The Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Receipt of Compensation for the Removal of Commercial Citrus Trees
|
|
- Priscilla Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dean, Mead, Minton & Zwemer 1903 South 25th Street, Suite 200 P.O. Box 2757 (ZIP 34954) Fort Pierce, Florida Fax Orlando Fort Pierce Viera MICHAEL D. MINTON x September 2006 The Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Receipt of Compensation for the Removal of Commercial Citrus Trees By Michael D. Minton, Esq. and Christopher R. D Amico, Esq. In 1995, the U.S. Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) established a program intended to assist in the eradication of citrus canker in the State of Florida under which eligible owners of commercial citrus groves could, subject to the availability of funds, receive compensation for the removal of commercial citrus trees in an effort to eradicate citrus canker. As many of our readers are aware, as a result of the spread of citrus canker across the state due to the hurricanes of 2004 and 2005, on January 10, 2006 the USDA suspended any future funding of the citrus canker eradication program in the State of Florida. However, it has been reported that the USDA is committed to fully funding the eradication efforts initiated up through January 10, This article will address the federal income tax consequences of the receipt by a citrus grower of payments under three different scenarios. The first scenario addresses what is commonly referred to as the cash out scenario, when the grower will not reinvest the USDA payments into a replacement citrus grove or replacement property of any kind. The second scenario addresses the grower that intends to reinvest in replacement property other than a replacement citrus grove, and the final scenario addresses the reinvestment of the payments into a replacement citrus grove. I. CASH OUT SCENARIO Commercial citrus growers that suffered an eradication of their citrus trees due to infection or exposure to citrus canker were compensated with two types of payments, (i) a tree replacement payment (or lost tree payment ) and (ii) a lost production replacement payment (or lost production payment ). Both the lost tree payment and lost production payment were based upon a maximum amount per acre based upon the variety of trees destroyed. See 7 C.F.R The lost tree payments were determined using a payment of $26 per tree up to a maximum of between $2,704 and $4,004 per acre, depending on the variety of trees removed. The lost production payments were based upon a complicated formula that in essence determined the net difference between the present value of the projected estimated return from the variety of trees destroyed (assuming the trees had remained in production) and what the USDA projected
2 would be derived from a replanted grove using a 25 year production life cycle for lime trees and a 36 year production life cycle for all other citrus varieties. In the event that the grower does not intend to reinvest any of the payments received into replacement property, then the least controversial approach would be to treat the amounts received by the grower for lost production payments as ordinary income subject to the graduated tax rates of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code ). Such amounts may, however, be eligible for income averaging under Code Section Code Section 1301 provides that, at the election of an individual engaged in a farming business, any tax imposed under Code Section 1 shall be equal to the taxable income of the taxpayer reduced by elected farm income plus the increase in tax which would result if the taxable income of the taxpayer for each of the three (3) prior years were increased by an amount equal to onethird of the elected farm income. I.R.C. 1301(a). Elected farm income is taxable income attributable to any farming business and includes gains from the sale or other disposition of property (other than land) regularly used in the farming business. I.R.C. 1301(b)(1)(A). An individual engaged in farming includes a partner in a partnership engaged in the farming business and a shareholder of a S Corporation engaged in the farming business. Treas. Reg (b)(1). The term farming business means the trade or business of raising or harvesting any agricultural or horticultural commodity, including the raising or harvesting of trees bearing fruit. Treas. Reg 1.263A-4(a)(4). Essentially, Code Section 1301 accomplishes income averaging by permanently increasing the taxpayer s income in the three years prior to the year in which the taxpayer received the elected farm income. Therefore, the election to elect income averaging under Code Section 1301 should be taken into account in an overall strategy looking at the possibility that the taxpayer will need to make future decisions regarding income averaging and any effects that the income averaging election would have on the alternative minimum tax liability of the taxpayer. When one analyzes the lost production payments further, however, one comes to the conclusion that not all of the lost production payments should be recognized as ordinary income, but rather some portion should be eligible for long-term capital gain treatment (similar to arguments that were successfully asserted in the line of cases and Revenue Rulings addressing settlement proceeds received by nursery owners in connection with the application of the fungicide Benlate ). See, Pennroad Corporation v. Commissioner, 21 T.C (1954), acq C.B. 7, aff d 228 F.2d 329 (3rd Cir. 1956); Berbiglia v. Commissioner, 10 T.C.M. (CCH) 413 (1951);Rev. Rul , C.B. 200; Rev. Rul , C.B. 143, Rev. Rul , C.B. 25; Rev. Rul , C.B. 302; and Priv. Ltr. Rul Generally, the theory is that the lost production payment received far exceeds what the grower could reasonably have expected to receive from the grove for that fruit season or the several succeeding seasons thereafter; therefore, the payment must be for something more than reimbursing the grower for lost income for that season. This analysis is very fact specific and would depend on factors such as the production history of the affected groves, the stage of production that the affected groves were in at the time of the conversion and the total capital impairment suffered by the taxpayer as a result of the eradication of the affected groves.
