arxiv: v2 [q-fin.mf] 21 Jun 2016

Transcription

1 Rearded acion principle and self-financing porfolio dynamics D Lesnik Augus 18, 218 arxiv: v2 [q-fin.mf] 21 Jun 216 Absrac We derive a consisen differenial represenaion for he dynamics of a self-financing porfolio for differen hedging sraegies. In he basis of he derivaion here is he so called rearded acion principle, which represens he causaliy in he evoluion of dependen sochasic variables. We demonsrae his principle on example of a vanilla and a sorage opion. 1 Inroducion In he firs par of his paper we derive an evoluion equaion for a self-financing porfolio consising of a vanilla opion, a dynamically raded linear hedge and a cash accoun. The porfolio is selffinancing in a sense ha i can be considered as isolaed he cash flow is solely generaed by rading he hedge, and here is no exernal source of cash required. We use he evoluion equaion o invesigae he dynamics of he porfolio wih differen hedging sraegies. We will be ineresed in he erminal porfolio disribuion. Obviously, he opion pricing formula does no effec he erminal porfolio value, since a he mauriy i simply becomes equal o he deerminisic pay-off. On he conrary, differen hedging sraegies effec he disribuion and he expeced value of he erminal porfolio: If a rader holds a naked (unhedged) vanilla opion, he erminal value of he porfolio is random, and he expeced porfolio value equals he expeced pay-off, i.e. he probabilisic opion price. The so called risk neural hedging sraegy makes he erminal porfolio equal he risk neural opion price wih arbirarily narrow disribuion. The risk neural porfolio is insensiive o he marke drif, which makes i so special. An arbirary hedge sraegy on a drif-less marke leads o he expeced erminal porfolio value which coincides wih he risk neural porfolio, bu he disribuion depends on he hedging sraegy. On he marke wih drif he expeced value and he disribuion of he erminal porfolio depend on he hedging sraegy. For our analysis we consider hree differen opion pricing formulas Black-Scholes (we will also refer o he BS opion price and hedging sraegy as risk-neural ), probabilisic and inrinsic. Apar from ha we look a differen hedging sraegies, and in paricular, we consider dela hedging corresponding o differen opion pricing formulas. We also show how he opion ime value can be calculaed from he inrinsic hedging sraegy. In he second par we generalise he equaions for he sorage opion, and show how he sorage opion ime value can be calculaed by following he rolling inrinsic hedging sraegy. 1

2 2 Marke wih drif LeF()behepriceofheunderlyingaime. Theunderlyingissupposedofollowageneralised Wiener process wih drif: df(,t) = µ(f,)d+σ(f,)dw. (2.1) For geomeric Brownian moion (GBM) we have µ = µ F, σ = σ F. The drif erm is supposed o be real and saisically significan, unlike he virual drif considered in risk neural pricing heory (see Sec. 2.1). The presence of he drif affecs he ou-urn disribuion, and inroduces a saisical arbirage opporuniies. We will use he following ideniies: df = µ(f,)d df 2 = σ 2 (F,)d (2.2) (2.3) An imporan aspec of he marke wih drif is ha a consisen and saisically significan drif can only be observed on markes incomplee wih limied liquidiy. On he oher hand we will be dealing wih he porfolio evoluion equaion, which is derived under he assumpion, ha he rader performs a coninuous dynamic hedging, which is hardly possible on he illiquid markes. Hence, he resuls for he markes wih drif should be considered as an approximaion, which can only be approached in realiy o he exen allowed by he marke liquidiy. A drif-less marke implies µ =, and hence df =. For he formulas which are derived under assumpion of he drif-less marke we will use he label [no drif] : 2.1 Virual drif and risk neural pricing A sandard opion pricing heory is developed under he assumpion of effecive marke hypohesis, as well as marke compleeness, i.e. liquidiy and absence of marke fricion. Under such condiions any sochasic model of he asse price dynamic mus obey one crucial propery: he corresponding price process should be a maringale Markov process. Any deviaion from maringale propery leads immediaely o he saisical arbirage, which is impossible wihin he framework of efficien liquid marke. I has been observed for a large class of asses ha a ypical behaviour of he asse price has hree major dynamic characerisics drif, diffusion and defauls. The drif characerises a shor erm sysemaic drif of he price, diffusion describes a random zero-mean flucuaions, defauls describe a random occurrence of price drops. For some asses he even of defaul means jump o zero, i.e. he asses ceases exising aferwards. For oher asses he defaul could be only parial, allowing some recovery rae. The simples price process capuring all hree feaures could be represened in he following form df = µd+σdw +dz (2.4) F where µ describes he shor-erm drif, dw describes he diffusion, and dz is a sochasic jumps process, describing he random defaul evens. The maringale condiion yields: µd+ dz = (2.5) Thus he drif erm is no arbirary, bu is deermined by he defauls jump process. This relaion reflecs he well know fac ha riskier asses (i.e. hose asses having bigger defaul rae) have higher shor-erm growh rae. I is common in some financial lieraure o consider he runcaed price process, in which he jumps componen is dropped: df F = µd+σdw (2.6) 2

