Bank of America Study of High Net-Worth Philanthropy Initial Report. Researched and Written by
|
|
- Aubrey Bradley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bank of America Study of High Net-Worth Philanthropy Initial Report Researched and Written by October 2006
2 Bank of America The Philanthropic Management group within Bank of America delivers expertise and a comprehensive suite of investment, planned giving, grantmaking and charitable management services to help our clients build and sustain their missions. Our clients include philanthropic individuals and families and nonprofit institutions for which we seamlessly integrate philanthropy into a broader financial relationship. We focus on effective and efficient philanthropy for both donors and the nonprofits they support. Over 9,000 philanthropic institutions, individuals and families entrust us with over $30 billion in assets (as of 1/1/06). The Center on Philanthropy Every culture depends on philanthropy and nonprofit organizations to provide essential elements of a civil society. Effective philanthropy and nonprofit management are instrumental in creating and maintaining public confidence in the philanthropic traditions--voluntary association, voluntary giving, and voluntary action. The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University increases the understanding of philanthropy and improves its practice through programs in research, teaching, public service, and public affairs. The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University is a part of the IU School of Liberal Arts at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. The Center has academic and research programs on the IUPUI and the IU-Bloomington campuses. The Study of High Net-Worth Philanthropy Center on Philanthropy Project Team Patrick M. Rooney, Ph.D., Director of Research and Principal Investigator Heidi K. Frederick, Assistant Director of Research and Project Manager Melissa S. Brown, Associate Director of Research Eugene R. Tempel, Ed.D., CFRE, Executive Director Graduate Assistants: Emily Krauser, Taka Yoshioka, Xing Wei, and Christine Weisenbach Editorial Review Board Cary Grace, Managing Director, National Philanthropic Management Leader, Bank of America Ramsay Slugg, Senior Vice President, National Philanthropic Management Practice, Bank of America Kerry H. Sullivan, Senior Vice President, Grantmaking Executive, Bank of America Paul Bombard, Senior Vice President, Global Wealth & Investment Management Segment Marketing, Bank of America Research Methodology Committee Study of High Net-Worth Philanthropy Richard S. Steinberg, Ph.D., Professor of Economics and Philanthropic Studies, IUPUI Mark Wilhelm, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Economics and Philanthropic Studies, IUPUI Patrick Rooney, Ph.D., Professor of Economics and Philanthropic Studies, IUPUI Heidi K. Frederick, Staff Support The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University 550 W. North St., Suite 301 Indianapolis, IN Bank of America Philanthropic Management 100 Federal Street Boston, MA Trustees of Indiana University 2
3 High Net-Worth households, those with incomes of greater than $200,000 or assets in excess of $1,000,000, represent 3.1 percent of the total households in the United States. This very small number of households has an enormously disproportionate impact on charitable giving they are responsible for approximately two-thirds of all household charity in this country. The Bank of America Study of High Net-Worth Philanthropy is the most in-depth quantitative study of those households aimed at understanding not only their charitable practices, but also the motivations behind them. Bank of America, one of the leading providers to both philanthropic individuals and institutions, partnered with the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, one of the nation s leading academic centers for the study and practice of philanthropy. Based on a random survey of over 30,000 households in high net-worth neighborhoods across the country, this landmark study has major implications for the philanthropic sector: those who donate, the nonprofits that benefit from those donations, and the financial institutions that support them. These are the initial findings from the study. Figure 1 Allocation of Total Donations from High-Income Households, 2005 Total estimated donations: $126 billion Arts $ % Other $ % Religion $ % Education $ % Fund & Foundations $ % Disaster $ % Basic Needs $ % Health $ % Combination $ % 3
4 High net-worth households, as a group, allocate their philanthropic contributions quite differently than the U.S. general population. For the general population, the majority of donations are directed towards religious organizations. However, most high net-worth household donations are given to organizations that serve a combination of purposes, such as the United Way, or to foundations, funds, or trusts. High net-worth households also give a disproportionately larger percentage of their donations to educational and arts and cultural organizations. Figure 2 Estimated Distributions of Household Giving by Type of Recipient, High Net-Worth and U.S. Household Comparison 60.0 High Net-Worth U.S Religion Disaster* Combination & Fund *No national comparison for disaster giving Basic needs Health Education Arts Other *National Data: Center on Philanthropy Panel Study 2003, latest yr. available Table 1: High Net-Worth Household Giving by the Type of Organization Receiving Funding (donor households only) Percent of HNW Donors Giving to Avg. HNW Median HNW Avg. U.S. Median U.S. subsectos Total giving 2 (excluding disasters) 98 $117,488 $15,500 $1,917 $700 Disaster giving 71 $5,038 $1, Total giving (with disasters) 98 $120,651 $16, Secular giving 97 $102,553 $10,000 $863 $302 Religious giving 72 $20,530 $4,000 $1,769 $600 Fund giving 33 $114,683 $5,000 $130 $200 Combo giving 60 $7,750 $1,000 Basic giving 75 $4,550 $1,000 $457 $100 Health giving 70 $21,257 $975 $298 $100 Education giving 80 $25,852 $2,000 $416 $100 Arts giving 70 $16,567 $1,000 $215 $100 Other giving 55 $12,716 $1,000 $311 $100 4
5 Average total giving to charity by high net-worth households is greatly influenced by the amount given to foundations or funds. Average total giving, with giving to foundations and funds included, is $120,651 and decreases by nearly $40,000 to $82,850 when giving to foundations and funds factored out. Table 2 Average Total Giving with and without Fund Giving Average Giving Total giving with fund giving $120,651 Total giving without fund giving $82,850 To every type of organization, a higher proportion of high net-worth households made a donation than U.S. general population households. More than 67 percent of U.S. households donate to charity, but nearly 98 percent of high net-worth households donated to a charitable organization in An even higher percentage of high net-worth households donated to religion than U.S. general population households (72% versus 45%). Figure 3 Estimated Percentage of Households that Donated to Charity by Recipient Subsector, High Net-Worth and U.S. Households 98.0 High Net-Worth U.S Total giving Disaster Religious Fund & giving giving Combo giving Note: No national comparison for disaster fund giving Basic giving Health giving Education giving Arts giving Other giving 5
