Latham & Watkins Employee Benefits and Compensation Practice
|
|
- Harry Ross
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Number October 2005 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Employee Benefits and Compensation Practice Employee Compensation: A Cautionary Note for Employers with Stock Option Plans... an employee may also be able to claim for loss of stock options: this loss could include loss of opportunity to participate in the scheme, loss arising from the lapse of unvested options or of vested options before they can be exercised, loss of opportunity to receive additional share-related benefits and loss of opportunity to take advantage of increases in share value. Introduction On the unfair termination of an employee s employment, the potential losses for the employee that automatically spring to mind are those of salary and bonus. However, an employee may also be able to claim for loss of stock options: this loss could include loss of opportunity to participate in the scheme, loss arising from the lapse of unvested options or of vested options before they can be exercised, loss of opportunity to receive additional share-related benefits and loss of opportunity to take advantage of increases in share value. It is worth noting that an employee may also have a contractual claim for loss of stock options, but this is a separate issue that is not discussed below. United Kingdom When an employee is dismissed for a reason that is considered at law to be unfair, that employee can bring a claim for unfair dismissal, even if there has been no breach of the employee s contract. An award for damages for unfair dismissal consists of a basic award based on age, length of service and salary per week (subject to a statutory cap) and a compensatory element. Whilst a tribunal can order re-instatement or re-engagement of the employee as a remedy for unfair dismissal, this is rare in the UK. The purpose of the compensatory award is to attempt to put the employee, so far as possible, in the position that he or she would have been in but for the unfair dismissal. The principal element of compensation will be loss of earnings, both current (between the dismissal and the date of the hearing) and future (according to the tribunal s estimate of how long the loss might continue). An employee has a duty to minimise any loss he or she has suffered (by seeking another job, for example) and any award will be decreased accordingly. As well as compensating the employee for loss of basic salary, the award will also include loss of any benefits which the employee might reasonably have expected to receive had he or she not been dismissed unfairly. Losses Under a Share Option Scheme Such benefits will often include share option schemes, which are becoming increasingly popular as part of an employee s remuneration package. It has been established (Leonard v Strathclude Buses Limited [1998] IRLR 693 CS) that compensation for loss of share-related benefits is available Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with an affiliate in the United Kingdom and Italy, where the practice is conducted through an affiliated multinational partnership. Copyright 2005 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved.
2 to employees where the loss is attributable to some action taken by the employer. In theory, the implications of compensating for such losses could be extremely wide. However, in the UK this worry for employers is tempered by a number factors. Limits on Liability It is usually possible to make the dismissal fair, provided that the employer has a good reason for the dismissal and is prepared to spend the time to follow the correct procedures to ensure that the dismissal is brought about fairly, including giving the requisite notice period and paying salary during this period or making a payment in lieu of notice (provided that there has not been gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal). Except in limited circumstances, compensation for unfair dismissal is capped at a mere 65,200 (including the basic award). In addition, the compensatory award may be reduced if a payment under a contractual claim for wrongful dismissal has been made where the two awards are in respect of the same loss. This cap is removed if the dismissal was as a result of discriminatory treatment by the employer. Another way in which the potential risk in the UK is reduced is the treatment by the courts of the issue. The case of Selective Beauty UK Ltd v Hayes (EAT 5 April 2005) establishes that, when awarding compensation for loss of a future opportunity (such as the opportunity to exercise share options and consequent loss of profit to be made from selling those shares), the tribunal will assess the damages in percentage terms based on the likelihood of the event giving rise to an actual loss materialising (i.e. the likelihood that the employee would have remained in employment long enough for options to vest) and the consequent value of the loss. The court should not approach the assessment on the balance of probabilities that the event would occur and therefore award the full damages. Finally, the regular use of compromise or severance agreements in the UK, whereby employees are paid a sum of money in return for entering a general waiver of claims agreement, also severely restricts the circumstances in which an employer might become liable to pay for loss of stock options. The UK position should therefore offer employers comfort as to their potential liability. The position in both Germany and France is quite different and it is interesting to make a brief comparison. Germany In Germany, an employee who has been unfairly dismissed will be entitled to continue to work for the employer as