arxiv: v4 [q-fin.mf] 6 Aug 2015

Transcription

1 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES: THEORY, EXAMPLES AND CALIBRATION ZORANA GRBAC, ANTONIS PAPAPANTOLEON, JOHN SCHOENMAKERS, AND DAVID SKOVMAND arxv:45.245v4 q-fn.mf] 6 Aug 25 Absrac. We nroduce a mulple curve framework ha combnes racable dynamcs and sem-analyc prcng formulas wh posve neres raes and bass spreads. Negaves raes and posve spreads can also be accommodaed n hs framework. The dynamcs of OIS and LIBOR raes are specfed followng he mehodology of he affne LIBOR models and are drven by he wde and fleble class of affne processes. The affne propery s preserved under forward measures, whch allows us o derve Fourer prcng formulas for caps, swapons and bass swapons. A model specfcaon wh dependen LIBOR raes s developed, ha allows for an effcen and accurae calbraon o a sysem of caple prces.. Inroducon The recen fnancal crss has led o paradgm shfng evens n neres rae markes because subsanal spreads have appeared beween raes ha used o be closely mached; see Fgure. for an llusraon. We can observe, for eample, ha before he cred crunch he spread beween he hree monh LIBOR and he correspondng Overngh Indeed Swap OIS rae was nonzero, however could be safely dsregarded as neglgble. The same s rue for he hree monh vs s monh bass swap spread. However, snce Augus 27 hese spreads have been evolvng randomly over me, are subsanally oo large o be negleced, and also depend on he enor lengh. Therefore, he assumpon of a sngle neres rae curve ha could be used boh for dscounng and for generang fuure cash flows was serously challenged, whch led o he nroducon of he so-called mulple curve neres rae models. In he mulple curve framework, one curve s used for dscounng purposes, where he usual choce s he OIS curve, and hen as many LIBOR curves as marke enors e.g. m, 3m, 6m and y are bul for generang fuure cash flows. The dfference beween he OIS and each LIBOR rae s usually called bass spread or smply bass. There are several ways of modelng he curves and dfferen defnons of he spread. One approach s o model he OIS and LIBOR raes drecly whch leads o racable prcng formulas, bu he sgn of he spread s more dffcul o conrol and may become negave. Anoher 2 Mahemacs Subjec Classfcaon. 9G3, 9G2, 6G44. Key words and phrases. Mulple curve models, LIBOR, OIS, bass spread, affne LIBOR models, caps, swapons, bass swapons, calbraon. We are graeful o Fabo Mercuro and Seven Shreve for valuable dscussons and suggesons. We also hank semnar parcpans a Cass Busness School, Imperal College London, he London Mahemacal Fnance Semnar, Carnege Mellon Unversy and he Unversy of Padova for her commens. All auhors graefully acknowledge he fnancal suppor from he DFG Research Cener Maheon, Projecs E5 and E3.

2 2 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND approach s o model he OIS and he spread drecly and nfer he dynamcs of he LIBOR; hs grans he posvy of he spread, bu prcng formulas are generally less racable. We refer o Mercuro 2b, pp. -2 for a dealed dscusson of he advanages and dsadvanages of each approach. Moreover, here es varous defnons of he spread: an addve spread s used e.g. by Mercuro 2a, a mulplcave spread was proposed by Henrard 2, whle an nsananeous spread was used by Andersen and Perbarg 2; we refer o Mercuro and Xe 22 for a dscusson of he mers of each defnon. The leraure on mulple curve models s growng rapdly and he dfferen models proposed can be classfed n one of he caegores descrbed above. Moreover, dependng on he modelng approach, one can also dsngush beween shor rae models, Heah Jarrow Moron HJM models and LIBOR marke models LMM wh mulple curves. The spreads appearng as modelng quanes n he shor rae and he HJM models are, by he very naure of hese models, nsananeous and gven n addve form. We refer o Banche and Morn 23 for a dealed overvew of several mulple curve models. In he shor rae framework, we menon Kenyon 2, Kjma, Tanaka, and Wong 29 and Morno and Runggalder 24, where he addve shor rae spread s modeled, whch leads o mulplcave adjusmens for neres rae dervave prces. HJM-ype models have been proposed e.g. by Fuj, Shmada, and Takahash 2, Crépey, Grbac, and Nguyen 22, Moren and Pallavcn 24, Crépey, Grbac, Ngor, and Skovmand 25a and Cuchero, Fonana, and Gnoao 24. The models by Mercuro 29, Banche 2 where an analogy wh he cross-currency marke has been eploed and Henrard 2 are developed n he LMM seup, whle mulple curve eensons of he Flesaker and Hughson 996 framework have been proposed n Nguyen and Sefred 25 and Crépey, Macrna, Nguyen, and Skovmand 25b. Typcally, mulple curve models address he ssue of dfferen neres rae curves under he same currency, however, he paper by Fuj e al. 2 sudes a mulple curve model n a cross-currency seup. Flpovć and Trolle 23 offer a horough economerc analyss of he mulple curve phenomena and decompose he spread no a cred rsk and a lqudy rsk componen. In recen work, Gallschke, Müller, and Sefred 24 consruc a srucural model for nerbank raes, whch provdes an endogenous eplanaon for he emergence of bass spreads. Anoher mporan change due o he crss s he emergence of sgnfcan counerpary rsk n fnancal markes. In hs paper, we consder he clean valuaon of neres rae dervaves meanng ha we do no ake no accoun he defaul rsk of he counerpares nvolved n a conrac. As eplaned n Crépey e al. 25a and Morno and Runggalder 24, hs s suffcen for calbraon o marke daa whch correspond o fully collaeralzed conracs. The prce adjusmens due o counerpary and fundng rsk for wo parcular counerpares can hen be obaned on op of he clean prces, cf. Crépey e al. 25a, Crépey e al. 25b, and n parcular Papapanoleon and Wardenga 25 for compuaons n affne LIBOR models. Le us also menon ha here es varous oher frameworks n he leraure where dfferen curves have been modeled smulaneously, for eample when dealng wh cross-currency markes cf. e.g. Amn and Jarrow 99 or when consderng cred rsk cf. e.g. he book by Beleck and Rukowsk

3 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 3 2 3m EUR LIBOR OIS EONIA spread Spo 3 year EUR 3m/6m Bass Swap Spread bass pons Fgure.. Spread developmen from January 24 o Aprl The models n he mulple curve world ofen draw nspraon from hese frameworks. The am of hs paper s o develop a mulple curve LIBOR model ha combnes racable model dynamcs and sem-analyc prcng formulas wh posve neres raes and bass spreads. The framework of he affne LIBOR models proposed by Keller-Ressel, Papapanoleon, and Techmann 23 urns ou o be alor-made for hs ask, snce allows us o model drecly LIBOR raes ha are greaer han her OIS counerpars. In oher words, he nonnegavy of spreads s auomacally ensured. Smulaneously, he dynamcs are drven by he wde and fleble class of affne processes. Smlar o he sngle curve case, he affne propery s preserved under all forward measures, whch leads o sem-analycal prcng formulas for lqud neres rae dervaves. In parcular, he prcng of caples s as easy as n he sngle curve seup, whle he model srucure allows o derve effcen and accurae appromaons for he prcng of swapons and bass swapons usng a lnearzaon of he eercse boundary. In addon, he model offers adequae calbraon resuls o a sysem of caple prces for varous srkes and maures. The paper s organzed as follows: n Secon 2 we revew he man properes of affne processes and he consrucon of ordered marngales greaer han one. Secon 3 nroduces he mulple curve neres rae seng. The mulple curve affne LIBOR model s presened n Secon 4 and s man properes are dscussed, n parcular he ably o produce posve raes and spreads and he analycal racably.e. he preservaon of he affne propery. A model ha allows for negave neres raes and posve spreads s also presened. In Secon 5 we sudy he connecon beween he class of affne LIBOR models and he class of LIBOR marke models drven by semmarngales. Secons 6 and 7 are devoed o he valuaon of he mos lqud neres rae dervaves such as