6 Meeting critical needs, giving back to society, and social reciprocity (the feeling that those who have more should help those with less) led as key motivators for charitable giving by high networth households. Limiting funds to heirs, leaving a legacy, charity as making good business sense, and a social network expectation were all ranked as less important motivations for giving to charity by high net-worth households. Figure 4 Important Motivations for Charitable Giving by High Net-Worth Households Limit funds to heirs 8.0 Leaving a legacy Makes good business sense Expected in social network Religious beliefs 57.0 Identification with causes Set an example Being asked Nonprofits should provide services gov't cannot Bring about a desired impact Reciprocity Giving back to society Meet critical needs
7 In the survey, households were also asked what factors would cause them to give more to charity. By far, high net-worth households told us that if charities spent more on helping the constituencies they serve and spent less on administrative and fundraising expenses, then they would give more to charity. High net-worth households also told us that they would give more to charity if they were able to determine the impact of their gifts, if they felt more financially secure, and if they received a better return on their financial investments. Figure 5 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households Reporting They Would Give More to Charity If the Following Occurred Not already leaving donations in estate Able to compare notes with peers Less legal red tape More time Name would not be made public More info. on giving vehicles Understood goals of nonprofits More access to research Able to use skills in nonprofits Knew of more orgs Not already financially committed 40.2 Better Return on Investments 46.6 More financially secure 52.7 Able to determine impact of gifts 58.3 Less money were spent on admin Just over 40 percent of high net-worth households have a provision in their wills for charity. Almost 20 percent of high net-worth households have established a foundation and nearly 16 percent have established a donor-advised fund Figure 6 Vehicles Used in Donations by High Net-Worth Households (percent) Provision in Will IRA or Retirement Account Life Insurance Policies Split Interest Trusts Foundation Donor-Advised Funds 7
8 Just under one-third of all high net-worth households donate stocks or mutual funds to charity and almost two-thirds participated in a major charitable campaign, such as a capital campaign, in Figure 7 Vehicles Used in Donations (Continued) (percent) Stocks or Mutual Funds Non-Financial Physical Asset Family-Owned Business Other Types of Groups (such as giving circles) Major Campaign A very high proportion of high net-worth households also donate their time to charity. Many, 61.1 percent, serve on a board of directors for a nonprofit organization, and 61.8 percent have volunteered to help charities raise funds. Figure 8 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households Volunteering by Volunteer Activity Board of Directors Volunteer with any Nonprofit Volunteer for Fundraising Activity Volunteering to Help Plan an Event 8
9 Changes in income or wealth for high net-worth households are statistically associated with changes in their charitable giving. Most high net-worth households saw a slight increase in their income over the past five years and even more households reported a slight increase in their wealth. This slight increase in income or wealth corresponds with a slight increase in their charitable giving over the same time period. Figure 9 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households Reporting Changes in Giving, Income, and Wealth over the Past Five Years Change in Giving Change in Income Change in Wealth Decreased Dramatically Somewhat Decreased Stayed the Same Somewhat Increased Increased Dramatically 9
10 In the general US population, educational attainment is correlated with charitable giving levels. The more education a person receives, the more they give to charity even when controlling for differences in income and wealth. This is not the case in high net-worth households. Educational attainment is not associated with their giving levels. On average, of those high networth households contributing to charity, individuals with a high school diploma or less contribute more to charity, $233,642. However, the median amount donated by those with a postgraduate degree, $16,365, was larger than those with less education. Figure 10 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Education Level, High Net-Worth and U.S. Households, 2005 (donor households only) $233,642 High Net-Worth Households $228,104 High school or less College attendee Bachelor's degree Postgraduate degree U.S. General Population $146,783 $130,137 $101,427 $87,073 $71,003 $41,333 $19,287 $22,656 $20,585 $7,200 $1,050 $1,649 $2,456 $3,571 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving U.S. Total Giving 10
11 The frequency with which high net-worth households attend religious services is statistically associated with average total and religious giving. Of those high net-worth households that donated to charity in 2005, those that do not attend religious services on average gave more to secular causes than those that did attend services. Those who attend religious services once a week gave the highest average amount to religious causes, $32,878. Figure 11 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Religious Service Attendance, High Net-Worth Households, 2005 (donor households only) $214,050 $213,700 Do not attend Once or twice every year Once or twice every six months Once or twice a month Once a week More than once a week $109,533 $102,580 $86,225 $59,142 $52,059 $93,942 $77,190 $69,104 $54,648 $29,478 $26,583 $32,878 $22,991 $2,033 $9,223 $5,733 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving 11
12 Age is often a predictor of charitable giving in the general population; however, age does not seem to be a strong predictor of the philanthropy of high net-worth households. Average total, secular, and religious giving increases with age until age 70. After age 70, average and median giving levels decrease. Median religious giving, however, is very similar across all ages ($3,000-$4,000). Figure 12 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Age Range, High Net-Worth and U.S. Households, 2005 (donor households only) $155,066 $142,192 $125,061 $102,726 High Net-Worth Households $131,252 $130,532 $119, and younger and older U.S. General Population $84,672 $42,387 $33,257 $33,143 $25,330 $12,450 $15,229 $9,094 $2,328 $1,613 $2,160 $2,611 $1,400 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving U.S. Total Giving 12
13 In studies of the general population, the number of children has a differential impact on average giving levels. Of the high net-worth households that gave to charity in 2005, those with four children gave on average the highest dollar amount to charity, $163,093 and most of those dollars were donated to secular causes. Figure 13 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Number of Children, High Net-Worth and U.S. Households, 2005 (donor households only) $163,093 $113,645 $100,492 $79,218 $74,529 High Net-Worth Households $155,937 $96,132 $85,835 $75,866 No Children One Child Two Children Three Children Four Children Five or more Children U.S. General Population $52,904 $52,567 $28,412 $34,843 $30,514 $26,181 $9,745 $4,469 $8,552 $2,001 $2,096 $2,669 $1,874$1,941 $583 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving U.S. Total Giving 13
