The Challenge of Cooperative Governance. Mike Higgins, Jr. Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc.
|
|
- Silas Melton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Challenge of Cooperative Governance Mike Higgins, Jr. Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc.
2 Full Disclosure: I own stock in a bank. I own part of a credit union. 2
3 3
4 No Singular Profit Mandate Maximize Return 4
5 Credit Union Dual Mandate Provide benefit to members Stay adequately capitalized Minimize ROA Maximize ROA 5
6 Context for Today s Discussion 1. Comfort Zone of Knowledge: What you know may not be what is best for members. 2. Member Focused Priorities: A member value approach to cooperative governance. 3. Board Governance Scorecard: Learn, trust and verify. 4. External Validation: How do we know if we are getting a good deal? 6
7 Comfort Zone of Knowledge
8 MONEYBALL It s unbelievable how much you don't know about the game you ve been playing all your life. -Mickey Mantle
9
10 MONEYBALL Your goal should not be to buy players. Your goal should be to buy wins. In order to win, you need to score runs. In order to score runs, you need to get on base. On Base Percentage: Walk = Hit 10
11 CUBALL Your goal should not be to extract profit from members and hoard it away as capital. Your goal should be to create value for members and be good stewards of profit taken for regulatory compliance. 11
12 HELLO My Name Is Bank in CU Clothing 12
13 HELLO My Name Is Return on Assets Profit extracted from members in current year 13
14 HELLO My Name Is Net Worth Cumulative profit extracted from members 14
15 HELLO My Name Is Asset Size Members pay asset growth tax (more assets = more net worth) 15
16 Member Focused Priorities
17 Do Good Recognize Employees (Base, Benefits, Bonus) Create Member Value (Product Mix, Productivity, Provision, Pricing) Sustain the Entity (Optimal ROA to Maintain Net Worth) 17
18 Sustain Entity Net Worth Establish target net worth range. Product Mix Productivity Provision CU Board Chair: Uh, Mike, we don t think that s something we should play a role in. Pricing 18
19 Sustain Entity Net Worth Establish target net worth range. One of the most important Product Mix cooperative decisions is how much member capital to hold. Productivity Provision Set minimum for soundness. Set maximum to avoid Pricing hoarding. 19
20 Sustain Entity Net Worth Establish minimum and optimal return on assets. Product Mix Not Enough Just Too Much ROA Right ROA Productivity Provision Pricing Minimum Optimal 10% X 5% = 0.50% % = 0.70% Target Net Worth Ratio X Asset Growth Appetite = Minimum ROA Minimum ROA + Safety Margin = Optimal ROA 20
21 Sustain Entity Net Worth Product Mix Deploy member net worth in fiduciary manner. $$$$ Weak Product Mix Mix Productivity Provision Pricing Assets $$$$ Member Investment Rate Sensitive Funds Relationship Shares Loans Non-Interest Income Income Low Strategic Value High 21
22 Sustain Entity Net Worth Product Mix Deploy member net worth in fiduciary manner. 10% Growth Weak Product Mix Mix Taking more from members and squandering it. Productivity Provision Pricing Assets 10% More Member Investment Rate Sensitive Funds Relationship Shares Loans Non-Interest Income Income Low Strategic Value High 22
23 Sustain Entity Net Worth Product Mix Deploy member net worth in fiduciary manner. 0% Growth Don t Grow (GASP!) Product -- Improve Mix Product Mix Productivity Provision Pricing Assets 0% More Member Investment Rate Sensitive Funds Relationship Shares Loans Non-Interest Income Income Low Strategic Value High 23
24 Sustain Entity Net Worth Deploy member net worth in fiduciary manner. Avoid Net Worth Tax: Product Mix 1. Generate Recurring, Value-Based Non-Interest Income 2. Grow Loans Productivity 3. Improve Funding Mix (Relationship Vs. Rate Sensitive) Provision Pay Net Worth Tax: Pricing 4. When Growing Assets Is Necessary (Lowest Priority) 24
