South Dakota Board of Regents University Financial Ratios
|
|
- Ross Booth
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ATTACHMENT I 3 South Dakota Board of Regents University Financial Ratios This report provides key financial ratios for 2007 through 2011 for all of the South Dakota public universities. The ratio calculations are based on data from the institutions financial statements which include the university foundations in order to give a fuller, more accurate overall picture of the institution s financial state. Each campus provided a narrative to explain any anomalies or fluctuations in the numbers over the five-year period. The four key ratios provided are: 1) ; 2) Net Operating Revenues Ratio; 3) ; and the 4). These ratios are used to answer four financial questions: 1. Are resources sufficient and flexible enough to support the mission? 2. Do operating results indicate the institution is living within available resources? 3. Does asset performance and management support the strategic direction? 4. Are resources, including debt, managed strategically to advance the mission? In addition, a Composite Financial Index is provided which combines the four core ratios into a single score depicting the financial health of the institution as of a point in time. The is intended to address the question of sufficiency and flexibility for support of the mission. The ratio measures the financial strength of the university by comparing expendable net assets, which includes those assets the university can access and spend quickly to meet obligations, to total expenses at the end of every fiscal year. This ratio identifies the university s financial strength and flexibility by identifying how long the university can function by using reserves without the generation of any new net assets. A primary reserve ratio of.40 or 40% is advisable, implying that the university has the ability to cover over 4 ½ months of expenses. Key items that can impact this ratio include principal payments on debt, using net assets to fund capital construction projects, endowment returns, and total operating expenses. Technical Definition Expendable Net Assets / Total Expenses Financial Reserves / Annual Expenses Ratio Benchmark.40 or 40% Operating Cash / Cushion Against Revenue Shocks / Strategic Investments Net Operating Revenues Ratio The Net Operating Revenues Ratio is intended to indicate if an institution is living within its available resources. Institutions need to generate some level of surplus over long periods of time because operations are one source for reinvestment in future initiatives. Short-term deficits may 1
2 ATTACHMENT I 4 occur as a result of strategic decisions. It is when deficits are unplanned or unmanaged and occurring as a result of core operations that evaluation of operations is necessitated. A positive ratio indicates the university is in good financial condition. An organization should establish a target percentage, and establishing a benchmark should be in line with operating growth. A ratio of 2 to 4 percent indicates the university operated within its means and should be maintained over time; however, fluctuations from year to year are normal. A large ratio identifies an operating surplus and a stronger financial position. While a negative ratio indicates an operating loss for the year, universities need to be careful about too large of a positive ratio, indicating under spending on mission critical initiatives. Net Operating Revenues Ratio Technical Definition Net Operating Income / Total Operating Revenues Annual Gain or Loss / Annual Revenues Ratio Benchmark.02 to.04 or 2% to 4% Ability to: Fund operations / Living within means/ Support new initiatives The is intended to assess if the asset performance and management support the strategic direction. The ratio measures whether the organization is financially better off than in the previous year by measuring total economic return or the level of change in total net assets. This ratio is the most comprehensive measure of growth or decline in wealth over time. There is not a specific threshold; however, 3 to 4 percent is a generally acceptable real rate of return. An improving trend in this ratio indicates the university is increasing its net assets and is likely to be in a position to set aside financial resources to strengthen its future financial flexibility. Key items that may impact this ratio include changes in the net operating revenue ratio, endowment returns, capital gifts and grants, capital transfers, and endowment gifts. A 5- year trend should be the minimum used in evaluation. This indicator can be greatly impacted when borrowing money for a capital project and when the capital item is added to Net Assets. Looking at the trend will even out the anomalies. Technical Definition Change in Net Assets / Total Beginning Net Assets Annual Gain or Loss / Net Assets Ratio Benchmark 3% - 4% Change in overall financial health The is intended to address the question of whether financial resources are being strategically managed to advance the mission of the institution. It measures availability of expendable net assets for coverage of debt should the university be required to settle its obligations as of the date on the balance sheet. A 1:1 ratio is desired, indicating adequate net assets to meet obligations. This ratio is one of the most basic determinants of clear financial health and is regarded as governing a university s ability to assume new debt. A ratio of 1.25 or 2
3 ATTACHMENT I 5 greater indicates a strong creditworthy university with sufficient resources to satisfy debt obligations; however, each university should identify the ratio that is right for its mission specific needs. A viability ratio that falls below 1:1 hinders the university s ability to respond to adverse condition, to secure external capital, and to have flexibility to fund new objectives. Key items that may impact this ratio include principal payments on debt, using net assets for capital construction projects, issuance of new debt, and endowment returns. Technical Definition Expendable Net Assets / Total Long-Term Debt Financial Reserves / Debt Ratio Benchmark 1.0 to 1.25 Debt Coverage Composite Financial Index The Composite Financial Index is built with the values of its four component ratios: 1) Primary Reserve, 2) Net Operating Revenue, 3) Return on Net Assets, and 4). Once each of the four ratios is calculated, further weighting is conducted to measure the relative strength of the score and its importance in the composite score. The CFI combines the four core ratios identified above into a single score. The combination, using a prescribed weighting plan, allows a weakness or strength in one ratio to be offset by another ratio result. The CFI reflects a picture of the financial health of the institution at a point in time. A negative CFI is indicative of a university that may be struggling financially. A score of 1.0 indicates very little financial health; 3.0 is the low benchmark and represent a relatively stronger financial position; a 10.0 is the high benchmark. A ratio of 3.0 or above is preferred. Four Step Process Index Benchmark Composite Financial Index 1. Compute the values of the four core ratios 2. Convert the figures to strength factors along a common scale 3. Multiply the strength factors by specific weighting factors (Primary Reserve and Viability weighted 35%; Net Operating Revenue -10%; Return on Net Assets 20%) 4. Total the resulting four numbers to reach the single CFI score Blended measurement of financial health of the institution 3.0 or above is preferred Communicate overall financial health and trends 3
4 ATTACHMENT I 6 Financial Health CFI Score Direction Weaker Financial Position Relatively Stronger Financial Position Strongest Financial Position -1 to 1 0 to 2 2 to 5 4 to 7 6 to 9 8 to 10 Assess institutional viability to survive Reengineer the institution Direct institutional resources to allow transformation Focus resources to compete in future state Allow experimentation with new initiatives Deploy resources to achieve a robust mission KPMG LLP and Prager, McCarthy & Sealy, LLC developed a scale for assessing the values of the CFI: 4