if he or she had never been dismissed because an unfair dismissal is an ineffective one. Any salary not paid from the dismissal up until the time of reinstatement has to be paid to the employee retrospectively. In addition, stock options that would have vested during this time will be treated as having vested and the employee will be entitled to exercise the options and receive the shares. If it is not possible for the employee to receive the shares him or herself then the employee will have a claim for damages. However, in assessing the damages, it is difficult to determine when the employee would have exercised the options and/or sold the shares. There is no precedent for this as yet and it is therefore uncertain precisely how the amount would be calculated. It seems likely that it will be based on the difference between the exercise price of the option and the current market value, on the one hand, and the market value on the proposed sale date, on the other. This could result in a considerable award and the amount of damages that an employee can receive is not capped. 2 Number October 2005
3 Fair Dismissals In Germany, dismissals can be fair if they are done for a fair reason which must be one of misconduct, personal reasons (such as poor performance or extended illness) or redundancy, and with the required notice period. However, there are further complications if a works council exists. If a court decides that a dismissal was fair, then the employment relationship will terminate and the employee will not be entitled to receive either shares or damages, provided that the stock option plan does not provide for extended vesting/execution rights. Settlement In practice, court proceedings often take a year or more, and it may be that the employee does not wish to be reinstated. In this case, a severance package may be negotiated either in court or by way of out of court settlement. The payment of stock options may be a significant issue in the negotiation of a severance payment or settlement offer as, again, damages are not capped at all. The amount payable will usually depend, to a certain extent, upon the likelihood of the employee winning or losing a claim for unfair dismissal in court. Employees may waive claims arising out of their former employment by entering into a mutual termination agreement with their former employer as part of the severance package. Thus, compensating employees for loss of stock options on an unfair dismissal can be a major concern for employers in Germany, despite the fact that the primary remedy is one of reinstatement. France When an employee is dismissed, he or she can bring a claim for unfair dismissal before the Labour Court. If the dismissal is held to be unfair by the judge, an award for damages for unfair dismissal will be made to the employee. The amount of the award is based on age, length of service and salary. The court will also review, upon the employee s request, the loss of any benefits which the employee might reasonably have expected to receive had he or she not been dismissed unfairly. As a matter of law, where the employee has at least two years continuous employment and the employer has at least 11 employees, the employee is entitled to receive a minimum of six months remuneration by way of damages if unfair dismissal is established. Whilst a court can suggest reinstatement of the employee as a remedy for unfair dismissal, the outcome of court action is more commonly an award of damages awarded to the unfairly dismissed employee. Losses Under a Share Option Scheme In France, share options have become increasingly popular since the 1990s. Most share option plans provide that option holders must still be employees of the company (or the group) in order to exercise their rights relating to share options. Therefore, employees would lose these rights once their employment agreements terminated, whatever the circumstances of such termination. Fair Dismissal The French Supreme Court initially recognized the validity of share option plans requiring option holders still to be on the payroll of the company in order for options to be exercised (Cour de cassation, 9 May 2001, no ). Less than a year later, the Supreme Court reinforced that such provisions restricting the possibility to exercise the options, could only be enforced if the employees had received prior, formal notification of these provisions. Should the employer be unable to provide evidence that he had properly informed the option holders of these conditions under the plan (i.e.: need to be on the payroll) by supplying each beneficiary with a comprehensive information 3 Number October 2005
4 memorandum and/or a copy of the plan (if required, translated into French, such condition would not be enforceable; the beneficiary would thus be entitled to damages in respect of his loss of options (Cour de cassation, 15 January 2002, no ). Even if an employee has been duly informed of the relevant conditions in the share option plan which stated that he or she was not entitled to exercise his or her share options following his or her dismissal, the employee would be entitled to compensation for the financial damage caused, if his dismissal was found by the labour court to be unfair (e.g.: Cour de cassation, 29 September 2004, n ). Therefore, where the Labour Court holds a dismissal to be unfair, the employee is entitled to damages in respect of his loss of options. Assessment of Damages Assuming the dismissal is deemed by a court to be unfair, the amount of damages payable can be difficult to assess. If the employee had not been entitled to exercise his or her option under the rules of the plan at the date of dismissal, the issue is to determine when he or she would have exercised the options