proposed IRS adjustment on the taxpayer's income tax return.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "proposed IRS adjustment on the taxpayer's income tax return."

Transcription

1 TRUE/FALSE. Write 'T' if the statement is true and 'F' if the statement is false. 1) Corporations are required to file a tax return annually regardless of their taxable income. 2) The tax return filing requirements for individual taxpayers only depend on the taxpayer's filing status. 3) If a taxpayer is due a refund, she does not have to file a tax return. 4) If April 15 th falls on a Saturday, the due date for individual tax returns will be on Monday, April 17 th. 5) If an individual taxpayer is unable to file a tax return by its original due date, the taxpayer can request an automatic 9-month extension to file the return. 6) An extension to file a tax return does not extend the due date for tax payments. 7) The statute of limitations for IRS assessment generally ends four years after the date a tax return is filed. 8) For fraudulent tax returns, the statute of limitations for IRS assessment is ten years. 9) The IRS DIF system checks each tax return for mathematical mistakes and errors. 10) Joel reported a high amount of charitable contributions as a deduction on his individual tax return relative to taxpayers with similar income levels. The information matching program is the IRS program most likely to identify Joel's tax return for audit. 11) Office examinations are the most common type of IRS audit. 12) The three basic types of IRS examinations are computer exams, office exams, and business exams. 13) The "30-day" letter gives the taxpayer the opportunity to request an appeals conference or agree to a proposed IRS adjustment on the taxpayer's income tax return. 1

2 14) The "90-day" letter gives the taxpayer the opportunity to pay a proposed IRS tax adjustment or file a petition in the U.S. District Court to contest the adjustment and hear the case. 15) If a taxpayer has little cash and a very technical tax case that she feels very strongly that the tax rules are "on her side," she should prefer to have her case tried in the U.S. Tax Court. 16) In researching a tax issue, Eric finds that the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit previously has ruled in favor of his tax position, whereas the 11 th Circuit (Eric's circuit) previously has ruled against his tax position. If Eric is contemplating litigating his tax position with the IRS, he should prefer to have his case first tried by the U.S. Tax Court. 17) If a taxpayer loses a case at the Circuit Court level, he is granted an automatic appeal hearing with the Supreme Court. 18) Secondary authorities are official sources of the tax law with a lesser "weight" than primary authorities. 19) Revenue rulings and revenue procedures are examples of primary authorities. 20) The Internal Revenue Code and tax treaties are examples of statutory authorities. 21) Because the U.S. District Court hears a broader set of cases, decisions by the U.S. District Court may be considered to have more authoritative weight than the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. 22) Temporary Regulations have more authoritative weight than revenue rulings. 23) Proposed and Temporary Regulations have the same authoritative weight. 24) An acquiescence indicates that the IRS lost a court case and that it has decided to follow the court's ruling in the future. 25) The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is the name of the current income tax code of the United States of America. 2

3 26) As required by the Constitution, all tax bills are supposed to originate in the House of Representatives. 27) The Senate Ways and Means Committee is in charge of drafting tax bills in the U.S. Senate. 28) Closed facts are especially conducive to tax planning. 29) Of the two basic types of tax services, beginning tax researchers often prefer topical tax services. 30) In researching a question of fact, the researcher should focus her efforts on identifying authorities with fact patterns similar to her client's facts. 31) Under the Statement on Standards for Tax Services, a CPA may recommend a tax return position if the position is frivolous and the position is not disclosed on the tax return. 32) In general, a CPA will satisfy his professional responsibilities under the Statement on Standards for Tax Services when recommending a tax return position if he complies with the standards imposed by the applicable tax authority. 33) Under the tax law, taxpayers may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties for underpaying their tax liability (e.g., due to fraud). 34) A taxpayer can avoid an underpayment penalty if there is substantial authority that supports her tax return position. 35) If the IRS assesses additional tax on a tax return upon audit, a taxpayer may be subject to interest and penalties on the underpayment. 3

4 MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 36) Which of the following is not a factor that determines whether a taxpayer is required to file a tax return? A) Filing status. B) Taxpayer's employment. C) Taxpayer's gross income. D) Taxpayer's age. Answer: B 37) If Paula requests an extension to file her individual tax return, the latest she could file her return without a failure-to-file penalty is: A) August 15 th. B) November 15 th. C) September 15 th. D) October 15 th. Answer: D 38) If Lindley requests an extension to file her individual tax return, the latest she could pay her tax due without penalty is: A) October 15 th. B) November 15 th. C) August 15 th. D) April 15 th. Answer: D 39) Corporations are required to file a tax return only if their taxable income is greater than: A) $1,000. B) $0. C) $600. D) $750. Corporations are always required to file a tax return. Answer: E 40) This year April 15 th falls on a Saturday. Individual tax returns will be due on: A) April 16 th. B) April 15 th. C) April 14 th. D) April 17 th. Answer: D 4

5 41) Dominic earned $1,500 this year, and his employer withheld $200 of federal income tax from his salary. Assuming that Dominic is single, 30 years old, and will have zero tax liability this year, he: A) is not required to file a tax return and should not file a return. B) is required to file a tax return. C) is required to file a tax return but should not file because he owes no tax. D) is not required to file a tax return but should file a return anyway. Answer: D 42) Greg earned $21,500 this year and had $1,500 of federal income taxes withheld from his salary. Assuming that Greg is single, 25 years old, and will have a total tax liability of $1,000 (and thus will receive a $500) refund, he: A) is required to file a tax return but should not file because he owes no tax. B) is not required to file a tax return and should not file a return. C) is not required to file a tax return but should file a return anyway. D) is required to file a tax return. Answer: D 43) Bill filed his 2017 tax return on March 15 th, The statute of limitations for IRS assessment on Bill's 2017 tax return should end: A) March 15 th, B) April 15 th, C) April 15 th, D) March 15 th, Answer: B 44) Henry filed his 2017 tax return on May 15 th, The statute of limitations for IRS assessment on Henry's 2017 tax return should end: A) May 15 th, B) April 15 th, C) April 15 th, D) May 15 th, Answer: D 5

6 45) Allen filed his 2017 tax return on May 15 th, 2018 and underreported his gross income by 30 percent. Assuming Allen's underreporting is not due to fraud, the statute of limitations for IRS assessment on Allen's 2017 tax return should end: A) April 15 th, B) May 15 th, C) April 15 th, D) May 15 th, Answer: E 46) Andy filed a fraudulent 2017 tax return on May 1, The statute of limitations for IRS assessment on Andy's 2017 tax return should end: A) May 1 st, B) April 15 th, C) April 15 th, D) May 1 st, Answer: E 47) Martin has never filed a 2017 tax return despite earning approximately $20,000 providing landscaping work in the community. In what tax year, will the statute of limitations expire for Martin's 2017 tax return? A) B) C) D) Answer: E 48) Which of the following is not a common method that the IRS uses to select returns for audit? A) Document perfection. B) DIF system. C) Tax Select system. D) Information matching. Answer: C 49) Leslie made a mathematical mistake in computing her tax liability. Which audit program will likely catch Leslie's mistake? A) Document perfection. B) DIF System. C) Mathematical correction. D) Information matching. Answer: A 6

7 50) Tyrone claimed a large amount of charitable contributions as a tax deduction relative to taxpayers with similar levels of income. If Tyrone's tax return is chosen for audit because of his large charitable contributions, which audit program likely identified Tyrone's tax return for audit? A) Information matching. B) DIF System. C) Deduction Detective. D) Document perfection. Answer: B 51) Ramon's tax return was randomly selected for audit. Which IRS program likely selected Ramon's return for audit? A) Information matching. B) National Research Program. C) DIF System. D) Document perfection. Answer: B 52) Which of the following audits is the most common and typically less comprehensive? A) Office. B) Random. C) Correspondence. D) Field. Answer: C 53) Which of the following audits is the least common, broadest in scope, and typically most complex? A) Targeted. B) Field. C) Correspondence. D) Office. Answer: B 54) Dan received a letter from the IRS that gave him the choice of (1) requesting a conference with an Appeals Officer or (2) agreeing to a proposed tax adjustment. Dan received the: A) 30-day letter. B) 90-day letter. C) Tax adjustment letter. D) Appeals letter. Answer: A 7

8 55) Basu received a letter from the IRS that gave him the choice of (1) paying a proposed deficiency or (2) filing a petition with the U.S. Tax Court. Basu received the: A) Appeals letter. B) 90-day letter. C) Tax adjustment letter. D) 30-day letter. Answer: B 56) Which of the following courts is the only court that provides for a jury trial? A) U.S. Court of Federal Claims. B) Tax Court. C) U.S. District Court. D) U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Answer: C 57) Lavonda discovered that the 5 th Circuit (where Lavonda resides) has recently issued a favorable opinion with respect to an issue that she is going to litigate with the IRS. Lavonda should choose which of the following trial courts to hear her case? A) Tax Court or the U.S. District Court. B) Tax Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. C) U.S. Court of Federal Claims only. D) Tax Court only. E) U.S. District Court only. Answer: A 58) Lavonda discovered that the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has recently issued a favorable opinion with respect to an issue that she is going to litigate with the IRS. Lavonda should choose which of the following trial courts to hear her case? A) Tax Court only. B) U.S. District Court only. C) U.S. Court of Federal Claims only. D) Tax Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. E) Tax Court or the U.S. District Court. Answer: C 8