3 Any amounts received by the grower for lost tree payments would be received in connection with the sale or exchange of property used in a trade or business (even though, in this event, it would be a forced sale or exchange), and therefore, any gain or loss recognized by the grower upon receipt of the lost tree payments would be determined under Code Section I.R.C. 1231(a). Under Code Section 1231, if there is a gain realized by the taxpayer in connection with the receipt of the lost tree payments (i.e., the amount of the lost tree payments received exceeded the taxpayer s adjusted basis in the trees destroyed), then any such gain would be characterized as a long-term capital gain. Id. In the event that the taxpayer realized a loss in connection with the receipt of the lost tree payments (i.e. the amount of the lost tree payments received was less than the taxpayer s adjusted basis in the trees destroyed), then the loss would be recognized as an ordinary loss. Id. All gains and losses from the sale of all Code Section 1231 properties for each tax year are netted together, therefore determining whether an individual taxpayer will have a gain or loss under Code Section 1231 will depend upon the total Code Section 1231 transactions in the tax year in question. Id. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Code Section 1245(a) provides that in the event that Section 1245 property is disposed of (citrus trees are section 1245 property), then the taxpayer will recognize ordinary income to the extent of the depreciation deductions allowed with respect to such Code Section 1245 property. I.R.C. 1245(a). Despite the characterization of any gain under Code Section 1231 as long term capital gain, Code Section 1245 will recharacterize a portion of that gain recognized upon the receipt of any lost tree payments as ordinary income. Obviously, if the grower in question is classified as a C Corporation for federal income tax purposes, then the grower would not be able to take advantage of any preferential long-term capital gains tax rates discussed above. II. REINVESTMENT IN OTHER REPLACEMENT PROPERTY In the event that the grower intends to reinvest the payments into replacement property (other than a replacement citrus grove), then the lost production payments in excess of that portion treated as ordinary income should also be eligible for non-recognition treatment under Code Section 1033 as discussed below. The lost tree payments received by the grower will be eligible for non-recognition of gain pursuant to Code Section 1033, if the grower uses such proceeds to purchase property which is similar or related in service or use or like-kind (where the converted property is real property) to the property involuntarily converted. I.R.C. 1033(a) and 1033(g). Generally, the grower will have a period of (i) two years after the close of the taxable year in which the grower received the eligible payments to acquire property similar or related in service or use, or (ii) three years after the close of the taxable year in which the grower received the eligible payments to acquire like-kind property. Id. The basis of the property acquired as replacement property pursuant to Code Section 1033 will equal the cost of the replacement property decreased by the amount of any gain not recognized upon the conversion. I.R.C. 1033(b)(2). Extensions of the replacement periods under Code Section 1033 may be granted by the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) if the taxpayer shows that there is reasonable cause for the failure to make the timely replacement. Treas. Reg (a)-2(c)(3).
4 In order for replacement property to be considered similar or related in service or use, it must meet the following test: (i) the reinvestment must be made in substantially similar property; (ii) the reinvestment must be a substantial continuation of the prior commitment of the capital, not a departure from it; (iii) the replacement property need not duplicate the converted property, but the character of the investment must not be changed; and (iv) the entire transaction must return the taxpayer, whose enjoyment of property has been interrupted without his consent, as closely as possible to his original position. Maloof v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 263 (1975). For example, it has been held that the replacement of a cattle farm with prune, apricot and walnut orchards qualifies as replacement property which is similar or related in service or use to the converted property. Rev. Rul , C.B While it appears that any farming business should qualify as similar or related in service or use to a condemned citrus grove under Code Section 1033, the determination of whether replacement property meets the similar or related in service or use test, particularly when the converted property is not identical or in the same line of business to the property condemned, is very fact specific and, in some rulings the results appear contradictory. Therefore, it may be advantageous to seek a private letter ruling from the IRS to be certain of the tax treatment under a specific set of facts. Under Florida law, it is clear that trees planted in the ground are considered real property and part of the land upon which they grow (until severed from the land), and therefore would be eligible for the three year like kind replacement period under Code Section 1033(g). Zaun v. Commissioner, T.C.M ; In re Mahon, 1998 WL (M.D. FL. 1998); and Priv. Ltr. Rul The term like-kind refers to the nature and/or character of the property and not its grade or quality and, therefore the kind of real property that can be exchanged under the like-kind rules is very broad. Treas Reg (a)-1(b). The fact that the real property involved is improved or unimproved is not material. Id. For example, commercial property replacing condemned agricultural land has been held to be like-kind property. Priv. Ltr. Rul Given the broad nature of the like kind rules of Code Section 1033(g), almost any type of real property, including commercial investment real property should qualify as replacement property for a converted citrus grove. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Code Section 1245(a) provides that in the event Section 1245 property (citrus trees are considered Section 1245 property) is disposed of (whether voluntarily or involuntarily), then the taxpayer will recognize ordinary income (assuming the taxpayer is otherwise realizing a gain on the transaction) to the extent of the depreciation deductions allowed with respect to such Code Section 1245 property. I.R.C. 1245(a). However, if Code Section 1245 property is disposed of and gain is not recognized in whole or in part under Code Section 1033, and the replacement property includes property which is characterized as Code Section 1245 property, then the amount of gain taken into account under Code Section 1245 shall not exceed the sum of the amount of gain recognized on the disposition (without regard to Section 1245), plus the fair market value of property acquired which is not Code Section 1245 property. I.R.C. 1245(b)(4). Any unrecognized Section 1245 gain is transferred to the Section 1245 replacement property and will be recognized upon the future sale or conversion of the Section 1245 replacement property. Treas. Reg (c)(4). While it appears that most real property would qualify as like kind replacement property to any converted real property (including converted citrus groves), most buildings or structures on commercial investment real property are classified as Section 1250 property (not Section 1245 property) and, therefore using commercial investment real property as replacement property for a citrus grove would generally
