FUNDAMENTAL VALUE EQUITIES 02 THE BIG PICTURE 04 FINDING VALUE 06 RESEARCH BRIEFING. Taking Stock Q Concentrating on long-term value

Transcription

1 Taking Stock Q THE BIG PICTURE Volatility re-emerged in Q1 after a lengthy absence. But does that change how one should value stocks? FUNDAMENTAL VALUE EQUITIES Concentrating on long-term value 4 FINDING VALUE Stock Highlight: Goldcorp Valuation and quality metrics rather than fluctuating gold prices are key in analysing miners. 6 RESEARCH BRIEFING Value and Share Buybacks We look at whether share buybacks are the best option for shareholders.

2 Fundamental Value Equities Q1 218 THE BIG PICTURE Barry Glavin, Chief Investment Officer Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, fell 2.2% in the first quarter of 218, and along the way triggered a cascade of headlines proclaiming the resurgence of volatility and risk. As long-term value investors, we are familiar with sudden market shifts while recognising that these moves are for the most part a reaction to noise. But such moves also serve as a reminder about the importance of fundamentals in determining value. Pausing to take stock of the landscape is usually a worthwhile endeavour. The index ended the quarter at a level of 25, some 9% below its January peak. This move is actually quite modest in the context of where the market has come from the index low in March 29 was 649. Nevertheless, it s not an insignificant drop and anxiety levels are elevated; and if we just look at price, the current set-up is less than encouraging. If the goal is to buy low and sell high, uncharted territory is required we need new highs. Figure 1a: Corporate Earnings (April 28 April 218) High Market Valuations As we ve pointed out before, for the index to rise, either earnings must grow or the multiple the market is willing to ascribe to those earnings must expand. Earnings growth has been improving and now exceeds the peaks recorded prior to the onset of the global financial crisis in 27. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiple of 15.6x sits two percentage points above the 1-year average (Figure 1a). A high P/E can indicate investor optimism for future earnings growth. The Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio produces similar observations. At 2.3x, the market P/B compares to a ten-year average level of 1.8x (Figure 1b). Unlike earnings, the market s Return on Equity (ROE) has not recovered to pre-crisis levels and we do not expect it to. Leverage in the financial sector flattered the market s ROE pre-crisis and, for now at least, that lesson seems to have been learned. Historic data offers guidance. Having plotted the P/B ratio of the index for each month and the subsequent return over five years, Figure 2 illustrates a clear relationship between valuation and investment outcome the lower the valuation (P/B), the better the return. We can see that P/B multiples have been well above today s levels but once above current multiples, the prospect of negative returns becomes more prevalent. For an investment in the index at this level to be profitable, either earnings growth must accelerate, or multiples must expand from already elevated levels. This is possible, but requires unadulterated good news to overcome the odds. Anything less and the high multiples of record profitability leave the market illplaced to withstand disappointments or adverse events. In other words, we don t believe there is a margin of safety in the global index at this point. Figure 1b: Market Price-to-Book (April 28 April 218) EPS (Rebased to 1) Price to Earnings (Multiple) Return on Equity (%) Price to Book (Multiple) MSCI World P/E Average MSCI World P/E MSCI World Earnings per Share (Local Currency) LHS MSCI World P/B Average P/B MSCI World ROE LHS Source: FactSet, MSCI, SSGA as at 31/3/218. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. 2

3 Figure 2: MSCI World 5-Year Returns Versus Trailing P/B: year Return (%) 1 8 Current Trailing P/B: 2.3x Starting P/B (Trailing) Source: Factset, MSCI, SSGA as at 31/3/218. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Value in Stocks However, we don t invest in the index, we pick stocks. We look for companies where earnings or returns are below what we believe to be normal, and we seek to acquire stakes at depressed multiples of those throughcycle earnings. Identifying such opportunities requires effort, discipline, patience etc., but also a co-operative opportunity set. Despite overall market valuations, we believe that significant pockets of value remain in the market. Today the US accounts for almost 7% of the MSCI World Index. The US portion of the index trades at three times book value a significant premium to both history and other markets. Elsewhere, headline valuations look reasonable and, as one would expect, it is towards these regions that our capital is presently weighted. This means our Global Value Spotlight Strategy has about 3% of its assets in US stocks. Does this significant underweight relative to the index represent a risk? To some it might, but to us it does not. Our mandate is to go where the value is, not to reason in terms of benchmark weights. Figure 3: Many Regions Expensive at Market Level Price to Book (Multiple) 4 Risk Approach Our approach to risk is to conduct detailed due diligence on each investment to ensure that a) our assumptions around earnings power are robust, b) that the company has sufficient capital to support that earnings stream, and c) that it has the resources to cope with adversity. We then seek to establish that the price we pay is sufficiently attractive to provide a margin of safety. Despite our extensive analysis, we accept that we can be wrong. The future is uncertain, and we demand a price for each investment that compensates us to assume that uncertainty. Rising geopolitical and trade tensions, higher inflation, and the ongoing withdrawal of monetary stimulus have re-introduced near-forgotten levels of market volatility. Longer term data suggests that volatility levels are now simply closer to historic averages and, as such, investors may have to get used to equity markets behaving like equity markets again Developed Emerging North America Europe Eurozone Asia Pacific ex Japan Japan 1 YR Range Current Price to Book Source: Fact, SSGA as at 31/3/218. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. State Street Global Advisors 3

