SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
|
|
- Thomas Newman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 0 HOJOON HWANG (SBN 0) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 0 Mission Street Twenty-Seventh Floor San, Francisco, CA 0-0 Telephone: () -000 HENRY WEISSMANN (SBN ) Henry.Weissmann@mto.com ZACHARY BRIERS (SBN ) Zachary.Briers@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP South Grand Avenue Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: () -00 Attorneys for Defendant VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 0 DEANNA GASTELUM and HEATHER BRYDEN, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC. and DOES through 00, Defendants. VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., vs. Cross-Complainant, DEANNA GASTELUM and HEATHER BRYDEN, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Cross-Defendant. CASE NO. CGC-- CLASS ACTION SECOND AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Third Complaint Filed: March, 0 Dept. 0 Judge: Hon. Curtis Karnow AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
2 0 0 Cross-Complainant Verizon California, Inc. ( Verizon ), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby cross-complains against cross-defendant Deanna Gastelum and Heather Bryden ( Cross-Defendants ). This second amended cross-complaint is amended to conform to changes in Cross-Defendants Third Amended Complaint. Verizon makes the following allegations based upon information and belief. NATURE OF THE ACTION. Cross-Defendants allege that they entered into an agreement with Verizon for the provision of residential landline telephone service ( the Agreement ). To the extent this is true, Cross-Defendants agreed to pay Verizon for provision of such services on a monthly basis. Cross-Defendants further agreed that if they chose to not pay their bills according to the monthly schedule established by Verizon, they would pay an additional fee of $.0 or.% for outstanding balances of more than $0.00 ( the Late Payment Charge or the LPC ).. Cross-Defendants allege that they paid one or multiple LPCs. To the extent Cross- Defendants did pay an LPC, they did so as a result of the exercise of an option to make payment after the time for payment was due.. Cross-Defendants have filed suit against Verizon, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of California consumers, in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Francisco, alleging Verizon violated Cal. Civ. Code (d): Cal. Civ. Code 0, et seq.; Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code 00, et seq.; and Cal. Pub. Util. Code 0. They also assert claims for unjust enrichment/common law restitution and a common count for money had and received. Cross-Defendants claims are based on the LPCs they allege that they paid to Verizon.. According to Cross-Defendants, the Verizon LPC provision is unenforceable because it is a liquidated damages provision that violates California Law. Cross-Defendants seek, among other things, to have the Court declare that the Verizon LPC is void and to order Verizon to return any LPCs it collected from Cross-Defendants.. Contemporaneous with this cross-complaint, Verizon is filing an Answer in which Verizon denies that the LPC is an unlawful liquidated damages provision. Verizon thus contends that the LPC is valid and enforceable. -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
3 0 0. In the event, and only in the event, that the Court disagrees with Verizon and determines that: (i) Cross-Defendants in fact breached the Agreement by making late payment; and (ii) that the LPC clause is a liquidated damages provision that violates California law, then Verizon brings this Cross-Complaint against Cross-Defendants to recover the actual damages sustained by Verizon as a result of Cross-Defendants breach of the Agreement.. Cross-Defendants seeks to certify their claims as a class action. At the present time, Cross-Defendants claims have not been certified for class resolution. However, in the event, and only in the event, that the Court certifies Cross-Defendants claims for class resolution, then Verizon brings this Cross-Complaint against the class to recover the actual damages sustained by Verizon as a result of the class s breach of the Agreement. PARTIES. Cross-Complainant Verizon California Inc., is a California corporation with its primary place of business in Newbury Park, CA. Verizon is in the business of providing residential and business landline telephone service to individuals, families and businesses in California.. On information and belief, Cross-Defendants Deanna Gastelum and J. Thomas Hannan are residents of the State of California. OPERATIVE FACTS 0. Verizon and Cross-Defendants entered in a Customer Agreement. Pursuant to the Customer Agreement, Verizon agreed to provide residential landline services to Cross- Defendants in exchange for monthly payments to be made by Cross-Defendants. Under the Customer Agreement, Cross-Defendants agreed to make monthly payments to Verizon in accordance with a monthly billing schedule set by Verizon.. On information and belief, on at least one occasion, Cross-Defendants did not submit timely payment in accordance with the Agreement.. To the extent Cross-Defendants paid an LPC to Verizon, they did so as a result of their submitting late payment in accordance with the Agreement. -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
