Latham & Watkins Corporate Department
|
|
- Alaina Wheeler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Number 1069 August 5, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department New FINRA Rule 5141 to Replace Current Papilsky Rules Relating to the Sale of Securities in Fixed Price Offerings However, in addition to modifying policies and procedures to reflect the provisions of the new rule and the elimination of certain of the requirements of the old Papilsky Rules, members should also be reviewing their underwriting agreements and related documents to make appropriate changes. On July 21, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved a proposal by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA and formerly, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or NASD) to delete current NASD Rules 2730, 2740 and 2750 (commonly known as the Papilsky Rules) and adopt in their stead new FINRA Rule NASD Rule 0120(h), which defines the term fixed price offering for purposes of the Papilsky Rules, and associated NASD interpretive materials set forth in IM-2730, IM-2740 and IM-2750 are also being eliminated in connection with the adoption of FINRA Rule FINRA has not yet indicated the effective date for the new rule. Background The stated purpose of the Papilsky Rules was to protect the integrity of fixed price offerings by ensuring that securities in such offerings are sold to the public at the stated public offering price or prices, thereby preventing an undisclosed better price. 3 The Papilsky Rules were designed to prevent FINRA members from discounting the price of securities sold in a fixed price offering below the stated public offering price or prices. In particular, the Papilsky Rules provided that: FINRA members who purchase or arrange for the purchase of securities taken in trade in a fixed price offering must purchase (or arrange for the purchase of) the securities taken in trade at a fair market price at the time of purchase. (NASD Rule 2730). 4 FINRA members may not grant any selling concessions, discounts or other allowances in connection with a fixed price offering to anyone other than a broker or dealer that is participating in the distribution of the offering. (NASD Rule 2740). 5 FINRA members may not retain securities sold in a fixed price offering for their own accounts or sell such securities to certain of their affiliates or related persons unless the member has made a bona fide offering of the securities to the public and has been unable to sell the securities in such offering at the stated fixed price. (NASD Rule 2750). 6 New FINRA Rule 5141 FINRA Rule 5141 will replace certain outdated requirements of the Papilsky Rules and simplify their provisions while still preserving the primary purpose of the original rules (i.e., protecting Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Singapore and an affiliated partnership conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan. Latham & Watkins practices in Saudi Arabia in association with the Law Office of Mohammed Al-Sheikh. Under New York s Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all inquiries regarding our conduct under New York s Disciplinary Rules to Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY , Phone: Copyright 2010 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved.
2 the integrity of the fixed price offering process). Specifically, as approved by the SEC, FINRA Rule 5141 provides that no FINRA member that: participates in a selling syndicate or selling group or that acts as the single underwriter in connection with a fixed price offering shall offer or grant, directly or indirectly, to any person or account that is not a member of such selling syndicate or selling group or that is a person or account other than the single underwriter any securities in the offering at a price below the stated public offering price (reduced price). 7 FINRA Rule 5141(b) states, however, that this general prohibition will not impact the ability of members of a selling syndicate or selling group to purchase and sell securities in the offering among themselves. Moreover, dispensing with the prohibition currently contained in NASD Rule 2750, new FINRA Rule 5141 expressly permits (subject to the restrictions contained in FINRA Rule 5130) 8 a single underwriter or member of the selling syndicate or selling group to sell securities in the offering to an affiliated person so long as the affiliated person purchases the securities at the fixed public offering price and not at a reduced price. 9 Supplementary material provided in respect of FINRA Rule 5141 clarifies that the term reduced price includes, without limitation, the offer or grant of any selling concession, discount or other allowance, credit, rebate, reduction of any fee (including any advisory or service fee), any sale of products or services at prices below reasonable commercially available rates for similar products and services... or any purchase of or arrangement to purchase securities from the person or account at more than their fair market price in exchange for securities in the offering. 10 The new rule continues to provide an exception with respect to the provision of research. In particular, FINRA Rule 5141 will not prevent a member from selling securities in a fixed price offering to a person or account to which it has provided research so long as the recipient of the research pays the stated public offering price for the securities and the research is provided pursuant to the requirements of Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of The new rule also provides guidance to FINRA members that also serve as investment advisers, noting that such a member may exempt securities that are purchased as part of a fixed price offering from the calculation of annual or periodic asset-based fees that such member charges to a customer, provided such exemption is part of the member s normal and ordinary course of business with the customer and is not in connection with an offering. 