IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
|
|
- Bruce Martin
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 E-Copy Received Jan 21, :32 PM IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA LAVORIS JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Case No. 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL LAURA FISHER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Florida Bar No Office of the Attorney General 1515 N. Flagler Drive, Ste. 900 West Palm Beach, FL Primary (561) (561) COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CITATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE# ii iii-iv PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 4 ARGUMENT ISSUE I: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR IN DENYING APPELLANT S REQUEST FOR AN INDEPENDENT ACT INSTRUCTION 4 ISSUE II: THE TRIAL COURT DID ERR IN DENYING MOTINO FOR JUDGMENT OF AQUITTAL AS THE STATE PRESENTED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT APPELLANT COMMITTED ATTEMPTED ROBBERY 8 ISSUE III: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR IN GRANTING JURORS REQUEST TO REVIEW VIDEOS WITHOUT CONSULTING JOHNSON 12 ISSUE IV: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR IN DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF AQUITTAL ON SECOND DEGREE MURDER AS TEHRE WAS EVIDENCE OF DEPRAVED MIND. 14 CONCLUSION 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 18 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 18 ii
3 Cases TABLE OF CITATIONS Page Archer v. State, 613 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1993)... 5 Bradley v. State, 33 So. 3d 664 (Fla. 2010)... 5 Brinson v. State, 18 So. 3d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009) Bryant v. State, 412 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 1982)... 5 Charles v. State, 945 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)... 6 Hodge v. State, 970 So. 2d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008) Johnston v. State, 863 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2003)... 9,14 Lewis v. State, 22 So. 3d 753 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)... 4 Lovette v. State, 636 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. 1994)... 6 McBride v. State, 7 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009) McConnell v. Union Carbide Corp., 937 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006) McGee v. State, 792 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001) Michelson v. State, 805 So. 2d 983 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001) Mills v. State, 620 So. 2d 1006 (F la. 1993) iii
4 Perriman v. State, 731 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 1999)... 4 Ray v. State, 755 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2000)... 6 Santiago v. State, 874 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004) State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986) Stephens v. State, 787 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2001)... 4, 14 Terry v. State, 668 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 1996) Thomas v. State, 531 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1988) Wagner v. State, 921 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006) Florida Statutes (2013) (1) (2013) (2013)... 9 iv
5 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This brief will refer to Appellant as such, Defendant, or by proper name, e.g., "Johnson Appellee, the State of Florida, was the prosecution below; the brief will refer to Appellee as such, the prosecution, or the State. Reference to the record on appeal will be by the symbol R; reference to the transcripts will be by the symbol T; reference to any supplemental record or transcripts will be by the symbols SR or ST; and reference to Appellant s brief will be by the symbol IB; all followed by the appropriate volume and page numbers. For example page one of volume two of a third supplemental record would appear as (R. V_ T._ ). STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS Appellee accepts Appellant s statements of the case and facts, in so far as they are directly supported by appropriate citations to the record, are not argumentative, are relevant to the issues at bar and subject to the additions and clarifications contained below and in the argument section of this answer brief. Appellant s videotaped statement to police was published to the jury. (Vol. 6 T ). Appellant s lifelong friend, Brian Rucker, drove Appellant and Sanchez to the location. (Vol. 6 T. 522). He covered his head and followed Sanchez into the store. (Vol. 6. T ). When the interviewing detective