4 0 0. It is the position of Verizon that any LPC payment remitted by Cross-Defendants was collected in accordance with California law. However, in the event the Court determines that the LPC provision in the Agreement to which Cross-Defendants claim to be parties is void and unenforceable, and that Cross-Defendants breached the Agreement by submitting late payment, then Cross-Defendants owe Verizon compensation for the damages caused by their breach of the Agreement.. As of the date of the filing of this Cross-Complaint, Cross-Defendants claims have not been certified as a class action. In the event, and only in the event, the Court certifies Cross-Defendants claims for class resolution, Verizon asserts the claims set forth herein against the members of the plaintiff class on an individual and a class-wide basis. FIRST ALTERNATIVE CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Contract). Verizon realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs through of this Cross-Complaint as if fully set forth herein.. The Customer Agreement Cross-Defendants executed with Verizon was binding and enforceable.. In the event the Court determines that the LPC provision set forth in the Cross- Defendants Customer Agreement is an invalid liquidated damages clause, and that the Customer Agreement did not allow Cross-Defendants to pay the LPC as an alternative means of performance, then Cross-Defendants damaged Verizon by not making timely payment. Damages incurred by Verizon include, but are not limited to, the carrying cost of Cross-Defendants outstanding balance; and all costs associated with collection efforts to obtain the agreed-upon payment from Cross-Defendants.. Verizon performed all of its duties and obligations under Cross-Defendants Customer Agreement.. Verizon seeks its damages, including prejudgment interest and consequential damages. -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
5 0 0 SECOND ALTERNATIVE CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Contract Against the Putative Class) 0. Verizon realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs through of this Cross-Complaint as if fully set forth herein.. As of the date of the filing of this Cross-Complaint, Cross-Defendants claims have not been certified as a class action. In the event, and only in the event, the Court certifies Cross-Defendants claims for class resolution, Verizon asserts this second alternative cause of action against the members of the plaintiff class on an individual and a class-wide basis.. The Customer Agreement the class members executed with Verizon was binding and enforceable.. In the event the Court determines that the LPC provision set forth in the Customer Agreement is an invalid liquidated damages clause, and that the Customer Agreement did not allow class members to pay the LPC as an alternative means of performance, then the class members damaged Verizon by not making timely payment. Damages incurred by Verizon include, but are not limited to, the carrying cost of the class members outstanding balances; and all costs associated with collection efforts to obtain the agreed-upon payment from the class members.. Verizon performed all of its duties and obligations to class members under the Customer Agreement.. Verizon seeks its damages, including prejudgment interest and consequential damages. THIRD ALTERNATIVE CAUSE OF ACTION (Unjust Enrichment). Verizon realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs through of this Cross-Complaint as if fully set forth herein. -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
6 0 0. It is the position of Verizon that the Customer Agreement to which Cross- Defendants assert they were parties is valid and enforceable. In the event the Court finds that any portion of Cross-Defendants Customer Agreement was void, then Cross-Defendants are liable to Verizon for the benefits they received under the contract.. Cross-Defendants received certain benefits as consideration for which Cross- Defendants agreed to remit timely payment in accordance with the schedule established by the Customer Agreement.. Cross-Defendants failed to remit timely payment in accordance with the schedule established by the Customer Agreement. 