12 Although the new rule does not address the alternative practice employed by certain participating members whereby two fixed public offering prices are disclosed one price that includes the full underwriting discount and a second price that excludes all or a portion of the underwriting discount and is applicable to those purchasers who already pay asset-based fees to the selling member it would appear that this alternative practice should also continue to be permitted under the new rule provided the multiple fixed prices are adequately disclosed in the prospectus or other offering document. Practical Impact of the Rule Change FINRA has not yet indicated the implementation date for new FINRA Rule However, in addition to modifying policies and procedures to reflect the provisions of the new rule and the elimination of certain of the requirements of the old Papilsky Rules, 2 Number 1069 August 5, 2010
3 members should also be reviewing their underwriting agreements and related documents to make appropriate changes. Significantly, unlike NASD Rule 2740(c), FINRA Rule 5141 does not require members to obtain the written agreement of non-us broker-dealers participating in a fixed price offering to comply with the provisions of the Papilsky Rules and NASD Rule FINRA Rule 5141 also does not require members to make quarterly filings with FINRA with respect to designated sales, nor does it require specific records to be kept and maintained by members that are designated by their customers to receive selling credit as now required by NASD Rule 2740 (although FINRA does note that such members remain subject to other applicable FINRA and SEC recordkeeping requirements). 14 Moreover, new FINRA Rule 5141 may permit the establishment of certain referral and advisory arrangements previously thought to be prohibited by the literal words of current NASD Rule In particular, outside the parameters of an interpretive letter issued by FINRA (then NASD) staff in 2003, 15 most referral and advisory arrangements between a FINRA member that was participating in a fixed price offering and another entity that was not itself a broker-dealer that was also participating in the offering were thought to be impermissible under NASD Rule 2740 since the arrangement, if it involved the payment of compensation based on or tied to the amount of compensation received by the FINRA member in the fixed price offering, could be viewed as the grant (or sharing) of a concession or other allowance in connection with the fixed price offering. It now appears, however, that such an arrangement would not be prohibited by new FINRA Rule 5141, provided it does not, directly or indirectly, confer a reduced price in respect of any securities purchased or sold in the offering, and, accordingly, should be permissible to the extent the terms of the arrangement are not inconsistent with NASD Rule 2420 (or, assuming it is ultimately adopted, proposed FINRA Rule 2040) or any other applicable laws, rules and regulations. Finally, it is worth noting that new FINRA Rule 5141 provides that the prohibition with respect to selling the offered securities at a reduced price applies only until the termination of the offering or until a member, having made a bona fide public offering of the securities, is unable to continue selling such securities at the stated public offering price. 16 This language should preserve the ability of underwriters to change the initial offering price shown on the cover of the prospectus from time to time if they are unable to sell all the offered securities at such initial fixed offering price and, in connection with under-subscribed offerings, should continue to permit underwriters to place securities they are unable to sell to the public in the offering in an investment account or with an affiliate without running afoul of the rule. 17 Accordingly, new FINRA Rule 5141 should not change customary practices in connection with sticky deals. 3 Number 1069 August 5, 2010
4 Endnotes 1 See SEC Release No ; File No. SR-FINRA (July 21, 2010). NASD Rules 2730, 2740 and 2750 are generally referred to as the Papilsky Rules because of the court decision with which they are often associated, Papilsky v. Berndt, Fed. Sec. L. Rep (CCH) 95,627 (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 1976). FINRA issued a notice to its members relating to the proposed rule on August 4, 2009 and originally submitted the rule proposal to the SEC shortly thereafter, but then withdrew it for technical reasons in November The proposed rule was re-submitted to the SEC, without substantive change, on May 27, See FINRA Regulatory Notice (August 2009) (FINRA Notice 09-45); SEC Release No (June 16, 2010) (the Proposing Release). 2 The definition of fixed price offering is now set forth in the supplementary materials to FINRA Rule 5141 and is essentially unchanged from the definition currently set forth in NASD Rule 0120(h). As so defined, the term fixed price offering refers to securities publicly offered (in whole or in part) in the United States at a stated offering price or prices. See FINRA Rule The term includes offerings registered in the United States under the Securities Act of 1933, as well as offerings that, although public, are not required to be registered under the Securities Act pursuant to an applicable exemption (e.g., bank securities offered pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act). The term, however, does not include offerings of securities that are privately placed or offered and sold pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. It is also important to note that the term fixed price offering does not prohibit multiple price offerings so long as the different fixed prices are adequately disclosed. See Proposing Release; NASD Notice to Members FINRA Notice NASD Rule 2730 was intended to prevent members from paying a higher price for the securities taken in trade, thereby lowering the purchase price of the securities purchased by the investor in the fixed price offering. 