25 Sustain Entity Net Worth Manage expense efficiently and effectively. Product Mix Net Operating Expense (Efficiently: Operating Expense minus Non-Interest Income) Productivity Provision Strategic Balance (Effectively: Loan Balance plus Regular & Draft Share Balance) Pricing The smaller the ratio, the more efficient and effective use of expense. 25
26 Sustain Entity Net Worth Manage expense efficiently and effectively. Product Mix Productivity Expense Assets Counts expense, but ignores revenue associated with income producing areas. Provision Pricing Efficiency Ratio Impacted by interest rates; driven by profit extracted from members. 26
27 Sustain Entity Net Worth Product Mix Avoid excessive credit losses. 1. Establish Net Charge-Off Tolerance 2. Determine Adequate Reserve for Losses Productivity Provision Pricing 27
28 Sustain Entity Net Worth Product Mix Provide tangible economic benefit for members. 1. Below Market Loan Yield 2. Above Market Dividend Rate Productivity 3. Superior Surplus Funds Yield Provision 4. Supplemental Dividend/Giveback Pricing Opportunity for value pricing function of product mix, productivity and provision. 28
29 Board Governance Scorecard
30 Member Focus Category Min. ROA Actual Status Sustain Entity Net Worth 9.0% Product Mix (% Assets) Loans Relationship Shares 82% 40% Non-Interest Income 1.54% Productivity Net NIE / Strategic Balance 2.08% Provision Net Charge-Offs (% Lns) Loan Loss Reserve 0.32% 1.50x NCO Loan Yield 4.69% Pricing Surplus Funds Yield 1.07% Cost of Funds 0.58% Profit (Optimal ROA) Return on Assets Asset Growth Supported 30
31 Algebra That Ties It Together Minimum ROA = Ln Asset Pct * Ln Yld + Surplus Funds Pct * Surplus Funds Yld + NII Pct Assets - (Net NIE / Strategic Bal * (Ln Asset Pct + Rel Share Pct) + NII Pct) - NCO Pct * Ln Asset Pct - Ln Growth x Ln Asset Pct x NCO Pct x LLR Mult Asset Growth Supported = ROA / Net Worth Pct 31
32 Member Focus Category Min. ROA Actual Status Sustain Entity Net Worth 9.0% Product Mix (% Assets) Loans Relationship Shares 82% 40% Changes made above line Non-Interest Income 1.54% Productivity Net NIE / Strategic Balance 2.08% Provision Net Charge-Offs (% Lns) Loan Loss Reserve 0.32% 1.50x NCO Pricing Loan Yield Surplus Funds Yield 4.69% 1.07% immediately reflected on bottom line. Cost of Funds 0.58% Profit (Optimal ROA) Return on Assets Asset Growth Supported 0.62% 6.9% 32
33 Board Governance Control Chart 33
34 Board Governance Control Chart Trend of recent performance 34
35 Board Governance Control Chart Stay Above Lower Limit 35
36 Board Governance Control Chart Stay Below Upper Limit 36
37 Board Governance Control Chart Strategic Plan 37
38 Board Governance Control Chart Forward Focus Going to be OK? 38
39 Board Governance Framework Learn: Scorecard maintains net worth. Trust: In control; move on. Verify: Out of control; mitigation plan. 39
40 External Validation
41 Define Peer on Similar Spend Vs. (not asset size) 41
42 Define Peer on Similar Spend Normal Distribution 42
43 Similar Investment in Operations Loan Balance: More = Better Relationship Share Balance: More = Better Non-Interest Income: More = Better Credit Losses: Fewer = Better Loan Yield: Lower = Better (Reduces ROA) Surplus Funds Yield: More = Better Dividend Rate: More = Better (Reduces ROA) 43
44 Similar Investment in Operations Loan Balance: +$113m Loan Yield: -0.42% $3,414k $1,750k Net Charge-Offs: -0.18% $741k Dividend Rate: +0.16% $677k Relationship Shares: +$41m $589k Surplus Funds Yield: -0.49% Non-Interest Income: -$530k Member Value Created ($355k) ($530k) $6,286k 44
45 Recapping 1. Focus on what is best for members, not comfort zone of knowledge. 2. Establish governance targets that drive long-term sustainability of cooperative. 3. Utilize scorecard to build trust and verify results. 4. Use expense peer to answer question: Are we getting a good deal for our investment in operations? 5. Use member value created to promote credit union!!! 45
46 The Challenge of Cooperative Governance Mike Higgins, Jr. Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc.
6/6/2016. Copyright Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc. Copyright Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc.