4 Fundamental Value Equities Q1 218 FINDING VALUE Owen Dwyer, Research Analyst Goldcorp At a time when most asset markets are close to all-time highs, gold mining stocks are trading at 15-year lows and look intriguing to value investors. Within this sub-sector, Goldcorp stands out, trading at a low valuation, with a high-quality asset base, a strong balance sheet and a relatively new operationallyfocused management team. The company trades at a substantial discount to our assessment of its intrinsic value. The Company Goldcorp is the world s third largest gold miner by market cap, producing 2.5 million ounces of gold from eight assets in the Americas (Canada, Mexico, Argentina and Dominican Republic). For most of the 2s, the company attracted investor interest as it invested heavily in growth as the gold price rose. At the share price peak in 211, Goldcorp had an Invested Capital base of c. $24bn with plans to increase gold production from 2.5m to 4m ounces by 215. It wasn t alone in pursuing a hefty capital expenditure strategy (Figure 4a) but success needed a rising gold price. Instead, gold dropped from $1,9 in mid-211 to about $1,2 in 215. Goldcorp s Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of c.7% in 211 collapsed to zero in 215, and the company wrote down assets of $1.5bn. By 216, the shares had dropped 7% and went from trading at over two times Enterprise Value to Invested Capital (EV/IC)* to today s level of.6x, with all of the invested capital in tangible assets and the majority of which is tier 1 gold mines (large, low cost, long life and relatively new). Organization change followed with an external CEO appointed alongside a more value and operationally focused management team. Goldcorp is now on track to increase production by 2% where the vast majority of the capex has been spent and should lead to a 2% reduction in costs at a time when industry investment has collapsed and grades (i.e. % gold per tonne of ore) have significantly deteriorated (Figure 4b). It s EV/IC of.6x compares favorably to 1.2x 1.8x EV/ IC range of its gold and industrial mining peers. Figure 4a: Gold Industry Capex USD (mn) Long-term trend: 25% CAGR -78% Figure 4b: Industry Head Grade (Gold per Tonne of Ore) (% gold per tonne of ore) Long-term trend: -5% CAGR Defying the trend to make ends meet FY Source: Citi Research as at October FY

5 Our approach to evaluating companies in the gold industry is to focus on what we can measure without getting overly involved in an emotive philosophical discussion around gold s status as 1) a currency, 2) an insurance policy against turbulence, or 3) a lump of useless shiny metal. In the context of the broader mining/ commodities sector, history tells us that over time, industry returns revert to cost of capital. If the outcome is cost of capital type returns, then the objective is to find a potential investment which has at least industry average quality assets, trading at a substantial discount with a decent margin of safety. In Goldcorp, we believe this company has well above average asset quality, a decent balance sheet, shareholder-aligned management and a valuation which assumes that company returns remain below the cost of capital into perpetuity. Revenue, Operating Profit and Cashflow Outlook Goldcorp revenue is largely a function of production volume by the gold price. Unlike most commodities, where prices are typically well above industry cost, gold is currently trading broadly in line with industry cost and well below the price that would be required to incentivize producers to develop new mines. Goldcorp volumes are likely to increase from 2.5m ounces to 3m ounces by 22 as its recent investments start to deliver, with three key mines driving performance Penasquito in Mexico, Cerro Negro in Argentina and Eleonore in Canada. We believe all three mines have been largely operationally de-risked. Penasquito: Productivity gains and operational improvements should see production double at low cost we assume a mid-term cost of $35/oz. Cerro Negro: Helped by an improving political backdrop and company efforts to address labour unrest, production is on track to increase by 33% while costs should decline by close to $1/oz as productivity improves. Eleonore: Production here is expected to increase by 5% while costs are expected to decline from $1,1/oz to $75/oz. Elsewhere, the firm s portfolio has been streamlined, costs have been taken out and operational delivery significantly tightened up. A focus on productivity appears on track to deliver $25m in sustainable efficiencies to help the company reduce its all-in cost to $7/oz versus $85/oz today. This should move Goldcorp costs firmly into the first quartile of gold miners globally and at the current gold price generate about $1bn of free cashflow. Invested Capital The commodity super-cycle led to capital destruction on an epic scale across the mining industry. Goldcorp was among the largest culprits with a write-down of asset values amounting to $1.5bn and capital expenidture of $12.7bn since 21; in the context of today s market cap of $13bn that is a significant outlay. Goldcorp has spent most of the money to ramp up its newest mines while sub-scale and high-cost operations have been sold and long-life but older assets have been restructured. In addition, with 53m ounces of reserves, we believe Goldcorp can sustain production above 3m ounces in the medium term. Summary Trading at.6x EV/IC, where all the Invested Capital is tangible assets, and a clear operating plan which can be tracked and monitored, Goldcorp looks to tick a lot of the boxes that are attractive to value managers such as ourselves. * In our investment framework, the market rating of capital is measured as Enterprise Value divided by Invested Capital, or EV/IC. Enterprise Value is the market valuation of the firm s capital, and includes the market value of equity, debt, pension liabilities, associate investments and minorities. Invested Capital is the measure of capital intensity of the firm, and represents the replacement value of all assets on the firm s balance sheet, adjusted for working capital. State Street Global Advisors 5