6 asked Appellant why he would get involved, when he knew what was going to happen, Appellant did not deny his involvement, but answered, it was a stupid thing to do. (V. 6 T Appellant denied knowing Sanchez had a gun, but admitted that he saw Sanchez pull the gun on a customer, force him on the ground and take items from his pockets. (V , 530-1,5). He stood near the customer and touched the items taken from his pockets when Sanchez took his gun off the customer and went to the back of the store. Id. After hearing gun shots, he followed Sanchez as he ran from the back of the store. Id. He and Sanchez saw Rucker s car, got in and fled. (V. 6 T. 524). Amis El Manlouk testified that he was in his car waiting for another store to open when he saw two men walk toward Amigo s, masking themselves. (Vol. 6 T. 460). The first man was carrying a silver revolver. Id. The men were a foot away from each other as they entered the store. Id. Less than 20 seconds later, both men ran out of the store. Id. Miguel Quiroz testified he was shopping at Amigos when a man put a gun to his head and demanded money. (V. 5 T ). He was forced to the ground and $600 American Dollars were taken from his wallet, but his Mexican money was not taken. Id. Mohammad Alam, the owner Amigo s convenience store, testified that his store has four visible surveillance cameras and that Appellant had been a regular customer. (V. 6 T ). 2
7 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ISSUE I: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING APPELLANT S REQUEST FOR THE INDEPENDENT ACT INSTRUCTION. THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE PROVING APPELLANT PARTICIPATED IN THE ATTEMPTED ROBBERY AND THAT THE SHOOTING OF THE STORE CLERK WAS A REASONABLY FORESEEABLE CONSEQUENCE. ISSUE II: THE TRIAL COURT DID ERR IN DENYING APPELLANT S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF AQUITTAL. THE STATE PRESENTED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT APPELLANT COMMITTED ATTEMPTED ROBBERY WITH CO-DEFENDANT SANCHEZ. ISSUE III: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR IN GRANTING JURY S REQUEST TO REVIEW SURVEILLANCE VIDEOTAPES AND THE VIDEPTAPE OF APPELLANT S STATEMENT TO POLICE. APPELLANT WAS ADVISED OF THE REQUEST AND GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT BEFORE THE JURY WAS BROUGHT BACK TO THE COURT ROOM TO REVIEW THE VIDEOTAPES. ISSUE IV: APPELLANT FAILED TO PRESERVE THIS CLAIM FOR APPELLATE REVIEW. ON THE MERITS, THE STATE PRESENTED SUBSTANTIAL COMPETENT EVIDENCE SUPPORTING APPELLANTS CONVICTION FOR 2 ND DEGREE FELONY MURDER. 3
8 ARGUMENT ISSUE I: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING APPELLANT S REQUEST FOR THE INDEPENDENT ACT INSTRUCTION. THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE PROVING APPELLANT PARTICIPATED IN THE ATTEMPTED ROBBERY AND THAT THE SHOOTING OF THE STORE CLERK WAS A REASONABLY FORESEEABLE CONSEQUENCE. Standard of Review Appellant courts afford trial courts broad discretion in formulating appropriate jury instructions and will only reverse when the error results in a miscarriage of justice or was likely to confuse or mislead the jury. Lewis v. State, 22 So. 3d 753, 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009). The Florida Supreme Court explained: The Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases were designed to eliminate or minimize juror confusion concerning the applicable law in criminal cases. The instructions were researched and formulated by a committee of experts and then reviewed by this Court in an effort to eliminate imprecision. The charges were designed above all to be accurate and clear and thus to withstand appellate scrutiny. Perriman v. State, 731 So. 2d 1243, 1246 (Fla. 1999). The failure to give special jury instructions does not constitute error where the instructions given adequately address the applicable legal standards. Stephens v. State, 787 So. 2d 747, 755 (Fla. 2001). Thus, [a defendant] has the burden of demonstrating that the trial court abused its discretion in giving standard instructions. Id. at To meet that 4
9 burden, a defendant must show, (1) the requested instruction accurately states the law applicable to the facts of the case; (2) the testimony and other evidence presented support the giving of the instruction; and (3) the instruction was necessary to resolve the issues in the case properly. McConnell v. Union Carbide Corp., 937 So. 2d 148, 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006) (citations omitted). Argument The independent act doctrine only arises when one co-felon, who previously participated in a common plan, does not participate in acts committed by his co-felon, which fall outside of, and are foreign to, the common design of the original collaboration, and it does not apply when death is a foreseeable result of the plan. Bradley v. State, 33 So. 3d 664, 675 (Fla. 2010). See, Archer v. State, 613 So. 2d 446, 448 (Fla. 1993)(holding that the independent act theory is inappropriate when the defendant created the situation and the victim's death was a natural and foreseeable result of forces which the defendant set in motion). The felony murder rule and the law of principles [sic] combine to make a felon liable for the acts of his co-felons. Bryant v. State, 412 So.2d 347, 350 (Fla.1982) For a defendant to be criminally liable for the acts of his co-felons as a consequence of the felony murder rule and the law of principals, 5