5 ATTACHMENT I 7 Black Hills State University Including Foundation Information 5 Desired Benchmark Net Operating Revenue Ratio Return on Net Asset Ratio Composite Financial Indicator The measures the financial strength of the university by comparing expendable net assets, which includes those assets the university can access and spend quickly to meet debt obligations, to total expenses at the end of every fiscal year. This ratio identifies the university s financial strength and flexibility by identifying how long the university can function by using reserves without the generation of any new net assets. A primary reserve ratio of.40 is advisable implying that the university has the ability to cover over 4 ½ months of expenses. Key items that can impact this ratio include principal payments on debt, using net assets to fund capital construction projects, endowment returns, and total operating expenses. BHSU s ratio, although below the standard of.40, has remained fairly constant over the previous three fiscal years currently showing over 4 months of operating capacity and a recent trend towards the norm. It is important to recognize that this ratio includes the net assets and expenses of the BHSU Foundation, which were impacted by recent market declines. Net Operating Revenue Ratio The Net Operating Revenue Ratio identifies whether or not the university is living within its available resources. A positive ratio indicates the university is in good financial condition. A ratio of.02 to.04 indicates the university operated within its means and should be maintained over time; however, fluctuations from year to year are normal. A large ratio identifies an operating surplus and a stronger financial position. While a negative ratio indicates an operating loss for the year, universities need to be careful about too large of a positive ratio, indicating under spending on mission critical initiatives. BHSU s net operating revenue ratio has remained fairly consistent over the past four years ranging from a low of.026 to a high of.102. The low is reflective of market declines in The Return on Net Assets ratio measures whether the university is financially better off than in the previous year by measuring total economic return or the level of change in total net assets. This ratio provides the most comprehensive measure of the growth or decline in the total wealth
6 ATTACHMENT I 8 of the university over a specific period of time. A ratio of.03 to.04 is the preferred rate of return. An improving trend in this ratio indicates the university is increasing its net assets and is likely to be in a position to set aside financial resources to strengthen its future financial flexibility. Key items that may impact this ratio include changes in the net operating revenue ratio, endowment returns, capital gifts and grants, capital transfers, and endowment gifts. BHSU s return on net assets ratio remained consistent from FY07 to FY09 with a range of.005 to.060 typically above the preferred rate of return. The low of in FY10 was a result of additional bond issues of over $13.5 million. The FY11 ratio increased dramatically to.557 due to the transfer of the Life Sciences Laboratories and the University Center Rapid City to BHSU s net assets from the South Dakota Building Authority. The measures the availability of expendable net assets to cover debt should the university be required to settle its obligations as of the date on the balance sheet. This ratio is one of the most basic determinants of clear financial health and is regarded as governing a university s ability to assume new debt. A ratio of 1.25 or greater indicates a strong creditworthy university with sufficient resources to satisfy debt obligations; however, each university should identify the ratio that is right for its mission specific needs. A viability ratio that falls below 1.1 hinders the university s ability to respond to adverse condition, to secure external capital, and to have flexibility to fund new objectives. Key items that may impact this ratio include principal payments on debt, using net assets for capital construction projects, issuance of new debt, and endowment returns. BHSU s viability ratio has typically dipped below 1.1 in years where additional debt was issued. The addition of debt for the new residence hall will impact this ratio. Composite Financial Indicator (CFI) The CFI combines the four core ratios identified above into a single score. The combination, using a prescribed weighting plan, allows a weakness or strength in one ratio to be offset by another ratio result. A negative CFI is indicative of a university that may be struggling financially. A score of 1.0 indicated very little financial health; 3.0 is the low benchmark and represent a relatively stronger financial position; a 10.0 is the high benchmark. A ratio of 3.0 or above is preferred. The BHSU CFI has remained relatively steady over the past five years, ranging from a low of to a high of 3.9. The score dipped below 1.0 in FY10, primarily due to the market decline. Recovery of those losses and the addition of building assets are reflected in the FY11 CFI. 6
7 ATTACHMENT I 9 Dakota State University Including Foundation Information Desired Benchmark Net Operating Revenue Ratio Composite Financial Indicator The was negative in both FY09 and FY10. This ratio was significantly influenced by the downturn in the market in the fall of 2008 as the DSU Foundation suffered losses similar to other foundations. The markets have started to rebound and so too has the DSU Foundation financial position. The University has also made a concerted effort to improve this primary reserve ratio through conservative budgeting which is reflected in the positive change from FY10 to FY11. Net Operating Revenue Ratio Net Operating Revenue Ratio was negatively influenced by cuts by the legislature and market influences in FY09, resulting in a negative ratio. Return on Net Assets ratio has been increasing slightly over the last few years with the efforts of conservative budgeting by the University. The was influenced in FY09 and FY10 by the University and DSU Foundation debt along with the negative amount available for unrestricted net assets. The FY11 numbers show improvement and the efforts of the University. Composite Financial Indicator (CFI) The DSU Composite Financial Indicator score (CFI) has fluctuated over the past five years. The CFI score reached a low of -1.0 in FY08. This score was significantly influenced by the Component Unit of DSU, the DSU Foundation. As a result of the downturn in the economy, the financial position of the DSU Foundation was negatively impacted and in turn, negatively impacted several of the ratios and the Total CFI score. Also in FY08, $2.9 million in debt was incurred by the University for the renovation of the DSU Science Center. 7
