Case Name: Signum Corp. v. Peterborough (City) [Wal-Mart Canada Corp. Application]
|
|
- Vanessa Jocelin Rice
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Update Week Planning Case Name: Signum Corp. v. Peterborough (City) [Wal-Mart Canada Corp. Application] Wal-Mart Canada Corp has brought a motion before the Ontario Municipal Board under section 17(45) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, to dismiss the appeals without holding a full hearing OMB File Nos. O040056, R040064, R [2004] O.M.B.D. No. 879 File Nos. PL040327, O040056, R040064, R Ontario Municipal Board M. Hubbard, Chair and S.B. Campbell, Vice-Chair Oral decision: August 12, Filed: August 26, (19 paras.) COUNSEL: S.A. Zakem, for Wal-Mart Canada Corp. H.G. Elston, for Signum Corporation. J.W. Hart, for City of Peterborough.
2 Page 2 M.L. Flynn-Guglietti, for Portage Place Limited. DECISION OF M. HUBBARD AND S.B. CAMPBELL, DELIVERED ON A MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER OF THE BOARD:-- Motions: 1 Signum Corporation ("Signum") has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (the "Board") under subsection 17(24) of the Planning Act (the "Act") in regard to Official Plan Amendment No. 126 of the City of Peterborough ("OPA 126") and further, has appealed to the Board under subsection 34(19) of the Act in regard to Zoning By-Law Nos and of the City of Peterborough ("the by-laws"). Wal-Mart Canada Corp. ("Wal-Mart") has brought a motion under subsections 17(45) and 34(25) of the Act to dismiss the appeals. 2 Wal-Mart seeks its costs incurred in bringing this motion on a substantial indemnity basis. Background: 3 Wal-Mart proposes to relocate and expand its existing store, which is currently located in the Portage Place Shopping Centre to a freestanding location in the vicinity of the shopping centre. The proposed store is to consist of 133,555 square feet, while the existing store consists of 96,500 square feet. 4 To accommodate this proposal, Wal-Mart applied to the City of Peterborough (the "City") for an amendment to its Official Plan and for two zoning by-law amendments. The Official Plan Amendment, OPA 126, allows for an adjustment in the boundaries of the Portage Node, one of four Shopping Nodes designated in the Official Plan. OPA 126 expands the Portage Node by including the site proposed for the new Wal-Mart store and redesignating the site to permit commercial uses. The zoning by-laws allow for the proposed commercial use of the site, implement appropriate performance standards and allow for the reorganization and remerchandising of the former Wal-Mart space by providing for flexibility in respect of unit sizes and total floor space permitted. 5 Wal-Mart's applications were filed with the City in July 2003 and were subsequently circulated. A number of reports, including a Market Justification and Impact Report, were submitted in support of the applications. A neighbourhood public meeting and the statutory public meeting were held in February A staff report was filed with City Council in February 2004 recommending approval of the Wal-Mart applications. OPA 126 and the by-laws were passed by Counsel at a meeting held on March 8, In September 2001 Signum applied to the City to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law
3 Page to permit development of a site located in the southern portion of the City. The development proposed for the site is a 250,000 square foot commercial retail facility, including a department store. In support of its applications Signum submitted the requisite reports, including a Retail Market Demand and Impact Study. No staff report has been presented to City Council on the Signum applications and no public meetings have been held. In November 2002 Signum appealed the City's refusal to make a decision on its applications to the Board. In addition, Signum appealed OPA 111, which introduced new commercial policies into the City's Official Plan, to the Board, for, inter alia, its failure to include Signum lands in a Major Shopping Node. Following several hearings, OPA 111 has been substantially approved by the Board except as it applies to the Signum lands. 7 In April 2004 Signum filed a Notice of Appeal of OPA 126 and the By-laws. The Notice of Appeal (Ex 1a, TAB U) sets out Signum's grounds of appeal. In summary, Signum takes the position that OPA 126 "violates the very foundation of the City of Peterborough's commercial structure"; the proposed expansion and relocation of Wal-Mart is "completely at odds with the City's Commercial Structure"; and Signum's proposed Gateway Centre would be "a much more appropriate location for the addition of further retail opportunities in the City of Peterborough". Wal-Mart's Motion to Dismiss: 8 Pursuant to subsections 17(45) and 34(25) of the Act, the Board may dismiss all or part of an appeal, without holding a hearing, if, (a) it is of the opinion that, (i) (ii) (iii) the reasons set out in the notice of appeal do not disclose any apparent land use planning ground upon which the plan or part of the plan that is the subject of the appeal could be approved or refused by the Board, the appeal is not made in good faith or is frivolous or vexatious, or the appeal is made only for the purpose of delay; (b) (c) (d) (e) the appellant did not make oral submissions at a public meeting or did not make written submissions to the council before the plan was adopted and, in the opinion of the Board, the appellant does not provide a reasonable explanation for having failed to make a submission; the appellant has not provided written reasons with respect to an appeal under subsection (24) or (36); the appellant has not paid the fee prescribed under the Ontario Municipal Board Act; or the appellant has not responded to a request by the Municipal Board for