10 it is necessary that the lethal act... be in furtherance or prosecution of the common design or unlawful act the parties set out to accomplish ; there must be some causal connection between the homicide and the felony. Bryant, 412 So. 2d at 350. The lethal act will be in furtherance of or causally connected to the original scheme where it assists in escape or the avoidance of immediate detection. See Lovette v. State, 636 So. 2d 1304, 1307 (Fla. 1994) When defendant was a willing participant in the underlying felony and the murder resulted from forces which they set in motion. Charles v. State, 945 So. 2d 579, 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006) citing to Ray v. State, 755 So. 2d 604, 609 (Fla. 2000). Appellant s videotaped statement to police was published to the jury. (Vol. 6 T ). Appellant s lifelong friend, Brian Rucker, drove Appellant and Sanchez to the location. (Vol. 6 T. 522). He covered his head and followed Sanchez into the store. (Vol. 6. T ). When the interviewing detective asked Appellant why he would get involved, when he knew what was going to happen, Appellant did not deny his involvement, but answered, it was a stupid thing to do. (V. 6 T Appellant denied knowing Sanchez had a gun, but admitted that he saw Sanchez pull the gun on a customer, force him on the ground and take items from his pockets. (V , 530-1,5). He stood near the customer and touched the items taken from his 6
11 pockets when Sanchez took his gun off the customer and went to the back of the store. Id. After hearing gun shots, he followed Sanchez as he ran from the back of the store. Id. He and Sanchez saw Rucker s car, got in and fled. (V. 6 T. 524). Amis El Manlouk testified that he was in his car waiting for another store to open when he saw two men walk toward Amigo s, masking themselves. (Vol. 6 T. 460). The first man was carrying a silver revolver. Id. The men were a foot away from each other as they entered the store. Id. Less than 20 seconds later, both men ran out of the store. Id. Miguel Quiroz testified he was shopping at Amigos when a man put a gun to his head and demanded money. (V. 5 T ). He was forced to the ground and $600 American Dollars were taken from his wallet, but his Mexican money was not taken. Id. Mohammad Alam, the owner Amigo s convenience store, testified that his store has four visible surveillance cameras and that Appellant had been a regular customer. (V. 6 T ). Appellant cites to Charles v. State, 945 So. 2d 579, 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006), wherein this Court held that the trial court should have given the jury the independent act instruction. Charles testified that there was never any plan to rob the victim and that he only agreed to participate in an aggravated assault. Id. Conversely, the trial court in this case, refused the instruction, finding Appellant did participate 7
12 in the attempted robbery and that the shooting of the law clerk was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the crime. (V. 7. T ). As outlined above, the evidence adduced at trial supports this decision. This case is also entirely distinguishable from McGee v. State, 792 So. 2d 624, 627 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2001), where the evidence presented at trial established that McGee remained in the car during co-defendant s entire confrontation with the victim. Conversely, the evidence adduced at trial established Appellant aided and abetted Sanchez in the attempted robbery of the Amigo convenience store. Harmless Error Should this Court find that the judge should have instructed the jury as requested by the defense, the state argues it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, as the instructions as whole were adequate. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). 8
13 ISSUE II: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR WHEN IT DENIED APPELLANT S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL. THE STATE PRESENTED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT APPELLANT COMMITTED ATTEMPTED ROBBERY Standard of Review An appellate court applies the de novo standard to review a motion for judgment of acquittal. Johnston v. State, 863 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2003). In Johnston, 863 So. 2d 271, the Florida Supreme Court reviewed the principles that govern a motion for judgment of acquittal: Generally, an appellate court will not reverse a conviction that is supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Pagan, 830 So. 2d at 803 (citing Donaldson v. State, 722 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 1998); Terry v. State, 668 So. 2d 954, 964 (Fla. 1996)). There is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could not find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. See Banks v. State, 732 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999). "A motion for judgment of acquittal should be granted in a circumstantial evidence case if the state fails to present evidence from which the jury can exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt." Orme v. State, 677 So. 2d 258, 262 (Fla. 1996). Argument Appellant and Co-defendant Sanchez were indicted for Firstdegree felony murder as principals. (R. 2). The indictment alleged that Appellant and Sanchez were engaged in an attempt to perpetrate an armed robbery when Borham Dawla was shot and murdered with a firearm, which was possessed and discharged by Sanchez (1)(a)(2)(d)(2013). Id. The jury returned a 9