8 ATTACHMENT I 10 Northern State University Including Foundation Information Desired Benchmark Net Operating Revenue Ratio Composite Financial Indicator The Primary Reserve ratio is a snapshot in time showing how long the organization could operate using their expendable net reserves. The lowest ratio occurred in 2009 due to a combination of events. The University cash balance decreased in 2009 as funds were expended on renovation projects and the Foundation felt the impact of the market situation. It is important to keep in mind that on June 30, all state funds have been expended for the year and revenues are lower during the summer resulting in lower cash balances. Net Operating Revenue Ratio The Net Operating ratio represents the operating outcome for the year. A positive number indicates an operating surplus for the year, while a negative number indicates there was an operating loss for the year. Historically, NSU and the NSU Foundation generate a small surplus each year. In 2009, the negative economy resulted in a loss, however, 2010 ended with an operating surplus. The Return on Net Assets ratio measures whether or not the organization is better off financially than it was the year before. As indicated by the negative ratio in 2009, the results can vary significantly from one year to the next so this information should be viewed over a period of time. Historically, NSU and the NSU Foundation have had a positive ratio indicating a small amount of growth each year. The Viability ratio measures the ability of the organization to settle debt with expendable net assets. This ratio falls below the desired 1:1 level mainly as a result of bonds issued by the university for renovation of residence halls and the Student Union. Revenues for the bond payments are collected each year from students room charges and general activity fees. The revenue generates enough funds to meet the current year payment obligations but does not generate funds to place in reserve for future years. Composite Financial Indicator (CFI) The Composite Financial Index (CFI) is the measurement of the overall health of the institution based on the four core ratios. The CFI can range from -1 for institutions that may be struggling 8
9 ATTACHMENT I 11 to survive to more than 9 for institutions with the strongest financial health. The CFI for NSU and the NSU Foundation has been between 2.3 and 3.3, however, it fell to 0.4 in Once again, the fall of the market in 2009 is reflected in the 2009 score. However, the organization has experienced a steady increase in the last two years. 9
10 ATTACHMENT I 12 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Including Foundation Information Desired Benchmark Net Operating Revenues Return on Net Assets Composite Financial Indicator The primary reserve ratio measures the financial strength of the institution by comparing expendable net assets to total yearly expenses. Expendable net assets represent those assets that can be accessed and spent quickly to satisfy obligations. SDSM&T s primary reserve ratio s decline in FY09 and FY10 was due to increasing total expenses while expendable net assets remain relatively flat, mainly as a result of increased research expenditures and increased interest on new bonds. Net Operating Revenue Ratio The net operating revenues ratio indicates whether total operating activities resulted in a surplus or deficit and if the institution is living within available resources. The fluctuations between FY09 and FY11 are primarily due to an increase in Federal grants and contracts from FY09 to FY10, followed by a decrease in same from FY10 to FY11. The return on net assets ratio determines whether the institution is financially better off than in previous years by measuring total economic return. SDSM&T s return on net assets ratio reflects a declining then recent rebound in rate of return. The Foundation s investment returns have impacted the change in net assets over the last four years. An $11M investment loss in FY09 was followed by a $13.1M gain in FY10. The large gain in Return on Net Assets in FY10 is also due to a large increase in SDSM&T s net assets as a result of $16M in bond proceeds from the South Dakota Building Authority in support of the new Paleontology Building and the addition to the Chemical/Biological Engineering Building. The viability ratio measures the availability of expendable net assets to cover debt should the institution need to settle its obligations as of the balance sheet date. This ratio has remained relatively flat and indicates that SDSM&T, as of the balance sheet date, has sufficient expendable net assets to satisfy debt obligations. Composite Financial Indicator (CFI) The CFI measures the overall health of the institution based on the four core ratios. This measurement typically ranges from -1 for universities with financial struggles to scores of 9-10 for universities with the strongest financial health. SDSM&T s CFI has historically ranged from 10
11 ATTACHMENT I 13 2 to 3 with a dip that occurred during the fall of the market in FY 08 and FY09. The FY11 CFI score of 2.7 represents a relatively steady overall health for SDSMT. 11
12 ATTACHMENT I 14 South Dakota State University Including Foundation Information Desired Benchmark Net Operating Revenues Return on Net Assets Composite Financial Indicator The Primary Reserve ratio is impacted by the amount of SDSU unrestricted net assets and the SDSU Foundation unrestricted net assets. While this ratio has remained relatively stable over the time period, the 2011 ratio reflects a strengthening of SDSU unrestricted net assets as well as SDSU Foundation unrestricted net assets. Net Operating Revenue Ratio The Net Operating Revenue ratio indicates the operating outcome for the year with a positive number indicating a surplus for the year, and a negative number indicating a deficit for the year. SDSU maintains a modest Net Operating Revenue ratio for most years in the time period. The ratios were negative for 2008 and 2009, primarily due to declines in net assets for the SDSU Foundation. The Return on Net Assets ratio reflects the financial condition and whether the institution is financially better off than the previous year. Over the time period, the SDSU Return on Net Assets ratio has improved from a low of in 2007 to a high of in The Viability ratio reflects the availability of expendable net assets to settle debt at the balance sheet date. The decrease in the Viability ratio reflects additional debt incurred for Avera Science, Dairy and Ag Hall renovations, residence halls, food service, and parking facilities as part of the planned improvements to implement SDSU facilities master plans. Composite Financial Indicator (CFI) The SDSU Composite Financial Indicator (CFI) score has remained relatively constant over the period of 2007 to The CFI score has rebounded in the last two years from the negative economic impacts on the SDSU Foundation which impacted several of the financial ratios, most notably the Net Operating Revenue ratio. 12
13 ATTACHMENT I 15 University of South Dakota/SSOM Including Foundation Information 13 Desired Benchmark Net Operating Revenues Return on Net Assets Composite Financial Indicator The primary reserve ratio compares expendable net asset to total expenses. It is an indicator of how long the institution could operate using its reserves. Taken from Strategic Financial Analysis for Higher Education, Reserves are often required for capital expansion or to implement change in the institution s mission. Should these actions be in process, it would be appropriate to expect a temporary decline in this ratio. In FY2009, USD began a capital expansion (Wellness Center and Coyote Village), and the resulting ratio decline is reasonable. Additionally, market values of investments held at the USDF dropped significantly in FY2009, resulting in a USDF deficit Unrestricted Net Assets balance, further lowering the primary reserve ratio. Net Operating Revenues Ratio The net operating revenues ratio measures income/(loss) as a percentage of operating revenues. A positive ratio indicates a surplus. An organization should establish a target percentage, and establishing a benchmark should be in line with operating growth. Generally, a 2 to 4 percent ratio is indicative of an organization living within its resources. USD s ratio has been steady, ranging from 3 to 6 percent annually. The USDF change in net assets was a negative $25 million in FY2009. At the same time, USD had a positive change in net assets of $37 million. So while USD made significant financial gains, the USDF negative change in net assets offset over 2/3rds of the gains. As the financial markets recover, the USDF results have improved, which in turn improved the return on net assets ratio. The viability ratio measures availability of expendable net assets for coverage of debt. A 1:1 ratio is desired, indicating adequate net assets to meet obligations. As stated in Strategic Financial Analysis for Higher Education, If an institution is in the middle of a major capital expansion program, this ratio may well fall to a lower level than an institution that is not. FY2009 dropped below 1.0 because of a $44.5 million bond issue within the last six weeks of the fiscal year. The bond issue was for the construction of two revenue buildings, and to meet the organization s strategic objectives. The debt is reflected in the denominator of this ratio; however, because revenues are received in subsequent years, the unrestricted net assets do not