4 4 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND swaps, caps, swapons and bass swapons. In Secon 8 we consruc a mulple curve affne LIBOR model where raes are drven by common and dosyncrac facors and calbrae hs o marke daa. Moreover, we es numercally he accuracy of he swapon and bass swapon appromaon formulas. Secon 9 conans some concludng remarks and commens on fuure research. Fnally, Append A provdes an eplc formula for he ermnal correlaon beween LIBOR raes. 2. Affne processes Ths secon provdes a bref revew of he man properes of affne processes and he consrucon of ordered marngales greaer han one. More deals and proofs can be found n Keller-Ressel e al. 23 and he references heren. Le Ω, F, F, IP denoe a complee sochasc bass, where F = F,T ] and T denoes some fne me horzon. Consder a sochasc process X sasfyng: Assumpon A. Le X = X,T ] be a conservave, me-homogeneous, sochascally connuous Markov process wh values n D = R d, and IP D a famly of probably measures on Ω, F, such ha X =, IP -almos surely for every D. Seng { I T := u R d : IE e u,x T ] } <, for all D, 2. we assume ha I T, where I T denoes he neror of I T wh respec o he opology nduced by he Eucldean norm on R d ; he condonal momen generang funcon of X under IP has eponenally-affne dependence on ; ha s, here es deermnsc funcons φ u :, T ] I T R and ψ u :, T ] I T R d such ha IE ep u, X ] = ep φ u + ψ u,, 2.2 for all, u,, T ] I T D. Here, denoes he nner produc on R d and IE he epecaon wh respec o IP. Moreover, holds ha I T I for T, cf. Keller-Ressel and Mayerhofer 25, Theorem 2.4. In oher words, f u R d s such ha IE e u,x T ] <, hen IE e u,x ] < for every T. The funcons φ and ψ sasfy he followng sysem of ODEs, known as generalzed Rcca equaons φ u = F ψ u, φ u =, 2.3a ψ u = Rψ u, ψ u = u, 2.3b for, u, T ] I T. The funcons F and R are of Lévy Khnchne form: F u = b, u + e ξ,u mdξ, 2.4a R u = β, u + D α 2 u, u + D e ξ,u u, h ξ µ dξ, 2.4b

5 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 5 where b, m, α, β, µ d are admssble parameers and h : R d Rd are suable runcaon funcons. The funcons φ and ψ also sasfy he sem-flow equaons φ +s u = φ u + φ s ψ u ψ +s u = ψ s ψ u for all + s T and u I T, wh nal condon 2.5a 2.5b φ u = and ψ u = u. 2.6 We refer o Duffe, Flpovć, and Schachermayer 23 for all he deals. The followng defnon wll be used n he sequel, where :=,,...,. Defnon 2.. Le X be a process sasfyng Assumpon A. Defne γ X := sup u I T R d > IE e u,x T ]. 2.7 The quany γ X measures he ably of an affne process o f he nal erm srucure of neres raes and equals nfny for several models used n mahemacal fnance, such as he CIR process and OU models drven by subordnaors; cf. Keller-Ressel e al. 23, 8. An essenal ngreden n affne LIBOR models s he consrucon of paramerzed marngales whch are greaer han or equal o one and ncreasng n hs parameer see also Papapanoleon 2. Lemma 2.2. Consder an affne process X sasfyng Assumpon A and le u I T R d. Then he process M u = M u,t ] wh M u = ep φ T u + ψ T u, X, 2.8 s a marngale, greaer han or equal o one, and he mappng u M u ncreasng, for every, T ]. Proof. Consder he random varable YT u := e u,x T. Snce u I T R d we have ha YT u s greaer han one and negrable. Then, from he Markov propery of X, 2.2 and he ower propery of condonal epecaons we deduce ha M u = IE e u,x T F ] = ep φt u + ψ T u, X, 2.9 s a marngale. Moreover, s obvous ha M u he orderng s for all, T ], whle u v = M u M v, T ], 2. follows from he orderng of Y u T and he represenaon M u = IEY u T F ]. 3. A mulple curve LIBOR seng We begn by nroducng he noaon and he man conceps of mulple curve LIBOR models. We wll follow he approach nroduced n Mercuro 2a, whch has become he ndusry sandard n he meanme. The fac ha LIBOR-OIS spreads are now enor-dependen means ha we canno work wh a sngle enor srucure any longer. Hence, we sar wh a dscree, equdsan me srucure T = { = T < T < < T N }, where T k, k K := {,..., N}, denoe he maures of he asses raded n he marke. Ne, we consder dfferen subses of T wh equdsan me pons,

6 6 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND T T T 2 T 3 T 4 T 5 T 6 T n T N T T T 2 T N T T 2 T 2 N 2 Fgure 3.2. Illusraon of dfferen enor srucures..e. dfferen enor srucures T = { = T < T < < T N }, where X := {, 2,..., n } s a label ha ndcaes he enor srucure. Typcally, we have X = {, 3, 6, 2} monhs. We denoe he enor lengh by δ = Tk T k, for every X. Le K := {, 2,..., N } denoe he collecon of all subscrps relaed o he enor srucure T. We assume ha T T and TN = T N for all X. A graphcal llusraon of a possble relaon beween he dfferen enor srucures appears n Fgure 3.2. Eample 3.. A naural consrucon of enor srucures s he followng: Le T = { = T < T < < T N } denoe a dscree me srucure, where T k = kδ for k =,..., N and δ >. Le X = { =, 2,..., n } N, where we assume ha k s a dvsor of N for all k =,..., n. Ne, se for every X T k = k δ =: kδ, for k =,..., N := N/, where obvously Tk = T k. Then, we can consder dfferen subses of T,.e. dfferen enor srucures T = { = T < T < < T N }, whch sasfy by consrucon T T = T and also TN = N δ = T N, for all X. We consder he OIS curve as dscoun curve, followng he sandard marke pracce of fully collaeralzed conracs. The marke prces for caps and swapons consdered n he sequel for model calbraon are ndeed quoed under he assumpon of full collaeralzaon. A dealed dscusson on he choce of he dscoun curve n he mulple curve seng can be found e.g. n Mercuro 2a and n Hull and Whe 23. The dscoun facors B, T are srpped from marke OIS raes and defned for every possble maury T T va T B, T = B OIS, T. We denoe by B, T he dscoun facor,.e. he prce of a zero coupon bond, a me for maury T, whch s assumed o concde wh he correspondng OIS-based zero coupon bond for he same maury. We also assume ha all our modelng objecs lve on a complee sochasc bass Ω, F, F, IP N, where IP N denoes he ermnal forward measure,.e. he marngale measure assocaed wh he numerare B, T N. The correspondng epecaon s denoed by IE N. Then, we nroduce forward measures IP k assocaed o he numerare B, T k for every par, k wh X and k K. The correspondng epecaon s denoed by IE k. The forward measures IP k