14 verdict of second degree murder, a lesser included offense. (R. 182). The State was required to prove (1) Appellant intended for the robbery to be committed and (2) that he assisted Sanchez in the commission of the offense. See McBride v. State, 7 So. 3d 1146, 1148 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2009). There are three essential elements to attempt: (1) a specific intent to commit a particular crime; (2) some actual overt step taken, or some overt act done, to actually commit the crime, and (3) a failure to accomplish the intent. Thomas v. State, 531 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1988); (1)(2013). The state maintains that it presented competent substantial evidence that Appellant participated in the underlying attempted robbery. Appellant s statement to police demonstrates that he knew co-defendant Sanchez intended to commit a robbery. (Vol. 6 T ). Appellant s lifelong friend, Brian Rucker, drove Appellant and Sanchez to the location. (Vol. 6 T. 522). He covered his head and followed Sanchez into the store. (Vol. 6. T ). When the interviewing detective asked Appellant why he would get involved, when he knew what was going to happen, Appellant did not deny his involvement, but answered, that it was a stupid thing to do. (V. 6 T Appellant denied knowing Sanchez had a gun, but admitted that he saw Sanchez pull a gun 10
15 on a customer, force him on the ground and take items from his pockets. (V , 530-1,5). Appellant stated that he stood near the customer and touched the items taken from his pockets when Sanchez took his gun off the customer and went to the back of the store. Id. After hearing gun shots, he followed Sanchez as he ran from the back of the store. Id. He and Sanchez got into Rucker s car and attempted to flee. (V. 6 T. 524). Amis El Manlouk testified that he was in his car waiting for another store to open when he saw two African American men walk toward Amigo s, masking themselves. (Vol. 6 T. 460). The first man was carrying a silver revolver. Id. The men were a foot away from each other as they entered the store. Id. Less than 20 seconds later, both men ran out of the store. Id. Miguel Quiroz testified he was shopping at Amigos when a man put a gun to his head and demanded money. (V. 5 T ). He was forced to the ground and $600 American Dollars were taken from his wallet, but his Mexican money was not taken. Id. Mohammad Alam, the owner Amigo s convenience store, testified that his store has four visible surveillance cameras and that Appellant had been a regular customer. (V. 6 T ). Based on the foregoing arguments, the state presented competent substantial evidence to prove Appellant s participation in the attempted robbery. This claim must fail. 11
16 ISSUE III: THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR WHEN IT GRANTED THE JURORS REQUEST TO REVIEW VIDEO WITHOUT FIRST CONSULTING APPELLANT. Appellant acknowledges that he did not object to the jury s request to review the videos of his interview and the surveillance video taken at the time of the crime, but argues it was per se reversible error to respond to a jury s request without first consulting him. Because Appellant and counsel were consulted before the videos were played, this claim is meritless. After deliberations commenced, the jury sent out requests for lunch menus and to see the videotapes. The judge, acknowledging that Appellant was not in the room, asked the prosecutor to warm up the video equipment. (Vol 7. T ). When Appellant and counsel returned to the courtroom, the judge advised them that lunch menus had been sent back to the jury in response to a note. (Vol 7 T.664-5) The judge asked for the note back so it could be shown to Appellant. Id. Apparently, after Defense counsel reviewed the note, he asked, do they want to put the order in before they watch the video? Defense counsel agreed with the prosecutor and the judge that the lunch order should be placed before the jury returned to the court room to review the videos. (V. 7 T ). Defense counsel affirmatively stated he had no objection to this procedure. (V. 7. T ). 12
17 The record reflects that Appellant and counsel were present when the jury was brought back into the courtroom and the videotapes played. (Vol. 7 T ). Appellant cites to Mills v. State, 620 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 1993), arguing it is per se reversible error rule where a trial court responds to a jury's question without giving counsel notice and the opportunity to participate in the discussion of the action to be taken on the jury's request. However, as discussed above, Appellant s counsel did have the opportunity to participate and affirmatively agreed to the procedure before the jury was brought out to review the videos. Under the circumstances of the case at bar, the Mills holding is inapplicable, and therefore, Appellant has not demonstrated any reversible error. 13
18 ISSUE IV: APPELLANT FAILED TO PRESERVE THIS ISSUE FOR APPELLATE REVIEW. THE STATE PRESENTED COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT APPELLANT S CONVICTION FOR SECOND DEGREE FELONY MURDER. Preservation This claim was not preserved for appeal because defense counsel made a bare bones motion for judgment of acquittal, without any specific argument. To preserve an argument for appeal, it must be asserted as the legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below. Stephens v State, 787 So. 2d 747,751 (Fla. 2001). Here, Appellant submitted a boilerplate motion for acquittal without making the specific argument he now makes to this Court: that the state failed to prove the depraved mind element of second degree murder. Therefore, this claim is not cognizable in this Court. Should this Court reach the merits, the state maintains that Appellant s conviction for second degree felony murder was supported by sufficient evidence. Standard of Review An appellate court applies the de novo standard to review a motion for judgment of acquittal. Johnston v. State, 863 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2003). In Johnston, 863 So. 2d 271, the Florida Supreme Court reviewed the principles that govern a motion for judgment of acquittal: Generally, an appellate court will not reverse a conviction that is supported by competent, substantial 14
