arxiv: v1 [q-fin.mf] 9 Nov 2016

Transcription

1 Disenangling wrong-way risk: pricing CVA via change of measures and drif adjusmen Damiano Brigo Frédéric Vrins Firs version: February 29, 216. This version: November 1, 216. arxiv: v1 [q-fin.mf 9 Nov 216 Absrac A key driver of Credi Value Adjusmen CVA) is he possible dependency beween exposure and counerpary credi risk, known as Wrong-Way Risk WWR). A his ime, addressing WWR in a boh sound and racable way remains challenging: arbirage-free seups have been proposed by academic research hrough dynamic models bu are compuaionally inensive and hard o use in pracice. Tracable alernaives based on resampling echniques have been proposed by he indusry, bu hey lack mahemaical foundaions. This probably explains why WWR is no explicily handled in he Basel III regulaory framework in spie of is acknowledged imporance. The purpose of his paper is o propose a new mehod consising of an appealing compromise: we sar from a sochasic inensiy approach and end up wih a pricing problem where WWR does no ener he picure explicily. This resul is achieved hanks o a se of changes of measure: he WWR effec is now embedded in he drif of he exposure, and his adjusmen can be approximaed by a deerminisic funcion wihou affecing he level of accuracy ypically required for CVA figures. The performances of our approach are illusraed hrough an exensive comparison of Expeced Posiive Exposure EPE) profiles and CVA figures produced eiher by i) he sandard mehod relying on a full bivariae Mone Carlo framework and ii) our drif-adjusmen approximaion. Given he uncerainy inheren o CVA, he proposed mehod is believed o provide a promising way o handle WWR in a sound and racable way. Keywords: counerpary risk, CVA, wrong-way risk, sochasic inensiy, jump-diffusions, change of measure, drif adjusmen, wrong way measure 1 Inroducion The 28 Financial crisis sressed he imporance of accouning for counerpary risk in he valuaion of OTC ransacions, even when he laer are secured via clearly unperfec) collaeral agreemens. Counerpary defaul risk calls for a price adjusmen when valuing OTC derivaives, called Credi Value Adjusmen CVA). This adjusmen depends on he raded porfolio Π and he counerpary C. I represens he marke value of he expeced losses on he porfolio in case C defauls prior o he porfolio mauriy T. Alernaively, his can be seen as oday s price of replacing he counerpary in he financial ransacions consiuing he porfolio, see for example [12, [14, [22. The mahemaical expression of his adjusmen can be derived in a raher easy way wihin a risk-neural pricing framework. Ye, he compuaion of he resuling condiional expecaion poses some problems when addressing Wrong- Way Risk WWR) ha is, accouning for he possible saisical dependence beween exposure and counerpary credi risk. Several echniques have been proposed o ackle his poin. A his ime, here are wo main approaches o ackle WWR: he dynamic approach eiher srucural or reduced-form) and he saic resampling) approach. The firs one provides an arbirage-free seup and is popular among academic researchers. Unforunaely, i has he major disadvanage of being compuaionally inensive and cumbersome, which makes is pracical use difficul. On he oher hand, he second approach does Dep. of Mahemaics, Imperial College London, damiano.brigo@imperial.ac.uk Louvain Finance Cener & Cener for Operaions Research and Economerics CORE), Universié caholique de Louvain, frederic.vrins@uclouvain.be 1

2 no have a rigorous jusificaion bu has he nice feaure of providing he indusry wih a racable alernaive o evaluae WWR in a raher simple way. In spie of is significance, WWR is currenly no explicily accouned for in he Basel III regulaory framework; he lack of a reasonable alernaive o handle CVA is probably one of he reasons. In his paper, we revisi he CVA problem under WWR and propose an appealing way o handle i in a sound bu ye racable way. We show how CVA wih WWR can be wrien as CVA wihou WWR provided ha he exposure dynamics is modified accordingly. This will be achieved via a se of measures called wrong way measures. The paper is organized as follows. Secion 2 recalls he fundamenal CVA pricing formulae wih and wihou WWR. Nex, in Secion 3, we briefly review he mos popular echniques o address WWR in CVA compuaions. We hen focus on he case where defaul risk is managed in a sochasic inensiy framework and consider a Cox process seing more specifically. Secion 4 inroduces a se of new numéraires ha will generae equivalen maringale measures called wrong way measures WWM). Equipped wih hese new measures, he CVA problem wih WWR akes a similar form as he CVA problem wihou WWR, provided ha we change he measure under which one compues he expecaion of he posiive exposure. Secion 5 is dedicaed o he compuaion of he exposure dynamics under he WWM. Paricular aenion is paid o he sochasic drif adjusmen under affine inensiy models. In order o reduce he complexiy of he pricing problem, he sochasic drif adjusmen is approximaed by a deerminisic funcion; he WWR effec is hus fully encapsulaed in he exposure s drif via a deerminisic adjusmen. Finally, Secion 6 proposes an exensive analysis of he performances of he proposed approach in comparison wih he sandard sochasic inensiy mehod feauring Euler discreizaions of he bivariae sochasic differenial equaion SDE) governing he join dynamics of defaul inensiy credi spread risk) and porfolio value marke risk). 2 Counerpary risk adjusmen Define he shor risk-free) rae process r = r ) and he corresponding bank accoun numéraire B := e rsds so ha he deflaor B := B ) has dynamics : db = r B d. Under he no-arbirage assumpion, here exiss a risk-neural probabiliy measure Q associaed o his numéraire, in he sense ha i makes all B-discouned non-dividend paying radeable asses Q- maringales. In his seup, CVA can be compued as he Q- expecaion of he non-recovered losses resuling from counerpary s defaul, discouned according o B. More explicily, if R sands for he recovery rae of C and V is he close ou price of Π a ime 1, he general formula for he CVA on porfolio Π raded wih counerpary C which defaul ime is modeled via he random variable τ > is given by see for example [11): [ CVA = E B V + τ 1 R) 1I {τ T } = 1 R) E [E [H B B V + τ σhu T, u ) B τ B τ where E B denoes he expecaion operaor under Q, H := H ) is he defaul indicaor process defined as H := 1I {τ }, and he second equaliy resuls from he assumpion ha R is a consan and from he ower propery. The ouer expecaion can be wrien as an inegral wih respec o he risk-neural survival probabiliy G) := Q[τ > = E B [ 1I {τ>}. The survival probabiliy is a deerminisic posiive and decreasing funcion saisfying G) = 1 and ypically expressed as G) = e hs)ds where h is a non-negaive funcion called hazard rae. In pracice, his curve is boosrapped from marke quoes of securiies driven by he crediworhiness of 1 Here, we assume ha his corresponds o he risk-free price of he porfolio which is he mos common assumpion, named risk free closeou, even hough oher choices can be made, such as replacemen closeou, see for example [13,[14 2