9 59) Rowanda could not settle her tax dispute with the IRS at the appeals conference. If she wants to litigate the issue but does not have sufficient funds to pay the proposed tax deficiency, Rowanda should litigate in the: A) U.S. District Court. B) Tax Court. C) U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. D) U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Answer: B 60) Which of the following is not considered a primary authority? A) Revenue Ruling. B) Tax service. C) Tax Court case. D) Treasury Regulation. Answer: B 61) Which of the following is not considered a secondary authority? A) Text book. B) Tax article. C) Tax service. D) Private Letter Ruling. Answer: D 62) Which of the following has the highest authoritative weight? A) Private letter ruling. B) Text book. C) Revenue ruling. D) Tax service. E) Tax article. Answer: C 63) Which of the following has the highest authoritative weight? A) Revenue procedure. B) Private letter ruling. C) Revenue ruling. D) Action on decision. E) Legislative regulation. Answer: E 9

10 64) Josephine is considering taking a 6-month rotation in Paris for her job. Which type of authority may be especially helpful in determining the tax consequences of Josephine's job in Paris? A) Revenue procedure. B) Determination letter. C) Regulation. D) Tax treaty. E) Private letter ruling. Answer: D 65) Generally, code sections are arranged (grouped together): A) randomly. B) by topic. C) chronologically. D) by length. Answer: B 66) Which of the following has the lowest authoritative weight? A) Interpretative regulation. B) Legislative regulation. C) Private letter ruling. D) Revenue ruling. E) Revenue procedure. Answer: C 67) Which judicial doctrine means that a court will rule consistently with its previous rulings and the rulings of higher courts with appellate jurisdiction? A) Stare decisis. B) The Goldman rule. C) Judicial hierarchy. D) Judicial consistency. Answer: A 68) The regulation with the lowest authoritative weight is the: A) Procedural regulation. B) Interpretative regulation. C) Legislative regulation. D) Proposed regulation. Answer: D 10

11 69) Princess, who resides in the 2 nd Circuit, recently found a circuit court case that is favorable to her income tax research question. Which of the following circuits would she prefer to have issued the opinion? A) 2 nd Circuit. B) 1 st Circuit. C) Federal Circuit. D) 2 nd Circuit or the Federal Circuit. Answer: D 70) Jaime recently found a "favorable" trial level court opinion directly on point for her tax question. Which trial level court would she prefer to have issued the opinion? A) Circuit Court. B) Tax Court. C) Divorce Court. D) District Court. Answer: B 71) Which of the following committees typically initiates tax legislation? A) Senate Tax Committee. B) Joint Conference Committee. C) Senate Finance Committee. D) House Ways and Means Committee. Answer: D 72) Edie would like to better understand a new code section enacted four weeks ago. Which of the following authorities will help Edie understand the newly enacted code section? A) IRS revenue rulings. B) IRS regulations. C) U.S. Tax Court cases. D) Committee reports. Answer: D 73) If the President vetoes tax legislation, Congress: A) can override the President's veto with a 75 percent positive vote in the House and Senate. B) can override the President's veto with a 2/3 rd positive vote in the House and Senate. C) can override the President's veto with a 50 percent positive vote in the House and Senate. D) cannot override the President's veto. Answer: B 11

12 74) Jeremy has a new client. He has identified a research question that relates to a transaction that the client completed several months ago. This type of research question will primarily involve: A) closed facts. B) open facts. C) new facts. D) old facts. Answer: A 75) In a planning context, A) new facts are preferred to old facts. B) old facts are preferred to new facts. C) open facts are preferred to closed facts. D) closed facts are preferred to open facts. Answer: C 76) Which of the following types of tax services are arranged by code section? A) professional tax service. B) legal tax service. C) topical tax service. D) annotated tax service. Answer: D 77) Which of the following is not a common tool used in conducting tax research? A) Citator. B) Topical tax service. C) Keyword search. D) Annotated tax service. Answer: E 78) Which of the following is not a source of a tax practitioner's professional responsibilities? A) Circular 230. B) State Board of Accountancy statutes. C) Statements on Standards for Tax Services. D) AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Answer: E 12

13 79) According to Statement on Standards for Tax Services No. 1, a tax practitioner can recommend a tax return position: A) only if the position meets the "clear and convincing evidence" standard. B) if the position complies with the standards imposed by the applicable tax authority. C) if the position is frivolous and disclosed on the tax return. D) only if the position meets the "more likely than not" standard. Answer: B 80) Circular 230 was issued by: A) State Boards of Accountancy. B) IRS. C) American Bar Association. D) AICPA. Answer: B 81) Which of the following is a false statement? A taxpayer filing a fraudulent tax return: A) is potentially subject to criminal penalties. B) is potentially subject to fines and a prison sentence. C) is potentially subject to civil penalties. D) will have an unlimited statute of limitations for the fraudulent tax return. Answer: E 82) For which of the following tax violations is a civil penalty not imposed on taxpayers? A) Fraud. B) Failure to pay tax owed. C) Failure to make estimated tax payments. D) Failure to file a tax return. Answer: E 83) A taxpayer can avoid a substantial understatement of tax penalty: A) if the position has a reasonable basis and is not disclosed on the tax return. B) if the position is frivolous and disclosed on the tax return. C) if there is substantial authority to support the position. D) if the position has a realistic possibility of being sustained by the IRS or courts. Answer: C 13

14 84) A taxpayer can avoid a substantial understatement of tax penalty: A) if the position has a reasonable basis and is disclosed on the tax return. B) if the position is not frivolous and disclosed on the tax return. C) if the position has a realistic possibility of being sustained by the IRS or courts. D) if the position is frivolous and disclosed on the tax return. Answer: A 85) Which types of penalties are only imposed after normal due process including a trial? A) Civil penalties. B) Tax return. C) Criminal and civil penalties. D) Criminal penalties. Answer: D 86) A tax practitioner can avoid IRS penalty relating to a tax return position: A) if the position has a realistic possibility of being sustained by the IRS or courts. B) if the position has a reasonable basis and is not disclosed on the tax return. C) if the position is frivolous and disclosed on the tax return. D) if there is substantial authority to support the position. Answer: D 87) A tax practitioner can avoid IRS penalty relating to a tax return position: A) only if the position has a more likely than not chance of being sustained by the IRS or courts. B) if the position has a realistic possibility of being sustained by the IRS or courts. C) if the position has a reasonable basis and is disclosed on the tax return. D) if there is not substantial authority to support the position. Answer: C 14

15 ESSAY. Write your answer in the space provided or on a separate sheet of paper. 88) Tina has a very complex tax return and it looks like she will not be able to file her tax return by its due date. When is her tax return due? What are Tina's options for paying her tax due and filing her tax return this year? What are the consequences if Tina does not file or pay her tax timely? Be specific. Answer: Tina's tax return is due April 15 th. Tina may request an automatic 6-month extension to file her tax return (i.e., until October 15 th ). Extensions allow the taxpayer to delay filing a tax return but do not extend the due date for tax payments. If a taxpayer fails to pay the entire balance of tax owed by the original due date of the tax return, the IRS charges the taxpayer interest on the underpayment from the due date of the return until the taxpayer pays the tax. The interest rate charged depends on taxpayer type (e.g., individual vs. corporation) and varies quarterly with the federal short-term interest rate. The interest rate for tax underpayments for individuals equals the federal short-term rate plus three percentage points. Penalties are also imposed when a taxpayer fails to file a tax return. Also, there is no statute of limitations if Tina fails to file her return. 89) For the following taxpayers indicate whether the taxpayer should file a tax return and why. a. Robert earned $50,000 this year as a staff accountant. His estimated tax liability is $4,500, and he e receive a $500 tax refund. b. Amy earned $4,000 this year working part-time. She will have no federal tax liability and has not m federal tax payments. c. Ty earned $2,500 this summer and had $200 of federal taxes withheld from his paycheck. He will h federal tax liability this year. d. Startup Corporation had a $50,000 loss this year. e. The Walker Family Trust earned $500 of gross income this year. Answer: (a) Because his gross income exceeds the applicable gross income threshold, Robert is required to file a tax return. (b) Amy is not required to file a tax return because her income is below the applicable gross income threshold. (c) Ty is not required to file a tax return because his gross income is below the applicable gross income threshold. However, he should file a tax return to receive a refund of the $200 of taxes withheld. (d) Startup Corporation is required to file a tax return as all corporations are required to file an annual tax return regardless of their profitability. (e) Because the trust's income is below the applicable threshold, the Walker Family Trust is not required to file a tax return this year. 15

