In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
|
|
- Samson Charles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/11/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk Amar Rashad Britton, Appellant v. No CR The State of Texas, Appellee Trial Number in the 199th District Court of Collin County The Honorable James Fry, Judge Presiding by Assignment STATE S BRIEF Greg Willis Criminal District Attorney Collin County, Texas John R. Rolater, Jr. Asst. Criminal District Attorney Chief of the Appellate Division Oral argument is requested, but only if Appellant is also requesting argument. Emily Johnson-Liu Asst. Criminal District Attorney 2100 Bloomdale Rd., Suite McKinney, TX (972) FAX (214) State Bar No Blake Glover & Bill Dobiyanski Asst. Criminal District Attorneys
2 Table of Contents Index of Authorities... ii Statement of the Case... 1 Statement of Facts... 1 Summary of the State s Arguments... 6 Argument & Authorities... 7 Issue (Sufficiency of the evidence)... 7 The evidence is sufficient to show Appellant placed the victim in fear of imminent bodily injury. Appellant and his accomplice chose the location where they lured the victim it was dark and unfamiliar to him, and they outnumbered him. Furthermore, Appellant himself admitted that he had scared the victim and that he had committed robbery. I. Standard of review... 7 II. The evidence was sufficient to prove robbery... 7 Prayer Certificate of Service i
3 Index of Authorities Cases Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010)... 7 Chambers v. State, 805 S.W.2d 459 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)... 8 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979)... 7 Statutes, Codes, and Rules Tex Pen. Code 29.02(a)... 7 ii
4 Statement of the Case Appellant Amar Britton was indicted for aggravated robbery. CR 9. He pleaded not guilty, and a jury found him guilty of the lesser-included offense of robbery. CR 57. On the jury s recommendation, the trial court sentenced Appellant to 6 years in TDC and a $3,500 fine. CR 69, 71 Statement of Facts Kien Nguyen wanted to buy a cell phone with a touch screen. 3 RR 23. He saw Appellant s listing for one for $100 on craigslist and arranged to meet him. 3 RR 25. At Appellant s request, Kien drove up to Sunflower Lane in Plano. 3 RR 23, 26. It was nighttime after 7 p.m. in November. 3 RR 26. When he arrived, Kien called Appellant several times and, after several failed attempts, finally reached him. 3 RR 26. He then followed Appellant s instructions to drive to the end of the street. 3 RR 26. Appellant and a young woman walked up to Kien s car. 3 RR 27. Kien rolled down the window several inches, and Appellant gave Kien the cell phone to inspect. 3 RR 27. Kien looked it over, found a scratch on the side of the phone, and asked if Appellant would lower the price to $80. 3 RR 28. Appellant agreed. 3 RR 28. Kien returned the phone to Appellant to remove the SIM card and took out his $80 in cash. 3 RR 29. As Appellant took off the back panel of the phone, the woman who Appellant was with reached inside Kien s car to try to take his money. 3 RR 30, Kien told her that he wanted the phone first and refused to let go of the $80. 3 RR 30. 1
5 No words were exchanged between Appellant and the woman. 3 RR But Kien testified that Appellant pointed a gun toward his head through the window of the car. 1 3 RR 31, Because of the gun, Kien was very afraid and released his hold on the money. 3 RR The woman took it. 3 RR 31. When Kien let go of the money, Appellant no longer had the gun to Kien s head. 3 RR 31. Appellant then asked Kien to get out of the car and hand over his wallet. 3 RR 31, 65. Kien stayed put, took the rest of the money from his wallet, and gave it to Appellant. 3 RR 31. Appellant and the woman took the money and ran. 3 RR 33. Kien enlisted the help of his sister Hoai Nguyen and contacted the police. 3 RR Hoai called Appellant s number, pretending to be a potential craigslist buyer, and was told that the cell phone in the ad was still available. 3 RR 76. Kien and his sister turned all the information they had over to Plano police, who connected the craigslist ad to Appellant. 3 RR 84, The police searched Appellant s house but did not find a gun. 3 RR 138. Plano police then interviewed Appellant. SX 4. During the interview, Appellant admitted meeting Kien and showing him the touchscreen phone. SX 4 at 00:55. Appellant insisted that no one else was with him. SX 4 at 00:56:21. The detective told Appellant several times that there was a big difference be- 1 On cross-examination, Kien admitted that it was so dark that he could not identify Appellant, but he still insisted he had seen a gun, though he was never able to provide any more details about it, other than it was black. 3 RR 67-68, 94-95,