3 In such runcaed form he equaion is violaing he maringale condiion (o emphasise his we used he symbol =). Despie his shorcoming, in some circumsances he laer model can be useful. Ofen he defauls process has very long expecaion imes beween jumps. In such siuaion Eq. (2.6) gives a good descripion of he price process dynamics on shor imes. The advanage of his equaion lies in is pracicaliy, since i is easily racable analyically, whereas mos of resuls based on he jump-diffusion process are eiher very complicaed, or do no have closed form soluions a all. However, as has been noiced, Eq. (2.6) violaes he maringale condiion, and as a resuls, canno be used for probabilisic opion pricing. Indeed, he expeced price incremen becomes df = µf d which leads o a sysemaic bias in he opion price. The drif erm µ only makes sense if i is compensaed by he defauls jump process. We refer o he value µ as virual drif, o emphasise ha i represens an uncompensaed drif, which violaes he maringale condiion. The disribuion of he ou-urn price following he runcaed evoluion equaion is called real world measure. Ironically i is no describing he measure of he real world, since i conains a sysemaic bias. In order o deal wih he inconsisen price dynamics, a risk-neural pricing heory has been developed. This heory uses he porfolio replicaion approach(dela-hedging sraegy) in order o derive (or beer o say define) he risk neural opion price, which urns ou o be independen on he virual drif. The risk neural price is equivalen o he probabilisic price under he simplified price process df F = σdw This model does no have any shor-erm drif or defauls jump componen. However i preserves he maringale condiion, and in many cases is sufficien for opion pricing. Raher sophisicaed risk-neural pricing heory, a grea deal of which is based on measure heory, is essenially needed o jusify why he virual drif erm should be omied. In our paper we someimes consider a price processes wih drif, such as in Eq. (2.1). We should emphasise ha he drif µ in his case is no virual drif, bu a rue observable and saisically significan drif. As has been noiced previously, he drif is only possible in markes wih limied liquidiy, which does no allow he majoriy of marke paricipans o ake and advanage of he saisical arbirage. Marke wih limied liquidiy does no have o saisfy he maringale condiion. The opion pricing in his siuaion becomes raher ambiguous, since i depends on he hedging sraegy. Whaever he hedging sraegy is chosen, we use he probabilisic approach o derive he opion price. (2.7) 3 Averaging We will be dealing wih averaging over he sochasic price process. In his regard we need o make some commens abou he noaion. Le f(,f) be some funcion of he price process F() and ime. An average of f is an expeced value of f as a funcion of random variable F(T), given he iniial condiion F(). We denoe his average as f F which is shor for f(,f()) F F. Here F is a filraion generaed by Brownian moion. A differenial incremen df can be expressed in erms of F and he Brownian driver differenial dw. We can define an averaging over dw under filraion F. We designae he average over dw as df dw 3

4 which is shor for df(f,dw) F dw. A differenial of any explici funcion of F becomes a funcion of dw, so we designae he average over dw as df dw Noice ha under filraion F he differenial df(,f) is a funcion of wo randomvariables F() and dw, and hence he average df() dw is a random variable. Thus for differenial expressions we can inroduce a full average, which includes averaging over he incremen dw and over he sochasic variable F(). df F,dW = df dw F Asanexampleconsideradifferenialformhdg, whereh(,f) isafuncion ofhe sochasicprocess F, and dg is a funcion of F and dw. When averaging over dw, he funcion h can be aken ou of he averaging bracke: hdg dw = h dg dw For he full average we ge: hdg = h dg dw F In his case he averaging over F canno be facorised, as boh values h and dg dw are funcions of F. In paricular hdf = hµ F d Noice ye anoher useful expression valid for he drif-less price process: [no drif] : hdf = h df dw F = We will omi he subscrip for he averaging bracke, if i is obvious from he conex wha is mean. Usually we will mean a full average for he expressions like g or hdg, and an average over dw for he expressions like dg or df. 4 Porfolio value funcion Le us consider a porfolio consising of a vanilla opion expiring a some ime T e, a linear hedge posiion h() and a cash accoun P(). We designae H() he value of he hedge posiion. Le also C(F,) be he opion price. I should be sressed, ha C(F,) does no imply any paricular pricing formula, e.g. Black-Scholes. The only requiremen o he opion price is ha a mauriy i coincides wih he opion pay-off C(F,T e ) = K(F) As discussed in he inroducion, we consider hree differen special cases of he opion price risk-neural, inrinsic and probabilisic. The porfolio value is defined as Π() = C()+H()+P() (4.1) I is imporan o undersand ha our definiion of he porfolio value is no he same as he porfolio marke price, i.e. in general case Π() is no he price a which he porfolio could (or should) be bough or sold on he marke. Indeed, even in a liquid drif-less marke we know ha a correc marke price of porfolio is obained by using BS opion pricing formula. The inrinsic call opion price disregards he opion ime value, and hence he corresponding porfolio value underesimaes is marke price. However a he ime of opion expiry all opion pricing formulas 4

