IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
|
|
- Baldwin Hancock
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO American Mortgage Company Case No Plaintiff Judge Janet R. Brown v. DEFENDANT S ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT Vicki Smith, et. al. Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff v. GL National Mortgage Company 444 West Main Street Cleveland, OH and Nick Sawyer 555 West Main Street Cleveland, OH Now comes Defendant, Vicki Smith, by and through counsel and for her Answer, states: 1. As to Paragraphs 1,1, 2 and 3 of Plaintiff s complaint, Defendant admits that she executed a promissory note and mortgage. However, she denies for want of knowledge whether the note and mortgage attached to Plaintiff s complaint are that note and mortgage. Defendant denies being in default under the terms of the note and mortgage, that the balance was rightfully and correctly accelerated, as well as all other allegations in Paragraph s 1, 1, 2 and 3 not specifically admitted, herein. 2. Defendant states that she is, and was, unmarried for all relevant times, herein. Further,
2 Defendant denies all other allegations not specifically admitted, herein. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 3. Plaintiff s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 4. Plaintiff s claims are barred by laches. 5. Plaintiff s claims are barred by estoppel. 6. Plaintiff s claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands. 7. Plaintiff s claims are barred by waiver. 8. Plaintiff s claims are barred by its own negligence. 9. Plaintiff is not the real party in interest. 10. Plaintiff has not joined all parties that are necessary to this litigation. 11. Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 12. Plaintiff s claims are barred by the wrongful acts of its employees or agents. 11. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the terms of the note and mortgage, when accelerating the balance due, as prayed for in the complaint. COUNTERCLAIMS COUNT I (HOEPA DISCLOSURES 12. Paragraphs 1 through 11 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 13. Defendant, Ms. Vicki Smith ( Smith executed a note and mortgage in favor of American Mortgage Company ( American on or about December 17, 2002 ( The Loan. 14. Because American is a creditor and Smith is a consumer, as defined by 15 U.S.C (f and (h, respectively, The Loan is covered by The Truth-In-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C et. seq. ( TILA. 15. The Loan is contemplated by 15 U.S.C (aa(1(b(i, because the total points and
3 fees payable by Smith at closing exceeded 8% of the total loan amount. As such, The Loan was subject to the requirements of 15 U.S.C (Which requirements were added to TILA, as part of an amendment entitled the Home Ownership Equity and Protection Act, or HOEPA 16. Because the prepaid finance charges in the loan were, more than 8% of the amount financed, American was required to submit certain disclosures to Smith. Specifically, American was required to provide, in conspicuous type size the following language: You are not required to complete this agreement merely because you have signed a loan application. And If you obtain this loan, the lender will have a mortgage on your home. You could lose your home, and any money you have put in to it, if you do not meet your obligations under the loan (15 U.S.C (a 17. Although these disclosures were required to be given to the borrower, not less than three days prior to the closing of the transaction (15 U.S.C (b(1, they were not. 18. Because the disclosures mentioned in Para 16, above, were not given to Smith in a timely fashion, (or, as in this case, not at all she has the right to formally rescind the transaction pursuant to 15 U.S.C (15 U.S.C (j. (Which she has done, concurrent with the filing of this Answer. (Rescission letter attached hereto as exhibit A. 19. Because American did not comply with the requirements of TILA enumerated above, Smith is entitled to formally rescind the transaction, to statutory damages, actual damages, the return of all finance charges and fees paid by the consumer, the return of all monthly payments under the loan and reasonable attorney fees, according to 15 U.S.C COUNT II (MISCALCULATION TOLERANCE ECLIPSED 20. Paragraphs 1 through 19 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 21. Once a loan is determined to be contemplated by TILA, the lender is forbidden from understating the prepaid finance charges by predetermined amounts.
