DST Systems, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Transcription

1 Section 1: SD (DST SYSTEMS, INC. SD ) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM SD SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORT DST Systems, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 333 West 11 th Street Kansas City, Missouri (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Randall D. Young Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 333 West 11 th Street Kanas City, MO Tel: (516) (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2014.

2 Section 1 Conflict Minerals Disclosure Item 1.01 CONFLICT MINERALS DISCLOSURE AND REPORT DST Systems, Inc. ("DST") may be considered to have manufactured products to which certain Designated Minerals (as defined below) are necessary to the functionality or production of such products. After exercising reasonable due diligence as required by Rule 13p-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, DST determined that tungsten was used in one or more of its products, and that tungsten is necessary to such product(s) functionality or production, but was unable to determine whether the tungsten used originated from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country that shares an internationally recognized border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A copy of this Form SD and the accompanying Conflict Minerals Report may be found publicly on DST's internet website at: The content of any website referred to in this Form SD is included for general information only and is not incorporated by reference into this Form SD. Forward-Looking Statements This Form SD and the Conflict Minerals Report filed as an exhibit hereto contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Any statements that do not relate to historical or current or matters are forward-looking statements. You can identify some of the forward-looking statements by use of forward-looking words, such as intend and the like, or the use of future tense. Statements concerning current conditions may also be forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current conditions. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual actions or performance to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties may include, but are not limited to, the implementation of satisfactory traceability and other compliance measures by our direct and indirect suppliers, on a timely basis or at all, whether smelters and refiners and other market participants responsibly source Conflict Minerals and political and regulatory developments, whether in the Democratic Republic of the Congo region, the United States, or elsewhere. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of filing of this document. We undertake no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of filing of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Item 1.02 EXHIBIT. The Conflict Minerals Report required by Item 1.01 of Form SD is filed as an exhibit to this Form SD. Section 2 EXHIBITS Item 2.01 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.01 Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of Form SD.

3 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned. DST Systems, Inc. (Registrant) By: /s/ Randall D. Young Randall D. Young Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Dated: May 29, 2015 (Back To Top) Section 2: EX-1.01 (EXHIBIT 1.01) Exhibit 1.01 DST Systems, Inc. Conflict Minerals Report For The Year Ended December 31, 2014 Introduction DST Systems, Inc. is a global provider of technology-based information processing and servicing solutions. References below to DST, the Company, we, us and our may refer to DST Systems, Inc. exclusively or to one or more of our subsidiaries. We provide business solutions through a unique blend of industry knowledge and experience, technological expertise and service excellence to clients in the asset management, brokerage, retirement, healthcare and other markets. This Conflict Minerals Report for the year ended December 31, 2014 is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Rule ). The Rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of Pursuant to the Rule, if an SEC registrant manufactures or contracts to manufacture products containing cassiterite (tin), columbite-tantalite (tantalum), gold, and wolframite (tungsten) (collectively, Conflict Minerals ), and the Conflict Minerals are necessary to such product s functionality or production, the Rule requires that the registrant undertake a reasonable country of origin inquiry. If, as a result of the reasonable country of origin inquiry, the registrant knows or has reason to believe that any Conflict Minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country as defined in the Conflict Minerals Rule (the Covered Countries ), and are not from recycled or scrap sources, the registrant must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of such minerals. The Company s due diligence process, described below, is based on methodology and policies in accordance with Annex 1 Five Step Framework for Risk-Based Due Diligence in the Mineral Supply Chain from the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development ( OECD ) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (the OECD Framework ). The list of products covered by this Conflict Minerals Report is included in Attachment A hereto, which is an integral part of this Conflicts Minerals Report. 1. Establish strong company management systems. DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURES We have adopted and included within our Supplier Guidelines a policy governing the supply chain of minerals originating from conflict-affected or high-risk areas, which provides that we encourage our suppliers of components that we use in products which we may be considered to manufacture or contract to manufacture to come from sources that are deemed to be considered DRC conflict free. DST has in place, and continues to develop, due diligence measures so that we may disclose use of conflict minerals, as required by law, in our products that may be considered that we manufacture or contract to manufacture. These requirements and obligations are carried out by DST s Procurement Team and included in the team s procedures.