19 evidence. See Pagan, 830 So. 2d at 803 (citing Donaldson v. State, 722 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 1998); Terry v. State, 668 So. 2d 954, 964 (Fla. 1996)). There is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could not find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. See Banks v. State, 732 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999). "A motion for judgment of acquittal should be granted in a circumstantial evidence case if the state fails to present evidence from which the jury can exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt." Orme v. State, 677 So. 2d 258, 262 (Fla. 1996). Merits Appellant s conviction for second degree felony murder was supported by substantial competent evidence. Appellant was charged under the felony murder statute, which provides that a person may be held responsible for the death of another even though he did not form the intent to kill, if he was engaged in the perpetration of any felony. Santiago v. State, 874 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004). The state was required to establish that Appellant had the specific intent to commit a crime, and that he committed an actual overt act toward committing the crime that went beyond mere preparation. Id. The felony murder rule and the law of principals combine to make a felon liable for the acts of his co-felons. Brinson v. State, 18 So. 3d 1075 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Thus, the focus is not on the Appellant s participation in the murder, but in the 15
20 underlying felony. Hodge v. State, 970 So. 2d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008). As discussed in Issues I and II, the state presented competent substantial evidence that Appellant participated in the attempted robbery at the Amigo conveniences store, and that he was in the store when co-defendant, Sanchez, shot and killed the store clerk. There was no break in the chain of circumstances that begins with the attempted robbery and ending with the murder of the store clerk. See Wagner v. State, 921 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006). As discussed in Issue I and II above, Appellant s childhood friend, Brian Rucker, drove Appellant and co-defendant Sanchez to the location. Appellant masked himself, followed Sanchez into the store, stood near the customer who had been forced to lay face down on the ground, while Sanchez went to the back of the store. After Appellant heard shots fired, he followed co-defendant out of the store, learned that Sanchez shot the store clerk, and got back in Rucker s car and attempted to flee. Therefore, Appellant s claim that that state s evidence was insufficient, must fail. Appellant s relies on Michelson v. State, 805 So. 2d 983, 984 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2001), wherein this Court held there was insufficient evidence to prove second degree felony murder. The case at bar, is distinguishable and therefore it does not support his argument. The day after Michelson escaped from 16
21 prison, he and another escaped convict were driving toward Fort Lauderdale, when he realized a police car was following. Id. Michelson panicked, ran two lights, and within seconds, crashed into a vehicle, killing the driver. Id. Judge Gross noted in his special concurring opinion, that at the time of the death, Michelson was no longer engaged in the perpetration of an escape within the meaning of the felony murder statute. Id. at 986. As discussed in Issue I and II, above, the state present competent substantial evidence that Appellant fully participated in the attempted robbery, an enumerated felony, under Section, (2), Florida Statutes (2013). Therefore his convictism for second degree felony murder should be affirmed by this Court. 17
22 CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing discussions, the State respectfully requests this Honorable Court affirm Appellant's conviction and sentence. Respectfully submitted and certified, PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Laura Fisher By: Laura Fisher ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Florida Bar No Attorney for Appellee, State of Fla. Office of the Attorney General 1515 N. Flagler Drive, Ste. 900 West Palm Beach, FL Primary (561) (561) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to the following by on January 22, 2014, to Melodee A. Smith, Counsel to Appellant, 101 NE 3 rd Avenue, Suite #1500, Fort Lauderdale, Florida at Msmith@SmithCriminalDefense.com. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify that this brief was computer generated using Courier New 12 point font. /s/ Laura Fisher 18