3 C, i.e. defaulable bonds or credi defaul swaps CDS). If τ admis a densiy, he expression for CVA hen becomes T [ V CVA = 1 R) E B + τ = dg). 1) B In he case where he porfolio Π is independen of τ, one can drop condiioning in he above expecaion o obain he so-called sandard or independen) CVA formula: T CVA = 1 R) [ V E B + dg). 2) B where he superscrip in general denoes ha he relaed quaniy is compued under he independence assumpion. The deerminisic funcion being inegraed wih respec o he survival probabiliy is called he discouned) expeced posiive exposure, also known under he acronym EPE: [ V EPE ) := E B +. B Under his independence assumpion, CVA akes he form of he weighed coninuous) sum of European call opion prices wih srike where he underlying of he opion is he residual value of he porfolio Π. 3 Wrong way risk In he more general case where he marke value of Π depends on he defaul ime τ, we canno drop condiioning in he expecaion 1), and one has o accoun for he dependency beween credi and exposure. Depending on he sign of his relaionship and, more generally, on he join disribuion of he porfolio value and he defaul ime, his can increase or decrease he CVA; when CVA is increased, his effec is known as wrong way risk WWR). When CVA decreases, his is called righ way risk. In his paper we will use he erm wrong way risk o loosely denoe boh siuaions. In order o capure his effec, we need o model joinly exposure and credi. The firs named auhor and co-auhors pioneered he lieraure on WWR in a series of papers using a variey of modeling approaches across asse classes. In ineres rae markes, he analysis of WWR on uncollaeralized ineres rae porfolios is sudied in [16 via inensiy models for credi risk, while WWR on collaeralized ineres rae porfolios is sudied in [8. For credi markes, and uncollaeralized CDS in paricular, WWR is considered in [9, where inensiy models and copula funcions are used; WWR on collaeralized CDS wih collaeral and gap risk is sudied wih he same echnical ools in [7. WWR on commodiies, and oil swaps in paricular, has been sudied in [6 via inensiy models, and WWR on equiy is sudied in [15 resoring o analyically racable firs passage AT1P) firm value models. Mos of hese sudies are summarized in he monograph [ Two approaches for one problem Two main approaches have been proposed in he lieraure o ackle WWR. They all aim a coupling porfolio value and defaul likelihood in a racable way. The firs approach called dynamic) consiss in modeling credi worhiness using sochasic processes. Among his firs class of models one disinguish wo seups. The firs dynamic seup srucural model) relies on Meron s approach o model he firm value. Defaul is reached as soon as he firm value goes below a barrier represening he level of he firm s asses. This mehod is very popular in credi risk in general, excep for pricing purposes as i is know o underesimae shor-erm defaul see e.g. [2, 14, 15 and references herein for CVA pricing mehods using srucural credi models). The second dynamic seup reduced-form model) consiss in modeling he defaul likelihood via a sochasic inensiy process. In his seup, defaul is unpredicable; only he defaul likelihood is modeled. In he sequel we resric ourselves o sochasic inensiy models, which is he mos popular dynamic seup for CVA purposes see for insance [14,[16,[23,[26). 2 2 Noe ha oher mehodologies have been recenly proposed for credi risk modeling and CVA pricing see e.g. [29 and [24) bu hey will no be considered here. 3

4 This firs class of models is mahemaically sound in he sense ha i can be arbirage-free if handled properly. However, as poined in [26, dealing wih his addiional sochasic process may be compuaionally inensive. Hence, praciioners developed a second class of models called saic, o ge rid of hese difficulies. They consis in coupling exposure and credi using a copula, a specific funcion ha creaes a valid mulivariae disribuion from univariae ones his is no o be confused wih he copula connecing wo defaul imes ha was used for example in [7, resuling in a more rigorous formulaion in ha conex). This mehod is also known as a resampling echnique and is very popular among praciioners as i drasically simplifies he way CVA can be evaluaed under WWR. In paricular, i is numerically ineresing in he sense ha in a firs phase one can consider exposure and credi separaely, and hen, in a second phase, inroduce he dependence effec a poseriori by joining he corresponding disribuions via a copula see e.g. [26 and [28 for furher reading on his echnique). Clearly, his way o couple exposure and credi risk is somewha arificial. In paricular, i is known o suffer from poenial arbirage opporuniies, conrary o he WWR approaches lised earlier. In summary here are wo classes of models: dynamic arbirage-free models ha are compuaionally demanding and hard o use in pracice, and saic resampling models ha have no sound mahemaical jusificaion bu providing a racable alernaive for he indusry. Laer in he paper we explain how one can develop a framework encompassing he bes of boh he saic and dynamic approaches wihou heir inconveniences. In paricular, we circumven he echnical difficuly inheren o sochasic inensiy models wih he help of changes of measure. Before doing so we provide he reader wih addiional deails regarding he sochasic inensiy model seup. 3.2 CVA under a sochasic inensiy model The reduced-form approach relies on a change of filraions. Filraion G := G ) represens he oal informaion available o he invesors on he marke. In our conex, his can be viewed as all relevan asse prices and/or risk facors. All sochasic processes considered here are hus defined on a complee filered probabiliy space Ω, G, G = G ) T, Q) where Q is he risk-neural measure and G := G T wih T he invesmen horizon which can be considered here as he porfolio mauriy). We can define F := F ) T as he larges subfilraion of G prevening he defaul ime τ o be a F-sopping ime. In oher words, F conains he same informaion as G excep ha he defaul indicaor process H is no observable i.e. H is adaped o G bu no o F). In oher erms, we are assuming he oal marke filraion G o be separable in F and he pure defaul monioring filraion H where H = H ) T, H = σh u, u ), G = H F. A key quaniy for ackling defaul is he Azéma Q, F)-supermaringale see [19), defined as he projecion of he survival indicaor H o he subfilraion F: S := E B [ 1I {τ>} F = Q [τ > F. The financial inerpreaion of S is a survival probabiliy a given only observaion of he defaulfree filraion F up o and defaul monioring H for any name. Formally, he sochasic process S is linked o he survival probabiliy G by he law of ieraed expecaions: E B [S = E B [ E B [ 1I {τ>} F = E B [ 1I {τ>} = Q[τ > = G). 3) In many pracical applicaions, he curve G is given exogenously from marke quoes bond or credi defaul swaps). When his is he case, he above relaionship pus consrains on he dynamics of S so ha he equaliy E B [S = G) is hen referred o as he calibraion equaion. A very imporan resul from sochasic calculus is he so-called Key Lemma Lemma in [3) ha allows o ge rid of he explici defaul ime τ, focusing on he Azéma supermaringale insead. Applying his lemma o CVA yields he following equaion, ha holds whenever V τ H T is Q-inegrable and V is F-predicable 3 : [ [ V CVA = 1 R) E B + T τ 1I {τ T } = 1 R) E B B τ V + ds. 4) B 3 In our CVA conex, his second condiion amouns o say ha he porfolio Π is no allowed o explicily depend on τ. For insance, i canno conain corporae bonds whose reference eniy is precisely he counerpary C 4

