Financial instruments: FASB standard on recognition and measurement
|
|
- Eleanore Allen
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Financial instruments: FASB standard on recognition and measurement Prepared by: Faye Miller, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP Updated April 2018 Overview On January 5, 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) , Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic ): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, its long-awaited final standard on the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. ASU applies to all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities and was subsequently clarified with the recent issuance of ASU , Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic ): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The discussion that follows summarizes the significant changes ASU (as clarified by ASU ) brought about to existing guidance, outlines the effective date and transition provisions and discusses how to plan ahead for implementation. It concludes with a discussion on convergence and a chart that provides a comparison of current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to ASU and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9, Financial Instruments. While ASU is not first effective until 2018 for calendar year public business entities (PBEs), certain provisions can be adopted early. Middle market insights We believe the most far-reaching ramification of ASU is the elimination of the available-for-sale (AFS) classification for equity securities and the requirement to carry most equity securities at fair value through net income. This will likely result in significant income statement volatility for middle market companies that hold equity securities. Summary of significant changes The following areas were affected by ASU , and will be explained in the discussion that follows: Measurement of equity securities Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets associated with AFS debt securities Recognition of changes in fair value of liabilities attributable to instrument-specific credit risk Financial instrument disclosure requirements
2 Measurement of equity securities ASU created Subtopic , Investments Equity Securities, of the FASB s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), which is applicable to all entities except those in industries that account for substantially all investments at fair value through earnings or the change in net assets, such as broker-dealers, investment companies and postretirement plans. Along with the creation of the new subtopic, ASU eliminates the existing equity securities guidance contained within ASC , Investments Debt and Equity Securities Overall, including the AFS classification and the guidance related to cost method investments in ASC , Investments Other Overall. As such, it is no longer permissible to carry equity securities at fair value through other comprehensive income (OCI) or to apply the cost method to those equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. Under this new subtopic, equity securities are generally required to be measured at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses reflected in net income. Understanding what constitutes an equity security that is subject to ASC Equity securities are defined to include: (a) preferred, common and other ownership interests in entities, including partnerships, joint ventures and limited liability companies and (b) rights to acquire or dispose of ownership interests in entities at fixed or determinable prices. It should be noted that investments in mutual funds or ownership interests in companies or partnerships are considered to be equity securities even if the assets of the investee consist solely of debt securities given that, as indicated in ASC , it is not appropriate to look through the form of the investment. The definition of equity securities excludes certain options, as well as convertible debt and preferred stock that, by its contractual terms, must be redeemed by the issuing entity or is redeemable at the investor s option. Additionally, certain equity securities are excluded from the scope of ASC , namely: Derivative instruments subject to ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Equity investments that result in consolidation of the investee or are accounted for in accordance with the equity method of accounting under ASC 323, Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures Broker-dealer ownership interests in exchanges as described in ASC , Financial Services Brokers and Dealers Other Assets and Deferred Costs Investments in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock that are accounted for in accordance with ASC In addition to the aforementioned exclusions, ASC puts forth a measurement alternative whereby entities can make an election on a security-by-security basis to account for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost, with adjustments for impairment and observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer reflected in earnings. In other words, such securities are adjusted to fair value when an observable price change occurs or impairment is identified. This measurement alternative is not available for securities that qualify for the net asset value practical expedient under ASC , nor can it be elected by the entities noted earlier that are excluded from the scope of ASC The election is to be made on a security-by-security basis and with one exception, any security for which the election is made is required to be accounted for in this manner until it no longer qualifies, which could be the case, for example, if its fair value becomes readily determinable or if the security becomes eligible for the aforementioned net asset value practical expedient. ASU permits an entity that elected to account for a security under the measurement alternative to subsequently change to a fair value method through an irrevocable election that would apply to that security and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer that the entity currently holds or purchases in the future. It should be noted that an equity security is deemed to have a readily determinable fair value if it meets any of the following conditions: Sales prices or bid-and-asked quotations are currently available on a securities exchange registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in the over-the-counter market (if publicly reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations systems or by OTC Markets Group Inc.). Restricted stock meets this definition if the restriction terminates within one year. The security is traded in a foreign market of a breadth and scope comparable to one of the U.S. markets referred to in the previous bullet point. 2
