EBF comments 1 on the supervisory benchmarking concept established in article 78 of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV)
|
|
- Phebe Young
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EBF ref / Brussels, 30 January 2014 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries. The EBF represents the interests of some 4,500 banks, large and small, wholesale and retail, local and cross-border financial institutions. Together, these banks account for over 80% of the total assets and deposits and some 80% of all bank loans in the EU alone. EBF comments 1 on the supervisory benchmarking concept established in article 78 of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) BACKGROUND The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV), in its article 78, requires competent authorities to conduct, at least annually, a supervisory benchmarking assessment of internal approaches for the calculation of own funds requirements except for operational risk. Such an assessment shall show significant differences in own funds requirements for the same exposure as well as internal approaches showing extreme diversity or signs of systematic underestimation of own funds requirements. EBA is mandated to develop guidelines and regulatory technical standards (RTS) for the assessment and procedures involved including the template, the definitions and the benchmark portfolios. For this purpose, EBA organised a workshop with representatives of competent authorities and banks on 19 December The EBF has actively participated in the review of the characteristics of internal approaches from It has contributed to the review with the publication of a thorough study of the characteristics of internal rating based models for residential mortgages 2 conducted by the EBF with the involvement of 43 banks from 14 EU countries. Several meetings have been held with the EBA including at the abovementioned workshop as well as with investors and other stakeholders. There is broad common understanding that differences in the outcome of internal approaches stem from three main sources: Firstly, market characteristics and legal framework; secondly, supervisory practices; and thirdly, banks choices within the options available in the international standards established by the Basel Committee and transposed to the EU in the former CRD. 1 Prepared by the EBF Risk Assessment Working Group and approved by the EBF Banking Supervision Committee. Contact person at the EBF Secretariat: Gonzalo Gasos (g.gasos@ebf-fbe.eu). 2 EBF Study on IRB models for residential mortgages in Europe (July 2012). EBF a.i.s.b.l ETI Registration number: , Avenue des Arts B-1000 Brussels +32 (0) Phone +32 (0) Fax
2 Against this background, the EBF would like to convey the following messages to the EBA for the preparation of the RTS. GENERAL REMARKS The concept of benchmarking or comparing the output of one model against another could be meaningless unless the objectives of the two models are similar. We know (e.g. from the Third interim report on the consistency of risk-weighted assets, EBA, 17 December 2013) that any two models can differ significantly in respect of their (i) model philosophy (through-the-cycle, hybrid, point-in-time); and (ii) the length of the data series used to calibrate the models. Constructing benchmarks using aggregates of models which differ on these two points, or using a fixed benchmark, cannot account for these differences. At issue here is the lack of regulatory consistency across jurisdictions, and within jurisdictions, on what a PD model output must represent. For example, rules could be set to determine model philosophy; rules could be set to ensure that model calibrations represent a full economic cycle view of the risk. In order to successfully and meaningfully benchmark models in a perfect world, this lack of consistency must be remediated, time given for banks to adapt their models and then sensible and meaningful benchmarks could be constructed. This would be unlikely to be compatible with the timeframes envisaged to complete the benchmarking exercise and report ultimately to the European Commission. Given that models must and should reflect banks own experiences, their processes, risk policies and risk management performance, benchmarks should provide a range of acceptable outputs. This should preserve the objective of risk sensitivity of the previous Basel accord, and also remind supervisors and other stakeholders, that benchmarking is no substitute for the internal back testing and validation of models, which still must be regarded as the key factors in assessing model performance. An additional concern is that banks construct models that operate statistically. Acceptable models, therefore, are models that operate effectively on the bulk of that individual bank s borrowers. Errors will be tolerated for outlier borrowers. Benchmarking approaches that do not take account of this run the risk of rejecting model outputs based upon the inadvertent selection of an outlier population for the comparison. It is possible and perfectly acceptable for two banks to rate the same borrower completely differently using two powerful and correctly calibrated statistical models. The clustering approach may serve to mitigate this concern to some degree. The EBF s members have a common interest with the EBA in seeking to provide confidence in banks risk-weighting approaches. Notwithstanding the besetting difficulties described, the EBF welcomes the intent of the benchmarking concept and intends to examine the benchmarking problem with a view to present a workable solution to the EBA in the not too distant future. 2