5 The purpose of NASD Rule 2740 was to prevent members from granting discounts to favored investors, such that those investors would be able to purchase securities in the offering at a lower price than other investors. 6 NASD Rule 2750 was intended to prevent purchasers from obtaining a discount through the establishment of an affiliated broker-dealer that would receive designated selling credit for the sale. 7 FINRA Rule 5141(a). 8 FINRA Rule 5130 generally prohibits FINRA members from selling equity securities offered in initial public offerings to certain restricted persons (a term which includes, among others, broker-dealers and certain persons having a beneficial interest in a broker-dealer). 9 FINRA Rule provides that ordinary course transactions between a member and its affiliates that are unrelated to the purchase or sale of securities in a fixed price offering will not be deemed to confer a reduced price under the rule. 10 FINRA Rule FINRA Rule FINRA Rule The adoption of FINRA Rule 5141 does not impact existing NASD Rule 2420 (Dealing with Non-Members), although such rule is the subject of another pending FINRA rule proposal. See FINRA Regulatory Notice (December 2009) (proposing, among other things, to delete current NASD Rule 2420 and replace it with new FINRA Rule 2040) (FINRA Notice 09-69). Also note that current NASD Rule 2420(c) continues to require an agreement by any non-us broker-dealer that receives a selling concession, discount or other allowance from a FINRA member to agree to the restrictions set forth in the rule as if it were itself a FINRA member in respect of any sales of securities it makes to persons in the United States. The FINRA proposal discussed in FINRA Notice would eliminate this requirement and further simplify the provisions of existing NASD Rule In particular, if adopted as proposed, new FINRA Rule 2040 would (in pertinent part) prohibit members from, directly or indirectly, paying or offering to pay any compensation, fees, concessions, discounts, commissions or other allowances to... any person that is not registered as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act but, by reason of receipt of any such payments, is required to be so registered under applicable federal securities laws and [Exchange Act] rules, regulations and published guidance issued by the SEC or its staff in the form of releases, no-action letters or interpretations. See FINRA Notice Number 1069 August 5, 2010
5 14 See, e.g., Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the Exchange Act. 15 See Interpretive Letter to Dana Fleischman issued November 24, 2003 (permitting certain types of advisory and/or referral payments to non-participating broker-dealers under certain circumstances) available at Industry/Regulation/Guidance/InterpretiveLetters/ P FINRA Rule 5141(a). Similar to current NASD Rule 2750(d), securities offered for sale in a fixed price offering are presumed salable for purposes of FINRA Rule 5141 if the securities immediately trade in the secondary market at a price or prices which are above the stated public offering price. Note, however, that under NASD Rule 2750, the presumption as to the failure to make a bona fide public offering is triggered if the securities trade immediately in the secondary market at or above the public offering price. See NASD Rule 2750(d). 17 In this context, however, FINRA notes that the appropriateness of placing unsold shares in a member s investment account, and the subsequent resale of the shares, raises other potential issues under the federal securities laws or other FINRA rules and is beyond the scope of the proposed rule change. See Proposing Release. 5 Number 1069 August 5, 2010
6 If you have any questions about this Client Alert, please contact Dana G. Fleischman or any of the Latham attorneys with whom you normally consult. Dana G. Fleischman New York Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject matter be required, please contact the attorney with whom you normally consult. A complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our website at If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive from Latham & Watkins, please visit to subscribe to our global client mailings program. Abu Dhabi Barcelona Beijing Brussels Chicago Doha Dubai Frankfurt Hamburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Milan Moscow Munich New Jersey New York Orange County Paris Riyadh* Rome San Diego San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Washington, D.C. * In association with the Law Office of Mohammed A. Al-Sheikh 6 Number 1069 August 5, 2010
Latham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1260 November 22, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The Limits of Control: Private Funds and the Large Trader Rule... investment advisers to private funds should consider updating
More informationSEC Approves Amendments to Rule 15c2-12
Number 1039 June 8, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department SEC Approves Amendments to Rule 15c2-12 For issuers or obligated parties with any currently outstanding municipal securities, including
More informationClient Alert. Recent Changes to CONSOB Rules on Cash Tender Offers and Exchange Offers for Debt Securities Extended into Italy
Number 1230 6 September 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Recent Changes to CONSOB Rules on Cash Tender Offers and Exchange Offers for Debt Securities Extended into Italy Recent changes
More informationClient Alert. SEC Staff Provides New Guidance Regarding the Rule 15a-6 Registration Exemption for Foreign Broker-Dealers.