14 ATTACHMENT I 16 reflect the increased revenues anticipated from the construction of Coyote Village and the Wellness Center. Coyote Village is a residential facility that began revenue collection in FY2011, and the Wellness Center is a revenue facility that began receipt of revenues to support the operation in FY2010. Stabilization of revenues in support of these capital projects has materialized in FY2011 and is reflected in the improvement in the. Composite Financial Index USD s CFI has remained within the Relatively Stronger Financial Position range. As noted in the individual ratios, in FY2009 and FY2010, the USD CFI dropped for two primary reasons. The first was the issuance of an additional debt for the construction of two new revenue producing facilities; Coyote Village a residential housing unit, and the Wellness Center. The debt was issued within the last six weeks of FY2009 with receipt of revenue to support the debt service set to begin in FY2010 for the Wellness Center and FY2011 for the Coyote Village. The second reason for a drop in USD s FY2009 CFI related to the economic downturn and unrealized losses in endowments and other investments on the USD Foundation financial statements. FY2011 s financial statements reflect the realization of the revenues from the new student facilities for payment of the debt service issued in FY2009. Additionally, USD Foundation endowment funds have shown strong performance as the market begins to recover. As presented in the analysis above, USD has invested significant funds in capital expansion. This represents strategic investments to improve competitive position to capture a larger market share of enrollment. Taken comprehensively, the university is investing strategically and with improved future financial wealth in mind. 14
15 ATTACHMENT I 17 South Dakota Board of Regents University Financial Ratios Excluding Foundations The following ratio calculations exclude the Foundations assets and activities for the years FY07 to FY11. It is important to note that the exclusion of Foundation information is contrary to the guidance provided for the calculation of these ratios and makes comparison of the South Dakota public universities to other universities impossible. This data isolates the activities of the universities and should only serve to make comparisons between our own universities and to look for trends over time. The benchmarks are no longer valid because they were developed assuming the Foundations were included. The descriptions of the ratios are still relevant and provide guidance on their use and what may impact them. The is intended to address the question of sufficiency and flexibility for support of the mission. The ratio measures the financial strength of the university by comparing expendable net assets, which includes those assets the university can access and spend quickly to meet obligations, to total expenses at the end of every fiscal year. This ratio identifies the university s financial strength and flexibility by identifying how long the university can function by using reserves without the generation of any new net assets. Key items that can impact this ratio include principal payments on debt, using net assets to fund capital construction projects, and total operating expenses. Technical Definition Expendable Net Assets / Total Expenses Financial Reserves / Annual Expenses Operating Cash / Cushion Against Revenue Shocks / Strategic Investments Net Operating Revenues Ratio The Net Operating Revenues Ratio is intended to indicate if an institution is living within its available resources. Institutions need to generate some level of surplus over long periods of time because operations are one source for reinvestment in future initiatives. Short-term deficits may occur as a result of strategic decisions. It is when deficits are unplanned or unmanaged and occurring as a result of core operations that evaluation of operations is necessitated. A positive ratio indicates the university is in good financial condition. An organization should establish a target percentage, and establishing a benchmark should be in line with operating growth. A large ratio identifies an operating surplus and a stronger financial position. While a negative ratio indicates an operating loss for the year, universities need to be careful about too large of a positive ratio, indicating under spending on mission critical initiatives. Technical Definition Net Operating Revenues Ratio Net Operating Income / Total Operating Revenues Annual Gain or Loss / Annual Revenues Ability to: Fund operations / Living within means/ Support new initiatives 15
16 ATTACHMENT I 18 The is intended to assess if the asset performance and management support the strategic direction. The ratio measures whether the organization is financially better off than in the previous year by measuring total economic return or the level of change in total net assets. This ratio is the most comprehensive measure of growth or decline in wealth over time. An improving trend in this ratio indicates the university is increasing its net assets and is likely to be in a position to set aside financial resources to strengthen its future financial flexibility. Key items that may impact this ratio include changes in the net operating revenue ratio, capital gifts and grants, capital transfers. A 5-year trend should be the minimum used in evaluation. This indicator can be greatly impacted when borrowing money for a capital project and when the capital item is added to Net Assets. Looking at the trend will even out the anomalies. Technical Definition Change in Net Assets / Total Beginning Net Assets Annual Gain or Loss / Net Assets Change in overall financial health The is intended to address the question of whether financial resources are being strategically managed to advance the mission of the institution. It measures availability of expendable net assets for coverage of debt should the university be required to settle its obligations as of the date on the balance sheet. A minimum of a 1:1 ratio is desired, indicating adequate net assets to meet obligations. This ratio is one of the most basic determinants of clear financial health and is regarded as governing a university s ability to assume new debt. A viability ratio that falls below 1:1 hinders the university s ability to respond to adverse condition, to secure external capital, and to have flexibility to fund new objectives. Key items that may impact this ratio include principal payments on debt, using net assets for capital construction projects, and issuance of new debt. Technical Definition Expendable Net Assets / Total Long-Term Debt Financial Reserves / Debt Debt Coverage Composite Financial Index The Composite Financial Index is built with the values of its four component ratios: 1) Primary Reserve, 2) Net Operating Revenue, 3) Return on Net Assets, and 4). Once each of the four ratios is calculated, further weighting is conducted to measure the relative strength of the score and its importance in the composite score. The CFI combines the four core ratios identified above into a single score. The combination, using a prescribed weighting plan, allows a weakness or strength in one ratio to be offset by another ratio result. 16