3 KEY POINTS Type of benchmark We note that the EBA has identified two possible types of benchmarks, namely a relative benchmark or an absolute benchmark. Regarding the option of absolute benchmarks, we note that the EBA points to 2 possible benchmarks for capital requirements, i.e. the standardised approach and the mapping to rating agency default rates (for the PD) and Foundation regulatory values for the LGD and the EAD. The EBA should refrain from using a blunt standardised measure as a benchmark as it could unwarrantedly replace the true observation of risk. In the view of the EBF, it would be preferable to use relative benchmarks subject to certain conditions for the following reasons: It would be a more natural way of benchmarking, as recognized in the EBA paper, however some caveats have to be considered (see the section on clusters below). It allows certain degree of flexibility to explain the reasons of the observed variability for the sake of understanding. More importantly, a relative benchmark can give recognition to other qualitative aspects associated with risk models such as risk policies and risk management practices. These are the conditions that the use of relative benchmarks should meet: It should be broken down in several dimensions. No straight comparison should be made but a fair appraisal should seek a minimum degree of homogeneity in the populations subject to evaluation. Parameters should be consistent across banks. We understand how difficult it is to compare the results of models that contain significant methodological differences. For this reason the EBA should communicate that the results of relative benchmarking carry the bias associated with the different options available to banks modelling. So long as convergence is apparent the relative benchmark will become more meaningful. The exercise should always be based on actual parameters and exposures. Qualitative explanations of the relevant factors that may have an impact on the variability of risk weights should be studied and published together with the results. Clusters It is worth mentioning that the comparison made in a benchmarking exercised is focused on the model. Therefore the definition of the model matters. One of the key characteristics of a model is about the number and nature of the clusters in which borrowers are classified. The estimated parameters and the observed default frequency (ODF) refers to every cluster. This makes it 3
4 difficult to draw fair conclusions from a comparison between average regulatory PDs and default rates at a cluster level. We find two main sources of problem. From a practical viewpoint, banks typically calculate the ODF at model level, with the clients or contracts that meet the features to belong to that model as defined in every bank. The problem is that the EBA would use its own definition of clusters that will not match those of banks. In fact, banks may not have historical records available with the features that define a specific cluster designed by EBA. EBA will have to take into account this limitation in the calculation and in the communication of results. From a conceptual standpoint, if banks had the possibility to calculate the ODF at every defined cluster level with and EAD-averaged regulatory PD, the conclusions drawn from a simple comparison could still be questionable. For instance, the exposures of an EBA cluster could belong to two different internal models of a bank, as shown in this picture: MODEL 1 MODEL 2 CLUSTER 1 It follows that back-testing needs to be interpreted. The potential determination of homogeneous clusters at European level lies behind. In the meantime, the EBA should take this limitation into account for instance by accepting in each cluster only PD reported values with low dispersion. These facts should be made known when laying out the conclusions of the assessment. Floors The question was raised whether relative benchmarks should apply before or after the impact of floors and other model limits. The EBA rightfully indicates in its preliminary examination that the purer capital requirement pre-adjustment would be more complicated to implement due to the fact that the supervisory floor requirements are in many cases embedded into the banks rating systems and calculation processes. The EBF agrees with the EBA analysis but would like to underscore how important it is to allow for a qualitative interpretation of the post-adjustment results. The most significant differences in the national application of floors should be roughly estimated and explained to duly complement the findings of the hard comparison. 4
5 Hypothetical transactions The EBF has long warned about the fundamental confusion behind the use of hypothetical transactions. There seems to be a widespread belief that the same transaction should be assigned exactly the same risk weight in every bank. Evidence suggests that the general public oftentimes jump to the conclusion that there is something wrong in the models. For this reason, we urge regulators to be extremely cautious with the publication of such outcomes. In particular, the EBF does not favour the use of hypothetical transactions for several reasons: They are less meaningful than actual transactions of real borrowers. Models work on a statistical basis. Hence the accuracy of a model should only be measured against the whole target population but no conclusion should be drawn from a single item. Hypothetical transactions do not take into account relevant factors involved in the risk experience of the institution such as its processes, risk policies and