Number 1495 April 8, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department SEC Staff Provides New Guidance Regarding the Rule 15a-6 Registration Exemption for Foreign Broker-Dealers The FAQs provide
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Publishes Guidance on Expansive New CPO and CTA Regulations
Number 1385 August 20, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The CPO-CTA Q&A attempts to clarify many of the issues that have been raised [in relation to several new expansive regulations],
More informationClient Alert. Amendments to the Prospectus and Transparency Directives. Summary of Key Changes
Number 1121 18 January 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Amendments to the Prospectus and Transparency Directives Wholesale debt issuers should pay particular attention to the limited
More informationLatham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group
Number 986 February 11, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group Testing the Waters Ahead of Exchange Offers C&DI 139.29, coupled with the Staff s informal interpretation of Rules
More informationapplicable to the rights of shareholders of listed companies, as outlined below. Scope of the Decree
Number 998 22 March 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Implementation of Directive 2007/36/CE on Shareholders Rights Directive 2007/36/ CE... introduc[es] several significant amendments
More informationClient Alert. IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations. Summary. Background
Number 1460 January 29, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations Summary The Regulations represent a significant step towards FATCA implementation, yet considerable
More informationA Series of Fortunate Events
Number 973 18 January 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Changes in Regulation of Derivatives and Repo Transactions in Russia The Amendments almost by accident spawned a more general
More informationClient Alert. UK Takeovers: Defined Benefit Pension Trustees Gain New Rights. The Introduction of Rules in Favour of Pension Trustees
Number 1511 30 April 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate and Tax Department UK Takeovers: Defined Benefit Pension Trustees Gain New Rights. A framework within which the takeover parties and the
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate and Litigation Departments. CMS Issues Proposed Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act
Number 1266 December 19, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate and Litigation Departments CMS Issues Proposed Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act CMS estimates the average
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments
Number 1204 June 20, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments After the Credit Crunch: Venture Credit Facilities at the Term Sheet Stage This Alert highlights some of the key
More informationDerivatives Under the New Italian Takeover Bids Regulation
Number 1231 6 September 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Derivatives Under the New Italian Takeover Bids Regulation Under the new CONSOB regulation on takeover bids, derivatives
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Proposes to Exempt Certain Energy-Related Transactions from Derivatives Regulations. Overview
Number 1402 September 20, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Proposes to Exempt Certain Energy-Related Transactions from Derivatives Regulations Overview Once these orders become
More informationClient Alert. UAE Funds Update: Arrival of the UAE s New Investment Funds Regulation. Summary of the Key Changes
Number 1380 9 August 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department UAE Funds Update: Arrival of the UAE s New Investment Funds Regulation The Regulation marks a significant step in the development
More informationClient Alert. Number July Latham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 1375 31 July 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Spain s Tax Reform Introduces a New Special Tax Applicable to Dividends and Capital Gains Derived From Foreign Subsidiaries not Qualifying
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1300 March 2, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Final CFTC Rules Maintain Limited Trading Exemptions But May Require Many More Investment Advisers to Investment Funds to Register
More informationClient Alert. IRS Issues Final Regulations on Noncompensatory Partnership Options
Number 1471 February 19, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Issues Final Regulations on Noncompensatory Partnership Options On February 4, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released
More informationClient Alert. Hong Kong Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear. Background
Number 1502 22 April 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear The fact that the controlling mind of a
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Issues Proposals on the Extraterritorial Application of US Swaps Regulations. Overview
Number 1359 July 6, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Issues Proposals on the Extraterritorial Application of US Swaps Regulations The Releases set forth a complex and intertwined
More informationClient Alert. In its Denial of a Power Plant Sale, FERC Sheds Light on the Meaning of Control and the Importance of Mitigation.