3 The security is an investment in a mutual fund or similar structure, and the fair value per share is determined and published and is the basis for current transactions. Any securities accounted for under this measurement alternative are required to be evaluated for impairment under a one-step impairment model whereby if a qualitative analysis indicates impairment exists, the fair value of the security will need to be estimated and any excess of carrying value over its fair value recognized in net income. Impairment indicators to consider include, but are not limited to, the following: A significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality or business prospects of the investee A significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic or technological environment of the investee A significant adverse change in the general market condition of either the geographical area or the industry in which the investee operates A bona fide offer to purchase, an offer by the investee to sell, or a completed auction process for the same or similar investment for an amount less than the carrying amount of that investment Factors that raise significant concerns about the investee s ability to continue as a going concern, such as negative cash flows from operations, working capital deficiencies, or noncompliance with statutory capital requirements or debt covenants The requirement to adjust the carrying amount for observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer necessitates considering relevant transactions that occurred on or before the balance sheet date that are known or can reasonably be known. An entity is not expected to conduct an exhaustive search, but rather make a reasonable effort to identify observable transactions. ASU does not elaborate on what may constitute a reasonable effort. ASU clarified that if the measurement alternative is elected for a forward contract or purchased option, the entire fair value of the forward contract or purchased option should be remeasured when observable transactions occur on the underlying securities. In evaluating whether a security issued by the same issuer is similar to an equity security held by the reporting entity, consideration should be given to the different rights and obligations of the securities, such as rights related to voting, distributions, liquidation preferences and conversion. If the security is deemed to be similar, any observable prices associated with it should be adjusted for the different rights and obligations in determining the adjusted carrying value of the security held by the reporting entity. ASU clarified that any adjustment made to a security that is accounted for under the measurement alternative as a consequence of an observable price change for a similar investment of the same issuer should be made to reflect the fair value of the security held by the entity as of the date that the observable transaction for a similar security took place. Middle market insights Careful consideration should be given to the advantages and disadvantages of the measurement alternative when a middle market company is deciding whether to elect it for a qualifying security. One significant advantage is that if the exception is elected, it will generally not be necessary to estimate a fair value for the security unless impairment is identified. Another potential advantage is the possibility for this method to result in less earnings volatility as all changes in fair value are recognized in earnings if the exception is not elected for a particular security, while only impairment and observable price changes are recognized in earnings if the exception is elected. Disadvantages include the fact that if impairment is recognized, it cannot be reversed unless an observable price change supports an upward adjustment to the carrying amount. Additionally, there are notable ongoing efforts necessary to apply the measurement alternative. Consider, for example, the need to put in place processes to: (a) reassess individual securities to determine if they continue to qualify for the exception, (b) put forth reasonable effort to identify observable price changes for the security or similar securities of the issuer (which entails an analysis to determine if other securities with observable transactions are similar, and if so, how the observable price should be adjusted for differences between the 3
4 securities), (c) determine if the transactions resulting in observable prices were orderly and (d) assess the security for impairment and if impaired, estimate the fair value. Keep in mind that while these efforts could be significant and require considerable use of judgment, the measurement alternative is designed and expected to be less burdensome than determining a fair value estimate in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, at the end of each reporting period. Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets associated with AFS debt securities To address divergence in practice, the assessment of the need for a valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset related to an AFS debt security should be made in combination with the entity s other deferred tax assets. This constitutes a change for those reporting entities who previously evaluated the need for a valuation allowance discretely for deferred tax assets associated with unrealized losses on these debt securities and concluded the deferred tax asset was realizable based on the intent and ability to hold the securities until maturity. Recognition of changes in fair value of liabilities attributable to instrument-specific credit risk For those liabilities that an entity elects to account for at fair value under ASC , Financial Instruments Overall, or as clarified by ASU , under ASC , Derivatives and Hedging Embedded Derivatives, changes in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk are no longer recorded in net income. Instead, such changes are recorded in OCI to prevent the counterintuitive result of entities reporting gains in net income as their own creditworthiness deteriorates. This change does not apply to derivative or other liabilities for which fair value accounting is a requirement rather than an option, nor does it apply to financial liabilities of a consolidated collateralized financing entity measured using the measurement alternative described beginning at ASC An entity is permitted to assume that the portion of the total change in fair value that exceeds the amount resulting from a change in a base market rate, such as a risk-free or benchmark interest rate (e.g., LIBOR), is the change in instrument-specific credit risk. Alternatively, an entity can quantify the effect of changes in instrument-specific credit risk using another method that it considers to be more faithfully representative. The method chosen should be disclosed and consistently applied. ASU clarified the application of this guidance to a foreign-currency-denominated financial liability for which the fair value option is elected. Namely, the amount of change in fair value that relates to the instrument-specific credit risk should first be measured in the currency of denomination. Then, both components of the change in the fair value of the liability should be remeasured into the functional currency of the reporting entity using end-ofperiod spot rates. At the time that a financial liability designated under the fair value option is derecognized, the cumulative amount of the gain or loss that resulted from changes in instrument-specific credit risk is recognized in net income. Available for early adoption While ASU has a deferred effective date, reporting entities may early adopt this particular provision. Financial instrument disclosure requirements New disclosure requirements contained within ASU are as follows: Disclosure of all financial assets and financial liabilities grouped by both measurement category (e.g., amortized cost, fair value through OCI, fair value through net income) and form of financial asset (e.g., loan, debt security) Disclosure of the carrying amount of equity securities for which the aforementioned measurement alternative is elected, as well as the amount of adjustments made to the carrying amount for observable price changes and impairment during the reporting period the quantitative disclosures should be supplemented with narrative discussing the information that the entity considered in reaching the carrying amounts and adjustments resulting from observable price changes 4