16 90) For the 2017 tax returns, indicate when the statute of limitation expires and why. a. Phoenix filed his tax return on February 28, b. Jill and Randy filed their tax return on August 16, c. Although required to file, Catherine chose not to file a tax return this year because she was expecti refund and could not pull together all the information needed to file the return. d. Jerry filed his tax return on May 22, 2018 but has accidentally underreported his taxable income by Answer: (a) April 15, The statute of limitations expires three years from the later of the original due date of the return or the date the return was filed. (b) August 16, The statute of limitations expires three years from the later of the original due date of the return or the date the return was filed. (c) Because Catherine failed to file a tax return, the statute of limitation will not lapse for her 2017 tax return. (d) May 22, Because Jerry underreported his gross income by 30%, the statute of limitations is extended to six years. 91) For the 2017 tax returns, indicate when the statute of limitation expires and why. a. Simon filed his tax return on April 10, b. Billy and Barbara filed their tax returns late on December 1, c. Pearson earns a living through various illegal activities. He filed his tax return on March 14, 2018 b report his illegal income on his tax return. d. Luther filed his tax return on July 17, 2018 but has accidentally underreported his taxable gross inc 20%. Answer: (a) April 15, The statute of limitations expires three years from the later of the original due date of the return or the date the return was filed. (b) December 1, The statute of limitations expires three years from the later of the original due date of the return or the date the return was filed. (c) Because Pearson filed a fraudulent tax return, the statute of limitation will not lapse for his 2017 tax return. (d) July 17, Because Luther accidentally underreported his income by only 20%, the statute of limitations will expire three years from the date the return is filed (i.e., the statute of limitation is not extended to six years). 92) For the following tax returns, identify the method the IRS likely used to select the return for audit. a. Dan made a mistake in adding his income on his tax return. b. Juanita failed to report her salary from her 2 nd job on her tax return. c. Michael and Venita deducted a relatively large amount of travel expenses on their tax return for the business. The travel expense is large relative to other taxpayers in similar businesses with similar lev income. d. Paul and Melissa recently went through a very nasty divorce. One of the issues was Paul's less than forthright accounting of his income in determining the appropriate level of alimony. Answer: (a) Document perfection (b) Information matching (c) DIF system (d) Spousal tip. 16

17 93) For the following tax returns, identify which of the three audit types will most likely be utilized. a. The IRS selected Don's return for audit because of his high itemized deductions. The IRS would lik documentation of these deductions. b. Large Public Corporation is a very large publicly traded corporation. It is involved in many comple transactions that have significant tax ramifications. c. George and Barbara operate a small business out of their home. The IRS has identified a couple of that may relate to their business. d. The IRS selected Bill and Hillary's tax return for review because of some of their investment sales. would like a better understanding of the transactions and parties involved. Answer: (a) Correspondence exam (b) Field exam (c) Office exam (d) Correspondence exam and possibly an office exam. 94) The IRS has recently completed its audit of Lorene's corporation. As a tax novice, she has very little understanding regarding the audit process and what happens next. Describe the post-audit process for Lorene and identify her options. Answer: After the examination, the IRS agent provides a list of proposed adjustments (if any) to the taxpayer for review. If the taxpayer agrees to the proposed changes, the taxpayer signs an agreement form (Form 870) and pays the additional tax owed (or receives the proposed refund). If the taxpayer disputes the proposed changes, the taxpayer will receive a "30-day letter" which instructs the taxpayer that he or she has 30 days to either (1) request a conference with an Appeals Officer, who is independent and resides in a separate IRS division from the examining agent or (2) agree to the proposed adjustment. An appeals officer would consider the merits of the unresolved issues as well as the "hazards of litigation" - that is, the probability that the IRS will lose if the case is brought to court and the resulting costs of a taxpayer-favorable ruling. If the taxpayer chooses the appeals conference and reaches an agreement with the IRS there, the taxpayer can then sign the Form 870. If the taxpayer and IRS still do not agree on the proposed adjustment at the appeals conference, or the taxpayer chooses not to request an appeals conference, the IRS will then send the taxpayer a "90-day letter." The 90-day letter (also known as a statutory notice of deficiency) explains that the taxpayer has 90 days to either (1) pay the proposed deficiency or (2) file a petition in the U.S. Tax Court to hear the case. If the taxpayer would like to litigate the case but would prefer that the case be heard in the local U.S. District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the taxpayer must pay the tax deficiency first and then sue the IRS for refund in the court. 17

18 95) Mel recently received a 30-day letter from the IRS. Although his tax return being audited has several large issues (potential tax consequences of $70,000 $80,000), the IRS agent auditing his return only identified one item that will require a modest adjustment of $10,000. Mel feels strongly that the $10,000 adjustm would not hold up in court and was surprised that the IRS agent did not identify some of the other potential larger issues. What are Mel's choices with respect to the 30-day letter and what factors should influence his decisions? Answer: The "30-day letter" instructs the taxpayer that he or she has 30 days to either (1) request a conference with an Appeals Officer, who is independent and resides in a separate IRS division from the examining agent or (2) agree to the proposed adjustment. An appeals officer would consider the merits of the unresolved issues as well as the "hazards of litigation" - that is, the probability that the IRS will lose if the case is brought to court and the resulting costs of a taxpayer-favorable ruling. Thus, the appeals officer has a bit more latitude to settle cases than examining agents. Because the appeals division is independent, it may be possible for the taxpayer to receive a more favorable resolution as the appeals officer is less emotionally invested in the audit. On the downside, the appeals officer may raise new issues, and thus, increase the taxpayer's tax exposure. In addition, the longer the dispute continues without resolution, the more interest will accrue on the assessment. In Mel's case, the potential risk of the appeals officer raising additional questions probably outweighs the potential benefits of appeal. Thus, it may be better for him to forego the appeals conference and either agree to the proposed adjustment or litigate the case. 96) Kim has decided to litigate a tax issue with the IRS. Describe the trial level courts that Kim may use to litigate the case. Answer: There are three trial level courts that hear federal tax cases; The U.S. Tax Court, The U.S. District Court, and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The U.S. District Court is the only court that provides for a jury trial; the U.S. Tax Court is the only court that allows tax cases to be heard before the taxpayer pays the disputed liability and the only court with a small claims division (hearing claims involving disputed liabilities of $50,000 or less); the U.S. Tax Court judges are tax experts, whereas the U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Federal Claims judges are generalists. Both the U.S. Tax Court and local U.S. District Court cases appeal to the specific Circuit Court based on the taxpayer's residence. In contrast, all U.S. Court of Federal Claims cases appeal to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 18

19 97) For the following taxpayers, please recommend the most advantageous trial level court(s) to litigate a issue with the IRS. a. Joe is litigating a tax issue with the IRS that is considered a question of fact (i.e., the answers depe facts of the case). There is not a lot of authority on point for this case but Joe has a very appealing sto justify his position that is likely to be viewed sympathetically by his peers. b. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued an opinion that is very favorab issue that Jesse plans to litigate with the IRS. c. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued an opinion that is not favorable issue that Hank plans to litigate with the IRS. d. The 7 th Circuit (where Elizabeth resides) recently issued an opinion that is very favorable to the issue that Elizabeth plans to litigate with the IRS. Answer: (a) U.S. District Court because it is the only court that offers a jury trial. (b) The U.S. Court of Federal Claims because its appellate court is the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (c) The U.S. Tax Court or the U.S. District Court because they will not appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (d) The U.S. Tax Court or the U.S. District Court because they will appeal to the 7 th Circuit. 19

20 98) A client has recently learned of a proposed tax bill that would increase the tax rates on investment gains by 5 percent. The President does not support this increase. Please describe for your client the process by which new tax legislation is created and how the President's disapproval may influence the enactment of the bill. Answer: As required by the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Section 7), "All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives." The Senate may propose tax legislation, but the first to formally consider a bill will be the House, typically within its Ways and Means Committee. After the committee debates the proposed legislation and drafts a bill, the bill is sent to the House of Representatives for debate and ultimately a vote (either yea or nay without modification). If the bill is approved, it becomes an "Act" and is sent to the Senate, which refers the Act to the Senate Finance Committee. Not to be outdone by the House, the Senate Finance Committee typically amends the Act during its deliberations. After the revised Act passes the Senate Finance Committee, the Act is sent to the Senate for debate and vote. Unlike the process in the House of Representatives, Senators may modify the proposed legislation during their debate. If the Senate passes the Act, both the House and Senate versions of the legislation are sent to the Joint Conference Committee, which consists of members of the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee. During the Joint Conference Committee deliberations, committee members debate the two versions of the proposed legislation. Possible outcomes for any specific provision in the proposed legislation include adoption of the Senate version, House version, or some compromise version of the two acts. Likewise, it is possible that the Joint Conference Committee will simply choose to eliminate specific provisions from the proposed legislation or fail to reach a compromise on the proposed legislation, thereby terminating the legislation. After the Joint Conference Committee approves the Act, the revised legislation is sent to the House and Senate for vote. If approved by both the House and Senate, the Act is sent to the President for his or her signature. If the President signs the act, it becomes law and is incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (i.e., Title 26 of the United States Code, which contains all codified laws of the U.S.). If the President vetoes the legislation, Congress may override the veto with a 2/3 rd positive vote in both the House of Representatives and Senate. Given the President's disapproval of the proposed tax increase and supermajority required to override a Presidential veto, the legislation most likely will not be enacted. 20