risk management performance. The recurrent use of hypothetical transactions would entail a certain bias as models will look better the closer they are to the proposed transactions. Models could end up accommodating to a set of hypothetical transactions instead of focusing on its performance on the actual transactions. Timescales The benchmarking exercises will be put in place when the definition of the underlying regulatory criteria is still underway. This is particularly the case as regards divergent modelling options and supervisory practices in the field of risk models. Concerning the implementation of benchmarking of market risk models in accordance with article 78, we urge the EBA to take into consideration the fundamental review of the trading book that will be taking place simultaneously. The fundamental review of the trading book will entail considerable work for banks on impact studies and model development and will most likely result in changes of the current internal market risk models or implementation of new ones. For this reason we question the merit in introducing a very detailed benchmarking exercise of existing market risk models at this stage. Data collection In order to ensure a consistent data collection over time for the benchmarking exercise we recommend the EBA to apply a systematic approach to data collection and the use of information already provided in the existing reporting frameworks (COREP and FINREP) to the furthest possible extent. Ad hoc data collection draws heavily on banks resources and enhances the risk of inconsistency in data from different banks and over time. 5
6 Communication The EBA already showed a cautious approach when editing former papers on risk weighted methodologies and risk analyses and we would expect that it follows the same line in this occasion as the correct interpretation of risk weight benchmarking involves considerable degree of understanding of the fundamentals of risk measurement. In this vein, the EBA should be very careful in the communication of results to ensure a correct interpretation. A private communication to individual banks should be sought. In the case that a future public disclosure is made, the relevant circumstances affecting the outcome of models should be reflected in the report so that banks could give an educated explanation to analysts and stakeholders. These circumstances should include market characteristics, legal framework aspects and significant modelling options. It will also be important to lay out the results in terms of acceptable ranges of variation. Straight comparisons could mislead the general public. Instead, we should speak in terms of Acceptable ranges of variation given the circumstances of the institution. 6
D1387D-2012 Brussels, 24 August 2012
D1387D-2012 Brussels, 24 August 2012 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries.
More informationEBF COMMENTS ON THE EBA CONSULTATION PAPER ON DRAFT IMPLEMENTING TECHNICAL STANDARDS ON DISCLOSURE FOR OWN FUNDS BY INSTITUTIONS
EBF Ref.: D1335F-2012 Brussels, 31 July 2012 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The
More informationEBF response to the EBA consultation on prudent valuation
D2380F-2012 Brussels, 11 January 2013 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The EBF represents
More informationEBA REPORT RESULTS FROM THE 2016 HIGH DEFAULT PORTFOLIOS (HDP) EXERCISE. 03 March 2017
EBA REPORT RESULTS FROM THE 2016 HIGH DEFAULT PORTFOLIOS (HDP) EXERCISE 03 March 2017 Contents List of figures 3 Abbreviations 6 1. Executive summary 7 2. Introduction and legal background 10 3. Dataset
More informationEBF Response to the EBA Consultations on currencies with constrained availability of Liquid Assets
EBF_005646 Brussels, 13 December 2013 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries.
More informationEBA REPORT RESULTS FROM THE 2017 LOW DEFAULT PORTFOLIOS (LDP) EXERCISE. 14 November 2017
EBA REPORT RESULTS FROM THE 2017 LOW DEFAULT PORTFOLIOS (LDP) EXERCISE 14 November 2017 Contents EBA report 1 List of figures 3 Abbreviations 5 1. Executive summary 7 2. Introduction and legal background
More informationShort selling EBF Response to CESR Consultation Paper on a Proposal for a Pan-European Short Selling Disclosure Regime Key Points:
EBF Ref.: D1291D Brussels, 30 September 2009 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The
More informationEBF Response to BCBS Consultative Document (CD) on Interest rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB)
EBF_016518 8 th September 2015 EBF Response to BCBS Consultative Document (CD) on Interest rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) The European Banking Federation (EBF) is the voice of the European banking
More information26 June 2014 EBA/CP/2014/10. Consultation Paper
26 June 2014 EBA/CP/2014/10 Consultation Paper Draft regulatory technical standards on the sequential implementation of the IRB Approach and permanent partial use under the Standardised Approach under
More informationEBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA/Draft/RTS/2012/01 26 September 2012 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Capital Requirements for Central Counterparties under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical
More informationDRAFT REGULATORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS ON MATERIALITY THRESHOLD OF CREDIT OBLIGATION PAST DUE UNDER ARTICLE 178 OF REGULATION (EU) 575/2013
Spanish Banking Association 28 th January 2015 DRAFT REGULATORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS ON MATERIALITY THRESHOLD OF CREDIT OBLIGATION PAST DUE UNDER ARTICLE 178 OF REGULATION (EU) 575/2013 The AEB is grateful