5 Disclosure of the net gains and losses recognized during the period on equity securities less those net gains or losses on securities sold during the period to arrive at the recognized net unrealized gains and losses on equity securities that are held on the reporting date As it relates to liabilities that are accounted for under the fair value option, disclosure of: (a) the change (during the reporting period and cumulatively) in the fair value that is attributable to changes in the instrument-specific credit risk, (b) narrative discussing how the gains and losses attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk were determined and (c) if a liability accounted for under the fair value option is settled during the period, any amount recognized in OCI that was recognized in net income at settlement In addition to the above new requirements, existing fair value disclosure requirements were modified. The existing requirement under ASC 825 to disclose the fair value of all financial instruments (including those measured at amortized cost) no longer applies to entities who are not PBEs. Available for early adoption Entities that are not PBEs can early adopt the provision to not disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost in financial statements of fiscal years or interim periods that have not been made available for issuance. With some exceptions, including equity securities accounted for under the measurement alternative, trade receivables and payables due in one year or less, and demand deposit liabilities, PBEs remain subject to the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost and will be required to determine the fair value in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820; however, they are no longer required to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost. As an alternative to disclosure in the footnotes, the fair value may be presented parenthetically on the face of the statement of financial position. Middle market insights The requirement for PBEs to determine the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost in accordance with ASC 820 could represent a significant change for middle market financial institutions that have been using an entry price approach to estimate the fair value of loans for disclosure purposes based on the example contained within ASC All entities remain subject to the requirement to provide the fair value disclosures contained in ASC 820 for those financial instruments that are measured at fair value in periods subsequent to initial recognition. Lastly, there are additional interim and annual disclosure requirements contained in ASU that are consistent with ASC related to the change in accounting principle. Effective date and transition ASU is effective for PBEs for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For those entities that are not PBEs, ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, Early adoption is permitted for all entities upon issuance of ASU for the provision related to recognizing in OCI the changes in the fair value of an entity s own liabilities attributable to instrument-specific credit risk when the fair value option has been elected. In addition, for entities other than PBEs: (a) early adoption is permitted upon issuance of ASU for the provision related to the elimination of the fair value disclosure requirements for financial instruments reported at amortized cost and (b) early adoption of the new provisions in their totality is permitted upon the effective date for PBEs. For the provisions they are permitted to early adopt, PBEs can only make the election to early adopt in financial statements that have not yet been issued and entities other than PBEs can only make the election to early adopt in financial statements that have not yet been made available for issuance. ASU is effective for PBEs for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, In other words, PBEs with fiscal years beginning between December 5
6 15, 2017, and June 15, 2018, are not required to adopt ASU until the interim period beginning after June 15, PBEs with fiscal years beginning between June 15, 2018, and December 15, 2018, are not required to adopt ASU before adopting ASU For all other entities, the effective date for ASU is the same as the effective date in ASU Transition is prospective as it relates to: (a) the measurement alternative for equity securities without readily determinable fair values that exist as of the adoption date and the related disclosure requirements and (b) the requirement for PBEs to determine the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost in accordance with an exit price notion under ASC 820. If, as a result of the prospective application of this latter provision, the prior year amounts are no longer comparable, this fact should be disclosed and explained. Transition for all other aspects of ASU is through a cumulative effect adjustment to the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is applied. (As clarified by ASU , this includes transition for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value for which the measurement alternative is not elected.) Insurance entities that elect the measurement alternative for any equity securities that do not have a readily determinable fair value will face transition nuances associated with any amounts that are recorded in OCI for these securities on the date of adoption. (Due to industry guidance contained in ASC , insurance entities subject to its scope are required to report unrealized gains and losses on equity securities that do not have a readily determinable fair value in OCI.) Given that transition is prospective for equity securities accounted for under the measurement alternative and given that as noted in the Basis for Conclusions of ASU , the guidance does not prescribe a methodology that should be used to prospectively recognize any amounts in OCI, an insurance entity subject to the guidance in Topic 944, Financial Services Insurance, should select a methodology and apply it consistently to all equity securities for which the measurement alternative is elected. Planning for implementation Given that ASU has started coming into effect (beginning in the first quarter of 2018 for calendar year-end public business entities), we encourage all entities to be focused on implementation. In that regard, questions such as the following should be considered: If you elect the fair value option for any liabilities, how will you quantify changes in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk? Would it make sense to elect the measurement alternative for any qualifying equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values? If so, what processes will you put in place to: (a) reassess individual securities to determine if they continue to qualify for the exception, (b) determine what relevant observable price changes occurred and (c) assess impairment? What will be the impact to key performance measures and the ramifications of the volatility associated with recording changes in the fair value of equity securities through net income? How will you manage the expectations of investors, lenders and other key stakeholders? If you previously evaluated the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets associated with AFS debt securities in isolation, what impact will evaluating it in conjunction with other deferred tax items have? If you are a PBE that determines the fair value of loans using an entrance price for disclosure purposes, how will you estimate fair value based on an exit price in accordance with ASC 820? What changes may otherwise be necessary to systems, processes and controls to comply with the accounting and disclosure changes in ASU ? Convergence On July 24, 2014, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) completed its project on financial instruments by issuing amendments to IFRS 9. As amended, IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with early application permitted. Convergence was not achieved, despite the fact that financial instruments began as a joint project of the IASB and the FASB. Divergence may, in fact, be greater than when the joint project began. Some of the more notable differences relate to the following guidance in IFRS 9: An entity can elect to account for certain equity investments at fair value through OCI rather than account for them at fair value through net income. Classification of other financial assets is based on the contractual cash flow characteristics (CCFC) of the instrument and the business model in which the assets are managed. Depending on the facts and 6