6 tween robbery and aggravated robbery and suggested that Appellant tell him if, in fact, there had not been a real gun. SX 4 at 00:48 to 00:50 and 00:52 and 00:56. Appellant responded, as if hypothetically, that, Even if [he] did take [Kien s] money and walk off, he would still get in trouble. SX 4 at 1:00:52. The detective repeated that an aggravated robbery was different than a robbery and that he was giving Appellant an opportunity to explain his way out of an aggravated robbery. SX 4 at 1:01. Whenever the detective suggested that Appellant must have had a gun or something that looked like a gun, Appellant acted as if he were perplexed. SX 4 at 00:50:08 ( I don t understand [what could have looked like a gun]... I had my phone. ) & SX 4 at 1:04:20 to 1:04:40 ( What the hell?... I don t know where [the part about] a gun came from ). Appellant had already told the detective that he took the phone back after letting Kien inspect it. SX 4 at 00:50:22; 3 RR 132. But after the detective again stressed that this was the time to explain if it had not been an aggravated robbery, Appellant then said that Kien had told him, Just take [the $80]; just take it, and Appellant admitted, I just took it. SX 4 at 1:03:27 to 1:03:38. The detective repeated Appellant s claim that he had taken the phone and the money and ran off, and Appellant confirmed, That s what happened. SX 4 at 1:04. When the detective told Appellant another part of Appellant s story was not true (about the cell phone later being conveniently stolen), the following occurred: 3
7 Appellant: I didn t rob anyone. Detective McClendon: Sure you did. Appellant: Ok, that one. SX 4 at 1:07:08. At trial, Appellant testified, and the prosecutor asked him about this admission: Q: You remember at one point in your interview with Detective McClendon you also admitted to this robbery, one time. You remember? A: Me meeting up with Kien Nguyen? Q: Do you remember or do you not? Are you denying it? A: I m denying robbery, yes. Q: That s not my question. Are you denying that one time you admitted to Detective McClendon committing this robbery? A: I think I did, yes. Q: You did admit it, right? A: Yes. 4 RR 90. Appellant s version of events at trial was that his girlfriend had been with him and that, unexpectedly, his girlfriend reached for Kien s money while he was trying to take the SIM card out of the phone. 4 RR He denied having a gun and claimed that he had not robbed Kien at all that the money just flew everywhere when he tried to pull his girlfriend s arm back out of Kien s car window and that they had taken off running. 4 RR But during cross, Appellant admitted the element of fear: 4
8 4 RR 85. Q: You understand and agree, don t you, that you scared Kien? You realize that, don t you? A: Now, yes. Q: And you accept that, right? A: Yeah. Appellant s mother also testified that Appellant had never had a gun and that if there had been a gun in her house, she would have known about it. 4 RR 12, 13. On cross-examination, however, the prosecutor got her to admit she had lied to the detective before Appellant s arrest so that her son could be with her for Thanksgiving. 4 RR The jury was instructed to first consider whether Appellant was guilty of aggravated robbery either as a principal or as a party to his girlfriend s conduct. CR They were instructed to consider next the lesser-included offenses of robbery and theft from a person. CR The jury ultimately returned a guilty verdict on robbery. CR 57. 5
9 Summary of the State s Arguments The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury s guilty verdict for robbery. Although the jury rejected the deadly weapon element when they acquitted Appellant of aggravated robbery, the evidence was nonetheless sufficient for them to believe that Appellant threatened or placed the victim in fear of imminent bodily injury. Appellant and his accomplice chose the location where they lured the victim it was dark and unfamiliar to him, and they outnumbered him. Furthermore, Appellant himself admitted that he had scared the victim and that he had committed robbery. 6