5 agree, since hey coincide wih he opion pay-off. The erminal porfolio value is hus independen on he opion pricing formula. I simply equals he sum of he opion pay-off and he cumulaive cash flow from he hedge rades. In illiquid markes wih drif he noion of porfolio marke price is no well defined a all. Firsly, he price is no observed on he marke because he marke is illiquid. The price is no well defined mahemaically eiher. Indeed, he erminal porfolio disribuion, mean and variance, depend on he hedging sraegy. A risk neural sraegy has vanishing risk (here is always some residual risk caused by marke incompleeness and lack of liquidiy). However here exis oher sraegies, ha lead o a higher expeced profi, which comes in a package wih an irreducible risk. A rader wih some risk appeie migh consider he risky sraegy more aracive. Thus he fair price doesn exis, as differen raders who have differen risk profile, have differen view on he fair price. In conras, he porfolio value Π() is well defined. The erminal porfolio disribuion provides a deailed informaion abou he expeced profi and associaed risk, and so we will be ineresed in analysing he erminal porfolio value disribuion. In paricular, he expeced erminal porfolio value will be our main focus. Le f(f,) be he risk-neural, g(f,) be he probabilisic, and I(F) be he inrinsic opion price. We consider hree definiions of he porfolio: risk-neural Π rn = f(f,)+h()+p() (4.2) probabilisic Π p = g(f,)+h()+p() (4.3) and inrinsic Π i = I(F)+H()+P() (4.4) In all hree cases considered above he iniial porfolio value is differen, and defined by he iniial opion price H() = (4.5) P() = (4.6) Π() = C(F,) (4.7) The erminal opion value does no depend on he pricing formula, as i coincides a expiry wih he pay-off K(F) C(F,T e ) = f(f,t e ) = g(f,t e ) = I(F,T e ) = K(F) The expeced erminal opion value is nohing else bu he expeced pay-off, and hence coincides wih he iniial probabilisic opion value C(F,T e ) = K(F) = g() (4.8) which is valid for any opion price formula, e.g. f(t e ) = g(t e ) = I(T e ) = g() Terminal porfolio value depends on he erminal opion price and on he cash flow generaed by he hedge rades. Terminal porfolio value is a random variable (excep for he risk-neural hedge sraegy). So we can speak of he erminal porfolio disribuion. We designae Π e = Π(T e ) This value is correcly defined, as Π(T e ) doesn depend on he opion pricing formula. In paricular, we will be ineresed in he expeced value Π e. 5

6 As will be shown below, in he drif-less marke he expeced value Π e does no depend on he hedging sraegy, and coincides wih he risk-neural opion value. The sandard deviaion on he oher hand depends on he hedging sraegy. The only risk-neural sraegy leads o zero sandard deviaion. In he markewih drif boh expeced value Π e and sandarddeviaion Π 2 e areaffeced byhe hedging sraegy. Risk-neural hedging sraegy gives rise o risk-neural erminal value and zero sandard deviaion. Oher hedging sraegies give rise o differen expeced value and sandard deviaion of Π e. 5 Dynamics of he porfolio componens In his secion we consider he evoluion equaion governing he porfolio dynamics. Everywhere below we assume zero ineres rae, which is equivalen o using a risk-less bond as a numeraire. A ransiion o a currency unis can be made by a change of variables (see App. A). 5.1 Hedge value dynamics The value of he hedge is defined as H() = h()f() (5.1) where F is he spo price, and h is he hedge posiion. For simpliciy of noaion we omi he ime argumen where i does no lead o an ambiguiy. Boh h and F are sochasic variables. The differenial incremen of he hedge is given by he Io rule dh = hdf +F dh+dhdf = hdf +(F +df)dh. (5.2) The firs expression in he righ hand side is symmeric wih respec o boh variables, bu he second expression can be given a meaningful inerpreaion. The erm h df reflecs he change of he hedge value due o he change in he forward price. The second erm (F +df)dh corresponds o he addiional value associaed wih updaing he hedge posiion. Since he new hedge is calculaed afer he price change is observed, he correcion of he hedge posiion dh has o be purchased a he new price F +df. 5.2 Cash accoun dynamics and rearded acion principle The dynamics of he cash accoun resuls from he changing hedge posiion. The differenial incremen of he cash accoun is given by dp = (F +df)dh (5.3) We refer o his relaion as rearded acion principle. I reflecs he fac ha he hedge posiion is updaed afer he change of price is observed. Rearded acion principle is a differenial represenaion of he self-financing porfolio. 1 1 Rearded acion principle reflecs causaliy. The marke price incremen df is by definiion an independen sochasic variable. On he conrary, he hedge incremen dh is defined by he hedge sraegy, and hence is a funcion of ime and marke observables: dh = dh(,f,df). Thus, beween he price incremen df and hedge incremen dh here is a causal relaionship he laer is a funcion of he former, bu no he oher way round. However, an observer who is given a sequence of observaions of df and dh for successive ime momens, would no be able o ell which of he variables is a funcion of anoher. Symmeric expression of he hedge value differenial dh conains no informaion abou he cause and effec relaionship beween df and dh. The expression for dp is in urn asymmeric, and reflecs he causaliy: he incremen dh is calculaed afer he incremen df is observed, and his leads o appearance of an addiional erm df dh in he cash flow differenial. Noice ha he causaliy is only a feaure of he Wiener process, since he addiional erm in he cash flow is quadraic, and would be disregarded in an ordinary differenial calculus. 6

7 The expression (5.3) is derived in such a way ha he hedge porfolio does no change due o he change of hedge posiion. Indeed, he combinaion of he hedge wih he cash accoun has he following dynamics d(h +P) = hdf (5.4) This expression does no conain he erm proporional o dh, which can be considered as a formal definiion of rearded acion principle. Eq. (5.4) in paricular implies ha opening or closing he hedge posiion has no impac on he porfolio, even if dh is no infiniesimally small. Noice ha in a drif-less marke he hedge on average earns no money: [no drif]: d(h +P) dw = h df dw = (5.5) The relaion beween expeced hedge and cash flow incremens [no drif]: dh dw = dp dw (5.6) will be used laer in applicaion o sorage opion. In presence of he marke drif he expeced drif of he hedge porfolio does no vanish, and gives a non-rivial conribuion o he enire porfolio evoluion. 5.3 Opion price dynamics Using Io rule we can wrie dc = Ċd+C df C df 2 (5.7) where we designaed Ċ = C, C = C F, C = 2 C F 2 This evoluion equaion is valid for any opion pricing formula, provided i can be expressed as a funcion of and F. Below we will consider special cases of risk neural, probabilisic and inrinsic opion prices. 5.4 Full porfolio dynamics Taking ino accoun Eq. (5.4), he full porfolio dynamics becomes dπ = dc +hdf (5.8) Subsiuing he expression for he opion differenial, we obain dπ = Ċd+(C +h)df C df 2 (5.9) As discussed before, he iniial porfolio value coincides wih he opion price Π() = C() This value is correcly defined in a sense ha seing up of an iniial hedge has zero cos: H(+)+P(+) = h()df = and hence he porfolio experiences no disconinuiy a he firs ime momen. The erminal porfolio value is obained by inegraing Eq. (5.8) over he ime: Π e = C(T e )+ hdf (5.1) 7