and/or sold the shares, and what the market value of the shares would have been at that time. If the employee had been entitled to exercise his or her rights at the date of his or her dismissal within to the deadlines specified in the plan, so that he or she would have benefited from an immediate profit, damages can be more easily assessed, as they should be, to a large extent, based on the difference between the option price and the share s value at that date. However, this assumes that the employee would sell immediately when in reality, taxation reasons might have influenced the employee not to have resold the share immediately and therefore the complications of determining what a shares value might be at some point in the future can not be avoided. It is worth noting that damages for the loss of share options rights are not capped under French law and therefore could be extremely high. It will almost always involve the appointment of a judicial expert by the judge, which will lead to a lengthy, complicated and costly procedure. In view of the difficulty of such prospective and technical calculations, it is advisable to request the appointment of an expert to make an assessment based on all the necessary factors. Avoiding the Risk Under French law it is possible to dismiss fairly, so long as the employer has justification, abides by the relevant dismissal procedure and gives the required notice period. However, courts take a very strict approach on the justification for dismissals and it can be difficult to avoid a claim for unfair dismissal. Compromise agreements are used as an effective way of avoiding payment including of damages for loss of stock options, but these must be entered into by the parties only after the dismissal has taken place and it is advisable to refer specifically to stock options in the agreement itself to be sure of avoiding a future claim. Conclusion Whilst compensation for loss of share options can be an issue in the UK, the scope of any potential liability is quite restricted. This is in contrast to the position in Germany and France where the risk for employers is much greater, primarily because there is no cap on the damages that can be awarded to an employee. In all cases, employers should be aware of the risks that may be involved in a European context on the termination of employees contracts of employment when considering implementing a company-wide share option plan. 4 Number October 2005
5 5 Number October 2005
6 Office locations: Boston Brussels Chicago Frankfurt Hamburg Hong Kong London Los Angeles Milan Moscow New Jersey New York Northern Virginia Orange County Paris San Diego San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Washington, D.C. Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject matter be required, please contact the attorneys listed below or the attorney whom you normally consult. A complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our Web site at If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive from Latham & Watkins, please visit to subscribe to our global client mailings program. If you have any questions about this Client Alert, please contact Emma Scarratt in our London office, Stephane Henry, Matthias Rubner or Deborah Sankowicz from our Paris office, Norma Studt from our Hamburg office, or any of the following attorneys. Boston David A. Gordon Brussels Marc Hansen +32 (0) Chicago John P. Lynch Kevin A. Russell Kenneth G. Schuler Frankfurt Volker Schäfer Hamburg Stefan Lunk Hong Kong Mitchell D. Stocks London Stephen Brown Christopher Hitchins Los Angeles G. Andrew Lundberg Joel E. Krischer Milan Michael S. Immordino Moscow Anya Goldin New Jersey James E. Tyrrell New York Christopher Harris Catherine E. Palmer John D. Shyer Orange County Perry J. Viscounty Paris John P. Lynch Deborah Sankowicz +33 (0) San Diego Michael J. Weaver San Francisco Linda M. Inscoe Peter A. Wald Shanghai Rowland Cheng Silicon Valley Patrick E. Gibbs Matthew B. Lehr Singapore Mark A. Nelson Tokyo David L. Shapiro Washington, D.C. Richard P. Bress Kip C. Johnson, Jr Number October 2005
Latham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 556 December 7, 2006 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Internal Revenue Service Issues Guidance on Reporting and Withholding Under Section 409A for 2006 Notice 2006-100 is important for
More informationFinal Regulations Adopt Most Proposed Regulations
Number 591 April 16, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Final Regulations under Section 409A Important Issues for Stock Options and Other Stock Rights In general, the final regulations under
More informationLatham & Watkins Health Care Practice Group
Number 268 March 4, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Health Care Practice Group OIG Approves One ASC Joint Venture, Declines to Approve Another... ASC joint ventures that do not meet safe harbors will
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 242 December 13, 2002 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The proposed rule is designed to force textual MD&A disclosures about off-balance sheet arrangements that have not been prominently
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 348 November 21, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department However, one important provision will have immediate impact namely the provision that dictates how non-eu issuers can have
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 Affects Domestic Mergers and Acquisitions Tax Issues
Number 415 October 26, 2004 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department The Act makes certain significant reforms that relate to domestic mergers and acquisitions and will be of interest to U.S. taxpayers.