0. If Cross-Defendants are relieved of the obligation to pay the LPC, they should not in justice be permitted to retain the benefits they received from Verizon.. Accordingly, if Cross-Defendants are relieved of the obligation to pay the LPC, they will be unjustly enriched and the amount of the benefits they received should be restored to Verizon as restitution. FOURTH ALTERNATIVE CAUSE OF ACTION (Unjust Enrichment Against the Putative Class). Verizon realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs through of this Cross-Complaint as if fully set forth herein.. As of the date of the filing of this Cross-Complaint, Cross-Defendants claims have not been certified as a class action. In the event, and only in the event, the Court certifies Cross-Defendants claims for class resolution, Verizon asserts this fourth alternative cause of action against the members of the plaintiff class on an individual and a class-wide basis.. It is the position of Verizon that the Customer Agreement to which the putative class asserts it was a party was valid and enforceable. In the event the Court finds that any portion of the Customer Agreement was void, then the putative class is liable to Verizon for the benefits it received under the contract. -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
7 0 0. The putative class received certain benefits as consideration for which the class agreed to remit timely payment in accordance with the schedule established by the Customer Agreement.. The putative class failed to remit timely payment in accordance with the schedule established by the Customer Agreement.. If the putative class is relieved of the obligation to pay the LPC, it should not in justice be permitted to retain the benefits it received from Verizon.. Accordingly, if the putative class is relieved of the obligation to pay the LPC, it will be unjustly enriched and the amount of the benefits it received should be restored to Verizon as restitution. PRAYER WHEREFORE, Cross-Complainant prays for judgment as follows:. For an award of damages against Cross-Defendants, including incidental and consequential damages, in a specific amount to be proven at trial;. For an award of interest on the above;. If Cross-Defendants claims are certified for class resolution, for an award of damages against the class, including incidental and consequential damages, in a specific amount to be proven at trial;. For an award of interest on the above;. For an award of Cross-Complainant s attorneys fees and costs incurred herein;. If the Cross-Complainant s Customer Agreements are held void, for an award of restitution of benefits conferred by Verizon; and. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper. -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
8 0 0 DATED: April, 0 Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP HOJOON HWANG By: /s/ Hojoon Hwang HOJOON HWANG Attorneys for Defendant VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC. AND DOES THROUGH 00, -- AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASE NO. CGC--
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
1 Laura L. Ho (SBN ) lho@gbdhlegal.com James P. Kan (SBN 0) jkan@gbdhlegal.com Byron Goldstein (SBN 0) brgoldstein@gbdhlegal.com GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 00 Lakeside Drive, Suite 00 Oakland, CA
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X LIVE NATION MARKETING, INC., LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE, INC., and WESTCHESTER
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff Impulse Marketing Group, Inc., by its attorneys, Klein, Zelman, Rothermel &
Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. v. National Small Business Alliance, Inc. et al Doc. 1 Case 105-cv-07776-KMK Document 1 Filed 09/02/2005 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs Angelo Bottoni, Paul Roberts, Tracie Serrano, and Shawnee Silva, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.
Case:-cv-00-LB Document Filed// Page of GALLO & ASSOCIATES Ray E. Gallo (State Bar No. 0) rgallo@gallo-law.com Dominic Valerian (State Bar No. 000) dvalerian@gallo-law.com Phone: () -0 Fax: () - Attorneys
More informationCase 3:07-cv SC Document 12 Filed 06/22/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case :0-cv-0-SC Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0-000 Mark R. Mittelman (SBN ) 0 North Wiget Lane, Suite Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -0 E-mail: mmittelman@mittellaw.com Attorneys
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SAEHAN BANK, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 09-CV-740-TCK-PJC STEVE YONG KIM; YOUNG SOON KIM; ) THE LODGING, INC., an Oklahoma
More informationPLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FREDDY GAVARRETE, KATHI FRIEZE, IGNACIO MENDOZA, DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COMPLAINT
Case: 3:10-cv-00527 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/15/2010 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE, Plaintiff, vs. MCKESSON CORPORATION, CASE NO.