14 Wealth is also an important characteristic when understanding differences in high net-worth households philanthropy. Wealth is statistically associated with giving levels. In general, as net worth increases, so does a household s level of charitable giving. Of the high net-worth households that donated to charity in 2005, those with net worth of more than $50 million gave, by far, the highest average amount overall, to secular causes, and religious organizations, although the increase in average giving to religious organizations is not as pronounced. Figure 14 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Net Worth, High Net-Worth Households, 2005 (donor households only) $1,129,674 $1,017,420 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving $147,149 $134,285 $224,973 $191,734 $159,328 $7,600 $21,677 $27,116 $37,062 $18,506 $20,142 $27,997 $4,907 $3,590 $4,184 $9,253 $13,235 $16,861 $47,262 Less than $1 million $1 million- $2 million $2 million- $5 million $5 million- $10 million $10 million- $20 million $20 million- $50 million $50 million or more 14
15 A dramatic decrease in wealth over the last five years did not decrease the average amount donated to secular causes. Dramatic decreases in wealth are associated with higher levels of average and median giving, while slight decreases in wealth are associated with the lowest levels of giving. Figure 15 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Change in Wealth, High Net-Worth Households, 2005 (donor households only) $121,216 $132,954 $141,298 $111,136 $126,323 Dramatically Decreased Somewhat Decreased Stayed the Same Somewhat Increased Dramatically Increased $100,454 $84,733 $66,575 $57,403 $34,660 $16,481 $23,625 $20,851 $12,960 $10,314 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving 15
16 Sources of net-worth had a dramatic impact on the average total amount given to charity by high net-worth households. High net-worth households with 50 percent or more of their net-worth coming from entrepreneurship contributed to charity, on average, $232,206. In contrast, households with 50 percent of their net-worth coming from appreciated real estate contributed on average $11,015. In all three categories (total giving, secular giving, and religious giving), households with net-worth coming from entrepreneurship gave much more than all other sources of wealth. On the other hand, households with net-worth coming from real estate gave less to secular and religious causes than those whose wealth came from all other sources of wealth. Figure 16 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by the Source of Net- Worth, High Net-Worth Households, 2005 (donor households only) $232,206 $185,646 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving $109,745 $101,253 $84,882 $54,913 $40,926 $45,523 $69,978 $63,205 $12,068 $9,675 $11,015 $7,372$5,667 Inheritance Savings Entrepreneurship Return on Income (ROI) Real Estate 16
17 As might be expected, on average, the more secure respondents felt about their finances, the more they donated to charities. Similarly, those reporting extreme insecurity with respect to their finances gave the least amount, on average, in the three categories (total giving, secular giving, and religious giving). Those reporting extreme security in terms of their finances gave, on average, by far the most in total giving ($220,217) and also gave, on average, by far the most in secular giving ($200,609). Figure 17 Average Total, Secular, and Religious Giving by Financial Security, High Net-Worth Households, 2005 (donor households only) $123,917 $220,217 $200,609 Extremely Insecure Very Insecure Somewhat Insecure Somewhat Secure Very Secure Extremely Secure $91,846 $59,096 $51,858 $44,584 $30,825 $30,966 $25,896 $16,567 $13,567 $40,186 $41,863 $25,122 $4,500 $7,640$9,699 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving 17
18 High-net worth households residing in metropolitan locations tend to give, on average, more than rural or non-metropolitan dwellers. When comparing the average giving of rural, nonmetropolitan, and metropolitan high net-worth households to the average giving of the U.S. general population, the overall U.S. population exhibits similar patterns but on a much lower scale than the high net-worth households. $125,556 Figure 18 Average Giving by Residence Location, High Net-Worth and U.S. Households, 2005 (donor households only) High Net-Worth Households $114,751 Rural Non-metropolitan Metropolitan U.S. General Population $81,759 $83,836 $61,894$61,309 $25,094$24,333 $15,051 $1,419 $1,651 $1,988 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving U.S. Total Giving 18
19 Higher levels of volunteering by high net-worth households are associated with higher total giving levels. The exception to this is religious giving, which seems to vary unpredictably with the number of hours volunteered. On average, non-volunteers gave slightly more than lowfrequency volunteers. After 50 hours of volunteering, higher levels of volunteer hours translates into higher total and secular giving. Figure 19 Average Giving by Volunteer Hours from 2005 $132,086 Total Giving Secular Giving Religious Giving $104,691 $118,461 $92,717 $95,177 $59,962 $48,956 $51,232 $32,643 $26,242 $31,092 $26,908 $5,380 $11,773 $17,632 No Volunteering 1-50 hours hours hours 201 hours or more 19
20 Most high net-worth households are either somewhat satisfied, 44.8 percent, or very satisfied, 42.9 percent, with the impact of their charitable donations. No high net-worth households reported they were extremely dissatisfied. Figure 20 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households' Satisfaction with the Impact of Their Charitable Giving Extremely Dissatisfied 0.0 Extremely Satisfied 4.0 Very Dissatisfied 2.4 Somewhat Dissatisfied 5.9 Very Satisfied 42.9 Somewhat Satisfied
21 High net-worth households were also asked questions about how changes in tax law would impact their charitable giving. High net-worth households responded that their charitable giving would mostly stay the same if the estate tax were repealed and would stay the same or somewhat decrease if they received zero income tax deductions for their charitable contributions. Figure 21 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households Reporting a Change in the Amount Left to Charity in an Estate Plan if the Estate Tax Were Repealed Not Applicable, 3.0 Don't Know, 5.8 Dramatically Decrease 1.6 Somewhat Decrease, 3.9 Dramatically Increase 13.7 Somewhat Increase 15.8 Stay the Same 56.1 Figure 22 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households Reporting a Change in Charitable Giving If They Received Zero Income Tax Deductions for Their Donations Somewhat Increase 0.9 Dramatically Increase, 0.2 Don't Know, 2.1 Dramatically Decrease 7.0 Stay the Same 51.7 Somewhat Decrease
22 When asked about the type of advisors consulted when making charitable decision, a higher proportion of high net-worth households reported consulting fundraisers or other personnel from nonprofit organizations than any other group of advisors. Figure 23 Percentage of High Net-Worth Households That Consulted Others when Making Charitable Giving Decisions by Type of Person Consulted, 2005 Coaching programs 3.7 Broker 7.1 Bank or Trust Co. staff 8.7 Others 12.3 Foundation staff 15.2 Attorney 16.4 Financial / Wealth Advisor 16.6 Accountant 26.6 Peers or peer networks 35.9 Fundraisers / Nonprofit Staff 41.2 Just over 70 percent of high net-worth households discuss their philanthropy with their children. Approximately 35 percent allow children to participate. Figure 24 Percentage of Households Reporting Participation in Philanthropy Do Don't Discuss with Children Allow Children to Participate Establish Criteria for Children s Participation Give Children Funds 22