21 99) Chris and Chuck were recently debating whether the Internal Revenue Code is "logical." Chris offers that she has briefly reviewed the Code and could hardly understand its organizational structure, if there is one. Please describe the basic organization of the code and how understanding its organization may be especially beneficial to the tax researcher. Answer: The Internal Revenue Code is segregated into subtitles, chapters, subchapters, parts, subparts, and sections. All existing and any new tax laws are placed in the Code within a specific subtitle, chapter, subchapter, part, subpart, and section of the Code. When referencing a tax law, the researcher generally refers to the law simply by its code section. Code sections are numbered from 1 to 9834, with gaps in the section numbers to allow new code sections to be ad the appropriate parts of the Code as needed. Each code section is further segregated into subsec paragraphs, subparagraphs, and clauses to allow more specific reference or citation. One must understand the organization of a code section (i.e., into subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, and clauses) to be able to cite the respective law correctly (e.g., IRC Sec. 162(b)(2)). Many provisions in the Code apply only to specific parts of the Code. If one does not understand what laws are encompassed in the chapter, it would be very difficult to interpret the code section and determine its applicability to a research question. Finally, the Code has been arranged such that, in general, similar code sections are grouped together. Understanding this organization allows the researcher to be much more efficient in locating relevant code sections. 21

22 100) Carey was researching a tax issue and located what appears to be a favorable IRS regulation. He knows that regulations serve different purposes and are issued in different forms. Which purpose and which form of regulation would provide Carey the most confidence that he has found an authority that carries a lot of weight for the long term? How could Carey check the status of this regulation? Answer: Regulations are the Treasury Department's official interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code and have the highest authoritative weight. Regulations are issued in three different forms: proposed, temporary, and final. Final regulations are regulations that have been issued in final form, and thus, until revoked, they represent the Treasury's interpretation of the Code. Temporary regulations, as the name suggests, have a limited life (three years for regulations issued after November 20, 1988). Nonetheless, during their "life," they carry the same authoritative weight as final regulations. Finally, proposed regulations are, as the name suggests, "proposed," and thus do not carry the same authoritative weight as temporary or final regulations. In addition to being issued in three different forms, regulations also serve three basic purposes: interpretative, procedural, and legislative. Most regulations are issued as interpretative or procedural regulations. As the names suggest, interpretative regulations represent the Treasury's interpretation of the Code. Procedural Regulations explain Treasury Department procedures as they relate to administering the Code. Legislative regulations, the rarest type, are issued when Congress specifically directs the Treasury Department to create regulations to address an issue in an area of law. In these instances, the Treasury is actually writing the law instead of interpreting the Code. Because Legislative Regulations actually represent tax law instead of an interpretation of tax law, Legislative Regulations generally have been viewed to have more authoritative weight than Interpretative and Procedural Regulations. However, in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. U.S., 131 S.Ct. 704 (2011), the Supreme Court held (subject to specific conditions) that all Treasury regu warrant deference. Checking the status of regulations is a bit complicated. Most tax services alert researchers if a regulation has not been updated for certain changes in the Code. If this is the case, the researche evaluate whether the changes in the Code make the regulation obsolete. 101) Campbell was researching a tax issue and found a favorable Tax Court opinion and an IRC Code Section that appears to answer the question. Is she finished with the research process? If so, why? If not, what must she do? Answer: Campbell is not finished. Once the tax researcher has identified relevant authorities, she must make sure that the authorities are still valid and up to date. For court cases, a citator can be used to review the history of the case to find out, for example, whether it was subsequently appealed and overturned or and to identify subsequent cases that cite the case. Favorable citations strengthen a case, while unfavorable citations weaken the case. Citators can also be used to check the status of revenue rulings, revenue procedures, and other IRS pronouncements. Checking the status of the code is fairly simple: just locate the current version. 22

23 102) Roddy was researching an issue and found a favorable Tax Court decision that addresses his issue. He also determined that there was a nonacquiescence for the case. Who issued the nonacquiescence? What is it? What does it mean and how would it affect Roddy's reliance on the court case? Answer: Except for Supreme Court cases, whenever the IRS loses, it may issue an acquiescence or nonacquiescence as guidance for how the IRS intends to respond to the loss. An acquiescence indicates that the IRS has decided to "follow" the court's adverse ruling in the future - i.e., the IRS will no longer litigate this issue. A nonacquiescence has the exact opposite implications. A nonacquiescence alerts taxpayers that the IRS plans to continue to litigate this issue. Roddy can still rely on the favorable Tax Court case but should alert his client that the IRS has stated very clearly that it does not agree with the Tax Court opinion and will continue to litigate this issue. 103) Raul was researching an issue and found two Tax Court decisions issued within 6 months of each other, one for a taxpayer residing in California and the other for a taxpayer residing in New York whose rulings were inconsistent. Raul knows that the federal tax law does not differ by state and the issue was exactly the same in both cases. Raul is confused because he thought that a basic judicial doctrine was that a court is supposed to rule consistently. Name and describe this judicial doctrine that requires judicial consistency and discuss why the Tax Court may have intentionally ruled inconsistently in this example. Answer: In rendering court decisions, all courts apply the judicial doctrine of stare decisis. This doctrine means that a court will rule consistently with (a) its previous rulings (i.e., unless, due to evolving interpretations of the tax law over time, they decide to overturn an earlier decision) and (b) the rulings of higher courts with appellate jurisdiction (i.e., the courts their cases are appealed to). The implication of stare decisis is that a Circuit Court will abide by Supreme Court rulings and its own rulings, whereas a trial level court will abide by Supreme Court rulings, its respective Circuit Court's rulings, and its own rulings. For example, a district court in California would follow 9 th Circuit and Supreme Court rulings as well as the court's ow rulings. The doctrine of stare decisis presents a special problem for the Tax Court because it appeals to different Circuits based on the taxpayer's residence. To implement the doctrine of stare decisis, the Tax Court applies the Golsen rule. The Golsen rule simply states that the Tax Court will abide by the Circuit Court's rulings that has appellate jurisdiction for a case. The implication of the Golsen rule is that the Tax Court may issue conflicting opinions in different Circuits and thus, most likely explains the differing Tax Court decisions that Raul located. 23

24 104) Rebecca is at a loss. A new tax law was recently passed, and she needs to get a better understanding of why the tax law was passed and the intent of the law from an official authority. Describe what authorities may be especially helpful to Rebecca and why she can't find many authorities that discuss the new law. Answer: The House Ways and Means Committee, Senate Finance Committee, and Joint Conference Committee each produce a committee report that explains the current tax law, proposed change in the law, and justification for the change. These committee reports are considered "statutory" sources of the tax law and may be very useful in interpreting tax law changes and understanding Congressional intent. This is especially important after new legislation has been enacted because, with the exception of the Code, there will be very little authority interpreting the new law (i.e., no judicial or administrative authorities because of the time it takes for the new law to be litigated or for the IRS to issue interpretative guidance - e.g., regulations, etc.). 105) Lakeisha, a 1 st year staff accountant, was researching a tax issue and found what appears to be the answer to her question in her introductory tax textbook that she bought three years ago. She is thrilled because she thought it would take much longer to find her answer. What type of authority is the textbook? What are other examples of this type of authorities? Can Lakeisha base her research conclusion on the textbook or similar authorities? Any suggestions for Lakeisha? Answer: There are two broad categories of tax authorities: primary authorities and secondary authorities. Primary authorities are "official" sources of the tax law generated by the legislative branch (i.e., statutory authority issued by Congress), judicial branch (i.e., rulings by the U.S. District Court, U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, or U.S. Supreme Court), or executive/administrative branch (i.e., IRS pronouncements). Secondary authorities are "unofficial" tax authorities that interpret and explain the primary authorities, such as tax research services, tax articles, newsletters, and textbooks. Secondary authorities may be very helpful in understanding a tax issue, but they hold little weight in a tax dispute (hence, the term "unofficial" tax authorities). Thus, tax advisors should always be careful to verify their understanding of tax law by examining primary authorities directly and never cite a secondary authority in a research memo. In Lakeisha's case, this is particularly important because her textbook is three years old. Thus, not only is the textbook not an "official" tax authority, it may also be out of date. 24