More informationCase: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 02/09/16 Page: 1 of 30 PageID #: 1
Case: 4:16-cv-00172 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 02/09/16 Page: 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 RONALD McALLISTER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS THOMAS S. DENMAN on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC. Defendant. C.A. NO.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2016 02:11 PM INDEX NO. 156376/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/31/2014 10:27 AM INDEX NO. 653950/2014 NYSCEF
More information[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-00-ab-jem Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Gretchen M. Nelson, SBN # Email: gnelson@nflawfirm.com Gabriel S. Barenfeld, SBN # Email: gbarenfeld@nflawfirm.com NELSON & FRAENKEL LLP 0
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. State Bar No. ) OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP One Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, California Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 Email: jsagafi@outtengolden.com
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. IF YOU PURCHASED MERCHANDISE FROM SPORTS
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Thomas Pazo, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, Plaintiff, vs. Incredible Adventures, Inc., a California
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
0 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN (State Bar No. 0) (sliss@llrlaw.com) LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. Boylston Street, Suite 000 Boston, MA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 Attorney for Plaintiffs Jane Loes -,
More information8:17-cv RFR-FG3 Doc # 1 Filed: 05/26/17 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:17-cv-00179-RFR-FG3 Doc # 1 Filed: 05/26/17 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PHILIP J. INSINGA, Court File No. Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION UNITED
More informationFILED US DISTRICT COURT
Case 4:09-cv-00447-JLH Document 1 Filed 06/18/2009 Page 1 of 12 JOHN RICKE FILED US DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR JUN 81009 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 111 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1029
Case: 1:16-cv-04773 Document #: 111 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1029 ARTUR A. NISTRA, on behalf of The ) Bradford Hammacher Group, Inc. Employee ) Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a ) class
More informationINTRODUCTION. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant") pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and
1 g,...\1\', \ \llc I l.,tu U STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. JOSHUAH. STEIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES EDUARD SHAMIS, ) Case No.: BC662341 ) Plaintiffs, ) Assigned for All Purposes to ) The Hon. Maren E. Nelson, Dept. 17 v. ) ) NOTICE
More informationALFRED BRANDON and JUDAH BROWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Index No /2015
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF ROCKLAND ALFRED BRANDON and JUDAH BROWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Index No. 030859/2015 Plaintiffs, v. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT LOEB
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY JORGE TRELLES v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE DBA ACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITY CASE NOS. CGC-10-497727; CGC-11-509952 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION
More informationSTROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x GOLDMAN, SACHS & Co, Plaintiff, - against - CVR ENERGY, INC. Index No. 652149/2012 Date Filed: June 21, 2012 SUMMONS Defendant. x TO THE ABOVE
More informationCase 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7
Case 2:18-cv-03745-SJF-AYS Document 3 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION LORETTA A. ALLBERRY, } ON BEHALF OF HERSELF
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RICARDO SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, CASE NO. CIVDS1702554 v. Plaintiffs, NOTICE
More informationCase 2:14-cv JFW-MRW Document 24 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:91
Case :-cv-00-jfw-mrw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 DAVID R. ZARO (BAR NO. ) TED FATES (BAR NO. 0) TIM C. HSU (BAR NO. ) ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP South Figueroa Street, Ninth
More informationCase 1:13-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-10524-DJC Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Patricia Boudreau, Alex Gray, ) And Bobby Negron ) On Behalf of Themselves and
More information8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
8:18-cv-00014-DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENVILLE DIVISION JONATHAN ALSTON and DARIUS REID, individually
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION
Case 2:18-cv-03340 Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION NICHOLAS GIORDANO, } ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND } ALL
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 JEFFREY KALIEL (CA ) TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP L Street, NW, Suite 00 Washington, DC 00 Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0) -00 jkaliel@tzlegal.com ANNICK M. PERSINGER
More informationCase 7:18-cv NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs.