5 The above resul can be undersood inuiively by localizing he defaul ime in any possible small inerval, + d, for spanning he whole mauriy horizon [, T. Defining dh := H +d H = 1I {τ,+d} one ges [ V E B + T τ H T = B τ [ V E B + T dh = B [ V E B + T E B [dh F = B [ V E B + ds B where we have used Fubini s heorem, he ower propery and assumed ha V is F-adaped hence is independen from H. 3.3 CVA in he Cox process seup An ineresing specific case of Azéma supermaringales arises when S is posiive and decreasing from S = 1 wih zero quadraic variaion. This corresponds o he Cox seup: he process S can be paramerized as S = e Λ where Λ := λ u du, where λ := λ ) is a non-negaive, F-adaped sochasic inensiy process. In his specific case, one can hink of S := S ) as a survival process so ha τ can be viewed as he firs) passage ime of S below a random hreshold drawn from a sandard uniform random variable, independen of S. Then, CVA including WWR) reduces o where T CVA = 1 R) ζ := 5) [ V E B + ζ dg) 6) B λ S h)g). Remark 1. The process ζ represens he differenial of he survival process S) normalized wih respec o he differenial of is ime- Q-expecaion G): ) dq[τ > Fs / ) ζ = dq[τ > Fs d s= d. s= When G is given exogenously from marke quoes, he denominaor can be considered as he prevailing marke view of he defaul likelihood. From ha perspecive, ζ is a kind of model-o-marke survival rae change raio. In he above expression, [ V EPE) := E B + ζ B is he EPE under WWR : i is he deerminisic profile o be inegraed wih respec o he survival probabiliy curve G o ge he CVA up o he consan 1 R) including WWR, jus like he EPE in he no-wwr case eq 2). Moreover, from he calibraion equaion 3), [ d E B [λ S = E B d S = d d EB [S = d d G) := G ) = h)g) so ha ζ is a uni-q-expecaion, non-negaive sochasic process. In he case of independence beween exposure V ) and risk-free rae r, B) on he one hand, and credi risk λ, S) on he oher hand, he expeced value in eq. 6) can be facorized and he equaion collapses o eq. 2) 4 : CVA = 1 R) T [ V E B + B E B [ζ dg) = 1 R) T EPE )dg) = CVA. 4 Recall ha eq. 4) holds provided ha he porfolio value process V does no depend on he explici defaul random variable. However, i may well depend on credi worhiness quaniies embedded in F, ypically credi spreads λ. Consider for example he case where he defaul ime τ is modeled as he firs jump of a Cox process wih a sricly posiive inensiy process. In ha case, τ = Λ 1 ξ, wih ξ sandard exponenial independen from λ. Then, he porfolio value V may depend on λ up o, bu no on informaion on ξ. 5

6 Generally speaking however, he facorizaion of expecaions [ V E B + ζ B = E B [ V + B E B [ζ 7) is no valid. Because of WWR, we have o accoun for he poenial saisical dependence beween marke and credi risk. This is ypically obained by modeling V, r and λ using correlaed risk facors. This can be achieved by modeling hese processes wih e.g. correlaed Brownian moions. One can even hink of making λ a deerminisic funcion of he exposure V, as in [23. This seup has he advanage o feaure parameers ha are more inuiive from a rading or risk-managemen perspecive han an insananeous correlaion beween laen risk-facors, bu he calibraion of he inensiy process is more involved and depends on he specific porfolio composiion. As he ime- sochasic inensiy λ depends in a deerminisic way on V, he survival process S depends on he whole pah of he exposure process up o. In spie of his specificiy, his approach fis in he sochasic inensiy seup and hence fis in he class of mehods covered here. 4 The Wrong Way Measure WWM) In he general case where eq. 7) does no hold, one needs o evaluae he lef-hand expecaion, which is much more involved han he righ-hand side and is he main reason why such models are no used in pracice. Neverheless, noing ha ζ is a non-negaive uni-expecaion process, comparing eq. 2) wih eq. 6) suggess ha he problem could be addressed using change of measure echniques. In his secion, we derive a se of equivalen maringale measures allowing us o obain such a facorizaion of expecaions, even in presence of WWR. The main difference is he measure under which he expecaions appearing on he righ-hand side are aken. 4.1 Derivaion of he EPE expression in he new measure We sar by specifying a bi furher he filered probabiliy space on which all sochasic processes are defined. The filraion F is generaed by a finie dimensional Brownian moion W driving exposure, raes and credi spreads. Filraion G is hus he marke filraion obained by enlarging F wih he naural filraion of he defaul indicaor H. Noice ha in a Cox seup, all discouned asses ha do no explicily depend on τ even if hey depend on λ) are Q-maringales under boh filraions. Wih his seup a hand, we can define Cs as he ime-s price of an asse proecing one uni of currency agains defaul of he counerpary on he period, + d, s. Using he Key lemma once again, [ Cs := E B Bs 1I {τ,+d} Gs = 1I {τ>s} B S s Because B s is F s -measurable, C F, s = B s M s where [ 1 Ms := E B λ S F s. B [ E B Bs λ S F s d. B } {{ } :=Cs F, Wih his noaion, C F, = B M = λ S. I is obvious o see ha Cs F, grows a he risk-free rae wih respec o s on [, is fixed). Indeed, by he maringale represenaion heorem he posiive maringale Ms can be wrien on [, as dm s = M sγ s dw s. Therefore Cs F, can be seen as he price of a radeable asse on [, compued under parial F) informaion. Obviously, he corresponding expeced rae of growh is equal o he risk-free rae under Q: dc F, s = db s M s) = db s M s + B s dm s = r s B s M sds + B s dm s = r s C F, s ds + C F, γ s dw s s 6