17 ATTACHMENT I 19 Four Step Process Composite Financial Index 1. Compute the values of the four core ratios 2. Convert the figures to strength factors along a common scale 3. Multiply the strength factors by specific weighting factors (Primary Reserve and Viability weighted 35%; Net Operating Revenue -10%; Return on Net Assets 20%) 4. Total the resulting four numbers to reach the single CFI score Blended measurement of financial health of the institution Communicate overall financial health and trends The CFI reflects a picture of the financial health of the institution at a point in time. A negative CFI is indicative of a university that may be struggling financially. The higher the number the stronger the financial position. 17
18 ATTACHMENT I 20 BHSU Excluding Foundation Information Net Operating Revenue Ratio Return on Net Asset Ratio Composite Financial Indicator DSU Excluding Foundation Information Net Operating Revenue Ratio Composite Financial Indicator NSU Excluding Foundation Information Net Operating Revenue Ratio Composite Financial Indicator
19 ATTACHMENT I 21 SDSM&T Excluding Foundation Information Net Operating Revenues Return on Net Assets Composite Financial Indicator SDSU Excluding Foundation Information Net Operating Revenues Return on Net Assets Composite Financial Indicator USD Excluding Foundation Information Net Operating Revenues Return on Net Assets Composite Financial Indicator
Annual Financial Assessment Higher Learning Commission Financial Ratios
Annual Financial Assessment Higher Learning Commission Financial Ratios Financial ratios can be useful tools for measuring and analyzing financial performance, understanding and communicating financial
More informationHigher Learning Commission (HLC) Ratios Black Hills State University
Black Hills State University.374 0.345 0.351 0.304 0.467.012 (0.010) 0.065 0.093 0.024 Return on Net Asset Ratio.042 0.089 0.462 0.061 0.023 1.421 1.268 1.155 0.868 1.265 Composite Financial Indicator
More informationUniversity of Maine at Presque Isle. Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index FY06 to FY10
Core Financial s and Composite Financial Index University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Primary Reserve 2 Net Operating Revenues 4 Return
More informationUniversity of Maine at Presque Isle. Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index FY06 to FY13
University of Maine at Presque Isle Core Financial s and Composite Financial Index FY06 to FY13 University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Change in Terminology
More informationUniversity of Southern Maine Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index FY06 to FY11
Core Financial s and Composite Financial Index University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Primary Reserve 2 Net Operating Revenues 4 Return
More informationUniversity of Southern Maine Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index FY06 to FY12
Core Financial s and Composite Financial Index University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Primary Reserve 2 Net Operating Revenues 4 Return
More informationMinnesota State University, Mankato Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Trends and Highlights
Minnesota State University, Mankato Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Trends and Highlights Without GASB 68 (Unfunded Pension Liabilities) Per Full Year Equivalent Student Data Composite Financial Index Benchmark
More informationASSESSING JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE S FISCAL HEALTH USING FINANCIAL RATIOS
ASSESSING JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE S FISCAL HEALTH USING FINANCIAL RATIOS Mission: JCCC inspires learning to transform lives and strengthen communities. Presentation to the JCCC Board of Trustees
More informationUniversity of Maine System and Component Units. Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index. FY10 and FY11
University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Component Units 1 Primary Reserve Ratio 2 Net Operating Revenues Ratio 3 Return on Net Assets
More informationUniversity of Maine System and Component Units. Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index. FY10 to FY12
University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Component Units 1 Primary Reserve Ratio 2 Net Operating Revenues Ratio 3 Return on Net Assets
More informationUniversity of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January Report on Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index
University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2018 on Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Primary Reserve Ratio 2 Net Operating Revenues
More informationREVISED FY 2009 ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL STRENGTH ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA. REVISED March 5, 2010
REVISED FY 2009 ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL STRENGTH OF ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA REVISED March 5, 2010 This document may be accessed at www.azregents.edu
More informationPrepared by the Office of the Treasurer
Prepared by the Office of the Treasurer The Board s Role in Financial Oversight The Board of Trustees is tasked with financial oversight of the College. The Association of Governing Boards of Universities
More informationUniversity of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January Report on Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index
University of Maine System Office of Finance and Treasurer January 2018 on Core Financial Ratios and Composite Financial Index This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Primary Reserve
More informationKEY FINANCIAL METRICS & DASHBOARD REPORTING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS 1/26/2016. January 26, Adam Smith Director
KEY FINANCIAL METRICS & DASHBOARD REPORTING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS January 26, 2016 Jim Creeden Partner jcreeden@bkd.com Adam Smith Director asmith@bkd.com 1 TO RECEIVE CPE CREDIT Participate
More informationFinancial Indicators. FY18 Third Quarter Report
Financial Indicators Third Quarter Report Financial Indicators Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Total Cash Statement for Quarter..... 4 BHSU... 5 DSU.. 6 NSU.. 7 SDSMT.. 8 SDSU/AES/Extension.. 9 USD
More informationKEY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KEY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Strategic Financial Management Fiscal Health Key Financial Indicators Reserves Strategy Operating Performance Return on Financial Resources Debt & Investment Management
More informationPrepared by the Office of the Treasurer
Prepared by the Office of the Treasurer Strategic Financial Management TCNJ s leadership emphasizes long-term fiscal sustainability in its operational and resource allocation decisions. In analyzing and
More informationComposite Financial Index*
Composite Financial Index* The composite financial index (CFI) is a measure of financial health used widely throughout higher education. It relies on information from audited financial statements and utilizes
More informationFinancial analysis. Using financial statements to measure performance at. Michigan State University. MSU s financial statements Analyzing performance
Financial analysis Using financial statements to measure performance at Michigan State University MSU s financial statements Analyzing performance Professor Kirt C. Butler Department of Finance Broad College
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Budget and Finance ******************************************************************************
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Budget and Finance AGENDA ITEM: 7 D DATE: March 27-29, 2018 ****************************************************************************** SUBJECT FY19 Budget Summary CONTROLLING
More informationUSE OF FINANCIAL RATIOS IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
USE OF FINANCIAL RATIOS IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH David Case Vice President for Institutional Research & Effectiveness East Central Community College Decatur, MS WHAT IS A FINANCIAL RATIO?
More informationARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FY 2005 FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS
Board policy 3-410 requires each university to provide the Arizona Board of Regents with audited annual financial reports and a ten-year ratio analysis of selected data from the financial reports. With
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Full Board ******************************************************************************
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Full Board AGENDA ITEM: S DATE: October 12-13, 2011 ****************************************************************************** SUBJECT: Housing and Auxiliary Facilities
More informationFinancial Ratios and Trends
Financial s and Trends (2011 2016) Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning Office of Finance and Administration 3825 Ridgewood Road, Jackson, Mississippi 39211 (601) 432-6316 Are resources sufficient
More informationLEHIGH University. Financial Planning Report With Budget
LEHIGH University Financial Planning Report With 2012-2013 Budget L E H I G H U N I V E R S I T Y 2 0 1 2-1 3 B U D G E T ------------------------- T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S PAGE I. COMMENTARY 1-9
More informationWestfield State University number 0480 Policy concerning: page 1 of 5
Policy concerning: page 1 of 5 I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES DEBT The goal of this policy is to present guidelines for the management of Westfield State University s debt portfolio. For purposes of this policy,
More informationFINANCIAL HOW TO ASSESS AND ENHANCE. Larry L. Orsini, and Brenda M. Snow
HOW TO ASSESS AND ENHANCE FINANCIAL HEALTHBy Lawrence Saint Bonaventure uses a ratio analysis based on a composite financial index to communicate financial strengths and weaknesses and carry out the strategic
More informationFinancial Ratios and Trends
Financial s and Trends (2008 2013) Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning Office of Finance and Administration 3825 Ridgewood Road, Jackson, Mississippi 39211 (601) 432-6561 Are resources sufficient
More informationFinancial Ratios and Trends
Financial s and Trends (2010 2015) Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning Office of Finance and Administration 3825 Ridgewood Road, Jackson, Mississippi 39211 (601) 432-6316 Are resources sufficient
More informationStrategic Issues Related to: University Plan, Performance, and Accountability Report. Finance Committee September 12, 2013
Strategic Issues Related to: University Plan, Performance, and Accountability Report Finance Committee September 12, 2013 University Goal Outstanding Organization Be responsible stewards of resources,
More informationANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015
Hutchinson and Willmar, MN ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Creating Opportunities, Changing Lives. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the year ended June 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page College Administration
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Full Board ******************************************************************************
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Full Board AGENDA ITEM: 17 DATE: August 14, 2014 ****************************************************************************** SUBJECT: 2014B Housing and Auxiliary Facilities
More informationENDs Monitoring Report
ENDs Monitoring Report FINANCE June 12, 2017 Presented To: President Dr. Daniel J. Phelan Jackson College Board of Trustees Presented by: Darrell R. Norris, Vice President of Finance I. Executive Summary
More informationThe University of Texas at San Antonio 2012 Summary of Financial Condition. Financial Condition: Satisfactory
The University of Texas at San Antonio 2012 Summary of Financial Condition Financial Condition: Satisfactory Composite Financial Index Operating Expense Coverage Ratio 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.2 (in months) 6.0 5.1
More information2017 Annual Financial Report
2017 Annual Financial Report Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, Independent Auditors Report, and Management s Discussion and Analysis 3 Independent
More informationFinancial Review FISCAL YEAR 2013
Financial Review FISCAL YEAR 2013 AGENDA Overview Resource Sufficiency & Flexibility Operating Results Financial Asset Performance Debt Management Financial Outlook 2 Achieving the Goals of the EWU Board
More informationThe University of Texas at San Antonio 2015 Summary of Financial Condition. Financial Condition: Satisfactory
The University of Texas at San Antonio 2015 Summary of Financial Condition Financial Condition: Satisfactory Composite Financial Index Operating Expense Coverage Ratio 4.0 3.2 3.7 3.3 2.8 (in months) 7.0
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING. Financial Statements. June 30, 2016 and (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon)
Financial Statements (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon) (THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY) Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 4
More informationOhio University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Statements June 30, 2017 and 2016
(a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Statements Contents Independent Auditor s Report 1-3 Financial Statements Management s Discussion and Analysis 4-12 Statements of Net Position 13-14 Statements
More informationCleveland State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report Including Supplemental Information June 30, 2015
Cleveland State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report Including Supplemental Information June 30, 2015 Contents Report of Independent Auditors 1-3 Management s Discussion
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Budget and Finance ******************************************************************************
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Budget and Finance AGENDA ITEM: 6 A DATE: December 2-3, 2015 ****************************************************************************** SUBJECT: 2015 Housing and Auxiliary
More informationHIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION FINANCIAL RATIO UPDATE
Regular Meeting Agenda Item 7B June 21, 2016 Information Only HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION FINANCIAL RATIO UPDATE Summary: The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) uses specific financial ratios to track institutional
More informationWASHBURN UNIVERSITY OF TOPEKA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2017
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2017 Index Page Independent Auditors Report... 1-3 Management s Discussion And Analysis... 4-24 Financial Statements Statements Of Net Position... 25-26 Statements Of Financial
More informationCleveland State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report Including Supplemental Information June 30, 2017
Cleveland State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report Including Supplemental Information June 30, 2017 Contents Report of Independent Auditors 1-3 Management s Discussion
More informationHIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION FINANCIAL RATIO UPDATE
Regular Meeting Agenda Item 7C May 16, 2017 Informational Item HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION FINANCIAL RATIO UPDATE Summary: The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) uses specific financial ratios to track institutional
More informationINDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Statements of Net Assets 11
University of Idaho Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and Independent Auditors Report Including Single Audit Reports for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TABLE
More informationAn Updated Analysis of the Financial Statements. The University of Akron Academic Years Prepared for AAUP
An Updated Analysis of the Financial Statements of The University of Akron Academic Years 2002-2014 Prepared for AAUP By Rudy Fichtenbaum Professor of Economics Department of Economics Wright State University
More informationARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FY 2007 FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS. Arizona State University Northern Arizona University The University of Arizona
ARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FY 2007 FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS Arizona State University Northern Arizona University The University of Arizona December 18, 2007 This document may be accessed at www.azregents.edu
More informationWright State University Financial Governance Policy DRAFT v.1 With Comments March 31, 2017
Wright State University Financial Governance Policy DRAFT v.1 With Comments March 31, 2017 A. Overview Wright State University is committed to transforming the lives of its students and the communities
More informationUNIVERSITY OF GUELPH. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2016
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Financial Report Summary Information Contents Financial Summary... 2 Revenue... 2 Expenses... 3 Net Income by Major Fund... 3 Net Assets... 3 Capital Expenditures...