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance & Real Estate Department
Number 309 July 11, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance & Real Estate Department FERC s investigation into Enronaffiliated qualifying facilities and its broader review of its QF files may expose
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 584 April 4, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Cross-Border Financings: US Tax Authorities Target Structured Finance Arbitrage and Double Dip Losses There are three categories of
More informationThe SEC Publishes New NYSE and Nasdaq Rules Regarding Stockholder Approval of Equity Plans
NUMBER 228 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS TAX DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. 228 OCTOBER 21, 2002 Subject to certain exceptions, the proposed rules contained in both the NYSE and Nasdaq Releases will require stockholders
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 248 January 15, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Treasury Proposes New Regulations for Capitalization of M&A Costs The proposed regulations are very comprehensive and implement
More informationSEC Proposes Disclosure Rules for Critical Accounting Policies
NUMBER 202 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS CORPORATE DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. 202 JULY 3, 2002 SEC Proposes Disclosure Rules for Critical Accounting Policies This new rule would add several pages or more of textual
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 410 October 4, 2004 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department... the Act imposes additional requirements on California charitable organizations by incorporating many of the so-called corporate
More informationLatham & Watkins Greater China Practice
Number 386 August 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Greater China Practice Joint ventures are the most popular form of foreign direct investment in the PRC, not only because they were the first business
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1260 November 22, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The Limits of Control: Private Funds and the Large Trader Rule... investment advisers to private funds should consider updating
More informationClient Alert. The SEC Facilitates Foreign Private Issuer Deregistration Under the Exchange Act. Deregistering Equity Securities
Number 588 11 April 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The SEC Facilitates Foreign Private Issuer Deregistration Under the Exchange Act Rule 12h 6 will come into force on June 4, 2007,
More informationLatham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group
Number 986 February 11, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group Testing the Waters Ahead of Exchange Offers C&DI 139.29, coupled with the Staff s informal interpretation of Rules
More informationClient Alert. Number July Latham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 1375 31 July 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Spain s Tax Reform Introduces a New Special Tax Applicable to Dividends and Capital Gains Derived From Foreign Subsidiaries not Qualifying
More informationSEC Approves Amendments to Rule 15c2-12
Number 1039 June 8, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department SEC Approves Amendments to Rule 15c2-12 For issuers or obligated parties with any currently outstanding municipal securities, including
More informationClient Alert. UK Takeovers: Defined Benefit Pension Trustees Gain New Rights. The Introduction of Rules in Favour of Pension Trustees
Number 1511 30 April 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate and Tax Department UK Takeovers: Defined Benefit Pension Trustees Gain New Rights. A framework within which the takeover parties and the
More informationClient Alert. Recent Changes to CONSOB Rules on Cash Tender Offers and Exchange Offers for Debt Securities Extended into Italy
Number 1230 6 September 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Recent Changes to CONSOB Rules on Cash Tender Offers and Exchange Offers for Debt Securities Extended into Italy Recent changes
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 441 8 March 2005 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Establishment of a European Stock Corporation (Societas Europaea SE ) in Germany and Europe On December 28, 2004 the German Statute
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments
Number 912 3. August 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments The Implementation of the European Acquisitions Directive by the Regulation on Ownership Control Novelties Regarding
More informationClient Alert. Hong Kong Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear. Background
Number 1502 22 April 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear The fact that the controlling mind of a
More informationRule 155 Creates Safe Harbors for Two Common Integration Situations
NUMBER 143 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS CORPORATE DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. 143 MARCH 30, 2001 Rule 155 Creates Safe Harbors for Two Common Integration Situations The SEC adopted Rule 155 (Release No. 33-7943)
More informationLatham & Watkins Distressed Credit Markets Advisory Group
Number 842 March 26, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Distressed Credit Markets Advisory Group Federal Reserve Bank of New York Revises and Expands the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility We have