7 or equivalenly wih Io s lemma, d log Cs F, = r s γ s γ T ) s ds + γ s dw s. 2 We can hus choose C F, s [ V E B + [C F, λ S = E CF, B as numéraire for all s, s and wrie C F, λ S V + = C F, [ E CF, V + = E C [ F, V + [ E B λ S B, or equivalenly rescaling by 1/h)G)), [ V E B + ζ B = E [ [ CF, V + E B ζ. 8) B The probabiliy measure associaed o he expecaion operaor E CF, is noed Q CF, and is called he Wrong Way Measure WWM or WW measure). This measure will be furher specified from Q and he corresponding Radon-Nikodỳm derivaive process in Secion 4.3. A relaed measure based on a parial-informaion numéraire price had been inroduced in Chaper 23 of [12 o derive he CDS opions marke model. Equaion 8) is very similar o eq. 7) excep ha i) he RHS expecaion of he posiive exposure is aken under anoher measure han Q and ii) he bank accoun numéraire B does no appear in he firs bu in he second expecaion, embedding credi risk. In conras wih 7), 8) holds rue whaever he acual dependency beween all hose risks. I yields anoher expression for he EPE under WWR: EPE) = E [ [ CF, V + E B ζ. 9) B 4.2 EPE expression in he new measure under risk-free rae-credi independence I is very common o assume independence beween risk-free raes and credi. Indeed, such a poenial relaionship has ypically a very limied numerical impac see e.g. [5 for more deails). Wih his [ addiional assumpion one ges E B λ S B = P r, )G ) where P r s, ) is he ime-s price of a riskfree zero-coupon bond expiring a, i.e. [ P r s, ) := E B e s rudu F s. Hence, under independence beween counerpary s credi risk and he bank accoun numéraire, CVA finally reads T CVA = 1 R) E [ CF, V + P r, )dg). 1) The above expression looks very similar o he sandard CVA expression ha is revisied assuming independence beween all risk facors, namely T CVA = 1 R) E B [ V + P r, )dg). 11) Hence, he general CVA formula 1) including WWR bu wih he mild independence assumpion beween risk-free raes and counerpary credi) akes a similar form as he simple sandard CVA 11) i.e. wihou WWR) where, in addiion, risk-free raes are deerminisic. In his case, he general CVA expression is given by he independen CVA expression, bu replacing EPE ) = E B [V + in eq. 11) by EPE) = E [ CF, V +. This observaion suggess ha changing he measure may indeed help dealing wih WWR. 7

8 4.3 Radon-Nikodỳm derivaive process The numéraire C F, = Cs F, ) s is he numéraire associaed wih he WWM Q CF,. The corresponding Radon-Nikodỳm derivaive process Z is a Q-maringale on [, : dqcf, Zs := dq Fs = CF, s B C F, = M s B s M = E B [ λ S B F s In he case of independence beween raes and credi, Z simplifies o Z s = P r s, ) E B [ζ F s B s P r, ). E B [ λ S B. 12) In order for he CVA formula 1) o be useful in pracice, we need o compue E [ CF, V + ha is, o derive he exposure dynamics under his new measure. This is he purpose of he nex secion. 5 Exposure s drif adjusmen In he sequel we resric ourselves o he case where porfolio and credi risk are driven by a specific one-dimensional Q-Brownian moion, namely W V and W λ, respecively. These wo processes can be correlaed bu W λ is independen from he shor-rae drivers. These assumpions can be relaxed bu help clarifying he poin we wan o make, which is o show how one can ge rid of he link beween exposure and credi by changing he pricing measure. In his seup we assume ha hese Brownian moions and he shor-rae drivers acually generae he filraion F. We posulae coninuous dynamics for V under Q, dv s = α s ds + β s dw V s 13) where we assume he processes α and β o be coninuous and F-adaped, and derive he dynamics of V under Q CF,. I is known from Girsanov s heorem ha dw V s = d W V s + d W V, log C F, s, where W V s is a Q CF,, F)-Brownian moion. In oher words, he dynamics of V under Q CF, is given by dv s = α s + θ s) ds + βs d W V s, wih θs is a sochasic process known as drif adjusmen. Sandard resuls from sochasic calculus see e.g. he change-of-numéraire oolki presened in [12, Ch. II) yields he general form of his drif adjusmen : θsd = β s d W V, log C F, s. Evaluaing his cross-variaion requires o furher specify he risk-neural dynamics of he numéraire C F, and in paricular, he Q-dynamics for he defaul inensiy λ. Again, we adop a quie general framework: dλ s = µ λ s ds + σ λ s dw λ s, where µ λ s and σs λ are coninuous F-adaped sochasic processes. As λ is assumed independen from r, he new numéraire akes he form [ Cs F, = E B Bs [ [ F s E B λ S F s = P r s, ) E B λ S F s = P r P λ s, ) s, )S s 14) B where P λ s, ) := E B [ e s λudu F s. In order o proceed, we mus furher specify he form of P λ s, ). 8

9 5.1 Affine inensiy and shor-rae processes In his secion we derive he specific form of θ s in he sandard case where boh risk-free rae r and sochasic inensiy λ follow independen affine sochasic inensiy processes, he independence assumpion being jusified for example in [5, 12: P r s, ) = A r s, ) e Br s,)r s, P λ s, ) = A λ s, ) e Bλ s,)λ s. This in urn implies ha for x {r, λ}, see for example [4, dx s = µ x s ds + σ x s dw r s where d W r, W λ and he drif and diffusion coefficien of boh processes ake he specific form µ x s = µ x s x s ) = as) + bs)x s σ x s = σ x s x s ) = cs) + ds)x s for some deerminisic funcions a, b, c, d. Since P λ s, ) > for all s, one obviously ges A λ s, ) > so we can wrie P λ s, ) := P λ s, ) = Aλ s, ) ) e Bλ s,)λ s Bλ s, ) A λ s P λ s, ) =: P λ λ s, ) s, ) A λ s, ) Bλ s, )λ s. Observe ha he funcions A x, B x saisfy, for all u and x {r, λ}: A x u, u) = B x u, u) = 1 and B x u, u) = A x u, u) =. Plugging his expression P λ s, ) in 14), one obains ) A Cs F, = S s P r s, )P λ λ s, ) s, ) A λ s, ) Bλ s, )λ s and Io s lemma yields he dynamics of he log-numéraire, valid for s [, d log C F, s ) = λ s ds + d log P r s, ) + d log P λ s, ) + d log B λ s, )λ s Aλ s, ) A λ. s, ) From he affine srucure of r and λ, he above equaion becomes d log C F, s =...)ds B λ s, )dλ s B r s, )dr s + =...)ds + A λ s, )B λ s, ) A λ s, )B λ s, )λ s A λ s, ) Bλ s, ) Finally, one ges he following relaionship for he drif adjusmen: ) 1 d B B λ s, )λ s Aλ s,) λ s, )λ s Aλ s, ) A λ s, ) A λ s,) ) σs λ dws λ B r s, )σsdw r s r. 15) θs = λ s β s σs λ A λ s, )B λ ) s, ) A λ s, )B λ s, )λ s A λ s, ) Bλ s, ) r sβ s σsb r r s, ) 16) where λ s represens he insananeous correlaion beween he Brownian moions driving he exposure and credi risk, λ s ds := d W V, W λ s, and similarly r sds := d W V, W r s. 9