23 Study Overview The purpose of the Bank of America Study on High Net-Worth Philanthropy was to assess charitable giving and philanthropic activities of high income and high net-worth households. The study consisted of mail surveys randomly distributed to 30,000 households in high net-worth areas of the United States (those where the average amount of investable net assets were $3 million or more). The project s principal investigator was Dr. Patrick Rooney, and the study s project manager was Heidi Frederick, both from the Center on Philanthropy Indiana University. Indiana University Center for Survey Research (CSR) implemented the survey. Kellie McGiverin-Bohan was the CSR project manager for the survey. John Kennedy, the CSR director, and Nancy Bannister, the associate director, oversaw the fielding of the survey. Analysis procedures were overseen by the study s methodology committee consisting of economists, Drs. Mark Wilhelm, Rich Steinberg, and Patrick Rooney, all from the Department of Economics at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). The Questionnaire For this report, the CSR mailed and received questionnaires between June 7, 2006 and September 26, Total giving questions were modeled after the philanthropy questions from the Center on Philanthropy Panel Study (COPPS) a module of the Panel Study on Income Dynamics conducted at the University of Michigan. This modeling was intentional so as to provide comparable national averages on giving data. In addition, questions on the motivations for giving were modeled after questions asked on regional giving studies conducted by the Center on Philanthropy. Questions were vetted with the Research Methodology Committee, the Editorial Review Board, and Paul Schervish and John Havens of the Center on Wealth and Philanthropy at Boston College. Final questions were approved by Bank of America and Dr. Patrick Rooney at the Center on Philanthropy. There were two versions of the questionnaire: a 4-page version and an 8-page version. In addition, the survey was conducted with standard and anonymous versions of both questionnaires. The standard versions included survey ID numbers which were used for sample management and tracking. The anonymous versions did not include survey IDs, and respondents could not be linked to sample information. Pearson NCS designed the layout and printed the paper questionnaires. Final Disposition Summary The following table characterizes the disposition of sample cases. Label Regular Anonymous Totals Complete Partial Refusal Deceased Physically or mentally unable Nothing returned Mailing returned/undeliverable Not eligible Duplicate Totals
24 The response rate for this survey is 4.66%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR Response Rate 2, which includes partially completed questionnaires in the numerator. The denominator is the total sample, minus ineligibles. The response rate was 5.24% if you also exclude undeliverable surveys, those households that were not eligible, physically or mentally unable, or deceased. Final Dataset The study s main purpose is to understand the philanthropic patterns of high net-worth households. Therefore, any household with an income less than $200,000 or a net-worth of less than $1,000,000 was also excluded from analysis. In addition all respondents must make their primary residence in the United States. The total number of respondents to the survey was However, in order to produce a timely public report, we analyzed only the first 1150 responses. After excluding those households that did not qualify because of their income or wealth, the final sample was 945 responses for this report. All eligible responses will be utilized in all subsequent research emanating from this data. Analysis The Center on Philanthropy directed by Heidi Frederick and overseen by Dr. Patrick Rooney conducted four layers of analysis. The first layer consisted of running basic descriptive statistics on each variable. This analysis produced a series of tables on the mean, median, mode, percentage, maximum, and minimum on each variable as appropriate. The second layer of analysis was to conduct a series of crosstabulations. These crosstabulations were mostly conducted on donation data and other characteristics such as income, wealth, age, region, stage of life, etc. There were three demographic variables, race, age, and marriage, in which there was not enough variance in the sample to conduct analysis. The final layer of analysis was to conduct multivariate regression analysis using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Tobits, and Probits. Stata was used for the regression and other statistical analyses. The purpose of this analysis was to determine which variables and to what extent those variables were correlated with both the amount of giving and the propensity to give by high net-worth households, holding constant other factors statistically. Regression analyses allows us to determine the incremental or marginal effects of changes in any one independent variable like income on giving while holding constant statistically the other independent variables like wealth, age, and educational attainment. All multivariate analyses were overseen by the methodology committee. The final layer of analysis to be conducted is cluster analysis or factor analysis enabling researchers to identify various archetypes of donors found in the data. These results will also be overseen by the methodology committee. 24
The 2008 Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy
The 2008 Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy Issues Driving Charitable Activities among Affluent Households March 2009 Sponsored by Researched and Written by We especially thank the Indiana University
More informationThe 2010 Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy
The 2010 Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy Issues Driving Charitable Activities among Affluent Households November 2010 1 Sponsored by Researched and Written by We especially thank Indiana University
More informationThe 2008 Bank of America Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy Issues Driving Charitable Activities Among Affluent Households
The 2008 Bank of America Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy Issues Driving Charitable Activities Among Affluent Households April 20, 2010 Ramsay H. Slugg Senior Vice President National Wealth Strategies
More informationHow Changes in Tax Rates Might Affect Itemized Charitable Deductions. The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University March 2009
Executive Summary How Changes in Tax Rates Might Affect Itemized Charitable Deductions The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University March 2009 President Obama s budget proposal for 2010 and beyond
More informationWealth with Responsibility Study/2000
Wealth with Responsibility Study/2000 Introduction The 2000 Study on Wealth with Responsibility (WWR) was conducted solely for Deutsche Bank Private Banking by researchers at the Boston College Social
More informationHigh Net Worth Philanthropy
THE 2016 U.S. TRUST STUDY OF High Net Worth Philanthropy CHARITABLE PRACTICES AND PREFERENCES OF WEALTHY HOUSEHOLDS OCTOBER 2016 A collaboration between U.S. Trust and the Indiana University Lilly Family
More informationGiving, Volunteering & Participating
2007 CANADA SURVEY OF Giving, Volunteering & Participating Lindsey Vodarek David Lasby Brynn Clarke Giving and Volunteering in Québec Findings from the Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating
More informationHawai i Community Foundation
2015 SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS Hawai i continues to have high levels (93%) of household participation in giving cash, goods or time (volunteering). Volunteering is at the highest level seen in these giving studies
More informationHow to Talk to Clients About Philanthropy: What They Need and Expect. Kathryn W. Miree & Associates, Inc.
