OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA COURT CLERK'S OFFICE CIMAREX ENERGY CO. ALL OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 14 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, CANADIAN COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
|
|
- Branden Burke
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FILE BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISS!N MAR APPLICANT: OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - CIMAREX ENERGY CO. OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA RELIEF SOUGHT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION POOLING ALL OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 14 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, CANADIAN COUNTY, OKLAHOMA CAUSE CD NO Report of the Administrative Law Judge EA Case Summary Newfield believes fair market value for this pooling is $1,300 and 1/8, $1,200 and 3/16, or $800 and 115. Mr. Sykora has not leased his interest and believes fair market value for his interest is $1,000 and 1/4. Although this matter has a contentious litigation history with much negotiation for lease acquisition, there is no leasing in the subject section or in the offsets for $1,000 and 1/4. Although Mr. Sykora may have been offered that, there are n& consummated arms-length transactions for that amount. The Newfield recommendations for fair market value are in line with the offsets and should be adopted as a recommendation. Recommendations Newfield requests this pooling and does not wish to offer a 1/4 royalty interest. The other terms are not disputed and appear fair and equitable, excepting bonus values. Mr. Sykora offers as evidence of increased lease values multi-section deals and offers to lease. Consummated leases, which cannot be explained away by common Commission reasoning, are reflected in the Newfield request. Consummated arms-length transactions are the gold standard and the Newfield pooling offer should be recommended. C. Hearing Date February 22, 2013
2 Page 2 of 6 D. Appearances John C. Moricoli, Jr., Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Applicant, Cimarex Energy Co.; Richard K. Books, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of James J. Sykora; Gregory L. Mahaffey, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Newfield; Richard Grimes, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Kirkpatrick. E. Exhibits One year transaction history as of January 12, 2013, for Section 14, Township 14 North, Range 7 West, Canadian County, Oklahoma. 2. An AFE from Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc. 3. Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc. 9 Spot Ownership map. 4. Completion Report of the Rock Island lh-14 well, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, form 1002a. F. Evidence Summary 1. Mr. Mahaffey presented an opening statement for Newfield. This Wildcat project had been completed in 2011 and was not pooled. Cimarex acquired a small interest and wanted well information. Newfield did not provide the requested information so Cimarex filed this pooling application. Newfield has since come to an agreement with Cimarex and Kirkpatrick, leaving James Sykora as the only protestant. This is a fair market value dispute. He said the Commission should consider present fair market value, not past fair market value, and the leases taken in anticipation of pooling should not be given consideration. He also noted this well would probably never pay out. Mr. Sykora agreed this was a fair market value dispute and he owns about 15 acres. Newfield had filed and dismissed a pooling and had paid $600 and 1/4 on June 8, He also cited a Timberwolf lease on August 17, 2011, that paid $1,000 and 1/4. 2. On November 7, 2011, Cimarex filed for pooling and this cause was ready for trial in January Mr. Sykora could not get information from Newfield so he filed a motion to produce cost and revenue information. This motion was recommended and Newfield appealed. The Commission ordered production, but no information was immediately provided. Finally, on October 4, 2012, the