4 Page 4 further information within the time specified by the Board. 9 Counsel for Wal-Mart, in both written and oral submissions argued that the Signum appeals should be dismissed as the reasons for appeal set out in the Notice of Appeal do not disclose any apparent land use planning grounds upon which the proposal that is the subject of the appeal could be refused by the Board; the appeal is made only for the purpose of delay; and the appellant did not make oral submissions at a public meeting or did not make written submissions to the council before the plan was adopted, and in the opinion of the Board, the appellant did not provide a reasonable explanation for having failed to make a submission. 10 Counsel for both Wal-Mart and Signum cited a number of decisions of the Board which have considered in some detail the "test" for dismissal without a hearing as set out in subsections 17(45) and 34(25) of the Act. Counsel for Wal-Mart focused on the principals enunciated in East Beach Community Association v. Toronto (City), [1996] O.M.B.D. No and Orangeville (Town) Official Plan Amendment No. 86, Decision No. 1289, Dated July 30, In the East Beach case Mr. Lee, writing for the Board, found that in considering a motion to dismiss "the Board is entitled to examine the reasons stated to see whether they constitute genuine, legitimate and authentic planning reasons... the Board is to seek out whether there is authenticity in the reasons stated, whether there are issues that should affect a decision in a hearing and whether the issues are worthy of the adjudicative process" In the Orangeville OP A 86 case, Mr. Boxma, writing for the Board less than one month ago, cited the East Beach case and again found that when considering a motion to dismiss without a hearing, the Board will inquire into the authenticity of the reasons stated, whether there are issues that would affect a decision in a hearing and whether they constitute genuine, legitimate and authentic planning reasons. 12 Counsel for Signum cites, what this panel of the Board sees, as a different line of cases. In Simmonds v. Etobicoke (City), [1996] O.M.B.D. No. 206 Mr. Krushelnicki, writing for the Board found that to allow an appeal to continue the "Board must simply be satisfied that the grounds for upon which the appeal is made are within the realm of land use planning concerns". In Re. Town of Caledon Zoning By-law (1998), 36 O.M.B.R. 206 Mrs. Eger, writing for the Board, said that the test on a motion for dismissal is whether there is a "triable issue". Based on this line of case, Counsel for Signum submits that the matter before this panel of the Board is straightforward; there are planning issues in the Wal-Mart matter like the redesignation of land from low-density residential to commercial, a change in the commercial inventory of lands in the City and a change in designation of land that would allow for the development of a new department store. As these are triable land use planning issues, the appeals should be permitted to go forward. 13 The Board disagrees. The Signum applications are under appeal before the Board. 14 Based on the affidavit evidence submitted by Wal-Mart the Board finds that OPA 126 and By-laws and are consistent with the City's policies. The Official Plan sets out a
5 Page 5 multi-nodal retail commercial structure (Attachment 1), which reflects the Wal-Mart site, adjacent to the designated Portage Node and the proposed Signum site in the southwest part sector of the City, which is independent of a Shopping Node designation. 15 The Board finds that the proposal before it represents an incremental expansion of the designated Portage Node and that it reinforces the City's planned commercial structure. 16 The Board finds that the addition of a new node as proposed by Signum would require a total review of the City's commercial policies separate and distinct from the proposal before it. 17 The Board having reviewed the motion materials, the affidavits and considered the argument of Counsel for the parties, grants the motion and dismisses the appeal under subsection 17(45)(a)(i) and (iii) and subsection 34(25)(a)(i)(iii) and ((a).1). 18 The motion for costs will be argued at the Board's Chambers, 655 Bay Street, Toronto at a future date. 19 So Orders the Board. M. HUBBARD, Chair S.B. CAMPBELL, Vice-Chair qp/e/qlcct
The Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know
The Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know Dismissal Without a Hearing by: Dennis H. Wood and Sharmini Mahadevan June 2006 Municipal, Planning and Development Law 65 Queen Street
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: November 10, 2017 CASE NO(S).: PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Subject:
More informationApr. 21, 2009 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: Apr. 21, 2009 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF subsection 53(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant: Applicant:
More informationIndexed as: Ontario (Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region Number 13) v. Downtown Oshawa Property Owners' Assn.