8 In he drif-less marke he average of he second erm vanishes, and we obain for he expeced value [no drif]: dπ() dw = dc dw (5.11) Π e = C(T e ) = g() (5.12) The expeced erminal porfolio value is solely deermined by he opion pay-off and by he erminal disribuion of he underlying. In he marke wih drif he erm hdf does no vanish, so he expeced erminal porfolio value becomes Π e = C(T a ) + hdf = g()+ h df (5.13) Thus he erminal porfolio value depends on he hedging sraegy. Below we consider a few examples. 5.5 Dela-hedged porfolio dynamics A dela hedging sraegy is defined as h() = C () (5.14) Noice ha his sraegy depends on how he opion price is defined. Below we consider hree differen dela-hedging sraegies risk-neural (corresponding o he risk-neural opion price), drif-adjused (corresponding o he probabilisic opion price) and inrinsic (corresponding o he inrinsic opion price). We will use ha o denoe he special case of dela hedged porfolio: ˆΠ Dela hedged porfolio obeys he following dynamics dˆπ = Ċd+ 1 2 C df 2 (5.15) The incremen of he dela hedged porfolio does no depend on df, and hence is deerminisic under filraionf. 2 Noice ha he delahedged porfoliois deerminisic regardlessofhe opion pricing formula. This is a consequence of our definiion of he porfolio value (see Sec. 4). 6 Hedging sraegies 6.1 Risk-neural dela hedging For he risk neural opion price he porfolio dynamics is given by dπ rn = df +hdf = f d+(f +h)df f df 2 The risk neural opion value f(f,) can be derived according he following logic. Le us use a risk neural dela hedging sraegy h = f 2 We poin ou ha he objec df 2 can formally be considered as deerminisic, which is a jargon adoped in Io calculus. In he discree ime for any arbirarily small bu fixed ime incremen d he value df is a random number, and so is df 2. However in he coninuous ime framework he sandard deviaion of he inegral df 2 vanishes in he limi of d. For his reason we can formally hink of df 2 as being deerminisic. 8

9 Then he porfolio dynamics becomes dˆπ rn = f d+ 1 2 f df 2 (6.1) This expression is deerminisic (i.e. risk-less) under filraion F. The no free lunch argumen of he risk neural pricing heory is ha he risk-less porfolio should be consan. Thus he risk neural opion price should obey he relaion f d+ 1 2 f df 2 = (6.2) known as Black Scholes equaion. If he opion price is defined by he BS equaion, and if one follows he dela hedging sraegy, hen he porfolio value is consan: dˆπ rn, ˆΠrn (T e ) = ˆΠ rn (). This is he remarkable propery of he risk neural pricing heory: by dela hedging he porfolio can be made risk-less and independen on he marke drif. Anoher propery of he risk neural hedging is ha he hedge replicaes he opion evoluion. Indeed, from dπ rn = df +dh +dp = we ge dh +dp = df (6.3) which means ha he hedge par of he porfolio replicaes he behaviour of he opion wih he opposie sign. I is worh emphasising ha for a finie ime sep he lef hand side of Eq. (6.2) is a zero-mean sochasic variable f f F 2 = ε, ε = and hence he replicaion formula (6.3) is only valid up o he random variable ε. More accurae replicaion can be achieved by hedging wih non-linear producs ha would replicae opion gamma f and opion hea f. Noicing ha Π rn () = f() and on he drif-less marke Π e = g(), we conclude [no drif]: g() = f() Thus he risk neural opion price coincides wih he probabilisic price if he marke dynamics is drif-less. Le us now consider a porfolio which uses BS opion price bu an arbirary hedging sraegy. Taking ino accoun BS equaion, he opion price evoluion can be represened as df = f df (6.4) and hence for an arbirary hedging sraegy we obain: dπ rn = (f +h)df (6.5) Inegraing over he ime and averaging yields Π e = Π rn ()+ (f +h)df = f()+ Averaging he squared expression for Π e we obain Π 2 e = x( 1 )x( 2 )µ( 1 )µ( 2 ) d 1 d 2 + where x = f h (f +h)µ d x 2 σ 2 d 9