7 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 7 are absoluely connuous wh respec o IP N, and defned n he usual way,.e. va he Radon Nkodym densy dip k = B, T N dip N B, Tk BTk, T N. 3. Remark 3.2. Snce T T here ess an l K and a k K such ha T l = Tk. Therefore, he correspondng numerares and forward measures concde,.e. B, T l = B, Tk and IP l = IP k. See agan Fgure 3.2. Ne, we defne he wo raes ha are he man modelng objecs n he mulple curve LIBOR seng: he forward OIS rae and he forward LIBOR rae. We also defne he addve and he mulplcave spread beween hese wo raes. Le us denoe by LTk, T k he spo LIBOR rae a me T k for he me nerval Tk, T k ], whch s an F Tk -measurable random varable on he gven sochasc bass. Defnon 3.3. The me- forward OIS rae for he me nerval Tk, T k ] s defned by Fk := B, T k δ B, Tk. 3.2 Defnon 3.4. The me- forward LIBOR rae for he me nerval T k, T k ] s defned by L k = IE k LT k, T k F ]. 3.3 The forward LIBOR rae s he fed rae ha should be echanged for he fuure spo LIBOR rae so ha he forward rae agreemen has zero nal value. Hence, hs rae reflecs he marke epecaons abou he value of he fuure spo LIBOR rae. Noce ha a me = Tk we have ha L k T k = IE k LT k, T k F T k ] = LT k, Tk, 3.4.e. hs rae concdes wh he spo LIBOR rae a he correspondng enor daes. Remark 3.5. In he sngle curve seup, 3.2 s he defnon of he forward LIBOR rae. However, n he mulple curve seup we have ha LTk, T k δ BTk, T k, hence he OIS and he LIBOR raes are no longer equal. Defnon 3.6. The spread beween he LIBOR and he OIS rae s defned by Sk := L k F k. 3.5 Le us also provde an alernave defnon of he spread based on a mulplcave, nsead of an addve, decomposon. Defnon 3.7. The mulplcave spread beween he LIBOR and he OIS rae s defned by + δ Rk := + δ L k + δ Fk 3.6.

8 8 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND A model for he dynamc evoluon of he OIS and LIBOR raes, and hus also of her spread, should sasfy ceran condons whch sem from economc reasonng, arbrage requremens and her respecve defnons. These are, n general, conssen wh marke observaons. We formulae hem below as model requremens: M F k and F k MIP k, for all X, k K,, T k ]. M2 L k and L k MIP k, for all X, k K,, T k ]. M3 S k and S k MIP k, for all X, k K,, T k ]. Here MIP k denoes he se of IP k -marngales. Remark 3.8. If he addve spread s posve he mulplcave spread s also posve and vce versa. 4. The mulple curve affne LIBOR model We descrbe ne he affne LIBOR model for he mulple curve neres rae seng and analyze s man properes. In parcular, we show ha hs model produces posve raes and spreads,.e. sasfes he modelng requremens M M3 and s analycally racable. In hs framework, OIS and LIBOR raes are modeled n he spr of he affne LIBOR model nroduced by Keller- Ressel e al. 23. Le X be an affne process defned on Ω, F, F, IP N, sasfyng Assumpon A and sarng a he canoncal value. Consder a fed X and he assocaed enor srucure T. We consruc wo famles of paramerzed marngales followng Lemma 2.2: ake wo sequences of vecors u k k K and vk k K, and defne he IP N-marngales M u k and M v k va M u k = ep φ TN u k + ψ T N u k, X, 4. and M v k = ep φ TN vk + ψ T N vk, X. 4.2 The mulple curve affne LIBOR model posulaes ha he OIS and he LI- BOR raes assocaed wh he -enor evolve accordng o + δ F k u k M = M u k and + δ L k v k M = M u k, 4.3 for every k = 2,..., N and, T k ]. In he followng hree proposons, we show how o consruc a mulple curve affne LIBOR model from any gven nal erm srucure of OIS and LIBOR raes. Proposon 4.. Consder he me srucure T, le B, T l, l K, be he nal erm srucure of non-negave OIS dscoun facors and assume ha B, T B, T N. Then he followng saemens hold: If γ X > B, T /B, T N, hen here ess a decreasng sequence u u 2 u N = n I T R d, such ha M u l = B, T l B, T N for all l K. 4.4

9 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 9 In parcular, f γ X =, he mulple curve affne LIBOR model can f any nal erm srucure of OIS raes. 2 If X s one-dmensonal, he sequence u l l K s unque. 3 If all nal OIS raes are posve, he sequence u l l K s srcly decreasng. Proof. See Proposon 6. n Keller-Ressel e al. 23. Afer fng he nal erm srucure of OIS dscoun facors, we wan o f he nal erm srucure of LIBOR raes, whch s now enor-dependen. Thus, for each k K, we se u k := u l, 4.5 where l K s such ha T l = Tk ; see Remark 3.2. In general, we have ha l = kt /T, whle n he seng of Eample 3. we smply have l = k,.e. u k = u k. Proposon 4.2. Consder he seng of Proposon 4., he fed X and he correspondng enor srucure T. Le L k, k K, be he nal erm srucure of non-negave LIBOR raes and assume ha for every k K The followng saemens hold: L k δ B, T k B, T k = Fk. 4.6 If γ X > ma k K + δ L k B, T k /B, T N, hen here ess a sequence v, v 2,..., v N = n I T R d, such ha v k u k and M v k = + δ L k+ M u k+, for all k K \{N }. 4.7 In parcular, f γ X =, hen he mulple curve affne LIBOR model can f any nal erm srucure of LIBOR raes. 2 If X s one-dmensonal, he sequence vk k K s unque. 3 If all nal spreads are posve, hen vk > u k, for all k K \{N }. Proof. Smlarly o he prevous proposon, by fng he nal LIBOR raes we oban a sequence vk k K whch sasfes 3. The nequaly v k u k follows drecly from 4.6. Proposon 4.3. Consder he seng of he prevous proposons. Then we have: F k and L k are IP k -marngales, for every k K. 2 L k F k, for every k K,, T k ]. Proof. Snce M u k and M v k are IP N -marngales and he densy process relang he measures IP N and IP k s provded by we ge from 4.3 ha dip k F = B, T N B, Tk dip N B, Tk B, T N = M u k, 4.8 M u k + δ F k MIP k because + δ F k M u k = M u k MIPN. 4.9

