RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING
|
|
- Bennett Harmon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before the Quebec District Council («the District Council») of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada («the Association»), on January 22, 2003 at 1, Place Ville-Marie, Suite 2802, Montreal (Quebec), at 10:00 a.m., or so soon thereafter as the hearing can be held, concerning a disciplinary action brought by the Association Staff concerning Warren J. McCaffrey («the Respondent»). NOTICE is further given that the staff of the Association allege the following violations of the By-laws, Regulations or Policies of the Association by the Respondent being at all relevant time a Registered Representative employed with Leduc & Associés Valeurs mobilières ( Leduc ) : N o 1 On or around October 31, 2000, the Respondent falsified a letter on which he forged the signature of his client, S.W., in order to transfer an amount of $1, from the client s account to the account of another client, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law N o 2 In November 2000, the Respondent attempted to fraudulently misappropriate an amount of $13,000 by depositing in his own personal bank account a cheque received from a client, B.F., for her account at the Member firm, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law N o 3 On or around November 6, 2000, the Respondent fraudulently misappropriated an amount of $24, by depositing in his own personal bank account a cheque issued by the Member firm in the name of his client, N.H., thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law 29.1.
2 2 N o 4 On or around December 7, 2000, the Respondent falsified a Request to the Member firm, on which he forged the signature of his client, H.G., for the issuance of a cheque of $25,000 payable to a third party from the client s account, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law N o 5 On December 2000, the Respondent fraudulently converted an amount of $145,000 by depositing in his spouse s account a bank draft he had received from his client, N.H., for the purchase of securities in her account at the Member firm, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law N o 6 During the period from January 2001 to May 2001, the Respondent misled his client, N.H., by bringing her to believe that he had followed her instruction to execute a purchase for which she had given him an amount of $145,000, by depositing every month in her account an amount representing the revenue she would have received on the securities she was erroneously believing to own, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law N o 7 On or around January 30, 2001, the Respondent provided the Member firm with a letter he had falsified and on which he forged the signature of his client, P.S., in order to request the issuance from the client s account of a cheque payable to another client, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law N o 8 On or around May 2, 2001, the Respondent provided the Member firm with a letter he had falsified and on which he forged the signature of his client, P.S., in order to request the issuance from the client s account of a cheque payable to another client, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law 29.1 N o 9 On or around February 6, 2001, the Respondent fraudulently converted an amount of $29, by depositing in his spouse s account a cheque payable to the Member firm for the credit of [A.F.], his client, that he received in the course of the client s transfer of her RRSP from another financial institution, thereby engaging in business conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to By-law 29.1.
3 3 PARTICULARS NOTICE is further given that the following is a summary of the facts alleged and intended to be relied upon by the Association at the said hearing: 1. The Association initiated an investigation into the conduct of the Respondent following allegations of conduct unbecoming contained in the Uniform Termination Notice of the Respondent filed on May 25, 2001 by Leduc & Associés Valeurs mobilières inc. ( Leduc ), a Member of the Association. i) The Respondent 2. At all relevant time, the Respondent was a Registered Representative employed with Leduc at its sub-branch in Hudson in the Province of Quebec. 3. The Respondent has been a registered in the industry as Registered Representative since January of 1998 and has been employed with Leduc from November 1998 to May The Respondent is not registered with a Member of the Association since his dismissal on May 18, ii) Fraudulent activities ACCOUNT OF S.W. ACCOUNT OF S.T. Conversion of funds 5. At all relevant time, S.W. and S.T. were both clients of the Respondent at Leduc. 6. On or around October 31, 2000, the Respondent fraudulently falsified a request for transfer, on which he forged the signature of his client, S.W., in order to transfer from the client s account (No.4NHBBIA) an amount of $1, into the account (No. 4NHBA9E) of another client, S.T. 7. The clients S.W. and S.T. were in no way related to each other and the transfer was made without their knowledge and consent.