10 The expressionsfor Π e and Π 2 e allowo calculaeheinfluence ofanarbiraryhedgingsraegy on he erminal porfolio disribuion in presence of he marke drif. These expressions, simple hough hey may look, involve averaging over he price pah scenarios F(), which requires h o be expressed as an explici funcion of F. If h is a funcional on F, hen he averaging over he realisaions of he price pahs will involve pah inegrals, and he enire calculaion may become highly non-rivial. As an example of a slighly more ineresing hedging sraegy le s consider a bid-offer opimised hedging. This hedging sraegy is a rule a every ime sep o only parially updae he hedge posiion in order o balance beween he risk of unhedged par of he porfolio and he cos of marke fricion. This sraegy could be modelled by he following equaion dh = k(h+f )d wih some consan k. Obviously { h() for k = h() = f for k Inegraing over ime we obain h() = h()e k k e k( u) f (u)du The opion dela f can be explicily expressed as a funcion of F f () f (,F()) Thus he hedge posiion becomes a funcional h[f()]. Esimaion of he erminal porfolio disribuion for his hedging sraegy would require calculaion of pah inegrals. 6.2 Drif-adjused dela hedging We sar wih he differenial expression for he probabilisic opion value g: dg = ġd+g df g df 2 (6.6) The probabilisic opion value has a propery of zero expeced drif dg = (6.7) This propery follows from he probabilisic opion price definiion. Indeed, for he wo arbirary ime momens 1 and 2 > 1 we have g( 1 ) = g e F 1 = df e P(F e F 1 )K(F e ) = df 2 P(F 2 F 1 ) df e P(F e F 2 )K(F e ) = = g( 2 ) F 1 where x y is an expecaion of x condiional on y, P(x 1 x ) is a probabiliy disribuion funcion of x 1 condiional on x. We also designaed g e = g(t e ),F e = F(T e ),F 1 = F( 1 ),F 2 = F( 2 ). From he laer equaion follows dg = g(+d) g() =. By averaging he expression for dg over dw, we find ġd+g df g df 2 = (6.8) In he drif-less marke df =, and g obeys he same BS equaion wih he same erminal boundary condiion as he risk neural opion price. Thus, as expeced, he probabilisic opion price coincides wih he risk neural price. 1

11 From Eqs. (6.6, 6.8) we obain dg = g (df df ) (6.9) (compare his wih Eq. (6.4)). The porfolio dynamics follows as dπ p = (g +h)df g df (6.1) Averaging his expression over dw yields dπ p = h df Hence he probabilisic porfolio has a drif, and here exiss no hedging sraegy (apar from a rivial one) ha would eliminae he drif. 3 Drif-adjused dela hedging sraegy is defined as h = g (6.11) I gives rise o he following hedged porfolio dynamics dˆπ p = g df (6.12) Similarly o he risk neural porfolio, he dela hedged porfolio incremen is deerminisic. Bu unlike he risk neural one, he probabilisic porfolio has a drif. The no free lunch argumen does no apply here for he following reason. For he risk-neural porfolio dynamics he opion price followed from he no free lunch argumen. However in case of drif-adjused porfolio he opion pricing formula is been posulaed (which is in line wih our porfolio value definiion). The erminal value of he dela hedged porfolio is given by ˆΠ e = ˆΠ Te p () g df = ˆΠ Te p () g µ d (6.13) This is a sochasic value, since boh g and df can be expressed as explici funcions of he price F. The expecaion value of he erminal porfolio is obained by averaging over he price pah scenarios. In case of an arbirary hedging sraegy he porfolio incremen averaged over dw is given by dπ p dw = h df = hµ d Thus he expecaion value of he erminal porfolio is given by Π e = Π p ()+ hdf = Π p ()+ h µ d (6.14) where he averaging is performed over he price scenarios. Depending on he drif direcion and hedging sraegy, he expeced erminal porfolio value can be made arbirary large. A pifall of his feaure is ha he erminal porfolio is a random number. Porfolio possesses an irreducible risk, which can only be minimised by approaching o he risk neural hedging sraegy, and giving up he opporuniy of a higher profi. 6.3 Rolling inrinsic dela hedging Inrinsic opion price is characerised by no explici ime dependence. The evoluion of he opion price is hus given by di = I df I df 2 3 The porfolio has an irreducible drif because we used he probabilisic opion price as par of he porfolio. This porfolio has a differen saring poin, and an irreducible drif if compared o he risk neural porfolio. 11

12 Subsiuing he laer equaion ino he formula (5.9) we obain dπ i = (I +h)df I df 2 (6.15) Inrinsic dela hedging sraegy is defined as h = I The evoluion of he dela hedged porfolio becomes dˆπ i = 1 2 I df 2 i.e. is driven by he inrinsic opion gamma. Inegraing dˆπ i over he ime and averaging yields ˆΠe ˆΠ i () = 1 I df 2 (6.16) 2 The iniial value of he porfolio equals iniial inrinsic opion value I(). The expeced value of he erminal porfolio ˆΠe under he risk neural measure equals an expeced opion pay-off (see Eq. (5.12)), which is equal o he risk neural opion price. Thus he risk neural opion ime value can be calculaed as [no drif]: V T = 1 2 I df 2 = di (6.17) In he las inegral he averaging is full, i.e. over dw and F Call opion ime value Here we suppose ha he marke has no drif df =. Le us consider a european call opion. The inrinsic opion price is given by I(F) = (F K)θ[F K] (6.18) where θ[x] is he Heaviside funcion, F is he spo price and K is he srike. The variaion of he inrinsic opion price is easy o calculae: di = θ[f K]dF δ[f K]dF2 (6.19) where δ[x] is he Dirac dela funcion. The firs and second order erms give opion dela and gamma: I = θ[f K], I = δ[f K] (6.2) The dynamics of he inrinsically hedged porfolio becomes dˆπ i = 1 2 δ[f K]dF2. (6.21) Noice ha for he rolling inrinsic sraegy he porfolio value is sricly growing. This resul is known by raders, and is someimes used as a conservaive rading sraegy, since PnL (hough ˆΠ i underesimaes he marke value of he porfolio) is never decreasing. By inegraing dˆπ i over ime and averaging, we obain he opion ime value as V T = 1 2 δ[f K]dF 2 (6.22) We perform he explici calculaion for demonsraion purpose in appendix B. 12