How to Talk to Clients About Philanthropy: What They Need and Expect Kathryn W. Miree & Associates, Inc. What We Know About Charitable Giving in the United States Source Amount in Billions Percentage of
More informationSession 2 Philanthropic Trends: Impact of High Net Worth, Gender, and Generational Trends on Giving and Volunteering
Session 2 Philanthropic Trends: Impact of High Net Worth, Gender, and Generational Trends on Giving and Volunteering Sisters of Charity of Nazareth Advancing Mission Session #2 Wednesday, October 28, 2015
More informationThe U.S. Trust Study of the Philanthropic Conversation
The U.S. Trust Study of the Philanthropic Conversation Understanding advisor approaches and client expectations Executive Summary Conducted in partnership with The Philanthropic Initiative Overview The
More informationThe 2018 U.S. Trust Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy 1
The 2018 U.S. Trust Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy 1 Conducted in partnership with the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy Executive Summary Insights into the motivations, priorities
More informationTHE U.S. TRUST STUDY OF THE PHILANTHROPIC CONVERSATION:
THE U.S. TRUST STUDY OF THE PHILANTHROPIC CONVERSATION: Understanding Advisor Approaches & Client Expectations Conducted in partnership with The Philanthropic Initiative JULY 2018 Table of contents I.
More informationFinances and Philanthropy: Today s Patterns and Tomorrow s Prospects
Finances and Philanthropy: Today s Patterns and Tomorrow s Prospects Paul G. Schervish Director (retired) Center on Wealth and Philanthropy Professor Emeritus, Sociology Boston College Crescendo Practical
More informationUnderstanding Advisor Approaches and Client Expectations
Understanding Advisor Approaches and Client Expectations Understanding Advisor Approaches and Client Expectations, written by Institutional Investments & Philanthropic Solutions from U.S. Trust, offers
More informationTop Ten Charitable Trends Every Advisor Should Know in 2017
Top Ten Charitable Trends Every Advisor Should Know in 2017 Bryan Clontz, CFP, CAP President, Charitable Solutions, LLC www.charitablesolutionsllc.com (404) 375-5496 Agenda 1. Philanthropy Is Alive and
More informationMERCATUS ON POLICY. The Charitable Contributions Deduction. Jeremy Horpedahl. January 2016
MERCATUS ON POLICY The Charitable Contributions Deduction Jeremy Horpedahl January 2016 Jeremy Horpedahl is an assistant professor of economics at the University of Central Arkansas, where he teaches principles
More informationBoomer, Gen X, Millennial Women: Do they give differently?
Boomer, Gen X, Millennial Women: Do they give differently? November 29, 2017 Abbie J von Schlegell, CFRE Principal a. von schlegell & co Who Are Boomers? Born 1946 to 1964 AKA: Woodstock Generation 78
More informationEnhance Your Life Through Philanthropy
Enhance Your Life Through Philanthropy Earning Your Trust Every Day Enhance Your Life Through Philanthropy Hearing the word philanthropist today brings to mind names like Bill Gates, Ted Turner or Michael
More informationQuality of Life in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being and Church Life: 2012 Nebraska Rural Poll Results: A Research Report
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications from the Center for Applied Rural Innovation (CARI) CARI: Center for Applied Rural Innovation 7-2012 Quality
More information2003 Survey of Planned Giving Vehicles
2003 Survey of Planned Giving Vehicles Released: June, 2003 Researched by: John J. Havens, Paul G. Schervish, and Mary A. O Herlihy Social Welfare Research Institute Boston College The authors thank Paul
More informationTop Ten Charitable Trends Every Advisor Should Know in 2018
Top Ten Charitable Trends Every Advisor Should Know in 2018 Bryan Clontz, Ph.D., CFP, CAP President, Charitable Solutions, LLC www.charitablesolutionsllc.com (404) 375-5496 Agenda 1. Philanthropy Is Alive
More informationThe 2007 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating: ATLANTIC CANADA
The 2007 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating: ATLANTIC CANADA DONATING: Donations Types of organizations supported Donor characteristics: - Age - Presence of children Donation methods
More informationTHE IMPACT OF INTERGENERATIONAL WEALTH ON RETIREMENT
Issue Brief THE IMPACT OF INTERGENERATIONAL WEALTH ON RETIREMENT When it comes to financial security during retirement, intergenerational transfers of wealth create a snowball effect for Americans age
More informationCOMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION Technical Report: February 2012 By Sarah Riley HongYu Ru Mark Lindblad Roberto Quercia Center for Community Capital
More informationThe Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the Territories
The Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the Regional Highlights of the National Survey of Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations Author: Sid Frankel Imagine Canada, 2006 Copyright
More informationCharitable Conversations...
Welcome The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area is a public charity that as of 2015 manages over $55 million in charitable assets spread across 475 different funds that have been established
More informationCOMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION Technical Report: February 2013 By Sarah Riley Qing Feng Mark Lindblad Roberto Quercia Center for Community Capital
More informationExtreme Engagement. And Other Trends that are Still Tracking Fall/Winter 2009
Extreme Engagement And Other Trends that are Still Tracking Fall/Winter 2009 Women and Philanthropy 2 Entrepreneurial Women* Millionaire Women Next Door, Thomas J. Stanley, 2006 Survey of women with $1
More informationUniversity Fund. Why I Give
University Fund MAKE A TANGIBLE IMPACT ON OUR STUDENTS. Funding from the commonwealth addresses less than 35% of the real cost associated with educating a student today, and tuition and fees alone do not
More informationThe 2004 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating: NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
The 2004 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating: NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR DONATING: Donations Types of organizations supported Donor characteristics: - Age - Education level Donation
More informationNational Influence. ...Local Connection. By Tanya Howe Johnson, CAE
National Influence By Tanya Howe Johnson, CAE When members of NCPG s Strategic Directions Task Force met in Indianapolis in August, they agreed that one important reason for NCPG s existence is to ensure
More informationThe Siller & Cohen Report
Randy P. Siller and Jeffrey S. Cohen The Siller & Cohen Report 1 st Quarter 2015 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Enhancing Your Legacy Through Philanthropy Siller & Cohen Family Wealth Advisors Enhancing Your Legacy
More informationGiving, Volunteering & Participating
2007 CANADA SURVY OF Giving, Volunteering & Participating David Lasby Giving and Volunteering for Social Services Organizations in Alberta Findings from the Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating
More informationIntroduction. 1. Bequests Charitable Gift Annuity Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Charitable Remainder Unitrus 6-7
Introduction. 1 Bequests..... 1-2 Charitable Gift Annuity.. 2-4 Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust... 5-6 Charitable Remainder Unitrus 6-7 Charitable Lead Trust.....7-8 Gifts of Retirement Plan Assets.