7 circumstances, the accounting outcome could be fair value through net income, fair value through OCI or amortized cost for both loans and debt securities. Financial assets are no longer subject to the derivative bifurcation requirements. The fair value option is more restrictive compared to ASC 825 in U.S. GAAP. The following chart provides a comparison of current U.S. GAAP to the requirements of ASU as clarified and IFRS 9. The discussion for specific financial instruments assumes the fair value option has not been elected. For those financial assets subject to credit risk (e.g., debt securities, loans), the discussion of the requirements of ASU is supplemented with a mention of how credit losses will be recognized and measured based on ASU , Financial Instruments Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. For additional information about the new credit losses standard, refer to our in-depth white paper, Financial instruments: In-depth analysis of new standard on credit losses. The IASB impairment model is contained within IFRS 9 and generally requires lifetime expected credit loss recognition for those instruments within its scope for which there have been significant increases in credit risk since initial recognition and 12-month expected credit loss recognition for other instruments within its scope. Financial instrument Equity securities with readily determinable fair values (excluding those accounted for under the equity method) Current U.S. GAAP Classified as trading securities and accounted for at fair value through net income (FV-NI) or classified as AFS securities and accounted for at fair value through OCI (FV-OCI) ASU and ASU FV-NI IFRS 9 FV-NI, unless election is made for FV- OCI for securities not held for trading For AFS equity securities that are determined to be other than temporarily impaired (OTTI), the full amount of impairment is recognized in net income Accounted for under the cost method with recognition of OTTI Equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values (excluding those accounted for under the equity method) FV-NI except those securities that qualify for the measurement alternative and for which it has been elected, which are accounted for at cost as adjusted through net income for observable price changes and impairment No change to current U.S. GAAP FV-NI, unless election is made for FV- OCI for securities not held for trading Equity investments that give the investor the ability to exercise significant influence Accounted for under the equity method as described in ASC 323 Accounted for under the equity method as described in International Accounting Standard 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures 7
8 Financial instrument Debt security Current U.S. GAAP Classified as trading, AFS or held to maturity (HTM) and accounted for at: FV-NI if trading FV-OCI if AFS Amortized cost if HTM Impairment is recognized on AFS and HTM debt securities if they are OTTI. If the entity intends to sell the security or will more likely than not be required to sell before recovery, full impairment is recognized in net income. Otherwise, credit loss is recognized in net income, and the remainder is recognized in OCI ASU and ASU No change to current U.S. GAAP related to classification and measurement As it relates to impairment, current U.S. GAAP was retained for AFS debt securities with some modification, including that credit losses will be recognized through an allowance, limited to the amount by which the amortized cost of an individual security exceeds its fair value, that will be reversed as cash flow expectations improve. Expected credit losses on HTM debt securities will be recognized through an allowance regardless of whether fair value is below amortized cost IFRS 9 Amortized cost, FV- OCI or FV-NI based on the business model for managing the assets and CCFC Impairment recognized under the IASB expected loss model summarized earlier Loans receivable Amortized cost Lower of cost or fair value if held for sale Impairment is recognized for probable losses through an allowance No change to current U.S. GAAP for classification and measurement Credit losses that are expected to occur over the life of loans carried at amortized cost will be recognized through an allowance Amortized cost, FV- OCI or FV-NI based on the business model for managing the assets and CCFC Impairment recognized under the IASB expected loss model summarized earlier Financial liabilities (generally) Amortized cost No change to current U.S. GAAP Amortized cost 8
9 Financial instrument Fair value option Hybrid financial assets Hybrid financial liabilities Standalone, undesignated derivative assets and liabilities Current U.S. GAAP Can elect for recognized financial assets and liabilities (amongst other items) with certain exclusions, including consolidated entities, demand deposit liabilities and instruments classified in part in equity (e.g., convertible debt for which a beneficial conversion feature was separately recognized in equity) If elected, all changes in fair value are recognized through net income Embedded derivative is bifurcated and recorded at fair value if required under ASC 815, with the host contract following the accounting applicable to the type of host Embedded derivative is bifurcated and recorded at fair value if required under ASC 815 with the host contract following the accounting applicable to the type of host ASU and ASU No change from current U.S. GAAP related to applicability; however, changes in the fair value of liabilities attributable to instrument-specific credit risk should be recorded through OCI instead of earnings No change to current U.S. GAAP No change to current U.S. GAAP IFRS 9 FV-NI FV-NI FV-NI Can elect for financial assets if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch Can elect for certain financial liabilities with embedded derivatives. Can also elect for financial liabilities when doing so results in more relevant information because either: (a) it eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch or (b) a group of financial liabilities or financial assets and financial liabilities is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis. Changes in fair value attributable to the credit risk of the liability are recognized through OCI unless such treatment would create or increase an accounting mismatch Entire asset is classified at amortized cost, FV-OCI or FV-NI based on the business model for managing the asset and CCFC. No separate recognition of embedded derivatives Similar to U.S. GAAP 9
10 rsmus.com This document contains general information, may be based on authorities that are subject to change, and is not a substitute for professional advice or services. This document does not constitute audit, tax, consulting, business, financial, investment, legal or other professional advice, and you should consult a qualified professional advisor before taking any action based on the information herein. RSM US LLP, its affiliates and related entities are not responsible for any loss resulting from or relating to reliance on this document by any person. Internal Revenue Service rules require us to inform you that this communication may be deemed a solicitation to provide tax services. This communication is being sent to individuals who have subscribed to receive it or who we believe would have an interest in the topics discussed. RSM US LLP is a limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. RSM and the RSM logo are registered trademarks of RSM International Association. The power of being understood is a registered trademark of RSM US LLP RSM US LLP. All Rights Reserved. wp-nt-as-all-0418
Financial instruments: FASB issues standard on recognition and measurement
Financial instruments: FASB issues standard on recognition and measurement Prepared by: Faye Miller, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP faye.miller@rsmus.com, +1 410 246 9194 January
More informationReady for New Classification & Measurement Rules for Financial Instruments?