13 7 Generalisaion for a sorage opion on a drif-less marke Le be he observaion ime, and T be he delivery ime. Le F (T) be he forward price observed on ime wih delivery on ime T. F (T) as a funcion of T is called forward curve. In his secion we consider a drif-less marke. The forward curve is supposed o follow a maringale coninuous sochasic process wih independen incremens, for insance df (T) F (T) = σdw, df (T) Paricular form of he process does no play a role. Here df (T) is a variaion associaed wih he ime incremen d and considered as a funcion of T. Generally for any funcion f (T) we will be using variaion denoed as df (T) or δf (T) and defined as an incremen over he ime inerval d: δf (T) = f +d (T) f (T) Le T e be he sorage conrac duraion, such ha [,T e ] On every ime momen he hedge posiion is a funcion of delivery ime: h (T) The value of he hedge is defined as H() = h (T)F (T)dT (7.1) This definiion implies ha he value of he linear forward conrac a ime wih delivery a ime T is assigned o he curren ime. In realiy he acual cash flow for he fuure conrac may ake place a some oher ime. However i is irrelevan from mahemaical perspecive. The laer definiion is chosen for convenience. We agree ha by definiion he iniial hedge equals zero: h (T), H() = The incremen of he hedge value is given by ( ( ) ) dh() = h ()F ()d+ h (T)δF (T)+ F (T)+δF (T) δh (T) dt (7.2) where δf (T) and δh (T) are he variaions corresponding o he observaion ime incremen d. The firs erm is nohing else bu he exercise rade he promp par of he hedge porfolio which becomes physical. The value of he hedge becomes smaller by he exercise rade due o he shorening ime horizon. The exercise rade should also be refleced in he changing opion value. The incremen of he cash accoun according o he rearded acion principle is given by ( ) dp() = F (T)+δF (T) δh (T)dT (7.3) Noice ha here is no cash flow associaed wih he exercise rade, as he corresponding underlying has been paid for on he fuure marke during he hedging. We define he exercise rade as de() = h ()F ()d, E() = (7.4) where F () is he spo price on ime. 13

14 Le C() be he price of he sorage opion for he remaining ime horizon [,T e ] calculaed wih iniial condiions on. For he enire porfolio incremen we hus obain: dπ() = dc() de()+ h (T)δF (T)dT (7.5) Comparing he laer expression wih Eq. (5.8) we noice ha he sorage porfolio dynamics has one addiional erm de. The iniial porfolio value coincides wih he iniial opion price Π() = C() (7.6) This is obvious since seing up of he iniial hedge coss nohing: H(+)+P(+) = h ()F ()d+ [h (T)δF (T)]dT = where we used h (T). The porfolio experiences no jump due o he seing up of he iniial hedge, and hence is correcly defined a ime =. The erminal opion value is obviously zero C(T e ) = Now averaging Eq. (7.5) and inegraing over he ime yields Π e = de = E(T e ) (7.7) where we made use of he drif-less marke assumpion. The conclusion from his expression is he following. The expeced erminal porfolio value is solely defined by he exercise rades, and is no affeced by he hedge rades. Hedge only has an impac on he disribuion of he erminal porfolio around he expeced value. For a sorage opion here exiss an opimal exercise sraegy, which maximises he expeced opion value. A subopimal exercise sraegy leads o an irreducible loss of he expeced opion value. Nex we inroduce he arge funcion S() = C() E() (7.8) wih boundary condiions S() = C() (7.9) S(T e ) = E(T e ) = Π e (7.1) Wih his definiion he porfolio dynamics can be wrien as dπ() = ds()+ h (T)δF (T)dT (7.11) which is he sorage opion generalisaion of Eq. (5.8). Using drif-less assumpion, we find dπ dw = ds dw (7.12) The arge funcion is an ordinary funcion of ime, and a funcional on he forward curve F (T), and hence he full differenial can be expressed by a generalised Io formula ds() = S d+ δs δf(u) δf(u)du+ 1 2 δ 2 S δf(u)δf(v)dudv (7.13) δf(u)δf(v) 14

15 In he laer formula and below we omi he subscrip for simpliciy of noaion, e.g. δf(u) implies δf (u). Combining he expression for ds wih Eq. (7.11) and inroducing he correlaion funcion Λ (u,v) = 1 d δf (u)δf (v) (7.14) we obain for he porfolio dynamics dπ = S d+ ( ) δs δf(u) +h(u) δf(u)du+ d 2 δ 2 S δf(u)δf(v) Λ(u,v)dudv This formula is a sorage opion generalisaion of he porfolio evoluion equaion (5.9) for a vanilla opion. Here S/ represens opion Thea, funcional derivaive δs/δf(u) represens opion Dela, and second funcional derivaive δ 2 S/δF(u)δF(v) represens opion Gamma. Dela hedge is defined as h (T) = δs δf (T) This is a coninuous ime analogue of he vanilla opion dela hedge. For he dynamics of he dela-hedged porfolio we obain dˆπ = S d d+ 2 This is an analogue of Eq. (5.15). δ 2 S Λ(u,v)dudv (7.15) δf(u)δf(v) 7.1 Risk neural pricing Suppose ha C() represens a risk neural sorage opion price over he ime horizon [,T e ]. In his case we can follow he same logic as for he risk neural vanilla opion pricing. Since he dela hedged porfolio incremen is deerminisic (under filraion F ), i is no exposed o he marke risk, and hence should be consan. We hus obain S δ 2 S Λ(u,v) dudv = (7.16) δf(u)δf(v) This is a coningen claim generalisaion of Black Scholes equaion. Formally his is an inegrodifferenialequaiononaninfiniely-dimensionalfuncions,consideredasafuncionofandf (T) for all possible values of T. A any ime, given he forward curve F (T), funcional S[,F (T)] equals he sorage opion value, in a similar way as he funcion f(,f()) equals a vanilla opion price for he given ime and spo price F(). Noicing ha he ime derivaive S/ is he sorage opion hea, whereas he second variaional derivaive δ 2 S/δF(u)δF(v) represens he sorage opion gamma, he BS equaion esablishes a link beween hea and gamma in exacly he same way i does for a vanilla opion. Taking BS equaion ino accoun, he dela hedged porfolio dynamics becomes rivial dˆπ For an arbirary hedging sraegy he porfolio dynamics becomes ( ) δs dπ = δf(u) +h (u) δf(u) du (7.17) This equaion allows o esimae he porfolio drif and variance dπ = dπ 2 = d ( ) ( ) δs δs δf(u) +h (u) δf(v) +h (v) Λ(u,v) dudv provided S can be expressed explicily as a funcional on F (T). 15

