The myth of China s overseas energy investment East Asia Forum

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "The myth of China s overseas energy investment East Asia Forum"

Johnathan Peters
5 years ago
Views:

1 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific Home Topics Countries Contributors Quarterly About The myth of China s overseas energy investment 4 March

Some analysts tend to believe that it represents a national energy procurement strategy driven by the central government.

1 1 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM Economics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific Home Topics Countries Contributors Quarterly About The myth of China s overseas energy investment 4 March 2015 Author: Zhao Hongtu, CICIR China s international energy investments and acquisitions have drawn much interest from foreign observers. Some analysts tend to believe that it represents a national energy procurement strategy driven by the central government. SUBSCRIBE Subscribe Weekly digest Each post More info and unsubscribe FOLLOW US Facebook Twitter RSS Google+ ARTICLE BROWSER These perceptions seem to derive from the phenomenon that China s overseas direct investment (ODI) is mostly focused on energy and conducted by state-owned enterprises (SOEs).There is a general lack of knowledge on how Chinese SOEs do business overseas and the nature of their relationship with the central government. The argument of some Chinese analysts that Chinese oil companies abroad can and should play an important role in securing China s energy security undoubtedly strengthens this popular impression in the West. FEATURES March 1: Xi s got the power to guide the CCP to 2049 In reality, however, the story is less sinister but more complicated. Overseas energy investment is not necessarily connected with a domestic energy shortage. China s ODI reflects and is an extension of China s domestic economic structure. These investment are mainly, but not exclusively, directed towards primary resources. But while the majority of Chinese energy and resource firms sectors are still SOEs, their share is decreasing with the rapid market transition and decentralisation occurring in February 22: Is PNG heading for a crisis?

2 2 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM China. In some respects, China s path in overseas investment is following a similar pattern to the US and Japan. As the domestic economic structure changes, the focus of overseas investment will shift from resource sectors to the manufacturing and service sectors. China s firms are mostly driven by profit motives and competitive pressure rather than energy security considerations or the need for resource acquisition. Although the government supports overseas investment, it is the enterprises, rather than the government, that generally initiates overseas investment decisions. China s economy has been in transition from a state-controlled economy to a more market-based economy for over thirty years. In this time, the government has worked hard to internationalise the economy by adopting the invite in and go out strategies. To invite in means opening the Chinese economy to foreign firms, while to go out means getting involved in the world market and investing overseas. February 15: The change in China s economy February 8: The costs of Australia s free trade agreement with America EDITORIALS ABOUT QUARTERLY LINKS In the resource sector, internationalisation means inviting foreign investment into China, investing in overseas exploration and production, as well as conducting overseas business in the technology and labour services. A key motivation for companies investing overseas, overlooked by the detractors who view Chinese SOEs as tools of the state, is economic self-development. International exploration and production are a means of improving the technological, technical and managerial capabilities of Chinese companies and facilitating the export of related facilities, technology and labour. The interests of China s resource companies and associations do not always accord with those of the government and are sometimes in direct conflict with them. Just as Eric Downs points out that, one of the primary complaints Chinese policymakers and pundits make about the overseas investment of Chinese SOEs is that each soldier is fighting his own war, with each company placing their corporate interests above national ones. For the enterprises, overseas commitment decisions are independently made based on their evaluation of the risks and returns. While they would like to secure whatever government support they can, they would continue their internationalisation and investment abroad even without any such support. This is especially so for non-state-owned enterprises and local SOEs, both of which enjoy little or no financial assistance. In most cases, it is the SOEs that recognise the opportunities first and initiate negotiations over the prospective investment. They then seek government approval of their investment plan and lobby for financial or diplomatic support if needed. As it strengthens international dialogue and cooperation both at the corporate and government levels, China also needs to be

3 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM more market oriented and transparent in domestic policymaking and promote steady economic, political and social transition.

It is essential for China s public to have a better understanding of the global resource situation and be more confident in the world energy market.

While developing an understanding of the challenges of ODI, companies need to cooperate more with their international counterparts and improve their transparency and public relations.

3 3 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM more market oriented and transparent in domestic policymaking and promote steady economic, political and social transition. The so-called non-market resource solutions and incomplete market-based methods in China arise from the unfinished nature of the transition from the planned economy to a market economy. It is essential for China s public to have a better understanding of the global resource situation and be more confident in the world energy market. Fortunately a growing number of Chinese analysts are realising that acquiring overseas equity has little impact on China s energy or resource security. While developing an understanding of the challenges of ODI, companies need to cooperate more with their international counterparts and improve their transparency and public relations. As the losses of SOEs in overseas investment receive more attention within China, further reform and liberalisation of SOEs as well as more overseas investment from non-soes can be expected in the future. Zhao Hongtu is Research Professor, Institute for World Economic Studies, China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR). SHARE: View more posts by Zhao Hongtu Download PDF Print RELATED POSTS How Chinese companies can do better overseas by Yuhan Zhang The rise of Chinese foreign investment by Peter Drysdale Chinese investment: a new form of colonialism? by Yang Yao Chinese state-owned

4 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM enterprise investment in

READING The Philippine economy is powering into 2015

Llanto Commission impossible for Abe s foreign

overseas energy investment by Zhao Hongtu NO

4 4 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM enterprise investment in Australia by Peter Drysdale WHAT OTHER PEOPLE ARE READING The Philippine economy is powering into 2015 by Gilberto M. Llanto Commission impossible for Abe s foreign policy by Michael Cucek How will Japan s new agriculture minister influence the TPP... by Aurelia George Mulgan The myth of China s overseas energy investment by Zhao Hongtu NO COMMENTS Post a comment Your address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * * Website Comment Post Comment

5 5 of 5 3/4/2015 6:11 PM

Overseas Impacts of China s Outward Direct Investment

1 Overseas Impacts of China s Outward Direct Investment Bijun Wang 1, Rui Mao 2 and Qin Gou 3 1 Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 2 Zhejiang University 3 Peking University Prepared for 10 th Trilateral