Case 7:18-cv-07683-NSR Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 6 BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC 100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500 Garden City, New York 11530 Tel: (516) 203-7600 Fax: (516) 706-5055 Email: ConsumerRights@BarshaySanders.com
More informationEFiled: Dec :46PM EST Transaction ID Case No
EFiled: Dec 13 2011 6:46PM EST Transaction ID 41379551 Case No. 7109- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERT D. KEYSER, JR., FRANK SALVATORE, and SCOTT SCHALK, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-216
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-216 HENDERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA on behalf of itself and all others similarly
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :08 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016
FILED KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/03/2016 1108 AM INDEX NO. 519469/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 11/03/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/13/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/13/2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS CONGREGATION HAKSHIVAH, d/b/a/ GEMACH L SIMCHOS Index No. 501104/2019 Plaintiff, - against - COMPLAINT HERSH DEUTSCH and DEUTSCHE VENTURE CAPITAL
More information2:17-cv AJT-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 07/11/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Case No.
2:17-cv-12244-AJT-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 07/11/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN PATRICK HARRIS AND JULIA DAVIS- HARRIS, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case: 1:18-cv-00004 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX DARYL RICHARDS and LORETTA S. BELARDO, on behalf of themselves and all others
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL R. O NEAL, RHONDA BIESEMEIER, and DENNIS J. NASRAWI SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL A. CONGER (State Bar # LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL A. CONGER P.O. Box San Dieguito Road, Suite -1 Rancho Santa Fe, California 0 Telephone: ( -000 Facsimile: ( -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL R. O
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PARSIFAL PARTNERS B, LP, - against - Plaintiff, CHRISTIAN ZUGEL, MICHAEL SZYMANSKI, R. BRUCE CAMERON, ZAIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. and BERKSHIRE CAPITAL
More informationReceived by Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two
No. E067711 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO MACY'S WEST STORES, INC., DBA MACY'S, AND MACY'S, INC., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
More informationCase 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:13-cv-05238-NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MARY ANNE CAPRIO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CSFB MORTGAGE-BACKED PASS-THROUGH, SERIES 2005-10, Index No. 850271/2015 -against- Plaintiff, ANSWER,
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Case 1:17-cv-08771 Document 1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 5 BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC 100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500 Garden City, New York 11530 Tel: (516) 203-7600 Fax: (516) 706-5055 Email: ConsumerRights@BarshaySanders.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, COLLEGEAMERICA DENVER, INC., n/k/a CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER
More informationORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES
ORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES Jose H. Solano et al. v. Kavlico Corporation, et al. Ventura County Superior Court
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2016 08:01 PM INDEX NO. 655490/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SEATGEEK, INC. - against -
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/05/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 198 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/05/2018
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NEW YORK MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Index No. 155743/15 Plaintiff, -against- LOW BID, INC., TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, and HACKENSACK
More informationMAR 2 Z Los Angeles, CA Telephone: (21 3) Facsimile: (2 1 3)
BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Senior Assistant Attorney General BENJAMIN G. DIEHL (Ca. Bar No. 192984) Deputy Attorney General 300 S. Spring Street, Suite
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/27/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 318 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/27/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE Of NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DISCOVER PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY Index No. 652933/20 12 COMPANY,
More informationCase 1:18-cv MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14
Case 1:18-cv-03628-MKB-RML Document 5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION JAROSLAW T. WOJCIK, } ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF
More informationIN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Larry Crane, Circuit/County Clerk 2018-May-04 11:39:22 60CV-18-2887 C06D16 : 5 Pages IN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION CENTENNIAL BANK
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Elizabeth Ortiz, et al. v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Company Superior Court of California, Alameda County, Case No. RG15764300 It is your responsibility to change
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Retiree Support Group of Contra Costa County v. Contra Costa County Case Number CV 12-00944 (JST) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 11
Case 2:18-cv-05664 Document 3 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION STEPHANIE HEATON, } ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND } ALL
More informationFName LName Addr1 Addr2 City, St Zip-Zip4
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOSE M. CASAS and ALEX JIMENEZ, et al., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