More informationPREPARING FOR PHILANTHROPY
PREPARING FOR PHILANTHROPY Hello and welcome. Northern Trust is proud to sponsor this podcast, Preparing for Philanthropy, the fourth in a series based on our book titled Legacy: Conversations about Wealth
More informationMortality of Beneficiaries of Charitable Gift Annuities 1 Donald F. Behan and Bryan K. Clontz
Mortality of Beneficiaries of Charitable Gift Annuities 1 Donald F. Behan and Bryan K. Clontz Abstract: This paper is an analysis of the mortality rates of beneficiaries of charitable gift annuities. Observed
More informationContact: Paul Schervish John Havens Director, SWRI Senior Research Associate 617-552-4070 617-552-4070 [MEDIA NOTE: To arrange an interview with the researchers contact the Boston College Social Welfare
More informationGiving, Volunteering & Participating
2004 CANADA SURVY OF Giving, Volunteering & Participating David Lasby Paul Bakker The Giving and Volunteering of Findings from the Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating givingandvolunteering.ca
More informationCOMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION Technical Report: March 2011 By Sarah Riley HongYu Ru Mark Lindblad Roberto Quercia Center for Community Capital
More informationTax Reform Bill Will Require Nonprofits to Refocus Their Donor Conversations on Tax-Efficient Planned Giving Strategies
Tax Reform Bill Will Require Nonprofits to Refocus Their Donor Conversations on Tax-Efficient Planned Giving Strategies By Amy Pieper Starting in 2018, nonprofit organizations will need to consider the
More informationGiving in the Netherlands 2013
Giving in the Netherlands 2013 Prof. Th.N.M. Schuyt, Ph.D., Gouwenberg, B.M. & Prof. R.H.F.P. Bekkers, Ph.D. (Eds., 2013). Giving in the Netherlands: Donations, Bequests, Sponsorship and Volunteering.
More informationCENTER FOR APPLIED RURAL INNOVATION
CENTER FOR APPLIED RURAL INNOVATION A Research Report* Access and Affordability: Rural Nebraskans View of Health Care 2004 Nebraska Rural Poll Results John C. Allen Rebecca Vogt Randolph L. Cantrell Center
More informationDonor Confidence Report Issue 9, February 2010
Donor Confidence Report Issue 9, ruary 2010 The results in this Donor Confidence Report are drawn from an ongoing survey of donor attitudes about giving by Campbell Rinker. The sample size for the ruary
More informationthe working day: Understanding Work Across the Life Course introduction issue brief 21 may 2009 issue brief 21 may 2009
issue brief 2 issue brief 2 the working day: Understanding Work Across the Life Course John Havens introduction For the past decade, significant attention has been paid to the aging of the U.S. population.
More informationCenter on Wealth and Philanthropy Individual Giving model: ForeCASt For 2009
Center on Wealth and Philanthropy Individual Giving model: ForeCASt For 2009 30 Advancing Philanthropy January/February 2010 BY JOHN J. HAVENS AND PAUL G. SCHERVISH For large diverse populations, such
More informationTax Reform and Charitable Giving
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Economics Department Faculty Publications Economics Department 28 Reform and Charitable Giving Seth H. Giertz University
More informationAnnual Joint Meeting. Blended Gifts. 10:45 11:45 a.m. & 12:30 1:30 p.m. Dr. Scott Janney, CFRE Chief Development Officer.
Annual Joint Meeting February 14, 2018 10:45 11:45 a.m. & 12:30 1:30 p.m. Dr. Scott Janney, CFRE Chief Development Officer What exactly is a blended gift? Planned Gift / Major Gift What exactly is a blended
More informationGiving in a Post-Tax Reform World Strategies to maximize the value of charitable gifts 1
Giving in a Post-Tax Reform World Strategies to maximize the value of charitable gifts 1 Martin Hall, Cameron Casey and Sarah Tomeo Hertzog Ropes & Gray LLP Following Congress recent enactment of the most
More information17 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Educational Attainment on Retirement Readiness
th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Educational Attainment on Retirement Readiness December 0 TCRS - Transamerica Institute, 0 Welcome to the th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey
More informationALL IN THE FAMILY: WEALTH, INEQUALITY AND CHARITABLE BEQUESTS IN VICTORIA
ALL IN THE FAMILY: WEALTH, INEQUALITY AND CHARITABLE BEQUESTS IN VICTORIA Christopher Baker Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne chbaker@swin.edu.au ABSTRACT Stratification of society and the
More informationCreating Philanthropy using Noncash Assets: Community Foundation Case Studies
Creating Philanthropy using Noncash Assets: Community Foundation Case Studies 1 Agenda Quick Intros Benefits to using Community Foundations Donor-Advised Funds Noncash Assets Statistics Case Studies 2
More informationWhite Paper. Charitable gift annuities come full circle with reinsurance. CGA basics
White Paper Charitable gift annuities come full circle with reinsurance John Trumbull, an American artist during the American Revolutionary War, is credited with the creation of the first modern charitable
More informationAppendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods
Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods I. Detailed Methodology Research Design AARP s 2003 multicultural project focuses on volunteerism and charitable giving. One broad goal of the project
More informationPhilanthropy as a Family Affair: Using a Private Foundation to Achieve Your Charitable Goals ~ Susan B. Hecker
Philanthropy as a Family Affair: Using a Private Foundation to Achieve Your Charitable Goals ~ Susan B. Hecker Establishing a private foundation can be a fulfilling way to work with charities, but be prepared
More informationNEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being Nebraska Rural Poll Results
NEBRASKA RURAL POLL A Research Report Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being 2015 Nebraska Rural Poll Results Rebecca Vogt Cheryl Burkhart-Kriesel Randolph Cantrell Bradley Lubben
More informationImpact Investing: At a Tipping Point?