4 4 ACCOUNT OF B.F. Misappropriation 8. At all relevant time, B. F. was a client of the Respondent at Leduc. 9. During the month of November 2000, B. F. gave to the Respondent a cheque in the amount of $13,000, payable to Leduc, for deposit in her account at Leduc. 10. The Respondent misappropriated the cheque of $13,000 by depositing it in his own personal bank account. 11. According to the Respondent, the Bank returned the cheque for the reason that it was not drafted in the name of the Respondent. ACCOUNT OF N.H. Misappropriation 12. At all relevant time, N.H. was a client of the Respondent at Leduc. 13. On or around November 6, 2000, all the positions in the account No. 4NHAW69 of the client, N.H., were sold. The Respondent would have explained that the client wanted to liquidate her account because she was leaving on vacation. 14. The Respondent asked for the issuance of a cheque in the name of the client, N.H. and on or around November 6, 2000, a cheque of de $24 205,37 was sent by Leduc to the Respondent s sub-branch to be picked-up by the client. 15. On or around November 16, 2000, the Respondent misappropriated the cheque payable to N.H. by depositing it in his own personal bank account. 16. When the client requested her cheque, the Respondent would have then borrowed $25,000 from a third party, R.O., to cover the amount fraudulently misappropriated from N.H. ACCOUNT OF H.G. Conversion of funds 17. At all relevant time, H.G. was a client of the Respondent at Leduc. 18. On or around December 7, 2000, the Respondent falsified a request addressed to the Member on which he fraudulently forged the signature of his client, H.G., asking for the issuance of a cheque of $25,000 from the client s account no. 4NHO39A, payable to a third party, R.O., the same one from whom the Respondent had borrowed $25,000, as detailed in paragraph 16.
5 5 19. On or around December 7, 2000, the cheque of $25,000 was issued by Leduc from the account of H.G., payable to R.O. according to the written request. 20. The third party, R.O., and the client, H.G., were in no way related to each other and the withdrawal in the account of H.G. was made without her knowledge and consent. ACCOUNT OF M.R. Misappropriation 21. At all relevant time, M.R. was a client of the Respondent at Leduc. 22. On December 2000, the Respondent received from his client, M.R., a bank draft in the amount of $145,000, payable to Leduc, to invest in «Triax Carts», an investment generating interests payable on a monthly basis. 23. On or around December 20, 2000, the Respondent fraudulently misappropriated the bank draft of $145,000 by depositing it in the account of the Respondent s wife at Leduc, instead of depositing it in the client s account. 24. The Respondent did not purchase the Triax Carts» in M.R. account. 25. In order to avoid the discovery of the fact that her investment had not been purchased, the Respondent deposited in her bank account on a monthly basis starting on January 2001, an amount of $1,000 representing the interests that her investment would have generated in her account. ACCOUNT OF P.S. Conversion of funds 26. At all relevant time, P. S. was a client of the Respondent at Leduc. 27. In order to obtain the monthly payments of $1,000 that he was depositing in the account of M.R., as detailed in paragraph 25, the Respondent fraudulently arranged for having cheques for same amounts issued on the name of the client, M.R., from the account of another client, P.S., without his knowledge. 28. More specifically, on or around January 30, 2001, the Respondent falsified a letter by which P.S. was giving instruction to Leduc to issue from his account no. 4NHBAOA a cheque payable to M.R. in the amount of $1,000, on which letter the Respondent had fraudulently imitated the signature of M.R.
6 6 29. On or around May 2, 2001, to make another deposit in the account of M.R., the Respondent falsified another written request of P.S. asking for the issuance of a cheque of $1,000 payable to M.R., on which he imitated the signature of P.S. once again. 30. The clients M.R. and P.S. were not related to each other in any way and the movements of funds in their respective accounts were made without their knowledge and consent. ACCOUNT OF A.F. Misappropriation 31. At all relevant time, A.F. was a client of the Respondent at Leduc. 32. While transferring the RRSP of a client, A.F., the Respondent directly sent the T2033 form to the Sun Life of Canada Insurance Company, without going through the intermediary of his firm, and successfully obtained that the cheque be made payable to «Warren McCaffrey Leduc & Associates for the credit of [A.F.]». 33. In early February of 2001, the Respondent directly received the cheque in the amount of $29 583,56 for the account of A.F. 34. On or around February 2001, the Respondent fraudulently deposited the cheque of $ ,56 in his wife s account no. 4NHE68E at Leduc, instead of depositing it in the client s account. 35. On or around Fevruary 6, 2001, an amount totalling $ was transferred from the account of the Respondent s wife at Leduc to the Respondent s own account at Leduc.