Page 1 Indexed as: Ontario (Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region Number 13) v. Downtown Oshawa Property Owners' Assn. The Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region Number 13 and The Corporation of the
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: Nov. 18, 2011 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario Region of Peel Failure of the Minister of the Municipal Affairs and Housing to announce a decision respecting
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: May 12, 2010 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario PL080248 Orlando Corporation, Maple Lodge Farms Limited, The May Family and related Corporations, Brampton
More informationALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD. Decision
Appeal Nos. 01-113 and 01-115-D ALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD Decision Date of Decision June 15, 2002 IN THE MATTER OF sections 91, 92, and 95 of the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act,
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: December 15, 2017 CASE NO(S).: PL150686 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990,
More informationALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD. Decision
1 Appeal Nos. 00-029 and 00-060-D ALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD Decision Date of Decision January 9, 2001 IN THE MATTER OF Sections 84, 85, 87 and 92.1 of the Environmental Protection and Enhancement
More information0319 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: Feb.12, 2004 DECISION/ORDER NO: 0319 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario PL020711 The City of Toronto has applied to the Ontario Municipal Board under Section
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: December 22, 2011 PL110189 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF subsection 17(40) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
More informationCase Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada)
Page 1 Case Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada) Between The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Applicant (Appellant in Appeal), and AXA Insurance (Canada), Respondent (Respondent
More informationOntario Municipal Board
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario CORRECTION NOTICE OMB CASE NO(S).: PL170058 DECISION ISSUE DATE: October 20, 2017 CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2018
More informationMarch 18, 2010 PL Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: March 18, 2010 PL080959 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended Appellants:
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: December 15, 2017 CASE NO(S).: MM160053 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 11(5) of the Aggregate Resources Act,
More informationTRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS
LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Date:
More informationREASONS AND DECISION
Ontario Commission des 22nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD SPACAN MANUFACTURING LTD. ("Spacan") -and- KCT CONSTRUCTION LTD. ("KCT") (jointly the "Employers") -and-
BCLRB No. B318/99 (Leave for Reconsideration of BCLRB Nos. B357/98 and B358/98) BRITISH COLUMBIA LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD SPACAN MANUFACTURING LTD. ("Spacan") -and- KCT CONSTRUCTION LTD. ("KCT") (jointly
More informationSmart Growth for Our Communities Act Highlights of Changes to the Planning Act
Smart Growth for Our Communities Act 2015 S t r o n g C o m m u n i t i e s A B e t t e r L a n d U s e S y s t e m Highlights of Changes to the Planning Act Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015
More informationSIMPSONS-SEARS LIMITED ASSESSMENT AREA OF SURREY/WHITE ROCK. Supreme Court of British Columbia (A792827)
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for PAAB Decisions SC
More informationNOTICE OF DECISION of the MISSISAUGA APPEAL TRIBUNAL established pursuant to section 23.5 of the Municipal Act 2001
NOTICE OF DECISION of the MISSISAUGA APPEAL TRIBUNAL established pursuant to section 23.5 of the Municipal Act 2001 IN THE MATTER OF a Notice of Appeal, dated January 4, 2010 to the Mississauga Appeal
More informationOntario Ltd. (c.o.b. Castle Auto Collision & Mechanical Service) v. Certas Insurance, [2016] O.J. No. 264
1218897 Ontario Ltd. (c.o.b. Castle Auto Collision & Mechanical Service) v. Certas Insurance, [2016] O.J. No. Ontario Judgments [2016] O.J. No. 2016 ONSC 354 Ontario Superior Court of Justice Divisional
More informationChair David Shiner and members of the Planning and Growth Management Committee City of Toronto 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2
PG16.1.3 November 15, 2016 Chair David Shiner and members of the Planning and Growth Management Committee City of Toronto 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Dear Chair Shiner and members of the
More informationPUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Draft Local Official Plan Amendment Coleraine West Employment Area and Secondary Plan File: POPA 14-03 July 9, 2014 7:00 p.m. Caledon Council Chambers Purpose of Presentation
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: March 16, 2016 CASE NO(S).: PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(40) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13,