5 not allow the taxpayer to defer the recognition of any Section 1245 recapture income inherent in the converted property. However, with proper planning, it is possible through the use of a properly prepared cost segregation analysis on the proposed replacement property to defer some or all of the Code Section 1245 recapture income, even when the replacement property would normally be classified as Section 1250 property. A cost segregation analysis is simply an engineering study performed on real property that can allow the allocation or reallocation of building or acquisition costs to the building s (or structure s) component parts that are classified as Section 1245 property (not Section 1250 property) and, therefore eligible for deferral of gain under Code Section 1033 (or more commonly, eligible for accelerated depreciation). If the grower that is seeking to take advantage of Code Section 1033 is taxed as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and the converted property is encumbered by liabilities, then Code Sections 731 and 752 can create a trap for the unwary (if the partners do not have sufficient basis in their partnership interests). For example, Partnership X operates a commercial citrus grove. Partnership X is owned 50% by Partner A and 50% by Partner B. Each Partner has an adjusted basis in its partnership interest of $250,000. In Year 1, Partnership X suffers a condemnation of its citrus grove and receives a payment of $1,000,000. The Partnership s adjusted basis in the citrus grove was $500,000 and the grove was encumbered by a $750,000 debt. The partnership realized a $500,000 gain on the condemnation of the grove ($1,000,000 amount realized minus the $500,000 adjusted basis). In Year 1 the Partnership uses $750,000 of the amount realized to pay off the $500,000 debt. In Year 2, within the replacement period under Code Section 1033, Partnership X acquires qualified replacement property paying $250,000 cash and borrowing the remaining $750,000. While Partnership X did not recognize any gain upon the receipt of the condemnation proceeds under Code Section 1033 in Year 1, Partner A and B each did experience a $375,000 decrease in their share of partnership liabilities, which resulted in a constructive distribution under Code Section 752 of $375,000 to each Partner. This constructive distribution under Code Section 752 resulted in each Partner recognizing $125,000 in gain in Year 1 because the constructive distribution under Code Section 752 exceeded each Partner s adjusted basis in their partnership interests ($300,000 constructive distribution minus $250,000 adjusted basis). III. REINVESTMENT IN REPLACEMENT CITRUS GROVE As discussed above, generally, no gain will be recognized by a grower on that portion of the lost production payments, if any, received by the grower that is not treated as ordinary income, if such portion is used to purchase property which is similar or related in service or use or like kind to the condemned property, subject to the recapture rules of Code Section If the grower intends to replant replacement groves on its existing property, the grower will generally have a period of two (2) years to complete the replanting. I.R.C. 1033(a). Trees which have not been replanted in the ground would not be like kind real property and therefore the related or similar use test would apply with its shorter replacement period. If the grower intends to use the eligible payments to purchase any improved or unimproved real property constituting like-kind property, the grower will generally have a period of three (3) years to purchase such like-kind property. I.R.C. 1033(g). Prior to January 10, 2006, the citrus canker eradication program regulations required a two (2) year quarantine (approval for replanting after one (1) year could be obtained) before replanting of citrus on the affected property. While these
6 quarantine rules were also suspended on January 10, 2006, there still exists a practical limitation on the ability for an affected grower to replant because of the limited availability of healthy nursery trees. Therefore, filing an application for an extension of time to replant with the IRS will most likely be necessary. Once those funds which qualify under Code Section 1033 for reinvestment have been exhausted, Code Section 263A provides incentives to growers to replant the same type of fruit as were previously grown and allow growers to expense currently the cost of replanting. I.R.C. 263A(d)(2). While Code Section 263A generally requires the capitalization of the costs incurred to plant a citrus grove and bring it into production, Code Section 263A(d)(2) provides that if plants bearing an edible crop for human consumption were lost or damaged by reason of disease or other casualty, then Code Section 263A shall not apply to any costs of replanting plants bearing the same type of crop (whether on the same land under which such loss or damage occurred or any other land of the same acreage). Id. There is no direct authority that the destruction of healthy trees due to the proximity to a diseased tree meets the requirement of this definition, but one may conclude that this would meet the requirement for the by reason of disease requirement. While Code Section 263A(d)(2) will apply to replanting costs incurred with respect to property other than the grower s existing property that suffered the damage, Code Section 263A(d)(2) only applies to the extent of the acreage of the property that suffered the damage or loss. Treas. Reg 1.263A-4(e)(1). In addition, Code Section 263A only applies to the pre-productive period expenses during the pre-productive period (or the period before the first marketable crop or yield). See TAM and Treas. Reg A-4(b)(2)(i). Preproductive expenses include the costs of replanting, cultivation, maintenance and development of the crops. Id. The costs of the replacement trees are not pre-productive expenses and must be capitalized. Treas. Reg A(d)(3). This preferential expensing of the pre-productive expenses could be available to offset any income recognized from the receipt by the grower of the lost production payments described above. Code Section 263A(d) also encourages new investors to help finance the replanting efforts. Code Section 263A(d)(2) allow persons other than the grower that owned the property at the time the trees were damaged to currently deduct the costs of replanting and growing out a grove to a productive age, provided that the grower that owned the grove at the time of the destruction continues to own an equity interest of more than fifty percent (50%) in such grove at all times during the taxable year in which the replanting costs are paid or incurred and such other investors (i.e. other than the grower) materially participate in the management of such replacement crops during the taxable year in which the replanting costs are paid or incurred. Id. While the USDA has suspended any future funding of the eradication of citrus canker through the removal of diseased trees, there still remain a substantial number of growers that have received or will receive lost tree and lost production payments for diseased trees eradicated prior to the suspension of funding by the USDA. Careful analysis and planning will need to be undertaken for such grower s to determine the tax effect of the receipt of said payments to each grower, particularly where the grower intends to take advantage of Code Section 1033 and Code Section 263A.
Natural disaster, tax disaster?