25 106) Kodak is a beginning tax researcher. He knows that the 1 st step of the research process is to get an understanding of the facts surrounding the transaction being researched. Describe the two basic types of facts, the sources of facts for a research project, and any advice that may help Kodak. Answer: There are two basic types of facts: open facts and closed facts. Open facts have not yet occurred, such as the facts associated with a proposed transaction. Closed facts have already occurred. The distinction between open and closed facts is important because unlike closed facts, open facts can be altered, and different facts may result in very different tax consequence Open facts allow the taxpayer to arrange a transaction to achieve the most advantageous outcom Thus, they are especially important in tax planning. There are several sources of facts for the typical research projects. Common sources include interviewing clients, speaking with third parties (e.g., attorneys, brokers), and reviewing client documents (contracts, prior tax returns, wills, trust documents, deeds, corporate minutes, etc.). When interviewing clients, you must remember that many clients are not tax experts. Thus, it is up to the tax researcher to ask the correct initial and follow-up questions to obtain all the relevant facts. Within a tax planning context, one should also consider non-tax factors, such as a client's personal values or objectives, as these often put constraints on tax planning strategies. 107) Caitlin is a tax manager for an accounting firm, and Duff is a first year staff accountant. Describe the differences in the manner in which Caitlin and Duff may identify research issues and in general how one may identify research questions. Answer: A tax researcher's ability to identify issues is largely a function of his or her type of tax expertise. A tax expert in a particular area will typically be able to identify quickly the specific tax issues that relate to transactions in that area. For example, an expert in corporate acquisitions would quickly identify the tax consequences and specific issues of alternative acquisition types. A novice, on the other hand, would likely identify broader issues first and the specific issues as he researched the relevant tax law. The best method to identify tax issues is to first get a good understanding of the client's facts. T combine your understanding of the facts with your knowledge of the tax law. For an expert in th particular area, the issues will be immediately evident. For a novice, the initial response to a set of facts may take the form of a series of general questions: (1) Is this item of expense deductible? (2) Is that item of income taxable? (3) In what year should the expense be deducted? (4) In what year should the item of income be taxed? etc. After you identify these types of general issues, your research will enable you to identify the more specific issues that ultimately determine the tax ramifications of the transaction being researched. 25

26 108) Lindy, a tax intern, is beginning her first tax research case for her employer. Her manager has given her a basic understanding of the facts and has identified the basic research question. Lindy is now ready to begin searching for relevant tax authorities. Describe the different types of research tools available to help a tax researcher locate relevant authority and identify which type may be especially useful for Lindy. Answer: Tax services aid the researcher in identifying relevant authorities. There are two basic types of tax services: Annotated tax services and topical tax services. Annotated tax services are arranged by code section - i.e., for each code section, an annotated service includes the code section, a listing of the code section history, copies of congressional committee reports that explain changes to the code section, a copy of all the regulations issued for the specific code section, the service's "unofficial" explanation of the code section, and brief summaries (called annotations) of relevant court cases, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, letter rulings, etc. that address issues specific to the code section. Two examples of annotated tax services are Commerce Clearing House's (CCH) Standard Federal Tax Reporter and RIA's United States Ta Reporter. Topical tax services are arranged by topic (e.g., taxable forms of income, tax-exempt income, tr business expenses, etc.). For each topic, the services identify tax issues that relate to each topic then explain and cite authorities relevant to the issue (code sections, regulations, court cases, revenue rulings, etc.). Beginning tax researchers (like Lindy) often prefer topical services, as they generally are easier to read. Some examples of topical federal tax services include BNA's Tax Management Portfolios, CCH's Tax Research Consultant, and RIA's Federal Tax Coordinator. 109) Hong, an introductory tax student, is beginning his first research project. He has a complete understanding of the relevant facts for his project and has identified the initial research questions. He is now ready to begin using a tax service to identify relevant authorities. What are some suggestions for him on how to use tax services to identify relevant authorities? Answer: A novice may conduct a keyword search in the service, use the tax service's topical index, or "browse" the tax service to identify the relevant portions. Some suggestions for identifying keywords: Try to describe the transaction in three to five words. An ideal keyword search typically includes (1) the relevant area of law and (2) a fact or two that describes the transaction Try to avoid keywords that are too broad (e.g., income, deduction, taxable, etc.) or that may be narrow. If keyword searching is not proving beneficial, check your spelling, make sure you are searchin correct database, rethink your keywords, use another research method, use another tax service, a last resort, take a break. While utilizing keyword searches or other research methods to identify potentially relevant area and tax authorities, you must constantly ask yourself whether you are indeed in the correct area Once the answer to this question is an authoritative "yes," you can delve deeper into the area of related authorities to answer the question. 26

Full file at

Full file at Chapter 02 Tax Compliance, the IRS and Tax Authorities True / False Questions 1. Corporations are required to file a tax return annually regardless of their taxable income. True False 2. The tax return

More information

Solutions Manual McGraw-Hill s Taxation, by Spilker et al. SOLUTIONS MANUAL

Solutions Manual McGraw-Hill s Taxation, by Spilker et al. SOLUTIONS MANUAL Solutions Manual McGraw-Hill s Taxation, by Spilker et al. Discussion Questions Chapter 2 Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities SOLUTIONS MANUAL 1. [LO 1] Name three factors that determine whether

More information

Chapter 02 - Working with the Tax Law

Chapter 02 - Working with the Tax Law 1. Rules of tax law do not include Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures. Rules of tax law do include Treasury Department pronouncements. 2. A tax professional need not worry about the relative weight

More information

CHAPTER 2: WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW

CHAPTER 2: WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW DOWNLOAD FULL TEST BANK FOR SOUTH WESTERN FEDERAL TAXATION 2015 INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAXES 38TH EDITION BY HOFFMAN AND SMITH Link download full: https://testbankservice.com/download/test-bank-for-south-western-federaltaxation-2015-individual-income-taxes-38th-edition-by-hoffman-and-smith/

More information

CHAPTER 28 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition

CHAPTER 28 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition CHAPTER 28 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition 1 Code Unchanged 1 2 Code Modified 2 3 Tax legislation Modified 3

More information

Prentice Halls Federal Taxation 2016 Comprehensive 29th Edition Pope TEST BANK

Prentice Halls Federal Taxation 2016 Comprehensive 29th Edition Pope TEST BANK Prentice Halls Federal Taxation 2016 Comprehensive 29th Edition Pope TEST BANK Full download at: https://testbankreal.com/download/prentice-halls-federal-taxation-2016- comprehensive-29th-edition-pope-test-bank/

More information

Taxation of Corporations and their Shareholders. Chapter 17. Tax Penalties. UNC Charlotte Master of Accountancy Program

Taxation of Corporations and their Shareholders. Chapter 17. Tax Penalties. UNC Charlotte Master of Accountancy Program Taxation of Corporations and their Shareholders Chapter 17 Tax Penalties UNC Charlotte Master of Accountancy Program April 27, 2015 UNC Charlotte MACC Program Chapter 17. Some Important Tax Penalties Page

More information

Chapter 01 Introduction to Taxation, the Income Tax Formula, and Form 1040EZ

Chapter 01 Introduction to Taxation, the Income Tax Formula, and Form 1040EZ Chapter 01 Introduction to Taxation, the Income Tax Formula, and Form 1040EZ True / False Questions 1. The U.S. individual income tax system is an example of a progressive tax rate structure. 2. A proportional

More information

From time to time, an owner of our firm who is not licensed as a CPA in California may participate in providing services to you.

From time to time, an owner of our firm who is not licensed as a CPA in California may participate in providing services to you. SCOTT RUBENSTEIN, E.A. ESTHER EISENSTEIN, CPA 8350 MELROSE AVE. 2 ND Floor LOS ANGELES, CA 90069 L. A. TAX SERVICE, LLP L. A. TAX SERVICE, LLP TEL: (323) 658-5271 x12 FAX: (323) 395-5900 Email: estherlatax@pacbell.net

More information

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 January 22, 1999 Robert M. Kane, Jr. LeSourd & Patten, P.S. 600 University Street, Ste

More information

The new rules are generally effective for partnership audits of tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.

The new rules are generally effective for partnership audits of tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Please be aware that the following responses to FAQ s are based upon the statutory legislation and related guidance in the form of enacted and proposed regulations existing as of October 16, 2018. What

More information

April 11, We will also prepare the organization's Federal and State information returns for the 2010 tax periods.