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-1071 Lower Tribunal No. 14-554 Terrence Jefferson,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DANIEL MEDINA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-358 [September 5, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
The State Requests Oral Argument Only if Appellant Argues No. 05-11-00149-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 05/29/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington, Judge. August 16, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-4094 TIMOTHY CLARENCE MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington,
More informationPamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
DARRYL RIDGEWAY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. WAYNE IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington, Judge. September 14, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-4699 THEOPHILUS BESSELLIEU, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RISTO JOVAN WYATT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D12-4377 [ May 20, 2015 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MUSTAFA A. ABDULLA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-2606 [July 5, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Gail E. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD SUMMERALL, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-1256
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JOSEPH DeJESUS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D15-3072 [August 16, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationCASE NO. 1D Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA POUL WESLEY SPRADLING, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JAMES WYATT MCGRIFF, Appellant, CASE NO. 1D13-6204 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed April 8, 2015. An appeal from the Circuit
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CHERRIE YVETTE JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-3741 [March 6, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RUBEN M. TIRADO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D15-802 [May 3, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT EDDIE ISAAC BEAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-2419 [January 9, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationS09A2076. STEVENS v. STATE
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 1, 2010 S09A2076. STEVENS v. STATE BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Daquan Stevens appeals his conviction for malice murder, participation in criminal street gang
More informationSTATE OF OHIO LAVELLE COLEMAN
[Cite as State v. Coleman, 2008-Ohio-2806.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89358 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAVELLE COLEMAN
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Calhoun, 2009-Ohio-6097.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92103 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. WILLIAM CALHOUN
More informationS17A0077. HOLMES v. THE STATE. Appellant Martin Napoleon Holmes appeals his convictions from a
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 15, 2017 S17A0077. HOLMES v. THE STATE. BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Martin Napoleon Holmes appeals his convictions from a multi-victim crime spree which included
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PETERSON BALTAZARE SIMBERT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-1633 [August 23, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for
More informationS17A0711. HODGES v. THE STATE. murder, armed robbery, and two counts of aggravated assault related to the
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 2, 2017 S17A0711. HODGES v. THE STATE. BENHAM, JUSTICE. Appellant Davoris D. Hodges was found guilty of two counts of felony murder, armed robbery, and
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 30 2015 11:00:44 2015-KA-00218-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOE M. GILLESPIE APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00218-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICHAEL EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-3965 [ June 13, 2018 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationCASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA PETER BAPTISTE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-1868
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN TYRONE DEAMON, Appellant THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00458 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN TYRONE DEAMON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge. April 18, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL LEO C. BETTEY JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-0064 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge. April
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING, AND IF FILED, DETERMINED
County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW Search and Seizure Stop. The trial court correctly found the evidence sufficient to support the attempted investigatory stop in this case. Affirmed. Shawn Culver v.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. Platt, 2012-Ohio-5443.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : - vs - : CASE NO. 2012-P-0046 MATTHEW
More informationSTATE OF OHIO MACK THOMAS, JR.