2 1 No Singular Profit Mandate Maximize Return 3 Credit Union Dual Mandate Provide benefit to Stay adequately capitalized Minimize ROA Maximize ROA 4 2 Four Steps to Solve the Riddle 1. Guiding Philosophy:
More informationFramework for Member- Focused Decision Making Mike Higgins, Jr. Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc.
Framework for Member- Focused Decision Making Mike Higgins, Jr. Mike Higgins & Associates, Inc. 913.488.4506 @mhigginsjr 1 Agenda Objective: Collective intelligence for the common good. Good intentions,
More informationWhat Is Asset/Liability Management?
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO ASSET\LIABILITY MANAGEMENT, RISK APPETITE AND CAPITAL PLANNING David Koch President\CEO dkoch@farin.com 800-236-3724 ext. 4217 What Is Asset/Liability Management? Asset/liability management
More informationSAMPLE REPORT. Contact Center Benchmark DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Outsourced Contact Centers
h SAMPLE REPORT DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Contact Center Benchmark Outsourced Contact Centers Report Number: CC-SAMPLE-OUT-0617 Updated: June 2017 MetricNet s instantly downloadable Contact Center benchmarks
More informationMinimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk in a Single Strategy
White Paper Minimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk in a Single Strategy Matthew Van Der Weide Minimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk
More informationINSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES SUMMARY
INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES SUMMARY Specimen 2019 CP2: Actuarial Modelling Paper 2 Institute and Faculty of Actuaries TQIC Reinsurance Renewal Objective The objective of this project is to use random
More informationINVESTOR PRESENTATION
INVESTOR PRESENTATION December 2013 MGAM SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT In addition to historical facts or statements of current conditions, this presentation contains forward-looking statements that are intended
More informationSAMPLE REPORT. Contact Center Benchmark DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! In-house/Insourced Contact Centers
h SAMPLE REPORT DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Contact Center Benchmark In-house/Insourced Contact Centers Report Number: CC-SAMPLE-IN-0617 Updated: June 2017 MetricNet s instantly downloadable Contact Center benchmarks
More informationSAMPLE REPORT. Service Desk Benchmark DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Outsourced Service Desks
h SAMPLE REPORT DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Service Desk Benchmark Outsourced Service Desks Report Number: SD-SAMPLE-OUT-0617 Updated: June 2017 MetricNet s instantly downloadable Service Desk benchmarks provide
More informationAsset/Liability Management Series Session 1 Presenter: Sasha Khandoker ALM Analyst
Asset/Liability Management Series Session 1 Presenter: Sasha Khandoker ALM Analyst 1 2 1 What is ALM? Why are we asked to perform ALM? What is the goal of ALM? How can we use it? 3 Creating and managing
More informationThe use of an Economic Capital Model within an Enterprise Risk Management framework
The use of an Economic Capital Model within an Enterprise Risk Management framework David Ingram, Senior Director Standard & Poor s Ratings Services December, 2007 Copyright (c) 2006 Standard & Poor s,
More informationMaking More Informed Decisions
December 8, 2008 TRANSUNION BANKRUPTCY SCORE Making More Informed Decisions Thomas Higgins Director, Analytic Decision Services thiggins@transunion.ca 416-332-2438 National Bankruptcy Trends Consumer bankruptcies
More informationMy Big Year: How to Play
My Big Year: How to Play Welcome to My Big Year! You will take on the role of Luna, a 22-year-old recent college graduate, who is trying to juggle her first job, get into grad school, and manage her personal
More information11 Ratios Every Credit Union Professional Should Know
Want your credit union to soar above the rest? 11 Ratios Every Credit Union Professional Should Know Presented by: Deborah L. Rightmire, CCUE Vice President Asset/Liability Management Texas Credit Union
More informationECON DISCUSSION NOTES ON CONTRACT LAW-PART 2. Contracts. I.1 Investment in Performance
ECON 522 - DISCUSSION NOTES ON CONTRACT LAW-PART 2 I Contracts I.1 Investment in Performance Investment in performance is investment to reduce the probability of breach. For example, suppose I decide to
More informationHow Do You Measure Which Retirement Income Strategy Is Best?