16 7.2 Rolling inrinsic sraegy In his secion we consider a rolling inrinsic sorage opion pricing and hedging sraegy. The rolling inrinsic sraegy is defined as follows. For every observaion ime here is a forward curve F (T) observed on he marke. If he sorage level a ime is q(), hen we can solve an inrinsic opimisaionproblem for he remainingime horizon[,t e ] wih iniial condiion q(). Le us designae he inrinsic opimal exercise sraegy calculaed a ime as q in (,T). We inerpre here q(,t) is a funcion of ime T, paramerised by he observaion ime. The ime derivaive is aken wih respec o T: q in (,T) = q in (,T)/ T. For simpliciy of noaion we will designae r (T) = q in (,T) The inrinsic sorage opion value can be expressed simply as I() = r (T)F (T)dT (7.18) This inegral represens he fuure profi calculaed wih he curren forward curve on inrinsic exercise profile. According o he rolling inrinsic sraegy he hedge posiion a ime is defined as h (T) = δi δf (T) = r (T) and he exercise rade de() = r ()F ()d For he correc opion pricing i is crucial ha he exercise rade is opimal. I has been shown in [1] ha he opimal sorage exercise coincides in he leading order wih he inrinsic exercise. This jusifies using he rolling inrinsic sraegy for esimaing he expeced sorage opion value. The iniial value of I provides he sorage opion inrinsic value I() = V in The erminal value of I is obviously zero: I(T e ) = The exercise E() is given by inegraing he exercise rades E() = r τ (τ)f τ (τ)dτ This inegral represens he value of he closed rades. Here we used ha he iniial value of E is zero E() =. The expeced erminal value of E represens he expeced opion value wih he opposie sign (see Eq. (7.7)). E(T e ) = Π e Now for he arge funcion S = I E we have S() = V in S(T e ) = Π e (7.19) (7.2) Hence, he ime value can be obained as V T = ds F,dW, (7.21) 16

17 Nex we noice ha he arge funcion S depends on only hrough he limis of he inegraion in E and I. I is easy o see ha and hence I = E = r ()F () S = Finally we obain he evoluion equaion for he arge funcion ds() = δs d δf(u)du+ δf(u) 2 Now averaging and aking ino accoun ha δf we obain ds() = d 2 The ime value follows as V = d δ 2 S δf(u)δf(v) Λ(u,v) dudv 1 2 δ 2 S δf(u)δf(v) Λ(u,v) δ 2 S Λ(u,v) dudv (7.22) δf(u)δf(v) du dv (7.23) This expression allows o calculae he ime value if he arge funcion can be expressed as an explici funcional of he forward curve F(T). We can obain anoher expression for he ime value which conains he variaion of he opimal inrinsic sraegy δr (T) = r +d (T) r (T). In order o do so, we noice ha he closed par E() of he arge funcion is consan wih respec o he forward curve variaion (he variaion of he forward curve impacs only he fuure values of he curve F(,T) for T > ), and hence ds = ði, (7.24) where we designaed ð he variaion which should be calculaed for consan ime. Thus V T = ði. Nex we observe ha he hedge value coincides wih he negaive inrinsic opion value: (7.25) H() = and hence r (T)F (T)dT = I(), ði = ðh = dp (7.26) where P is he cumulaive cash flow from he hedge rades. The second relaion follows from he definiions of H and dp, if we ake ino accoun ha δf and ha he variaion ð keeps he inegraion limis consan. Thus he ime value can be calculaed as V T = dp. I can also be shown by direc calculaion, ha he expeced cumulaive cash flow from he hedge rades yields he opion ime value (see Appendix C). 17

18 Subsiuing he definiion of dp: dp() = (F +δf)δr dt we finally obain he ime value as [ Te ] Te V T = (F +δf)δr dt (7.27) where he averaging is full. This expression allows o calculae he sorage opion ime value, provided we know an analyic expression for he opimal inrinsic exercise sraegy r (T). Generally, he exercise sraegy r (T) is funcional on he forward curve F (T). The variaion of he inrinsic exercise δr should hen be expressed in erms of he forward curve variaion δf. Afer averaging, he firs order erms wih respec o δf vanish. Thus, he ime value will be expressed in erms of he correlaion funcion Λ (u,v). 18

