Arctic Oil and Gas Development: Key Legal Issues. Timothy J. Tyler Counsel, Vinson & Elkins

Transcription

1 Arctic Oil and Gas Development: Key Legal Issues Timothy J. Tyler Counsel, Vinson & Elkins June 22, 2012

2 The most extensive oil resource can be found comfortably within the United States and the vast majority of hydrocarbon resources are currently found within the territory of each of the states. Nonetheless, the framework must be developed for some resources provinces. -Gaps in the Ice: Maritime Boundaries and Hydrocarbon Field Development in the Arctic by Timothy J. Tyler, James L Loftis, and Emilie Hawker 2

3 Arctic Knowledge: Tip of the Iceberg [T]he challenge of working in the Arctic, unlike virtually any other part of the globe, is that so little information is available that almost any new bit of data can change perspectives regarding oil and gas resources. -Scientist, U.S. Geological Survey 3

4 Two Main Issues Technical unknowns concerning the location of oil fields that underlie the Arctic Expansion of continental shelf claims yet to be submitted to and resolved by the CLCS 4

5 Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA): USGS Probability Map of Arctic Oil or Gas 5

6 CARA: Gas Provinces 6

7 Exploration Intensity 7

8 IBRU Map of Maritime Jurisdiction and Boundaries in the Arctic Region 8

9 Expansion of the Arctic Continental Shelves 2 hypothetical approaches to partitioning the combined continental shelf. 1-Canada 2-Denmark 3-Norway 4-Russia 5-United States 9

10 Denmark s Fieldwork Focusing on Acquisition of Bathymetric and Seismic Data 10

11 Ultimate Recoverable Oil and Gas Beaufort-Mackenzie 8.2 billion barrels of oil 60.5 trillion cubic feet of gas Arctic Islands 3.9 billion barrels of oil 58.3 trillion cubic feet of gas Mackenzie Valley 0.6 billion barrels of oil 12.6 trillion cubic feet of gas Eastern Arctic Offshore 1.5 billion barrels of oil 16.7 trillion cubic feet of gas Drummond compilation March 2009: numbers represent means of probability distributions and are presented to illustrate the relative magnitude of the resource. Estimate of ultimate potential are based on inference and subject to many uncertainties

12 Arctic Hydrocarbon Resources 12

13 Existing Delimitation Treaties Russia Norway Canada Denmark USA Russia *** 2010 (EBB, EB) No treaty (LM) No treaty (LM) 1990 (NCWF, HB) Norway *** *** No border 1965, 1979 No border Canada *** *** *** 1973 (WGEC) No agreement (AM) Denmark *** *** *** *** No border USA *** *** *** *** *** 13

14 Precedents for a Unitization Framework 2010 Barents Sea Agreement (Nor.-Rus.) Annex II Transboundary Hydrocarbon Deposits North Sea Agreements (Nor.-UK) Frigg and Statfjord Agreements Other bilateral international agreements 2012 US-Mexico Agreement Australia/Timor L Este; Trinidad and Tobago-Venezuela Examples of commercial parties providing solutions Brunei/Malaysia 14

15 Speaker Biography Timothy Tyler Tim s 15-year litigation practice emphasizes both international commercial and investor-state arbitration and U.S. litigation with a non-u.s. element. His work involving contracts with state parties has a strong focus on the oil and gas industry. In practice, he regularly advises on and drafts international arbitration clauses in contracts as well as structuring transactions to gain investment treaty protection. Counsel First City Tower 1001 Fannin Street Suite 2500 Houston, TX Tel Fax ttyler@velaw.com He has been involved in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules, as well as institutional arbitrations under the rules of ICC, ICDR, ICSID, AAA, Singapore International Arbitration Centre, and Cairo Regional International Arbitration Centre. In these and other proceedings, his international work encompasses particular experience with clients in Canada, Mexico, the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Middle East, and Europe. Tim has taught international commercial and investor-state arbitration at The University of Texas School of Law, where he has served as an Adjunct Professor. Since Fall 2009, he has been the director of the international arbitration section of The University of Texas School of Law Center on Global Energy, International Arbitration, and the Environment. 15

16 Disclaimer This content is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or services. 16