10 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND Smlarly, + δ L k MIP k because + δ L k M u k = M v k MIPN. 4. The monooncy of he sequence u k ogeher wh 2. yelds ha M u k M u k. Moreover, from he nequaly vk u k ogeher wh 2. agan, follows ha M v k M u k, for all k K. Hence, + δ L k + δ F k. Therefore, he OIS raes, he LIBOR raes and he correspondng spreads are non-negave IP k -marngales. Remark 4.4. The above proposons provde he heorecal consrucon of affne LIBOR models wh mulple curves, gven nal erm srucures of OIS bond prces B, Tk and LIBOR raes L k, for any X and k K. The nal erm srucures deermne he sequences u k and v k, bu no n a unque way, as soon as he dmenson of he drvng process s srcly greaer han one, whch wll ypcally be he case n applcaons. Ths provdes pleny of freedom n he mplemenaon of he model. For eample, seng some componens of he vecors u k and v k equal o zero allows o eclude he correspondng componens of he drvng processes and hus decde whch componens of he drvng process X wll affec he OIS raes, respecvely he LIBOR raes. Moreover, f he componens of X are assumed muually ndependen, one can creae a facor model wh common and dosyncrac componens for each OIS and LIBOR rae, as well as varous oher specfc srucures. In Secon 8. we presen more deals on hs ssue, see Remark 8. n parcular. Remark 4.5. Le us now look more closely a he relaonshp beween he sequences vk and u k. Proposons 4. and 4.2 mply ha u k u k and vk u k for all k K. However, we do no know he orderng of vk and u k, or wheher he sequence v k s monoone or no. The marke daa for LIBOR spreads ndcae ha n a normal marke suaon vk u k, u k ]. More precsely, on he one hand, we have vk u k because he LIBOR spreads are nonnegave. On he oher hand, f vk > u k, hen he LIBOR rae would be more han wo mes hgher han he OIS rae spannng an nerval wce as long, sarng a he same dae. Ths conradcs normal marke behavor, hence vk u k, u k ] and consequenly he sequence v k wll also be decreasng. Ths orderng of he parameers vk and u k s llusraed n Fgure 4.3 op graph. However, he normal marke suaon alernaes wh an ereme suaon, where he spread s hgher han he OIS rae. In he boom graph of Fgure 4.3 we plo anoher possble orderng of he parameers vk and u k correspondng o such a case of very hgh spreads. Inuvely speakng, he value of he correspondng model spread depends on he dsance beween he parameers vk and u k, alhough n a non-lnear fashon. The ne resul concerns an mporan propery of he mulple curve affne LIBOR model, namely s analycal racably n he sense ha he model srucure s preserved under dfferen forward measures. More precsely, he process X remans affne under any forward measure, alhough s characerscs become me-dependen. We refer o Flpovć 25 for me-nhomogeneous affne processes. Ths propery plays a crucal role n he dervaon of racable

11 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES = u N u N v N... u k vk u k... u v = u N u N... u k... u v... vn... v k Fgure 4.3. Two possble orderngs of u k and v k. prcng formulas for neres rae dervaves n he forhcomng secons, snce enals ha he law of any collecon of LIBOR raes s known under any forward measure. The resul below s presened n Keller-Ressel e al. 23, cf. eq. 6.4 and s proof, neverheless we nclude a shor proof here for compleeness. In Secon 5 we also provde an alernave proof for he case when X s an affne dffuson. Proposon 4.6. The process X s a me-nhomogeneous affne process under he measure IP k, for every X and k K. In parcular IE k e w,x ] = ep φ k, w + ψ k, w, X, 4. where for every w I k, wh φ k, w := φ ψtn u k + w φ ψtn u k, 4.2a ψ k, w := ψ ψtn u k + w ψ ψtn u k, 4.2b I k, := { } w R d : ψ TN u k + w I T. 4.3 Proof. Usng he densy process beween he forward measures, see 4.8, we have ha IE k e w,x ] F s = IEN e w,x ] M u k /M u k s F s = IE N ep φ TN u k + ψ T N u k + w, X F s ]/M u k s = ep φ TN u k φ T N su k + φ sψ TN u k + w ep ψ s ψ TN u k + w ψ T N su k, X s, 4.4 where he above epecaon s fne for every w I k, ; recall 2.. Ths shows ha X s a me-nhomogeneous affne process under IP k, whle 4. follows by subsung s = n 4.4 and usng he flow equaons 2.5. Remark 4.7. The preservaon of he affne propery of he drvng process under all forward measures s a sably propery shared by all forward prce models n whch he process + δ Fk = B,T k B,Tk s modeled as a deermnsc eponenal ransformaon of he drvng process. Ths s relaed o he densy process of he measure change beween subsequen forward measures gven eacly as dip k dip = B,T k B,T k F B,Tk k B,Tk = +δf k +δ Fk, see 4.8, whch s of he same eponenal form, and guaranees ha when performng a measure change he drvng process remans n he same class. We refer o Eberlen

12 2 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND and Kluge 27 for an eample of a forward prce model drven by a menhomogeneous Lévy process under all forward measures. The models n he spr of he LIBOR marke model LMM, where s raher he forward rae F k whch s modeled as an eponenal, do no possess hs propery. The measure change n hese models yelds he sochasc erms δ F k +δ F k appearng n he characerscs of he drvng process more precsely, n he drf and n he compensaor of he random measure of jumps under any forward measure dfferen from he ermnal one, whch desroys he analycal racably of he model. The racably s ofen re-esablshed by freezng he value of hese erms a her nal value δ Fk +δ Fk an appromaon referred o as freezng he drf. Ths appromaon s wdely known o be unrelable n many realsc sengs; cf. Papapanoleon, Schoenmakers, and Skovmand 22 and he references heren. On he oher hand, n LMMs he posvy of he rae Fk s ensured, whch n general may no be he case n he forward prce models. Due o her specfc consrucon, he affne LIBOR models are able o reconcle boh of hese properes: he posvy of he rae Fk and he srucure preservaon for he drvng process under all forward measures. We refer he neresed reader o a dealed dscusson on hs ssue n Secon 3 of Keller-Ressel e al. 23. Fnally, should be emphaszed ha n he curren marke suaon he observed OIS raes have also negave values, bu hs suaon can easly be ncluded n he affne LIBOR models; cf. Secon 4. below. Remark 4.8 Sngle curve and deermnsc spread. The mulple curve affne LIBOR model easly reduces o s sngle curve counerpar cf. Keller-Ressel e al. 23 by seng v k = u k for all X and k K. Anoher neresng queson s wheher he spread can be deermnsc or, smlarly, wheher he LIBOR rae can be a deermnsc ransformaon of he OIS rae. Consder, for eample, a 2-dmensonal drvng process X = X, X 2 where X s an arbrary affne process and X 2 he consan process.e. X 2 X 2. Then, by seng u k = u,k, and v k = u,k, v 2,k where u,k, v 2,k > we arrve a + δ L k = + δ F k ev 2,k X2. Therefore, he LIBOR rae s a deermnsc ransformaon of he OIS rae, alhough he spread Sk as defned n 3.5 s no deermnsc. In ha case, he mulplcave spread Rk defned n 3.6 s obvously deermnsc. 4.. A model wh negave raes and posve spreads. The mulple curve affne LIBOR model produces posve raes and spreads, whch s conssen wh he ypcal marke observaons. However, n he curren marke envronmen negave raes have been observed, whle he spreads sll reman posve. Negave neres raes as well as spreads, f needed can be easly accommodaed n hs seup by consderng, for eample, affne processes on R d nsead of R d or shfed posve affne processes where suppx a, d wh a <.