More informationLatham & Watkins Venture and Technology Practice
Number 405 September 7, 2004 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Venture and Technology Practice New Law Relating to the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data, Modifying the
More informationClient Alert. IRS Issues Final Regulations on Noncompensatory Partnership Options
Number 1471 February 19, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Issues Final Regulations on Noncompensatory Partnership Options On February 4, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released
More informationA Series of Fortunate Events
Number 973 18 January 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Changes in Regulation of Derivatives and Repo Transactions in Russia The Amendments almost by accident spawned a more general
More informationClient Alert. IRS Guidance Tightens Several Provisions Regarding Tax-Free Corporate Transactions
Number 710 June 5, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Guidance Tightens Several Provisions Regarding Tax-Free Corporate Transactions The US Treasury and IRS have tightened several rules
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1069 August 5, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department New FINRA Rule 5141 to Replace Current Papilsky Rules Relating to the Sale of Securities in Fixed Price Offerings However,
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments
Number 1204 June 20, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments After the Credit Crunch: Venture Credit Facilities at the Term Sheet Stage This Alert highlights some of the key
More informationClient Alert. IRS Relaxes Standard of Relief for Failing to File Gain Recognition Agreements. Background
Number 1464 February 6, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Relaxes Standard of Relief for Failing to File Gain Recognition Agreements The proposed regulations recognize that full gain
More informationapplicable to the rights of shareholders of listed companies, as outlined below. Scope of the Decree
Number 998 22 March 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Implementation of Directive 2007/36/CE on Shareholders Rights Directive 2007/36/ CE... introduc[es] several significant amendments
More informationTaxation of Payments Made After the Termination of Employment
Number 1168 17 March 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department A number of important taxrelated changes that will affect employers and employees in the UK will take effect from 6 April 2011. Important
More informationClient Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 544 September 27, 2006 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department SEC Staff Issues Important Practical Guidance on Stock Option Accounting Issues The practical and commonsense guidance provided
More informationWells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee v. Chukchansi Economic Development Authority, et al., Index No /2013
Robert J. Malionek Direct Dial: 212-906-1816 robert.malionek@lw.com October 15, 2013 Honorable Melvin L. Schweitzer Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York 26 Broadway New York, NY 10004
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 475 August 19, 2005 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Of particular significance to the electric power industry, the Act repeals the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935...
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department. SEC Proposes New Compensation Disclosure Rules
Number 499 January 31, 2006 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department SEC Proposes New Compensation Disclosure Rules What Companies Need to Know for the 2006 Proxy Season Although the Proposed Rules
More informationClient Alert. Amendments to the Prospectus and Transparency Directives. Summary of Key Changes
Number 1121 18 January 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Amendments to the Prospectus and Transparency Directives Wholesale debt issuers should pay particular attention to the limited
More informationClient Alert. IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations. Summary. Background
Number 1460 January 29, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations Summary The Regulations represent a significant step towards FATCA implementation, yet considerable
More informationClient Alert. UAE Funds Update: Arrival of the UAE s New Investment Funds Regulation. Summary of the Key Changes
Number 1380 9 August 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department UAE Funds Update: Arrival of the UAE s New Investment Funds Regulation The Regulation marks a significant step in the development
More informationClient Alert. Introduction. The Liquidity Practice
Number 870 27 May 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Listed Companies and Transactions Involving Their Own Shares: CONSOB Approves Two Market Practices Concerning Liquidity Transactions
More informationDerivatives Under the New Italian Takeover Bids Regulation
Number 1231 6 September 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Derivatives Under the New Italian Takeover Bids Regulation Under the new CONSOB regulation on takeover bids, derivatives
More informationClient Alert. In its Denial of a Power Plant Sale, FERC Sheds Light on the Meaning of Control and the Importance of Mitigation.