More informationI. Financial Diagnostics
Financial, Marketing and Management Diagnostics list I. Financial Diagnostics A. Operations 1. Is the operating net or total net increasing or decreasing; if it is decreasing, why? 2. Are revenue and expense
More informationWASHBURN UNIVERSITY OF TOPEKA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2011
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2011 Index Page Independent Auditors Report... 1-2 Management s Discussion And Analysis... 3-24 Financial Statements Statements Of Net Assets... 25-26 Statements Of Financial
More informationWEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA OF THE STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEARS ENDED TABLE OF CONTENTS YEARS ENDED PAGE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT...1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION
More informationWayne State University. Financial Report September 30, 2005
Financial Report September 30, 2005 Contents Independent Auditor s Report 1 Financial Statements Management s Discussion and Analysis - Unaudited 2-18 Balance Sheets 19 Statements of Revenues, Expenses
More informationFive-Year Financial Analysis Mary H. Loomis, CPA, MPA Assistant Vice-President, Business & Finance/Comptroller
Five-Year Financial Analysis Mary H. Loomis, CPA, MPA Assistant Vice-President, Business & Finance/Comptroller 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Discussion of Net Pension Obligation for the Fiscal
More informationTHE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA
Financial Statements June 30, 2018 and 2017 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Auditors Report 1 3 Management s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 4 10 Financial
More informationThe William Paterson University of New Jersey
The William Paterson University of New Jersey (A Component Unit of the State of New Jersey) Financial Statements and Management s Discussion and Analysis Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors Report
More informationCleveland State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report with Supplemental Information June 30, 2018
Cleveland State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report with Supplemental Information June 30, 2018 Contents Independent Auditor s Report 1-3 Management s Discussion and Analysis
More informationWest Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission
West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission Financial Statements and Additional Information for the Year Ended June 30, 2002, and Independent Auditors Reports WEST VIRGINIA HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
More informationKent State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio)
Kent State University (a component unit of the State of Ohio) Financial Report Including Supplementary Information June 30, 2018 Table of Contents June 30, 2018 and 2017 Page(s) Independent Auditor s Report...
More informationWASHBURN UNIVERSITY OF TOPEKA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2016
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2016 Index Page Independent Auditors Report... 1-3 Management s Discussion And Analysis... 4-28 Financial Statements Statements Of Net Position... 29-30 Statements Of Financial
More informationWhat does it mean to be Financially Stable?
What does it mean to be Financially Stable? Lynn Tincher-Ladner Director of Institutional Research and Planning Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College A presentation to the members of SACCR, 2009 Pressures
More informationITEM FOR ACTION AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH INDENTURE FOR GENERAL REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE AND REFINANCE DEBT FOR UC PROJECTS
Office of the President July 3, 2003 504 TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: For Meeting of ITEM FOR ACTION AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH INDENTURE FOR GENERAL REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE AND REFINANCE DEBT
More informationARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FY 2006 FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS. Arizona State University Northern Arizona University The University of Arizona
ARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FY 2006 FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS Arizona State University Northern Arizona University The University of Arizona December 18, 2006 Arizona Board of Regents 2020 North Central Avenue,
More informationWashburn University of Topeka
Accountants Report and Financial Statements (Including Reports Required Under OMB-133) June 30, 2008 and 2007 June 30, 2008 and 2007 Contents Independent Accountants Report on Financial Statements and
More informationFinancial Review FISCAL YEAR 2015
Financial Review FISCAL YEAR 2015 AGENDA Overview Resource Sufficiency & Flexibility Operating Results Financial Asset Performance Debt Management Financial Outlook 2 Overview EWU is strong, vibrant, and
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING. Financial Statements. June 30, 2017 and (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon)
Financial Statements (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon) (THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY) Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 4
More informationOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY. June 30, 2011
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY June 30, 2011 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY June 30, 2011 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Independent Auditors Report... 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis... 3 Statements of Net
More informationSTATEMENTS FINANCIAL. Unaudited Fiscal Year 2016
STATEMENTS FINANCIAL Unaudited Fiscal Year 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Management s Discussion and Analysis 16 Financial Statements 16 Statements of Net Position The University of Mississippi 18 Statements
More informationCENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY Wilberforce, Ohio. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017 and 2016
Wilberforce, Ohio FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Wilberforce, Ohio FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT... 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)... 3 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STATEMENTS
More informationThe William Paterson University of New Jersey
The William Paterson University of New Jersey (A Component Unit of the State of New Jersey) Financial Statements and Management s Discussion and Analysis Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors Report
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING. Financial Statements. June 30, 2018
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING Financial Statements CLAconnect.com WEALTH ADVISORY OUTSOURCING AUDIT, TAX, AND CONSULTING Financial Statements (THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY)
More informationRe: Housing and Auxiliary Facilities System Revenue Bonds, Series 2017
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING AND AUXILIARY FACILITIES SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS BY THE SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS; PRESCRIBING ALL THE
More informationFiscal Analysis Including the Composite Financial Index: A Tale of Two Universities