Natural disaster, tax disaster? Tax implications of a destroyed property insurance settlement for both taxable and tax-exempt clubs By James J. Reilly, CPA, JD Although the formation of hurricanes is possible
More informationCosts regarded as developmental expenditures
Section 263A. Capitalization and Inclusion in Inventory Costs of Certain Expenses 26 CFR 1.263A 4T: Rules for property produced in a farming business (temporary). T.D. 8729 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal
More informationPLR Section Involuntary Conversions Release Date: 5/22/2009 Date: February 13, 2009
PLR 200921009 - Section 1033 - Involuntary Conversions Release Date: 5/22/2009 Date: February 13, 2009 Dear [redacted data]: This is in response to your request for a private letter ruling dated July 10,
More informationHurricanes Florence and Michael: Casualty Loss Deductions
What s News in Tax Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax Hurricanes Florence and Michael: Casualty Loss Deductions October 15, 2018 by Lynn Afeman and James Atkinson, Washington National Tax
More informationTaxation Issues associated with the Butte Fire. Larry Camp CA. RPF No October 28, 2015
Taxation Issues associated with the Butte Fire Larry Camp CA. RPF No. 1698 October 28, 2015 DISCLAIMER Today s discussion is educational, NOT legal or accounting advice, since the facts and circumstances
More information26 CFR : Changes in accounting periods and in methods of accounting. (Also Part 1, 263A; 1.263A-4)
26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and in methods of accounting. (Also Part 1, 263A; 1.263A-4) Rev. Proc. 2018-35 SECTION 1. PURPOSE Section 13207 of An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant
More informationFarm Service Agency Emergency Loan Program
Farm Service Agency Emergency Loan Program Overview Emergency loans help producers recover from production and physical losses due to natural disasters. Uses of EM Loan Funds Restore or replace essential
More informationConsidering the Tax Consequences of Carbon Credits
Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A. 800 North Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1500 P.O. Box 2346 (ZIP 32802-2346) Orlando, FL 32803 Orlando Fort Pierce Viera 407-841-1200 407-423-1831 Fax
More informationIRS Issues Notice of proposed ruling on self-employment tax treatment of CRP payments - Suggested outline for comments now available
IRS Issues Notice of proposed ruling on self-employment tax treatment of CRP payments - Suggested outline for comments now available 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu Updated
More informationEditor's Summary. Facts. District Court [opinion at p. 686] Court of Appeals [opinion below]
CARLOATE INDUSTRIES INC. v. UNITED STATES 354 F.2d 814; 66-1 USTC 9159; 17 AFTR 2{1 59 (5th Cir. 1966). Reversing 230 F. Supp. 282; 64-2 USTC 9564; 14 AFTR 2d 5327 (S.D. Tex. 1964). Key Topics CASUALTY
More informationTax Traps in Oil and Gas Like-Kind Exchange Transactions. Todd Way Vinson & Elkins LLP Dallas, Texas. Julia Pashin Vinson & Elkins LLP Dallas, Texas
Tax Traps in Oil and Gas Like-Kind Exchange Transactions Todd Way Vinson & Elkins LLP Dallas, Texas Julia Pashin Vinson & Elkins LLP Dallas, Texas 14.01 Oil and Gas Like-Kind Exchange Transactions after
More informationNET OPERATING LOSSES
TAX GUIDE FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE FARMS CHAPTER 10 SYNPOSIS (click on section title to go directly there) Introduction... 10.2 Computing the NOL... 10.3 Items Not Included in
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Sophisticated Estate Planning Techniques
397 ALI-ABA Course of Study Sophisticated Estate Planning Techniques Cosponsored by Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. September 4-5, 2008 Boston, Massachusetts Planning for Private Equity
More informationTax Planning for S Corporations: Mergers and Acquisitions Involving S Corporations (Part 1)
Tax Planning for S Corporations: Mergers and Acquisitions Involving S Corporations (Part 1) Jerald David August and Stephen R. Looney 1.01 INTRODUCTION The tax considerations relating to the sale and purchase
More informationDAMAGED, DESTROYED, OR STOLEN PROPERTY
CHAPTER 8 DAMAGED, DESTROYED, OR STOLEN PROPERTY SYNPOSIS (click on section title to go directly there) Introduction... 8.1 General Rules... 8.2 Casualty and Theft Losses... 8.2 Personal-Use Property...
More informationTAX MEMORANDUM. CPAs, Clients & Associates. David L. Silverman, Esq. Shirlee Aminoff, Esq. DATE: April 2, Attorney-Client Privilege
LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM
More information3. Extension and modification of bonus depreciation (sec. 143 of the bill and sec. 168(k) of the Code) Present Law
3. Extension and modification of bonus depreciation (sec. 143 of the bill and sec. 168(k) of the Code) In general Present Law An additional first-year depreciation deduction is allowed equal to 50 percent
More information4 Estate Tax Issues 1
4 Estate Tax Issues 1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW One of the primary reasons for creating an ILIT is to keep life insurance proceeds out of the insured s gross estate for federal estate tax purposes. See, section
More informationIRC 751 "Hot Assets": Calculating and Reporting Ordinary Income in Disposition of Partnership or LLC Interests
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY IRC 751 "Hot Assets": Calculating and Reporting Ordinary Income in Disposition of Partnership or LLC Interests WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION
More informationOffice of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum Number: 200325002 Release Date: 6/20/2003 UILC: 1401.00-00 CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1 SCA-147742-01 date: May 29, 2003 to: from: VIRGINIA E. COCHRAN DEPUTY
More informationTax and Legal Issues Associated With The 2012 Drought
Tax and Legal Issues Associated With The 2012 Drought 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu July 20, 2012 Updated August 24, 2012 - by Roger McEowen * Overview The drought in
More informationUPSTREAM OIL AND GAS LIKE-KIND EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS AFTER TAX REFORM
FEBRUARY 27, 2018 UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS LIKE-KIND EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS AFTER TAX REFORM Tax Executives Institute Houston Chapter Presented by Julia Pashin and Megan James BIOGRAPHY JULIA PASHIN Summary
More informationAn Analysis of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010
January 2011 / Issue 1 A legal update from Dechert s Financial Services Group An Analysis of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 d Summary The Regulated Investment Company Modernization
More informationESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR S CORPORATIONS
ESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION FOR S CORPORATIONS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. ALLOCATING INCOME IN THE YEAR OF DEATH... 1 III. SHAREHOLDER ELIGIBILITY... 2 A. Estates... 2 B. Certain Trusts... 3 1. Grantor
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21212 Updated August 29, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Summary Agricultural Disaster Assistance Ralph M. Chite Specialist in Agricultural Policy Resources, Science,
More informationAt your request, we have examined the issues concerning possible Treas. Reg.