13 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 3 In order o llusrae he flebly of he affne LIBOR models, we provde below an eplc specfcaon whch allows for negave OIS raes, whle sll preservng he posve spreads. I s based on a parcular choce of he drvng process and suable assumpons on he vecors u k and v k. Recall from Remark 4.4 ha f he drvng process s muldmensonal, we have a ceran freedom n he choce of he parameers u k and v k when fng he nal erm srucure, ha we shall eplo here. Sarng from he affne LIBOR model n 4.3, we have an epresson for he OIS raes Fk and we wll derve an epresson for he mulplcave spreads R k as defned n 3.6. We choose he mulplcave spreads as a more convenen quany nsead of he addve spreads Sk n 3.5, bu obvously he addve spreads can easly be recovered from he mulplcave spreads and he OIS raes, and vce versa, by combnng 3.5 and 3.6. Moreover, he wo spreads always have he same sgn,.e. Rk f and only f S k. The model specfcaon below allows n addon o ensure he monooncy of he spreads wh respec o he enor lengh, whch s also a feaure ypcally observed n he markes. More precsely, hs means ha for any wo enors T and T 2 such ha T 2 T,.e. such ha δ δ 2, he spreads have he followng propery: for all k K and j K 2 such ha T k, T k T 2 j, T 2 j wh T k = T 2 j, we have R k R 2 j, for all T k. Tha s, he spreads are lower for shorer enor lenghs. For eample, a 3-monh spread s lower han a 6-monh spread for a 6-monh perod sarng a he same me as he 3-monh perod. Accordng o 4.3, he OIS rae Fk, for every X and every k K, s provded by + δ F k u k M = M u k, 4.5 where we noe ha u k = u l, for l such ha Tk = T l. Ths process s a IP k - marngale by consrucon. The mulplcave spreads Rk ake now he form + δ Rk = + δ L k + δ Fk = M vk, 4.6 M u k whch s a IP k -marngale by consrucon. Le us now presen a possble choce of he drvng process whch allows o accommodae Fk R, whle keepng R k R, as well as ensurng he monooncy of he spreads wh respec o he enor lengh. We assume ha he nal erm srucure of forward OIS raes Fk R and of mulplcave spreads Rk R are gven, for every fed and all k K. Moreover, we assume ha he nal spreads are monoone wh respec o he enor,.e. for every wo enors and 2 such ha δ δ 2, we have R k R 2 j, for all k K and j K 2 wh T k = T 2 j. In order o f deas, we shall consder only a 2-dmensonal affne process X = X, X 2 on he sae space R R such ha X and X 2 are ndependen. The consrucon can easly be eended o d-dmensonal affne processes

14 4 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND on R n R m, wh n + m = d, such ha he frs n componens are ndependen of he las m componens. The forward OIS raes wll be drven by boh componens of he drvng process X and for he spreads we shall use only he second componen X 2, whch akes values n R, o ensure he nonnegavy. Ths can be acheved by mposng approprae assumpons on he parameers vk. We spl he consrucon n wo seps. Se. Gven he nal erm srucure of forward OIS raes Fk R, for every fed and all k K, we apply Proposon 4. and fnd a sequence u k R R such ha he model 4.5 fs he nal erm srucure. Noe ha u k, k K, do no have o be ordered and Fk R, for any. Sep 2. Ne, gven he nal erm srucure of mulplcave spreads Rk R, for every fed and all k K, we calculae he nal LIBOR raes L k usng 3.6. Applyng Proposon 4.2 we can fnd a sequence vk R R such ha for each k K, vk = v,k, v 2,k sasfes v,k = u,k and he model 4.6 fs he nal erm srucure. Noe ha even hough we fed here he frs componen v,k of each of he vecors v k, Proposon 4.2 ensures ha he nal erm srucure can be fed usng only he second componens v2,k. Ths yelds v + δ Rk k M = M u k ep φ T N u,k +φ2 T N v 2,k +ψ T N u,k X +ψt 2 N v 2,k X2 = ep φ T N u,k +φ2 T N u 2,k +ψ T N u,k X +ψ2 T N u 2,k X2 ep φ 2 T N v 2,k + ψ2 T N v 2,k X2 =, 4.7 ep φ 2 T N u 2,k + ψ2 T N u 2,k X2 due o he ndependence of X and X 2, see Keller-Ressel 28, Prop Therefore, Rk s drven only by X2 and he fac ha he nal values Rk R mples ha v2,k u 2,k for all k. Consequenly, we have R k R, for all, whch follows mmedaely from 4.7. Fnally, remans o show ha he monooncy of he nal spreads wh respec o he enor R mples he monooncy a all mes, k R 2 j R k R 2 j, for all, 2 and k, j as above. Frs noe ha T k = T 2 T l mples u k = u 2 j = u l and consequenly M u k j = = M u2 j. 4.8 Hence, R k R v 2 j mples ha necessarly M k M v2 j by 4.6. Ths n urn yelds v k v 2 j, or more precsely v 2,k v 2 2,j snce v,k = u,k = u 2,j = v 2,j. As a consequence, R k R 2 j, for all, snce due o δ R k = M v k M u k M v 2 j M u 2 j = + δ R 2 j,

15 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 5 5. Connecon o LIBOR marke models In hs secon, we wll clarfy he relaonshp beween he affne LIBOR models and he classcal LIBOR marke models, cf. Sandmann, Sondermann, and Mlersen 995 and Brace, G aarek, and Musela 997, and also Mercuro 2a for he eenson of he LIBOR marke models o mulple curves. Ths relaonshp has no ye been nvesgaed even n he sngle-curve framework of Keller-Ressel e al. 23. More precsely, we wll embed he mulple curve affne LIBOR model 4.3 n he general semmarngale LIBOR marke model of Jamshdan 997 and derve he correspondng dynamcs of OIS and LIBOR raes. We shall concenrae on affne dffuson processes for he sake of smplcy, n order o epose he deas whou oo many echncal deals. The generalzaon o affne processes wh jumps s sraghforward and lef o he neresed reader. An affne dffuson process on he sae space D = R d s he soluon X = X of he SDE dx = b + BX d + σx dw N, X =, 5. where W N s a d-dmensonal IP N -Brownan moon. The coeffcens b, B = β,..., β d and σ have o sasfy he admssbly condons for affne dffusons on R d, see Flpovć 29, Ch.. Tha s, he drf vecors sasfy b R d, β R and β j R for all, j d, j, 5.2 where β j denoes he j-h elemen of he column vecor β. Moreover, he dffuson mar σ : D R d d sasfes d σzσz T = α z, for all z D, 5.3 = where α are symmerc, posve semdefne marces for all d, such ha α R and α jk = for all, j, k d, j, k. 5.4 Here, α jk denoes he j, k-h enry of he mar α. Therefore, he affne dffuson process X s componenwse descrbed by dx = b + BX d + X σ dw N, 5.5 for all =,..., d, where σ = α e wh e he un vecor. 5.. OIS dynamcs. We sar by compung he dynamcs of OIS raes. As n he prevous secon, we consder a fed X and he assocaed enor srucure T. Usng he srucure of he IP N -marngale M u k n 4., we have ha dm u k = M u k ψ TN u k dx +... d. 5.6 Hence, applyng Iô s produc rule o 4.3 and usng 5.6 yelds ha dfk = d M u k δ M u k = M u k ψtn u δ M u k ψ T N u k dx +... d k = δ + δ F k ψ TN u k ψ T N u k dx +... d.