April 11, We will also prepare the organization's Federal and State information returns for the 2010 tax periods. April 11, 2011 Ms. Amy Dresser Held Executive Director Citizens of the World Charter School 1316 N. Bronson Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90028 Dear Amy, We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services

More information

International Commercial Arbitration and the Arbitrator's Contract

International Commercial Arbitration and the Arbitrator's Contract Arbitration Law Review Volume 3 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 38 7-1-2011 International Commercial Arbitration and the Arbitrator's Contract Jaclyn Reilly Follow this and additional works

More information

Gleim EA Review Updates to Part Edition, 1st Printing April 2016

Gleim EA Review Updates to Part Edition, 1st Printing April 2016 Page 1 of 6 Gleim EA Review Updates to Part 3 2016 Edition, 1st Printing April 2016 NOTE: Text that should be deleted is displayed with a line through it. New text is shown with a blue background. This

More information

KEIR EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

KEIR EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES TAX PLANNING 2017 Published by: KEIR EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES 4785 Emerald Way Middletown, OH 45044 1-800-795-5347 1-800-859-5347 FAX E-mail customerservice@keirsuccess.com www.keirsuccess.com TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

WHAT EVERY PLANNER NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE COURT SYSTEM

WHAT EVERY PLANNER NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE COURT SYSTEM Diversity of opinion helps us be more successful! Your Success Matters! Therefore Prudential is pleased to provide you with material that offers different views and opinions on various subjects. Please

More information

CODIFICATION OF THE ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE DOCTRINE. John F. Robertson Arkansas State University (870)

CODIFICATION OF THE ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE DOCTRINE. John F. Robertson Arkansas State University (870) CODIFICATION OF THE ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE DOCTRINE John F. Robertson Arkansas State University jfrobert@astate.edu (870) 972-3038 Tina Quinn Arkansas State University tquinn@astate.edu (870) 972-3038 Rebecca

More information

CHAPTER 2 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS

CHAPTER 2 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS CHAPTER 2 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS Status: Q/P Question/ Learning Present in Prior Problem Objective Topic Edition Edition 1 LO 1 Intent of Congress Unchanged 1 2 LO 1 Alternatives

More information

This publication is one of a series of practicals that

This publication is one of a series of practicals that PRACTICAL WAR TAX RESISTANCE #1 Controlling Federal Income Tax Withholding This publication is one of a series of practicals that offer ideas, tips, and information for individuals who want to cut off

More information

135 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. WILLIAM PRENTICE COOPER, III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

135 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. WILLIAM PRENTICE COOPER, III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent 135 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WILLIAM PRENTICE COOPER, III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 24178-09W, 24179-09W. Filed July 8, 2010. P filed two claims

More information

PARKER TAX PUBLISHING

PARKER TAX PUBLISHING PARKER TAX PUBLISHING Tax Research Methodology: A Practical Guide to Perfecting Your Tax Research Techniques and Achieving Sustainable Tax Return Filing Positions Contributing Author: Peter J. Scalise,

More information

2017 Loscalzo Institute, a Kaplan Company

2017 Loscalzo Institute, a Kaplan Company June 5, 2017 Section: Exam IRS Warns Agents Against Using IRS Website FAQs to Sustain Positions in Exam... 2 Citation: SBSE-04-0517-0030, 5/30/17... 2 Section: Payments User Fees For Certain Rulings, Including

More information

14 - IRS Didn't Prove That Taxpayer Convicted of Filing False Returns Intended to Evade Tax

14 - IRS Didn't Prove That Taxpayer Convicted of Filing False Returns Intended to Evade Tax 14 - IRS Didn't Prove That Taxpayer Convicted of Filing False Returns Intended to Evade Tax Mathews, TC Memo 2018-212 The Tax Court has held that, although the taxpayer was convicted of filing false income

More information

Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning

Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning Income Tax Fundamentals 2011 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Learning Objectives Identify organizational structure of the IRS Understand IRS audit

More information

Test Bank for 2010 Federal Taxation with H&R Block TaxCut 4th Edition by James W.Pratt and William N.Kulsrud

Test Bank for 2010 Federal Taxation with H&R Block TaxCut 4th Edition by James W.Pratt and William N.Kulsrud Test Bank for 2010 Federal Taxation with H&R Block TaxCut 4th Edition by James W.Pratt and William N.Kulsrud TEST BANK True or False 1. Once a tax law is enacted by Congress, any official interpretations

More information

Table of Contents. About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface

Table of Contents. About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface Table of Contents About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface vii ix xi xiii xv Chapter 1 Initial Client Engagement 1 Topical Index 1 1.01 Nature of Federal Tax Law 5 1.02 Role

More information

Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals.

Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals. Dallas Bar Association Tax Section December 4, 2017 New Partnership Audit Rules: What They Mean to Partnerships and Tax Professionals Copyright All rights reserved. Presented By: Charles D. Pulman, J.D.,

More information

RETURN PREPARER PENALTIES UNDER TITLE 26

RETURN PREPARER PENALTIES UNDER TITLE 26 RETURN PREPARER PENALTIES UNDER TITLE 26 Bio Garrett Gregory Received JD from South Texas College of Law in 1999 Member of the Texas State Bar as of 1999 Received Master of Laws (Taxation) from Boston

More information

SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT

SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT This omnibus tax legislation, House Bill No. 799, was signed into law by Governor Phil Bryant on April 11, 2014, after passing the House of Representatives

More information

INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX PREPARATION ENGAGEMENT LETTER

INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX PREPARATION ENGAGEMENT LETTER INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX PREPARATION ENGAGEMENT LETTER (Date) (Client Name, including spouse) Re: Engagement Terms between Client referenced above and John Lebbs CPA, PLLC Terms and Conditions. This letter

More information

Client Side Penalties A Look at 6662 and It s Influence on Preparer Sanctions Podcast of June 29, 2007

Client Side Penalties A Look at 6662 and It s Influence on Preparer Sanctions Podcast of June 29, 2007 Client Side Penalties A Look at 6662 and It s Influence on Preparer Sanctions Podcast of June 29, 2007 Feed address for Podcast subscription: http://feeds.feedburner.com/edzollarstaxupdate Home page for

More information

Uncertain Income Tax Positions: An analysis of FIN 48, IRC Penalty Disclosure and Circular 230

Uncertain Income Tax Positions: An analysis of FIN 48, IRC Penalty Disclosure and Circular 230 Uncertain Income Tax Positions: An analysis of FIN 48, IRC Penalty Disclosure and Circular 230 Ian J. Redpath, Thomas Vogel, George Kermis, & Eric Redpath In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards

More information

Chapter 2 Professional Standards

Chapter 2 Professional Standards True/False Questions 1. The generally accepted auditing standards of field work include a requirement that the auditors obtain sufficient competent evidential matter. Answer: True Difficulty: Easy 2. The

More information

The Audit is Over Now What?

The Audit is Over Now What? Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick

More information

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 DAVID C. SWANSON, COMMISSIONER:

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 DAVID C. SWANSON, COMMISSIONER: STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION BADGER STATE ETHANOL, LLC, DOCKET NOS. 06-S-199, 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 Petitioner, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

More information

City Wide Transit, Inc. v. Comm'r 111 AFTR 2d (03/01/2013)

City Wide Transit, Inc. v. Comm'r 111 AFTR 2d (03/01/2013) City Wide Transit, Inc. v. Comm'r 111 AFTR 2d 2013-1012 (03/01/2013) CLICK HERE to return to the home page WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Some have suggested that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner")

More information

Resolving Tax Controversies: An Overview For Counsel Association of Corporate Counsel, 2017 Back to School Symposium August 15, 2017

Resolving Tax Controversies: An Overview For Counsel Association of Corporate Counsel, 2017 Back to School Symposium August 15, 2017 Resolving Tax Controversies: An Overview For Counsel Association of Corporate Counsel, 2017 Back to School Symposium August 15, 2017 Brent C. Gardner, Senior Tax Counsel, Director of Tax Controversy, Hewlett-Packard

More information

Contents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs)

Contents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs) NO.: 94-4R DATE: March 16, 2001 SUBJECT: International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs) This circular cancels and replaces Information Circular 94-4, dated December 30, 1994. This

More information

If you owned property repossessed by Anheuser-Busch Employees Credit Union, you could get valuable benefits from a class-action settlement.

If you owned property repossessed by Anheuser-Busch Employees Credit Union, you could get valuable benefits from a class-action settlement. TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT FOR ST. LOUIS CITY, MISSOURI If you owned property repossessed by Anheuser-Busch Employees Credit Union, you could get valuable benefits from a class-action settlement.

More information

Engagement Terms & Conditions

Engagement Terms & Conditions Engagement Terms & Conditions Under the requirements of our profession, we have prepared this written Engagement Terms & Conditions. Arkin & Associates, P.C. will provide professional accounting services

More information

Disputing an assessment

Disputing an assessment IR776 June 2018 Disputing an assessment What to do if you dispute an assessment 2 DISPUTING AN ASSESSMENT Introduction While we make every effort to apply the tax laws fairly and correctly, there may be

More information

Copyright (c) 2002 American Bar Association The Tax Lawyer. Summer, Tax Law. 961

Copyright (c) 2002 American Bar Association The Tax Lawyer. Summer, Tax Law. 961 Page 1 LENGTH: 4515 words SECTION: NOTE. Copyright (c) 2002 American Bar Association The Tax Lawyer Summer, 2002 55 Tax Law. 961 TITLE: THE REAL ESTATE EXCEPTION TO THE PASSIVE ACTIVITY RULES IN MOWAFI

More information

PRE-2011 STOCK OPTIONS ELECTION DEADLINE MAY BE APRIL 30

PRE-2011 STOCK OPTIONS ELECTION DEADLINE MAY BE APRIL 30 MARCIL LAVALLÉE Tax Letter Marcil Lavallée March 2011 In this issue: PRE-2011 STOCK OPTIONS ELECTION DEADLINE MAY BE APRIL 30 CAPITAL GAINS OR INCOME? HIGH TAXES ON MODEST EMPLOYMENT INCOME COURT CASES

More information

C A R A S & S H U L M A N, P C C e r t i f i e d P u b l i c A c c o u n t a n t s B u s i n e s s A d v i s o r s

C A R A S & S H U L M A N, P C C e r t i f i e d P u b l i c A c c o u n t a n t s B u s i n e s s A d v i s o r s C A R A S & S H U L M A N, P C C e r t i f i e d P u b l i c A c c o u n t a n t s B u s i n e s s A d v i s o r s Dear Client: Subject: 2016 Tax Engagement Letter This letter is to confirm and specify

More information

2 4 Generally accepted auditing standards are the Statements on Auditing Standards issued by the Auditing Standards Board.