10 Argument & Authorities Issue (Sufficiency of the evidence) The evidence is sufficient to show Appellant placed the victim in fear of imminent bodily injury. Appellant and his accomplice chose the location where they lured the victim it was dark and unfamiliar to him, and they outnumbered him. Furthermore, Appellant himself admitted that he had scared the victim and that he had committed robbery. I. Standard of review In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and determines whether any rational jury could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). II. The evidence was sufficient to prove robbery A person commits robbery if, in the course of committing theft and with intent to obtain or maintain control of the property, he intentionally or knowingly threatens or places another in fear of imminent bodily injury or death. See Tex Pen. Code 29.02(a). Here, Appellant argues that there was insufficient evidence that he placed the victim in fear of imminent bodily injury since the victim testified about a gun, and the jury rejected the deadly-weapon element when they found Appellant guilty only of the lesser offense of robbery. See App. Brief at 3, 13, 27. But just because the jury rejected the allega- 7
11 tion of a deadly weapon does not mean that they rejected the whole of the victim s testimony. As the fact finder, the jury was entitled to judge the credibility of witnesses and could choose to believe only some of their testimony. See Chambers v. State, 805 S.W.2d 459, 461 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). There is no requirement that a single witness provide a cohesive theory of the lesser offense in order to justify conviction for the lesser. Here, the collective testimony from various sources supported Appellant s conviction for robbery. First, the circumstances of the offense even without testimony about the gun could have convinced the jury that Appellant s conduct and complicity in his girlfriend s conduct placed Kien in fear of bodily injury. Appellant lured Kien to the end of the street. It was dark. 3 RR 26. Kien, who lived in Dallas, was unfamiliar with the area. 3 RR 22-23, 26. He was outnumbered. 3 RR 27. Appellant s girlfriend reached her hand inside Kien s car to grab the money, demonstrating that she was willing to use some force to get what she wanted. 3 RR 30. These circumstances of Appellant s and his girlfriend s creation could have easily accounted for Kien s fear for his physical safety. Second, a number of witnesses testified that Kien actually was in fear. Kien Nguyen, his sister, and the responding officer all testified that Kien was shook up or upset after the incident. 4 RR 69 (Kien); 4 RR 75 (Hoai); 4 RR 86, 98 (Officer Waite). And importantly, Appellant connected Kien s fears to his own conduct: he admitted at trial that he knew he had scared Kien. 4 RR 85. This testimony made the evidence legally sufficient to show Appellant 8
12 placed Kien in fear of injury even if the jury disbelieved that a gun was involved. Furthermore, it was rational for the jury to reject the deadly weapon allegation and still believe other parts of Kien s testimony. The jury may have been persuaded by the defense s argument that the State had not proven the gun beyond a reasonable doubt. In closing, defense counsel argued: Now that brings you to the real problem with [Kien s] testimony.... which is[:] it was so dark, so black that he couldn t see [Appellant s] face a foot from him yet in that blackness he saw a black gun.... His story becomes inconsistent and it is certainly inconsistent about the most important point, a black gun, a gun that he can t give you a single detail about either other than it s black.... But he couldn t see [Appellant s] face from a foot away. How do you explain that unless it s not true. It s not true. 4 RR Even the prosecutor admitted in final argument, There s only one real issue here folks, the firearm. That s the only issue in this case because the defendant left with the phone and the money. 4 RR 129. Appellant admitted that he had told the detective that he took the phone and the money. 4 RR 88. So while the jury may have thought Appellant probably had a gun, they may have harbored some doubt about it, and so for this reason they may have acquitted Appellant of aggravated robbery. But the jury was still entitled to believe Appellant s actions (or his actions in assisting his girlfriend) nonetheless caused Kien to fear imminent bodily injury. Appellant s interview with Plano police would have convinced them that there was more to Appellant s conduct than his simply taking 9