10 5.2 Deerminisic approximaion of he drif adjusmen Our main poin in his paper is o invesigae he WWR impac. Therefore, we focus on deerminisic risk-free raes and deerminisic correlaion λ s = s) in he sequel. This helps simplifying he framework since hen log P r s, ) conribues zero o he quadraic variaion of log Cs F,. In such a framework, he drif adjusmen simplifies o θs = s)β s σs λ A λ s, )B λ ) s, ) A λ s, )B λ s, )λ s A λ s, ) Bλ s, ). 17) Remark 2. The Radon-Nikodỳm derivaive process Z derived in Secion 4.3 is given as a condiional expecaion of ζ rescaled by risk-free zero-coupon bond prices and he bank accoun numéraire. I is possible however o furher specify he form of Z as a funcion of he drif adjusmen θ in he paricular framework considered in his secion. I is clear from eq. 12) ha Zs = B C F, C F, s B s where B = 1 and CF, C F, s B s is a non-negaive maringale. In he case of deerminisic ineres raes, he analyical expression of Cs F, is easily obained from he dynamics of log C F, given in 15) so ha finally { s Zs = exp θ udw u λ 1 s ) } 2 θ 2 u du where θ ss)β s := θ s. As he adjusmen in he drif exposure feaures he sochasic inensiy, θ = θ s) s is sochasic, and we canno simplify he problem by avoiding o simulae he driver W λ of he inensiy process. In order o reduce he dimensionaliy of he problem, one can look for deerminisic approximaions θs, ) of θ s. We inroduce below wo easy alernaives Replace λ s by is expeced value λs). A firs mehod consiss in replacing λ s by is expeced value under Q: λs) := E B [λ s in eq. 17): θs, ) = s)β s σs λ λs) ) A λ s, )B λ s, ) A λ s, )B λ s, ) λs) B λ s, ), 18) A λ s, ) where we have used he noaion σ λ s λ s ) := σ λ s Replace λ s by he implied hazard rae hs). A second mehod consiss in replacing λ s by hs) in eq. 17): θs, ) = s)β s σs λ hs) ) A λ s, )B λ s, ) A λ s, )B λ s, ) hs) A λ s, ) Bλ s, ). 19) Recall ha h) is he hazard rae implied by he survival probabiliy G) = P λ, ). [ Remark 3. As calibraion o marke daa forces he equaliy E B e λsds = e hs)ds, boh mehods are equivalen up o Jensen s effec: e hs)ds = E B [ e λsds e EB [λ sds = e λs)ds. Anoher way o see he connecions beween he wo approaches is o noice ha λ) coincides wih h) as long as one can neglec covariance beween λ and is inegraed version Λ: h) = d d ln G) = G ) G) = EB [λ S E B [S = λ + CovB [λ, S E B [S λ). 1

11 5.3 Calibraion and deerminisically shifed affine processes The class of affine processes is quie broad; Ornsein-Uhlenbeck OU), Cox-Ingersoll-Ross CIR) including he case wih jumps JCIR, see [1 for relaed calculaions for CDS and CDS opions) all fi in his class. Unforunaely, boh only have hree degrees of freedom; no enough for he calibraion equaion 3) o hold in general. This can be circumvened by considering homogeneous affine processes ha are shifed in a deerminisic way. In his seup, λ becomes a shifed version of a laen) homogeneous affine processes y: λ = y + ψ). The deerminisic shif funcion ψ is chosen o ensure ha he model-implied funcion P λ, ) agrees wih ha of a given survival probabiliy curve G) provided exernally. This is exacly eq 3): G) = P λ, ) = E B [ e λudu = E B [ e yudu e ψu)du = P y, )e ψu)du. Seing Ψ) := ψu)du, Ψs, ) := Ψ) Ψs) and using he affine propery of y, P λ s, ) = A y s, )e By s,)y s e Ψ) Ψs)) = A y s, )e By s,)ψs) Ψs,) e By s,)λ s. Hence, he shifed process λ is affine oo, wih A λ s, ) = A y s, )e By s,)ψs) Ψs,), B λ s, ) = B y s, ). These A λ, B λ are he A, B funcions o be used in he drif adjusmen 19). In paricular, A λ s, ) = A y s, )e By s,)ψs) Ψs,) + A λ s, ) B y s, )ψs) ψ)) A y ) = A λ s, ) s, ) A y s, ) + By s, )ψs) ψ), B λ s, ) = B y s, ). Hence, he funcions A λ and B λ as well as heir derivaives can be easily compued from he funcions A y, B y of he underlying process y and he survival probabiliy G. For he sake of compleeness we give he explici formulae in he appendix for y being OU, CIR and JCIR. The shifed versions λ = y + ψ) are called Hull-Whie, CIR ++ and JCIR ++, respecively. 6 Numerical experimens In his secion we compare he WW measure approach wih deerminisic approximaion of he drif adjusmen o he sandard Mone-Carlo seup feauring a 2D Euler scheme of he bivariae SDE driving he exposure and inensiy. We assume various Gaussian exposures and CIR ++ sochasic inensiy and disregard he impac of discouning o pu he focus and he reamen of he credi-exposure dependency Exposure processes, EPE and WWR-EPE Assuming Gaussian exposures has he key advanage of leading o analyical expressions of EPEs. For insance, le N µ, σ) sands for he Normal disribuion wih mean µ and sandard deviaion σ. Then, assuming V P) N µ), σ)) 2) for some deerminisic funcions µ), σ) > and probabiliy measure P, E P [ ) ) V + µ) µ) = σ)φ + µ)φ, 21) σ) σ) 5 Equivalenly, he processes V considered below can be seen as he sochasically discouned exposure V/B and hen se r B 1). 11