More informationREASONS AND DECISION (Subsections 127(1) and 127(10) of the Securities Act, RSO 1990, c S.5)
Ontario Securities Commission Commission des valeurs mobilières de l Ontario 22nd Floor 20 Queen Street West Toronto ON M5H 3S8 22e étage 20, rue queen oust Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Citation: Re AAOption et
More informationTRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS
LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Date:
More informationPROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER Section 53, subsection 53(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")
Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Blvd, Suite 211 Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Fax: 416-696-4307 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND ORDER Decision
More informationEASTERN NEWFOUNDLAND REGIONAL APPEAL BOARD URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING ACT, 2000 APPEAL. BETWEEN Darrell Percy Appellants
EASTERN NEWFOUNDLAND REGIONAL APPEAL BOARD URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING ACT, 2000 APPEAL BETWEEN Darrell Percy Appellants AND Town of South River Respondent RESPECTING Refusal BOARD MEMBERS Michelle Downey
More informationIndexed as: Bayview Summit Development Ltd. v. Ontario (Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 14)
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Indexed as: Bayview Summit Development Ltd. v. Ontario (Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 14) Appeal pursuant to section 96 of the Ontario Municipal Board Act, R.S.O.
More informationORDER PO Appeal PA Peterborough Regional Health Centre. June 30, 2016
ORDER PO-3627 Appeal PA15-399 Peterborough Regional Health Centre June 30, 2016 Summary: The appellant, a journalist, sought records relating to the termination of the employment of several employees of
More informationBOMA BEST Application Fees
1. Introduction BOMA BEST Application Fees Application fees for participation in the BOMA BEST Program (Sustainable Building Single Building Stream and Portfolio Program Stream and Sustainable Workplaces)
More informationLabour Relations Board Saskatchewan. CITY OF NORTH BATTLEFORD, Applicant v. CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 287, Respondent
Labour Relations Board Saskatchewan CITY OF NORTH BATTLEFORD, Applicant v. CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 287, Respondent LRB File No. 054-01; May 22, 2003 Vice-Chairperson, James Seibel; Members:
More informationSUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD PARKLAND COUNTY. Notice of Decision of Subdivision and Development Appeal Board
INTRODUCTION SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD PARKLAND COUNTY Legislative Services, Parkland County Centre 53109A HWY 779 Parkland County, AB T7Z 1R1 Telephone: (780) 968-3234 Fax: (780) 968-8413
More informationCITY OF PISMO BEACH Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, December 9, 2014 DRAFT MINUTES. Chair White, Vice-Chair Hamrick, Jewell, Overland, Woodhouse.
CITY OF PISMO BEACH Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, December 9, 2014 DRAFT MINUTES Call to order: 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call: Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Staff present: Chair White, Vice-Chair
More informationPROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 45(12), subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")
Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Blvd, Suite 211 Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Fax: 416-696-4307 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND ORDER Decision
More informationNoteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT Panel: Tony Stevens Decision Date: June 14, 2006
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2006-02511 Panel: Tony Stevens Decision Date: June 14, 2006 Capital cost allowance Depreciation Self-employed worker Average earnings Revenue-generating equipment
More informationCase Name: Graham v. Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect
Page 1 Case Name: Graham v. Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect Appearances: Between: Malvia Graham, applicant, and Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect, insurer [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No.
More informationALL MAN LABOUR SERVICES CC JUDGMENT: [1] Appellant approached the court a quo for an order to compel respondent to pay
IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) Case No.: JA 12/2007 ALL MAN LABOUR SERVICES CC Appellant and THE SERVICES SECTOR EDUCATION & TRAINING AUTHORITY Respondent JUDGMENT: DAVIS
More informationEASTERN NEWFOUNDLAND REGIONAL APPEAL BOARD URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING ACT, 2000 APPEAL. BETWEEN Ger-Bar Holdings Limited Appellant
EASTERN NEWFOUNDLAND REGIONAL APPEAL BOARD URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING ACT, 2000 APPEAL BETWEEN Ger-Bar Holdings Limited Appellant AND Town of Holyrood Respondent RESPECTING Refusal BOARD MEMBERS Michelle
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
Court File No. CV-09-7966-000L ONTARIO IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
More informationCanadian Hydro Developers, Inc.