Number 1492 March 26, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department In its Denial of a Power Plant Sale, FERC Sheds Light on the Meaning of Control and the Importance of Mitigation The decision
More informationRooftop plants with an installed capacity lower than 1 MW.
Number 1199 6 June 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The Fourth FiT Decree Provides for a New Incentive Scheme Relating to PV Plants Entering into Operation Between June 1, 2011 and
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective. Swap Entity Definition Guidance
Number 1425 November 6, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective Between October 10 and October
More informationWells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee v. Chukchansi Economic Development Authority, et al., Index No /2013
Robert J. Malionek Direct Dial: 212-906-1816 robert.malionek@lw.com October 15, 2013 Honorable Melvin L. Schweitzer Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York 26 Broadway New York, NY 10004
More informationClient Alert. IRS Relaxes Standard of Relief for Failing to File Gain Recognition Agreements. Background
Number 1464 February 6, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Relaxes Standard of Relief for Failing to File Gain Recognition Agreements The proposed regulations recognize that full gain
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments
Number 912 3. August 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Finance Departments The Implementation of the European Acquisitions Directive by the Regulation on Ownership Control Novelties Regarding
More informationLatham & Watkins Distressed Credit Markets Advisory Group
Number 842 March 26, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Distressed Credit Markets Advisory Group Federal Reserve Bank of New York Revises and Expands the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility We have
More informationClient Alert. Introduction. The Liquidity Practice
Number 870 27 May 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Listed Companies and Transactions Involving Their Own Shares: CONSOB Approves Two Market Practices Concerning Liquidity Transactions
More informationClient Alert. CMS Announces Final Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. A. Definitions and Exclusions
Number 1469 February 18, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CMS Announces Final Regulations Interpreting the Physician Payment Sunshine Act To avoid significant penalties for non-compliance,
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 1026 May 14, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department US Sentencing Commission Approves Proposed Amendments to Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations and Expands and Clarifies
More informationClient Alert. IRS Guidance Tightens Several Provisions Regarding Tax-Free Corporate Transactions
Number 710 June 5, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Guidance Tightens Several Provisions Regarding Tax-Free Corporate Transactions The US Treasury and IRS have tightened several rules
More informationFinal Regulations Adopt Most Proposed Regulations
Number 591 April 16, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Final Regulations under Section 409A Important Issues for Stock Options and Other Stock Rights In general, the final regulations under
More informationClient Alert. The JOBS Act After Two Weeks: The 50 Most Frequently Asked Questions. Determining EGC Status JOBS Act Section 101
Number 1326 April 23, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Capital Markets Group In this Client Alert, we will provide you with answers to the most frequently asked questions raised by the JOBS Act. The
More informationClient Alert. Two Recent Decisions Highlight Pitfalls in Creating and Implementing Key Employee Incentive Plans for Executives in Bankruptcy Cases
Number 1404 September 24, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Two recent bankruptcy court decisions highlight that if a proposed insider incentive plan does not require insiders to meet
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 584 April 4, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Cross-Border Financings: US Tax Authorities Target Structured Finance Arbitrage and Double Dip Losses There are three categories of
More informationMiddle East Sovereign and Quasi-Sovereign Bonds in Ltd. Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Company Limited (3))
Number 915 10 August 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Assessing the Middle East Sovereign Bond Market For the first time in recent memory, Gulf countries are seeking external capital
More informationCypressEnergyPartners,L.P.
UNITEDSTATES SECURITIESANDEXCHANGECOMMISSION Washington,D.C.20549 FORM8-K CURRENTREPORT PURSUANTTOSECTION13OR15(D) OFTHESECURITIESEXCHANGEACTOF1934 DateofReport(Dateofearliesteventreported):March23,2017
More informationDescription. Contact Information. Signature. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C Form 19b-4. Page 1 of 69. File No.
OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0045 Expires: August 31, 2011 Estimated average burden hours per response...38 Page 1 of 69 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 19b-4 File No. SR
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 Affects Domestic Mergers and Acquisitions Tax Issues
Number 415 October 26, 2004 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department The Act makes certain significant reforms that relate to domestic mergers and acquisitions and will be of interest to U.S. taxpayers.