12 where φ is he sandard Normal densiy and Φ he corresponding cumulaive disribuion funcion. Hence, he Q-EPE is analyically racable if he exposure dynamics under Q feaures an affine drif and a deerminisic diffusion coefficien i.e. when α s = αs) + αs)v s and β s = βs) in 13). This includes he special cases where he exposure is modeled via an arihmeic Brownian moion, as in he Bachelier model, or as a mean-revering Ornsein-Uhlenbeck process, as in Vasicek s models. In case he exac exposure dynamics is no Gaussian, one migh consider he Gaussian assumpion as an approximaion, possibly obained via momen-maching or drif-freezing echniques, see for example [18 for he lognormal case applied o baske opions and [14 Chapers 4.4 and 4.5 for swap porfolios. Moreover, he profiles can ake various forms, and can successfully depic he behavior of exposure profiles of equiy reurn swaps or forward conracs in he simple Brownian case), or exposure profiles of ineres raes swap IRS, if drifed Brownian bridges are used insead). We focus below on specific exposures and sochasic inensiy processes ha lead o analyical racabiliy Forward-ype Gaussian exposure We choose for he coefficiens of exposure dynamics 13) α s and β s ν so ha he exposure is a rescaled Brownian moion, implying Q) V N, ν ) Hence, he EPE collapses o he RHS of 21) wih µ) = and σ) = ν : EPE ) = ν φ). In order o compue he EPE under WWR for a given survival probabiliy curve G, we consider an affine sochasic inensiy process λ and imply he drif funcion ψ from he calibraion equaion P λ, ) = G) as in Secion 5.3: ψ) = d d ln P y, ). G) One can hen easily esimae he EPE and hus CVA) E B [V + ζ by joinly simulaing λ and V in a sandard Mone Carlo framework. In his specific case however, he change-of-measure echnique proves o be very useful. Indeed, under he deerminisic drif adjusmen approximaion or under drif freezing, V is ineresingly again normally disribued under Q CF, wih mean µ) = Θ) := θu, )du and sandard deviaion σ) = ν. Applying eq. 21) yields EPE) ν ) ) Θ) Θ) φ ν + Θ)Φ ν Swap-ype, mean-revering Gaussian exposure. In his secion we adop an exposure profile ha mimics ha of an ineres rae swap in he sense ha here is a pull-o-pariy effec owards mauriy. To ha end, we use a drifed Brownian bridge. More explicily, we follow [27, Th and se he coefficiens in 13) o α s = γt s) Vs T s and σ s = ν so ha 1 V = γt ) + νt ) T s dw s V leading o Q) V N γt ), ν ) 1 /T ). In his model, γ governs he fuure expeced moneyness of he swap implied by he forward curve and ν drives he volailiy. Because he diffusion par is he same in boh forward-ype and swap-ype SDEs of V, he drif adjusmen process θ akes he same form in eiher cases. However, he marginal disribuions of he WWR exposure change. We compue hem below. Recall ha he dynamics of a OU process wih ime-dependen coefficiens akes he form dx s = κs)ηs) X s )ds + ɛs)dw s. 22) 12

13 wih The soluion o his SDE is a Gaussian process whose soluion can be easily found o be X X s = Gs, )X s + Is, ) + Js, )), Gs, ) := e s κu)du Is, ) := Js, ) := s s κu)ηu) e u s κv)dv du ɛu) e u s κv)dv dw u. In paricular, X is Normally disribued wih mean m) and variance v): ) 2 ɛu) m) = Gs, ) ms) + Is, )) and v) = G 2 s, ) vs) + du) Gs, u) In he simples case of consan volailiy ɛs) = ɛ, X is disribued as Q) X N e κu)du κu)ηu)e u κv)dv du, e 2 s κu)du ) ɛ 2 e 2 u κv)dv du. Basic algebra shows ha under Q CF, he exposure V akes he form 22) wih κs) = T s) 1 ηs) = T s)γt s) + θ s) ɛ = ν. Unforunaely, ηs) is no a deerminisic funcion; i feaures he inensiy process via θ s. However, i becomes deerminisic if one replaces θ s by is deerminisic proxy θs, ): ηs) T s)γt s) + θs, )). Under his approximaion, he exposure becomes a generalized OU process and V Q CF, ) N ) θu, ) γt ) + T ) u T du, ν 1 /T ) providing a closed form expression for he EPE under WWR given by eq. 21) wih P = Q CF, and θu, ) µ) = γt ) + T ) u T du, σ) = ν 1 /T ). Remark 4. Noice ha some non-gaussian exposures are analyically racable oo wih he deerminisic drif approximaion. For insance, if one knows beforehand ha he exposure will be posiive, one can consider he coefficiens in he exposure process dynamics 13) o be α s = αs)v s and β s = βs)v s, wih α ) and β ) deerminisic funcions of ime: leading o { V = V exp ) αs) β2 s) ds + 2 βs)dw V s EPE ) = E B [V + = E B [V = V e αs)ds. }, 13