3 Page 3 of 6 requested information was provided by Newfield. Mr. Sykora said they did request one continuance because his attorney, Mr. Richard Books, was sick. Newfield responded there was no requirement to pool interest and they had exchanged exhibits. Newfield was ready for trial on February 1, 2012, and had not provided well information because no timeframe was mentioned in the motion to produce. Newfield believed no one was rushing to trial, but they had circulated a pre-hearing conference agreement in December Mr. David Korell 3. Newfield presented their land witness, Mr. David Korell, and he said the well had been drilled and completed as shown on Exhibit 4 (form 1002a. They had tested the shallow zones on the way down to the Woodford. Cimarex had filed for pooling and they owned about 1%. Newfield owns about 93%, with Kirkpatrick and Sykora each owning about 14 acres. Well costs are in Exhibit 2 and come to $10,027, The highest and best leases presented by Newfield for fair market value were $1,300 and 1/8, $1,200 and 3/16, and $800 and 115. They did not wish to give 1/4 royalty interest. There was a single multi-section lease that paid $1,100 and 115. Kirkpatrick had given Cimarex a lease at $600 and 1/4, but this was after the pooling was filed. It was for less than an acre and most probably was a premium paid for well information. Timberwolf had also paid $1,000 and 1/4 for a lease, but this drilling project was well known at the time. After another well was drilled, values dropped after that well proved unsuccessful. Newfield requested 20 days to elect, 25 days to pay costs, 35 days to pay bonuses, and 180 days to drill. The same times for subsequent wells. 4. On cross-examination, he said the Cimarex interest is 1/4. He said the Peace family leased to Kirkpatrick for 1/4 interest, about 14 acres, and Kirkpatrick leased a portion of that to Cimarex. He believed Kirkpatrick acquired the leases for well information, but has not confirmed that with Kirkpatrick. He also believed the Timberwolf lease was taken because the well was drilling, but, again, he had not confirmed this belief. He opined the 1/4 royalty was too high, but the two 1/4 royalty leases were arms-length transactions, at least the Kirkpatrick lease. 5. On redirect, he noted that a 15-acre lease is a very small lease in relation to the 3,700 acres Newfield has leased in the area. Mr. Mike Hofstrom 6. Cimarex presented Mike Hofstrom as their land witness and he agreed with Mr. Korell's testimony regarding the Kirkpatrick lease. He said there was no objection to notice and they had good addresses for all respondents. Some of the respondents were dismissed from the amended application. He testified that from the end of 2011 through the date of this hearing, $600-1,000 and 1/4 royalty
4 Page 4 of 6 interest were fair market value. On Newfield cross-examination, he admitted Cimarex took a lease for well information. He also said Mr. Peace was a saavy royalty owner and he had probably shopped the lease for the best terms. He did not know much about Timberwoif or their leasing activity. Mr. Jamie Fitzpatrick 7. Mr. Sykora presented Jamie Fitzpatrick, a landman for Kirkpatrick, as witness and he said they had leased the Peace interest for more than fair market value because it was a business decision to pay more and it remained an arms-length transaction. 8. On cross-examination he said Mr. John Gelders had negotiated the lease. He knew the well was coming and had negotiated with Mr. Sykora. They bought the Peace interest because Mr. Peace did not wish to lease to Newfield. Kirkpatrick bought no other leases. Mr. James Svkora 9. Mr. James Sykora took the stand and testified he owned about 15 acres and was undecided about whether to participate. He usually did not participate and usually took the highest royalty interest. He has been in the oil and gas business for several years. He said he had an oil contract with Newfield for $1,000 and 1/4 in Section 14 and understood that an oral agreement was unenforceable. Newfield wanted to change to a multi-section lease and Mr. Sykora agreed. Newfield next changed the leasing deal and demanded that Mr. Peace's interest had to be included in the transaction. He requested $1,000 and 1/4 interest as fair market value, and noted the Corporation Commission had ordered well information provided in July That information was not provided by Newfield until the end of October Mr. Sykora noted he had received disparate costs from Newfield which, over a seven-month period at the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013, varied from a high of $12,600,000 to a low of $10,027,000, the lowest is reflected in Exhibit 2 and is the most recent cost estimate. 10. On cross-examination, Mr. Sykora admitted participating in only one $10 million or more expensive horizontal well. He admitted Newfield had sent him $1,000 and 1/4 interest lease deal, but the Newfield offer was contingent on a multisection lease, to include the Peace leases. Mr. Sykora could not put this deal together because Mr. Peace had already leased his interest to Kirkpatrick. He also wanted exact well costs. 1. Findings of Fact 1. In this Newfield pooling they are offering $1,300 and 1/8, $1,200 and 3/16, or $800 and 1/5. Mr. Sykora does not wish to lease his 15 acres for this amount, and believes his interest is valued at $1,000 and 1/4.