How Do You Measure Which Retirement Income Strategy Is Best? April 19, 2016 by Michael Kitces Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those
More informationTHE SCOUTING REPORT MANAGER-OF-MANAGERS AN ANALYSIS OF GUIDESTONE S INVESTMENT APPROACH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
THE SCOUTING REPORT AN ANALYSIS OF GUIDESTONE S MANAGER-OF-MANAGERS INVESTMENT APPROACH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GuideStone offers a substantial array of traditional equity and fixed income investment options,
More informationHow to be Factor Aware
How to be Factor Aware What factors are you exposed to & how to handle exposure Melissa Brown MD Applied Research, Axioma Omer Cedar CEO, Omega Point 1 Why are we here? Case Study To Dissect the Current
More informationReference Point April 2016
April 16 T. Rowe Price Defined Contribution Plan Data As of December 31, 15 Insights The Pension Protection Act of 6 provided fiduciary cover for plans using automatic enrollment and escalation. Ten years
More informationRisk Tolerance Assessment Matching risk tolerance and time horizon to an allocation
Risk Tolerance Assessment Matching risk tolerance and time horizon to an allocation In determining the most appropriate asset allocation for your needs, there are two components that must be considered
More informationJohn and Margaret Boomer
Retirement Lifestyle Plan Includes Insurance and Estate - Using Projected Returns John and Margaret Boomer Prepared by : Sample Report June 06, 2012 Table Of Contents IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION 1-9
More informationIt s easy to get started
Client Guide It s easy to get started You and your advisor create an investor profile based on your discussions and responses to the Portfolio Select Series questionnaire. Based on the profile, you and
More informationNo duplication of transmission of the material included within except with express written permission from the author.
Copyright Option Genius LLC. All Rights Reserved No duplication of transmission of the material included within except with express written permission from the author. Be advised that all information is
More informationFirst Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call April 19, 2018
First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call April 19, 2018 WBS 1Q18 Earnings Highlights ($ in millions, except EPS data) Significant progress on our key strategic initiatives: 34 consecutive quarters of
More informationMarket and Liquidity Risk Assessment Overview. Federal Reserve System
Market and Liquidity Risk Assessment Overview Federal Reserve System Overview Inherent Risk Risk Management Composite Risk Trend 2 Market and Liquidity Risk: Inherent Risk Definition Identification Quantification
More informationTUFTS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ES 152 ENGINEERING SYSTEMS Spring Lesson 16 Introduction to Game Theory
TUFTS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ES 52 ENGINEERING SYSTEMS Spring 20 Introduction: Lesson 6 Introduction to Game Theory We will look at the basic ideas of game theory.
More informationInvestment Cost Effectiveness Analysis Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global
Investment Cost Effectiveness Analysis 2015 Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global Table of contents 1 Executive summary 2 Research 3 Peer group and universe Total cost versus benchmark cost 5-6 Benchmark
More informationFiduciary Responsibilities of the Council Executive Board
Fiduciary Responsibilities of the Council Executive Board TRAINED STAFF/ VOLUNTEERS STRONG RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FISCAL CAPACITY GOOD GOVERNANCE INTERNAL CONTROLS STRATEGIC PLANNING GOOD COMMUNICATIONS BOARD
More informationBuilding Balanced Incentive Scorecards
Building Balanced Incentive Scorecards By Christie Summervill, CEO www.balancedcomp.com Who is BalancedComp? Expert Compensation Consulting and Cloudbased Automated Systems Exclusively for financial institutions
More informationSAMPLE REPORT. Call Center Benchmark. In-house/Insourced Call Centers DATA IS NOT ACCURATE!