16 6 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND Therefore, he OIS raes sasfy he followng SDE df k F k = + δ F k δ F k ψtn u k ψ T N u k dx +... d 5.7 for all k = 2,..., N. Now, usng he dynamcs of he affne process X from 5.5 we arrve a dfk Fk = + δ Fk δ Fk = + δ F k δ F k d ψ TN u k ψ T N u k dx +... d = d ψ TN u k ψ T N u k X σ dw N +... d = =: Γ,k dw N +... d, 5.8 where we defne he volaly srucure Γ,k = + δ Fk d ψ δ Fk TN u k ψ T N u k X σ R d. 5.9 = On he oher hand, we know from he general heory of dscreely compounded forward raes cf. Jamshdan 997 ha he OIS rae should sasfy he followng SDE under he ermnal measure IP N dfk N Fk = l=k+ δ F l + δ F l Γ,l, Γ,k d + Γ,k dw N, 5. for he volaly srucure Γ,k gven n 5.9. Therefore, we ge mmedaely ha he IP k -Brownan moon W,k s relaed o he ermnal Brownan moon W N va he equaly W,k := W N = W N N l=k+ N d l=k+ = δ F l + δ F l Γ,l d ψ TN u l ψ T N u l X σ d. 5. Moreover, he dynamcs of X under IP k ake he form dx = b + BX d + X σ dw,k N + σ X d ψ j T N u l ψ j T N u l X j σ jd = l=k+ j= b + BX + N l=k+ ψ TN u l ψ T N u l X σ 2 + X σ dw,k, 5.2 for all =,..., d. The las equaon provdes an alernave proof o Proposon 4.6 n he seng of affne dffusons, snce shows eplcly ha X s a me-nhomogeneous affne dffuson process under IP k. One should also noe d

17 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 7 from 5., ha he dfference beween he ermnal and he forward Brownan moon does no depend on oher forward raes as n classcal LIBOR marke models. As menoned n Remark 4.7, he same propery s shared by forward prce models. Thus, we arrve a he followng IP k-dynamcs for he OIS raes df k F k = Γ,k dw,k 5.3 wh he volaly srucure Γ,k provded by 5.9. The srucure of Γ,k shows ha here s a bul-n shf n he model, whereas he volaly srucure s deermned by ψ and σ LIBOR dynamcs. Ne, we derve he dynamcs of he LIBOR raes assocaed o he same enor. Usng 4.3, 4.2 and repeang he same seps as above, we oban he followng dl k L k = δ L k dm M = δ L k v k M u k vk M u k = + δ L k δ L k ψtn v k ψ T N u k dx +... d d ψ TN vk ψ T N u k X σ dw N +... d, = for all k = 2,..., N. Smlarly o 5.9 we nroduce he volaly srucure Λ,k := + δ L k δ L k d ψ TN vk ψ T N u k X σ R d, 5.4 = and hen oban for L k he followng IP k -dynamcs dl k L k = Λ,k dw,k, 5.5 where W,k s he IP k-brownan moon gven by 5., whle he dynamcs of X are provded by Spread dynamcs. Usng ha Sk = L k F k, he dynamcs of LIBOR and OIS raes under he forward measure IP k n 5.3 and 5.5, as well as he srucure of he volales n 5.9 and 5.4, afer some sraghforward calculaons we arrve a { dsk = Sk Υ vk, u k + + δ Fk } Υ vk δ, u k dw,k, where Υ w, y := d ψ TN w ψt N y X σ. 5.6 =

18 8 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND 5.4. Insananeous correlaons. The dervaon of he SDEs ha OIS and LIBOR raes sasfy allows o provde quckly formulas for varous quanes of neres, such as he nsananeous correlaons beween OIS and LIBOR raes or LIBOR raes wh dfferen maures or enors. We have, for eample, ha he nsananeous correlaon beween he LIBOR raes maurng a Tk s heurscally descrbed by T l herefore we ge ha Corr L k, L l d = = dl k Corr L k, L ] L l = k dl l L l dl k L k dl k dl L k l L l dl l L l ] 5.5 = Λ,k, Λ,l Λ,k Λ,l ψ T N v k ψ TN u k ψ T N and v l ψ TN u l X σ 2 d = ψt 2 N v k ψ TN u k X σ 2 d. = ψt 2 N v l ψ TN u l X σ 2 Smlar epressons can be derved for oher nsananeous correlaons, e.g. Corr F k, L ] k or Corr L k, ] L 2 k. Insananeous correlaons are mporan for descrbng he nsananeous nerdependences beween dfferen LIBOR raes. In he LIBOR marke model for nsance, he rank of he nsananeous correlaon mar deermnes he number of facors e.g. Brownan moons ha s needed o drve he model. Eplc epressons for ermnal correlaons beween LIBOR raes are provded n Append A. 6. Valuaon of swaps and caps 6.. Ineres rae and bass swaps. We sar by presenng a fed-forfloang payer neres rae swap on a noonal amoun normalzed o, where fed paymens are echanged for floang paymens lnked o he LIBOR rae. The LIBOR rae s se n advance and he paymens are made n arrears, whle we assume for smplcy ha he mng and frequency of he paymens of he floang leg concdes wh hose of he fed leg. The swap s naed a me Tp, where X and p K. The collecon of paymen daes s denoed by Tpq := {Tp+ < < T q }, and he fed rae s denoed by K. Then, he me- value of he swap, for Tp, s gven by S K, T pq = k=p+ = δ k=p+ δ B, Tk k IE LT k, Tk K F ] B, Tk L k K. 6.

19 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 9 Thus, he far swap rae K Tpq s provded by K T pq = q k=p+ B, T k L k q k=p+ B, T k. 6.2 Bass swaps are new producs n neres rae markes, whose value reflecs he dscrepancy beween he LIBOR raes of dfferen enors. A bass swap s a swap where wo sreams of floang paymens lnked o he LIBOR raes of dfferen enors are echanged. For eample, n a 3m 6m bass swap, a 3m-LIBOR s pad receved quarerly and a 6m-LIBOR s receved pad semannually. We assume n he sequel ha boh raes are se n advance and pad n arrears; of course, oher convenons regardng he paymens on he wo legs of a bass swap also es. A more dealed accoun on bass swaps can be found n Mercuro 2b, Secon 5.2 or n Flpovć and Trolle 23, Secon 2.4 and Append F. Noe ha n he pre-crss seup he value of such a produc would have been zero a any me pon, due o he no-arbrage relaon beween he LIBOR raes of dfferen enors; see e.g. Crépey, Grbac, and Nguyen 22. Le us consder a bass swap assocaed wh wo enor srucures denoed by T pq := {T <... < T q } and T 2 pq := {T 2 p 2 <... < T 2 q 2 }, where T = T 2 p 2, T q = T 2 q 2 and T 2 pq T pq. The noonal amoun s agan assumed o be and he swap s naed a me T, whle he frs paymens are due a mes T + and T 2 p 2 + respecvely. The bass swap spread s a fed rae S whch s added o he paymens on he shorer enor lengh. More precsely, for he -enor, he floang neres rae LT, T a enor dae T s replaced by LT, T + S, for every { +,..., q }. The me- value of such an agreemen s gven, for T = T 2 p 2, by BS S, T pq, T 2 pq = = q 2 =p 2 + q 2 =p 2 + q = + δ 2 B, T 2 IE 2 LT 2, T ] 2 F δ 2 B, T 2 L 2 δ B, T IE LT, T ] + S F q = + δ B, T L + S. 6.3 We also wan o compue he far bass swap spread S T pq, T 2 pq. Ths s he spread ha makes he value of he bass swap equal zero a me,.e. s obaned by solvng BS S, T pq, T 2 pq =. We ge ha S T pq, T 2 pq = q2 =p 2 + δ 2 B, T 2 L 2 q = + δ B, T L q = + δ B, T. 6.4 The formulas for he far swap rae and bass spread can be used o boosrap he nal values of LIBOR raes from marke daa, see Mercuro 2b, Caps. The valuaon of caples, and hus caps, n he mulple curve affne LIBOR model s an easy ask, whch has compley equal o he compley of he valuaon of caples n he sngle-curve affne LIBOR model; compare wh Proposon 7. n Keller-Ressel e al. 23. There are wo reasons for hs: on