Ready for New Classification & Measurement Rules for Financial Instruments? While the effective date has arrived for public business entities (PBE) to implement Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01,
More informationNew Measurement & Classification Guidance for Financial Instruments
New Measurement & Classification Guidance for Financial Instruments On January 5, 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, Financial Instruments
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-30 Updated 15 March 2018 Technical Line FASB final guidance A closer look at the new guidance on recognizing and measuring financial instruments In this issue: Overview... 1 Equity investments...
More informationAccounting for financial instruments: Overview of FASB s exposure draft on recognition and measurement
Accounting for financial instruments: Overview of FASB s exposure draft on recognition and measurement Contact: Faye Miller, Director, National Accounting Standards Group, McGladrey LLP faye.miller@mcgladrey.com
More informationFinancial instruments
Financial instruments Recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities US GAAP December 2017 kpmg.com/us/frv Contents Foreword... 1 About this publication... 2 1. Executive summary...
More informationComparison of the FASB s and the IASB s Proposed Models for Financial Instruments (as of May 2010)
Comparison of the FASB s and the IASB s Proposed Models for Financial Instruments (as of May 2010) The following table provides a side-by-side comparison of the FASB s and the IASB s proposed models for
More informationCertain investments in debt and equity securities
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Certain investments in debt and equity securities (after the adoption of ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
More informationCertain investments in debt and equity securities
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Certain investments in debt and equity securities (before the adoption of ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
More informationFinancial Instruments Overall (Subtopic )
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: February 14, 2013 Comments Due: May 15, 2013 Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
More informationSimplified accounting for private companies: Certain interest rate swaps
Simplified accounting for private companies: Certain interest rate swaps Prepared by: Faye Miller, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP faye.miller@rsmus.com, +1 410 246 9194 Paige
More informationKPMG s CFO Financial Forum Webcast
KPMG s CFO Financial Forum Webcast FASB Proposes Changes to Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments February 27, 2013 Enrique Tejerina Joe Santucci Luba Liberman Administrative CPE regulations
More informationChanges to revenue recognition for franchisors
Changes to revenue recognition for franchisors Prepared by: Chris Banse, Partner, RSM US LLP +1 972 764 7061, chris.banse@rsmus.com Daniel Sullivan, Senior Manager, RSM US LLP +1 617 241 1492, daniel.sullivan@rsmus.com
More informationRevenue recognition considerations for member-owned private clubs
Revenue recognition considerations for member-owned private clubs Prepared by: Phil Newman, Partner, RSM US LLP phil.newman@rsmus.com, +1 239 513 6595 Ryan McAndrew, Manager RSM US LLP ryan.mcandrew@rsmus.com,
More informationSeptember 1, Mr. Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
Deloitte & Touche LLP Ten Westport Road PO Box 820 Wilton, CT 06897-0820 Tel: +1 203 761 3000 Fax: +1 203 834 2200 www.deloitte.com Mr. Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards
More informationFASB Financial Instruments Project
FASB Financial Instruments Project June 18, 2013 2:00 3:15 pm Presented by: Jean Joy, CPA Director of Financial Institutions Wolf & Company, P.C. 99 High Street Boston, MA 02110 P: (617) 428-5432 E: jjoy@wolfandco.com
More informationFair value measurement
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Fair value measurement Revised October 2017 To our clients and other friends Fair value measurements and disclosures continue to be topics of interest
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2017-09 16 March 2017 Technical Line FASB final guidance How the new credit impairment standard will affect entities outside the financial services industry In this issue: Overview... 1 Key considerations...
More informationAccounting and Auditing Update. Erika Skouras, Senior Manager, Moss Adams
Accounting and Auditing Update Erika Skouras, Senior Manager, Moss Adams Over the Next Hour 2 Providing the group with an update on accounting standards and other accounting/industry related matters impacting
More informationFINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF NEW STANDARD ON CREDIT LOSSES
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF NEW STANDARD ON CREDIT LOSSES Prepared by: Faye Miller, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP faye.miller@rsmus.com, +1 410 246 9194 Mike
More informationAudit Tax Advisory Risk Performance Crowe Horwath LLP 1
PACB Annual Convention FASB s Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model: Navigating the Changes September 28, 2015 Matthew Schell, Partner Crowe Horwath LLP Washington, DC 2015 Crowe Horwath LLP 1 Agenda
More informationCredit impairment. Handbook US GAAP. March kpmg.com/us/frv
Credit impairment Handbook US GAAP March 2018 kpmg.com/us/frv Contents Foreword... 1 About this publication... 2 1. Executive summary... 4 Subtopic 326-20 2. Scope of Subtopic 326-20... 14 3. Recognition
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2018-09 4 October 2018 Technical Line FASB final guidance What s changing under the new standard on credit losses? In this issue: Overview... 1 Key considerations... 2 Effective date and transition...
