUSHAR
More informationCASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR.
CASE NO. 05-11-01534-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 01/06/12 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR., Appellant
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-02064 Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) WESTPORT
More informationCase 1:05-cr RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 105-cr-00292-RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Holding a Criminal Term Grand Jury Sworn in on September 30, 2004 UNITED STATES OF
More informationCase 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA
Case 1:06-cr-00029 Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHERYL KYLES and DEREK HENRY Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:15-cr KAM Document 541 Filed 03/05/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: against - 15-cr-637(KAM)
Case 1:15-cr-00637-KAM Document 541 Filed 03/05/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 15872 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
More informationCase 1:08-cr Document 3 Filed 08/07/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cr-00246 Document 3 Filed 08/07/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CRIMINAL NO. Plaintiff, VIOLATION: 18 U.S.C. 371 and 15
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAWRENCE EUGENE SHAW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 13-50136 D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00862-JFW-1
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-cv-13616-AJT-MKM Doc # 280 Filed 03/01/16 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 10962 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pension
More informationCase 1:16-cr RJA-MJR Document 29 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:16-cr-00072-RJA-MJR Document 29 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16-CR-72-RJA-MJR -against- IAN TARBELL, Defendant.
More informationTonkon Torp LLP 888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1262 CITY OF PORTLAND, vs. Complainant, MOTION TO DISMISS OF PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, an Oregon corporation,
More informationCase 2:12-cr SD Document 1 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cr-00155-SD Document 1 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v. : DATE FILED: : VIOLATIONS:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 1:15-cr-10214-NMG Document 1 Filed 06/25/15 Page 1 of 1 AO 91 (Rev. 11/11 Criminal Complaint UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Massachusetts United States of America v. Daniel Fernandes
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLENA STARGELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-50392 D.C. No. 5:09-cr-00005-TJH-1 ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO) DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 18-CR-2058.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. TOM BRENNAN, Defendant. No. 18-CR-2058 INFORMATION Count 1 18 U.S.C.
More informationCase 4:15-cr Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/27/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:15-cr-00637 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/27/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. ALFONZO ELIEZER GRAVINA-MUNOZ CRIMINAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DEBBIE ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:15CV193 RWS CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, et al., Defendants, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before
More informationCase: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT
Case: 5:12-cv-00642-BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO : UNITED STATES SECURITIES : AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : CASE NO. Plaintiff,
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 1:10-cv-00115 Document 1 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : UNITED STATES SECURITIES : AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : CASE NO.
More informationUMDNJ Indictment http://www.justice.gov/usao/nj/press/files/pdffiles/indictmentbryantgallagher0329.pdf 2006R00424 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : Criminal
More informationCase 3:15-cr JO Document 17 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-00438-JO Document 17 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 12.. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 3:15-CR-00438-JO v. WINSTON SHROUT,
More informationCase 2:17-cr AWA-DEM Document 1 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA.
Case 2:17-cr-00094-AWA-DEM Document 1 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1 F!LL:D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division JUN 1 9 2017 CLERK, US DiyTRiCT COURT NORFOLK.
More informationCase 3:18-cr BTM Document 1 Filed 06/29/18 PageID.9 Page 1 of 11. saf/\laif;\ co CASE UNSEALED PER ORDER OF COURT
1 2 3 4 Case 3:18-cr-03072-BTM Document 1 Filed 0/2/18 PageID. Page 1 of 11 ~= 11 saf/\laif;\ co l i._!._ CASE UNSEALED PER ORDER OF COURT 18 JUN 2 PH ~: 2 8 ClERi. U.S ()lsirict COURT SOUTrt~i'N D!S TP:iCT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. ) v. ) Violations: Title 18, United States ) Code, Sections 666, 1343, and 1951 WILLIE B. COCHRAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.
FILED IN OPFM COURT ' % IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division.ALBaSbSFHSICQUHT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. l:10-cr- v. ANDREW B. SILVA,
More informationCase 2:15-cr MSD-LRL Document 2 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 22 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 2:15-cr-00021-MSD-LRL Document 2 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 22 PageID# 4 FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION MAR -2 2015 CLERK, US DISTRICT
More informationRECEIVED SEP Case 3:18-cr MAS Document 64 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 89 WILLAM T. WALSHJ.D STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, sitting at Newark, Millington, New Jersey. charges: attorney, who had a business office in Newark, New Jersey, and who
More informationCase 1:13-cr RWS-ECS Document 1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 1:13-cr-00048-RWS-ECS Document 1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 11 FILED IN OPEN COURT B_ u.s.d.c. Atlanta FEB 192013 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OR\G\Ni\L FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA James'
More informationCh. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS
Ch. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS 61 35.1 CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS Sec. 35.1. Tax examinations and assessments. 35.2. Interest, additions, penalties, crimes, and offenses. 35.3.
More informationCase 2:03-cr JCC Document 92 Filed 10/06/2003 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cr-000-JCC Document Filed /0/0 Page of Chief Judge John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) NO. CR0-0 Plaintiff, ) v. ) GOVERNMENT
More information