More informationEBF preliminary views on the IASB ED IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement
EBF ref. D1386E Brussels, 27 August 2009 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries). The EBF
More informationJoint Response to EBA consultation Paper (CP 51) Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting Requirements for large Exposures
D0425F-2012 26 March 2012 Joint Response to EBA consultation Paper (CP 51) Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting Requirements for large Exposures Key Points The first time adoption of the ITS should be, at
More informationGuidelines. on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures EBA/GL/2017/16 20/11/2017
EBA/GL/2017/16 20/11/2017 Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures 1 Contents 1. Executive summary 3 2. Background and rationale 5 3. Guidelines on PD estimation,
More informationEBF position on the inclusion of financial services in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations
Chief Executive KK Ref.: EBF_002430 Brussels, 7 June 2013 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation (EBF) is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association
More informationEBF comments on ESMA guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements
EV EBF Ref.: D0223D-2012 Brussels, 24 February 2012 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association
More informationEBF response to the EBA consultation on securitisation retention (EBA/CP/2013/14)
EBF ref. 003870 Brussels, 22 August 2013 Set up in 1960, the European Banking Federation (EBF) is the voice of the European banking sector (European Union & European Free Trade Association countries).
More informationConsultation Paper. On Guidelines for the estimation of LGD appropriate for an economic downturn ( Downturn LGD estimation ) EBA/CP/2018/08
EBA/CP/2018/08 22 May 2018 Consultation Paper On Guidelines for the estimation of LGD appropriate for an economic downturn ( Downturn LGD estimation ) Contents 1. Responding to this consultation 3 2. Executive
More informationEBF response to IOSCO consultation on protection of client assets Key Points
EBF a.i.s.b.l ETI Registration number: 4722660838-23 Avenue des Arts 56, B-1000 Brussels +32 (0)2 508 37 11 Phone +32 (0)2 511 23 28 Fax www.ebf-fbe.eu EBF Ref.: D2654D-2013 Brussels, 25 March 2013 Launched
More informationInterim results update of the EBA review of the consistency of risk-weighted assets
EBA Report 05 August 2013 Interim results update of the EBA review of the consistency of risk-weighted assets - Low default portfolio analysis External report Interim results update (LDP) Table of contents
More informationBCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions
12 January 2017 EBF_024875 BCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions Key points: The regulatory framework must ensure that the same potential losses are not covered both by capital
More informationEBF Response to EBA Consultation on draft ITS amending ITS on supervisory reporting on Liquidity Coverage Ratio (EBA/CP/2014/45)
EBF_0125713v5 The European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector, uniting 32 national banking associations in Europe that together represent some 4,500 banks - large and small,
More informationEBF Response to EBA Consultation Paper "Draft Guidelines on methods for calculating contributions to Deposit Guarantee Schemes" EBA/CP/2014/35
EBF_012950v5 The European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector, uniting 32 national banking associations in Europe that together represent some 4,500 banks - large and small,
More informationConsultation Paper. Draft Guidelines EBA/CP/2018/03 17/04/2018
CONSULTATION PAPER ON SPECIFICATION OF TYPES OF EXPOSURES TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH EBA/CP/2018/03 17/04/2018 Consultation Paper Draft Guidelines on specification of types of exposures to be associated
More informationEBA REPORT ON RESULTS FROM THE SECOND EBA IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF IFRS July 2017
EBA REPORT ON RESULTS FROM THE SECOND EBA IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF IFRS 9 13 July 2017 Contents Executive summary 3 Content of the report 3 1. Main observations of the impact assessment exercise 4 1.1 Qualitative
More informationSubject: The EBA s views on the adoption of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)
THE CHAIRPERSON Roger Marshall, EFRAG Board Acting President European Financial Reporting Advisory Group EFRAG 35 Square de Meeûs B-1000 Brussels EBA/2015/D/138 26 June 2015 Subject: The EBA s views on
More informationGuidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
EBA/GL/2017/16 23/04/2018 Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures 1 Compliance and reporting obligations Status of these guidelines 1. This document contains
More informationEBA REPORT FIRST OBSERVATIONS ON THE IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF IFRS 9 BY EU INSTITUTIONS. 20 December 2018
EBA REPORT FIRST OBSERVATIONS ON THE IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF IFRS 9 BY EU INSTITUTIONS 20 December 2018 Contents List of figures and tables 2 Executive summary 4 Content of the report 4 Main observations
More informationGuidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures European Banking Authority (EBA) www.managementsolutions.com Research and Development December Página 2017 1 List of
More informationESBG common response to the European Commission consultation on the Liikanen Report recommendations.