5 Page 5 of 6 2. There was a multi-section lease that paid $1,100 and 115. This was a single lease and was distinguished by the multi-section negotiation. 3. There was also a $600 and 1/4 lease paid after the pooling was filed. Again, this is a common Commission exception. 4. There was another lease by an entity called Timberwolf, and this lease for $1,000 and 1/4. At the time of this lease the project was well-known. 5. Newfield had offered Mr. Sykora a 1/4 lease, but that transaction was never consummated and was merely an oral understanding. 6. Notice of this proceeding is governed by OAC 165:5-7-9(a. 7. Proper notice of this proceeding was given pursuant to law and rules of the Commission. 2. Conclusions of Law The gold standard for establishing bonuses is an arms-length consummated lease in the same section as the requested pooling. In this, Newfield is offering fair market value as $1,300 and 1/8, $1,200 and 1/16, or $800 and 1/5. There are no other disputed matters in this pooling. It is strictly a bonus and royalty interest dispute. 2. Mr. Sykora, requesting $1,000 and 1/4, cites area leasing that precedes the drilling of a well that may not pay out. He also cites leases that were clearly taken to obtain well information. Very small interest with over-market-value bonuses. 3. Purchasing a lease because one desires well information or purchasing a lease because it is a multi-section deal do not establish fair market value. A multisection deal allows the recipient of the lease to negotiate better terms, since it is more than one section. 4. In this matter it is not disputed that Newfield took months to provide information which was ordered by the Commission, nor is it disputed that the AFE changed several times with a difference of about $2.5 million. These actions are not the issue before the Commission and need not be further addressed. 5. Newfield is offering lease values that are reflected by consummated arms-length transactions in the section and offsets, and these are sufficient evidence to support the lease values. The Newfield pooling should be recommended.
6 Page 6 of 6 Respectfully submitted this 25th day of March PEP:js PAUL PORTER Administrative Law Judge Cc: John C. Moricoli, Jr. Richard K. Books Gregory L. Mahaffey Richard Grimes Michael Decker, Director of OAP Oil Law Records Commission Files
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA AND PRODUCTION, L.L.0 ) POOLING. Report of the Administrative Law Judge
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA F I L Ev 0 APPLICANT: SANDRIDGE EXPLORATION ) JAN 2 6 2015 RELIEF SOUGHT: AND PRODUCTION, L.L.0 ) POOLING Cf)UR r CLERK'S *f ION 9MM U UI(1.AHQM&
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA BAYS EXPLORATION, INC.
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: BAYS EXPLORATION, INC. RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SE/4 SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST, MCCLAIN COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE CD NO.
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE CD NO. 201503363 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 14 NORTH,
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA HORIZONTAL WELL) REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA 7 APPLICANT: RELIEF SOUGHT: NEWFIELD EXPLORATION MID- CONTINENT INC. POOLING (PART OF A MULTIUNIT HORIZONTAL WELL) CAUSE CD NO. 201 503677-T LEGAL
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSIO OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA F CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. POOLING REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
APPLICANT: BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSIO OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA F CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. 1 L E SO 172012 COURT CLERK'S OFFICE. OKC CORPORATION COMMI5N OF OKLAHOMA RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JTJDGORPORJ\TtON COMMISSION
1 BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: CITIZEN ENERGY II, LLC ) RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING ) CAUSE CD NO. 201506281T LEGAL SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP DESCRIPTION 9 NORTH, RANGE 5
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. REPORT OF THE OIL AND GAS APPELLATE REFEREE
APPLICANT: BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. I I E FEB 112014 4 'U '.M file - 0KG 44 1.kA' ION OQMMIION 4' OKLAHOMA RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING
More informationCOMP BEFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA RESOURCES, INC REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
FILE MAR 30 2012 COURT CLL,KS OFFICE - OKC COMP BEFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA )RATION CowssioN APPLICANT: CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION FEB OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE CD NO
APPLICANT: FED BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION FEB 262014 OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION FULCRUM EXPLORATION, L.L.C. OF OKLAHOMA RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE
More informationJAN Q COURT CLERK'S OFFICE-OKC CORPORATION COMMISSIO N
l.). BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM A APPLICANT : RELIEF SOUGHT : LEGAL DESCRIPTION : APPLICANT : RANKEN ENERGY CORPORATION SPACING W/2 SW/4 OF SECTION 11 & E/2 SE/4 OF SECTION