Fiscal Analysis Including the Composite Financial Index: A Tale of Two Universities Presented By: Mary H. Loomis, CPA, MPA Vice President for Business & Finance Why use ratios? Ratios are important for
More informationBudgeting for Small Schools
Budgeting for Small Schools College Business Management Institute July 2017 Presented by Lisa Marie McCauley, Ed.D, CPA Senior Vice President for Finance Middle States Commission on Higher Education Chief
More informationUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington Debt Management Guidelines
University of North Carolina Wilmington Debt Management Guidelines 1. Introduction University of North Carolina Wilmington ( UNCW ) views its debt capacity as a resource that should be used, when appropriate,
More informationCase Western Reserve University Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
Contents Report of Independent Accountants 1 Part 1 Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheet 2 Consolidated Statement of Activities 3 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 4 Part 2 Summary
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY. FINANCIAL AUDIT (In Accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133)
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL AUDIT (In Accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133) For The Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 Performed as Special Assistant Auditors
More informationWORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY (AN AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS WITH
(AN AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS WITH SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION AND OTHER REPORTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016 AND INDEPENDENT
More informationFinancial Review. start something big
Financial Review Financial Outlook Achieving the Goals of the EWU Board of Trustees Academic Programs Strategic Plan Access Retention Degree completion Graduation rates High quality Program array Size
More information2018 Annual Financial Report
2018 Annual Financial Report 1 Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, Independent Auditors Report, and Management s Discussion and Analysis 3 Independent
More informationMORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Financial Statements Together with Report of Independent Public Accountants
Financial Statements Together with Report of Independent Public Accountants Years Ended JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015 CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 3
More informationUnderstanding College and University Financial Statements
Understanding College and University Financial Statements By Rudy Fichtenbaum Professor of Economics Department of Economics Wright State University Dayton, OH 45435 (937) 775-3085 rfichtenbaum@sbcglobal.net
More informationHOLYOKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FY 2016 FY 2020 DRAFT 11/12/14. Introduction
HOLYOKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FY 2016 FY 2020 DRAFT 11/12/14 Introduction Holyoke Community College s traditional mission to provide high quality, affordable educational opportunities to
More informationTHE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY (A Component Unit of the State of New Jersey)
THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY (A Component Unit of the State of New Jersey) Basic Financial Statements, Management s Discussion and Analysis and Required Supplementary Information June 30, 2017 and 2016 (With
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE. Financial Statements. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)
Financial Statements (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis 3 Basic Financial Statements: Statement of Net
More informationFISCAL YEARS 2012 & 2011 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEARS 2012 & 2011 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: The College of New Jersey Board of Trustees Dr. R. Barbara Gitenstein, President Lloyd Ricketts, Treasurer DATE: August 27, 2012
More informationThe University of Nebraska Facilities Corporation (A Component Unit of the University of Nebraska)
The University of Nebraska Facilities Corporation (A Component Unit of the University of Nebraska) Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 Independent Auditors Report TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationAIM HIGHER. FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended September 30, 2012
AIM HIGHER FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended September 30, 2012 Allan Gilmour President Ronald T. Brown Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs Louis Lessem Vice President and General Counsel
More informationDakota State University
Dakota State University Financial Report 2012 DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Management s Discussion and Analysis 1-6 Statement of Net Assets
More informationWashburn University of Topeka
Accountants Report and Financial Statements (Including Reports Required Under OMB-133) June 30, 2006 and 2005 June 30, 2006 and 2005 Contents Independent Accountants Report on Financial Statements and
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA (A Component Unit of the State of Alabama)
Basic Financial Statements and Supplementary Information on Federal Awards Programs September 30, 2009 Basic Financial Statements Table of Contents Management s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 1 Independent
More informationNORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY. Debt Management
Debt Management Policy Page 1 NEW POLICY: Sets out the general limitations under which A&T will issue debt. NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY I. INTRODUCTION Debt Management UNIVERSITY
More informationARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FY 2004 FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS
President Gary Stuart President Elect Chris Palacios Treasurer Robert Bulla Secretary Fred Boice ARIZONA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Board policy 3-410 requires each university to provide the Board with audited
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH DATE: March 14, 2008 TO: FROM: Vice Presidents Gould, Stephens, Robinson and Taylor, Director Cegles 2008-09 Resource Planning Process Task Force RPP SUBJECT: Campus
More informationUPDATE TO THE 7TH EDITION OF STRATEGIC FINANCIAL ANALYSIS IN HIGHER EDUCATION SUMMER 2016
UPDATE TO THE 7TH EDITION OF STRATEGIC FINANCIAL ANALYSIS IN HIGHER EDUCATION SUMMER 2016 1 UPDATE TO THE 7TH EDITION OF STRATEGIC FINANCIAL ANALYSIS IN HIGHER EDUCATION UPDATE TO THE 7TH EDITION OF STRATEGIC
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014 Dear Trustees, We are pleased to submit The College of New Jersey (the College) audited financial statements for the fiscal year ending June
More informationEAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2019 MEETING AGENDA
EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2019 MEETING 10:15-11:45am EST Friday February 22, 2019 The Millennium Center 2001 Millennium Pl Johnson
More informationWORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY (AN AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS WITH
(AN AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS WITH SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, STATISTICAL INFORMATION AND OTHER REPORTS YEARS ENDED JUNE
More information