Impact Investing: At a Tipping Point? This 2018 briefing provides data gathered from a survey of affluent and high-net-worth people who give to charity to understand their interest in, knowledge of and
More informationTRENDS IN DEFERRED GIVING AT SMALL PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES. Michael Thurlo Falder
TRENDS IN DEFERRED GIVING AT SMALL PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES Michael Thurlo Falder Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master
More informationInterview dates: October 23-30, 2006 Interviews: 900 black respondents, 706 registered voters, 361 likely voters (202)
1101 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Interview dates: October 23-30, 2006 Interviews: 900 black respondents, 706 registered voters, 361 likely voters (202) 463-7300 Margin of error:
More informationQuality of Life in Rural Nebraska: Trends and Changes
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications from the Center for Applied Rural Innovation (CARI) CARI: Center for Applied Rural Innovation August 2004 Quality
More informationA DONOR S GUIDE. https://rcf.reninc.com RCF A DONOR S GUIDE 1 RCF_DG_
A DONOR S GUIDE RCF A DONOR S GUIDE 1 Helping your philanthropy go further You know how gratifying it is to support a worthy cause. What if you could create an enduring legacy through your charitable contributions?
More informationThe Alford Group Summer Webinar Series
The Alford Group Summer Webinar Series July September 2016 Check back for announcements of additional webinars at www.alford.com Strengthening the not-for-profit community About The Alford Group Mission:
More information2016 Planned Giving Trends: Who s Giving Today Best Opportunities for Dollars Tomorrow
2016 Planned Giving Trends: Who s Giving Today Best Opportunities for Dollars Tomorrow Cheryl Sturm Director of Marketing, The Stelter Company Over 30 years of global communications and marketing experience
More informationTrends. o The take-up rate (the A T A. workers. Both the. of workers covered by percent. in Between cent to 56.5 percent.
April 2012 No o. 370 Employment-Based Health Benefits: Trends in Access and Coverage, 1997 20100 By Paul Fronstin, Ph.D., Employeee Benefit Research Institute A T A G L A N C E Since 2002 the percentage
More informationWealth Transfer Estimates: 2001 to 2055 St. Louis Metropolitan Area
Wealth Transfer Estimates: 2001 to 2055 St. Louis Metropolitan Area John J. Havens Paul G. Schervish Center on Wealth and Philanthropy Boston College September 17, 2004 The Center on Wealth and Philanthropy
More informationGiving USA 2015 The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2014
AllianceForNevadaNonprofits.org 1 Welcome to the 2015 Giving USA Alliance for Nevada Nonprofits Briefing Giving USA 2015 The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2014 Richard Tollefson, President
More informationLearn about charitable giving. Investor education
Learn about charitable giving Investor education Philanthropy is a fundamental part of human nature Regardless of whether your charitable giving is a result of your desire to improve the lives of others,
More informationMaking Your Charitable Gifts Last Turn year-end giving into a longer-term strategy
Making Your Charitable Gifts Last Turn year-end giving into a longer-term strategy b y c ar ol g. k r o c h National Director of Philanthropic Planning Wilmington Trust Company ke y p oin t s Even as you
More informationSarah E. Larson. School of Public and Environmental Affairs
Sarah E. Larson School of Public & Environmental Affairs, IUPUI Indianapolis, IN 46202 Phone: (317) 274-8227 Webpage: http://www.larsonse.com E-Mail: larsonse@iupui.edu Education Ph.D. Joint Degree in
More informationDaniel Wang, who will graduate from Baylor College of Medicine in 2019, with scholarship donor, Virginia Clark
CREATING legacies Making an impact on medicine SPRING/SUMMER 2017 Daniel Wang, who will graduate from Baylor College of Medicine in 2019, with scholarship donor, Virginia Clark Virginia Clark: Making an
More informationA DONOR S GUIDE. https://rcf.reninc.com RCF A DONOR S GUIDE 1 RCF_DG_
A DONOR S GUIDE RCF A DONOR S GUIDE 1 Helping your philanthropy go further You know how gratifying it is to support a worthy cause. What if you could create an enduring legacy through your charitable contributions?