MEMORANDUM TO: Senior Partner FROM: LL.M. Team Number DATE: November 8, 2013 SUBJECT: 2013-2014 Law Student Tax Challenge Problem At your request, we have examined the issues concerning possible Treas.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I FARM PROBLEMS & EXAMPLES. Installment Contracts and Deferred Grain Contracts
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I FARM PROBLEMS & EXAMPLES Page Installment Contracts and Deferred Grain Contracts... 1-2 Example of Reporting an Installment Sale (Example-Forms)... 3-6 Example of Taxpayer s
More informationDecember 27, 2018 CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG ), Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044
December 27, 2018 CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-115420-18), Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044 Submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov Re: Treasury
More informationCharitable Gifts. Carolyn M. Osteen
Charitable Gifts Carolyn M. Osteen A. Income Tax Deduction For Charitable Gifts 1. The percentage limitations for income tax deductions for charitable contributions by individuals. a. Basic limit: 50 percent
More informationWhether an account receivable established by an election to apply Rev. Proc constitutes related party indebtedness under I.R.C. 965(b)(3).
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: AM2008-010 Release Date: 9/12/2008 CC:INTL:B03:JLParry POSTN-120024-08 UILC: 965.00-00 date: September 04, 2008 to: from: Area Counsel
More informationInternal Revenue Bulletin: (Excerpted from IRS website)
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2007 25 (Excerpted from www.irs.gov, IRS website) June 18, 2007 Notice 2007 50 Guidance Regarding Deductions by Individuals for Qualified Conservation Contributions Table of
More informationWILDFIRES AND HURRICANES INDEMNITY PROGRAM
WILDFIRES AND HURRICANES INDEMNITY PROGRAM WHIP Assistance: Available to eligible producers for crops, trees, bushes, and vines, which suffered a qualifying loss because of the consequences of Hurricanes
More informationSEGREGATING FERTILITY COSTS BY PHILIP E. HARRIS, ISU VISITING PROFESSOR
SEGREGATING FERTILITY COSTS BY PHILIP E. HARRIS, ISU VISITING PROFESSOR Tax rules require the purchase price of land to be allocated among the land and the various assets that are purchased with the land,
More informationCHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF APPRECIATED PROPERTY
CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF APPRECIATED PROPERTY Publication CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF APPRECIATED PROPERTY December 14, 2011 The holiday season is a particularly good time for many individuals to consider
More information11 th Biennial Parker C. Fielder Oil and Gas Tax Conference
11 th Biennial Parker C. Fielder Oil and Gas Tax Conference Like-Kind Exchanges in the Energy Sector J. Peter Baumgarten, Internal Revenue Service, Washington D.C. Todd D. Keator, Thompson & Knight LLP,
More informationNotice I. Overview and Purpose
Application of the Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) Tax to Payments Made by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Notice 2006-108 I. Overview and
More informationDistributions From Revocable Trusts and Estate Inclusion
The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Tax Journal Akron Law Journals 1995 Distributions From Revocable Trusts and Estate Inclusion Mark A. Segal Please take a moment to share how this work
More informationBASIC PARTNERSHIP TAX II SALES, DISGUISED SALES & TERMINATIONS
BASIC PARTNERSHIP TAX II SALES, DISGUISED SALES & TERMINATIONS TABLE CONTENTS PART I... 1 SALES & EXCHANGEs OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS... 1 A. General Rules Transferor/Selling Partner... 1 B. General Rules
More informationFood Crop Donation Tax Credit Guidelines
Introduction During the 2016 Session, the Virginia General Assembly enacted House Bill 1093 (2016 Acts of Assembly, Chapter 391) and Senate Bill 580 (2016 Acts of Assembly, Chapter 304), which established
More informationCHAPTER 5 SELECTING TAX ACCOUNTING PERIODS AND METHODS
TCH 3/18 CHAPTER 5 SELECTING TAX ACCOUNTING PERIODS AND METHODS Table of Contents Section Description Page 500 INTRODUCTION... 5-1 501 CHOOSING AN INITIAL TAX YEAR... 5-1.4 Selecting an Acceptable Tax
More informationArticle from: Reinsurance News. March 2014 Issue 78
Article from: Reinsurance News March 2014 Issue 78 Determining Premiums Paid For Purposes Of Applying The Premium Excise Tax To Funds Withheld Reinsurance Brion D. Graber This article first appeared in
More informationNumber: Release Date: 5/24/2002 CC:INTL:4 POSTF UILC: ; ; ; ; 6038B.00-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL February 19, 2002 Number: 200221046 Release Date: 5/24/2002 CC:INTL:4 POSTF-150593-01 UILC: 367.01-00;
More informationConverting Ordinary Income Into Capital Gains Using The Early Termination Of Private Trusts And Charitable Remainder Trusts
Converting Ordinary Income Into Capital Gains Using The Early Termination Of Private Trusts And Charitable Remainder Trusts by Jerome M. Hesch Berger Singerman, LLP. Miami, Florida jhesch@bergersingerman.com
More informationTax Accounting By James E. Salles
CBTM 4-7 3/19/03 9:58 AM Page 34 Tax Accounting By James E. Salles In alternative holdings in Commissioner v. Brookshire Brothers Holding, Inc., 1 the Fifth Circuit has sided with taxpayers on two issues
More informationPrincipal Deputy Commissioner Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224
Mr. Daniel Werfel Principal Deputy Commissioner Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20224 Washington,
More informationCitrus Notes ! 3! !!!! !!! March 2015! Vol ! Inside this Issue: "!