More informationMAIDEN REINSURANCE LTD. Financial Statements
Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 The report accompanying these financial statements was issued by BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member of
More informationA guide to accounting for debt and equity instruments in financing transactions
A guide to accounting for debt and equity instruments in financing transactions Prepared by: RSM US LLP National Professional Standards Group Faye Miller, Partner, faye.miller@rsmus.com, +1 410 246 9194
More informationCredit impairment under ASC 326
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Credit impairment under ASC 326 Recognizing credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost, AFS debt securities and certain beneficial
More informationSimplified accounting for private companies: Certain intangible assets
Simplified accounting for private companies: Certain intangible assets Prepared by: Brian H. Marshall, Partner, National Professional Standards Group, RSM US LLP brian.marshall@rsmus.com, +1 203 905 5014
More informationBusiness Development Companies (BDCs) Accounting for loan transfers
Business Development Companies (BDCs) Accounting for loan transfers Prepared by: Jon Waterman, Partner, Business Development Companies National Practice Leader, RSM US LLP jonathan.waterman@rsmus.com,
More informationAN OFFERING FROM BDO S NATIONAL ASSURANCE PRACTICE SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING & REPORTING MATTERS
AN OFFERING FROM BDO S NATIONAL ASSURANCE PRACTICE SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING & REPORTING MATTERS Significant Accounting & Reporting Matters Second Quarter 2011 1 FIRST QUARTER 2016 BDO is the brand name for
More informationAPPENDIX A: APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR ASC 805
APPENDIX A: APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR ASC 805 A GUIDE TO ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS COMBINATIONS This application checklist is part of RSM US LLP s A Guide to Accounting for Business Combinations and should
More informationEquity method investments and joint ventures
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Equity method investments and joint ventures October 2017 To our clients and other friends Investors frequently enter into transactions in which they
More informationACCOUNTING FOR DEBT AND EQUITY INSTRUMENTS IN FINANCING TRANSACTIONS
ACCOUNTING FOR DEBT AND EQUITY INSTRUMENTS IN FINANCING TRANSACTIONS Prepared by: RSM US LLP National Professional Standards Group Faye Miller, Partner, faye.miller@rsmus.com, +1 410 246 9194 Monique Cole,
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2016-24 12 October 2016 Technical Line FASB final guidance A closer look at the new credit impairment standard All entities will need to change the way they recognize and measure impairment of financial
More informationTechnical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic ) No February 2018
No. 2018-03 February 2018 Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities An Amendment
More informationFASB/IASB/SEC Update. American Accounting Association. Tom Linsmeier FASB Member August 4, 2014
American Accounting Association FASB/IASB/SEC Update Tom Linsmeier FASB Member August 4, 2014 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter. Official positions of the FASB are reached
More informationEquity method investments and joint ventures
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Equity method investments and joint ventures July 2016 To our clients and other friends Investors frequently enter into transactions in which they
More informationThird Quarter 2009 Reminders. Accounting and Reporting Matters
A & A Updates Third Quarter 2009 Reminders The following discussion is intended to be a reminder of recently issued accounting and auditing standards and other guidance that may affect our clients in the
More informationFORM 10-Q FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON D.C
FORM 10-Q FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON D.C. 20429 Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2018
More informationTechnical Line FASB final guidance
No. 2018-04 Updated 4 October 2018 Technical Line FASB final guidance A closer look at the FASB s new hedge accounting standard Revised 4 October 2018 In this issue: Overview... 1 Key provisions of the
More informationAccounting and Auditing Update TRAVIS SMITH, CPA, CGMA
Accounting and Auditing Update TRAVIS SMITH, CPA, CGMA Moss Adams Presenter Travis Smith, CPA, CGMA Partner National Credit Union Practice 480.366.8341 travis.smith@mossadams.com Travis has practiced public
More informationAccounting for Financial Instruments
Accounting for Financial Instruments Summary of Decisions Reached to Date During Redeliberations As of October 31, 2012 The Summary of Decisions Reached to Date is provided for the information and convenience
More informationFair value measurement
Fair value measurement Questions and answers US GAAP and IFRS $ December 2017 kpmg.com Contents Contents Comparability is the challenge 1 About the standards 2 About this publication 4 A. An introduction
More informationMay 15, Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 Norwalk, CT
Deloitte & Touche LLP Ten Westport Road PO Box 820 Wilton, CT 06897-0820 Tel: +1 203 761 3000 Fax: +1 203 834 2200 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards
More informationFASB issues revisions to consolidation guidance
FASB issues revisions to consolidation guidance Prepared by: Richard Stuart, Partner, McGladrey LLP 203.905.5027, richard.stuart@mcgladrey.com March 2015 Overview In February 2015, the Financial Accounting
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606)
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606) Revised August 2017 To our clients and other friends The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB
More informationAccounting Update McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Accounting Update 2014 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. Carol Hubbard Biography chubbard@beenegarter.com Carol is the partner-in-charge of the audit department at Beene Garter LLP and has over 29 years
More informationCurrent Expected Credit Losses (CECL) for Mortgage Banking
Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) for Mortgage Banking November 15, 2017 Presented by: Matthew Streadbeck, Partner, Ernst & Young LLP Carrie Kennedy, Partner, Moss Adams, LLP Jonathan Prejean, Managing
More informationEquity method investments
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Equity method investments September 2015 To our clients and other friends Investors frequently enter into transactions in which they make significant
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationAccounting for Financial Instruments: A Comprehensive Update on the Joint Project
The Dbriefs Financial Reporting series presents: Accounting for Financial Instruments: A Comprehensive Update on the Joint Project Robert Uhl, Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP Magnus Orrell, Director, Deloitte
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606)
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606) Revised August 2016 To our clients and other friends In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards
More informationSTAT / GAAP Update. April 26, 2018
STAT / GAAP Update April 26, 2018 Agenda STAT NAIC update Insurance statutory reporting GAAP ASU 2016-01, Recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities Financial instruments
More informationHeads Up. IASB Issues IFRS on Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets.