More informationSP t2 12oO faah$ffi,4
ILE D SP t2 12oO faah$ffi,4 BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF 2 2013 APPLICANT: RELIEF SOUGHT: EQUAL ENERGY US INC POOLING - DEER VALLEY #1-31H LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 14
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATEMENT OF THE CASE
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA V A IS APPLICANT: NEWFIELD EXPLORATION MID-CONTINENT INC. RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING (PART OF A MULTI-UNIT HORIZONTAL WELL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CIMAREX ENERGY CO. REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
APPLICANT : RELIEF REQUESTED : BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CIMAREX ENERGY CO. POOLING LEGAI, DESCRIPTION : SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 9 WEST, CANADIAN COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
More informationTRIAD ENERGY, INC. REPORT OF THE OIL AND GAS APPELLATE REFEREE
APPLICANT: ILE FD BEFORE THE Co1oltTIoN COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA SEP. 032013 TRIAD ENERGY, INC. %,L'4 10*, jr ICE OKC tii4ya T ION COMMISSION OKLAHOMA RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE CD NO. 201200215
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. CHANGE OF OPERATOR AMERICAN ENERGY - WOODFORD, LLC
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA FILE SEP 252015 APPLICANT: RELIEF SOUGHT: DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. CHANGE OF OPERATOR COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION
More informationSECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST, BLAINE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA FINDINGS
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: RELIEF SOUGHT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. POOLING SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST, BLAINE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) DRILLING AND SPACING UNITS)
C, APPLICANT: RELIEF SOUGHT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA BLUE QUAIL, LTD AND JACKSON ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC DRILLING AND SPACING UNITS SOUTHEAST
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA INTERIM ORDER
r a BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT : ST. MARY LAND & EXPLORATION COMPAN Y RELIEF SOUGHT : LOCATION EXCEPTION ) ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION : THE E/2 OF SECTION 17, ) TOWNSHIP
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION CO NEWFIELD EXPLORATION MID-CONTINENT INC. POOLING (PART OF A MULTIUNIT HORIZONTAL WELL)
BEFORE THE CORPORATION CO OF THE STATE OF OlaJuioMA ION APPLICANT: NEWFIELD EXPLORATION MID-CONTINENT INC. RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING (PART OF A MULTIUNIT HORIZONTAL WELL) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION ) RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING ) ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION The W½ of Section 7 and The W 1J4 of Section 18, Township
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, L.L.C. CAUSE CD No
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, L.L.C. REQUESTED: POOLING (PART OF A MULTIUNIT) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 18
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: LE NORMAN OPERATING LLC AND ) TEMPLAR ENERGY LLC ) ) RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING ) CAUSE CD NO. ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 14, ) 201808673
More information1eQi 2 ILE BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION REPORT OF THE OIL AND GAS APPELLATE REFEREE
1eQi 2 ILE APPLICANT: BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION FOCT 112013 OF THE STATE OF Oiu.AIIO1vIA COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION OF OKLAHOMA CO., LP RELIEF SOUGHT:
More informationMARATHON OIL COMPANY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: MARATHON OIL COMPANY RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING ) CAUSE CD NO. 201703778 ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A L L O F S E C T I O N 34, ) TOWNSHIP 17
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANTS: RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C. LEGAL SECTION 5 DESCRIPTION: TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH
More informationTERRITORY RESOURCES, LLC TERRITORY RESOURCES, LLC RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE CD NO T REPORT OF THE OIL AND GAS APPELLATE REFEREE
ILE APPLICANT: BEFORE THE CORPORATION CoMMIssIoN I JUN 14 2012 OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA COURT CLERKS OFFICE- OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA TERRITORY RESOURCES, LLC RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jun 30 2016 11:18:49 2015-CA-01772 Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BROOKS V. MONAGHAN VERSUS ROBERT AUTRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-01772 APPELLEE APPEAL
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition of the Venango County : Tax Claim Bureau for Judicial : Sale of Lands Free and Clear : of all Taxes and Municipal Claims, : Mortgages, Liens, Charges
More informationBEFORE THE Com'oiTIoN COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.