Number 1492 March 26, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department In its Denial of a Power Plant Sale, FERC Sheds Light on the Meaning of Control and the Importance of Mitigation The decision
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Publishes Guidance on Expansive New CPO and CTA Regulations
Number 1385 August 20, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The CPO-CTA Q&A attempts to clarify many of the issues that have been raised [in relation to several new expansive regulations],
More informationRooftop plants with an installed capacity lower than 1 MW.
Number 1199 6 June 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The Fourth FiT Decree Provides for a New Incentive Scheme Relating to PV Plants Entering into Operation Between June 1, 2011 and
More informationClient Alert. SEC Staff Provides New Guidance Regarding the Rule 15a-6 Registration Exemption for Foreign Broker-Dealers.
Number 1495 April 8, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department SEC Staff Provides New Guidance Regarding the Rule 15a-6 Registration Exemption for Foreign Broker-Dealers The FAQs provide
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department. By Peter L. Winik, Julia A. Hatcher and Laura H. Neuwirth
Number 642 November 2, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department A Surge of Product Recalls and Investigations Serves to Remind Companies of the Need to Comply with Product Safety Rules
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 519 June 27, 2006 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department D&O Insurance Issues Arising From Stock Options Dating and Timing Issues Any such claims should be handled with great care,
More informationClient Alert. The FCC Applies Forbearance Standard Under Section 10 of the Act; Section 251(c) Is Fully Implemented
Number 494 December 19, 2005 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department This Order is significant because it demonstrates the Commission s willingness to grant substantial deregulation to an ILEC
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate and Litigation Departments. CMS Issues Proposed Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act
Number 1266 December 19, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate and Litigation Departments CMS Issues Proposed Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act CMS estimates the average
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 681 March 4, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department US Federal Court Upholds Claims Against Subprime Lender In Accredited, the case turned on disclosure, not on the company s lending
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Proposes to Exempt Certain Energy-Related Transactions from Derivatives Regulations. Overview
Number 1402 September 20, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Proposes to Exempt Certain Energy-Related Transactions from Derivatives Regulations Overview Once these orders become
More informationClient Alert. Two Recent Decisions Highlight Pitfalls in Creating and Implementing Key Employee Incentive Plans for Executives in Bankruptcy Cases
Number 1404 September 24, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Two recent bankruptcy court decisions highlight that if a proposed insider incentive plan does not require insiders to meet
More informationDirectors and Officers Liabilities in Russia
Directors and Officers Liabilities in Russia Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the issues described in this note please contact a person mentioned below or the
More informationMiddle East Sovereign and Quasi-Sovereign Bonds in Ltd. Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Company Limited (3))
Number 915 10 August 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Assessing the Middle East Sovereign Bond Market For the first time in recent memory, Gulf countries are seeking external capital
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 546 October 16, 2006 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Recirculation and IPOs Pricing Outside of the Range There are a number of technical rules in play here and there are usually
More informationUp We Go Again Financial Threshold Increases Effective 1 July 2016
June 2016 Practice Group: Labour, Employment and Workplace Safety Up We Go Again Financial Threshold Increases Effective 1 July 2016 By Michaela Moloney and Meg Aitken What Businesses Need to Know Before
More informationDirectors duties under the Companies Act An introduction
Directors duties under the Companies Act 2006 An introduction Contents Introduction and background 4 The duties 5 Duty to promote the success of the company 6 Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Issues Proposals on the Extraterritorial Application of US Swaps Regulations. Overview
Number 1359 July 6, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Issues Proposals on the Extraterritorial Application of US Swaps Regulations The Releases set forth a complex and intertwined
More informationTaking Security in Egypt A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Egypt A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive destination
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 822 February 26, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Financial Crisis Impacts on FERC Approval Requirements For Upstream Transfers of Energy Assets The current financial crisis
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective. Swap Entity Definition Guidance
Number 1425 November 6, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective Between October 10 and October
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 614 June 29, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department New Standard for Evaluating Minimum Resale Price Agreements Under Antitrust Law The Court s opinion changes the legal landscape
More informationThe Act Amending the Right of Inquiry