19 APPENDICES A Change of variables for ineres rae Everywhere in he main ex he prices are expressed in unis of a risk-less bonds, and hence no ineres rae is presen in any evoluion expression. In order o change o he unis of a currency whose value decreases a he rae r, we need o inroduce he following change of variables (we use bar o denoe new variables): 1. All values having unis of currency, e.g. spo price F, opion price f, ec., are scaled as F = e r F f = e r f (A.1) (A.2) 2. Considering he ime as one of he independen variables, we formally inroduce a new ime =. The parial derivaives are replaced according o = +r F F F = er F 2 F 2 = e2r 2 F 2 (A.3) (A.4) (A.5) B Vanilla Call Opion Time Value We depar from he formula (6.22) V T = 1 2 Le F() follow GBM: δ[f K]dF 2 (B.1) df() F() = σdw ; (B.2) The square of his expression yields df 2 = σ 2 F 2 d. (B.3) and hus Γ = 1 d di F,dW = σ2 2 P(F,) = 1 F 1 σ 2π exp δ[f K] F 2 F Now o calculae value Γ, we need o average his expression over he sochasic price F. Le P(F,) be he probabiliy densiy funcion of F a ime. For GBM i reads ( ln F F + σ2 2 ) 2 2σ 2 ; (B.4) For Γ we obain Γ = P(x,) σ2 x 2 δ[x K] dx = σ2 K 2 P(K,); 2 2 (B.5) 19

20 Subsiuing P we finally obain Γ = σk 2 1 exp 2π ( ln K F + σ2 2 ) 2 2σ 2 ; (B.6) The ime value V T is obained by inegraing Γ over he ime horizon: V T = Γd (B.7) B.1 Inegraion of Γ The change of variables y = ; dy = d 2 (B.8) gives where V T = σk 2π e 2ab T a = σ 2 2 ; b = 1 σ 2 ln K F exp[ a 2 y 2 b 2 /y 2 ]dy (B.9) Making use of he inegral from he Sec. B.2 we obain: F < K : F > K : V T = σk 2π e 2ab J + [ T] = 1 2 (F K +F Φ[k 1 ]+KΦ[k 2 ]) V T = σk 2π e 2ab J [ T] = 1 2 (K F +F Φ[k 1 ]+KΦ[k 2 ]) (B.1) (B.11) where Φ[x] is he Error funcion, and k 1 = σ 2 2 T ln K F σ 2T, k 2 = σ 2 2 T +ln K F σ 2T I is easy o show ha he ime value obained by his mehod coincides wih he Black-Scholes ime value: V T = CallOpionValue(F,K,T) max(f K,). Noe ha he Black-Scholes opion value is usually expressed in erms of he cumulaive normal disribuion funcion N[x], which is relaed o he Error funcion as N[x] = 1 ( ] x ) 1+Φ[. 2 2 B.2 Inegral evaluaion We have an indefinie inegral I and definie version of i J: T I = e a2 x 2 b 2 /x 2 dx, J[T] = e a2 x 2 b 2 /x 2 dx (B.12) 2

21 We are searching he soluion for (B.9) in he form of Error funcion: Φ(x) = 2 x e 2 d, Φ(± ) = ±1. (B.13) π Noicing ha d dx Φ(ax+b/x) = 2 ( e 2ab a b ) π x 2 d dx Φ(ax b/x) = 2 ( e 2ab a+ b ) π x 2 we find d dx e a2 x 2 b 2 /x 2 e a2 x 2 b 2 /x 2 [ e 4ab Φ(ax+b/x)+Φ(ax b/x) ] = 4a π e 2ab e a2 x 2 b 2 /x 2 (B.14) (B.15) (B.16) Thus we obain I = C + π 4a Using he limi for T ( ) e 2ab Φ(ax+b/x)+e 2ab Φ(ax b/x) ; (B.17) b > : b < : we find he definie inegral: π b > : J + [T] = 4a π b < : J [T] = 4a lim Φ(aT +b/t) = 1, lim T + lim Φ(aT +b/t) = 1, lim T + Φ(aT b/t) = 1 (B.18) T + Φ(aT b/t) = 1 (B.19) T + ( ) e 2ab e 2ab +e 2ab Φ(aT +b/t)+e 2ab Φ(aT b/t) ( ) e 2ab e 2ab +e 2ab Φ(aT +b/t)+e 2ab Φ(aT b/t) (B.2) (B.21) C Cumulaive cash flow Here we show how he ime value of a sorage opion can be obained from he cumulaive cash flow of rolling inrinsic hedge rades. Using Eq. (7.3) we find he oal cumulaive cash flow as P(T e ) = dt T (F (T)+δF (T))δh (T) (C.1) where h (T) = q in (,T). The inner inegral is over he observaion ime. I gives a cumulaive cash flow for he fixed delivery ime T. Now we use inegraion by pars, which in our case reads T (F h) T = = hδf + T F δh+ T δf δh (C.2) where he inegraion and limis are wih respec o he ime. Averaging he laer expression and noicing ha δf = we obain F T h T F h = T F δh + T The averaged cumulaive cash flow becomes P(T e ) = F (T)h (T)dT δf δh F T (T)h T (T) dt (C.3) 21

22 Noicing ha q in (,T)F(,T)dT equals he opion inrinsic value, and Te q in (T,T)F(T,T)dT equals he rue opion value 4, we conclude ha V T = P(T e ) = dp. (C.4) References [1] Lesnik, D. Inrinsic Sorage Valuaion by Variaional Analysis. arxiv: , We make use of he fac ha he inrinsic exercise q in (T,T) is opimal sochasic exercise. 22