ESBG common response to the European Commission consultation on the Liikanen Report recommendations. WSBI-ESBG (World Institute of Savings Banks - European Savings Banks Group) Rue Marie-Thérèse, 11 -
More informationCP ON DRAFT RTS ON ASSSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR IRB APPROACH EBA/CP/2014/ November Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2014/36 12 November 2014 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards On the specification of the assessment methodology for competent authorities regarding compliance of an institution
More informationSantander response to the European Commission s Public Consultation on Credit Rating Agencies
Santander response to the European Commission s Public Consultation on Credit Rating Agencies General comments Santander welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Consultation on Credit Rating Agencies
More informationBasel II: Application requirements for New Zealand banks seeking accreditation to implement the Basel II internal models approaches from January 2008
Basel II: Application requirements for New Zealand banks seeking accreditation to implement the Basel II internal models approaches from January 2008 Reserve Bank of New Zealand March 2006 2 OVERVIEW A
More informationBenchmarking exercises. Webinar 12 May 2016
Benchmarking exercises Webinar 12 May 2016 Benchmarking exercises - process ITS on benchmarking portfolios and reporting 1. EBA defines benchmarking portfolios and reporting obligation 2. Banks calculate
More informationEBA/CP/2018/ May Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2018/07 22 May 2018 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with Articles 181(3)(a)
More informationCONSULTATION PAPER ON DRAFT RTS ON TREATMENT OF CLEARING MEMBERS' EXPOSURES TO CLIENTS EBA/CP/2014/ February Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2014/01 28 February 2014 Consultation Paper Draft regulatory technical standards on the margin periods for risk used for the treatment of clearing members' exposures to clients under Article 304(5)
More informationCall for advice to the EBA for the purposes of revising the own fund requirements for credit, operational, market and credit valuation adjustment risk
Ref. Ares(2018)2374104-04/05/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union Call for advice to the EBA for the purposes of revising the
More informationLeaseurope & Eurofinas response to the EBA consultation paper on PD estimation, LGD estimation and treatment of defaulted assets
Brussels, 10 February 2017 Leaseurope & Eurofinas response to the EBA consultation paper on PD estimation, LGD estimation and treatment of defaulted assets Eurofinas and Leaseurope, the voices of consumer
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process)
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process) Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord Issued for comment by 31 May 2001 January 2001 Table
More informationFINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINES ON UNIFORM DISCLOSURE OF IFRS 9 TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS EBA/GL/2018/01 12/01/2018. Final report
EBA/GL/2018/01 12/01/2018 Final report Guidelines on uniform disclosures under Article 473a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the transitional period for mitigating the impact of the introduction
More informationFrench Banking Federation response to EBA consultation paper on guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) 575/2013.