20 2 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND he one hand, he LIBOR rae s modeled drecly, see 4.3, as opposed o e.g. Mercuro 2a where he LIBOR rae s modeled mplcly as he sum of he OIS rae and he spread. In our approach, he valuaon of caples remans a one-dmensonal problem, whle n he laer approach becomes a baske opon on he OIS rae and he spread. On he oher hand, he drvng process remans affne under any forward measure, cf. Proposon 4.6, whch allows he applcaon of Fourer mehods for opon prcng. In he sequel, we wll derve sem-eplc prcng formulas for any mulple curve affne LIBOR model. Le us pon ou ha we do no need o freeze he drf as s cusomary n LIBOR marke models wh jumps see Remark 4.7. Proposon 6.. Consder an -enor caple wh srke K ha pays ou δ LTk, T k K+ a me Tk. The me- prce s provded by C K, T k = B, T k 2π R K R+w Θ W k R w dw, 6.5 R wr w for R, Ĩk,, assumng ha, Ĩk,, where K = + δ K, Θ W k s gven by 6.7, whle he se Ĩk, s defned as { } Ĩ k, = z R : zψ TN Tk u k + zψ T N Tk v k I T. Proof. Usng 3.3 and 4.3 he me- prce of he caple equals C K, Tk = δ B, Tk IE k LT k, Tk K+] = δ B, Tk IE k L k Tk K+] + ] = B, Tk IE k M v k Tk /M u k Tk K + ] = B, Tk IE k e W k K, where Wk = log M v k Tk /M u k Tk = φ TN Tk v k φ T N Tk u k + ψ TN Tk v k ψ T N Tk u k, X Tk =: A + B, X T k. 6.6 Now, usng Eberlen, Glau, and Papapanoleon 2, Thm 2.2, E. 5., we arrve drecly a 6.5, where Θ W k denoes he IP k-momen generang funcon of he random varable Wk,.e. for z Ĩk,, Θ W k z = IE k e zwk ] = IE k ep za + B, XT ] k = ep za + φ k, Tk zb + ψ k, Tk zb, X. 6.7 The las equaly follows from Proposon 4.6, nong ha z Ĩk, mples zb I k,.

21 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 2 7. Valuaon of swapons and bass swapons Ths secon s devoed o he prcng of opons on neres rae and bass swaps, n oher words, o he prcng of swapons and bass swapons. In he frs par, we provde general epressons for he valuaon of swapons and bass swapons makng use of he srucure of mulple curve affne LIBOR models. In he followng wo pars, we derve effcen and accurae appromaons for he prcng of swapons and bass swapons by furher ulzng he model properes, namely he preservaon of he affne srucure under any forward measure, and applyng he lnear boundary appromaon developed by Sngleon and Umansev 22. Smlarly o he prcng of caples, also here we do no have o freeze he drf, whle n specal cases we can even derve closed or sem-closed form soluons cf. Keller-Ressel e al. 23, 8. Le us consder frs a payer swapon wh srke rae K and eercse dae T p on a fed-for-floang neres rae swap sarng a T p and maurng a T q ; hs was defned n Secon 6.. A swapon can be regarded as a sequence of fed paymens δ K T p T pq K + ha are receved a he paymen daes T p+,..., T q ; see Musela and Rukowsk 25, Secon 3..2, p Here K T p T pq s he swap rae of he underlyng swap a me T p, cf Noe ha he classcal ransformaon of a payer resp. recever swapon no a pu resp. call opon on a coupon bond s no vald n he mulple curve seup, snce LIBOR raes canno be epressed n erms of zero coupon bonds; see Remark 3.5. The value of he swapon a me T p S + K, T pq = B, T p = B, Tp IE p =p+ =p+ δ IE p s provded by + ] BTp, T K T p Tpq F K δ L T p BT p, T =p+ δ KBT p, T + F snce he swap rae K T p T pq s gven by 6.2 for = T p. Usng 3.2, 4.3 and a elescopng produc, we ge ha BTp, T = BT p, T BT p, T BTp, T BTp, T 2 BT p, Tp+ BTp, Tp Togeher wh 4.3 for L T p, hs yelds S + K, T pq = B, Tp IE p = B, T N IE N =p+ =p+ M v T p M u p T p M v T p =p+ =p+ = M u Tp. M u p Tp M u F Tp K + M u p Tp + F K M u T p, 7. where K := + δ K and he second equaly follows from he measure change from IP p o IP N as gven n 4.8.

22 22 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND Ne, we move on o he prcng of bass swapons. A bass swapon s an opon o ener a bass swap wh spread S. We consder a bass swap as defned n Secon 6., whch sars a T = T 2 p 2 and ends a T q = T 2 q 2, whle we assume ha he eercse dae s T. The payoff of a bass swap a me T s gven by 6.3 for = T. Therefore, he prce of a bass swapon a me Tp s provded by BS + S, T pq, T 2 pq = B, T IE q = + q 2 =p 2 + δ 2 L 2 T 2 p 2 BT 2 p 2, T 2 δ L T + S BT, T Along he lnes of he dervaon for swapons and usng M u 2 p 2 T 2 p 2 4.5, we arrve a BS + S, T pq, T 2 pq = = B, T IE q = + = B, T N IE N q 2 =p 2 + where S := δ S. M v T M v 2 T 2 p 2 q 2 =p 2 + /M u T M v 2 T 2 p 2 M u 2 T 2 p 2 /M u 2 p 2 T 2 p 2 S M u T /M u q = + M u 2 T 2 T M v T p 2 /M u 2 p 2 T 2 p 2 + F S M u T + F = M u T. cf. + F 7.. Appromaon formula for swapons. We wll now derve an effcen appromaon formula for he prcng of swapons. The man ngredens n hs formula are he affne propery of he drvng process under forward measures and he lnearzaon of he eercse boundary. Numercal resuls for hs appromaon wll be repored n Secon 8.3. We sar by presenng some echncal ools and assumpons ha wll be used n he sequel. We defne he probably measures IP k, for every k K, va he Radon Nkodym densy, 7.2 dip k F = M v k. 7.3 dip N M v k The process X s obvously a me-nhomogeneous affne process under every IP k. More precsely, we have he followng resul whch follows drecly from Proposon 4.6.