4 2. Steps taken to identify risks in the supply chain. For calendar year 2014, DST followed an approach for risk-based due diligence consistent with the OECD Framework. Specifically, DST followed the process set forth below to determine the use, source and origin of conflict minerals, if any, in its product portfolio across our businesses: We evaluated all our businesses and determined that products may be deemed to be manufactured within our Customer Communications segment. In cases where we identified that a Conflict Mineral may have been included in the product, we evaluated whether that mineral is necessary for the functionality or production of the product. 3. Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks. In situations where it was determined that a Conflict Mineral is necessary for the functionality or production of one of our products, we carried out a reasonable country of origin inquiry, including a documented due diligence process, as suggested by the OECD guidelines. This due diligence process includes: Utilizing the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) published by the Conflict Free Smelter Initiative (CFSI) survey for identified vendors to our Customer Communications segment, as necessary. Additionally, DST is implementing, as an addition to our existing Supplier Guidelines, a conflict minerals policy which encourages our suppliers to provide us with products that do not contain minerals that are sourced from mines that support militia activity, to notify us promptly if their products do contain such minerals, and to respond to our inquiries regarding conflict minerals and to make necessary inquiries of their own suppliers. Conducting, as necessary, site visits and in-person interviews with select key vendors within our supply chain as part of our ongoing due diligence protocol. When determined to be necessary, confirmation that the vendor utilizes a smelter in the Conflict Free Smelter ( CFS ) program, if known, or that such minerals were derived from recycling or scrap sources. Our continuous application of systems, procedures and strong governance processes is designed to ensure proper implementation of our Supplier Guidelines, which includes Conflict Minerals. These systems, procedures and processes may change from time to time as we strive to improve them. 4. Carry out independent third-party audits. We use resources from the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative ( CFSI ) and OECD to understand if and when an independent third party audit of a supplier may be necessary. By ensuring that a supplier is utilizing a CFS in its supply chain we may rely on the supplier s audit. In addition, we will also utilize tools available through the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition ( EICC ) and the Global e-sustainability Initiative ( GeSI ) which are sponsors of the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative ( CFSI ) supporting the sourcing of conflict-free minerals. The CFSI is a global leader for the responsible sourcing of minerals and provides information on conflict-free smelters and refiners, common tools to gather sourcing information, and forums for exchanging best practices on addressing Conflicts Minerals. 5. Supply chain due diligence reporting. A reporting system is being developed to identify risks and issues regarding our Supplier Guidelines policy, including conflict mineral-related risks or issues. Our Conflict Minerals Statement is within our Supplier Guidelines, which can be found at: 6. Results for the 2014 calendar year. As of December 31, 2014, we have applied our due diligence process to a significant portion of our supply chain and our processes which may be considered to be the manufacture of products. For calendar year 2014, we identified DST products that contained, or may contain, Conflict Minerals and the vendors supplying such Conflict Minerals to our supply chain. Currently, we have not been alerted to the use of Conflict Minerals originating from the DRC region that would necessitate a determination of whether they were sourced from a legitimate, conflict-free mine. 7. Steps we have taken or will take subsequent to December 31, We will continue with our due diligence process as described above and continue to monitor and update our risk-based approach in future periods. This Conflict Minerals Report was not subjected to an independent private sector audit as such an audit was not required by paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of the instructions to Item 1.01 of Form SD. 8. Covered Products. On the basis of the due diligence measures described above, DST has concluded in good faith that during this reporting period, the necessary Conflict Minerals contained in our products that originated or may have originated from the Covered Countries are DRC conflict undeterminable. These products include finished printed statements from our Customer Communications segment.

5 Below is a summary of the countries where the Conflict Minerals may have originated. Conflict Mineral Countries of origin and other sources may include the following Australia, Austria, Bolivia, Brazil, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, China, Colombia, Germany, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, Portugal, Russian Federation, Rwanda, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, United States, Vietnam and recycled or scrap sources

6 Inherent Limitations on Due Diligence Procedures Our due diligence procedures can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the source and chain of custody of Conflict Minerals. Our due diligence processes are based on the necessity of seeking data from our direct suppliers and those suppliers seeking similar information within their supply chains to identify the original sources of Conflict Minerals. We also rely, to a large extent, on information collected and provided by third parties. Such sources of information may yield inaccurate or incomplete information.

7 Attachment A List of Identified Smelters The following smelters have been identified during the procedures performed above. Metal Smelter Name Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd. Xiamen Co., Ltd. Chongyi Zhangyuan Co., Ltd. Ganzhou Non-ferrous Metals Smelting Co., Ltd. Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Group Co Ltd (Back To Top)