7 7 NOTICE is further given that the Respondent shall be entitled to appear and be heard and be accompanied by counsel or agent at the hearing and to call, examine and cross-examine witnesses. NOTICE is further given that the Association By-laws provide that if, in the opinion of the District Council, the Respondent has failed to comply with or carry our the provisions of any federal or provincial statute relating to trading or advising in respect of securities or commodities or of any regulation or policy made pursuant thereto; failed to comply with the provisions of any of the By-laws, Regulations, Rulings or Policies of the Association; engaged in any business conduct or practice which such District Council in its discretion considers unbecoming or not in the public interest; or is otherwise not qualified whether by integrity, solvency, training or experience, the District Council has the power to impose any one or more of the following penalties : 1) a reprimand; 2) a fine not exceeding the greater of : 1) $1,000,000. per offence; and 2) an amount equal to three times the pecuniary benefit which accrued to such person as a result of committing the violation; 3) suspension of approval of the person for such specified period and upon such terms as the District Council may determine; 4) revocation of approval of such person; 5) prohibition of approval of the person in any capacity for any period of time; 6) such conditions of approval or continued approval as may be considered appropriate by the District Council. NOTICE is further given that the District Council may, in its discretion, require that the Respondent pay the whole or part of the costs of the proceedings before the District council and any investigation relating thereto. NOTICE is further given that the District Council may accept as having been proven any facts alleged or conclusions drawn by the Association in the Notice of Hearing and Particulars that are not specifically denied, with a summary of the facts alleged and conclusions drawn based on those alleged facts, in a REPLY.
8 8 NOTICE is further given that the Respondent has ten (10) days from the date on which this Notice of Hearing and Particulars was served, to serve a REPLY upon: Investment Dealers Association of Canada 1, Place Ville-Marie Suite 2802 Montréal, Québec H3B 4R4 Attention : Sylvie Poirier, Enforcement Counsel A REPLY may either: i) specifically deny (with a summary of the facts alleged and intended to be relied upon by the Respondent, and the conclusions drawn by the Respondent based on all the alleged facts) any or all of the facts alleged or the conclusions drawn by the Association in the Notice of Hearing and Particulars; or ii) admit the facts alleged and conclusions drawn by the Association in the notice of Hearing and Particulars and plead circumstances in mitigation of any penalty to be assessed. NOTICE is further given that, if the Respondent fails to serve a Reply or attend at the hearing, notwithstanding that a Reply may have been served, the District Council may proceed with the hearing of the matter on the date and at the time and place set out in this Notice, or on any subsequent date, at any time and place, without further notice to and in the absence of the Respondent, and the District Council may accept the facts alleged or the conclusions drawn by the association in this Notice of Particulars as having been proven, and may impose any of the penalties prescribed by the By-laws of the Association. DATED at Montreal, Province of Quebec, this day of CARMEN CRÉPIN Vice-President, Quebec INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA 1, Place Ville-Marie, Suite 2802 Montreal, Quebec H3B 4R4
RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that
More information(1) Misappropriated funds in the amount of $150,000 from the account of the N.B.O.