13 Kien s money from him without force or threat of force. Appellant as much as admitted he committed robbery with the exchange: [Appellant:] I didn t rob anyone. [Officer:] Sure you did. [Appellant:] Ok, that one. SX 4 at 1:07:08. If the jury thought that Kien might have been mistaken about the gun, there was still plenty of evidence that he was reacting in fear caused by Appellant s and his girlfriend s conduct from the location they selected, to the fact that there were two of them, and to their demonstrated use of physical force. Alternatively, the jury may have had a different theory in mind altogether when they convicted Appellant of robbery a robbery that occurred after Appellant had pulled a gun on Kien. They may have believed Appellant s testimony, in part, that he was surprised by his girlfriend s actions in taking Kien s $80 in the first place. 4 RR They may also have believed defense counsel s suggestion during Kien s cross-examination that Appellant then used the gun solely to protect his girlfriend. 3 RR 55, But they could have convicted Appellant for his conduct thereafter. According to Kien, Appellant asked for the remainder of the money in his wallet after the woman took the first $80. 3 RR 31-32, 65. Kien had testified that after he released his hold on the $80 and the woman took that money, Appellant was no longer holding a gun to his head. 3 RR 31, lines The jury was entitled to find that Appellant was no longer using the gun (and thus there was no aggravated robbery) but his conduct in asking for the rest of Kien s money nonetheless constituted robbery. Under these facts, it is easy to conclude that Appellant had 10
14 placed Kien in fear of imminent bodily injury or death since Appellant had already threatened deadly force against him. Either way, the evidence is legally sufficient to convict Appellant of robbery, and Appellant s sole issue should be overruled. 11
15 Prayer Appellant s trial was without prejudicial error. The State prays that this Court will affirm Appellant s conviction and sentence. Respectfully submitted, Greg Willis Criminal District Attorney Collin County, Texas John R. Rolater, Jr. Asst. Criminal District Attorney Chief of the Appellate Division /s/ Emily Johnson-Liu Emily Johnson-Liu Asst. Criminal District Attorney 2100 Bloomdale Rd., Suite McKinney, TX State Bar No (972) FAX (214) Certificate of Service The State has sent a true copy of its brief by first-class mail to counsel for Appellant, Mark Heidenheimer, 2208 Wisteria Way, McKinney, TX 75071, on this, the 9th day of March /s/ Emily Johnson-Liu Asst. Criminal District Attorney 12
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JOHN PAUL CHARO, Appellant No. 05-11-00423-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Lisa Matz, Clerk 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 07-16-2012 Trial
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
The State Requests Oral Argument Only if Appellant Argues No. 05-11-00149-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 05/29/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk
More informationCASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS
CASE NO. 05-11-01170-CR CASE NO. 05-11-01171-CR IN THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/09/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS ALFONSO
More informationCASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR.
CASE NO. 05-11-01534-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 01/06/12 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS JAMES ALLEN BALL, JR., Appellant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS MARISOL ZUNIGA MURILLO, Appellant NO. 05-10-00869-CR VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NUMBER
More informationNo CR No CR. FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-12-00071-CR No. 05-12-00072-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/27/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant vs.
More informationNo CR. JOSE RAUL REYNA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
Oral argument requested. No. 05 09 00261 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JOSE RAUL REYNA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN TYRONE DEAMON, Appellant THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00458 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN TYRONE DEAMON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas
More informationNos CR & CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant
Nos. 05-11-00304-CR & 05-11-00305-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 8/10/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant v. THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS. * * * * Cause No CR. * * * * CORNELL CORDELL DALLAS, Appellant. vs.