[Cite as State v. Thomas, 2009-Ohio-1784.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91112 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. MACK THOMAS, JR.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT. vs. CASE NO.: 4D
E-Copy Received May 30, 2014 7:17 PM IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JOSE LUIS LOPEZ Appellant, vs. CASE NO.: 4D13-1859 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / REPLY BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES GODSPOWER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-67377 David Bragg,
More informationCASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR.
CASE NO. 05-11-01534-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 01/06/12 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR., Appellant
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge. July 9, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-711 FELICE JOHN VEACH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge. July
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Bruce R. Anderson, Jr., Judge. May 3, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-3275 GARFIELD PLUMMER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Bruce R. Anderson, Jr., Judge.
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ANTONNINE SCOTSMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D15-2729 [February 21, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Nixon, 2007-Ohio-160.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87847 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAKISHA NIXON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MATTHEW ROMANS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D14-4817 [May 31, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TYREEK DENMARK Appellant No. 722 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MACKENDY CLEDENORD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-1566 [ May 23, 2018 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1995 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1995 SESSION FILED November 15,1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, APPELLEE, No. 02-C-01-9503-CC-00093 Gibson
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Glenn, 2009-Ohio-375.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Patricia
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge. February 28, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-1730 DWAYNE PINESTRAW, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.
More informationCASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS
CASE NO. 05-11-01170-CR CASE NO. 05-11-01171-CR IN THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/09/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS ALFONSO
More informationAn appeal from the circuit court for Hamilton County. John W. Peach, Judge.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA R. T. BEVIL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge. May 25, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-5105 TYRONE B. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge. May
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 20 2017 11:34:46 2016-KA-01101-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BENJAMIN MCCADNEY APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01101-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DENTON ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D14-4270 [January 4, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CRAIG ALAN SANDHAUS, Appellant, v. Case
More informationFINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Franklin Chase ( Appellant ) appeals the denial of his Motion to Suppress 1. This court
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 2014-AP-000027-A-O LOWER CASE NO.: 2014-CT-001011-A-O FRANKLIN W. CHASE, v. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HENRY A. JENKINS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-2469
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BRIAN KELLY FLAHERTY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D15-4777 [May 10, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 6, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-09-01040-CR WALLACE C. LEDET, IV, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District Court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOUGLAS BOWERS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOUGLAS BOWERS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County No. S99900047 Charles Lee, Judge No. M1999-00778-CCA-R3-CD
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00186-CR Ramiro Rea, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-10-301285,
More informationNo CR No CR. FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-12-00071-CR No. 05-12-00072-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/27/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant vs.
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Graham, 2008-Ohio-3985.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90437 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : :
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. MAURICE SMITH, Appellee Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 3687 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EARL D. MILLS - July 5, 2005 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No.78215
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY APPELLATE DIVISION
County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Jurors and Jury Instructions. There is no reasonable likelihood that the challenged jury instructions shifted the burden of proof to the defendant for an element
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. William E. Davis, Judge. November 30, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D16-4184 BOBBY ALLEN BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. William E. Davis, Judge.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 21, 2004 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 21, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL A. DRAKE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County No. 98-0898 & 98-0900 John
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD S. BRYSON, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D09-5291
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER 4D LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: CF10A ELYAHU SACHMOROV, Appellant,
E-Copy Received Feb 28, 2014 4:50 PM IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER 4D13-2085 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 10-013621CF10A ELYAHU SACHMOROV, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia ARTHUR RAMBERT v. Record No. 0559-94-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE MARVIN F. COLE COMMONWEALTH
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MAY 5, 2017; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2016-CA-000393-MR ANTONIO ELLISON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE CHARLES
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Hoffner, 2010-Ohio-3128.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- JOHN LEWIS HOFFNER JUDGES Julie A. Edwards, P.J. William B.