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: JAMES DONALD BRUCE NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before
More informationRE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationRE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: HUGH DAMIAN BAGNELL NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationRE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND RICHARD POIRIER NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201425 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Bemelekot Woldeyes Tewahade
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201414 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Patrick Cronin NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationRE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING I. BACKGROUND IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: EDWARD PAUY KIM ING NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201412 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Paolo Abate NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA In the matter of: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Shaun Wayne Howell.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201609 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Jack L. Comeau NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS Contested Discipline Hearing held February 1 and 2, 2005 Hearing
More informationDecision on Settlement Agreement
Unofficial English Translation Re Béland In the matter of: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Alain
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ROLAND PAPP NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA ANDRÉ BERGERON NOTICE OF HEARING
This non official translation of the official French version of the originating document is provided solely for public information and should not be relied upon for any legal purposes. INVESTMENT DEALERS
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND WASSEEM DIRANI NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY
IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY Heard: May 1, 2006 Decision: May 10, 2006 Hearing Panel: Eric Spink, Chair Kathleen Jost William
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND HARALAMBOS PANDELIDIS NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ANDY HYON CHUL KIM NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND GENNARO SCERBO STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS Further to a Notice of Hearing dated September 13, 2017, staff of the
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND EARL MAREK NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND JEAN-LOUIS TRUDEAU NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING. Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY
More informationRE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE
BULLETIN 3216 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationMUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: SHAWN SANDINK DISCIPLINARY HEARING. Hearing: June 22, 2006 Decision: July 19, DECISION and REASONS
Decision and Reasons File No. 200602 MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 and 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE HENRY COLE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HENRY COLE NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JULIAN ROBERT RICCI NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND Rajiv Puri NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationThe Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA In the matter of: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Paul Christopher Darrigo NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationDiscipline Penalties Imposed on Michael Joseph Puccini; Violations of By-laws 29.1 and 19.5
Contact: For distribution to relevant parties within your firm Diana Iannetta Enforcement Counsel BULLETIN #3619 416-943-5781 April 18, 2007 diannetta@ida.ca Discipline Discipline Penalties Imposed on
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DAVID EDWARD SLOAN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Samuel Kloda.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND SAMUEL KLODA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More information11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017
ISSUED IIROC Nation^Weafing Coordinator 11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization ot Canada Organisme canadien de reglementalion du commerce des v.ileurs mobilieres IN THE MATTER
More informationRe Toh. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Toh IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Weng Lok
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationRe Nieswandt REASONS FOR DECISION
Re Nieswandt IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Rodney Joseph Nieswandt 2018 IIROC 41 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Hearing
More informationRe Industrial Alliance Securities
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Industrial Alliance Securities The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. 2014 IIROC 57 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationRe Savard. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada
Unofficial English Translation Re Savard IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Michel
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND WILLIAM RICHARD BOOTH BELL WRIGHT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Enforcement
More informationORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF MARK STEVEN ROTSTEIN AND EQUILIBRIUM PARTNERS INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER
More informationAMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND EDWARD PETER BODNARCHUK AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE
More informationTAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND TERRY NORMAN DYCK NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More information5. Staff and the Respondent jointly recommend that the District Council accept this Settlement Agreement.
BULLETIN NO. IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: JORY CAPITAL INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment
More informationRe National Bank Direct Brokerage Inc. Decision
Unofficial English Translation Re National Bank Direct Brokerage Inc. In the matter of: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers
More informationRe Gebert REASONS AND DECISION
Re Gebert IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Jeffrey Edward Gebert 2016 IIROC 44 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationRe Elue. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) 2014 IIROC 39
Re Elue IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) and Afam Elue 2014 IIROC 39 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND KEVIN FREDERICK PRICE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment Dealers
More informationRe Assante Capital Management REASONS FOR DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Assante Capital Management The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Assante Capital Management Ltd. 2015 IIROC 44 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND BENJAMIN HUW DAVIES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationRe Lewis. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) 2016 IIROC 01
Re Lewis IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Robert Lewis 2016 IIROC 01 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationFor distribution to relevant parties within your firm. Diane Bouchard Enforcement Counsel BULLETIN N June 20, 2007
Contact: For distribution to relevant parties within your firm Diane Bouchard Enforcement Counsel BULLETIN N 3638 514 878-2854 June 20, 2007 dbouchard@ida.ca Discipline Permanent Bar from Approval with
More informationAGREEMENT ON JOINT DISCIPLINE
AGREEMENT ON JOINT DISCIPLINE This Agreement on Joint Discipline ( Agreement ), dated as of, is entered into by and among the undersigned organizations (individually a Party and collectively the Parties
More informationPART I - PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS
POLICY NO. 6 PART I - PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS Introduction This Part I outlines the proficiency requirements for registered persons. These proficiency requirements consist of both entrance thresholds
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED (the Act ) - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND KENNETH RICHARD MILLER NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND JOHN SHANE MACEACHERN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I.