6 Fundamental Value Equities Q1 218 RESEARCH BRIEFING Jeremy James, Head of Investment Research As a rule of thumb, our hierarchy of priorities around capital deployment are as follows: 1. Organic investment 2. Value creative merger and acquisition (M&A) 3. Dividends 4. Buybacks Can Share Buybacks Create Value? Ascertaining a company s value is at the heart of what we do. We analyse the sustainable earnings power or returns of the company and the capital required to generate those returns. We prefer companies with the potential to generate good returns, and have opportunities to grow their invested capital base by reinvesting in areas with returns above a required hurdle rate. We are interested when the market undervalues these returns. We are surprised by the number of analysts and managements who concentrate instead on earnings per share (EPS) and earnings growth without thinking about the link between returns on invested capital (ROIC) and price earnings. Share buybacks might boost EPS, but is that best for shareholders? Capital Deployment We look at capital deployment in terms of whether it adds value by earning a return above our required hurdle rate of return (the opportunity cost of capital). We calculate the net present value of the excess returns and add them to the opening invested capital to arrive at an intrinsic value. 1. Organic investment, whether classified as capital expenditure or operating expenditure, is the charge required to deliver our assumptions about growth and profitability. As long as the investment generates a ROIC in present value terms above the hurdle rate, it is truly accretive to shareholders. 2. Most M&A fails to create value for the acquirer. In addition, many deals take place at the peak of the economic cycle when valuations are high. While the ROIC and growth of the target is often attractive, the price paid determines its real value. 3. Dividends allow shareholders to choose how to reinvest the cash (accepting some tax differentials between income and capital gains). If a company is overcapitalised, has little opportunity to invest to create value, and has a stock value which management believes is overvalued, then shareholders should prefer a special dividend. 4. We believe management should objectively value their companies, and only buy shares when it is trading below its intrinsic value and no better investment opportunities are available. In his 2 shareholder letter, Warren Buffet criticised those prioritising buybacks I can t help but feel that too often, today s repurchases are dictated by management s desire to show confidence or be in fashion rather than by a desire to enhance per-share value. Berkshire Hathaway (Buffet s investment vehicle) recently set an intrinsic value below which they would be prepared to buy back their shares. We are skeptical that most management teams only consider buybacks when intrinsic value far exceeds book value. Management are often incentivised to do share buybacks because they have EPS targets rather than using returns based metrics. According to a Goldman Sachs study, some 3 35% of S&P 5 companies (ex financials) use EPS as a measurement of management performance in Long and Short-Term Incentive Plans. 6

7 Share Buybacks Share buybacks do not increase the value of a company, because they do not increase the total cash flow of the business. While share repurchases can increase EPS (when the earnings yield of the company is above the after-tax interest rate), they tend to reduce the P/E multiple as investors adjust their valuations to reflect the reduction in both cash and shares, as well as for the higher leverage of the business. Low returns from excess cash should not be used as a benchmark for new investments and neither should the low cost of borrowing. Returns on investment should be benchmarked against the risk associated with that investment. Even repurchasing shares when undervalued simply shifts value from shareholders who sell to those that do not. However, assuming that management have conducted objective work that tells them that their stock is undervalued, then share buybacks can create value for continuing shareholders. Historically, the timing of share buybacks has been value destructive. Figure 5 shows buybacks in the S&P 5 since 1999; buybacks were highest near the peak of the market and lowest at the bottom. And it was at the lows of the market that gross issuance of equity exceeded buybacks. Buybacks vs Investment How management measures returns on organic investment versus other forms of capital allocation such as share buybacks is important. In particular, where investment hits the P&L rather than being capitalised, a timing mismatch between investment and payback is created. To increase short-term returns at the expense of sustaining long-term returns, there is a temptation to underinvest or increase leverage through buybacks. We look at the historic long-term returns of the firm s industry, and any competitive dynamics that may fundamentally affect those. We compare them with company returns and the required rate of return. If materially different, we analyse why this might be (point in the cycle, competitive advantages/disadvantages etc.) and whether the differences are sustainable. When we talk to management teams we discuss capital allocation and sustainability of returns at length. Capital allocation decisions are powerful drivers of value creation. We would expect companies to have management accounting systems which allow them to measure returns by division or returns on major investment projects. Similarly, management should be able to justify the value created by share buybacks. Figure 5: Buybacks and Issuance Follow Market Cycles March 2 to December 217 S&P 5 Index Level USD (bn) 3, 2,3 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 1,8 1, Mar May Aug Nov Feb Apr Jul Oct Dec -1, Buybacks Issuance S&P 5 (lhs) Net Buybacks Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. State Street Global Advisors 7