Decision 2005-070 Request for Review and Variance of Decision Contained in EUB Letter Dated April 14, 2003 Respecting the Price Payable for Power from the Belly River, St. Mary and Waterton Hydroelectric
More informationBOMA BEST Application Fees 2018
1. Introduction BOMA BEST Application Fees 2018 BOMA BEST Application fees are provided in this section. BOMA Canada reserves the right to make changes to the Application Fees without notice. BOMA Canada
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 52109 ) Under Contract No. N68711-91-C-9509 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:
More informationHemson Growth Forecast / Planning Assumptions for Growth Scenarios Tested
Hemson Growth Forecast / Planning Assumptions for Growth Scenarios Tested The overall method for the forecast is based on the approach and models used for the preparation of the forecasts in Schedule 3
More information6 Draft 2018 Development Charge Background Study and Proposed Draft Bylaw Amendment
Clause 6 in Report No. 3 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on February 15, 2018. 6 Draft 2018 Development
More informationRight to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work); In the course of employment (reasonably incidental activity test).
SUMMARY 766/91 DECISION NO. 766/91 Foley v. Bondy PANEL: B. Cook; Lebert; Preston DATE: 13/03/92 Right to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work); In the course of employment (reasonably
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: February 23, 2016 CASE NO(S).: PL140495 PL141165 PL141235 PL141244 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Government Business Services Group, LLC ) ASBCA No. 53920 ) Under Contract No. F49642-00-D-5003 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Thomas R. Buresh,
More informationAN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL. AN tacht LUACHÁLA, 1988 VALUATION ACT, and. Commissioner of Valuation
Appeal No. VA94/1/043 AN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL AN tacht LUACHÁLA, 1988 VALUATION ACT, 1988 John Ball & Son Limited APPELLANT and Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT RE: Licensed Shop at Map
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
Court File No. C41105 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO B E T W E E N : ETHEL AHENAKEW, ALBERT BELLEMARE, C. HANSON DOWELL, MARIE GATLEY, JEAN GLOVER, HEWARD GRAFFTEY, AIRACA HAVER, LELANND HAVER, ROBERT HESS,
More informationAn Appeal from a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. B - to Refuse Registration
Licence Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d'appel en matière de permis DATE: 2017-06-08 FILE: 10602/MVDA CASE NAME: 10602 v. Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act 2002 An Appeal from a Notice of Proposal by the
More informationNumber 63 of Planning and Development (Amendment) Act 2015
Number 63 of 2015 Planning and Development (Amendment) Act 2015 Number 63 of 2015 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENT) ACT 2015 Section 1. Definition CONTENTS 2. Amendment of section 28 (Ministerial guidelines)
More informationReimbursement of Employer Overpayment from a Continuing Pension Plan
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario SECTION: Reimbursement of Employer Overpayment from a Continuing Pension Plan INDEX NO.: R350-103 TITLE: APPROVED
More informationCOUNCIL ORDER No
SAFETY CODES COUNCIL #1000, 10665 Jasper Avenue N.W., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5J 389 Tel: 780-413-0099 I 1-888-413-0099 Fax: 780-424-5134 I 1-888-424-5134 www.safetycodes.ab.ca COUNCIL ORDER No. 0015428
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Doiron v. Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission 2011 PECA 9 Date: 20110603 Docket: S1-CA-1205 Registry: Charlottetown
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) HAM Investments, LLC ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. DAKF23-99-C-0347 )
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) HAM Investments, LLC ) ASBCA No. 55070 ) Under Contract No. DAKF23-99-C-0347 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Mr.
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 DECISION NO. 2010-EMA-007(a) In the matter of an appeal under section
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theodore R. Robinson, : Petitioner : : v. : : State Employees' Retirement Board, : No. 1136 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: October 31, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationPatrick D. Easterling, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2008 MSPB 214 Docket No. AT-0752-08-0292-I-1 Patrick D. Easterling, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency. September 19, 2008 John R.