Citrus Notes Polk County Extension Service Hillsborough County Extension Service PO Box 9005, Drawer HS03 Bartow, FL 33831-9005 5339 County Road 579 Seffner, FL 33584-3334 (863) 519-1052, email: wcoswalt@ufl.edu
More informationINTEREST CHARGE DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL SALES CORPORATIONS (IC-DISC) Stephen A. Lee
INTEREST CHARGE DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL SALES CORPORATIONS (IC-DISC) Stephen A. Lee Lee & Desenberg, PLLC 440 Louisiana St., Ste. 2200 Houston, TX 77002 713-275-8440 March 17, 2015 Intended to encourage
More informationOptional Adjustments to Basis of Partnership Property on Transfer of Partnership Interests
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1979 Optional Adjustments to Basis of Partnership
More informationby Christopher D. Scott
Christopher D. Scott, Wilcox & Savage P.C., Norfolk, Va., discusses the theories for taxing split dollar life insurance agreements that have developed over the past fifty years. The Evolution of Taxation
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS RELATING TO PARTNERSHIP OPTIONS AND CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES January 23, 2004 Report No. 1048 NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON REVENUE RULING v2
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON REVENUE RULING 99-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL RECOMMENDATIONS...4 II. BACKGROUND...5 A. The Ruling... 5 1. Situation 1 Partner
More informationFederal Tax Principles Concerning Tax Exempt Organizations Applicable to the FCC's Proposed Broadcast Incentive Auction
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL July 14, 2015 Mr. Howard Symons Vice-Chair of the Incentive Auction Task Force Federal Communications
More informationVALUING CATASTROPHIC CITRUS LOSSES. Damian C. Adams, Richard L. Kilmer, Charles B. Moss, & Andrew Schmitz. PBTC September 2004
PBTC 04-04 PBTC 02-6 VALUING CATASTROPHIC CITRUS LOSSES By Damian C. Adams, Richard L. Kilmer, Charles B. Moss, & Andrew Schmitz PBTC 04-04 September 2004 POLICY BRIEF SERIES INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60978 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, versus Petitioner-Appellant, BROOKSHIRE BROTHERS HOLDING, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES, Respondent-Appellee.
More informationOranges, Grapefruit, Tangerines and Pummelos Grown in. Florida and Imported Grapefruit; Change of Size. AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/23/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-08424, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural
More informationTaxation Issues associated with Timber and Timberland. Larry Camp CA. RPF No April 28, 2017
Taxation Issues associated with Timber and Timberland Larry Camp CA. RPF No. 1698 April 28, 2017 DISCLAIMER Today s discussion is educational, NOT legal or accounting advice, since the facts and circumstances
More informationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION. OSU EXTENSION TAXATION PROGRAM January 2014
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Tax Bulletin OSU EXTENSION TAXATION PROGRAM January 2014 FUEL TAX CREDITS AND REFUNDS FOR FARMERS INTRODUCTION Farming can be a fuel- intensive business. Both the federal
More informationFertilizer or Nutrients Acquired with Land. By:
Fertilizer or Nutrients Acquired with Land By: Philip E. Harris Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Wisconsin-Extension and Guido van der
More informationPost-Mortem Planning Steve R. Akers
Post-Mortem Planning Steve R. Akers Bessemer Trust Dallas, Texas akers@bessemer.com Copyright 2012 by Bessemer Trust Company, N.A. All rights reserved I. PLANNING ISSUES FOR 2010 DECEDENTS A. Default Rule
More informationESTIMATED KANSAS IMPACT OF THE FEDERAL TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT
ESTIMATED KANSAS IMPACT OF THE FEDERAL TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FEBRUARY 14, 2018 Summary... 2 Individual Tax Reform... 8 Tax Rate Reform... 8 Deduction for Qualified Business
More informationThe Consequences of the Subchapter S Revision Act for Oil and Gas Investors
Tulsa Law Review Volume 19 Issue 3 Article 4 Spring 1984 The Consequences of the Subchapter S Revision Act for Oil and Gas Investors Laurie Anne Patterson Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr
More informationAll Cash D Reorganizations & Selected Issues under Section 108(i)
All Cash D Reorganizations & Selected Issues under Section 108(i) Donald W. Bakke Office of the Tax Legislative Counsel U.S. Department of Treasury Bruce A. Decker Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
More informationTreasury Decision 9347, 08/06/2007, IRC Sec(s). 6655
Treasury Decision 9347, 08/06/2007, IRC Sec(s). 6655 Estimated tax rules for corps. Headnote: IRS issued final regs explaining estimated tax rules for corps. Final regs reflect multiple law changes effected
More informationunrealized receivables (which term includes recapture of depreciation, depletion and Intangible Costs). Therefore, the tax benefit any particular
Tax Aspects THE FULL IMPLICATIONS OF FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS THAT MAY AFFECT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PARTICIPATING IN THE COMPANY ARE TOO COMPLEX AND NUMEROUS TO DESCRIBE IN THIS MEMORANDUM. THEREFORE,