vember 17, 2009 Volume 16, Issue 42 Heads Up In This Issue: Introduction Scope Classification Classification Criteria Equity Investments Embedded Derivatives Application Issues Reclassification Impact
More informationIllustrative Financial Statement Alternative Investment Funds. December 31, 2018
Illustrative Financial Statement Alternative Investment Funds December 31, 2018 These materials contain sample financial statements for private domestic and offshore investment companies including master
More informationSession 15PD: GAAP Hot Topics. Moderator: Presenters: Anne Potas
Session 15PD: GAAP Hot Topics Moderator: Presenters: Anne Potas SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer Hot topics in GAAP reporting Anne Potas 28 August 2017 Disclaimer The material contained
More informationShort-duration contract disclosures: Implementing ASU
Short-duration contract disclosures: Implementing ASU 2015-09 Prepared by: Joe Lee, Senior Manager, RSM US LLP joe.lee@rsmus.com, +1 515 281 9214 September 2017 Overview In October 2008, the Financial
More informationOriginal SSAP: SSAP No. 100; Current Authoritative Guidance: SSAP No. 100R
Statutory Issue Paper No. 157 Use of Net Asset Value STATUS Finalized November 6, 2017 Original SSAP: SSAP No. 100; Current Authoritative Guidance: SSAP No. 100R Type of Issue: Common Area SUMMARY OF ISSUE
More informationFinancial Instruments Impairment
Financial Instruments Impairment SPECIAL REPORT New Product or Service of the Year Content Content Marketing Solution 2 Financial Instruments Impairment Financial Instruments Impairment Financial instruments
More informationDefining Issues September 2013, No
Defining Issues September 2013, No. 13-43 Redeliberations Begin on Impairment, Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments At their September 2013 joint meeting, the FASB and IASB (the Boards)
More informationSEC auditor independence considerations
SEC auditor independence considerations When a private equity fund portfolio company may have an initial public offering If a private equity fund portfolio company is considering an initial public offering
More informationUpcoming Significant GAAP Accounting Pronouncements as of
8-31-2018 Below is a list of finalized upcoming significant GAAP guidance that are not yet in effect as of August 31, 2018. If you have any questions about these upcoming guidances, please contact the
More informationFair Value Measurement
U.S. GAAP AND IFRS Fair Value Measurement Questions and Answers November 2013 kpmg.com Contents Substantial Convergence 1 About this Publication 2 Summary of Differences Between U.S. GAAP and IFRS 3 Questions
More informationGeneral information. Summary of significant accounting policies, estimates and judgments
Note 1 General information Royal Bank of Canada and its subsidiaries (the Bank) provide diversified financial services including personal and commercial banking, wealth management, insurance, investor
More information10 September Mr. Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5166 Norwalk, CT
e Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: 212 773 3000 www.ey.com 1810-100 Mr. Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5166 Norwalk,
More informationREVENUE RECOGNITION FOR BROKER-DEALERS AND INVESTMENT ADVISERS
REVENUE RECOGNITION FOR BROKER-DEALERS AND INVESTMENT ADVISERS December 7, 2017 RSM US LLP. All Rights Reserved. Your instructors Tracy Whetstone Partner, National Professional Standards Group Chicago,
More informationReporting High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) Exposures
Supplemental Instructions: June 2018 Holding Company Reports Reporting High Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) Exposures Section 214 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection
More informationREPORTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 117 Reports 117 Management s responsibility for financial reporting 117 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 118 Management s Report on
More informationVoya Financial, Inc.
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly
More informationAssociated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited
Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and Independent Auditors Report ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS
More informationREPORTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 117 Reports 118 Management s Responsibility for Financial Reporting 118 Management s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 119 Report of Independent
More informationDerivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)
No. 2017-12 August 2017 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification The FASB Accounting Standards
More informationThe FR Y-9C instructions, including the Glossary entry for Derivative Contracts, will be revised to conform to the ASU at a future date.