ACCEPTED 225EFJ016914678 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 June 6 P12:34 Lisa Matz CLERK ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/07/2012 9:56:43 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
More informationIn the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. v. Nos CR CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas RENE LOPEZ, JR., Appellant v. Nos. 05-09-00044-CR 05-09-00045-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Trial Numbers 380-81309-07 and 380-81310-07
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER CR. ROBERT AMARO, JR., Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER 05-10-00508-CR ROBERT AMARO, JR., Appellant vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Number 1 Grayson
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 30 2015 11:00:44 2015-KA-00218-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOE M. GILLESPIE APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00218-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DANIEL MEDINA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-358 [September 5, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MUSTAFA A. ABDULLA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-2606 [July 5, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationSTATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT ANGEL AGUILAR, 05-12-00219-CR APPELLANT V. NOS. & THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 05-12-00220-CR 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/27/2012 14:00
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. RANDALL JOSEPH DAWSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05-10-00488-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS RANDALL JOSEPH DAWSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER 058504 FROM THE 15TH DISTRICT COURT
More informationNo CR. JESUS MANUEL GASPAR, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-12-00121-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/12/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk JESUS MANUEL GASPAR, Appellant vs. THE STATE OF
More informationS09A2076. STEVENS v. STATE
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 1, 2010 S09A2076. STEVENS v. STATE BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Daquan Stevens appeals his conviction for malice murder, participation in criminal street gang
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. BRADFORD D. SIMS, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05 10 00460 CR The State Requests Oral Argument if Appellant Requests Oral Argument. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS BRADFORD D. SIMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. ANTHONY SHANE KILLEBREW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed March 16, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01511-CR ANTHONY SHANE KILLEBREW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On
More informationNo CR. RICHARD HARRIS, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF
No. 05-11-01006-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/01/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk RICHARD HARRIS, Appellant vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS,
More informationNo CR STATE S BRIEF
Appellant Has Not Requested Oral Argument; State Waives Argument No. 05-09-00321-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JASON WESLEY WILLINGHAM, APPELLANT vs. THE STATE OF
More informationSTATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT EDGAR CARRASCO, APPELLANT NO. 05-11-00681-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 12/28/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00349-CR Matthew Shane Cox, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO.
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS ON APPEAL FROM THE 401 ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
NO. 05-10-01325-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 7/19/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS NATHAN JOHN ELLIS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF A.C., A CHILD
NO. 05-11-01469-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/21/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE MATTER OF A.C., A CHILD th On appeal from
More informationNOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NOS. 12-17-00298-CR 12-17-00299-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DONALD RAY RUNNELS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEALS FROM THE 123RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationIn the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
In the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas TEOFILIA ALEJANDRO SALGADO Appellant v. No. 05-10-00638-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Trial Number 004-88060-09 in the County Court at
More informationSTATE OF OHIO MACK THOMAS, JR.
[Cite as State v. Thomas, 2009-Ohio-1784.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91112 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. MACK THOMAS, JR.
More informationS18A1609. STANFORD v. THE STATE. evidence was presented to support a finding of guilt. For the reasons that
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 4, 2019 S18A1609. STANFORD v. THE STATE. BENHAM, Justice. In February 2015, Appellant Larry Stanford was convicted of two counts of malice murder in connection
More informationSTATE OF OHIO LAVELLE COLEMAN
[Cite as State v. Coleman, 2008-Ohio-2806.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89358 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAVELLE COLEMAN
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Nixon, 2007-Ohio-160.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87847 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAKISHA NIXON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationNos CR & CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CURTIS HEATH, Appellant.