29. 09.2016 French Banking Federation response to EBA consultation paper on guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) 575/2013. The French Banking Federation (FBF) represents
More informationConsultation Paper CP/EBA/2017/ March 2017
CP/EBA/2017/02 01 March 2017 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with Articles 181(3)(a)
More informationEBA final draft implementing technical standards
EBA ITS 2017 02 4 May 2017 EBA final draft implementing technical standards Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to benchmarking
More informationEBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
FINAL DRAFT RTS ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION RELATED TO THE COUNTERCYCLICAL BUFFER EBA/RTS/2014/17 23 December 2014 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards on disclosure of information in relation
More informationInteraction between the prudential and accounting framework - Expected losses
EBF_021542 30 th June 2016 Interaction between the prudential and accounting framework - Expected losses Key messages The prudential framework has been strengthened since the beginning of the financial
More informationCONSULTATION PAPER ON ITS AMENDING THE BENCHMARKING REGULATION EBA/CP/2017/ December Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2017/23 18 December 2017 Consultation Paper Draft Implementing Technical Standards amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 with regard to benchmarking of internal models Contents
More informationSubject: Proposed Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive
EBF_021164 20 May 2016 Commissioner Pierre MOSCOVICI Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs European Commission Email: cab-moscovici-webpage@ec.europa.eu Dear Commissioner, Subject: Proposed
More informationAnnex I - SUPERVISORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LIQUIDITY COVERAGE AND STABLE FUNDING RATIO
20 December 2012 Annex I - SUPERVISORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LIQUIDITY COVERAGE AND STABLE FUNDING RATIO Feedback on the public consultation and on the opinion of the BSG On 7 June 2012, the EBA publicly
More informationEBA/CP/2013/ Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2013/07 17.05.2013 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards On the determination of the overall exposure to a client or a group of connected clients in respect of transactions with
More informationEBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA/RTS/2014/10 4 July 2014 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the conditions for assessing the materiality of extensions and changes of internal approaches when calculating own funds requirements
More informationGlobal Credit Data SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT GCD CONTACT GCD. 15 November 2017
Global Credit Data by banks for banks Downturn LGD Study 2017 European Large Corporates / Commercial Real Estate and Global Banks and Financial Institutions TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 COMPOSITION
More informationEBA /RTS/2018/04 16 November Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA /RTS/2018/04 16 November 2018 Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with Articles 181(3)(a) and
More informationEBA FINAL draft Implementing Technical Standards
EBA/ITS/2013/03 21/10/2013 EBA FINAL draft Implementing Technical Standards On Supervisory reporting on forbearance and non-performing exposures under article 99(4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 EBA FINAL
More information19 June 2015 EBA Consultation Paper on Limits on exposures to shadow banking
EBF_014865E The European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector, uniting 32 national banking associations in Europe that together represent some 4,500 banks - large and small, wholesale
More informationRisk-modelling techniques: analysis and application for supervisory purposes 1
Risk-modelling techniques: analysis and application for supervisory purposes 1 The BE has for many years set great store in its continuous supervision of institutions by the verification and evaluation
More informationBasel 4: The way ahead
Basel 4: The way ahead Credit Risk - IRB approach Closing in on consistency? April 2018 kpmg.com/basel4 The way ahead 2 Contents 01 Introduction 1 / Introduction 2 2 / Impact on banks capital ratios 3
More informationThe Belgian Mortgage Market: Recent Developments and Prudential Measures
Thomas Schepens Nationale Bank van Belgiё 1 Introduction The presentation at the workshop was based on two articles that appeared in the Financial Stability Review 2014 of the Nationale Bank van Belgiё
More informationConsultation on Supervisory reporting requirements for leverage ratio (EBA/CP/2012/06)
Consultation on Supervisory reporting requirements for leverage ratio (EBA/CP/2012/06) BNPP general comments We welcome the opportunity to comment the consultation paper on draft ITS on supervisory reporting
More informationBCBS Developments in Credit Risk Regulation
BCBS Developments in Credit Risk Regulation Hanne Meihuizen Quantitative Risk Management Expert Supervision Policy Department De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) June 2015 The views expressed in the following
More informationBasel II: Requirements for European Integration Kangaroo Group Brussels, 6 October 2004
Basel II: Requirements for European Integration Kangaroo Group Brussels, 6 October 2004 José María Roldán Chair of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS), Member of the Basel Committee on
More information8 October 2007 ASSESSMENT OF CONVERGENCE IN SUPERVISORY REPORTING
8 October 2007 ASSESSMENT OF CONVERGENCE IN SUPERVISORY REPORTING Executive summary The aim of the present study is to provide a first assessment of the level of convergence in the reporting practices
More informationEBA consultation paper on draft ITS on supervisory reporting requirements for institutions
1 (18) To the European Banking Authority Reference: ITS (CP50) EBA consultation paper on draft ITS on supervisory reporting requirements for institutions The EBA has published a consultation paper on draft
More informationEBF Comment Letter on the IASB Exposure Draft - Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses
Chief Executive DM/MT Ref.:EBF_001692 Mr Hans HOOGERVORST Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Email: hhoogervorst@ifrs.org Brussels, 5 July
More informationGUIDELINES ON SIGNIFICANT RISK TRANSFER FOR SECURITISATION EBA/GL/2014/05. 7 July Guidelines
EBA/GL/2014/05 7 July 2014 Guidelines on Significant Credit Risk Transfer relating to Articles 243 and Article 244 of Regulation 575/2013 Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 Scope and content of the Guidelines
More informationFEEDBACK TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE FRAMEWORK FOR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORTING (CP06)
December 2005 FEEDBACK TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE FRAMEWORK FOR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORTING (CP06) 1. CEBS published its sixth consultation paper, on the framework for consolidated financial reporting
More informationConsultation response
Consultation response EBA Draft RTS on Assigning Risk Weights to Specialised Lending Exposures 11 August 2015 The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) welcomes the opportunity to provide
More informationInterim results of the EBA review of the consistency of risk-weighted assets. Top-down assessment of the banking book.