4 22. American understated the applicable prepaid finance charges in the loan by more than the allowable amount. 23. Because of the miscalculation mentioned in Para 18, above, Defendant is entitled to formally rescind the transaction, to statutory damages, actual damages and reasonable attorney fees. THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (BACKGROUND FACTS 24. Paragraphs 1 through 23 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 25. Nick Sawyer is a mortgage broker who regularly transacts business as a mortgage broker in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. 26. Sawyer was involved in the loan, on behalf of Defendant Smith, as a mortgage broker, while working for GL National Mortgage Company. 27. Sawyer convinced Smith to refinance her house and enter into the loan, promising, among other things, a lower interest rate than the one she was currently obligated for. 28. Sawyer convince Smith to enter into the loan, merely to benefit himself in the form of broker fees and other compensation that was to arise from Smith entering into the loan. 29. The closing of the loan took place in Sawyer s office, rather than the title company address that is indicated on the loan documents. 30. Sawyer, who is intimate with the characteristics, requirements and workings of the consumer lending industry and who has knowledge superior to Defendant Smith in matters of the type that is the subject of Plaintiff s complaint, used his position as a broker, previous acquaintance and then current part-time employer of Smith, to convince her to execute the documents that comprise The Loan. 31. At the loan closing, Smith indicated that she could not afford to make the monthly
5 payments that were called for in the loan. 32. In response to the allegation cited in paragraph 29, above, Sawyer pressured and intimidated Smith into signing the loan papers, by trivializing her concern about the payment amount by assuring her that her part-time employment for The GL National Mortgage Company ( GL would soon become full-time employment, yielding enough to substantiate the increased payment amount, and by making certain statements that amounted to duress. 33. Sawyer made the statements above for the purpose of convincing Smith to execute The Loan, so that he could obtain the various types of compensation that would be due to him as a result of the loan. 34. The loan contained an interest rate that was higher than the interest rate that Smith was obligated to pay on her current note, in contravention to Sawyer s promise that the interest rate would be lower. 35. Prior to the date Smith was to sign the loan, Sawyer advised her to refrain from paying her, then, current mortgage payment, to her detriment. 36. Upon information and belief, Nick Sawyer is an officer, part owner and/or principal of GL. 37. Upon information and belief, Sawyer stood to be compensated for the business that was done by GL, in addition to any compensation that he was to receive as a mortgage broker, whether monetary or otherwise, when the Smith loan closed. COUNT III (OHIO MORTGAGE BROKER ACT 38. Paragraphs 1 through 37 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 39. Sawyer is a loan officer, as defined by O.R.C (E. 40. Sawyer made false or misleading statements to Smith, when he threatened her and made statements that were designed to pressure her into signing the loan, when he told her that she
6 would receive a lower interest rate than the one that she was currently paying, in order to convince her to enter into a refinance loan with GL, and when he assured her that her part-time employment would blossom and remunerated her in an amount that would enable her to make the objectionable monthly payments, in violation of O.R.C (A, as he never intended to fulfill these promises, or made them with the knowledge that they were untrue. 41. Sawyer engaged in conduct that constitute[d] improper, fraudulent, or dishonest deallings, when he misrepresented the actual interest rate in order to induce Smith to apply for a refinance loan with GL when he threatened and pressured Smith to sign for the loan at closing, and when he assured her that her part-time employment grow (as depicted above even though she was expressing her unwillingness to do so, in violation of O.R.C (C. 42. At all times, Sawyer acted with a conscious, willful and malicious disregard for the rights and safety of Vicki Smith, knowing that there was a great probability that his acts would cause harm to Smith. 43. Sawyer is liable to Smith in the amount of statutory, actual and punitive damages, pursuant to O.R.C , as well as attorney fees. COUNT IV (BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY 44. Paragraphs 1 through 43 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 45. Sawyer, as Smith s mortgage broker was acting as her paid fiduciary and owed her the typical duties of care that a fiduciary owes to his customer. 46. Because Sawyer acted as Smith s fiduciary, he owed her the duty of good faith and loyalty, which prohibits self-dealing, which includes preclusion from making personal profit out of any transaction in which the fiduciary acts on behalf of his principal.
7 47. Sawyer breached the aforementioned duty by misrepresenting the amount of the interest rate that Smith qualified for, by threatening her and making other statements that were intended to induce Smith to sign the loan documents after she indicated her unwillingness to do so, by obtaining a loan for Smith that contained terms that were patently worse than the terms of The Loan under which Smith was the currently, obligated to pay, so he could benefit himself by obtaining the compensation that he was to receive as the mortgage broker and as a principal of GL. 48. Because of the aforementioned breach of fiduciary duty, Sawyer is liable to Smith in an amount to be determined by this court. COUNT V (FRAUD 49. Paragraphs 1 through 48 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 50. When Sawyer made the statements outlined above, he had a duty to be truthful with her about the consequences and circumstances of The Loan, by virtue of his position as a loan officer in the state of Ohio and by virtue of his position as a fiduciary. 51. The facts that Vasquez concealed, and the misrepresentations that were made were material to the transaction at hand. 52. Said omissions and misrepresentations were made with the knowledge of their falsity, or with such utter disregard and recklessness as to whether they were true or false and with the intent of misleading Palmer into relying upon them. 53. The reliance of Smith on the statements and omissions that were made by Sawyer was justifiable, given the circumstances, and said reliance resulted in injury to Smith, as the instant lawsuit will attest.