14 Using Girsanov s heorem, he soluion V can be wrien as a funcion of he Q CF, -Brownian moion { ) V = V exp αs) + θs β2 s) } ds + βs)d 2 W s V, where θ s is given in 17) afer replacing β s by βs). Using he deerminisic approximaion, one obains EPE) = E [ CF, V + = E C F, [V = V e [ αs)ds E CF, e θds s V e αs)+θs,))ds = EPE ) e Θ). Noe ha he geomeric Browian moion assumpion for V here can be seen as an approximaion semming from momen maching, see for example [18 for he case of geomeric Brownian moion. 6.2 Discreizaion schemes The deerminisic approximaion o he sochasic drif-adjusmen resuling from he change-of-measure has he appealing feaure o avoid having o simulae he defaul inensiy. In he case where he exposures are normally or lognormally disribued, his leads o semi-closed form expressions for CVA, where only wo numerical inegraions are required one o compue Θ) = θu, )du and he oher one o inegrae he EPE profile wih respec o he survival probabiliy curve G o ge he final CVA). This conrass wih he sandard mehod ha consiss in he join simulaion of he exposure and defaul inensiy. To do so, one mus rely on 2D Mone Carlo scheme. In wo dimensions, i is hard o avoid using small ime seps as he join disribuion of V, λ) is unavailable when λ is CIR and V is Gaussian or lognormal, for example, under non-zero quadraic covariaion or correlaion ) beween he driving Brownian moions. Several schemes have been esed for simulaing he CIR process for λ. Mos of hem are comparable when he Feller condiion is saisfied and when volailiy is small. However, i is known ha simulaing such processes is ypically difficul oherwise. In paricular, he performances deeriorae when he volailiy is large. The CIR schemes can be divided in wo classes Non-negaive schemes A firs class of schemes avoid negaive samples whaever he ime sep δ and he volailiy. This is he case for insance of he refleced scheme originally inroduced in [2: y i+1)δ = y iδ + κθ y iδ )δ + σ δy iδ z i, 23) where z i are iid sandard Normal samples. The posiiviy can also be imposed using implici schemes, see e.g. [1 and [5 for a discussion on he performances. The issue is ha he convergence is raher disappoining : depending on he daa, even a very small δ of 1E 5 may no be enough in order for he empirical expecaion ÊB [S o fi reasonably well he heoreical expression P λ, ). This is of course a major obsacle as many bivariae) sample pahs have o be drawn, poenially for large mauriies. In fac, even in his simple framework, using hese posiive schemes becomes quickly unmanageable on a sandard compuer because he ime sep required o ensure he above fi is oo small. Fig. 1 illusraes his. We have simulaed N = 3k sample pahs from 23). The lef char provides he sample mean of he Azéma supermaringale Ê B [S := N 1 N n=1 S ω n ) dashed) wih he heoreical expecaion P λ, ) solid). The middle plo exhibis he hisogram of λ; one can check ha obviously, here is no negaive samples. Finally, he righ plo provides a comparison of ˆλ n := ÊB [λ := N n=1 λ ω n ) dashed), he analyical counerpar λ = E B [λ solid) as well as h) = d d lnp λ, )) ) /P λ, ) doed). One can see by visual inspecion, ha he approximaions ÊB [S P λ, ) and ÊB [λ λ are relaively poor for δ = 1E 2 op row). The boom row provides he same plos bu for δ = 1E 3. As expeced, he fi improves when decreasing he ime sep, bu he compuaion ime explodes from 36 s δ = 1E 2, op) o abou 6 minues δ = 1E 3, boom) on a sandard lapop compuer. 6 Noice ha many schemes are available for CIR. We resric ourselves o presen wo of hem who exhibi decen performances in our CVA applicaion and able o deal wih he non-feller case. 14

15 Probabiliy Densiy λ) λ a) δ = 1E 2 Probabiliy Densiy λ) λ b) δ = 1E 3 Figure 1: Saisics of samples generaed via scheme 23) based on 3k pahs wih ime sep δ for 5Y mauriy wih CIR parameers given by Se 2 in Table 1. Survival probabiliies heoreical, blue solid and empirical doed, red), hisograms of λ middle) and proxies λ) being eiher he expecaion of λ heoreical, blue solid and empirical, red doed) and h) black, doed). One can see ha all samples are non-negaive as expeced) bu he fi beween heoreical and empirical survival probabiliy curves is quie poor Relaxing he non-negaiviy consrain Alernaively, he scheme proposed by [2 and discussed in [25 seems o work well. I consiss in he following discreizaion scheme y i+1)δ = y iδ + κθ y + iδ )δ + σ δy + iδ z i. 24) 15

16 As clearly visible from he hisogram in Fig. 2, his scheme has he major drawback of no prevening negaive samples for he inensiy for a finie δ especially when volailiy is large). However, he fi beween ÊB [S and P λ, ) and similarly λ ˆλ n ) is already prey good when δ = 1E 2. As expeced, he proporion of negaive samples decreases wih decreasing ime sep bu he compuaion ime explodes he compuaion imes are comparable o hose of he previous scheme). Probabiliy Densiy λ) λ a) δ = 1E 2 Probabiliy Densiy λ) λ b) δ = 1E 3 Figure 2: Saisics of samples generaed via scheme 24) based on 3k pahs wih ime sep δ for 5Y mauriy wih CIR parameers given by Se 2 in Table 1. Survival probabiliies heoreical, blue solid and empirical doed, red), hisograms of λ middle) and proxies λ) being eiher he expecaion of λ heoreical, blue solid and empirical, red doed) and h) black, doed). One can see by visual inspecion ha he fi beween heoreical and empirical survival probabiliy curves is quie good even for δ = 1E 2. The choice of he discreizaion scheme will be shown o have lile impac on CVA figures in Sec- 16

17 ion Hence, one can op indifferenly for any sandard scheme provided ha i can deal wih cases where Feller s condiion is violaed. This violaion ofen happes in real marke cases when he large credi volailiy ends o push rajecories up and down in a way ha is no compaible wih Feller s condiion. We choose he scheme 24) which is raher sandard in pracice Discreizaion scheme for he JCIR The JCIR process can easily be simulaed by adjusing any of he above mehod for sampling a CIR process for he jumps, pah-by-pah and period-by-period. Sample pahs of he compound Poisson process are simulaed independenly, and a he end of each period feauring a jump, he corresponding CIR pahs are adjused by he associaed jump size. Because of discreizaion errors, he scheme is of course saisfacory only for ime sep δ being small enough. I is worh menioning ha Giesecke and Smelov recenly proposed in [21 an exac scheme o sample jump diffusions: he sandard error look comparable o a naive discreizaion bu he compuaional ime is cu by more han 75% and more ineresingly, he bias is killed. We rely on he sandard discreizaion algorihm in his paper as our focus is precisely o propose a mehod allowing one o ge rid of inensiy simulaion. 6.3 Wrong-way EPE profiles From he counerpary risk pricing poin of view only CVA ha is, he inegral of he EPE profile wih respec o he survival probabiliy curve maers. Ye, [ i is ineresing o firs have a look a he EPE profiles under wrong-way risk, i.e. a EPE) = E B V + B ζ as deerminisic funcions of ime. This helps geing an idea of how good he change-of-measure echnique is combined wih he deerminisic approximaion of he drif adjusmen) no a he aggregae level, bu for he exposure a a specific ime. This is imporan for analyss monioring counerpary exposure, and more generally for riskmanagemen purposes. Therefore in his secion we provide EPE profiles for specific parameer values of he exposure and sochasic inensiy processes. The parameer values are chosen such ha specific EPE shapes are generaed e.g. exposure profiles being no a monoonic funcion of correlaion). This proves paricularly ineresing as i allows us o analyze wheher he drif-adjusmen mehod is able o reproduce he subleies of hese profiles, like asymmery and crossings for example. Figure 3 below shows EPE profiles for Gaussian forward-ype or equiy reurn) exposures for he CIR ++ µ λ s = κθ λ s ) and σs λ = σ λ λ s ) wih σ λ x) = σ λ x). Top panels show he EPE obained by he full 2D) Mone Carlo simulaion. They prove o be exremely close o he corresponding panels a he boom, obained semi-analyically wih he measure-change under deerminisic drif adjusmen approximaion 19). The approximaion performs very well for he CIR ++ inensiy in swap-ype profiles oo, as one can see from Fig