More informationThe plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION NO. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. ) ROY COOPER, Attorney General, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT vs. ) ) D. SCOTT
More informationCase 1:12-cv PKC Document 2 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04788-PKC Document 2 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 12 cw (~t. ~Tt:l ~",,"g 1.).,i Ld.J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE ROE and JANE DOE, individually and on the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 WILLIAM M. SHERNOFF (SBN ) wshernoff@shernoff.com SAMUEL L. BRUCHEY (SBN ) sbruchey@shernoff.com SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA LLP 0 N. Cañon Drive, Suite
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO MARY BARBER and ISABEL FERNANDEZ, Case No. 14CEG00166 KCK as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION
More informationATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS, ROBERT AGUIRRE, IRVING BEL TRAN, JAKE SERENO, 5 RONALD BEREND, KEITH BISPO
.. ~ I 1 EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS GROUP KARL GERBER (SBN 166003) 2 13418 VENTURA BLVD. SHERMAN OAKS, CA. 91423 3 TELEPHONE: (818) 783-7300 FACSIMILE: (818) 995-7159 4 '-bonformed COPY ORIGINAL PILED Superior
More informationCase 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14
Case 4:16-cv-00650-RGE-SBJ Document 59 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 14 DEBORAH INNIS, on behalf of the ) Telligen, Inc. Employee Stock ) Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a class ) of all other persons similarly
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/10/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 1186 BROADWAY TENANT LLC, and, 1186 BROADWAY RESTAURANT LLC, Plaintiffs, - against - KENNETH FRIEDMAN and BIERGARTEN, LLC, Defendants. Index No.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST MICHELLE COX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARYANNE TIERRA, individually and on behalf
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/31/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/31/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MUKENGESHAYI KALEMBA individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Index No. SUMMONS vs. OANDA CORPORATION, Defendant.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEAN P. BELLMOFF, and ) C.A. No.: BEATRICE E. SALAZAR ) ) Complex Commercial Plaintiffs, ) Litigation Division (CCLD) ) v. ) ALL ALLEGATIONS ) MUST BE ANSWERED
More informationCase 5:14-cv FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:14-cv-00912-FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION EVA MARISOL DUNCAN, Plaintiff, V. JPMORGAN CHASE
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-02117 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) PETER ENGER, ) KAREN CHAMBERLAIN, ) COURTNEY CREATER, ) GREGORY MCGEE,
More informationSUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE
Manwaring v. The Golden 1 Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING
More informationCase 2:18-cv JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 2:18-cv-00205-JAW Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE SHARON PAYEUR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT ATTEND THE HEARING DO NOTHING
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY If you subscribed to a Verizon Wireless Family SharePlan between May 11, 2002 and May 10, 2006, you could get benefits and your rights may be affected by a class
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/20/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------- x THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION,
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15
Case 2:18-cv-05774 Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION Kyle A. Page, } On behalf of Himself } All Others
More informationCase4:06-cv CW Document249 Filed09/20/11 Page1 of 22
Case:0-cv-00-CW Document Filed0// Page of 0 Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. ) kdermody@lchb.com Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. ) dhutchinson@lchb.com Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. ) ashaver@lchb.com
More informationD sa et al. v. Amber India Corp., et al San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC
NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF A CLASS ACTION AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. D sa et al. v. Amber India Corp., et al
More informationCase 1:16-cv SMV-WPL Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:16-cv-01290-SMV-WPL Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO FELIX A. GARCIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE NO. v. ) ) EQUIFAX INFORMATION
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/22/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/22/2018
2 of 9 4. Venue in this district is proper pursuant to CPLR 503 and 509. PAR TIES AND IMPORTANT ENTITY 5. Plaintiff Paragon provides a wide array of financial, budgetary, program design, staffing design,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ /24/ :33 02:50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2016 10/24/2016 01:33 02:50 PM INDEX NO. 655524/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016 10/24/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1
Case 1:17-cv-03139 Document 1 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------x JACQUELINE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
Document Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: PRICEVILLE PARTNERS, LLC, Stuart M. Maples, Trustee for PRICEVILLE PARTNERS, LCC, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationWORKWEEK DISPUTE FORM
WORKWEEK DISPUTE FORM CPT ID: «ID» SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO James v. Park N Fly Service, LLC et al. Case No. 17CIV05465 CPT ID: 1 *1* Aanenson, Taylor Alan
More informationVERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, WASTE OF CORPORATE ASSETS, AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT
EFiled: Jun 06 2014 06:03PM EDT Transaction ID 55558753 Case No. 9745- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ERNESTO ESPINOZA, derivatively on behalf of FACEBOOK, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No.