(5 APPLICANT: RELIEF SOUGHT: BEFORE THE Com'oiTIoN COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C. POOLING F ILED MAY 0 9 2011 COURT CLERK'S OFFICE - OKC
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS
CLAIMS AGAINST INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker,
More informationDAILY & WOODS A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JERRY L. CANFIELD, P.A. THOMAS A. DAILY, P.A. WYMAN R. WADE, JR., P.A. DOUGLAS M. CARSON, P.A. ROBERT R. BRIGGS, P.A. * C. MICHAEL DAILY, P.A. COBY W. LOGAN L. MATTHEW DAVIS, P.A. COLBY T. ROE * Fayetteville
More informationfile:///i /...20Received/2011/October/Objection%20to%20Integration%20-Sec.%2011%20T4N-R32W%20Sebastian%20County%20AR.htm[10/20/2011 2:40:48 PM]
From: Elaine [ebrewster1@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 8:21 AM To: alan.york@aogc.state.ar.us Cc: 'Bobby Moffett' Subject: Objection to Integration -Sec. 11, T4N-R32W, Sebastian County,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA BEST DAY CHARTERS, INC., vs. Petitioner, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DOR 05-15-FOF CASE NO. 05-1752 (DOAH) Respondent. FINAL ORDER This cause
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ORDER OF THE COMMISSION. Findings and Order
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: SANDRIDGE EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, LLC RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING ) ) ) ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Fractional Section 13, Township 29 North,
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: RELIEF GRANTED: POOLING ) ) CAUSE CD NO. ) 201106641-T LAND COVERED: SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST, GARFIELD COUNTY, OKLAHOMA ) ORDER
More informationDRILLING AND SPACING UNITS REPORT OF THE OIL AND GAS APPELLATE REFEREE
An V 914\1 c. BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OluAnoiviA APPLICANT: JOHN C. AND SUSAN L. MITCHELL AND STEVEN V. AND CONNIE R. REDGATE I L E OCT 11 2012 CC' IRT CLERK'S OFFICE - 0KG `0P0RATI0N
More informationFILED BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: CRUDE WELL EXPLORATION, LLC RELIEF
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: CRUDE WELL EXPLORATION, LLC ) If RELIEF REQUESTED: AMEND, MODIFY, CLARIFY, INTERPRET TERMS, PROVISIONS, COSTS AND EXPENSES FOR PLAN
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM A ORDER DENYING APPLICATIO N
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM A APPLICANT : RELIEF SOUGHT : EXCEPTION TO RULE N0.165:10-1-2 1 LAND COVERED: SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 24 WEST, HARPER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ROBYN STRICKLAND, DIRECTOR PETROLEUM STORAGE TANK DIVISION, OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: ROBYN STRICKLAND, DIRECTOR PETROLEUM STORAGE TANK DIVISION, OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION RESPONDENT: INTERNATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE dba IBC BANK,
More informationWASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee, MAHAFFEY, Appellant. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44, 2003-Ohio-4422.
[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44, 2003-Ohio-4422.] WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee, v. MAHAFFEY, Appellant. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44,
More informationRichards, Michael v. A-1 Expert Tree Service
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 3-6-2017 Richards, Michael
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. EAGLE AIRCRAFT CORP. and CENTURION AVIATION COMPANY Petitioners, Case No DOR No.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE EAGLE AIRCRAFT CORP. and CENTURION AVIATION COMPANY Petitioners, Case No. 97-2905 vs. DOR No. 98-15-FOF DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Respondent. FINAL ORDER This cause came
More informationJudgment Rendered October
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 0450 IN THE MATIER OF THE MASHBURN MARITAL TRUSTS CONSOLIDATED WITH NUMBER 2008 CA 0451 IN THE MATTER OF THE
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) J. P. Donovan Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-2747 )
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) J. P. Donovan Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 55335 ) Under Contract No. N62467-02-C-2747 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Edward J. Kinberg, Esq.