8 54. At all times, Sawyer acted with a conscious, willful and malicious disregard for the rights and safety of Vicki Smith, knowing that there was a great probability that his acts would cause harm to Smith. 55. Because of the actions and omissions outlined above, Sawyer has committed Fraud upon Smith, and is liable to her in an amount to be determined by this court. COUNT VII (DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE 56. Paragraphs 1 through 55 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein 57. At the time that the loan was to close, Smith expressed her concern that the monthly payments on The Loan were too much for her to pay, in light of her monthly income. 58. When confronted with the concerns that were raised by Palmer in Para 57, above, Sawyer misrepresented to Smith that her part-time job (which at the time was working for Sawyer at GL would become full-time and provide her enough money to meet the obligation for which she was about to sign and made other statements, which were designed to pressure her into signing the documents, against her will. 59. The statements, above, were made by Sawyer to Smith at the time of the closing of The Loan in order to induce her to sign for a loan that she was unable to afford. 60. Sawyer used his position as a prior acquaintance and current employer, his superior knowledge as a long-time member of the consumer lending industry, his position as a mortgage broker and the statements enumerated above to induce Smith to sign for The Loan. 61. Given Smith s relationship with Sawyer, as a past customer and current employee, it was reasonable for her to rely on the promises made by Sawyer. Furthermore, she relied on those promises to her detriment.
9 62. As a result of the reliance mentioned above, Smith was damaged, and Sawyer is liable to her in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT VIII (RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR 63. Paragraphs 1 through 62 are hereby realleged and reasserted as if fully rewritten, herein. 64. At all times relevant, herein, Sawyer was an employee of GL, all actions taken by him were in the course and scope of his employment and with the knowledge of GL. 65. Pursuant to the doctrine of Respondeat Superior, GL is liable for the wrongs committed by it s employee, herein. 66. Defendant Smith hereby reasserts all claims made against Sawyer, against GL. 67. GL is, therefore liable to Smith for all claims that she has made against Sawyer, herein, as well as all damages that she has suffered as a result of Sawyer s wrongdoing. WHEREFORE, As to her counterclaims, Defendant Respectfully request the following relief: 1. That Plaintiff s complaint be dismissed with prejudice 2. That this court find that Plaintiff has no right to foreclose on Defendant Smith s residence 3. That Plaintiff s security interest in Defendant Smith s property is void as the result of the valid rescission of the note and mortgage performed by Smith. 4. That Plaintiff is responsible to pay for the costs of the within action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C That Plaintiff is responsible to pay for the reasonable attorney fees that Defendant Smith has had to incur as the result of the within action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C That Plaintiff is liable to Defendant Smith for statutory, and actual damages in an amount to exceed Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25, , pursuant to 15 U.S.C Such other relief that this court deems to be appropriate. WHEREFORE, As to her Third-party Complaint, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff requests the following relief: 1. That if any judgment is to be rendered against, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff that such judgment is the result of the violations and acts of Third party Defendants, Sawyer and GL, and
10 that Third party Defendants Sawyer and GL are liable to indemnify Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Smith in an amount equal to any monetary judgment that is rendered. 2. That Third party Defendants Sawyer and GL are responsible to pay for the costs of the within action, pursuant to O.R.C That, as a result of Third party Defendant Sawyer s and GL fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Smith has been damaged in an amount to exceed Twenty- Five Thousand Dollars ($25, , plus punitive damages. 4. That Third party Defendants Sawyer and GL are liable to Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Smith as a result of Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Smith s detrimental reliance in an amount to exceed Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25, , plus punitive damages. 5. That Third party Defendants Sawyer and GL are liable to Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Smith for her attorney fees pursuant to O.R.C (A(2. 6. That Third party Defendants Sawyer and GL are liable to Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Smith for statutory and punitive damages pursuant to O.R.C Such other relief as the court deems appropriate. Attorney for the Plaintiff
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ QUATTRO PARENT LLC, ZAKI RAKIB, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, - against - Defendant/Counterclaim
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/08/ :32 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 106 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS HEZI TORATI : Index No. 514251/2017 : Plaintiff, : AMENDED : ANSWER AND -against- : COUNTERCLAIMS : YOSSEF HAZUT, et al. : : Defendant. : : DEFENDANT,
More informationCase 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 2:18-cv-03095-SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Alejandro Carrillo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel
CASE 0:11-cv-01319-MJD -FLN Document 1 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA R.J. ZAYED, In His Capacity as Court- Appointed Receiver for Trevor G. Cook, et al.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE : : : : : : : : Defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FORBA HOLDINGS, LLC Plaintiff, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. NO 310-CV-1018 JUDGE HAYNES MAGISTRATE
More informationCase 3:11-cv WGY Document 168 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:11-cv-00282-WGY Document 168 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE STRATEGIES, INC., Plan Administrator of the Healthcare Strategies,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, VASCO DATA SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC., T. KENDALL
More informationCASE NO.: 10-""Jt{t--6"J 9 0 2CA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JSSI CAPITAL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and THE FRANKLIN MINT, LLC, a Delaware Limited
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.: JUDGE
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. MIKE DEWINE, OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charitable Law Section 150 E. Gay St. Columbus, Ohio 43215, CASE NO.: JUDGE v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT
More information8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
8:18-cv-00014-DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENVILLE DIVISION JONATHAN ALSTON and DARIUS REID, individually
More informationPLF Claims Made Excess Plan
2019 PLF Claims Made Excess Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION I COVERAGE AGREEMENT... 1 A. Indemnity...1 B. Defense...1 C. Exhaustion of Limit...2 D. Coverage Territory...2 E. Basic Terms
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS THOMAS S. DENMAN on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC. Defendant. C.A. NO.
More informationCase 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cv-03680-VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, DICK
More informationMANAGING YOUR DEBT. An Informational and Educational Guide for Residents of New York State
MANAGING YOUR DEBT An Informational and Educational Guide for Residents of New York State Designed and Provided by the Rural Law Center of New York, Inc. Rural Law Center of New York, Inc. WHAT TO DO WHEN
More informationHome Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine
Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine Find more easy-to-read legal information at www.ptla.org Important Note: This is very general information about home mortgage and foreclosure rules in Maine. It is not
More informationHome Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine
Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine Find more easy-to-read legal information at www.ptla.org Important Note: This is very general information about home mortgage and foreclosure rules in Maine. It is not
More informationDEFENDANT, TYLER KUKAHIKO'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND COUNTER-CLAIMS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 10 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HIGHLANDS COUNTY, FLORIDA JACKELIN MAVIS, ELLIS MAVIS, RICHARD MAVIS, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN TENANTS NO. 1, UNKNOWN TENANTS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SAEHAN BANK, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 09-CV-740-TCK-PJC STEVE YONG KIM; YOUNG SOON KIM; ) THE LODGING, INC., an Oklahoma
More informationCase 2:16-ap Doc 1 Filed 04/22/16 Entered 04/22/16 19:32:02 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 32
Document Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION In re: John Joseph Louis Johnson, III, Debtor. John Joseph Louis Johnson, III 5309 Adventure Drive Dublin,
More informationCase 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Case 3:14-cv-00535-HU Document 1 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Attorney for the Silva Family US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., 31st Fl. Portland, OR 97204
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CSFB MORTGAGE-BACKED PASS-THROUGH, SERIES 2005-10, Index No. 850271/2015 -against- Plaintiff, ANSWER,
More informationI c~~ U.S. DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TE AS or: ') 0 ' :. v 4- - i..-'-' v) GREG PRICE, On Behalf of Himself And All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, UNITED GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL INSURANCE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Case No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, V. AZZ, INC., THOMAS E. FERGUSON, and PAUL
More informationCORPORATIONS Copyright February State Bar of California
CORPORATIONS Copyright February 2001 - State Bar of California Adam owns 100% of the stock of Sellco, a corporation that sells houses. Sellco's board of directors consists of Adam and his wife Betty. Sellco
More informationCase 1:16-cv CBA-SMG Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-03948-CBA-SMG Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationagainst Defendants TempWorks Management Services, Inc. ( TempWorks Management ),
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Diamond Staffing, LLC, Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: 14. Other Civil Judge: Court File No.: v. COMPLAINT TempWorks Management Services,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION ASSURANCE TITLE COMPANY, INC. ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) TERRY G. VANN, MIKE ROSS, TRACY RIEDL, ) Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-252
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-cjc-jc Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 KENNETH J. GUIDO, Cal. Bar No. 000 E-mail: guidok@sec.gov Attorney for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission 0 F Street, N.E. Washington,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT
Filing # 77225632 E-Filed 08/30/2018 09:49:32 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL
More informationCase 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :
Case 217-cv-04127-SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 LAWRENCE C. HERSH Attorney at Law 17 Sylvan Street, Suite 102B Rutherford, NJ 07070 (201) 507-6300 Attorney for Plaintiff, and
More information4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 6395 Filed 08/17/2009 Page 1 of 21 Trisha M. Connors, Esq. ZISA & HITSCHERICH 77 HUDSON STREET HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY 07601 (201) 342-1103 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PERRY MUGNO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 1 1, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, THE CRYPTO COMPANY, MICHAEL ALCIDE POUTRE III,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2016 08:01 PM INDEX NO. 655490/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SEATGEEK, INC. - against -
More informationIN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Larry Crane, Circuit/County Clerk 2018-May-04 11:39:22 60CV-18-2887 C06D16 : 5 Pages IN CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION CENTENNIAL BANK
More informationCase 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-01691 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Case No. JUDGE RTB
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-02064 Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) WESTPORT
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/13/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/13/2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS CONGREGATION HAKSHIVAH, d/b/a/ GEMACH L SIMCHOS Index No. 501104/2019 Plaintiff, - against - COMPLAINT HERSH DEUTSCH and DEUTSCHE VENTURE CAPITAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 WILLIAM M. SHERNOFF (SBN ) wshernoff@shernoff.com SAMUEL L. BRUCHEY (SBN ) sbruchey@shernoff.com SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA LLP 0 N. Cañon Drive, Suite
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION. Case No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., DAVID J. LANGEVIN, DAVID
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-437-DJH NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY
Case 3:18-cv-00437-DJH-RSE Document 13 Filed 08/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 68 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-437-DJH NAVIGATORS
More informationCase 9:18-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE#
Case 9:18-cv-80428-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE# SOPHIA KAMBITSIS, Individually and on behalf of all others
More informationProcedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions
Procedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions New York City Bar Association October 24, 2016 Eric A. Portuguese Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP 1 Introduction Purpose of
More informationFILED US DISTRICT COURT
Case 4:09-cv-00447-JLH Document 1 Filed 06/18/2009 Page 1 of 12 JOHN RICKE FILED US DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR JUN 81009 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
More informationPLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 4:11-cv-03545 Document 13 Filed in TXSD on 01/25/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationORIGINAL. -l^ K CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 '7 L'I FEB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
j K- -l^ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ORIGINAL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, V. Plaintiff SWANK ENERGY INCOME ADVISERS, LP, SWANK CAPITAL, LLC, JERRY
More informationAs Reported by the House Judiciary Committee. 131st General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No
131st General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No. 181 2015-2016 Senators Obhof, Schiavoni Cosponsors: Senators Bacon, Eklund, Seitz, LaRose, Beagle, Brown, Burke, Coley, Hughes, Jones, Lehner, Manning,
More informationFILLING OUT THE ANSWER
EMPIRE JUSTICE CENTER 31 FILLING OUT THE ANSWER Below is the form Answer provided in this guidebook. STEP 1: FILL OUT THE CAPTION OF THE ANSWER - As shown in the sample Answer below, fill in the top part
More informationMORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE
MORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE In the past, we have provided several articles discussing the then latest form of mortgage fraud and the ways to spot it and avoid it. Also, in the past we have commented on the lack
More informationif such offense is committed within the United States of America, its territories or possessions, or Canada.
This Certificate is issued in accordance with the limited authorization granted under Contract to the Correspondent by certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, whose names and the proportions underwritten
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
American National Property and Casualty Company v. Stutte et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 141 Filed: 12/06/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1455
Case: 1:16-cv-04773 Document #: 141 Filed: 12/06/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1455 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ARTUR A. NISTRA, on behalf of The ) Bradford Hammacher
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, COLLEGEAMERICA DENVER, INC., n/k/a CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER
More informationCase 1:16-cv UU Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:16-cv-20245-UU Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION THOMAS E. PEREZ, ) Secretary of Labor,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff. Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, SKY SOLAR HOLDINGS, LTD., WEILI SU, and JIANMIN WANG, Defendants.