Nos. 05 10 01084 CR & 05 10 01085 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 6/15/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk CURTIS HEATH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NO. 12-16-00139-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ROY EDWARD SMITH, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE 114TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SMITH
More informationNos CR, CR, CR, CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
Nos. 05 11 00799 CR, 05 11 00800 CR, 05 11 00801 CR, 05 11 00802 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 11/1/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk CODY ANTHONY
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-1071 Lower Tribunal No. 14-554 Terrence Jefferson,
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00356-CR Daniel CASAS, Appellant v. The State of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RUBEN M. TIRADO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D15-802 [May 3, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
More informationNO CR. RAFAELA DAVILA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued February 11, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00176-CR RAFAELA DAVILA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 400th District Court
More informationS17A0711. HODGES v. THE STATE. murder, armed robbery, and two counts of aggravated assault related to the
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 2, 2017 S17A0711. HODGES v. THE STATE. BENHAM, JUSTICE. Appellant Davoris D. Hodges was found guilty of two counts of felony murder, armed robbery, and
More informationRENDERED: AUGUST 30, 2002; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO CA MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY OPINION AFFIRMING ** ** ** ** **
RENDERED: AUGUST 30, 2002; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED C ommonwealth Of K entucky Court Of A ppeals NO. 2001-CA-002226-MR JAMES ROBINSON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JOHN
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES GODSPOWER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-67377 David Bragg,
More informationCAUSE NOS CR and CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
CAUSE NOS. 05-11-01408-CR and 05-11-01409-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/07/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk DANIEL LEE MORLEY
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1995 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1995 SESSION FILED November 15,1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, APPELLEE, No. 02-C-01-9503-CC-00093 Gibson
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia ARTHUR RAMBERT v. Record No. 0559-94-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE MARVIN F. COLE COMMONWEALTH
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Opinion filed June 25, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00134-CR RICHARD GENE SOLOMON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A OCTOBER 20, 2011 JASON EUGENE WALKER, APPELLANT
NO. 07-10-0299-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A OCTOBER 20, 2011 JASON EUGENE WALKER, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE 396 TH DISTRICT
More informationJames Elijah Calloway v. State of Maryland, No. 2701, September Term, 2000
HEADNOTE: James Elijah Calloway v. State of Maryland, No. 2701, September Term, 2000 CLOSING ARGUMENT A prosecutor may comment on race if in legitimate response to an argument made on behalf of the defendant.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ROBERTO CASTILLO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. No. 08-11-00142-CR Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of El Paso County, Texas
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SHANE BERNARD VITKA, JR., Appellant No. 1985 WDA 2014 Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0227-16 CESAR ALEJANDRO GAMINO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS TARRANT COUNTY
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2000 SHANTA FONTON MCKAY V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 97-B-786
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. BRIAN ALLEN MORROW, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NOS. 05-11-00439-CR, 05-11-00440-CR, 05-11-00441-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 11/14/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk BRIAN ALLEN MORROW,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EARL D. MILLS - July 5, 2005 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No.78215
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. BRUCE GLENN MILNER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued December 18, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00501-CR BRUCE GLENN MILNER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MCE [2015] QCA 4 PARTIES: R v MCE (appellant) FILE NO: CA No 186 of 2014 DC No 198 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00688-CR Sammie Meredith, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2020286,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JESUS CASTILLO, Appellant, V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. O P I N I O N No. 08-08-00332-CR Appeal from the 346th Judicial District Court of El
More informationNO CR. JOHN KENNETH SUTTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued December 4, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00776-CR JOHN KENNETH SUTTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 230th District
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. PD-0712-15 PD-0712-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/8/2015 1:19:53 PM Accepted 7/9/2015 4:28:04 PM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS DYLAN JEZREEL
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. EDUARDO ESCOBAR GARCIA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 01122 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS EDUARDO ESCOBAR GARCIA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 203d Judicial District Court of Dallas
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS INOCENCIO M. VILLASENOR, APPELLANT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
No. 05-10-00969-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS The State requests oral argument if Appellant argues. 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 4/8/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk INOCENCIO
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. MATTHEW JAMES ACHEAMPONG, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued October 8, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00907-CR MATTHEW JAMES ACHEAMPONG, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 209th District
More informationNO CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS LINH PHUONG NGUYEN, APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
NO. 05-10-01204-CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/29/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS LINH PHUONG NGUYEN, APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 15, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-15-00965-CR TRACEY DEE CALVIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 405th District