More information(1) Is a loss from criminal fraud or embezzlement in a transaction entered into for
Part I Section 165. Losses. 26 CFR: 1.165-8: Theft losses. (Also: 63, 67, 68, 172, 1311, 1312, 1313, 1314, 1341) Rev. Rul. 2009-9 ISSUES (1) Is a loss from criminal fraud or embezzlement in a transaction
More informationCOD INCOME B TO ELECT, TO PARTIALLY ELECT OR NOT TO ELECT, THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS
COD INCOME B TO ELECT, TO PARTIALLY ELECT OR NOT TO ELECT, THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS I. APPLICATION OF SECTION 108 RELIEF TO PARTNERSHIPS. A. Passthrough of COD Income to Partners. Although a partnership
More information2032A TITLE 26 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
2032A Page 1734 the amount of the tax imposed by this chapter (reduced by credits allowable against such tax). 1984 Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98 369, 1023(a), added subsec. (c). Former subsec. (c) redesignated
More informationNew IRC 987 Regs and Foreign Currency Translation: Income Calculation for Qualified Business Units
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY New IRC 987 Regs and Foreign Currency Translation: Income Calculation for Qualified Business Units THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE
More informationDeath of a Member of an LLC
Louisiana Law Review Volume 57 Number 2 Winter 1997 Death of a Member of an LLC Susan Kalinka Repository Citation Susan Kalinka, Death of a Member of an LLC, 57 La. L. Rev. (1997) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol57/iss2/3
More informationCheck-the-Box Milestone
Check-the-Box Milestone By Richard C. Morris Wood & Porter San Francisco 2007 marks the 10-year anniversary of the issuance of the revolutionary check-the-box regulations. Before these regulations were
More informationINCOME TAX MANAGEMENT FOR FARMERS IN 2011
INCOME TAX MANAGEMENT FOR FARMERS IN 2011 George F. Patrick Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University DRAFT DECEMBER 2011 DRAFT 2011 version has not been peer-reviewed. Comments are welcome.
More informationTHE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS WITHIN CONSOLIDATED GROUPS. August Mark J. Silverman Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C.
PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE TAX STRATEGIES FOR CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS, SPIN-OFFS, JOINT VENTURES FINANCINGS, REORGANIZATIONS AND RESTRUCTURINGS 2001 THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS
More information2595 Dallas Parkway, Suite 420 Frisco, Texas (214) Carrying On About Carried Interests
2595 Dallas Parkway, Suite 420 Frisco, Texas 75034 (214) 984-3658 dbaucum@baucumlaw.com Carrying On About Carried Interests Dan G. Baucum Dan Baucum represents clients in tax and business planning and
More informationInvestment Credit and Recapture in Partnership Transactions
Nebraska Law Review Volume 59 Issue 1 Article 9 1980 Investment Credit and Recapture in Partnership Transactions Jim R. Titus University of Nebraska College of Law, jtitus@morristituslaw.com Follow this
More informationNET OPERATING LOSSES FINAL COPYRIGHT 2015 LGUTEF. Learning Objectives. Introduction
NET OPERATING LOSSES Steps for NOL Deduction...... 40 NOL Carried between Joint and Separate Returns...... 50 Special Issues in NOL Calculations.......... 53 Making Optimal Use of an NOL Deduction.........
More informationCharitable Gift Rules
Charitable Gift Rules Carolyn M. Osteen Carolyn M. Osteen is a consultant and former partner with Ropes & Gray in Boston. Ms. Osteen is a Fellow of The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, and
More informationBankruptcy & Workouts Committee G Reorganizations
Bankruptcy & Workouts Committee G Reorganizations January 21, 2011 Elliot Freier Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA Lisa Fuller Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C. Matt Gareau Deloitte Tax LLP,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Ronald Frump ( Frump ) is the CEO of Frump International, Inc. ( Frump Inc. ). Frump
MEMORANDUM TO: Senior Partner FROM: J.D. Team Number 22 DATE: November 12, 2007 SUBJECT: 2007 Law Student Tax Challenge Problem I. Introduction Ronald Frump ( Frump ) is the CEO of Frump International,
More informationNet Operating Losses. Presented by: Keith Altobelli, EA
Presented by: Keith Altobelli, EA Net Operating Losses Objectives In this webinar the student will learn to: Calculate an NOL Determine whether to carry an NOL back or forward To claim an NOL deduction
More informationInvoluntary Conversion of Business Assets
RTE/2016-03 Revised July 2016 Involuntary Conversion of Business Assets Introduction Guido van der Hoeven, Extension Specialist/Senior Lecturer Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, NC State
More informationTravel Expense Reimbursements. Presented by: Paula Graham, Wally Reimold, & Lori Stieber
07 19 11 Travel Expense Reimbursements Presented by: Paula Graham, Wally Reimold, & Lori Stieber Key Concepts to Determine if Excludable: Tax home The definition of away from home (overnight/sleep or rest
More informationLending in the United States by Foreign Person Giving Rise to Effectively Connected Income
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: Release Date: CC:INTL:BR5 PRENO-119800-09 Third Party Communication: None Date of Communication: Not Applicable UILC: 864.02-00 date:
More informationRecommendations to Simplify Treas. Reg (c)(3)
Recommendations to Simplify Treas. Reg. 1.731-1(c)(3) The following comments are the individual views of the members of the Section of Taxation who prepared them and do not represent the position of the
More informationPage 1 of 7 Coordinated Issue Paper All Industries - State and Local Location Tax Incentives (Effective Date: May 23, 2008) LMSB-04-0408-023 Effective Date: May 23, 2008 STATE
More informationBUSINESS DEDUCTIONS 510 Limitation on Deduction of Business Interest
BUSINESS DEDUCTIONS 510 Limitation on Deduction of Business Interest NEW LAW EXPLAINED Limitation on deduction of business interest for all taxpayers. The deduction of interest paid or accrued on a debt
More informationRevenue Ruling Losses
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Revenue Ruling 2009-9 Losses ISSUES (1) Is a loss from criminal fraud or embezzlement in a transaction entered into for profit a theft loss or a capital loss under
More informationA Detailed Analysis of 280F Depreciation Recapture for Business Aircraft
DEDICATED TO HELPING BUSINESS ACHIEVE ITS HIGHEST GOALS. A Detailed Analysis of 280F Depreciation Recapture for Business Aircraft By John B. Hoover 1 Disclaimer: This article was not prepared by or under
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. February 2010 Volume 6, Issue 1
Article from: Taxing Times February 2010 Volume 6, Issue 1 CHANGE IN BASIS OF COMPUTING RESERVES IS IT OR ISN T IT? By Peter H. Winslow and Lori J. Jones High on the list of the most frequently asked questions
More informationLTA Memo February 25, LLC s Purchases of Grain from Cooperative Members Are Not PURPIMs, IRS Concludes
Legal-Tax-Accounting Memorandum NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FARMER COOPERATIVES 50 F STREET, NW SUITE 900 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 202-626-8700 fax 202-626-8722 www.ncfc.org LTA Memo 2015-1 February 25, 2015 LLC s
More informationU.S. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 1031 TAX DEFERRED LIKE KIND EXCHANGES. This outline has been modified to reflect the recent changes in the tax law.
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 1031 TAX DEFERRED LIKE KIND EXCHANGES This outline has been modified to reflect the recent changes in the tax law. I. SECTION 1031 LIKE KIND EXCHANGE A. What is a 1031
More informationD realizes a $5,000 loss under 1001(a), a loss not recognized because of 1001(c) and 351(b)(2). Assuming that D and X Corp. do not make a 362(e)(2)(C)
Problem 2-4: This problem introduces a fairly straightforward 351 transaction. It reviews many of the concepts at work in this area. Note that, unless otherwise stated, the factual variations of the general
More informationCorporate Taxation Chapter Two: Corporate Formation
Presentation: Corporate Taxation Chapter Two: Corporate Formation Professors Wells January 21, 2015 Key Statutory Provision: 351, 357, 358, 362, 368(c), 1032, 1223(1), 1223(2), 1245(b)(3), 118, 195, 212(3),
More informationSection 168. Accelerated Cost Recovery System
Section 168. Accelerated Cost Recovery System 26 CFR 1.168(a) 1T: Modified accelerated cost recovery system (temporary). T.D. 9115 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 Depreciation
More informationPENSION & BENEFITS! T he cross-border transfer of employees can have A BNA, INC. REPORTER
A BNA, INC. PENSION & BENEFITS! REPORTER Reproduced with permission from Pension & Benefits Reporter, 36 BPR 2712, 11/24/2009. Copyright 2009 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. May 2012 Volume 8 Issue 2
Article from: Taxing Times May 2012 Volume 8 Issue 2 Recent Cases on Changes from Erroneous Accounting Methods Do They Apply to Changes in Basis of Computing Reserves? By Peter H. Winslow and Brion D.
More informationTAX PRACTICE. tax notes. Blown B Acquisitions of Foreign Targets by U.S. Public Companies. By Michael Kosnitzky, Ivan Mitev, and Keith J.
Blown B Acquisitions of Foreign Targets by U.S. Public Companies By Michael Kosnitzky, Ivan Mitev, and Keith J. Blum Michael Kosnitzky Ivan Mitev Keith J. Blum Michael Kosnitzky and Keith J. Blum are with
More informationIN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax LOUIS E. MARKS and MARIE Y. MARKS, v. Plaintiffs, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 050715D DECISION The matter is before the
More informationAGROFORESTRY IN ACTION
AGROFORESTRY IN ACTION AF1004-2007 Tax Considerations for the Establishment of Agroforestry Practices by Larry D. Godsey, Economist, University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry Agroforestry is an integrated
More information2015 CALT Tax Schools Day 2. Contact Information. Day 2 Topics 12/15/2015. Dave Repp. Paul Neiffer.
2015 CALT Tax Schools Day 2 David Repp and Paul Neiffer Contact Information Dave Repp drepp@dickinsonlaw.com Paul Neiffer Paul.neiffer@claconnect.com 509 823 2920 www.farmcpatoday.com @farmcpa Day 2 Topics
More informationSALE OF AN INTEREST BY A FOREIGN PARTNER IS REV. RUL BASED ON LAW OR ADMINISTRATIVE WISHES?
SALE OF AN INTEREST BY A FOREIGN PARTNER IS REV. RUL. 91-32 BASED ON LAW OR ADMINISTRATIVE WISHES? Authors Stanley C. Ruchelman Beate Erwin Tags Code 741 Code $751 Code 897 Code 1445 Exchange F.I.R.P.T.A.
More information