2 4 Generally accepted auditing standards are the Statements on Auditing Standards issued by the Auditing Standards Board. CHAPTER 2 Professional Standards Review Questions 2 1 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 created the PCAOB and gave this body authority to develop auditing standards for the audits of public companies. The

More information

Does a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate Funds as Return of Capital?

Does a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate Funds as Return of Capital? Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law Faculty Publications 1-1-2008 Does a Taxpayer Have the Burden of Showing Intent to Divert Corporate

More information

Substantial Understatements the Penalty under 6662(b)(2) Podcast of July 8, 2007

Substantial Understatements the Penalty under 6662(b)(2) Podcast of July 8, 2007 Substantial Understatements the Penalty under 6662(b)(2) Podcast of July 8, 2007 Feed address for Podcast subscription: http://feeds.feedburner.com/edzollarstaxupdate Home page for Podcast: 2007 The TaxUpdate

More information

FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY. By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995

FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY. By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995 FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995 INTRODUCTION Should a taxing authority be able to forgive and forget - - that is, grant amnesty to taxpayers

More information

California's "Tax Amnesty": What Every California Taxpayer Should Know

California's Tax Amnesty: What Every California Taxpayer Should Know California's "Tax Amnesty": What Every California Taxpayer Should Know 2/17/2005 State + Local Tax Client Alert On August 16, 2004, California enacted a tax amnesty ("Amnesty Program") covering both sales

More information

Chapter 1 Introduction to Federal Taxation and Understanding the Federal Tax Law

Chapter 1 Introduction to Federal Taxation and Understanding the Federal Tax Law 1 Introduction to Federal Taxation and Understanding the Federal Tax Law SUMMARY OF CHAPTER This chapter presents information on the magnitude of federal taxes collected and on taxpayer obligations. Also,

More information

IRS Provides Guidance on FBAR Penalties

IRS Provides Guidance on FBAR Penalties Page 1 of 5 The Tax Adviser IRS Provides Guidance on FBAR Penalties Updated procedures on penalties imposed for failing to file the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts provide consistency and

More information

Legal Alert: Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certification Requirements and Best Practices September 12, I. Introduction

Legal Alert: Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certification Requirements and Best Practices September 12, I. Introduction Legal Alert: Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certification Requirements and Best Practices September 12, 2002 I. Introduction Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act ) became law on July 30, 2002, much attention

More information

Frequently Asked Questions for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Frequently Asked Questions for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Frequently Asked Questions for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy What is going to happen now that I have filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy? Since you have just filed a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, you probably have a lot of

More information

WHY YOUR PARTNERSHIP AND LLC OPERATING AGREEMENTS NEED A TUNE-UP IN 2018: THE NEW PARTNERSHIP RULES

WHY YOUR PARTNERSHIP AND LLC OPERATING AGREEMENTS NEED A TUNE-UP IN 2018: THE NEW PARTNERSHIP RULES WHY YOUR PARTNERSHIP AND LLC OPERATING AGREEMENTS NEED A TUNE-UP IN 2018: THE NEW PARTNERSHIP RULES Richard B. Robinson Robinson, Diss and Clowdus, P.C. 303-861-4154 rbrobinson@lektax.com PART I OVERVIEW

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF (ACCT. NO.: ) INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT DOCKET NO.: 17-061 TAX YEAR

More information

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD16-38895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2259 September Term, 2017 JEAN MEUS SR. v. LATASHA MEUS Reed, Friedman, Alpert,

More information

Business Income Tax Return Engagement Letter

Business Income Tax Return Engagement Letter Business Income Tax Return Engagement Letter January, 2017 Dear Client: The A.C.T. Group, Ltd. is pleased to provide you with the professional services described below. This letter confirms our understanding

More information

Comptroller Tax Process Improvements

Comptroller Tax Process Improvements Comptroller Tax Process Improvements Introduction Comptroller Susan Combs announces improvements to all phases of the Comptroller s tax process. After transferring the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)

More information

IRS CIRCULAR 230 (Eff and modified thereafter)

IRS CIRCULAR 230 (Eff and modified thereafter) IRS CIRCULAR 230 (Eff. 6-20-05 and modified thereafter) PURPOSE/APPLICATION: Provides ethical standards for attorneys, accountants and other tax professionals practicing before IRS and attempts to provide

More information

4. Dual Canadian - U.S citizens required to file foreign financial account FBAR disclosure returns annually or face U.S. penalties By Simon Sturm

4. Dual Canadian - U.S citizens required to file foreign financial account FBAR disclosure returns annually or face U.S. penalties By Simon Sturm 4. Dual Canadian - U.S citizens required to file foreign financial account FBAR disclosure returns annually or face U.S. penalties By Simon Sturm Under the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act a "U.S. person" with a

More information

FIFTH THIRD BANK CARD AGREEMENT

FIFTH THIRD BANK CARD AGREEMENT FIFTH THIRD BANK CARD AGREEMENT F03-W294-8 -0118 This Fifth Third Bank Credit Card Agreement ( Agreement ), which includes your Rate and Fee Summary, is your contract with us. Please read it carefully

More information

Sec Imposition of Accuracy-Related Penalty on Underpayments.

Sec Imposition of Accuracy-Related Penalty on Underpayments. Sec. 6662. Imposition of Accuracy-Related Penalty on Underpayments. (a) Imposition of Penalty. If this section applies to any portion of an underpayment of tax required to be shown on a return, there shall

More information

c» BALANCE C:» Financially Empowering You Financial First Aid Podcast [Music plays] Nikki:

c» BALANCE C:» Financially Empowering You Financial First Aid Podcast [Music plays] Nikki: Financial First Aid Podcast [Music plays] Nikki: You re listening to Financial first aid. Hi. I m Nicky, your host for today s podcast. Many circumstances in life can derail even the best plans and leave

More information

New Standards For Advisors and Tax Returns Preparers Under IRC 6694 and Circular

New Standards For Advisors and Tax Returns Preparers Under IRC 6694 and Circular New Standards For Advisors and Tax Returns Preparers Under IRC 6694 and Circular 230 10.34 Spring 2008 Symposium Income and Transfer Tax Planning Group Real Property, Trust & Estate Law Section American

More information

IRM TAS Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process Reason for Change Key:

IRM TAS Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process Reason for Change Key: Reason for 13.1.7.8(1) is 13.1.20.1(1) 13.1.7.8.1(1) is 13.1.20.1 Internal Revenue Code section 7811 authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to issue a Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) on cases meeting

More information

Frequently Asked Questions Revised June 24, Why did the IRS issue internal guidance regarding offshore activities now?