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Creating Solutions for Our Future John Hutchings District One Gary Edwards District Two Bud Blake District Three HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY In
More informationELECTRICAL SAFETY AUTHORITY REVIEW PANEL. DIRECTOR, ONTARIO ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE (the Respondent ) - and
ELECTRICAL SAFETY AUTHORITY REVIEW PANEL B E T W E E N: DIRECTOR, ONTARIO ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE (the Respondent ) - and MDS GENERAL CONTRACTING, A DIVISION OF 1725650 ONTARIO INC. (the Appellant ) DECISION
More informationAPPLICATION TO REMOVE PART LOT CONTROL MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized Municipality of Clarington, and circulated agency representatives to inspect the subject lands or premises, and to carry out any inspections,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE MCMASTER UNIVERSITY. - and -
Court File No.01-CV-216289 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: MCMASTER UNIVERSITY Applicant - and - A. LESLIE ROBB and JOHN P. EVANS, on their own behalf and on behalf of all the members,
More informationCommunity Care and Assisted Living Appeal Board
Community Care and Assisted Living Appeal Board Fourth Floor, 747 Fort Street Victoria BC V8W 3E9 Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria
More informationCITATION: Tsalikis v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2018 ONSC 1581 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 231/17 DATE: ONTARIO
CITATION: Tsalikis v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2018 ONSC 1581 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 231/17 DATE: 2018 03 06 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT MARROCCO A.C.J.S.C., THORBURN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. Case No Honorable Patrick J. Duggan FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE,
Case 2:10-cv-11345-PJD-MJH Document 12 Filed 07/07/10 Page 1 of 7 ANTHONY O. WILSON, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Case No. 10-11345 Honorable
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 Website:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2017] NZHC 1340
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2016-404-2289 [2017] NZHC 1340 BETWEEN AND KIWI PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED AND KIWI PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Hearing:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No. CI
[Cite as Ross v. Toledo, 2009-Ohio-1475.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Richard Ross Appellant Court of Appeals No. L-08-1151 Trial Court No. CI06-1816 v. City of
More informationMarket and Financial Inputs to Neighbourhood Centres Policy
Appendix E of PB-01-17 Market and Financial Inputs to Neighbourhood Centres Policy November 2016 Prepared for: City of Burlington By: Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Background... 1 1.2 Approach...
More informationSaskatchewan Municipal Board Assessment Appeals Committee
Saskatchewan Municipal Board Assessment Appeals Committee Appeal: 0008/2005 RESPONDENT: City of Regina In the matter of an appeal to the Assessment Appeals Committee, Saskatchewan Municipal Board, by:
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia V8W 3E9 Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria British
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CITATION: Volpe v. Co-operators General Insurance Company, 2017 ONSC 261 COURT FILE NO.: 13-42024 DATE: 2017-01-13 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: Vicky Volpe A. Rudder, for the Plaintiff/Respondent
More informationVision: The City of Greater Sudbury is a growing, world-class community bringing talent, technology and a great northern lifestyle together.
Vision: The City of Greater Sudbury is a growing, world-class community bringing talent, technology and a great northern lifestyle together. Agenda Hearing Committee meeting to be held Wednesday, June
More informationAugust 20, 2010 File: /EMB # MYLES MATERI v BC EGG MARKETING BOARD - SUMMARY DISMISSAL DECISION
File: 44200-50/EMB #10-10 DELIVERED BY E-MAIL & FAX Myles Materi Robert Hrabinsky Macaulay McColl RE: MYLES MATERI v BC EGG MARKETING BOARD - SUMMARY DISMISSAL DECISION Introduction On June 24, 2010, the
More informationBYLAW NUMBER 50M2011
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION BYLAW NUMBER 50M2011 BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO CONTINUE THE LICENCE AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS APPEAL BOARD * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Amended
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING July 19, 2017 Agenda Item C.3
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING July 19, 2017 Agenda Item C.3 REQUEST: A request for two variances to Cocoa Beach Land Development Code Section 5-05.D to allow two wall
More informationMOTION WITHOUT NOTICE. According to Chapter 27, Council Procedures:
M99 MOTION WITHOUT NOTICE OMB Hearing - 79 Galbraith Avenue Moved by: Seconded by: Councillor Davis Councillor Bussin SUMMARY: The owners of 79 Galbraith applied for and received a severance for this property
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board APPEAL NO. 96/20 - WILDLIFE In the matter of an appeal under section 103 of the Wildlife Act, S.B.C. 1982, c.57. BETWEEN: Terry Shendruk APPELLANT AND: Deputy Director of Wildlife
More informationmg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11
Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al. Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Chapter 11 Debtors. ----------------------------------------X