Interim results of the EBA review of the consistency of risk-weighted assets. Top-down assessment of the banking book 26 February 2013 Interim results of the EBA review of the consistency of risk-weighted
More informationEFAMA Response to ESMA s Consultation Paper on Guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the AIFMD
EFAMA Response to ESMA s Consultation Paper on Guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the AIFMD EFAMA 1 appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the ESMA Consultation paper on Guidelines
More informationStrengthening bank capital Basel III and beyond
Strengthening bank capital Basel III and beyond Stefan Ingves Chairman, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and Governor, Sveriges Riksbank Keynote address to the Ninth High Level Meeting for the Middle
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 23.10.2013 SWD(2013) 426 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Council Directive amending
More informationConsultation response Consultation on Guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) 575/2013
Consultation response Consultation on Guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 29 September 2016 The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) welcomes
More informationESBG response to the EBA consultation on SMEs and the SME Supporting Factor
ESBG response to the EBA consultation on SMEs and the SME Supporting Factor ESBG (European Savings and Retail Banking Group) Rue Marie-Thérèse, 11 - B-1000 Brussels ESBG Transparency Register ID 8765978796-80
More informationEBF response to the European Commission consultation on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector
Ref.:002734 Brussels, 10 July 2013 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries. The
More informationBasel II Implementation Update
Basel II Implementation Update World Bank/IMF/Federal Reserve System Seminar for Senior Bank Supervisors from Emerging Economies 15-26 October 2007 Elizabeth Roberts Director, Financial Stability Institute
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel III Monitoring Report December 2017 Results of the cumulative quantitative impact study Queries regarding this document should be addressed to the Secretariat
More informationImpacts and concerns about IFRS9 implementation
Impacts and concerns about IFRS9 implementation Keynote speech by Mr Pedro Duarte Neves, Vice-Governor of the Banco de Portugal, at the meeting on Accounting for Derivatives and Financial Instruments organized
More informationNATIONAL BANK OF ROMANIA
NATIONAL BANK OF ROMANIA REGULATION No.26 from 15.12.2009 on the implementation, validation and assessment of Internal Ratings Based Approaches for credit institutions Having regard to the provisions of
More informationThe New Basel Accord Banks current state of readiness A European perspective
The New Basel Accord Banks current state of readiness A European perspective 14 May 2002 Istanbul Charles Ilako Partner, Head of EMEA Regulatory Practice (Europe) Issues Considered Overall context Basel
More informationRevised Guidelines on the recognition of External Credit Assessment Institutions
30 November 2010 Revised Guidelines on the recognition of External Credit Assessment Institutions Executive Summary 1. The Capital Requirements Directive 1 (CRD) allows institutions to use external credit
More informationSummary of RBNZ response to submissions on the draft capital adequacy framework (internal models based approach)(bs2b)
Summary of RBNZ response to submissions on the draft capital adequacy framework (internal models based approach)(bs2b) In September 2007 the Reserve Bank of New Zealand released the draft document: Capital
More informationFRAMEWORK FOR SUPERVISORY INFORMATION
FRAMEWORK FOR SUPERVISORY INFORMATION ABOUT THE DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES OF BANKS AND SECURITIES FIRMS (Joint report issued in conjunction with the Technical Committee of IOSCO) (May 1995) I. Introduction
More informationNSFR EBA REPLY TO THE CALL FOR ADVICE (CORE FUNDING RATIO: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS IN THE EU) EBA-Op September 2016
NSFR EBA REPLY TO THE CALL FOR ADVICE (CORE FUNDING RATIO: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS IN THE EU) EBA-Op-2016-15 05 September 2016 1 Contents List of tables 3 List of figures 4 Background 5 Economic and supervisory
More informationEuropean Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
European Banking Authority Tower 42 (level 18) 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ, United Kingdom EBA-CP-2013-06@eba.europa.eu Brussels, 24 June 2013 VH/LD/B2/13-060 EBA Consultation on Draft ITS on Supervisory
More informationIFRS 9: A new model for expected loss provisions for credit risk
IFRS 9: A new model for expected loss provisions for credit risk Pilar Barrios and Paula Papp 1 The entry into force of IFRS 9 next year marks a fundamental change in the provisioning paradigm for financial
More informationEBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA/RTS/2017/07 21 June 2017 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards for determining proxy spread and limited smaller portfolios for credit valuation adjustment under Article 383(7) of Regulation
More informationRegulatory treatment of accounting provisions
BBA response to the Basel Committee s proposal for the Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions January 2017 Introduction The British Banker s Association (BBA) is pleased to respond to the Basel
More informationEBF response to EBA consultation on homogeneity of underlying assets
15/03/2018 EBF response to EBA consultation on homogeneity of underlying assets Key points: Well established securitisations considered as high-quality under current market practices must be preserved
More informationConsultation on EBA-CP Supervisory reporting requirements for liquidity coverage and stable funding.