More informationCase 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:12-cv-03628-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANGELA ZBOROWSKI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:
OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT & DECEMBER 17, 2014 FAIRNESS HEARING Chris Lange, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ricoh Americas Corporation, a New York Corporation,
More informationG~ Z Q S m v83g(niwj9b686bnesmfbentrilecfiiroslp09$9 Phys11 adf183 CASE NO: The Plaintiff, GERALDINE ROBINSON, by and through her attorneys, ZISA &
G~ Z Q S m v83g(niwj9b686bnesmfbentrilecfiiroslp09$9 Phys11 adf183 Trisha M. Connors, Esq. ZISA R HITSCHERICH 77 HUDSON STREET HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY 07601 (201) 342-1103 Attorneys for Plaintiff GERALDINE
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT In Re Wachovia Securities, LLC, Wage and Hour Litigation Multi-District Litigation No. 1807 U.S. District Court
More informationSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SOLANO
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SOLANO GENNADIY TUZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. CAMPBELLS CARPETS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.: FCS028149 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RANDAL SIMONETTI, SHAMIM BOYCE, ROBERT EBERTZ, MARY JO YATTEAU, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff vs. JOSEPH
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garcia, et al. v. Lowe s et al. Superior Court, County of San Diego, Case No. GIC
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garcia, et al. v. Lowe s et al. Superior Court, County of San Diego, Case No. GIC 841120 ATTENTION: THIS NOTICE EXPLAINS YOUR RIGHT TO RECOVER MONEY AS THE RESULT OF A
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 1 1, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, THE CRYPTO COMPANY, MICHAEL ALCIDE POUTRE III,
More informationDO NOTHING EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE CLASS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO California Entities That Compensated Sutter Health for Their Members Health Care Could Be Included in a Class Action Lawsuit A court authorized this
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ADVERSARY COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: BKY Case No.: 08-46367 ARC Venture Holding, Inc., et al., Chapter 7 (Jointly Administered) Debtors. 1 Brian F. Leonard, Trustee, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 Hank Bates (Bar No. hbates@cbplaw.com Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC West th Street Little Rock, Arkansas 01 Telephone: (01 1-00 Facsimile: (01 1-0 Brandon M. Haubert (pro hac vice pending brandon@whlawoffices.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. Doc. Case :0-cv-0-MJJ Document Filed 0//00 Page of LEE H. RUBIN (SBN ) SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 0) Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 00 Palo Alto, CA 0 Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0)
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO American Mortgage Company Case No. 555555 Plaintiff Judge Janet R. Brown v. DEFENDANT S ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT Vicki Smith, et.
More informationCase3:15-cv WHO Document30 Filed07/14/15 Page1 of 45
Case3:15-cv-01806-WHO Document30 Filed07/14/15 Page1 of 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WILLIAM McGRANE [057761] McGRANE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California
More informationCase No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.
Case :-cv-00-bas-ags Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of FISCHERR AVENUE, UNIT D COSTA MESA, CA 0 Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. (0) ak@kazlg.com Mona Amini, Esq. () mona@kazlg.com Veronica Cruz, Esq. () veronica@kazlg.com
More informationDELL SERVICE CONTRACT TAX REFUND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ( SBE Settlement )
LEGAL NOTICE DELL SERVICE CONTRACT TAX REFUND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ( SBE Settlement ) Mohan, et al. v. Dell Inc., et al. Superior Court (San Francisco) Case Nos. CGC 03-419192; CJC-05-004442 NOTICE OF CLASS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA BLOOMFIELD, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SYNTAX-BRILLIAN CORP., VINCENT SOLLITTO, JR., JAMES LI and
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-02647 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/30/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC. Plaintiff,
More information