More informationClient Alert. CFTC and SEC Issue Final Rule Defining Certain Swap Products and Triggering Several Dodd-Frank Obligations Relating to Swaps.
Number 1396 September 19, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC and SEC Issue Final Rule Defining Certain Swap Products and Triggering Several Dodd-Frank Obligations Relating to
More informationThe SEC Publishes New NYSE and Nasdaq Rules Regarding Stockholder Approval of Equity Plans
NUMBER 228 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS TAX DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. 228 OCTOBER 21, 2002 Subject to certain exceptions, the proposed rules contained in both the NYSE and Nasdaq Releases will require stockholders
More informationLatham & Watkins Health Care Practice Group
Number 268 March 4, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Health Care Practice Group OIG Approves One ASC Joint Venture, Declines to Approve Another... ASC joint ventures that do not meet safe harbors will
More informationTaxation of Payments Made After the Termination of Employment
Number 1168 17 March 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department A number of important taxrelated changes that will affect employers and employees in the UK will take effect from 6 April 2011. Important
More informationClient Alert. Bankruptcy Cases Create Challenges for Real Estate Restructurings. Tribune
Number 1390 September 4, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Bankruptcy Cases Create Challenges for Real Estate Restructurings Although at this juncture it is unclear whether other jurisdictions
More informationIs the SEC s Proposed Best Interest Standard for Broker- Dealers in Anyone s Best Interest?
Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Industry Group May 16, 2018 Number 2323 Is the SEC s Proposed Best Interest Standard for Broker- Dealers in Anyone s Best Interest? Proposal seeks to clarify and
More informationLatham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department
Number 1212 July 7, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department US Supreme Court Declines to Expand Jurisdiction Over Foreign Products Manufacturers [F]oreign manufacturers
More informationTreasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments
Latham & Watkins Tax Practice October 26, 2016 Number 2023 Treasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments Seeking to curb excessive use of related-party debt, Treasury
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 556 December 7, 2006 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Internal Revenue Service Issues Guidance on Reporting and Withholding Under Section 409A for 2006 Notice 2006-100 is important for
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 822 February 26, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Financial Crisis Impacts on FERC Approval Requirements For Upstream Transfers of Energy Assets The current financial crisis
More informationThe Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield
Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Regulatory Practice Number 1614 November 22, 2013 The Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield While the final rule narrows the scope and reach of
More informationLatham & Watkins Greater China Practice
Number 386 August 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Greater China Practice Joint ventures are the most popular form of foreign direct investment in the PRC, not only because they were the first business
More informationKey issues. Client memorandum. February CFTC Exemptions 1
CFTC Exemptions 1 Client memorandum February 2012 CFTC Significantly Limits the Exemption from Commodity Pool Operator Registration for Registered Investment Advisers and Rescinds the Registration Exemptions
More informationTaking Security in Egypt A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Egypt A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive destination
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 941 October 1, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Merger Arbitrage, Beneficial Ownership Reporting and Proxy Contests: Reflections on the Commission s Perry Order The Perry
More informationCompliance Deadline Approaches for Leveraged Lending Final Guidance
Latham & Watkins Number 1516 May 13, 2013 Corporate Department Compliance Deadline Approaches for Leveraged Lending Final Guidance The Final Guidance does not represent a fundamental deviation from the
More informationTelecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support; Time Warner Cable Petition for Forbearance, WC Docket No.
Matthew A. Brill Direct: (202)637-1095 Email: matthew.brill@lw.com January 23, 2013 EX PARTE VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554
More informationESMA Publishes Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Cross-border Application of EMIR
Latham & Watkins Derivatives Practice Number 1568 July 25, 2013 ESMA Publishes Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Cross-border Application of Parties engaged in derivative contracts should review
More informationClient Alert. UK Bribery Act 2010 Analysis of the Guidance on Adequate Procedures and the SFO Prosecution Guidance. Introduction.