Consultation on EBA-CP-2012-05 - Supervisory reporting requirements for liquidity coverage and stable funding. Replies and comments by the EBA Banking Stakeholder Group Question 1: Are the proposed dates
More informationChristian Noyer: Basel II new challenges
Christian Noyer: Basel II new challenges Speech by Mr Christian Noyer, Governor of the Bank of France, before the Bank of Algeria and the Algerian financial community, Algiers, 16 December 2007. * * *
More informationEBA s role in promoting supervisory and regulatory convergence in the EU. Andrea Enria - EBA Chairman Helsinki 5 June rd FIN-FSA Conference
EBA s role in promoting supervisory and regulatory convergence in the EU Andrea Enria - EBA Chairman Helsinki 5 June 2014 3rd FIN-FSA Conference Outline Progress in the repair of the EU banking sector
More informationA response to the Prudential Regulation Authority s Consultation Paper CP29/16. Residential mortgage risk weights. October 2016
Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA 31 October 2016 A response to the Prudential Regulation Authority s Consultation Paper CP29/16 Introduction Residential mortgage risk weights
More informationEBF POSITION ON THE REVIEW OF THE MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE
EBF Ref.D2000D-2011 Brussels, 19 December 2011 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 Disclosures Year ended 31 December 2009
DBS Group Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries (the Group) have adopted Basel II as set out in the revised Monetary Authority of Singapore Notice to Banks No. 637 (Notice on Risk Based Capital Adequacy Requirements
More informationEUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF CO-OPERATIVE BANKS The Co-operative difference : Sustainability, Proximity, Governance. EACB Comments
EACB Comments BCBS Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions Discussion Paper and Interim approach and transitional arrangements (BCBS 385 and 386) Brussels, 13 th January 2017 The voice of 4.050 local
More information24 June Dear Sir/Madam
24 June 2016 Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland baselcommittee@bis.org Doc Ref: #183060v2 Your ref: Direct : +27 11
More informationNew Capital-Adequacy Rules for Credit Institutions
23 New Capital-Adequacy Rules for Credit Institutions Lisbeth Borup and Morten Lykke, Financial Markets INTRODUCTION The Basel Committee is close to agreeing on the final content of the revised capital
More informationRESERVE BANK OF MALAWI
RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI GUIDELINES ON INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP) Bank Supervision Department March 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 MANDATE... 2 3.0 RATIONALE...
More informationBasel II: New Zealand discretions for the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk
Basel II: New Zealand discretions for the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk Reserve Bank of New Zealand Exposure Draft March 2006 2 The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has developed
More informationBASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE
2012 BASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2012 APS 330: CAPITAL ADEQUACY & RISK MANAGEMENT IN ANZ Important notice This document has been prepared by Australia and New Zealand Banking
More informationFinal Report. Draft Implementing Standards. amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 with regard to prudent valuation EBA/ITS/2018/01
EBA/ITS/2018/01 17/04/2018 Final Report Draft Implementing Standards amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 with regard to prudent valuation Contents Executive Summary 3 Background and rationale
More information