The Act Amending the Right of Inquiry Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the Act amending the right of inquiry please contact a person mentioned below or the person
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 716 June 23, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices Developments in the Financial Services Industry In recent years... the enforcement of UDAP
More informationTaking Security in Uganda A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Uganda A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive destination
More informationClient Alert. CMS Announces Final Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. A. Definitions and Exclusions
Number 1469 February 18, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CMS Announces Final Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act To avoid significant penalties for non-compliance,
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 1026 May 14, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department US Sentencing Commission Approves Proposed Amendments to Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations and Expands and Clarifies
More informationContents. Introduction 4. Directors conflicts duties 4. What is a conflict? 5. Who can authorise? 6. Authorising conflicts 7
Directors conflicts of interests under the Companies Act 2006 Contents Introduction 4 Directors conflicts duties 4 What is a conflict? 5 Who can authorise? 6 Authorising conflicts 7 Practical steps for
More informationCypressEnergyPartners,L.P.
UNITEDSTATES SECURITIESANDEXCHANGECOMMISSION Washington,D.C.20549 FORM8-K CURRENTREPORT PURSUANTTOSECTION13OR15(D) OFTHESECURITIESEXCHANGEACTOF1934 DateofReport(Dateofearliesteventreported):March23,2017
More informationTaking Security in Mozambique A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Mozambique A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive
More informationTelecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support; Time Warner Cable Petition for Forbearance, WC Docket No.
Matthew A. Brill Direct: (202)637-1095 Email: matthew.brill@lw.com January 23, 2013 EX PARTE VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554
More informationClient Alert. Bankruptcy Cases Create Challenges for Real Estate Restructurings. Tribune
Number 1390 September 4, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Bankruptcy Cases Create Challenges for Real Estate Restructurings Although at this juncture it is unclear whether other jurisdictions
More informationLatham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department
Number 1212 July 7, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department US Supreme Court Declines to Expand Jurisdiction Over Foreign Products Manufacturers [F]oreign manufacturers
More informationThird Party Rights / Licence. Binding Framework. Negotiating Framework
Structures for Group Procurement Operations This pack provides an overview of various structures which can be considered when establishing a group procurement operation It assumes that the operation may
More informationShareholders' Rights in a Russian Joint-Stock Company
Shareholders' Rights in a Russian Joint-Stock Company Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the issues described in this note please contact a person mentioned below
More informationMiFID II Best execution and client order handling
2015 MiFID II Best execution and client order handling Key Points The definition of trading venue will include the new MiFID II concept of an organised trading facility A firm's obligation to take steps
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Third country access
MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 MiFID II Third country access December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points MiFID II will allow third country (i.e. non-eu) firms to provide cross-border services in
More informationSEC adopts requirement for disclosure of hedging policies for employees, officers, and directors
SEC Update January 24, 2019 This is a commercial communication from Hogan Lovells. See note below. SEC adopts requirement for disclosure of hedging policies for employees, officers, and directors On December
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1300 March 2, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Final CFTC Rules Maintain Limited Trading Exemptions But May Require Many More Investment Advisers to Investment Funds to Register
More information2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES. Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016
2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP SECTION 01 WHAT WE WILL COVER Agenda Description of Correction Principles
More informationA New Frontier Amendments to the Listing Rules, Prospectus Rules and Disclosure and Transparency Rules
A New Frontier Amendments to the Listing Rules, Prospectus Rules and Disclosure and Transparency Rules Feedback on FSA Consultation Paper 12/2 as set out in FSA Consultation Paper 12/25 October 2012 1
More informationTaking Security in Ghana A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Ghana A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive destination
More informationMiFID II 18 January MiFID II
MiFID II 18 January 2017 1 MiFID II Suitability December 2016 MiFID II 18 January 2017 1 Key Points A specific requirement to take the client's ability to bear losses and risk tolerance into account when
More informationMiFID II. Inducements. Key Points
MiFID II Inducements Key Points There will be further guidance on the meaning of the phrase "designed to enhance the quality of the service" (which is a pre-requisite for an inducement to be permitted
More informationM&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS
M&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS Daniel Nelson, Partner Casey August, Partner February 12, 2019 2019 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Introductory Notes Focus on domestic transactions Cross-border
More informationAIFMD 2014 Update private placements: where did we end up, and where are we going?
SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 INVESTMENT FUNDS UPDATE AIFMD 2014 Update private placements: where did we end up, and where are we going? Introduction The European Union Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
More informationFirms will be required to appoint a single officer with specific responsibility for client assets
MiFID II Safeguarding of client assets Key Points Firms will be required to appoint a single officer with specific responsibility for client assets Title transfer collateral arrangements ("TTCAs") will
More informationTAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS
MORGAN LEWIS 2018 M&A ACADEMY PRESENTS: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS Daniel Nelson, Partner Casey August, Partner March 6, 2018 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Introductory Notes Focus on domestic transactions
More informationZürich, October 22, Yannis Samothrakis
Supervisory laws and European cross-border issues after the implementation of the reinsurance directive: the case of France Presentation to AIDA Working Group on State Supervision Zürich, October 22, 2009
More informationArbitrability of IP Disputes in Russia
Arbitrability of IP Disputes in Russia Date Natalia Gulyaeva Partner, Head of IP, Media and Technology Practice CIS IP Arbitration Pros? When does IP arbitration make sense? disputes related to IP license
More informationNew listing regime proposals for emerging and innovative companies
New listing regime proposals for emerging and innovative companies March 2018 New listing regime proposals for emerging and innovative companies March 2018 1 New listing regime proposals for emerging and
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II
MiFID II 31 December 2016 2 MiFID II Safeguarding of client assets December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points Firms will be required to appoint a single officer with specific responsibility for
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate & Litigation Departments
Number 667 January 16, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Litigation Departments SEC Accepts Financial Statements From Foreign Private Issuers Without Reconciliation to US GAAP If Prepared
More informationImportance of the amendment to the Public Procurement Law for the expenditure of EU funds
August 2016 Practice Group(s): Government Contracts & Procurement Policy Piotr Kunicki, PhD, legal counsel in the Public Procurement Practice of K&L Gates Piotr Kunicki has been specializing in public
More informationERISA Fiduciary Issues for Plan Sponsors: What Do 401(k) Plan Fiduciaries Need to Know About Revenue Sharing?
October 2016 Practice Group: Employee Benefits ERISA Fiduciary Issues for Plan Sponsors: What Do 401(k) Plan Fiduciaries Need to Know About Revenue Sharing? By Michael A. Hart Retirement plan revenue sharing
More informationEnglish High Court Limits Scope of Privilege for Documents Generated During the Course of Internal Investigations
JUNE 1, 2017 SIDLEY UPDATE English High Court Limits Scope of Privilege for Documents Generated During the Course of Internal Investigations On May 8, the English High Court 1 struck down the majority
More informationHIPAA s New Rules: Expanding Scope, Clarifying Uncertainties, and Reinforcing Fundamentals
February 25, 2013 Practice Group: Health Care HIPAA s New Rules: Expanding Scope, Clarifying Uncertainties, and Reinforcing Fundamentals By Patricia C. Shea On January 25, 2013, the Secretary for the United
More informationTake Notice of This Change: Supreme Court Adopts Recommended Amendments to Bankruptcy Notice of Payment Change Rule
19 May 2016 Practice Groups: Restructuring & Insolvency Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Take Notice of This Change: Supreme Court Adopts Recommended Amendments to Bankruptcy Notice of Payment
More information