SAMPLE REPORT DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Call Center Benchmark In-house/Insourced Call Centers Report Number: CC-SAMPLE-IN-0116 Updated: January 2016 MetricNet s instantly downloadable Call Center benchmarks
More informationMANAGED ACCOUNT PROGRAM
MANAGED ACCOUNT PROGRAM Madison, Wisconsin State Capitol MANAGED ACCOUNT PROGRAM CLEAR AND SIMPLE THE MADISON MANAGED ACCOUNT PROGRAM Innovative strategies for the informed investor Successful investment
More informationCS188 Spring 2012 Section 4: Games
CS188 Spring 2012 Section 4: Games 1 Minimax Search In this problem, we will explore adversarial search. Consider the zero-sum game tree shown below. Trapezoids that point up, such as at the root, represent
More informationExecutive Action Report. For the month ending January 31, 2014 (and the prior thirteen months) Hello Telephone Co
Executive Action Report For the month ending January 31, 2014 (and the prior thirteen months) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 521210 Based on: Note: These reports are for discussion
More informationGuide to Retirement Plan Investing Basics
Guide to Retirement Plan Investing Basics WHAT S YOUR STRATEGY? Saving for retirement might be the most important thing you ever do with your money. When saving for retirement, you ll make some decisions
More informationAnalytic measures of credit capacity can help bankcard lenders build strategies that go beyond compliance to deliver business advantage
How Much Credit Is Too Much? Analytic measures of credit capacity can help bankcard lenders build strategies that go beyond compliance to deliver business advantage Number 35 April 2010 On a portfolio
More informationThe Ultimate 401(k) Plan Design Guide for Plan Sponsor and Advisors Why you have a 401k and how to get the most out of your 401k Plan
The Ultimate 401(k) Plan Design Guide for Plan Sponsor and Advisors Why you have a 401k and how to get the most out of your 401k Plan www.401kfiduciarynews.com Your plan design will depend on many different
More informationRetirement Plan Best Practices
Arnerich Massena 2045 NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Portland, OR 97212 503.239.0475 www.arnerichmassena.com Retirement Plan Best Practices Plan Monitoring Fourth of five-part series Arnerich Massena,
More informationDelivering Clarity to Credit Unions Through Expertise and Experience
Jeff Owen, The Rochdale Group September 2012 Delivering Clarity to Credit Unions Through Expertise and Experience Enterprise Risk Management Lending Execution and Risk Management Merger Strategy and Realization
More informationCAPTRUST Financial Advisors. Investment Policy Monitoring (Scoring) System Methodology
CAPTRUST Financial Advisors Investment Policy Monitoring (Scoring) System Methodology As of July 1, 2017 Investment Evaluation/Scoring System (previously referred to in the Appendix) The actively managed
More informationMaximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy!
Maximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy! Jessica Abramson, Natalie Collina, and William Gasarch August 2017 1 Introduction Consider a final round of Jeopardy! with players Alice and Betty 1. We assume that
More informationDUALITY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
DUALITY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Understanding Duality No learning of Linear Programming is complete unless we learn the concept of Duality in linear programming. It is impossible to separate the linear
More informationNew York. New York. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 New York New York First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMaine. Maine. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Maine Maine First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationNew York. New York. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 New York New York First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationNew York. New York. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 New York New York First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationPCA Checkup. Prepared for: XYZ Credit Union First Quarter By: CUNA's Economics & Statistics Department
PCA Checkup YOUR CUSTOMIZED ANALYSIS OF THE NCUA PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION REGULATION, FINAL RISK-BASED NET WORTH REQUIREMENT, AND NET WORTH SCENARIO ANALYSIS Prepared for: XYZ Credit Union First Quarter
More informationDerivations: LR and SR Profit Maximization
Derivations: LR and SR rofit Maximization Econ 50 - Lecture 5 February 5, 06 Consider the production function f(l, K) = L 4 K 4 This firm can purchase labor and capital at prices and r per unit; it can
More informationLouisiana. Year End Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Louisiana Year End 2016 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Informa Research Services, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative Interest
More informationMaximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy!
Maximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy! Jessica Abramson, Natalie Collina, and William Gasarch August 2017 1 Abstract Alice and Betty are going into the final round of Jeopardy. Alice knows how much money
More informationLongevity Risk - Tolerances and Appetites. CIA Pension Seminar November 5, 2012
Longevity Risk - Tolerances and Appetites CIA Pension Seminar November 5, 2012 1 Longevity Risk in perspective Each Plan is different - CAAT facts Bigger context: how does longevity risk fit? Our review
More informationLPL Financial. Investor Profile Questionnaire. Building Your Financial Foundation. Name: Address: Day phone: Evening phone: Financial advisor:
LPL Financial Name: Address: Day phone: Evening phone: Email: Financial advisor: Investor Profile Questionnaire Building Your Financial Foundation The Investor Profile Questionnaire is designed to help
More informationYear-End Mid California. California. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 California California First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationCalifornia. California. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 California California First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household.