More informationIndexed as: Rano v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Between: Teresa Rano, applicant, and Commercial Union Assurance Company, insurer
Page 1 Indexed as: Rano v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Between: Teresa Rano, applicant, and Commercial Union Assurance Company, insurer [1999] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 134 File No. FSCO A97-001056 Ontario Financial
More informationIndexed as: BCSSAB 6(1)2013. IN THE MATTER OF THE SAFETY STANDARDS ACT SBS 2003, Chapter 39
Date Issued: November 14, 2013 File: SSAB 6-2013 Indexed as: BCSSAB 6(1)2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE SAFETY STANDARDS ACT SBS 2003, Chapter 39 AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal to the British Columbia Safety
More informationINTHE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG G4S CASH SOLUTIONS SA (PTY) LTD THE ROAD FREIGHT AND LOGISTICS INDUSTRY
INTHE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable Case no: JA51/15 In the matter between:- G4S CASH SOLUTIONS SA (PTY) LTD Appellant And MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA (MTWU)
More informationAn Overview of the Expropriation Process
An Overview of the Expropriation Process Steps of Expropriation Process - Frank Sperduti Introduction An expropriation in Ontario is defined as the taking of land without consent of the owner by an expropriating
More informationExaminations for discovery Income Tax Act. Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act. Consideration on application. Mandatory examination
1 Examinations for discovery Income Tax Act Examinations for discovery Excise Tax Act Consideration on application Mandatory examination LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS RELATED TO IMPROVING THE CASELOAD MANAGEMENT
More informationan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 22 February 2017 Site visit made on 22 February 2017 by Jameson Bridgwater PGDipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
More informationIN THE MATTER OF TCM INVESTMENTS LTD. carrying on business as OPTIONRALLY, LFG INVESTMENTS LTD., AD PARTNERS SOLUTIONS LTD. and INTERCAPITAL SM LTD.
Ontario Securities Commission Commission des valeurs mobilières de l Ontario 22nd Floor 20 Queen Street West Toronto ON M5H 3S8 22e étage 20, rue queen oust Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Citation: TCM Investments
More informationJUDGMENT. Meadows and others (Appellants) v The Attorney General and another (Respondents) (Jamaica)
Michaelmas Term [2017] UKPC 29 Privy Council Appeal No 0036 of 2016 JUDGMENT Meadows and others (Appellants) v The Attorney General and another (Respondents) (Jamaica) From the Court of Appeal of Jamaica
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ALBERTA APPEALS BOARD. Dems on. Preliminary. Appeal No : _ ID1. Properties
ALBERTA APPEALS BOARD ENVIRONMENTAL THE MATTER OF sections 91, 92, and 95 of the IN Protection and Enhancement Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. Environmental THE MATTER OF an appeal filed by Alberta Foothills IN Ltd.
More informationCHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO (THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO (THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF: Allegations against JOE CLEMENT
More informationALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Decision
Appeal No. 05-020-D ALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Decision Date of Decision January 18, 2006 IN THE MATTER OF sections 91, 92 and 95 of the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, R.S.A. 2000,
More informationDECISION ON EXPENSES
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: THOMAS WALDOCK Applicant and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON EXPENSES
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 565/09R
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 565/09R BEFORE: A. T. Patterson: Vice-Chair HEARING: March 5, 2010 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: March 9, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2010
More informationSubpart B Ex Parte Appeals. in both. Other parallel citations are discouraged.
PATENT RULES 41.30 41.10 Correspondence addresses. Except as the Board may otherwise direct, (a) Appeals. Correspondence in an application or a patent involved in an appeal (subparts B and C of this part)
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: February 22, 2008 DC070001 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario 1230374 Ontario Ltd. and Urbandale Corporation have appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board
More informationBusiness Plan: Land Use Planning
Business Plan: Land Use Planning How does this service contribute to the results identified in the City of London Strategic Plan? A Green and Growing City A Sustainable Infrastructure Land use planning
More informationPUBLIC MEETING THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL MINUTES. June 14,2012
PUBLIC MEETING THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL MINUTES PURPOSE: To hold a public meeting pursuant to Section 12 of the Development Charges Act, 7997, to inform the public and to obtain their input with
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 654/12
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 654/12 BEFORE: B. Doherty: Vice-Chair HEARING: April 5, 2012 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: May 1, 2012 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2012 ONWSIAT 965
More informationRe Jones. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Jones The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Michael
More information