Number 1181 3 May 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department The guidance will provide significant assistance, albeit at a high-level, when assessing procedures which organisations can put
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 348 November 21, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department However, one important provision will have immediate impact namely the provision that dictates how non-eu issuers can have
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 248 January 15, 2003 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Treasury Proposes New Regulations for Capitalization of M&A Costs The proposed regulations are very comprehensive and implement
More informationTaking Security in Uganda A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Uganda A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive destination
More informationRule 155 Creates Safe Harbors for Two Common Integration Situations
NUMBER 143 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS CORPORATE DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. 143 MARCH 30, 2001 Rule 155 Creates Safe Harbors for Two Common Integration Situations The SEC adopted Rule 155 (Release No. 33-7943)
More informationShareholders' Rights in a Russian Joint-Stock Company
Shareholders' Rights in a Russian Joint-Stock Company Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the issues described in this note please contact a person mentioned below
More informationFollowing the BEAT: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Application of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax
Latham & Watkins Transactional Tax Practice January 14, 2019 Number 2433 Following the BEAT: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Application of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax The proposed regulations provide
More informationFirms will be required to appoint a single officer with specific responsibility for client assets
MiFID II Safeguarding of client assets Key Points Firms will be required to appoint a single officer with specific responsibility for client assets Title transfer collateral arrangements ("TTCAs") will
More informationThe Act Amending the Right of Inquiry
The Act Amending the Right of Inquiry Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the Act amending the right of inquiry please contact a person mentioned below or the person
More informationTaking Security in Mozambique A Comparative Guide for Investors
Taking Security in Mozambique A Comparative Guide for Investors ABOUT THIS GUIDE In light of Africa s sustained economic growth over the last decade, the continent has become an increasingly attractive
More informationMiFID II. Inducements. Key Points
MiFID II Inducements Key Points There will be further guidance on the meaning of the phrase "designed to enhance the quality of the service" (which is a pre-requisite for an inducement to be permitted
More informationCONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST SEC STAFF TRAINING Jennifer L. Klass Christine M. Lombardo May 20, 2015 2015 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Overview What is a Conflict? Regulatory Focus on Conflicts Framework for Addressing
More informationClient Alert. The SEC Facilitates Foreign Private Issuer Deregistration Under the Exchange Act. Deregistering Equity Securities
Number 588 11 April 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The SEC Facilitates Foreign Private Issuer Deregistration Under the Exchange Act Rule 12h 6 will come into force on June 4, 2007,
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 716 June 23, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices Developments in the Financial Services Industry In recent years... the enforcement of UDAP
More informationREQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS July 1, 2015 Charles Horn, Partner Steve Stone, Partner Melissa Hall, Of Counsel Monique Botkin, Investment Adviser Association (Moderator)
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department. The IRS Proposes Revisions to the Appeals Ex Parte Guidelines Is There Bite to the Bark?
Number 1219 July 26, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department The IRS Proposes Revisions to the Appeals Ex Parte Guidelines Is There Bite to the Bark? The proposed revisions appear to emphasize
More informationMiFID II Information to clients on costs and charges
MiFID II Information to clients on costs and Key Points associated /ancillary services and financial instruments should be disclosed to clients. This encompasses a wider range of costs than were previously
More informationVolcker Rule: An Initial Look at Significant Changes
Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Group Number 1626 December 23, 2013 Volcker Rule: An Initial Look at Significant Changes On December 10, 2013 the US federal banking agencies, 1 along with the Securities
More informationWhat's in a Name? The Volcker Rule's Impact on ABS Issuers that are Covered Funds. Contents. November 17, 2011
November 17, 2011 What's in a Name? The Volcker Rule's Impact on ABS Issuers that are Covered Funds. Contents Speed Read 2 Why the Volcker Rule Matters to ABS Issuers 3 What's in a Name? 4 Sponsorship
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 242 December 13, 2002 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The proposed rule is designed to force textual MD&A disclosures about off-balance sheet arrangements that have not been prominently
More informationThird Party Rights / Licence. Binding Framework. Negotiating Framework
Structures for Group Procurement Operations This pack provides an overview of various structures which can be considered when establishing a group procurement operation It assumes that the operation may