More informationTITLE LOAN AGREEMENT
Borrower(s): Name: Address: Motor Vehicle: Year Color Make TITLE LOAN AGREEMENT Lender: Drivers License Number VIN Title Certificate Number Model Date of Loan ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE The cost of your credit
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CLIFTON CUNNINGHAM and DON TEED, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, FEDERAL EXPRESS
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION
STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF COOK ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CITIMORTGAGE INC., SUCCESSOR BY ) REASON OF MERGER WITH CITIFINANCIAL ) MORTGAGE COMPANY,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 TAREK ELTANBDAWY v. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MMG INSURANCE COMPANY, RESTORECARE, INC., KUAN FANG CHENG Appellees No. 2243
More informationThe plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION NO. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. ) ROY COOPER, Attorney General, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT vs. ) ) D. SCOTT
More informationERISA Causes of Action *
1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants
More informationCase 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:13-cv-05238-NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MARY ANNE CAPRIO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationSettling With Contentious Debtors Who May Have Little Or No Assets (With Sample Agreed Order)
Settling With Contentious Debtors Who May Have Little Or No Assets (With Sample Agreed Order) J. Grant McGuire Collection litigation can be expensive and timeconsuming. In many cases, agreed judgments
More informationmuia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:15cw05146CA&JEM Document 1 fled 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMA-CBS Document 22 Filed 02/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18
Case 1:14-cv-03508-CMA-CBS Document 22 Filed 02/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 Civil Action No. 14-CV-3508-CMA-CBS KATHRYN ROMSTAD and MARGARETHE BENCH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationBANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 7 (aka Discharge or Liquidation )
BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 7 (aka Discharge or Liquidation ) ANSWERS TO THE MOST COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS Compliments of: Sam C. Gregory, PLLC 2742 82 nd Street Lubbock, Texas 79423 (806) 687-4357 1. What is chapter
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs Angelo Bottoni, Paul Roberts, Tracie Serrano, and Shawnee Silva, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.
Case:-cv-00-LB Document Filed// Page of GALLO & ASSOCIATES Ray E. Gallo (State Bar No. 0) rgallo@gallo-law.com Dominic Valerian (State Bar No. 000) dvalerian@gallo-law.com Phone: () -0 Fax: () - Attorneys
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 mfuller@olsendaines.com 9415 SE Stark St., Suite 207 Office: (503) 274-4252 Fax: (503) 362-1375 Cell: (503) 201-4570 Justin Baxter, Oregon Bar No. 992178 justin@baxterlaw.com
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2016 02:11 PM INDEX NO. 156376/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/31/2014 10:27 AM INDEX NO. 653950/2014 NYSCEF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW NATURE OF THE ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLES H. YEATTS, on behalf of ) himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No.: ) OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION, ) ROBERT
More informationLAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CLAIMS-MADE POLICY
LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CLAIMS-MADE POLICY COVERAGE DEFENSE AND SETTLEMENT TERRITORY WE will pay, subject to OUR limit of liability, all DAMAGES the INSURED may be legally obligated to
More informationMango Bay Properties & Investments dba Mango Bay Mortgage
WHOLESALE BROKER AGREEMENT This Wholesale Broker Agreement (the Agreement ) is entered into on this day of between Mango Bay Property and Investments Inc. dba Mango Bay Mortgage (MBM) and ( Broker ). RECITALS
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:18-cv-00886 Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X Case No. 18-cv-00886
More informationCase3:15-cv WHO Document30 Filed07/14/15 Page1 of 45
Case3:15-cv-01806-WHO Document30 Filed07/14/15 Page1 of 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WILLIAM McGRANE [057761] McGRANE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT
Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Special Counsel for Debtor michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON In re Michael Rolf Gustafson, Debtor.