More informationTexas. Texas. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 2018 Texas Texas First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationMid-Year California. California. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 2018 California California First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationTexas. Texas. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Texas Texas First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationFlorida. Florida. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Florida Florida First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMid-Year Texas. Texas. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 2018 Texas Texas First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationYear-End Mid Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationYear-End Mid Illinois. Illinois. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Illinois Illinois First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationYear-End Mid Virginia. Virginia. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Virginia Virginia First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More information1. better to stick. 2. better to switch. 3. or does your second choice make no difference?
The Monty Hall game Game show host Monty Hall asks you to choose one of three doors. Behind one of the doors is a new Porsche. Behind the other two doors there are goats. Monty knows what is behind each
More informationMid-Year New Mexico. New Mexico. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 New Mexico New Mexico First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationMid-Year Florida. Florida. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 2018 Florida Florida First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationPennsylvania. Pennsylvania. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household.
More informationNavigating the New Normal Enterprise Risk Management After e-risk Identification and Assessment
Navigating the New Normal Enterprise Risk Management After e-risk Identification and Assessment Agenda ERM After e-ria ERM Level Setting ERM Fundamentals So Now What? Next-Step Considerations Overview
More informationYear-End Mid Colorado. Colorado. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Colorado Colorado First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationYear-End Mid Maryland. Maryland. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Maryland Maryland First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationMichigan. Michigan. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Michigan Michigan First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMassachusetts. Massachusetts. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Massachusetts Massachusetts First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household.
More informationMid-Year Illinois. Illinois. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 2018 Illinois Illinois First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationTARGET DATE COMPASS SM EVALUATE AND SELECT TARGET DATE FUNDS WITH GREATER KNOWLEDGE AND CONFIDENCE SM
TARGET DATE COMPASS SM EVALUATE AND SELECT TARGET DATE FUNDS WITH GREATER KNOWLEDGE AND CONFIDENCE SM Helping plan sponsors navigate an increasingly complex path SELECTING A TARGET DATE FUND CAN BE ONE
More informationGeorgia. Georgia. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 Georgia Georgia First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMid-Year Michigan. Michigan. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 2018 Michigan Michigan First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationDelaware. Delaware. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Delaware Delaware First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationSouth Carolina. South Carolina. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 South Carolina South Carolina First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household.
More informationNorth Carolina. North Carolina. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 North Carolina North Carolina First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household.
More informationColorado. Colorado. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Colorado Colorado First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationYear-End Mid Louisiana. Louisiana. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Louisiana Louisiana First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationMinnesota. Minnesota. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Minnesota Minnesota First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationYear-End Mid Nevada. Nevada. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Nevada Nevada First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationArizona. Arizona. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Arizona Arizona First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMinnesota. Minnesota. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 Minnesota Minnesota First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationYear-End Mid Alaska. Alaska. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Alaska Alaska First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationIndiana. Indiana. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Indiana Indiana First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationNevada. Nevada. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Nevada Nevada First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationAlabama. Alabama. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 2018 Alabama Alabama First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationArizona. Arizona. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 Arizona Arizona First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationSouth Dakota. South Dakota. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 2018 South Dakota South Dakota First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationNew Hampshire. New Hampshire. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 2018 New Hampshire New Hampshire First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationOklahoma. Oklahoma. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Oklahoma Oklahoma First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMid-Year South Carolina. South Carolina. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 South Carolina South Carolina First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationAlaska. Alaska. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Alaska Alaska First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationYear-End Mid Hawaii. Hawaii. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Year-End Mid 2017 Hawaii Hawaii First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationIowa. Iowa. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 Iowa Iowa First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationOklahoma. Oklahoma. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 Oklahoma Oklahoma First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan
More informationMid-Year Iowa. Iowa. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Mid-Year 2017 2018 Iowa Iowa First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product Comparative
More informationHawaii. Hawaii. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
First Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 Hawaii Hawaii First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationUtah. Utah. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third-Quarter Mid Year 2017 2017 Utah Utah First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 1.9 credit union members per household. Loan Product
More informationNorth Dakota. North Dakota. First Quarter Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics
Third Mid Quarter Year 2017 2018 North Dakota North Dakota First Quarter 2017 Prepared by: CUNA Economics and Statistics Source: Datatrac, NCUA, and CUNA. (1)Assumes 2.1 credit union members per household.
More information