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-172-CR STEVE R. KING APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00360-CR DARRELL CRAIG ADAMS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTONIO BRIGGS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTONIO BRIGGS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 96-09730, W. Fred Axley, Trial Judge No. W1999-00280-CCA-R3-CD
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-258-CR RODNEY PERKINS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Gail E. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD SUMMERALL, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-1256
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 2 2016 17:00:55 2015-KA-00934-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JASON BOZEMAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00934-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued July 25, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-01096-CR EDUARDO CRUZ RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from County Criminal Court
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington, Judge. August 16, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-4094 TIMOTHY CLARENCE MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 16, 2004
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 16, 2004 DARRELL JONES, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 244008 Stephen
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No CR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 05-08-01635-CR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CARLUS DEMARCUS GATSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee * * * * * * * *
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. INOCENCIO M. VILLASENOR, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00969 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS INOCENCIO M. VILLASENOR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 3 of Dallas
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0123-15 JAMES FERNANDEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS VAL VERDE COUNTY
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. LAKEITH FOWLER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 00893 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 4/15/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk LAKEITH FOWLER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DAVID HOLUNGER, APPEAL FROM THE 114TH
NO. 12-93-00080-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DAVID HOLUNGER, APPEAL FROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE SMITH COUNTY,
More informationEleventh Court of Appeals
Opinion filed August 5, 2010 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals No. 11-09-00041-CR ARNOLD P. POWERS, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Tarrant County,
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JAMES RALPH JOHNSON, APPELLANT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
The State requests oral argument only if Appellant argues No. 05-09-00278-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JAMES RALPH JOHNSON, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
More information20 South Second Street 8026 Woodstream Drive, NW Fourth Floor Canal Winchester, OH Newark, OH 43055
[Cite as State v. Meek, 2009-Ohio-3448.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- DAVID MEEK Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. Julie A. Edwards,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 30, 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 30, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SCOTT G. CLEVENGER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Grainger County No. 4190 O. Duane
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 25 MDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RICHARD CLARK STEWART Appellant No. 25 MDA 2014 Appeal from the
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00430-CR DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00360-CR JOHNNIE THEDDEUS GARDNER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00186-CR Ramiro Rea, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-10-301285,
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A128585
Filed 3/10/11 P. v. Youngs CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 6, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-09-01040-CR WALLACE C. LEDET, IV, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District Court
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. JOSE MANUEL MORALES, Appellant
No. 05-09-00182-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/12/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk JOSE MANUEL MORALES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPEAL
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE STATE OF MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1547 September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE v. STATE OF MARYLAND Murphy, C.J. Kenney, Byrnes, JJ. Opinion by Murphy, C.J. Filed: November 26, 1997
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 21, 2004 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 21, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL A. DRAKE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County No. 98-0898 & 98-0900 John
More informationIn The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CR. DERRICK CARDELL MCLEOD, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued May 29, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00337-CR DERRICK CARDELL MCLEOD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 232nd District
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS WILLIAM LESTER SEEYLE, APPELLANT No. 05-09-00615-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEALED FROM CAUSE NUMBER 219-82020-08 IN THE 219 TH
More informationS.C. Case No Defendant-Appellant. Pro Se Appellant IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee, -vs- MICAH BRAY Defendant-Appellant S.C. Case No. 2011-2007 On Appeal from the Clark County Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District Court
More informationNO CR CR CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B
NO. 07-05-0300-CR 07-05-0301-CR 07-05-0302-CR 07-05-0303-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 12, 2007 JOSE GEORGE GONZALES, JR., APPELLANT V. THE STATE
More informationIn The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS. Dallas, Texas )( )( )( )( BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW
In The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS Dallas, Texas 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/21/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk KAAREAM G. WASHINGTON, Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee Nos. 05-10-00571-CR, 05-10- 00572-CR,
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. RICHARD DAVID EASON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05 10 01232 CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 11/10/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk RICHARD DAVID EASON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
More informationNo CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
No. 05-08-00491--CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CURTIS DEWAYNE CRISS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204 th Judicial District Court of Dallas
More information