More informationCase 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:18-cv-00027 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SUSAN PASKOWITZ, Individually and On Behalf
More informationClinical and Administrative Policies and Procedures
Clinical and Administrative Policies and Procedures Purpose: Centerstone is committed to its role in preventing health care fraud and abuse and complying with applicable state and federal law related to
More information4:17-cv RBH Date Filed 06/16/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
4:17-cv-01589-RBH Date Filed 06/16/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA PAUL PARSHALL, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
More informationAmiad Water Systems Ltd. Indemnification and Exemption Agreement
Amiad Water Systems Ltd. Indemnification and Exemption Agreement This Indemnification and Exemption Agreement entered into on the 11 day of March, 2018 by and between Amiad Water Systems Ltd., an Israeli
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. State Bar No. ) OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP One Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, California Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 Email: jsagafi@outtengolden.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT
PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA Plaintiff, WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, GEORGE M. AWAD, DENMAR
More informationCase 3:17-cv BR Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00117-BR Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 21 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Trial Attorney for Estrella Rex Daines, OSB No. 952442 Of Attorneys for Estrella Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/10/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 1186 BROADWAY TENANT LLC, and, 1186 BROADWAY RESTAURANT LLC, Plaintiffs, - against - KENNETH FRIEDMAN and BIERGARTEN, LLC, Defendants. Index No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Case No:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EXTERRAN CORPORATION, ANDREW J. WAY, and JON
More informationCase 1:15-cv GHW Document 1 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:15-cv-06929-GHW Document 1 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ABBY LEIGH, individually and as executrix for the ESTATE OF MITCH
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA
FILED: DUVAL COUNTY, RONNIE FUSSELL, CLERK, 01/08/2016 09:35:00 AM 16-2016-CA-000136-XXXX-MA Filing# 36226141 E-Filed 01/06/2016 03:08:41 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
More informationCase 1:09-cv JSR Document 43 Filed 10/30/2009 Page 1 of 9. : : v.
Case 109-cv-06829-JSR Document 43 Filed 10/30/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X SECURITIES
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS 21ST CENTURY PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION May 24, 2016 9:15 a.m. v No. 325657 Oakland Circuit Court BARRY ZUFELT
More informationFiscal Sponsorship Agreement
Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement Program Account Name: Account #: Date: Program Manager Name: Address: Email: Phone Number: Please initial each page certifying that you agree with and understand the terms
More informationEmployed Lawyers Liability Coverage Part
Employed Lawyers Liability Coverage Part In consideration of the payment of the premium and subject to all terms, conditions and limitations of this Coverage Part and the General Terms and Conditions for
More informationCase 3:12-cv IEG-BGS Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ieg-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0 0 Joseph J. Siprut* jsiprut@siprut.com Aleksandra M.S. Vold* avold@siprut.com SIPRUT PC N. State Street, Suite 00 Chicago, Illinois 00..0000 Fax:.. Todd
More informationCase 5:14-cv FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:14-cv-00912-FB-JWP Document 1 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION EVA MARISOL DUNCAN, Plaintiff, V. JPMORGAN CHASE
More informationJujitsu Techniques for Enforcing & Defending Contract Liability Claims
Jujitsu Techniques for Enforcing & Defending Contract Liability Claims January 19, 2017 Jeryl Bowers Sheppard Mullin Partner, Los Angeles T +310-229-3713 M +213-926-3800 jbowers@sheppardmullin.com Sheppard
More informationCUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 3:18-cv-00895-HTW-LRA Document 1 Filed 12/28/18 Page 1 of 16 CUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CHRIS NOONE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE No:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 09-CV-367
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 09-CV-367 LENDINGTREE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MORTECH, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE
More informationCase 1:19-cv DLI-SJB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1
Case 1:19-cv-00839-DLI-SJB Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GUY D. LIVINGSTONE, - against - Plaintiff, ECF CASE Index No. 19-839
More informationCase 3:13-cv AC Document 1 Filed 03/09/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Case 3:13-cv-00405-AC Document 1 Filed 03/09/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 1 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Trial Attorney for Plaintiff Eric Olsen, Oregon Bar No. 783261 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 9415
More informationLAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED POLICY PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED POLICY PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THIS POLICY IS WRITTEN ON A CLAIMS-MADE AND REPORTED BASIS AND PROVIDES PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE H. DAVID MANLEY, ) ) No. 390, 2008 Defendant Below, ) Appellant, ) Court Below: Superior Court ) of the State of Delaware in v. ) and for Sussex County ) MAS
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT
Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Special Counsel for Ms. Knight Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 Kelly D.
More information