More informationGenerosity in Canada: Trends in Personal Gifts and Charitable Donations Over Three Decades, 1969 to 1997: A Report Summary
Generosity in Canada: Trends in Personal Gifts and Charitable Donations Over Three Decades, 1969 to 1997: A Report Summary by Paul B. Reed Statistics Canada and Carleton University 1999 One in a series
More informationEstablishing a charitable trust structure
Establishing a charitable trust structure Kirrily Burgess: Philanthropy Services Manager, Perpetual Daniel Tome: Senior Financial Consultant, Perpetual Proudly supported by The Trust Company Important
More informationLatest Gifts in Wills Research
Latest Gifts in Wills Research What can we learn? SPEAKERS Dr Christopher Baker MFIA Asia-Pacific Centre for Social Investment & Philanthropy, Swinburne University of Technology Ross Anderson MFIA National
More informationUntapped Fundraising Potential: Demystifying Donor-Advised Funds
Untapped Fundraising Potential: Demystifying Donor-Advised Funds March 20, 2018 Presenters: Eva Nico, Senior Director of Programs, GuideStar Amy Pirozzolo, VP Marketing, Fidelity Charitable Today s Speakers
More informationSix Steps to an Effective Will
Six Steps to an Effective Will Unity Foundation of La Porte County Paying it Forward: Philanthropy Matters The Foundation of Estate Planning A will is a legal document designed to distribute your estate
More informationMaking a Bequest. Professor Jayanti Bandyopadhyay
Making a Bequest WITH YOUR ESTATE PLAN, YOU CAN NAME SALEM STATE AS THE BENEFICIARY OF A PORTION OF YOUR ESTATE, OR ASSETS WITHIN YOUR ESTATE. For many alumni and friends, this is the surest way to make
More informationWhat's new in planned giving motivations and demographics research
Professor Russell James III, J.D., Ph.D., CFP Texas Tech University What's new in planned giving motivations and demographics research New Results from the Lab and the Latest Demographics in Planned Giving
More informationNORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY
NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Data weighted to states Figure 1: Positive Feelings about Community: Summary i Frequency of Positive Feelings, by State OREGON
More informationCharitable Giving: Tax Benefits and Strategies
Charitable Giving: Tax Benefits and Strategies CPAs Attorneys Enrolled Agents Tax Professionals Professional Education Network TM Contents 1 Introduction 2 Overview of Tax Benefits 3 Tax Treatment of Gifts
More informationIssues AND. Tax-Powered Philanthropy: Doing well by doing good
Issues AND INSIGHTS February 2015 Tax-Powered Philanthropy: Doing well by doing good IN THIS ARTICLE Higher tax rates offer greater potential savings from charitable giving Strategies such as outright
More information2016 Retirement Confidence Survey
2016 Retirement Confidence Survey A Secondary Analysis of the Findings from Respondents Age 50+ Alicia R. Williams, PhD and Eowna Young Harrison, BS AARP Research https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00159.001
More informationWell-Being in Non-Metropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of the Present and Views of the Future
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications from the Center for Applied Rural Innovation (CARI) CARI: Center for Applied Rural Innovation 009 Well-Being
More informationNebraska State and Federal Tax Issues: Opinions of Rural Nebraskans
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications from the Center for Applied Rural Innovation (CARI) CARI: Center for Applied Rural Innovation July 2002 Nebraska
More informationThe UBS Donor-Advised Fund program guide
The UBS Donor-Advised Fund program guide Contents Creating a donor-advised fund...1 Assets accepted...2 Tax benefits...2 Contributions...2 Account valuation...3 Grantmaking...3 Administration...4 Investments...4
More informationPlanned Giving Made Simple
The webinar will begin at 12 p.m. Central Daylight Time Planned Giving Made Simple April 29, 2015 PRESENTED BY Lynn M. Gaumer, J.D. Senior Technical Consultant The Stelter Company Philip Purcell, J.D.
More informationMechanisms of Action. Three strategies to connect with your donors and inspire big gifts.
Mechanisms of Action Three strategies to connect with your donors and inspire big gifts. Presenter Eric B. Javier, Principal & Managing Director, CCS Fundraising June 13, 2018 1 Agenda 1. Current Trends
More informationThe Impact of Gender on Fundraising Salaries
The Impact of Gender on Fundraising Salaries 2014-2018 2019 Prepared by: with Executive Summary Nationwide, across a variety of professions, research suggests a narrowing, but persistent gap in pay between
More informationU.S. Trust Survey Finds Positive Trends in the Prevalence and Quality of Philanthropic Conversations Between Advisors and Clients
U.S. Trust Survey Finds Positive Trends in the Prevalence and Quality of Philanthropic Conversations Between Advisors and Clients Advisors Are Second Only to a Spouse or Partner as a Source for Philanthropic
More informationREFORMING CHARITABLE TAX INCENTIVES: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AND POLICY OPTIONS
REFORMING CHARITABLE TAX INCENTIVES: ASSESSING EVIDENCE AND POLICY OPTIONS Joseph Rosenberg and Eugene Steuerle November 15, 2018 The federal tax treatment of charitable giving and the nonprofit sector
More informationCanada QUICK FACTS. Five main social issues addressed by these organizations: Higher Education, Arts and Culture, Religion, Human Rights, Health
Canada Expert: Arthur B.C.Drache Institutional Affiliation: Drache Aptowitzer LLP Reviewer: Kathi Badertscher. IUPUI Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. With contributions from staff at the Indiana University
More informationMedicaid and PeachCare for Kids Member Survey: Customer Service Satisfaction. Fall Prepared for ACS. By the Georgia Health Policy Center
Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids Member Survey: Customer Service Satisfaction Prepared for ACS By the Georgia Health Policy Center CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 BACKGROUND... 5 METHODOLOGY... 7 Sample...
More informationStatement on Tax Reform
Statement on Tax Reform Submitted to the Senate Finance Committee United States Senate July 2017 National Association of Charitable Gift Planners 200 S. Meridian Street, Suite 510 Indianapolis, Indiana
More informationJulio Videras Department of Economics Hamilton College
LUCK AND GIVING Julio Videras Department of Economics Hamilton College Abstract: This paper finds that individuals who consider themselves lucky in finances donate more than individuals who do not consider
More informationEIBIS 2016 Ireland. Country Overview
EIBIS 2016 2014 EIB Group Survey on Investment and Investment Finance 2016 Country Overview Finance Country Overview: European Investment Bank (EIB), 2016. All rights reserved. About the EIB Investment
More informationPhilanthropic Services at Bernstein Helping philanthropic families and not-for-profit organizations reach their goals
Philanthropic Services at Bernstein Helping philanthropic families and not-for-profit organizations reach their goals Just as ripples spread out when a single pebble is dropped in water, the actions of
More informationThe new state of donation: Three decades of household giving to charity
The new state of donation: Three decades of household giving to charity 1978 2008 Executive Summary Edd Cowley, CMPO, University of Bristol Tom McKenzie, CGAP, Cass Business School Cathy Pharoah,CGAP,
More informationBoomers at Midlife. The AARP Life Stage Study. Wave 2
Boomers at Midlife 2003 The AARP Life Stage Study Wave 2 Boomers at Midlife: The AARP Life Stage Study Wave 2, 2003 Carol Keegan, Ph.D. Project Manager, Knowledge Management, AARP 202-434-6286 Sonya Gross
More informationNon-Profit Executives Perceptions of the Vermont Non-Profit Sector. Prepared by Michael Moser The Center for Rural Studies University of Vermont
Non-Profit Executives Perceptions of the Vermont Non-Profit Sector Prepared by Michael Moser The Center for Rural Studies University of Vermont Table of Contents Methodology:... 1 Overall, do you feel
More informationMarch 5, CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice ) Room 5203 P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC RE: Comments Regarding Notice
March 5, 2018 Internal Revenue Service CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2017-73) Room 5203 P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Via Email: Notice.Comments@irscounsel.treas.gov RE: Comments Regarding
More information