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CURT BEAN TRANSPORT COMPANY
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F500351 DAVID CHILDRESS CURT BEAN TRANSPORT COMPANY CLAIMANT RESPONDENT COMPENSATION MANAGERS, INC. NO. 1 RESPONDENT INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA
More informationFORCE POOLING ORDER OF THE COMMISSION FINDINGS
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: HUSKY VENTURES, INC. RELIEF SOUGHT: FORCE POOLING CAUSE CD NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 8 WEST, KINGFISHER
More informationMichael E. McElroy - Attorney Kevin E. Smith - Consultant " " Steve Hillhouse - Vice President " " PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY
******************************************** * KEY ISSUES: Waste * * Standing to Protest * * Length of Fracture Zones * * * * FINAL ORDER: DENIED * ******************************************** RULE 37
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable
FOURTH DIVISION April 30, 2009 No. 1-08-1445 In re THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND Ex Officio COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS, FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE AGAINST REAL ESTATE RETURNED
More informationCircuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017
Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-02-000895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1100 September Term, 2017 ALLAN M. PICKETT, et al. v. FREDERICK CITY MARYLAND, et
More informationDECISION I. INTRODUCTION
HEARING OFFICER, CAREER SERVICE BOARD CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO Appeal No. 60-04 DECISION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF: VINCENT MACIEYOVSKI, Appellant, vs. Department of Safety, Denver Sheriff's
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM A
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM A /10 APPLICANT: BURAY, LLC ) CAUSE CD NO. ) RELIEF SOUGHT : POOLING ) 200900296 ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 13, T3N, ) ORDER NO. R22E, LEFLORE
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F DENNIS G. DAVIS, EMPLOYEE
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F213363 DENNIS G. DAVIS, EMPLOYEE J & J DRIVE-AWAY, EMPLOYER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT NO. 1
More information* * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND LHR, INC. * Appellant * v. * Case No. lo-c-1o-000662 ROBERT A YREE * Appellee * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Return and Report of an : Upset Tax Sale held by the : Cumberland County Tax Claim : Bureau on September 20, 2007 : No. 1829 C.D. 2008 : Re: Property of
More informationCase 2:05-cv SRD-JCW Document Filed 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 18958 Filed 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CIVIL ACTION CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION No. 05-4182
More informationCase 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204
Case 3:09-cv-01736-N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S OF LONDON
More informationI f BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA GLACIER PETROLEUM COMPANY, OKLA, INC. POOLIN G
4 w I f BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT : RELIEF SOUGHT : GLACIER PETROLEUM COMPANY, OKLA, INC. POOLIN G ) ) ) ) CAUSE CD NO. ) 200806841 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : W/2 SE/4
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, L.L.C. CAUSE CD No
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, L.L.C. REQUESTED: POOLING (PART OF A MULTIUNIT) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 18
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSIO~a~ ~A co,y,yss~okc OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA yomq N
., -., Sf F 2 4 2010 CRPpC~ERk I S pf BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSIO~a~ ~A co,y,yss~okc OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA yomq N APPLICANT : PETROQUEST ENERGY, L.L.C RELIEF SOUGHT: POOLING CAUSE CD NO. 201000906-
More informationCASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS
CASE NO. 05-11-01170-CR CASE NO. 05-11-01171-CR IN THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/09/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS ALFONSO
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000 SHANTA FONTON MCKAY V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 97-B-786
More informationThe LACERA Disability Litigation Office is sending you this information because:
2 The LACERA Disability Litigation Office is sending you this information because: The Board of Retirement denied your application for disability retirement You appealed the denial An attorney does not
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: January 7, 2005; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2003-CA-000032-MR IDELLA WARREN APPELLANT APPEAL FROM BELL CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JAMES L. BOWLING,
More informationChapter 3 Preparing the Record
Chapter 3 Preparing the Record After filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant next needs to specify what items are to be in the record (the official account of what went on at the hearing or the trial