23 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 23 Corollary 7.. The process X s a me-nhomogeneous affne process under he measure IP k, for every X, k K, wh IE k e w,x ] = ep φ k, w + ψ k, w, X, 7.4 where for every w I k, wh φ k, w := φ ψtn vk + w φ ψtn vk, 7.5a ψ k, w := ψ ψtn vk + w ψ ψtn vk, 7.5b I k, := { } w R d : ψ TN vk + w I T. 7.6 The prce of a swapon s provded by 7., whle for smplcy we shall consder he prce a me = n he sequel. We can rewre 7. as follows S + K, T pq = B, T N IE N K M u T p {fxt p } = B, T N K =p+ =p+ =p+ IE N M v T p =p+ M v T p {fxt p } IE N M u T {fx T p }], where, recallng 4. and 4.2, we defne he funcon f : R d R by fy = ep φ TN Tp v + ψ TN Tp v, y =p+ =p+ ] 7.7 K ep φ TN T p u + ψ TN T p u, y. 7.8 Ths funcon deermnes he eercse boundary for he prce of he swapon. Now, snce we canno compue he characersc funcon of fx T p eplcly, we wll follow Sngleon and Umansev 22 and appromae f by a lnear funcon. Appromaon S. We appromae fx T p fx T p := A + B, X T p, 7.9 where he consans A, B are deermned accordng o he lnear regresson procedure descrbed n Sngleon and Umansev 22, pp The lne B, X T p = A appromaes he eercse boundary, hence A and B are srkedependen. The followng assumpon wll be used for he prcng of swapons and bass swapons. Assumpon CD. The cumulave dsrbuon funcon of X s connuous for all, T N ].

24 24 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND Le Iz denoe he magnary par of a comple number z C. Now, we sae he man resul of hs subsecon. Proposon 7.2. Assume ha A, B are deermned by Appromaon S and ha Assumpon CD s sasfed. The me- prce of a payer swapon wh srke K, opon maury Tp, and swap maury Tq, s appromaed by S + K, T pq = B, T N K =p+ =p+ M v B, T 2 + π 2 + π where ζ and ξ are defned by 7.4 and 7.5 respecvely. I ξ z dz z I ζ z dz, 7. z Proof. Sarng from he swapon prce n 7.7 and usng he relaon beween he ermnal measure IP N and he measures IP k and IP k n 4.8 and 7.3, we ge ha S + K, T pq = B, T N =p+ ] M v IE {fxt p } K =p+ ] B, T IE {fxt p }. 7. In addon, from he nverson formula of Gl-Pelaez 95 and usng Assumpon CD, we ge ha IE ] {fxt p } = 2 + π IE ] {fxt p } = 2 + π for each K, where we defne ζ z := IE ep zfxt p ] and ξ z := IE Iζ z dz, 7.2 z Iξ z dz, 7.3 z ep zfxt p ]. However, he above characersc funcons canno be compued eplcly, n general, hus we wll lnearze he eercse boundary as descrbed by Appromaon S. Tha s, we appromae he unknown characersc funcons wh ones ha adm an eplc epresson due o he affne propery of X under he forward measures. Indeed, usng Appromaon S, Proposon 4.6 and Corollary 7. we ge ha ζk z ζ k z := k IE ep z fxt ] p = ep za + φ k, T zb + ψ k, p T zb, X, 7.4 p ξk z ξ k z := k IE ep z fxt ] p = ep za + φ k, Tp zb + ψ k, Tp zb, X. 7.5

25 AFFINE LIBOR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE CURVES 25 Afer nserng 7.2 and 7.3 no 7. and usng 7.4 and 7.5 we arrve a he appromaon formula for swapons 7.. Remark 7.3. The prcng of swapons s nherenly a hgh-dmensonal problem. The epecaon n 7. corresponds o a d-dmensonal negral, where d s he dmenson of he drvng process. However, he eercse boundary s nonlnear and hard o compue, n general. See, e.g. Brace e al. 997, Eberlen and Kluge 26 or Keller-Ressel e al. 23, 7.2, 8.3 for some eceponal cases ha adm eplc soluons. Alernavely, one could epress a swapon as a zero srke baske opon wren on 2q p underlyng asses and use Fourer mehods for prcng; see Hubalek and Kallsen 25 or Hurd and Zhou 2. Ths leads o a 2q p-dmensonal numercal negraon. Insead, he appromaon derved n hs secon requres only he evaluaon of 2q p unvarae negrals ogeher wh he compuaon of he consans A, B. Ths reduces he compley of he problem consderably Appromaon formula for bass swapons. In hs subsecon, we derve an analogous appromae prcng formula for bass swapons. Numercal resuls for hs appromaon wll be repored n Secon 8.4. Smlar o he case of swapons, we can rewre he me- prce of a bass swapon 7.2 as follows: BS + S, T pq, T 2 pq = q 2 = B, T N q = + =p 2 + ] IE N M v 2 T 2 p {gx 2 } ] IE N M u 2 2 Tp 2 T 2 p {gx 2 } 2 Tp 2 ] ] IE N M v T {gxt } S IE N M u p T {gxt }, where we defne he funcon g : R d R by gy = q 2 =p 2 + q 2 + =p 2 + q = + q = + ep φ TN T 2 v 2 p 2 + ψ T N T 2 v 2 p 2, y ep φ TN T 2 u 2 p 2 + ψ TN T 2 u 2 p 2, y ep φ TN T v + ψ T N T v, y 7.6 S ep φ TN T u + ψ TN T u, y, 7.7 whch deermnes he eercse boundary for he prce of he bass swapon. Ths wll be appromaed by a lnear funcon followng agan Sngleon and Umansev 22. Appromaon BS. We appromae gx T gx T := C + D, X T, 7.8

26 26 Z. GRBAC, A. PAPAPANTOLEON, J. SCHOENMAKERS, AND D. SKOVMAND where C and D are deermned va a lnear regresson. Proposon 7.4. Assume ha C, D are deermned by Appromaon BS and ha Assumpon CD s sasfed. The me- prce of a bass swapon wh spread S, opon maury T = T 2 p 2, and swap maury T q = T 2 q 2, s appromaed by BS + q 2 S, T pq, T 2 pq = B, T N M v I ξ 2 z dz π z =p 2 + q 2 B, T I ζ 2 z dz π z =p 2 + q B, T N M v 2 + I ξ z dz 7.9 π z = + q + S B, T 2 + I ζ z dz, π z where ζ l = + and ξ l are defned by 7.2 and 7.2 for l =, 2. Proof. Sarng from he epresson for he bass swapon prce gven n 7.6, we follow he same seps as n he prevous secon: Frs, we use he relaon beween he ermnal measure IP N and he measures IP k, IP k o arrve a an epresson smlar o 7.. Second, we appromae g by g n 7.8. Thrd, we defne he appromae characersc funcons, whch can be compued eplcly: ζ l z := IE l ep z gxt l ] p l = ep ξ l z := IE l = ep zc + φ, l T l ep z gxt l zc + φ, l T l zd + ψ, l p l T l ] p l zd, X p l, 7.2 zd + ψ, l p l T l zd, X p, 7.2 l for l =, 2. Fnally, pung all he peces ogeher we arrve a he appromaon formula 7.9 for he prce of a bass swapon. 8. Numercal eamples and calbraon The am of hs secon s wofold: on he one hand, we demonsrae how he mulple curve affne LIBOR model can be calbraed o marke daa and, on he oher hand, we es he accuracy of he swapon and bass swapon appromaon formulas. We sar by dscussng how o buld a model whch can smulaneously f caple volales when he opons have dfferen underlyng enors. Ne, we es numercally he swapon and bass swapon appromaon formulas 7. and 7.9 usng he calbraed models and parameers. In he las subsecon, we buld a smple model and compue eac and appromae swapon and bass swapon prces n a seup whch can be easly reproduced by neresed readers.