More informationUNDERSTANDING CLOSED- END INTERVAL FUNDS Sean Graber, Partner Thomas S. Harman, Partner David W. Freese, Associate. June 7, 2017
UNDERSTANDING CLOSED- END INTERVAL FUNDS Sean Graber, Partner Thomas S. Harman, Partner David W. Freese, Associate June 7, 2017 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Overview What are Interval Funds? How are
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 1021 26 April 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department The New EU Vertical Restraints Regulation: Navigating the Vast Seas Beyond Safe Harbors and Hardcore Restrictions The adoption
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 992 March 12, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Companies Doing Business With Iran and Other US-Sanctioned Countries Face Expanding Risks of Government Investigations and
More informationJoining the Crowd: SEC Adopts Final Crowdfunding Regulations - Part I
November 2015 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Broker-Dealer Capital Markets Corporate/M&A Emergining Growth and Venture Capital FinTech Global Government
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 410 October 4, 2004 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department... the Act imposes additional requirements on California charitable organizations by incorporating many of the so-called corporate
More informationAnatomy of a Deferred Compensation Plan
Executive Compensation Basics A Webinar Series Anatomy of a Deferred Compensation Plan Webinar 3 of 4 June 17, 2014 www.morganlewis.com Presenters: Daniel Hogans Randy McGeorge Leslie DuPuy Morgan, Lewis
More informationTHE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES
THE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES Jennifer L. Klass and Eric L. Perelman Wharton Pension Research Counsel 2018 Symposium: The Disruptive Impact of FinTech on Retirement
More informationSEC Approves Revised FINRA Equity Research and New Debt Research Rules
CLIENT MEMORANDUM SEC Approves Revised FINRA Equity Research and New Debt Research Rules September 24, 2015 AUTHORS Martin R. Miller P. Georgia Bullitt James R. Burns Howard L. Kramer The Securities and
More informationSEC Proposes Disclosure Rules for Critical Accounting Policies
NUMBER 202 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS CORPORATE DEPARTMENT BULLETIN NO. 202 JULY 3, 2002 SEC Proposes Disclosure Rules for Critical Accounting Policies This new rule would add several pages or more of textual
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1068 August 3, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CMS Announces Single Payment Amounts for the DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program and Proposed Changes to Reimbursement Policies
More informationABS New Markets Japan
ABS New Markets Japan 2 ABS New Markets Japan Fact pattern This scenario considers a UK RMBS master trust structure (a UK SPV Issuer, ultimately backed by a pool of UK collateral) admitted to trading on
More informationThe PSC register. The requirement for a register of persons with significant control over UK entities
The PSC register The requirement for a register of persons with significant control over UK entities 2 Hogan Lovells Since 6 April 2016, UK companies have been required to maintain a register of persons
More informationSEC Lifts Ban on General Solicitation by Private Funds
Alert Corporate & Securities If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered in this Alert, please contact one of the authors: Thao H. Ngo Partner, San Francisco +1 415
More informationMiFID II 18 January MiFID II
MiFID II 18 January 2017 1 MiFID II Suitability December 2016 MiFID II 18 January 2017 1 Key Points A specific requirement to take the client's ability to bear losses and risk tolerance into account when
More informationSEC Delays Municipal Advisor Registration and Record-Keeping Obligations
Updated January 16, 2014 Practice Group(s): Public Finance SEC Delays Municipal Advisor Registration and Record-Keeping Obligations By Scott A. McJannet, Erica R. Franklin, Laura D. McAloon and Cynthia
More informationDirectors and Officers Liabilities in Russia
Directors and Officers Liabilities in Russia Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the issues described in this note please contact a person mentioned below or the
More informationSEC Issues Risk Alert on Custody Rule, Reinforcing Its Message to Registered Investment Advisers in Its Examination Priorities for 2013
March 15, 2013 Practice Group: Private Equity Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments SEC Issues Risk Alert on Custody Rule, Reinforcing Its Message to Registered Investment Advisers
More informationMiFID II Best execution and client order handling
2015 MiFID II Best execution and client order handling Key Points The definition of trading venue will include the new MiFID II concept of an organised trading facility A firm's obligation to take steps
More informationPrepared by the Investment Management Practice Group
To maintain momentum StayCurrent. November 2003 SEC Approves New Hot Issue Rule for Equity IPOs Prepared by the Investment Management Practice Group The Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission
More informationContents. Introduction 4. Directors conflicts duties 4. What is a conflict? 5. Who can authorise? 6. Authorising conflicts 7
Directors conflicts of interests under the Companies Act 2006 Contents Introduction 4 Directors conflicts duties 4 What is a conflict? 5 Who can authorise? 6 Authorising conflicts 7 Practical steps for
More informationThe Last Days of Disco Ops
Latham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group March 11, 2014 Number 1660 The Last Days of Disco Ops Consider this scenario: Staying Alive, Inc., a publicly traded clothing company based in South Beach,
More information