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC., Appellant, v. BACJET, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, BERNARD A. CARBALLO, CARBALLO VENTURES,
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION ANSWER
BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION In the Matter of: JUSTIN JOSEPH TEDROWE, Attorney-Respondent, Comm. No. 2014PR00091 No. 2804905. ANSWER COUNT
More informationRAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS GAS SERVICES DIVISION ) ) ) )
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS GAS SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF INTENT OF WEST TEXAS GAS, INC. TO INCREASE GAS DISTRIBUTION RATES IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF TEXAS GUD NO. STATEMENT OF INTENT OF WEST
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION
Serfass et al v. The CIT Group Consumer Finance Inc Doc. 61 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION James Serfass and Joan Serfass, ) ) Civil Action
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE TREASURER, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED November 18, 2010 v No. 294142 Muskegon Circuit Court HOMER LEE JOHNSON, LC No. 09-046457-CZ and Defendant/Counter-Defendant-
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 57D Article 6 1
Article 6. Dissolution. 57D-6-01. Dissolution. An LLC is dissolved upon the occurrence of any of the following: (1) An event causing the LLC to dissolve under the operating agreement. (2) If the LLC never
More informationSEPTEMBER 21, 2016 KERRY WEST NO CA-0148 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
KERRY WEST VERSUS SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD NO. 2016-CA-0148 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ORLEANS NO. 8287 JAMES F. MCKAY III CHIEF JUDGE (Court
More informationmg Doc 7335 Filed 08/01/14 Entered 08/01/14 10:42:15 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 LEWIS LAW PLLC Local Counsel to Maurice Sharpe 120 Bloomingdale Road, Suite 100 White Plains, NY 10605 (914) 761-8400 klewis@lewispllc.com Kenneth M. Lewis DAVID J. WINTERON & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
More informationLICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO
LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO Westside Discount, Inc. ) Aladdin Shaban, President ) Applicant (Packaged Goods) ) For the premises located at ) Case No. 11 LA 28 3821-23 West Roosevelt Road
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 30, 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 30, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. RALPH LEPORE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 9392 O. Duane
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE. Martin L. Ehlen, Chicago, Illinois, for the appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE BERNADINE DAVIS, Appellant, DOCKET NUMBER CH-0752-04-0624-I-1 v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Agency. DATE: September 29, 2004 Martin
More informationANTHONY J. RUSSO NO CA-0952 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
ANTHONY J. RUSSO VERSUS LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2014-CA-0952 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Jonathan Grossman 154452 Staff Attorney Sixth District Appellate Program 100 N. Winchester Blvd., Suite 310 Santa Clara, CA 95050 (408) 241-6171 Attorney for Reginald Dewayne Ferguson IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED BRIAN FOGARTY and CHRISTINE FOGARTY, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
More informationTAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET
TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT REQUIREMENTS THAT NEED TO BE MET BEFORE A TAX OBJECTION CAN BE FILED. 1. If a person desires to file a he/she shall pay all of the taxes due within
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO ST. ELIZABETH HOME SOCIETY (HAMILTON, ONTARIO) - and -
Court of Appeal File No. Ontario Superior Court File No. 339/96 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN: COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO ST. ELIZABETH HOME SOCIETY (HAMILTON, ONTARIO) - and - Plaintiff (Respondent) THE CORPORATION
More informationREPORT OF THE COMMISSION
,, 3, r3 0 0 0 7 69 I O O a BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM A APPLICANT : EXXON COMPANY, U. S.A., A D ivision, of Exxon Corporation IN THE M ATTER OF : Pooling the interests of
More information680 REALTY PARTNERS AND CRC REALTY CAPITAL CORP. - DECISION - 04/26/96
680 REALTY PARTNERS AND CRC REALTY CAPITAL CORP. - DECISION - 04/26/96 In the Matter of 680 REALTY PARTNERS AND CRC REALTY CAPITAL CORP. TAT (E) 93-256 (UB) - DECISION TAT (E) 95-33 (UB) NEW YORK CITY
More informationKAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW
KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILLIAM CORNELL ARCHBOLD, JR* JOSEPH PATRICK O'BRIEN** JOHN YANOSHAK CHRISTOPHER H. PEIFER*** OF COUNSEL FRED KREPPEL GLEN MADERE EDWARD KASSAB 1927-2010 *ALSO MEMBER
More informationBEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: LORI WROTENBERY, DIRECTOR OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION DIVISION OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION RESPONDENT(S): SUPERIOR OIL AND GAS CO.
More informationUNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Before TOZZI, CELTNIEKS, and BURTON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Major DAVID L. JERKINS United States Army, Appellant ARMY 20140071
More informationCOUNSEL JUDGES. Federici, J., wrote the opinion. WE CONCUR: WILLIAM RIORDAN Justice, HARRY E. STOWERS, JR., Justice AUTHOR: FEDERICI OPINION
VIKING PETRO., INC. V. OIL CONSERVATION COMM'N, 1983-NMSC-091, 100 N.M. 451, 672 P.2d 280 (S. Ct. 1983) VIKING PETROLEUM, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, vs. OIL CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW
More informationORDER ON RATE FILING. On August 28, 2017, the NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION
FILED OCT 31 2017 OFFICE OF OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULAT ION INSURANCE R U ION D A V I D A L T M A I E R COMMIsS]oN[iR Revised Workers' Compensation Rates and Rating Values as Filed by the NATIONAL COUNCIL
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CCC CONSTRUCTION NO. 1 RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F910339 BOB DAVIS CLAIMANT CCC CONSTRUCTION NO. 1 RESPONDENT BITUMINOUS CASUALTY, NO. 1 RESPONDENT INSURANCE CARRIER CITY OF MENA NO. 2 RESPONDENT
More informationCotton, Alan v. HUMACare, Inc.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 3-24-2016 Cotton, Alan v.
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF ACCT. NO.: GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ASSESSMENT DOCKET NO.: 17-180 $ 1 RAY HOWARD,
More informationSENATE FLOOR VERSION February 12, 2018 AS AMENDED
SENATE BILL NO. 01 SENATE FLOOR VERSION February, AS AMENDED By: Sparks [ insurance - Insurance Business Transfer Act - purpose - defining terms - jurisdiction - court actions - rules and procedures -
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jeffrey Kovach, Winona Kovach and : Debra Doriguzzi, : : Appellants : : v. : No. 1303 C.D. 2012 : Tri County Joint Municipal Authority : Submitted: April 16, 2013
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF (ACCT. NO.: ) GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ASSESSMENT LETTER ID: DOCKET NO.: 18-024
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014 ROBERTO SOLANO and MARLENE SOLANO, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D12-1198 [May 14,
More informationOntario Superior Court of Justice. Small Claims Court Goderich, Ontario. - and - Bill Steenstra
Court File No. 231/08 Ontario Superior Court of Justice Small Claims Court Goderich, Ontario Between: Hydro One Networks Inc. - and - Bill Steenstra Heard: April 21, June 4 and August 30, 2010 Judgment:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA
Citation: R. v. Moman (R.), 2011 MBCA 34 Date: 20110413 Docket: AR 10-30-07421 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) C. J. Mainella and ) O. A. Siddiqui (Respondent) Applicant
More information[Cite as Cugini & Capoccia Builders v. Ciminello's, Inc., 2003-Ohio-2059.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Cugini & Capoccia Builders v. Ciminello's, Inc., 2003-Ohio-2059.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Cugini and Capoccia Builders, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 02AP-1020
More informationNo. 45,945-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered January 26, 2011. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 45,945-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * CITIBANK
More informationRESPONDENT: MARCHI C. McCARTNEY, DIRECTOR, ) TRANSPORTATION DIVISION ) OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION ) CAUSE NO. TD
F ILE APR 24 2012 BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: TERRY BOMHAK COURT CLERKS OFFICE - OKC CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA RESPONDENT: MARCHI C. McCARTNEY, DIRECTOR, ) TRANSPORTATION
More informationSIGNIFICANT CASES IN OIL AND GAS LAW
SIGNIFICANT CASES IN OIL AND GAS LAW Oil and Gas Report 20 by STRUDWICK MARVIN ROGERS Counsel, Alabama Oil and Gas Board Assistant Attorney General With contributions by Members of the Council of State
More information