Frequently Asked Questions Revised June 24, Why did the IRS issue internal guidance regarding offshore activities now? Revised June 24, 2009 1. Why did the IRS issue internal guidance regarding offshore activities now? The IRS has had a voluntary disclosure practice in its Criminal Manual for many years. Once IRS Criminal

More information

be known well in advance of the final IRS determination.

be known well in advance of the final IRS determination. Tax-exempt organizations, however, do not function in a perfect world. When the IRS opens an examination, it usually does so for the earliest tax period for which an organization s statute of limitations

More information

KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW

KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILLIAM CORNELL ARCHBOLD, JR* JOSEPH PATRICK O'BRIEN** JOHN YANOSHAK CHRISTOPHER H. PEIFER*** OF COUNSEL FRED KREPPEL GLEN MADERE EDWARD KASSAB 1927-2010 *ALSO MEMBER

More information

CHAPTER 25 TAX ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition

CHAPTER 25 TAX ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition CHAPTER 25 TAX ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition 1 Rates of audit Unchanged 1 2 Document matching and preparer

More information

POLICY LIMIT DEMANDS - PART II: A VIEW INTO THE OTHER ROOM

POLICY LIMIT DEMANDS - PART II: A VIEW INTO THE OTHER ROOM POLICY LIMIT DEMANDS - PART II: A VIEW INTO THE OTHER ROOM Negotiations during mediation can be a bit like playing poker you know what is in your hand (what you are willing to offer, or accept, to settle)

More information

Circuit Court for Howard County Case No. 13-K UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Howard County Case No. 13-K UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Howard County Case No. 13-K-16-057230 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1258 September Term, 2017 LAURA BOUMA v. STATE OF MARYLAND Wright, Kehoe, Raker, Irma

More information

Client Tax Letter. Back to the Brink. What s Inside. October/November/ December Special Issue: 2012 Tax Planning Roundup 1 Back to the Brink

Client Tax Letter. Back to the Brink. What s Inside. October/November/ December Special Issue: 2012 Tax Planning Roundup 1 Back to the Brink Client Tax Letter Tax Saving and Planning Strategies from your Trusted Business Advisor sm October/November/ December 2012 Back to the Brink Two years ago, many tax laws that were enacted in the early

More information

Trust Fund Recovery. A Tax Resolution Institute Publication 2016

Trust Fund Recovery. A Tax Resolution Institute Publication 2016 A Tax Resolution Institute Publication 2016 Trust Fund Recovery Facing possible retributions such as civil liability for unpaid employment taxes, including penalties and interest, and possible criminal

More information

UILC: , , , , , ,

UILC: , , , , , , Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200503031 Release Date: 01/21/2005 CC:PA:APJP:B02 ------------ SCAF-119247-04 UILC: 6702.00-00, 6702.01-00, 6611.09-00, 6501.05-00, 6501.05-07,

More information

Online Personal Demand Deposit Account Terms and Conditions

Online Personal Demand Deposit Account Terms and Conditions Online Personal Demand Deposit Account Terms and Conditions 1. Your Agreement 1.1 These terms and conditions are additional to the terms and conditions for our Current, Demand Deposit and Masterplan Accounts

More information

Frank Aragona Trust v. Commissioner: Guidance at Last on The Material Participation Standard for Trusts? By Dana M. Foley 1

Frank Aragona Trust v. Commissioner: Guidance at Last on The Material Participation Standard for Trusts? By Dana M. Foley 1 Frank Aragona Trust v. Commissioner: Guidance at Last on The Material Participation Standard for Trusts? By Dana M. Foley 1 Nearly a year after the enactment of the 3.8% Medicare Tax, taxpayers and fiduciaries

More information

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions For whatever your future holds Frequently asked questions What is Mover Membership? Mover Membership is a unique package of member benefits which has been designed specifically for customers of Lifetime

More information

Welcome to NCSSSA s webinar on Qualified versus Qualifying retirement plans.

Welcome to NCSSSA s webinar on Qualified versus Qualifying retirement plans. Welcome to NCSSSA s webinar on Qualified versus Qualifying retirement plans. Just a bit of housekeeping before we get started--- Through Webex we can mute all participants so we don t hear all of your

More information

11 USC 505. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

11 USC 505. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 5 - CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE SUBCHAPTER I - CREDITORS AND CLAIMS 505. Determination of tax liability (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection,

More information

Busy Season. all year long. TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power!

Busy Season. all year long. TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power! 1 TRI Tax Resolution Institute where your tax debt is your power! Busy Season all year long www.taxresolutioninstitute.org info@taxresolutioninstitute.org (877) 829-8370 2 Appeals www.taxresolutioninstitute.org

More information

LEGAL ALERT. March 17, Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators

LEGAL ALERT. March 17, Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators LEGAL ALERT March 17, 2011 Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators Whenever firms and individuals are faced with SEC and FINRA investigations and enforcement

More information

Your client calls frantic one

Your client calls frantic one The IRS Disqualified Employment Tax Levy Just When the Client Thought It Was Safe to Owe Money Again By Lauren M. McNair, Esq. and Eric L. Green, Esq., Green & Sklarz LLC Your client calls frantic one

More information

State Tax Return PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS

State Tax Return PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS June 2009 State Tax Return Volume 16 Number 2 PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS E. Kendrick Smith Shane A. Lord Atlanta Atlanta (404) 581-8343 (404) 581-8055 On March 30, 2009, the Georgia General

More information

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 24 RS UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 JOHN M. CRIM, Petitioner(s, v. Docket No. 1638-15 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

More information

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals September 25, 1997 Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals By: Glenn Newman This new feature of the New York Law Journal will highlight cases involving New York State and City tax controversies

More information

Part 7 Overpayments and Fraud

Part 7 Overpayments and Fraud Part 7 Overpayments and Fraud 101 What if I was overpaid SNAP benefits? If you get more SNAP benefits than you are eligible for, DTA can recover the overpayment. 106 C.M.R. 367.490. An overpayment can

More information

RE: Engagement Letter for Preparation of Individual Income Tax Return:

RE: Engagement Letter for Preparation of Individual Income Tax Return: RE: Engagement Letter for Preparation of Individual Income Tax Return: Dear Client: We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. To minimize the possibility of a misunderstanding between us, we are

More information

STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAX PROVISIONS TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT

STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAX PROVISIONS TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAX PROVISIONS TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT Teresa M. Dieguez, CPA Vice President of Corporate Tax Wynn Resorts Limited Las Vegas, NV teresa.dieguez@wynnresorts.com Smitha Hahn, CPA Senior

More information

Top Ten Things You Should Know About Employee Benefits

Top Ten Things You Should Know About Employee Benefits Top Ten Things You Should Know About Employee Benefits AIDS Legal Referral Panel April 19, 2018 MCLE Training Kirsten Scott Renaker Hasselman Scott, LLP 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 944 San Francisco,

More information

Important Information on Penny Stocks

Important Information on Penny Stocks Important Information on Penny Stocks This statement is required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and contains important information on penny stocks. Your broker-dealer is required

More information

PARSONS & CUMMINGS LIMITED

PARSONS & CUMMINGS LIMITED PARSONS & CUMMINGS LIMITED MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS 245 Yorkland Blvd., Suite 100 Willowdale, Ontario M2J 4W9 Tel: (416) 490-8810 Fax: (416) 490-8275 Internet: www.parsons.on.ca TAX LETTER September 2013

More information

Federal Tax Research

Federal Tax Research Federal Tax Research Federal Tax Research Second Edition Joni Larson Professor of Law Thomas M. Cooley Law School Dan Sheaffer Professor of Law Thomas M. Cooley Law School Carolina Academic Press Durham,

More information

Case An Offer You Can t Refuse

Case An Offer You Can t Refuse Case 10-10 An Offer You Can t Refuse Fast Eddie, a publicly held company, manufactures and installs refrigeration systems for governmental and commercial applications. Fast Eddie is being investigated

More information

Rookie Mistake #7. What is a Capitalization Table and what does it say about my Company?

Rookie Mistake #7. What is a Capitalization Table and what does it say about my Company? THE TECHNOLOGY VENTURE ALLIANCE Rookie Mistake #7 What is a Capitalization Table and what does it say about my Company? The Mistake Entrepreneurs are often confused when a potential investor asks to see

More information

The Anti-Injunction Act Issue

The Anti-Injunction Act Issue The Anti-Injunction Act Issue By Bryan Camp and Jordan Barry United States Department of Health and Human Services et al. v. State of Florida et al. Docket No. 11-398 Argument Date: March 26, 2012 From:

More information

A Practical Guide to ERISA Research. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA

A Practical Guide to ERISA Research. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA A Practical Guide to ERISA Research Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA Your Presenters Today Ilene H. Ferenczy, JD, CPC, APA Tim McCutcheon, JD, CPA, MBA 2 Facilitator:

More information

Current Federal Tax Developments

Current Federal Tax Developments Current Federal Tax Developments Week of January 21, 2019 Edward K. Zollars, CPA (Licensed in Arizona) CURRENT FEDERAL TAX DEVELOPMENTS WEEK OF JANUARY 21, 2019 2019 Kaplan, Inc. Published in 2019 by Kaplan

More information

MINNESOTA Department of Revenue

MINNESOTA Department of Revenue MINNESOTA Department of Revenue Insurance Premiums Taxes Department Recodification Bill February 4, 2000 Department of Revenue Analysis of S.F. 2655 Revenue Gain or (Loss) F.Y. 2000 F.Y. 2001 Biennium

More information

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session ***

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** O.C.G.A. 48-5-311 GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** TITLE 48. REVENUE AND TAXATION CHAPTER 5. AD VALOREM TAXATION

More information

LAUREN ROSS Attorney at Law 2550 N. Hollywood Way Suite 404 Burbank, CA Tel.(818) Facsimile (818)

LAUREN ROSS Attorney at Law 2550 N. Hollywood Way Suite 404 Burbank, CA Tel.(818) Facsimile (818) LAUREN ROSS Attorney at Law 2550 N. Hollywood Way Suite 404 Burbank, CA 91505-5046 Tel.(818) 847-0211 Facsimile (818) 847-0214 INITIAL CONSULTATION AGREEMENT AND REQUIRED NOTICES Please Note: These documents

More information