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JEAN-LOUIS TRUDEAU NOTICE OF HEARING An initial appearance ("Initial Appearance") will be held before a hearing
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: RESEARCH CAPITAL CORPORATION AND PATRICK GERALD WALSH District Council: The Honourable Robert S.
More informationRe Trudeau UNANIMOUS DECISION ON THE MERITS
Unofficial English Translation Re Trudeau IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Jean-Louis Trudeau 2017 IIROC 51 Hearing Panel of the Investment
More informationTHE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 1956 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 1956 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF: TO: AND TO: A charge against OLIVER CONRAD NOE, CA, a member of the Institute,
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND - IN THE MATTER OF ZHEN (STEVEN) PANG and OASIS WORLD TRADING INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationRe Klemke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Klemke IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Paul Ryan
More informationJEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into Cole s conduct.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HENRY COLE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationDisciplinary Procedure for School Based Staff. PERS 52 Unclassified
Disciplinary Procedure for School Based Staff PERS 52 Unclassified 1. INTRODUCTION (a) This procedure applies to those employees of the Council who form the staffing complement of Hargate Primary School.
More informationRe Jones. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Jones The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Michael
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DUNCAN ROY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ZYGMUNT JANIEWICZ NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA
THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF JACOBUS DAMEN, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT
More informationRe Kloda DECISION ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Re Kloda IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Samuel Kloda 2016 IIROC 50 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Hearing Panel (Quebec
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT
More informationLife Insurance Council Bylaws
Life Insurance Council Bylaws Effective January 1, 2007 Amended 05/2008 Bylaw 10, Section 2; Schedule A, Part II, Section 4 Amended 05/2009 Bylaw 5, Section 1, Section 5; Bylaw 7, Section 5 Amended 10/2009
More informationALL SPORT LEGAL DEFENSE EXPENSES COVERAGE FORM
ALL SPORT LEGAL DEFENSE EXPENSES COVERAGE FORM Throughout this Coverage Form the words "you" and "your" refer to the Named Insured shown in the Declarations. The words "we", "us" and "our"' refer to the
More informationAn Investor s Guide to Making a Complaint
www.iiroc.ca Tel. 1.877.442.4322 An Investor s Guide to Making a Complaint Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Organisme canadien de réglementation du commerce des valeurs mobilières
More information2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the Respondents conduct.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND BARRET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC., JAMIE COHEN
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More informationRe Pan. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Pan IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Sammy Shieh
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, C. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen oust Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, RSO 1990, c S.5 - AND -
Ontario Commission des 22nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION RULE NON-RESIDENT ADVISERS
This document is an unofficial consolidation of all amendments to Ontario Securities Commission Rule 35-502 Non-Resident Advisers, applying from September 28, 2009. This document is for reference purposes
More information260 Act LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA. No AN ACT
260 Act 1983-72 LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA HB 379 No. 1983-72 AN ACT Providing for the licensing and regulating of public adjusters andpu-blic~adjuster solicitors. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of
More informationRe Silvaggio 2011 IIROC 63. Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Hearing Panel (Québec District Council)
Unofficial English Translation Re Silvaggio IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More informationMUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA/ ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES COURTIERS DE FONDS MUTUELS RULES
April 12, 2018 MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA/ ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES COURTIERS DE FONDS MUTUELS RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 RULE NO. 1 BUSINESS STRUCTURES AND QUALIFICATIONS... 1 1.1 BUSINESS
More informationREAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION
REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO John Van Dyk Respondent This document also
More information