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2009-Ohio-2392.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91898 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. WILLIAM TAYLOR
More informationCASE NO. 1D Appellant challenges the circuit court s summary denial of his
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STEPHEN ELLIOT DRAKUS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RUSSELL TERRY McELVAIN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. No. 08-11-00170-CR Appeal from the Criminal District Court Number Two of Tarrant
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST 1996 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST 1996 SESSION STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. 02C01-9510-CR-00304 ) Appellee ) ) SHELBY COUNTY V. ) ) HON. CHRIS CRAFT, ROBERT CHAPMAN, ) JUDGE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Knowles, 2011-Ohio-4477.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : No. 10AP-119 (C.P.C. No. 04CR-07-4891) Alawwal A. Knowles,
More informationIn the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/11/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk Amar Rashad Britton, Appellant v. No. 05-10-01148-CR The State of Texas, Appellee
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2013
WARNER, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2013 JULIANN GUERRERO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D11-1969 [March 13, 2013] In prosecuting the
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE STATE OF MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1547 September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE v. STATE OF MARYLAND Murphy, C.J. Kenney, Byrnes, JJ. Opinion by Murphy, C.J. Filed: November 26, 1997
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JAMES T. GELSOMINO, Appellant, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and BROWN & BROWN, INC., Appellees. No. 4D14-4767 [November 9, 2016] Appeal
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00356-CR Daniel CASAS, Appellant v. The State of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00408-CR Hue-Jun Yandell, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 50,635,
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge. August 24, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-836 TYRONE D. WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARKEL LATRAE BASS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-3284
More information2017 PA Super 417 : : : : : : : : :
2017 PA Super 417 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PATRICK CLINE Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 641 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence August 22, 2016 In the Court of Common
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. RANDALL JOSEPH DAWSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05-10-00488-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS RANDALL JOSEPH DAWSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER 058504 FROM THE 15TH DISTRICT COURT
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 13, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-2986 Lower Tribunal No. 99-993 Mario Gonzalez,
More informationFINAL ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART, REVERSING IN PART. Appellant, Marco Antonio Romero, appeals from his convictions and sentences for
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 2012-AP-15-A-O Lower Case No.: 2011-MM-909-A-A MARCO ANTONIO ROMERO, v. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY SALOMON, Appellant, Case No. 4D17-2610 RECEIVED, 11/29/2017 10:59 AM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal vs. STATE OF
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL J. DOTSKO v. Appellant No. 2580 EDA 2015 Appeal from the
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nathan Robert Prince of Law Office of Adam Ruiz, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CLINT E. BODIE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-5731
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-00-00579-CR Saul Isaac Flores, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 0975372,
More informationNO CR. ALBERTO CONTRERAS, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued August 13, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00424-CR ALBERTO CONTRERAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 179th District
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROLAND FOURNIER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-2922 [April 18, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CHRISTOPHER L. LEISTER, Appellant No. 113 MDA 2015 Appeal from
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Randall, 2008-Ohio-454.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89515 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ALLEN RANDALL DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 25, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-01096-CR EDUARDO CRUZ RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from County Criminal Court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Clay O. Burris, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on November 19, 2013
[Cite as State v. Burris, 2013-Ohio-5108.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 13AP-238 v. : (C.P.C. No. 12CR-01-238) Clay O. Burris, : (REGULAR
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RACHELLE MARIE JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D15-4854 [July 12, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Chambers, 179 Ohio App.3d 770, 2008-Ohio-6973.] STATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT THE STATE OF OHIO, ) CASE NO. 07 BE 44 ) APPELLEE, ) ) V. ) OPINION
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000 SHANTA FONTON MCKAY V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 97-B-786
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2007
SHAHOOD, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2007 ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D05-3782 [May 23, 2007] Appellant, Armando
More informationIn The. Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 10, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00778-CR SAMMIE DARRELL DAVIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 174th District
More informationNos CR & CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant
Nos. 05-11-00304-CR & 05-11-00305-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 8/10/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant v. THE
More information