8 ssga.com Marketing communication. State Street Global Advisors Worldwide Entities Australia: State Street Global Advisors, Australia, Limited (ABN ) is the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL Number ). Registered office: Level 17, 42 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2, Australia. T: F: Belgium: State Street Global Advisors Belgium, Chaussée de La Hulpe 12, 1 Brussels, Belgium. T: F: SSGA Belgium is a branch office of State Street Global Advisors Limited. State Street Global Advisors Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom. Canada: State Street Global Advisors, Ltd., 77 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 12 Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, T: and 3 Adelaide Street East Suite 5, Toronto, Ontario M5C 3G6. T: Dubai: State Street Bank and Trust Company (Representative Office), Boulevard Plaza 1, 17th Floor, Office 173 Near Dubai Mall & Burj Khalifa, P.O Box 26838, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. T: +971 () F: +971 () France: State Street Global Advisors Ireland Limited, Paris branch is a branch of State Street Global Advisors Ireland Limited, registered in Ireland with company number , authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland, and whose registered office is at 78 Sir John Rogerson s Quay, Dublin 2. State Street Global Advisors Ireland Limited, Paris Branch, is registered in France with company number RCS Nanterre and whose office is at Immeuble Défense Plaza, rue Delarivière-Lefoullon, 9264 Paris La Défense Cedex, France. T: (+33) F: (+33) Germany: State Street Global Advisors GmbH, Brienner Strasse 59, D-8333 Munich. Authorised and regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ( BaFin ). Registered with the Register of Commerce Munich HRB T: +49 () F: +49 () Hong Kong: State Street Global Advisors Asia Limited, 68/F, Two International Finance Centre, 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong. T: F: Ireland: State Street Global Advisors Ireland Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Registered office address 78 Sir John Rogerson s Quay, Dublin 2. Registered number T: +353 () F: +353 () Italy: State Street Global Advisors Limited, Milan Branch (Sede Secondaria di Milano) is a branch of State Street Global Advisors Limited, a company registered in the UK, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA ), with a capital of GBP 62,35,, and whose registered office is at 2 Churchill Place, London E14 5HJ. State Street Global Advisors Limited, Milan Branch (Sede Secondaria di Milano), is registered in Italy with company number R.E.A and VAT number and whose office is at Via dei Bossi, Milano, Italy. T: F: Japan: State Street Global Advisors (Japan) Co., Ltd., Toranomon Hills Mori Tower 25F Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo Japan, T: Financial Instruments Business Operator, Kanto Local Financial Bureau (Kinsho #345), Membership: Japan Investment Advisers Association, The Investment Trust Association, Japan, Japan Securities Dealers Association. Netherlands: State Street Global Advisors Netherlands, Apollo Building, 7th floor Herikerbergweg CN Amsterdam, Netherlands. T: SSGA Netherlands is a branch office of State Street Global Advisors Limited. State Street Global Advisors Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom. Singapore: State Street Global Advisors Singapore Limited, 168, Robinson Road, #33-1 Capital Tower, Singapore (Company Reg. No: 22719D, regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore). T: F: Switzerland: State Street Global Advisors AG, Beethovenstr. 19, CH-827 Zurich. Authorised and regulated by the Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht ( FINMA ). Registered with the Register of Commerce Zurich CHE T: +41 () F: +41 () United Kingdom: State Street Global Advisors Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England. Registered No VAT No Registered office: 2 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HJ. T: F: United States: State Street Global Advisors, One Iron Street, Boston MA 221. T: The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forward-looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. The trademarks and service marks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners. Third party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and have no liability for damages of any kind relating to the use of such data. State Street Global Advisors 218 State Street Corporation. All Rights Reserved. ID GBL.RTL