Supplemental Instructions: September 2017 Holding Company Reports Accounting for Hedging Activities In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
More informationNortheastern University Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Financial Statements Index Page(s) Report of Independent Auditors... 1 2 Consolidated Financial Statements Statements of Financial Position... 3 Statement of Activities... 4 Statements of
More informationFORM 10-Q FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON D.C
FORM 10-Q FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON D.C. 20429 Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended: September 30,
More informationGAAP & IFRS Updates: What you need to know
GAAP & IFRS Updates: What you need to know Claire Gemmell Account Manager Rhead Hatch Product Owner Learning Objectives Identify differences in the classification and measurement of financial instruments
More informationAPPENDIX A Important Implementation Dates
APPENDIX A Important Implementation Dates The following table contains significant implementation dates and deadlines for FASB/EITF/PCC and GASB standards. FASB/EITF/PCC Implementation Dates ASU 2018-08,
More informationRevenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606)
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606) August 2015 To our clients and other friends In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
More informationThird Quarter 2018 Standard Setter Update
Third Quarter 2018 Standard Setter Update Financial reporting and accounting developments (current through 30 September 2018) October 2018 To our clients and other friends This Third Quarter 2018 Standard
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationNotes to the consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) is a diversified financial institution governed by the Bank Act (Canada). CIBC was formed through the amalgamation
More informationAccounting and Financial Reporting Developments for Private Companies
Accounting and Financial Reporting Developments for Private Companies THIRD QUARTER UPDATE 2017 The Quarterly Newsletter is a quarterly publication from EKS&H s Technical Accounting and Auditing Group.
More informationJoint Statement on the New Accounting Standard on Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation National Credit Union Administration Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Joint Statement on the New Accounting
More informationPILGRIM BANCSHARES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationNortheastern University Report on Federal Financial Assistance Programs in Accordance with the OMB Uniform Guidance For the Year Ended June 30, 2016
Report on Federal Financial Assistance Programs in Accordance with the OMB Uniform Guidance For the Year Ended June 30, 2016 Entity Identification #04-1679980 Contents Part I Consolidated Financial Statements
More informationFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACCOUNTING AND TAX UPDATE
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACCOUNTING AND TAX UPDATE Key 2017 year-end accounting and tax issues for financial institutions November 15, 2017 Presenters Mike Lundberg, National Financial Institutions Assurance
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationAcronyms 17th edition Contents of booklet current as of 15 November 2016
Changes to the financial reporting framework in Singapore November 2016 The information in this booklet was prepared by the IFRS Centre of Excellence* of Deloitte & Touche LLP in Singapore ( Deloitte Singapore
More informationCECL WHY IT S A BIG DEAL AND WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TO FULFILL YOUR OVERSIGHT ROLE. New Jersey Bankers Association Annual Conference May 2017
CECL WHY IT S A BIG DEAL AND WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TO FULFILL YOUR OVERSIGHT ROLE New Jersey Bankers Association Annual Conference May 2017 1 TODAY S PRESENTERS Faye Miller Partner, National Professional
More informationAccounting & Auditing Update
Accounting & Auditing Update Rebecca Radell, Senior Manager Chris Hughes, Senior Manager Moss Adams Presenters Rebecca Radell, Senior Manager 209.955.6136 rebecca.radell@mossadams.com Rebecca has practiced
More informationThe significance of an impairment model to the re-introduction of recycling and a modified IAS 39 approach - Issues Paper
EFRAG TEG-CFSS meeting 20 September 2017 Paper 11-02 EFRAG Secretariat: F. Poli, J. Waldier, I. Chatzieffraimidou This paper has been prepared by the EFRAG Secretariat for discussion at a public meeting
More informationRecent Significant Developments in Fair Value Accounting
October 15, 2009 Recent Significant Developments in Fair Value Accounting This memorandum discusses four recent significant developments relating to Accounting Standards Codification ( ASC ) Topic 820,
More informationAssociated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited
Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and Independent Auditors
More informationFASB Insurance Contracts
GAAP and SEC Update FASB Insurance Contracts FASB Initiatives Short-Duration Contracts (Final Standard ASU 2015-09 Issued May 2015) Long-Duration Contracts (Beginning) Focused efforts on targeted improvements
More informationRobert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated. Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition As of June 30, 2018
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition As of Table of Contents Page Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition 1-2 3-28 Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
More informationQuarterly Accounting Update: On the Horizon The following selected FASB exposure drafts and projects are outstanding as of April 12, 2015.
Quarterly Accounting Update: On the Horizon The following selected FASB exposure drafts and projects are outstanding as of April 12, 2015. Proposed Delay of Effective Date for Revenue Recognition Standard
More informationBALANCE SHEET AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2014 (UA thousands Note B)
Chapter 7 African Development Bank BALANCE SHEET AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2014 (UA thousands Note B) ASSETS 2014 2013 CASH 406,709 954,133 DEMAND OBLIGATIONS 3,801 3,801 SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER RESALE AGREEMENTS
More informationDEUTSCHE BANK CORPORATION
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month
More informationRIYAD BANK INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 31 March 31 December 31 March 2018 2017 2017 (Unaudited) (Audited) (Unaudited) Notes SAR'000 SAR'000 SAR'000 ASSETS Cash and balances with
More information