18 EPE) EPE) a) T = 5Y, h) = 15% b) T = 1Y, h) = 3% EPE) EPE) c) T = 5Y, h) = 15% d) T = 1Y, h) = 3% Figure 3: EPE dashed) and EPE solid) wih CIR ++ inensiy for various correlaion levels, from = 8% orange) o = 8% black) by seps of 2%. Full 2D Mone Carlo op, 3k pahs, δ = 1E 2 ) and WWR measure wih deerminisic drif adjusmen boom). Parameers: ν = 8% exposure) and y = h), σ = 12%, κ = 35%, θ = 12% inensiy). 18

19 EPE) EPE) EPE) a) T = 5Y, h) = 15% b) T = 15Y, h) = 15% c) T = 15Y, h) = 3% EPE) EPE) EPE) d) T = 5Y, h) = 15% e) T = 15Y, h) = 15% f) T = 15Y, h) = 3% Figure 4: EPE dashed) and EPE solid) for various correlaion levels, from = 8% orange) o = 8% black) by seps of 2%. Full 2D Mone Carlo op, 3k pahs, δ = 2E 2 ) and deerminisic drif adjusmen boom). Parameers: γ =.1%, ν = 2.2% exposure) and y = h), κ = 35%, θ = 12%, σ = 12% inensiy). 19

20 Comparing op and boom rows of figures 3 and 4 suggess ha he deerminisic approximaion of he drif adjusmen preserves he abiliy of he change-of-measure approach o reproduce specific properies of he EPE profiles, including crossings and asymmery. We have considered CIR and CIR ++ here for inensiies, bu one migh also wish o consider oher affine models. Shifed OU also known as Hull-Whie) is one of hem. This exremely racable model is very popular for ineres-raes modeling. However, as his is a Gaussian process, i is no appropriae for defaul inensiies or posiive exposures given he possibiliy of negaive values. More specifically, Q-EPE can be compued semi-analyically in he case of Gaussian exposures and OU dynamics for inensiies in which case CVA can indeed become negaive, which is clearly wrong see e.g. [29). By conras, expressions of he form E P [V + will of course always be non-negaive, whaever he measure P so ha here is no hope ha he WWM approach will agree wih he resuls found by compuing he EPE under Q direcly. The reason for his mismach is of course ha he choice of he numéraire is no valid in his case as i is no guaraneed o be posiive. However, he change-of-measure echnique is accepable when he process parameers are such ha λ akes negaive values wih very small probabiliy, a leas when V is posiive posiive ). We do no discuss furher he resuls corresponding o OU inensiies. Anoher possible model is JCIR or is shifed version JCIR ++ ). For sake of breviy, we will analyze CVA figures direcly in Secion CVA figures The above secion emphasizes ha he change-of-numéraire echnique, in spie of he deerminisic approximaion of he drif adjusmen, allows o adequaely represen he funcional form of he EPE profiles under WWR. In his secion we focus on CVA figures and compare he resuls obained by using eiher he full Mone Carlo simulaion or he semi-analyical resuls using he deerminisic drif adjusmen. Insead of specifying a given survival probabiliy curve, we sar from he CIR parameers and ake P y, ) as G) so ha no shif is needed, i.e. λ y. This way of proceeding rules ou poenial problems of geing negaive inensiies as a resul of a negaive shif and yields a large degree of freedom o play wih he parameers Effec of he long-erm mean We ha fix he CIR parameers and play wih four differen values of he long erm mean driving he slope of he CDS curve, i.e. conango or backwardaion) as well as wih he mauriy, he ype and he volailiy of he exposure process. The corresponding CVA figures are given in Figure 5. Noice ha he CVA is quoed in basis poins upfron. They can be convered in a running premium Chaper 21.3 in [12 and [3. 2

21 CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps a) α =.5 b) α = 1.5 c) α = 5 d) α = 1 CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps e) α =.5 f) α = 1.5 g) α = 5 h) α = 1 Figure 5: CVA Figures wih κ = 1%, θ = αy%, y = 5 bps. Top row: Brownian exposure T = 1Y wih ν = 2.2%, σ =.8%, Boom row drif-inclusive Brownian bridge exposure T = 15Y wih ν = 8%, σ = 1%. Legend: CVA wih change-of-measure echnique solid red), average of 1 Full 2D Mone Carlo runs wih 3k each doed blue) and corresponding confidence inerval 2 imes sandard deviaion esimaed from he ses of runs). 21

22 Se y bps) κ θ bps) σ 2κθ σ % 161 8% 4E % 45 15%.9% 3 1 8% 2 2% -.8% 4 3 5% 5 5% -2% Table 1: Feller condiion is violaed in some cases, specifically in Se Comparison of performances for 4 ses of CIR parameers Some possible ses for he CIR parameers are given in Table 1. Se 1 has been chosen exogeneously, Se 2 is aken from [16 while Se 3 & Se 4 come from [17. We refer o hese works for CDS implied volailiies and oher marke paern implied by hese parameers. Noice ha Se 4 looks relaively exreme in ha he volailiy parameer is quie large and Feller condiion is srongly violaed. In his secion we sress he impac of he volailiy on he qualiy of he deerminisic approximaion of he drif adjusmen. The CVA figures are shown wih respec o correlaion on Fig

23 CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps a) Se 1, ν = 2.2% b) Se 2, ν = 2.2% c) Se 3, ν = 2.2% d) Se 4, ν = 2.2% CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps CVA [bps e) Se 1, ν = 8% f) Se 2, ν = 8% g) Se 3, ν = 8% h) Se 4, ν = 8% Figure 6: CVA Figures for boh change-of-measure and Mone Carlo mehods 3k pahs) for a 15Y swap-ype exposures for various exposure volailiy and CIR parameers. 23